1
|
Reese R, Koeglsperger T, Schrader C, Tönges L, Deuschl G, Kühn AA, Krack P, Schnitzler A, Storch A, Trenkwalder C, Höglinger GU. Invasive therapies for Parkinson's disease: an adapted excerpt from the guidelines of the German Society of Neurology. J Neurol 2025; 272:219. [PMID: 39985674 PMCID: PMC11846738 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-12915-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2024] [Revised: 01/07/2025] [Accepted: 01/12/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by hypokinetic motor symptoms, tremor, and various non-motor symptoms with frequent fluctuations of symptoms in advanced disease stages. Invasive therapies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), ablative therapies, and continuous subcutaneous or intrajejunal delivery of dopaminergic drugs via pump therapies are available for the management of this complex motor symptomatology and may also impact non-motor symptoms. The recent update of the clinical guideline on PD by the German Neurological Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie e.V.; DGN) offers clear guidance on the indications and applications of these treatment options. METHODS The guideline committee formulated diagnostic questions for invasive therapies and structured them according to the PICOS framework (Population-Intervention-Comparisons-Outcome-Studies). A systematic literature review was conducted. Questions were addressed using the findings from the literature review and consented by the guideline committee. RESULTS Specific recommendations are given regarding (i) the optimal timing for starting invasive therapies, (ii) the application of DBS, (iii) the use of pump therapies in advanced PD, (iv) the indications for ablative procedures, and (iv) selecting the most appropriate therapy according to individual patient characteristics. CONCLUSION This review is an adapted excerpt of the chapters on the use of invasive therapies in PD of the novel German guideline on PD. Clear recommendations on the use of treatment options for advanced PD are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Reese
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
| | - Thomas Koeglsperger
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Lars Tönges
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Neurodegeneration Research, Protein Research Unit Ruhr (PURE), Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Krack
- Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, University Hospital (Inselspital) and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
- Center for Transdisciplinary Neurosciences Rostock (CTNR), Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | - Claudia Trenkwalder
- Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik, Kassel, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Günter U Höglinger
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herbozo Contreras LF, Truong ND, Eshraghian JK, Xu Z, Huang Z, Bersani–Veroni TV, Aguilar I, Leung WH, Nikpour A, Kavehei O. Neuromorphic neuromodulation: Towards the next generation of closed-loop neurostimulation. PNAS NEXUS 2024; 3:pgae488. [PMID: 39554511 PMCID: PMC11565243 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Neuromodulation techniques have emerged as promising approaches for treating a wide range of neurological disorders, precisely delivering electrical stimulation to modulate abnormal neuronal activity. While leveraging the unique capabilities of AI holds immense potential for responsive neurostimulation, it appears as an extremely challenging proposition where real-time (low-latency) processing, low-power consumption, and heat constraints are limiting factors. The use of sophisticated AI-driven models for personalized neurostimulation depends on the back-telemetry of data to external systems (e.g. cloud-based medical mesosystems and ecosystems). While this can be a solution, integrating continuous learning within implantable neuromodulation devices for several applications, such as seizure prediction in epilepsy, is an open question. We believe neuromorphic architectures hold an outstanding potential to open new avenues for sophisticated on-chip analysis of neural signals and AI-driven personalized treatments. With more than three orders of magnitude reduction in the total data required for data processing and feature extraction, the high power- and memory-efficiency of neuromorphic computing to hardware-firmware co-design can be considered as the solution-in-the-making to resource-constraint implantable neuromodulation systems. This perspective introduces the concept of Neuromorphic Neuromodulation, a new breed of closed-loop responsive feedback system. It highlights its potential to revolutionize implantable brain-machine microsystems for patient-specific treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nhan Duy Truong
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jason K Eshraghian
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064, USA
| | - Zhangyu Xu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Zhaojing Huang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | | | - Isabelle Aguilar
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Wing Hang Leung
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Omid Kavehei
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koivu M, Sihvonen AJ, Eerola-Rautio J, Pauls KAM, Resendiz-Nieves J, Vartiainen N, Kivisaari R, Scheperjans F, Pekkonen E. Clinical and Brain Morphometry Predictors of Deep Brain Stimulation Outcome in Parkinson's Disease. Brain Topogr 2024; 37:1186-1194. [PMID: 38662300 PMCID: PMC11408547 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01054-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is known to improve motor function in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and to enable a reduction of anti-parkinsonian medication. While the levodopa challenge test and disease duration are considered good predictors of STN-DBS outcome, other clinical and neuroanatomical predictors are less established. This study aimed to evaluate, in addition to clinical predictors, the effect of patients' individual brain topography on DBS outcome. The medical records of 35 PD patients were used to analyze DBS outcomes measured with the following scales: Part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) off medication at baseline, and at 6-months during medication off and stimulation on, use of anti-parkinsonian medication (LED), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) and Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMS-Quest). Furthermore, preoperative brain MRI images were utilized to analyze the brain morphology in relation to STN-DBS outcome. With STN-DBS, a 44% reduction in the UPDRS-III score and a 43% decrease in the LED were observed (p<0.001). Dyskinesia and non-motor symptoms decreased significantly [median reductions of 78,6% (IQR 45,5%) and 18,4% (IQR 32,2%) respectively, p=0.001 - 0.047]. Along with the levodopa challenge test, patients' age correlated with the observed DBS outcome measured as UPDRS-III improvement (ρ= -0.466 - -0.521, p<0.005). Patients with greater LED decline had lower grey matter volumes in left superior medial frontal gyrus, in supplementary motor area and cingulum bilaterally. Additionally, patients with greater UPDRS-III score improvement had lower grey matter volume in similar grey matter areas. These findings remained significant when adjusted for sex, age, baseline LED and UPDRS scores respectively and for total intracranial volume (p=0.0041- 0.001). However, only the LED decrease finding remained significant when the analyses were further controlled for stimulation amplitude. It appears that along with the clinical predictors of STN-DBS outcome, individual patient topographic differences may influence DBS outcome. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT06095245, registration date October 23, 2023, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maija Koivu
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Aleksi J Sihvonen
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland
- Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Eerola-Rautio
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Amande M Pauls
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Nuutti Vartiainen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Riku Kivisaari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Filip Scheperjans
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Pekkonen
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Butola M, Nainwal N. Non-Invasive Techniques of Nose to Brain Delivery Using Nanoparticulate Carriers: Hopes and Hurdles. AAPS PharmSciTech 2024; 25:256. [PMID: 39477829 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-024-02946-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 09/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Intranasal drug delivery route has emerged as a promising non-invasive method of administering drugs directly to the brain, bypassing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers (BCSF). BBB and BCSF prevent many therapeutic molecules from entering the brain. Intranasal drug delivery can transport drugs from the nasal mucosa to the brain, to treat a variety of Central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Intranasal drug delivery provides advantages over invasive drug delivery techniques such as intrathecal or intraparenchymal which can cause infection. Many strategies, including nanocarriers liposomes, solid-lipid NPs, nano-emulsion, nanostructured lipid carriers, dendrimers, exosomes, metal NPs, nano micelles, and quantum dots, are effective in nose-to-brain drug transport. However, the biggest obstacles to the nose-to-brain delivery of drugs include mucociliary clearance, poor drug retention, enzymatic degradation, poor permeability, bioavailability, and naso-mucosal toxicity. The current review aims to compile current approaches for drug delivery to the CNS via the nose, focusing on nanotherapeutics and nasal devices. Along with a brief overview of the related pathways or mechanisms, it also covers the advantages of nasal drug delivery as a potential method of drug administration. It also offers several possibilities to improve drug penetration across the nasal barrier. This article overviews various in-vitro, ex-vivo, and in-vivo techniques to assess drug transport from the nasal epithelium into the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansi Butola
