Lessons from antiamyloid-β immunotherapies in Alzheimer's disease

Uncertainties in anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy for Alzheimer's disease: the challenges ahead

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, poses a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. After two decades of extensive efforts, we are still without significantly effective disease-modifying drugs for AD. Although brain amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation may predict cognitive decline, several drug candidates, including anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, have been developed and tested to reduce Aβ plaque burden effective, but without significant clinical success.

AREAS COVERED

The following review presents and discusses anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapeutics used to treat AD. The article considers both current approaches and alternatives. This article is multiple database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid and Google Scholar) on all the available literature up to 1 February 2025.

EXPERT OPINION

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anti-Aβ drugs in AD have not fully validated the Aβ cascade hypothesis. Nevertheless, eight anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies have, thus far, made it to Phase III RCTs. Moving forward, the use of the Apolipoprotein E genotype and tau protein as alternative biomarkers can assist clinicians in providing patients with even more individualized and efficacious anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies dosing regimens and reduce the risk of serious amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.

Successes and failures: the latest advances in the clinical development of amyloid-β-targeting monoclonal antibodies for treating Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

The amyloid cascade hypothesis postulated that the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) was the first step of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathological process. Effective reduction of Aβ plaque load by numerous drug candidates, among which anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies, has produced discussible clinical successes and several failures. It was questioned whether Aβ may be the principal AD pathogenic factor and a valid therapeutic target and if targeting Aβ different species could make the difference.

AREAS COVERED

This review article summarized successes and failures of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody therapy for AD, delineating the latest advances for their clinical development also according to their target engagement and downstream biomarkers.

EXPERT OPINION

The preliminary success of the recent Phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of lecanemab, donanemab, and remternetug, and lessons learned from the failure of previous anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies RCTs, provided critical evidence to support the role of Aβ in AD pathogenesis. The loss of free Aβ instead of an Aβ toxicity may promote AD neuropathology. Cerebrospinal fluid analyses (i.e. increases in Aβ1-42) may indicate a potential benefit of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies in AD and downstream biomarkers should be considered for providing comprehension in cognitive and clinical efficacy of future AD RCTs.

Passive Anti-amyloid Beta Monoclonal Antibodies: Lessons Learned over Past 20 Years

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impairs cognitive and functional abilities, placing a substantial burden on both patients and caregivers. Current symptomatic treatments fail to halt the progression of AD, highlighting the urgent need for more effective disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). DMTs under development are classified as either passive or active on the basis of their mechanisms of eliciting an immune response. While this review will touch on active immunotherapies, we primarily focus on anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a form of passive immunotherapy, discussing their multifaceted role in AD treatment and the critical factors influencing their therapeutic efficacy. With two mAbs now approved and prescribed in the clinical setting, it is crucial to reflect on the lessons learned from trials of earlier mAbs that have shaped their development and contributed to their current success. These insights can then guide the creation of even more effective mAbs, ultimately enhancing therapeutic outcomes for patients with AD while minimizing adverse events.

Dysregulated mTOR networks in experimental sporadic Alzheimer's disease

Background

Beyond the signature amyloid-beta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been shown to exhibit dysregulated metabolic signaling through insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) networks that crosstalk with the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Its broad impact on brain structure and function suggests that mTOR is likely an important therapeutic target for AD.

Objective

This study characterizes temporal lobe (TL) mTOR signaling abnormalities in a rat model of sporadic AD neurodegeneration.

Methods

Long Evans rats were given intracerebroventricular injections of streptozotocin (ic-STZ) or saline (control), and 4 weeks later, they were administered neurobehavioral tests followed by terminal harvesting of the TLs for histopathological study and measurement of AD biomarkers, neuroinflammatory/oxidative stress markers, and total and phosphorylated insulin/IGF-1-Akt-mTOR pathway signaling molecules.

Results

Rats treated with ic-STZ exhibited significantly impaired performance on Rotarod (RR) and Morris Water Maze (MWM) tests, brain atrophy, TL and hippocampal neuronal and white matter degeneration, and elevated TL pTau, AβPP, Aβ, AChE, 4-HNE, and GAPDH and reduced ubiquitin, IL-2, IL-6, and IFN-γ immunoreactivities. In addition, ic-STZ reduced TL pY1135/1136-IGF-1R, Akt, PTEN, pS380-PTEN, pS2448-mTOR, p70S6K, pT412-p70S6K, p/T-pT412-p70S6K, p/T-Rictor, and p/T-Raptor.