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Uttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248001, India
| | - Nidhi Nainwal
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Uttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248001, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Popova M, Messé A, Gulberti A, Gerloff C, Pötter-Nerger M, Hilgetag CC. The effect of deep brain stimulation on cortico-subcortical networks in Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait: Exhaustive exploration of a basic model. Netw Neurosci 2024; 8:926-945. [PMID: 39355431 PMCID: PMC11424038 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Current treatments of Parkinson's disease (PD) have limited efficacy in alleviating freezing of gait (FoG). In this context, concomitant deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) has been suggested as a potential therapeutic approach. However, the mechanisms underlying this approach are unknown. While the current rationale relies on network-based hypotheses of intensified disinhibition of brainstem locomotor areas to facilitate the release of gait motor programs, it is still unclear how simultaneous high-frequency DBS in two interconnected basal ganglia nuclei affects large-scale cortico-subcortical network activity. Here, we use a basic model of neural excitation, the susceptible-excited-refractory (SER) model, to compare effects of different stimulation modes of the network underlying FoG based on the mouse brain connectivity atlas. We develop a network-based computational framework to compare subcortical DBS targets through exhaustive analysis of the brain attractor dynamics in the healthy, PD, and DBS states. We show that combined STN+SNr DBS outperforms STN DBS in terms of the normalization of spike propagation flow in the FoG network. The framework aims to move toward a mechanistic understanding of the network effects of DBS and may be applicable to further perturbation-based therapies of brain disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariia Popova
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arnaud Messé
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Gulberti
- Department of Neurology, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gerloff
- Department of Neurology, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Department of Neurology, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claus C. Hilgetag
- Institute of Computational Neuroscience, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Statz M, Weber H, Weis F, Kober M, Bathel H, Plocksties F, van Rienen U, Timmermann D, Storch A, Fauser M. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation induces functional deficits in norepinephrinergic neurotransmission in a Parkinson's disease model. Brain Res 2024; 1841:149128. [PMID: 39053685 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is a successful treatment option in Parkinson's disease (PD) for different motor and non-motor symptoms, but has been linked to postoperative cognitive impairment. AIM Since both dopaminergic and norepinephrinergic neurotransmissions play important roles in symptom development, we analysed STN-DBS effects on dopamine and norepinephrine availability in different brain regions and morphological alterations of catecholaminergic neurons in the 6-hydroxydopamine PD rat model. METHODS We applied one week of continuous unilateral STN-DBS or sham stimulation, respectively, in groups of healthy and 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats to quantify dopamine and norepinephrine contents in the striatum, olfactory bulb and dentate gyrus. In addition, we analysed dopaminergic cell counts in the substantia nigra pars compacta and area tegmentalis ventralis and norepinephrinergic neurons in the locus coeruleus after one and six weeks of STN-DBS. RESULTS In 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned animals, one week of STN-DBS did not alter dopamine levels, while striatal norepinephrine levels were decreased. However, neither one nor six weeks of STN-DBS altered dopaminergic neuron numbers in the midbrain or norepinephrinergic neuron counts in the locus coeruleus. Dopaminergic fibre density in the dorsal and ventral striatum also remained unchanged after six weeks of STN-DBS. In healthy animals, one week of STN-DBS resulted in increased dopamine levels in the olfactory bulb and decreased contents in the dentate gyrus, but had no effects on norepinephrine availability. CONCLUSIONS STN-DBS modulates striatal norepinephrinergic neurotransmission in a PD rat model. Additional behavioural studies are required to investigate the functional impact of this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meike Statz
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Hanna Weber
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Frederike Weis
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Maria Kober
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Henning Bathel
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
| | - Franz Plocksties
- Institute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
| | - Ursula van Rienen
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany; Department Life, Light and Matter, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany; Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, Interdisciplinary Faculty, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
| | - Dirk Timmermann
- Institute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany
| | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany; German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Mareike Fauser
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Izzo A, Piano C, D'Ercole M, D'Alessandris QG, Tufo T, Fuggetta MF, Figà F, Martinelli R, Obersnel M, Pambianco F, Bove F, Perotti V, Bentivoglio AR, Olivi A, Montano N. Intraoperative microelectrode recording during asleep deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson Disease. A case series with systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:342. [PMID: 39031226 PMCID: PMC11271364 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02563-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024]
Abstract
The use of microelectrode recording (MER) during deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson Disease is controversial. Furthermore, in asleep DBS anesthesia can impair the ability to record single-cell electric activity.The purpose of this study was to describe our surgical and anesthesiologic protocol for MER assessment during asleep subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS and to put our findings in the context of a systematic review of the literature. Sixty-three STN electrodes were implanted in 32 patients under general anesthesia. A frameless technique using O-Arm scanning was adopted in all cases. Total intravenous anesthesia, monitored with bispectral index, was administered using a target controlled infusion of both propofol and remifentanil. A systematic review of the literature with metanalysis on MER in asleep vs awake STN DBS for Parkinson Disease was performed. In our series, MER could be reliably recorded in all cases, impacting profoundly on electrode positioning: the final position was located within 2 mm from the planned target only in 42.9% cases. Depth modification > 2 mm was necessary in 21 cases (33.3%), while in 15 cases (23.8%) a different track was used. At 1-year follow-up we observed a significant reduction in LEDD, UPDRS Part III score off-medications, and UPDRS Part III score on medications, as compared to baseline. The systematic review of the literature yielded 23 papers; adding the cases here reported, overall 1258 asleep DBS cases using MER are described. This technique was safe and effective: metanalysis showed similar, if not better, outcome of asleep vs awake patients operated using MER. MER are a useful and reliable tool during asleep STN DBS, leading to a fine tuning of electrode position in the majority of cases. Collaboration between neurosurgeon, neurophysiologist and neuroanesthesiologist is crucial, since slight modifications of sedation level can impact profoundly on MER reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Izzo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Carla Piano
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- Department of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Manuela D'Ercole
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Quintino Giorgio D'Alessandris
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
| | - Tommaso Tufo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Maria Filomena Fuggetta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Federica Figà
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Renata Martinelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Marco Obersnel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Francesco Pambianco
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Francesco Bove
- Department of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Valerio Perotti
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Bentivoglio
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- Department of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Alessandro Olivi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Nicola Montano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fauser M, Payonk JP, Weber H, Statz M, Winter C, Hadar R, Appali R, van Rienen U, Brandt MD, Storch A. Subthalamic nucleus but not entopeduncular nucleus deep brain stimulation enhances neurogenesis in the SVZ-olfactory bulb system of Parkinsonian rats. Front Cell Neurosci 2024; 18:1396780. [PMID: 38746080 PMCID: PMC11091264 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1396780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly effective treatment option in Parkinson's disease. However, the underlying mechanisms of action, particularly effects on neuronal plasticity, remain enigmatic. Adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone-olfactory bulb (SVZ-OB) axis and in the dentate gyrus (DG) has been linked to various non-motor symptoms in PD, e.g., memory deficits and olfactory dysfunction. Since DBS affects several of these non-motor symptoms, we analyzed the effects of DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the entopeduncular nucleus (EPN) on neurogenesis in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned hemiparkinsonian rats. Methods In our study, we applied five weeks of continuous bilateral STN-DBS or EPN-DBS in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with stable dopaminergic deficits compared to 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with corresponding sham stimulation. We injected two thymidine analogs to quantify newborn neurons early after DBS onset and three weeks later. Immunohistochemistry identified newborn cells co-labeled with NeuN, TH and GABA within the OB and DG. As a putative mechanism, we simulated the electric field distribution depending on the stimulation site to analyze direct electric effects on neural stem cell proliferation. Results STN-DBS persistently increased the number of newborn dopaminergic and GABAergic neurons in the OB but not in the DG, while EPN-DBS does not impact neurogenesis. These effects do not seem to be mediated via direct electric stimulation of neural stem/progenitor cells within the neurogenic niches. Discussion Our data support target-specific effects of STN-DBS on adult neurogenesis, a putative modulator of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike Fauser
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jan Philipp Payonk
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hanna Weber
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Meike Statz
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Christine Winter
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ravit Hadar
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Revathi Appali
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ursula van Rienen
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Life, Light and Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Moritz D. Brandt
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tian Y, Saradhi S, Bello E, Johnson MD, D’Eleuterio G, Popovic MR, Lankarany M. Model-based closed-loop control of thalamic deep brain stimulation. FRONTIERS IN NETWORK PHYSIOLOGY 2024; 4:1356653. [PMID: 38650608 PMCID: PMC11033853 DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2024.1356653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: Closed-loop control of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is beneficial for effective and automatic treatment of various neurological disorders like Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). Manual (open-loop) DBS programming solely based on clinical observations relies on neurologists' expertise and patients' experience. Continuous stimulation in open-loop DBS may decrease battery life and cause side effects. On the contrary, a closed-loop DBS system uses a feedback biomarker/signal to track worsening (or improving) of patients' symptoms and offers several advantages compared to the open-loop DBS system. Existing closed-loop DBS control systems do not incorporate physiological mechanisms underlying DBS or symptoms, e.g., how DBS modulates dynamics of synaptic plasticity. Methods: In this work, we propose a computational framework for development of a model-based DBS controller where a neural model can describe the relationship between DBS and neural activity and a polynomial-based approximation can estimate the relationship between neural and behavioral activities. A controller is used in our model in a quasi-real-time manner to find DBS patterns that significantly reduce the worsening of symptoms. By using the proposed computational framework, these DBS patterns can be tested clinically by predicting the effect of DBS before delivering it to the patient. We applied this framework to the problem of finding optimal DBS frequencies for essential tremor given electromyography (EMG) recordings solely. Building on our recent network model of ventral intermediate nuclei (Vim), the main surgical target of the tremor, in response to DBS, we developed neural model simulation in which physiological mechanisms underlying Vim-DBS are linked to symptomatic changes in EMG signals. By using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, we showed that a closed-loop system can track EMG signals and adjust the stimulation frequency of Vim-DBS so that the power of EMG reaches a desired control target. Results and discussion: We demonstrated that the model-based DBS frequency aligns well with that used in clinical studies. Our model-based closed-loop system is adaptable to different control targets and can potentially be used for different diseases and personalized systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Tian
- Krembil Brain Institute—University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikar Saradhi
- Krembil Brain Institute—University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Edward Bello
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Matthew D. Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Milos R. Popovic
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milad Lankarany
- Krembil Brain Institute—University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mishra A, Unadkat P, McBriar JD, Schulder M, Ramdhani RA. An Institutional Experience of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation and a Review of the Literature. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:544-550. [PMID: 36658078 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Directional deep brain stimulation (dDBS) has been suggested to have a similar therapeutic effect when compared with the traditional omnidirectional DBS, but with an improved therapeutic window that yields optimized clinical effect owing to the ability to better direct, or "steer," electric current. We present our single-center, retrospective analysis of our experience in the use of dDBS in patients with movement disorders and provide a review of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified all patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) who received a dDBS system between 2018 and 2022 and retrospectively examined characteristics of their longitudinal treatment. A total of 70 leads were identified across 42 patients (28 PD, 14 ET). RESULTS Three types of systems were implemented (single-segment activation, 45.2% of patients; multiple independent current control, 50.0%; and local field potential sensing-enabled, 4.7%). The subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus was targeted in PD, and the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in ET. Across the entire cohort (n = 70 leads), at initial programming, 54.2% of leads (n = 38) were programmed using directional stimulation. At the most recent reprogramming, 58.6% of leads (n = 41) implemented directionality. In patients with PD, the average decrease in levodopa-equivalent daily dose at six months after implantation was 35.4% ± 39.2%. Despite the ability to steer current to relieve stimulation-induced side effects, ten leads in six patients required surgical revision owing to electrode malposition. CONCLUSIONS We show wide adaptability and implementation of directional stimulation, adding to the growing compendium of real-world uses of dDBS therapy. We used directionality to improve clinical response in both patients with PD and patients with ET and found that its programming flexibility was used at high rates long after implantation and initial programming. In patients with PD, dDBS led to a significant reduction in dopaminergic medication, suggesting sustained clinical improvement. Nonetheless, accurate surgical placement remains necessary to ensure optimal clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akash Mishra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Prashin Unadkat
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA; Elmezzi Graduate School of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Joshua D McBriar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Michael Schulder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Ritesh A Ramdhani
- Department of Neurology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cavallieri F, Mulroy E, Moro E. The history of deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2024; 121:105980. [PMID: 38161106 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is an established and effective treatment for several movement disorders (tremor, Parkinson's disease, and dystonia), and is under investigation in numerous other neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, the origins and development of this neurofunctional technique are not always well understood and recognized. In this mini-review, we review the history of DBS, highlighting important milestones and the most remarkable protagonists (neurosurgeons, neurologists, and neurophysiologists) who pioneered and fostered this therapy throughout the 20th and early 21st century. Alongside DBS historical markers, we also briefly discuss newer developments in the field, and the future challenges which accompany such progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor & Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Eoin Mulroy