Conclusion

Experimental ic-STZ-induced sporadic AD-type neurodegeneration with neurobehavioral dysfunctions associated with inhibition of mTOR signaling networks linked to energy metabolism, plasticity, and white matter integrity.

Treatment of Acute and Long-COVID, Diabetes, Myocardial Infarction, and Alzheimer's Disease: The Potential Role of a Novel Nano-Compound-The Transdermal Glutathione-Cyclodextrin Complex

Oxidative stress (OS) occurs from excessive reactive oxygen species or a deficiency of antioxidants-primarily endogenous glutathione (GSH). There are many illnesses, from acute and post-COVID-19, diabetes, myocardial infarction to Alzheimer's disease, that are associated with OS. These dissimilar illnesses are, in order, viral infections, metabolic disorders, ischemic events, and neurodegenerative disorders. Evidence is presented that in many illnesses, (1) OS is an early initiator and significant promotor of their progressive pathophysiologic processes, (2) early reduction of OS may prevent later serious and irreversible complications, (3) GSH deficiency is associated with OS, (4) GSH can likely reduce OS and restore adaptive physiology, (5) effective administration of GSH can be accomplished with a novel nano-product, the GSH/cyclodextrin (GC) complex. OS is an overlooked pathological process of many illnesses. Significantly, with the GSH/cyclodextrin (GC) complex, therapeutic administration of GSH is now available to reduce OS. Finally, rigorous prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this therapeutic approach.

Early-Stage Moderate Alcohol Feeding Dysregulates Insulin-Related Metabolic Hormone Expression in the Brain: Potential Links to Neurodegeneration Including Alzheimer's Disease

Background

Alzheimer's disease (AD), one of the most prevalent causes of dementia, is mainly sporadic in occurrence but driven by aging and other cofactors. Studies suggest that excessive alcohol consumption may increase AD risk.

Objective

Our study examined the degree to which short-term moderate ethanol exposure leads to molecular pathological changes of AD-type neurodegeneration.

Methods

Long Evans male and female rats were fed for 2 weeks with isocaloric liquid diets containing 24% or 0% caloric ethanol (n = 8/group). The frontal lobes were used to measure immunoreactivity to AD biomarkers, insulin-related endocrine metabolic molecules, and proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines by duplex or multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).

Results

Ethanol significantly increased frontal lobe levels of phospho-tau, but reduced Aβ, ghrelin, glucagon, leptin, PAI, IL-2, and IFN-γ.

Conclusions

Short-term effects of chronic ethanol feeding produced neuroendocrine molecular pathologic changes reflective of metabolic dysregulation, together with abnormalities that likely contribute to impairments in neuroplasticity. The findings suggest that chronic alcohol consumption rapidly establishes a platform for impairments in energy metabolism that occur in both the early stages of AD and alcohol-related brain degeneration.

In 2024, the amyloid-cascade-hypothesis still remains a working hypothesis, no less but certainly no more

The amyloid-cascade-hypothesis of the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) was introduced 32 years ago, in 1992. From early on, this clear and straight forward hypothesis received a lot of attention, but also a lot of substantial criticism. Foremost, there have always been massive doubts that a complex age-associated disorder of the most intricate organ of the human body, the brain, can be explained by a linear, one-dimensional cause-and-effect model. The amyloid-cascade defines the generation, aggregation, and deposition of the amyloid beta peptide as the central pathogenic mechanism in AD, as the ultimate trigger of the disease, and, consequently, as the key pharmacological target. Certainly, the original 1992 version of this hypothesis has been refined by various means, and the 'formulating fathers' followed up with a few reappraisals and partly very open reflections in 2002, 2006, 2009, and 2016. However, up until today, for the supporters of this hypothesis, the central and initial steps of the cascade are believed to be driven by amyloid beta-even if now displayed somewhat more elaborate. In light of the recently published clinical results achieved with anti-amyloid antibodies, the controversy in the field about (1) the clinical meaningfulness of this approach, (2) the significance of clearance of the amyloid beta peptide, and last but not least (3) the relevance of the amyloid-cascade-hypothesis is gaining momentum. This review addresses the interesting manifestation of the amyloid-cascade-hypothesis as well as its ups and downs over the decades.