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cavallieri F, Ghirotto L, Sireci F, Parmeggiani M, Pedroni C, Mardones FA, Bassi MC, Fioravanti V, Fraix V, Moro E, Valzania F. Caregivers' burden and deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16149. [PMID: 37975788 PMCID: PMC11235895 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The impact of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on caregivers' burden is understudied. We perform a systematic review and meta-synthesis aggregating qualitative studies involving partners of people with Parkinson disease (PwP) to explore their experiences and unmet needs. METHODS A systematic review for retrieving qualitative studies included six databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) studies on the experience of caregivers of PwP in the context of STN-DBS, (ii) English peer-reviewed articles, and (iii) qualitative or mixed methods studies reporting caregivers' quotations. After the appraisal of included studies, we performed meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Descriptive themes and conceptual elements related to PwP partners' experiences and unmet needs were generated. RESULTS A total of 1108 articles were screened, and nine articles were included. Three categories were identified: (i) dealing with Parkinson disease (PD) every day (the starting situation characterized by the impact of PD on ordinary life; the limitations to partners' socialization; partners' efforts in stepping aside for love and care activities), (ii) facing life changes with STN-DBS (the feeling of being unprepared for changes; the fear and concern due to loved ones' behavioral changes; struggling to find an explanation for those changes), and (iii) rebuilding the role of caregiver and partner after STN-DBS. CONCLUSIONS This meta-synthesis elucidates concerns, challenges, and unmet needs of partners of PwP who underwent STN-DBS. It is important to provide them with information, education, and adequate support to face these challenges. Professionals need to involve partners in the care and decision process, because STN-DBS-related outcomes do not depend solely on the well-being of PwP but also on the well-being of individuals surrounding them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation DepartmentAzienda USL–IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| | - Luca Ghirotto
- Qualitative Research UnitAzienda USL–IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| | - Francesca Sireci
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation DepartmentAzienda USL–IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| | - Margherita Parmeggiani
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation DepartmentAzienda USL–IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| | - Cristina Pedroni
- Direzione delle Professioni Sanitarie Azienda USL–IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| | | | | | - Valentina Fioravanti
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation DepartmentAzienda USL–IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| | - Valérie Fraix
- Division of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of NeuroscienceGrenoble Alpes UniversityGrenobleFrance
| | - Elena Moro
- Division of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of NeuroscienceGrenoble Alpes UniversityGrenobleFrance
| | - Franco Valzania
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation DepartmentAzienda USL–IRCCS di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Genovese D, Bove F, Rigon L, Tufo T, Izzo A, Calabresi P, Bentivoglio AR, Piano C. Long-term safety and efficacy of frameless subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:565-572. [PMID: 37700176 PMCID: PMC10791817 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07059-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is standard of care for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and a correct lead placement is crucial to obtain good clinical outcomes. Evidence demonstrating the targeting accuracy of the frameless technique for DBS, along with the advantages for patients and clinicians, is solid, while data reporting long-term clinical outcomes for PD patients are still lacking. OBJECTIVES The study aims to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of frameless bilateral STN-DBS in PD patients at 5 years from surgery. METHODS Consecutive PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS with a frameless system were included in this single-center retrospective study. Clinical features, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in its total motor score and axial sub-scores, and pharmacological regimen were assessed at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. The adverse events related to the procedure, stimulation, or the presence of the hardware were systematically collected. RESULTS Forty-one PD patients undergone bilateral STN-DBS implantation were included in the study and fifteen patients already completed the 5-year observation. No complications occurred during surgery and the perioperative phase, and no unexpected serious adverse event occurred during the entire follow-up period. At 5 years from surgery, there was a sustained motor efficacy of STN stimulation: STN-DBS significantly improved the off-stim UPDRS III score at 5 years by 37.6% (P < 0.001), while the dopaminergic medications remained significantly reduced compared to baseline (- 21.6% versus baseline LEDD; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS Our data support the use of the frameless system for STN-DBS in PD patients, as a safe and well-tolerated technique, with long-term clinical benefits and persistent motor efficacy at 5 years from the surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Genovese
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Neurology, The Marlene and Paolo Fresco Institute for Parkinson's and Movement Disorders, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francesco Bove
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Leonardo Rigon
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Tufo
- Neurosurgery Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Izzo
- Neurosurgery Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Bentivoglio
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Carla Piano
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Ieso S, Di Rauso G, Cavallieri F, Beltrami D, Marti A, Napoli M, Pascarella R, Feletti A, Fioravanti V, Toschi G, Rispoli V, Antonelli F, Puzzolante A, Pavesi G, Gasparini F, Valzania F. Longitudinal Neuropsychological Assessment of Symptomatic Edema after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Case Series Study. Neurol Int 2023; 16:62-73. [PMID: 38251052 PMCID: PMC10801618 DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Severe non-infectious or non-haemorrhagic brain edema surrounding the electrode represents a rare complication of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) surgery. The aim of this study is to report three patients with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) who developed symptomatic brain edema after STN-DBS surgery treated with intravenous steroids with a specific profile of reversible cognitive alterations. Patients were both assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery including attention, memory, visuo-spatial and executive tasks. They were also briefly assessed for emotional and behavioural alterations, and for possible limitations in the activities of daily living. Normative data for an Italian population were available for all neuropsychological tests. The patients were firstly assessed before the surgery (baseline) as soon as they became symptomatic for the post-surgery edema and a few more times in follow-up up to ten months. In all patients we observed the resolution of cognitive deficits within six months after surgery with the corresponding reabsorption of edema at brain CT scans. The appearance of post-DBS edema is a fairly frequent and clinically benign event. However, in some rare cases it can be very marked and lead to important clinical-albeit transient-disturbances. These events can compromise, at least from a psychological point of view, the delicate path of patients who undergo DBS and can prolong the post-operative hospital stay. In this setting it could be helpful to perform a brain CT scan in 2-3 days with the aim of detecting the early appearance of edema and treating it before it can constitute a relevant clinical problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia De Ieso
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
- Clinical Neuropsychology, Cognitive Disorders and Dyslexia Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giulia Di Rauso
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41126 Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
| | - Daniela Beltrami
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
- Clinical Neuropsychology, Cognitive Disorders and Dyslexia Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marti
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
- Clinical Neuropsychology, Cognitive Disorders and Dyslexia Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Manuela Napoli
- Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.N.); (R.P.)
| | - Rosario Pascarella
- Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.N.); (R.P.)
| | - Alberto Feletti
- Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, 41126 Modena, Italy; (A.F.); (A.P.); (G.P.)
- Neurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Fioravanti
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
| | - Giulia Toschi
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
| | - Vittorio Rispoli
- Neurology Unit, Neuroscience Head Neck Department, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41126 Modena, Italy; (V.R.); (F.A.)
| | - Francesca Antonelli
- Neurology Unit, Neuroscience Head Neck Department, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, 41126 Modena, Italy; (V.R.); (F.A.)
| | - Annette Puzzolante
- Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, 41126 Modena, Italy; (A.F.); (A.P.); (G.P.)
| | - Giacomo Pavesi
- Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, 41126 Modena, Italy; (A.F.); (A.P.); (G.P.)
- Neurosurgery Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Federico Gasparini
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
- Clinical Neuropsychology, Cognitive Disorders and Dyslexia Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Franco Valzania
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (S.D.I.); (G.D.R.); (D.B.); (A.M.); (V.F.); (G.T.); (F.G.); (F.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
di Biase L, Piano C, Bove F, Ricci L, Caminiti ML, Stefani A, Viselli F, Modugno N, Cerroni R, Calabresi P, Bentivoglio AR, Tufo T, Di Lazzaro V. Intraoperative Local Field Potential Beta Power and Three-Dimensional Neuroimaging Mapping Predict Long-Term Clinical Response to Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: A Retrospective Study. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1724-1732. [PMID: 36774326 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads allow a fine-tuning control of the stimulation field, however, this new technology could increase the DBS programming time because of the higher number of the possible combinations used in directional DBS than in standard nondirectional electrodes. Neuroimaging leads localization techniques and local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from DBS electrodes implanted in basal ganglia are among the most studied biomarkers for DBS programing. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate whether intraoperative LFPs beta power and neuroimaging reconstructions correlate with contact selection in clinical programming of DBS in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, routine intraoperative LFPs recorded from all contacts in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) of 14 patients with PD were analyzed to calculate the beta band power for each contact. Neuroimaging reconstruction obtained through Brainlab Elements Planning software detected contacts localized within the STN. Clinical DBS programming contact scheme data were collected after one year from the implant. Statistical analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of LFPs beta band power and neuroimaging data for identification of the contacts selected with clinical programming. We evaluated whether the most effective contacts identified based on the clinical response after one year from implant were also those with the highest level of beta activity and localized within the STN in neuroimaging reconstruction. RESULTS LFPs beta power showed a sensitivity of 67%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 84%, a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 2.7 in predicting the most effective contacts as evaluated through the clinical response. Neuroimaging reconstructions showed a sensitivity of 62%, a NPV of 77%, a DOR of 1.20 for contact effectivity prediction. The combined use of the two methods showed a sensitivity of 87%, a NPV of 87%, a DOR of 2.7 for predicting the clinically more effective contacts. CONCLUSIONS The combined use of LFPs beta power and neuroimaging localization and segmentations predict which are the most effective contacts as selected on the basis of clinical programming after one year from implant of DBS. The use of predictors in contact selection could guide clinical programming and reduce time needed for it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazzaro di Biase
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy; Operative Research Unit of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy; Brain Innovations Lab, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Álvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy.