Autoimmune hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: unanswered question

Alzheimer's disease (AD) was described more than a century ago. However, there are still no effective approaches to its treatment, which may suggest that the search for the cure is not being conducted in the most productive direction. AD begins as selective impairments of declarative memory with no deficits in other cognitive functions. Therefore, understanding of the AD pathogenesis has to include the understanding of this selectivity. Currently, the main efforts aimed at prevention and treatment of AD are based on the dominating hypothesis for the AD pathogenesis: the amyloid hypothesis. But this hypothesis does not explain selective memory impairments since β-amyloid accumulates extracellularly and should be toxic to all types of cerebral neurons, not only to "memory engram neurons." To explain selective memory impairment, I propose the autoimmune hypothesis of AD, based on the analysis of risk factors for AD and molecular mechanisms of memory formation. Memory formation is associated with epigenetic modifications of chromatin in memory engram neurons and, therefore, might be accompanied by the expression of memory-specific proteins recognized by the adaptive immune system as "non-self" antigens. Normally, the brain is protected by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). All risk factors for AD provoke BBB disruptions, possibly leading to an autoimmune reaction against memory engram neurons. This reaction would make them selectively sensitive to tauopathy. If this hypothesis is confirmed, the strategies for AD prevention and treatment would be radically changed.

Mechanistic Approach to Immunity and Immunotherapy of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative condition characterized by progressive cognitive decline and memory loss, affecting millions of people worldwide. Traditional treatments, such as cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists, offer limited symptomatic relief without addressing the underlying disease mechanisms. These limitations have driven the development of more potent and effective therapies. Recent advances in immunotherapy present promising avenues for AD treatment. Immunotherapy strategies, including both active and passive approaches, harness the immune system to target and mitigate AD-related pathology. Active immunotherapy stimulates the patient's immune response to produce antibodies against AD-specific antigens, while passive immunotherapy involves administering preformed antibodies or immune cells that specifically target amyloid-β (Aβ) or tau proteins. Monoclonal antibodies, such as aducanumab and lecanemab, have shown potential in reducing Aβ plaques and slowing cognitive decline in clinical trials, despite challenges related to adverse immune responses and the need for precise targeting. This comprehensive review explores the role of the immune system in AD, evaluates the current successes and limitations of immunotherapeutic approaches, and discusses future directions for enhancing the treatment efficacy.

Epitope-specific antibody fragments block aggregation of AGelD187N, an aberrant peptide in gelsolin amyloidosis

Aggregation of aberrant fragment of plasma gelsolin, AGelD187N, is a crucial event underlying the pathophysiology of Finnish gelsolin amyloidosis, an inherited form of systemic amyloidosis. The amyloidogenic gelsolin fragment AGelD187N does not play any physiological role in the body, unlike most aggregating proteins related to other protein misfolding diseases. However, no therapeutic agents that specifically and effectively target and neutralize AGelD187N exist. We used phage display technology to identify novel single-chain variable fragments that bind to different epitopes in the monomeric AGelD187N that were further maturated by variable domain shuffling and converted to antigen-binding fragment (Fab) antibodies. The generated antibody fragments had nanomolar binding affinity for full-length AGelD187N, as evaluated by biolayer interferometry. Importantly, all four Fabs selected for functional studies efficiently inhibited the amyloid formation of full-length AGelD187N as examined by thioflavin fluorescence assay and transmission electron microscopy. Two Fabs, neither of which bound to the previously proposed fibril-forming region of AGelD187N, completely blocked the amyloid formation of AGelD187N. Moreover, no small soluble aggregates, which are considered pathogenic species in protein misfolding diseases, were formed after successful inhibition of amyloid formation by the most promising aggregation inhibitor, as investigated by size-exclusion chromatography combined with multiangle light scattering. We conclude that all regions of the full-length AGelD187N are important in modulating its assembly into fibrils and that the discovered epitope-specific anti-AGelD187N antibody fragments provide a promising starting point for a disease-modifying therapy for gelsolin amyloidosis, which is currently lacking.

Donanemab, another anti-Alzheimer's drug with risk and uncertain benefit

Based on "reducing amyloid plaques in the brain", the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted accelerated and full approval for two monoclonal anti-Alzheimer's antibodies, aducanumab and lecanemab, respectively. Approval of a third antibody, donanemab, is pending. Moreover, lecanemab and donanemab are claimed to cause delay in the cognitive decline that characterizes the disease. We believe that these findings are subject to misinterpretation and statistical bias. Donanemab is claimed to cause removal of up to 86 % of cerebral amyloid and 36 % delay in cognitive decline compared to placebo. In reality, these are very small changes on an absolute scale and arguably less than what can be achieved with cholinesterase inhibitor/memantine therapy. Moreover, the "removal" of amyloid, based on the reduced accumulation of amyloid-PET tracer, most likely also reflects therapy-related tissue damage. This would also correlate with the minimal clinical effect, the increased frequency of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, and the accelerated loss of brain volume in treated compared to placebo patients observed with these antibodies. We recommend halting approvals of anti-AD antibodies until these issues are fully understood to ensure that antibody treatment does not cause more harm than benefit to patients.

Targeting aging and age-related diseases with vaccines

Aging is a major risk factor for numerous chronic diseases. Vaccination offers a promising strategy to combat these age-related diseases by targeting specific antigens and inducing immune responses. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of recent advances in vaccine-based interventions targeting these diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, type II diabetes, hypertension, abdominal aortic aneurysm, atherosclerosis, osteoarthritis, fibrosis and cancer, summarizing current approaches for identifying disease-associated antigens and inducing immune responses against these targets. Further, we reflect on the recent development of vaccines targeting senescent cells, as a strategy for more broadly targeting underlying causes of aging and associated pathologies. In addition to highlighting recent progress in these areas, we discuss important next steps to advance the therapeutic potential of these vaccines, including improving and robustly demonstrating efficacy in human clinical trials, as well as rigorously evaluating the safety and long-term effects of these vaccine strategies.

Disease-Modifying Treatments and Their Future in Alzheimer's Disease Management

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by memory impairment, a loss of cholinergic neurons, and cognitive decline that insidiously progresses to dementia. The pathoetiology of AD is complex, as genetic predisposition, age, inflammation, oxidative stress, and dysregulated proteostasis all contribute to its development and progression. The histological hallmarks of AD are the formation and accumulation of amyloid-β plaques and interfibrillar tau tangles within the central nervous system. These histological hallmarks trigger neuroinflammation and disrupt the physiological structure and functioning of neurons, leading to cognitive dysfunction. Most treatments currently available for AD focus only on symptomatic relief. Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) that target the biology of the disease in hopes of slowing or reversing disease progression are desperately needed. This narrative review investigates novel DMTs and their therapeutic targets that are either in phase three of development or have been recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The target areas of some of these novel DMTs consist of combatting amyloid or tau accumulation, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and dysregulated proteostasis, metabolism, or circadian rhythm. Neuroprotection and neuroplasticity promotion were also key target areas. DMT therapeutic target diversity may permit improved therapeutic responses in certain subpopulations of AD, particularly if the therapeutic target of the DMT being administered aligns with the subpopulation's most prominent pathological findings. Clinicians should be cognizant of how these novel drugs differ in therapeutic targets, as this knowledge may potentially enhance the level of care they can provide to AD patients in the future.

Beyond Amyloid-β: Reevaluating Its Physiological Role to Find Safe Therapies Against Alzheimer's Disease

This commentary critically examines the long-standing emphasis on amyloid-β (Aβ)-based therapies in Alzheimer's disease (AD), despite numerous clinical trial failures. It highlights the urgency to reassess research methodologies and challenges the initiation of anti-Aβ trials in preclinical stages of the disease without conclusive proofs of their safety and efficacy. Instead, a comprehensive approach that considers Aβ's physiological roles and addresses AD complex nature is suggested, encouraging the idea that clinical trial failures may result from targeting the wrong mechanism. Evidence-based scientific research is needed to advance with AD treatment, moving beyond the current conception of Aβ hypothesis.

The contribution of age-related changes in the gut-brain axis to neurological disorders

Trillions of microbes live symbiotically in the host, specifically in mucosal tissues such as the gut. Recent advances in metagenomics and metabolomics have revealed that the gut microbiota plays a critical role in the regulation of host immunity and metabolism, communicating through bidirectional interactions in the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA). The gut microbiota regulates both gut and systemic immunity and contributes to the neurodevelopment and behaviors of the host. With aging, the composition of the microbiota changes, and emerging studies have linked these shifts in microbial populations to age-related neurological diseases (NDs). Preclinical studies have demonstrated that gut microbiota-targeted therapies can improve behavioral outcomes in the host by modulating microbial, metabolomic, and immunological profiles. In this review, we discuss the pathways of brain-to-gut or gut-to-brain signaling and summarize the role of gut microbiota and microbial metabolites across the lifespan and in disease. We highlight recent studies investigating 1) microbial changes with aging; 2) how aging of the maternal microbiome can affect offspring health; and 3) the contribution of the microbiome to both chronic age-related diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloidosis), and acute brain injury, including ischemic stroke and traumatic brain injury.