| | - Carla Piano
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Bove
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Ricci
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy; Operative Research Unit of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Letizia Caminiti
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy; Operative Research Unit of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Stefani
- Department of System Medicine, Unità Operativa Semplice Dipartimentale Parkinson, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Viselli
- Department of Neurology, St John the Baptist Hospital, Associazione dei Cavalieri Italiani del Sovrano Militare Ordine di Malta (ACISMOM), Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rocco Cerroni
- Department of System Medicine, Unità Operativa Semplice Dipartimentale Parkinson, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabresi
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Bentivoglio
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Tufo
- Neurosurgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Neurosurgery Department, Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai Silicon Oasis, Dubai
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy; Operative Research Unit of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Richardson K, Wessells R. A novel panel of Drosophila TAFAZZIN mutants in distinct genetic backgrounds as a resource for therapeutic testing. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286380. [PMID: 37756350 PMCID: PMC10529581 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Barth Syndrome is a rare, X-linked disorder caused by mutation of the gene TAFAZZIN (TAZ). The corresponding Tafazzin protein is involved in the remodeling of cardiolipin, a phospholipid with critical roles in mitochondrial function. While recent clinical trials have been promising, there is still no cure for Barth Syndrome. Because TAZ is highly conserved, multiple animal and cell culture models exist for pre-clinical testing of therapeutics. However, since the same mutation in different patients can lead to different symptoms and responses to treatment, isogenized experimental models can't fully account for human disease conditions. On the other hand, isogenized animal models allow for sufficient numbers to thoroughly establish efficacy for a given genetic background. Therefore, a combined method for testing treatments in a panel of isogenized cohorts that are genetically distinct from each other would be transformative for testing emerging pre-clinical therapies. To aid in this effort, we've created a novel panel of 10 Drosophila lines, each with the same TAZ mutation in highly diverse genetic backgrounds, to serve as a helpful resource to represent natural variation in background genetics in pre-clinical studies. As a proof of principle, we test our panel here using nicotinamide riboside (NR), a treatment with established therapeutic value, to evaluate how robust this therapy is across the 10 genetic backgrounds in this novel reference panel. We find substantial variation in the response to NR across backgrounds. We expect this resource will be valuable in pre-clinical testing of emerging therapies for Barth Syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Richardson
- Department of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Robert Wessells
- Department of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Statz M, Schleuter F, Weber H, Kober M, Plocksties F, Timmermann D, Storch A, Fauser M. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation does not alter growth factor expression in a rat model of stable dopaminergic deficiency. Neurosci Lett 2023; 814:137459. [PMID: 37625613 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been a highly effective treatment option for mid-to-late-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) for decades. Besides direct effects on brain networks, neuroprotective effects of STN-DBS - potentially via alterations of growth factor expression levels - have been proposed as additional mechanisms of action. OBJECTIVE In the context of clarifying DBS mechanisms, we analyzed brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) levels in the basal ganglia, motor and parietal cortices, and dentate gyrus in an animal model of stable, severe dopaminergic deficiency. METHODS We applied one week of continuous unilateral STN-DBS in a group of stable 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) hemiparkinsonian rats (6-OHDASTIM) in comparison to a 6-OHDA control group (6-OHDASHAM) as well as healthy controls (CTRLSTIM and CTRLSHAM). BDNF and GDNF levels were determined via ELISAs. RESULTS The 6-OHDA lesion did not result in a persistent alteration in either BDNF or GDNF levels in a model of severe dopaminergic deficiency after completion of the dopaminergic degeneration. STN-DBS modestly increased BDNF levels in the entopeduncular nucleus, but even impaired BDNF and GDNF expression in cortical areas. CONCLUSIONS STN-DBS does not increase growth factor expression when applied to a model of completed, severe dopaminergic deficiency in contrast to other studies in models of modest and ongoing dopaminergic degeneration. In healthy controls, STN-DBS does not influence BDNF or GDNF expression. We consider these findings relevant for clinical purposes since DBS in PD is usually applied late in the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meike Statz
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Frederike Schleuter
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Hanna Weber
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Maria Kober
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Franz Plocksties
- Institute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 26, 18119 Rostock, Germany
| | - Dirk Timmermann
- Institute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 26, 18119 Rostock, Germany
| | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany; German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Mareike Fauser
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cavallieri F, Campanini I, Gessani A, Budriesi C, Fioravanti V, Di Rauso G, Feletti A, Damiano B, Scaltriti S, Guagnano N, Bardi E, Corni MG, Rossi J, Antonelli F, Cavalleri F, Molinari MA, Contardi S, Menozzi E, Puzzolante A, Vannozzi G, Bergamini E, Pavesi G, Meoni S, Fraix V, Fraternali A, Versari A, Lusuardi M, Biagini G, Merlo A, Moro E, Valzania F. Long-term effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on gait disorders in Parkinson's disease: a clinical-instrumental study. J Neurol 2023; 270:4342-4353. [PMID: 37208527 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11780-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the long-term effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on gait in a cohort of advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients. METHODS This observational study included consecutive PD patients treated with bilateral STN-DBS. Different stimulation and drug treatment conditions were assessed: on-stimulation/off-medication, off-stimulation/off-medication, and on-stimulation/on-medication. Each patient performed the instrumented Timed Up and Go test (iTUG). The instrumental evaluation of walking ability was carried out with a wearable inertial sensor containing a three-dimensional (3D) accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer. This device could provide 3D linear acceleration, angular velocity, and magnetic field vector. Disease motor severity was evaluated with the total score and subscores of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale part III. RESULTS Twenty-five PD patients with a 5-years median follow-up after surgery (range 3-7) were included (18 men; mean disease duration at surgery 10.44 ± 4.62 years; mean age at surgery 58.40 ± 5.73 years). Both stimulation and medication reduced the total duration of the iTUG and most of its different phases, suggesting a long-term beneficial effect on gait after surgery. However, comparing the two treatments, dopaminergic therapy had a more marked effect in all test phases. STN-DBS alone reduced total iTUG duration, sit-to-stand, and second turn phases duration, while it had a lower effect on stand-to-sit, first turn, forward walking, and walking backward phases duration. CONCLUSIONS This study highlighted that in the long-term after surgery, STN-DBS may contribute to gait and postural control improvement when used together with dopamine replacement therapy, which still shows a substantial beneficial effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cavallieri
- Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Neurology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Isabella Campanini
- LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, S. Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio, Italy.
| | - Annalisa Gessani
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Agostino Estense Hospital, AziendaOspedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Carla Budriesi
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Agostino Estense Hospital, AziendaOspedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Valentina Fioravanti
- Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Neurology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giulia Di Rauso
- Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Neurology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Agostino Estense Hospital, AziendaOspedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Alberto Feletti
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Institute of Neurosurgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Neurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Benedetta Damiano
- LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, S. Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio, Italy
| | - Sara Scaltriti
- LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, S. Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio, Italy
| | - Noemi Guagnano
- LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, S. Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio, Italy
| | - Elisa Bardi
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Agostino Estense Hospital, AziendaOspedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Corni
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Agostino Estense Hospital, AziendaOspedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Jessica Rossi
- Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Neurology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesca Antonelli
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Agostino Estense Hospital, AziendaOspedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesca Cavalleri
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Neuroscience, Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, Modena, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Molinari
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Agostino Estense Hospital, AziendaOspedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Sara Contardi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Neurologia e Rete Stroke Metropolitana, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elisa Menozzi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Annette Puzzolante
- Neurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vannozzi
- Laboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Bergamini
- Laboratory of Bioengineering and Neuromechanics, Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pavesi
- Neurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Modena, Ospedale Civile Baggiovara (OCB) Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Sara Meoni
- Division of Neurology, Grenoble Alpes University, Centre HospitalierUniversitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble, France
| | - Valérie Fraix
- Division of Neurology, Grenoble Alpes University, Centre HospitalierUniversitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Mirco Lusuardi
- Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42015, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Biagini
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Merlo
- LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, S. Sebastiano Hospital, Correggio, Italy
| | - Elena Moro
- Division of Neurology, Grenoble Alpes University, Centre HospitalierUniversitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble, France
| | - Franco Valzania
- Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Neurology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Helf C, Kober M, Markert F, Lanto J, Overhoff L, Badstübner-Meeske K, Storch A, Fauser M. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation induces nigrostriatal dopaminergic plasticity in a stable rat model of Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport 2023; 34:506-511. [PMID: 37270842 PMCID: PMC10234325 DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000001917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been a highly effective treatment option for middle to late stage Parkinson's disease for decades. Though, the underlying mechanisms of action, particularly effects on the cellular level, remain in part unclear. In the context of identifying disease-modifying effects of STN-DBS by prompting cellular plasticity in midbrain dopaminergic systems, we analyzed neuronal tyrosine hydroxylase and c-Fos expression in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA). METHODS We applied 1 week of continuous unilateral STN-DBS in a group of stable 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) hemiparkinsonian rats (STNSTIM) in comparison to a 6-OHDA control group (STNSHAM). Immunohistochemistry identified NeuN+, tyrosine hydroxylase+ and c-Fos+ cells within the SNpc and VTA. RESULTS After 1 week, rats in the STNSTIM group had 3.5-fold more tyrosine hydroxylase+ neurons within the SNpc (P = 0.010) but not in the VTA compared to sham controls. There was no difference in basal cell activity as indicated by c-Fos expression in both midbrain dopaminergic systems. CONCLUSION Our data support a neurorestorative effect of STN-DBS in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system already after 7 days of continuous STN-DBS in the stable Parkinson's disease rat model without affecting basal cell activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Kober
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Khatri DK, Preeti K, Tonape S, Bhattacharjee S, Patel M, Shah S, Singh PK, Srivastava S, Gugulothu D, Vora L, Singh SB. Nanotechnological Advances for Nose to Brain Delivery of Therapeutics to Improve the Parkinson Therapy. Curr Neuropharmacol 2023; 21:493-516. [PMID: 35524671 PMCID: PMC10207920 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x20666220507022701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) acts as a highly impermeable barrier, presenting an impediment to the crossing of most classical drugs targeted for neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson's disease (PD). About the nature of drugs and other potential molecules, they impose unavoidable doserestricted limitations eventually leading to the failure of therapy. However, many advancements in formulation technology and modification of delivery approaches have been successful in delivering the drug to the brain in the therapeutic window. The nose to the brain (N2B) drug delivery employing the nanoformulation, is one such emerging delivery approach, overcoming both classical drug formulation and delivery-associated limitations. This latter approach offers increased bioavailability, greater patient acceptance, lesser metabolic degradation of drugs, circumvention of BBB, ample drug loading along with the controlled release of the drugs. In N2B delivery, the intranasal (IN) route carries therapeutics firstly into the nasal cavity followed by the brain through olfactory and trigeminal nerve connections linked with nasal mucosa. The N2B delivery approach is being explored for delivering other biologicals like neuropeptides and mitochondria. Meanwhile, this N2B delivery system is associated with critical challenges consisting of mucociliary clearance, degradation by enzymes, and drug translocations by efflux mechanisms. These challenges finally culminated in the development of suitable surfacemodified nano-carriers and Focused- Ultrasound-Assisted IN as FUS-IN technique which has expanded the horizons of N2B drug delivery. Hence, nanotechnology, in collaboration with advances in the IN route of drug administration, has a diversified approach for treating PD. The present review discusses the physiology and limitation of IN delivery along with current advances in nanocarrier and technical development assisting N2B drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharmendra K. Khatri
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Kumari Preeti
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Shivraj Tonape
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Sheoshree Bhattacharjee
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Monica Patel
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Saurabh Shah
- Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Pankaj K. Singh
- Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Saurabh Srivastava
- Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| | - Dalapathi Gugulothu
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi-110017, India
| | - Lalitkumar Vora
- School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast-BT9 7BL, UK
| | - Shashi B. Singh