Navigating the Alzheimer's Treatment Landscape: Unraveling Amyloid-beta Complexities and Pioneering Precision Medicine Approaches

A variety of cutting-edge methods and good knowledge of the illness's complex causes are causing a sea change in the field of Alzheimer's Disease (A.D.) research and treatment. Precision medicine is at the vanguard of this change, where individualized treatment plans based on genetic and biomarker profiles give a ray of hope for customized therapeutics. Combination therapies are becoming increasingly popular as a way to address the multifaceted pathology of Alzheimer's by simultaneously attacking Aβ plaques, tau tangles, neuroinflammation, and other factors. The article covers several therapeutic design efforts, including BACE inhibitors, gamma- secretase modulators, monoclonal antibodies (e.g., Aducanumab and Lecanemab), and anti- Aβ vaccinations. While these techniques appear promising, clinical development faces safety concerns and uneven efficacy. To address the complicated Aβ pathology in Alzheimer's disease, a multimodal approach is necessary. The statement emphasizes the continued importance of clinical trials in addressing safety and efficacy concerns. Looking ahead, it suggests that future treatments may take into account genetic and biomarker traits in order to provide more personalized care. Therapies targeting Aβ, tau tangles, neuroinflammation, and novel drug delivery modalities are planned. Nanoparticles and gene therapies are only two examples of novel drug delivery methods that have the potential to deliver treatments more effectively, with fewer side effects, and with better therapeutic results. In addition, medicines that target tau proteins in addition to Aβ are in the works. Early intervention, based on precise biomarkers, is a linchpin of Alzheimer's care, emphasizing the critical need for detecting the disease at its earliest stages. Lifestyle interventions, encompassing diet, exercise, cognitive training, and social engagement, are emerging as key components in the fight against cognitive decline. Data analytics and art are gaining prominence as strategies to mitigate the brain's inflammatory responses. To pool knowledge and resources in the fight against Alzheimer's, international cooperation between scientists, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies is still essential. In essence, a complex, individualized, and collaborative strategy will characterize Alzheimer's research and therapy in the future. Despite obstacles, these encouraging possibilities show the ongoing commitment of the scientific and medical communities to combat A.D. head-on, providing a glimmer of hope to the countless people and families touched by this savage sickness.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative condition marked by the progressive deterioration of cognitive abilities, memory impairment, and the accumulation of abnormal proteins, specifically beta-amyloid plaques and tau tangles, within the brain. Despite extensive research efforts, Alzheimer's disease remains without a cure, presenting a significant global healthcare challenge. Recently, there has been an increased focus on antibody-based treatments as a potentially effective method for dealing with Alzheimer's disease. This paper offers a comprehensive overview of the current status of research on antibody-based molecules as therapies for Alzheimer's disease. We will briefly mention their mechanisms of action, therapeutic efficacy, and safety profiles while addressing the challenges and limitations encountered during their development. We also highlight some crucial considerations in antibody-based treatment development, including patient selection criteria, dosing regimens, or safety concerns. In conclusion, antibody-based therapies present a hopeful outlook for addressing Alzheimer's disease. While challenges remain, the accumulating evidence suggests that these therapies may offer substantial promise in ameliorating or preventing the progression of this debilitating condition, thus potentially enhancing the quality of life for the millions of individuals and families affected by Alzheimer's disease worldwide.

Passive Alzheimer's immunotherapy: A promising or uncertain option?

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s recent accelerated approval of two anti-amyloid antibodies for treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD), aducanumab and lecanemab, has caused substantial debate. To inform this debate, we reviewed the literature on randomized clinical trials conducted with eight such antibodies focusing on clinical efficacy, cerebral amyloid removal, amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs) and cerebral volumes to the extent such measurements have been reported. Two antibodies, donanemab and lecanemab, have demonstrated clinical efficacy, but these results remain uncertain. We further argue that the decreased amyloid PET signal in these trials is unlikely to be a one-to-one reflection of amyloid removal, but rather a reflection of increased therapy-related brain damage, as supported by the increased incidence of ARIAs and reported loss of brain volume. Due to these uncertainties of benefit and risk, we recommend that the FDA pauses existing approvals and approval of new antibodies until results of phase 4 studies with these drugs are available to inform on these risk-benefit uncertainties. We recommend that the FDA prioritize FDG PET and detection of ARIAs and accelerated brain volume loss with MRI in all trial patients, and neuropathological examination of all patients who die in these phase 4 trials.

Effects of three kinds of anti-amyloid-β drugs on clinical, biomarker, neuroimaging outcomes and safety indexes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II/III clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of the three kinds of anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) drugs on cognitive and other functions, fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers, and safety on patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and rank the three kinds of anti-Aβ drugs.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and AlzForum from inception to January 21, 2023 to include randomized controlled clinical trials. Random effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one clinical trials (20929 participants, 9167 male) were included. Anti-Aβ drugs had significant but relatively low efficacy in preventing cognitive decline (ADAS-Cog SMD -0.07, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.03, p < 0.001; CDR-SOB -0.05, -0.09 to -0.01, p = 0.017). Instrumental variable meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis confirmed the reliability of the pooled estimation. Beneficial effects were also observed by assessing other cognitive and activity of daily living scales and biomarkers, with acceptable safety of anti-Aβ drugs. Meta-regression demonstrated significant association between higher baseline mini-mental statement examination scores (MMSE) and better cognitive protective effects on cognitive function (ADAS-Cog β: -0.02, -0.05 to 0.00, p = 0.017) and clearance of pathological productions of anti-Aβ drugs. Network meta-analysis ranked the passive immunotherapy drugs to have the best cognitive efficacy, followed by active immunotherapy and small molecule drugs.

CONCLUSION

Anti-Aβ drugs have relatively low efficacy in preventing cognitive decline, and they reduce pathological productions with acceptable safety. Patients with higher baseline MMSE scores benefit more from anti-Aβ drugs. Passive immunotherapy anti-Aβ drugs show relatively better efficacy than active immunotherapy and small molecule anti-Aβ drugs.

Alzheimer's Disease Treatment: The Search for a Breakthrough

As the search for modalities to cure Alzheimer's disease (AD) has made slow progress, research has now turned to innovative pathways involving neural and peripheral inflammation and neuro-regeneration. Widely used AD treatments provide only symptomatic relief without changing the disease course. The recently FDA-approved anti-amyloid drugs, aducanumab and lecanemab, have demonstrated unclear real-world efficacy with a substantial side effect profile. Interest is growing in targeting the early stages of AD before irreversible pathologic changes so that cognitive function and neuronal viability can be preserved. Neuroinflammation is a fundamental feature of AD that involves complex relationships among cerebral immune cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which could be altered pharmacologically by AD therapy. Here, we provide an overview of the manipulations attempted in pre-clinical experiments. These include inhibition of microglial receptors, attenuation of inflammation and enhancement of toxin-clearing autophagy. In addition, modulation of the microbiome-brain-gut axis, dietary changes, and increased mental and physical exercise are under evaluation as ways to optimize brain health. As the scientific and medical communities work together, new solutions may be on the horizon to slow or halt AD progression.

Malignant Brain Aging: The Formidable Link Between Dysregulated Signaling Through Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Pathways and Alzheimer's Disease (Type 3 Diabetes)

Malignant brain aging corresponds to accelerated age-related declines in brain functions eventually derailing the self-sustaining forces that govern independent vitality. Malignant brain aging establishes the path toward dementing neurodegeneration, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). The full spectrum of AD includes progressive dysfunction of neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, microglia, and the microvascular systems, and is mechanistically driven by insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) deficiencies and resistances with accompanying deficits in energy balance, increased cellular stress, inflammation, and impaired perfusion, mimicking the core features of diabetes mellitus. The underlying pathophysiological derangements result in mitochondrial dysfunction, abnormal protein aggregation, increased oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress, aberrant autophagy, and abnormal post-translational modification of proteins, all of which are signature features of both AD and dysregulated insulin/IGF-1-mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. This article connects the dots from benign to malignant aging to neurodegeneration by reviewing the salient pathologies associated with initially adaptive and later dysfunctional mTOR signaling in the brain. Effective therapeutic and preventive measures must be two-pronged and designed to 1) address complex and shifting impairments in mTOR signaling through the re-purpose of effective anti-diabetes therapeutics that target the brain, and 2) minimize the impact of extrinsic mediators of benign to malignant aging transitions, e.g., inflammatory states, obesity, systemic insulin resistance diseases, and repeated bouts of general anesthesia, by minimizing exposures or implementing neuroprotective measures.