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana State, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jiang C, Wang J, Chen T, Li X, Cui Z. Short- and Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Deep-Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients aged 75 Years and Older. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12111588. [PMID: 36421912 PMCID: PMC9688478 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease aged 75 years and older. Methods: From March 2013 to June 2021, 27 patients with Parkinson’s disease (≥75 years old) who underwent DBS surgery at the First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital were selected. The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part 3 (UPDRS-III), 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), and Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living (BI) scores were used to evaluate motor function and quality of life before surgery and during on and off periods of DBS at 1 year post operation and at the final follow-up. A series of non-motor scales were used to evaluate sleep, cognition, and mood, and the levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was also assessed. Adverse events related to surgery were noted. Results: The average follow-up time was 55.08 (21−108) months. Symptoms were significantly improved at 1 year post operation. The median UPDRS-III score decreased from 35 points (baseline) to 19 points (improvement of 45.7%) in the stimulation-on period at 1 year post operation (t = 19.230, p < 0.001) and to 32 points (improvement of 8.6%) at the final follow-up (t = 3.456, p = 0.002). In the stimulation-off period, the median score of UPDRS-III increased from 35 points to 39 points (deterioration of −11.4%) at 1 year post operation (Z = −4.030, p < 0.001) and 45 points (deterioration of −28.6%) at the final follow-up (Z = −4.207, p < 0.001). The PDQ-39 overall scores decreased from 88 points (baseline) to 55 points (improvement of 37.5%) in the stimulation-on period at 1 year post operation (t = 11.390, p < 0.001) and 81 points (improvement of 8.0%) at the final follow-up (t = 2.142, p = 0.044). In the stimulation-off period, the median PDQ-39 score increased from 88 points to 99 points (deterioration of −12.5%) at the final follow-up (Z = −2.801, p = 0.005). The ADL-Barthel Index score increased from 25 points (baseline) to 75 points (improvement of 66.7%) at 1 year post operation (Z = −4.205, p < 0.001) and to 35 points (improvement of 28.6%) at the final follow-up (Z = −4.034, p < 0.001). In the stimulation-off period, BI scores decreased from 25 points to 15 points (deterioration of −40%) at 1 year post operation (Z = −3.225, p = 0.01) and to 15 points (deterioration of −40%) at the final follow-up (Z = −3.959, p = 0.001). Sleep, cognition, and mood were slightly improved at 1 year post operation (p < 0.05), and LEDD was reduced from 650 mg (baseline) to 280 mg and 325 mg at 1 year post operation and the final follow-up, respectively (p < 0.05). One patient had a cortical hemorrhage in the puncture tract on day 2 after surgery, five patients had hallucinations in the acute stage after surgery, and one patient had an exposed left-brain electrode lead at 4 months post operation; there were no infections or death. Conclusion: DBS showed efficacy and safety in treating older patients (≥75 years old) with Parkinson’s disease. Motor function, quality of life, activities of daily living, LEDD, and sleep all showed long-term improvements with DBS; short-term improvements in emotional and cognitive function were also noted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Jiang
- Institute of Neuroscience, College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Tong Chen
- Department of Neurology, The Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xuemei Li
- Cadre Medical Department, The First Medical Clinical Center, PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Zhiqiang Cui
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bove F, Genovese D, Moro E. Developments in the mechanistic understanding and clinical application of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Expert Rev Neurother 2022; 22:789-803. [PMID: 36228575 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2136030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a life-changing treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and gives the unique opportunity to directly explore how basal ganglia work. Despite the rapid technological innovation of the last years, the untapped potential of DBS is still high. AREAS COVERED. This review summarizes the developments in the mechanistic understanding of DBS and the potential clinical applications of cutting-edge technological advances. Rather than a univocal local mechanism, DBS exerts its therapeutic effects through several multimodal mechanisms and involving both local and network-wide structures, although crucial questions remain unexplained. Nonetheless, new insights in mechanistic understanding of DBS in PD have provided solid bases for advances in preoperative selection phase, prediction of motor and non-motor outcomes, leads placement and postoperative stimulation programming. EXPERT OPINION. DBS has not only strong evidence of clinical effectiveness in PD treatment, but technological advancements are revamping its role of neuromodulation of brain circuits and key to better understanding PD pathophysiology. In the next few years, the worldwide use of new technologies in clinical practice will provide large data to elucidate their role and to expand their applications for PD patients, providing useful insights to personalize DBS treatment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Bove
- Neurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Genovese
- Fresco Institute for Parkinson's and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, CHU of Grenoble, Division of Neurology, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, INSERM, U1216, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Treated with Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: A Long-Term Overview. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10092214. [PMID: 36140318 PMCID: PMC9496255 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment in advanced Parkinson’s Disease (PD). However, the effects of STN-DBS on freezing of gait (FOG) are still debated, particularly in the long-term follow-up (≥5-years). The main aim of the current study is to evaluate the long-term effects of STN-DBS on FOG. Twenty STN-DBS treated PD patients were included. Each patient was assessed before surgery through a detailed neurological evaluation, including FOG score, and revaluated in the long-term (median follow-up: 5-years) in different stimulation and drug conditions. In the long term follow-up, FOG score significantly worsened in the off-stimulation/off-medication condition compared with the pre-operative off-medication assessment (z = −1.930; p = 0.05) but not in the on-stimulation/off-medication (z = −0.357; p = 0.721). There was also a significant improvement of FOG at long-term assessment by comparing on-stimulation/off-medication and off-stimulation/off-medication conditions (z = −2.944; p = 0.003). These results highlight the possible beneficial long-term effects of STN-DBS on FOG.
Collapse
|
24
|
Koivu M, Scheperjans F, Eerola-Rautio J, Vartiainen N, Resendiz-Nieves J, Kivisaari R, Pekkonen E. Real-Life Experience on Directional Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Advanced Parkinson’s Disease. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081224. [PMID: 36013173 PMCID: PMC9410362 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Directional deep brain stimulation (dDBS) is preferred by patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) and by programming neurologists. However, real-life data of dDBS use is still scarce. We reviewed the clinical data of 53 PD patients with dDBS to 18 months of follow-up. Directional stimulation was favored in 70.5% of dDBS leads, and single segment activation (SSA) was used in 60% of dDBS leads. Current with SSA was significantly lower than with other stimulation types. During the 6-month follow-up, a 44% improvement in the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) points and a 43% decline in the levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD) was observed. After 18 months of follow-up, a 35% LEDD decrease was still noted. The Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stages and scores on item no 30 “postural stability” in UPDRS-III remained lower throughout the follow-up compared to baseline. Additionally, dDBS relieved non-motor symptoms during the 6 months of follow-up. Patients with bilateral SSA had similar clinical outcomes to those with other stimulation types. Directional stimulation appears to effectively reduce both motor and non-motor symptoms in advanced PD with minimal adverse effects in real-life clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maija Koivu
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, PL 00029 Helsinki, Finland; (F.S.); (J.E.-R.); (E.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Filip Scheperjans
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, PL 00029 Helsinki, Finland; (F.S.); (J.E.-R.); (E.P.)
| | - Johanna Eerola-Rautio
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, PL 00029 Helsinki, Finland; (F.S.); (J.E.-R.); (E.P.)
| | - Nuutti Vartiainen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, PL 00029 Helsinki, Finland; (N.V.); (J.R.-N.); (R.K.)
| | - Julio Resendiz-Nieves
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, PL 00029 Helsinki, Finland; (N.V.); (J.R.-N.); (R.K.)
| | - Riku Kivisaari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, PL 00029 Helsinki, Finland; (N.V.); (J.R.-N.); (R.K.)
| | - Eero Pekkonen
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, PL 00029 Helsinki, Finland; (F.S.); (J.E.-R.); (E.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Silverio AA, Silverio LAA. Developments in Deep Brain Stimulators for Successful Aging Towards Smart Devices—An Overview. FRONTIERS IN AGING 2022; 3:848219. [PMID: 35821845 PMCID: PMC9261350 DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2022.848219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
This work provides an overview of the present state-of-the-art in the development of deep brain Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and how such devices alleviate motor and cognitive disorders for a successful aging. This work reviews chronic diseases that are addressable via DBS, reporting also the treatment efficacies. The underlying mechanism for DBS is also reported. A discussion on hardware developments focusing on DBS control paradigms is included specifically the open- and closed-loop “smart” control implementations. Furthermore, developments towards a “smart” DBS, while considering the design challenges, current state of the art, and constraints, are also presented. This work also showcased different methods, using ambient energy scavenging, that offer alternative solutions to prolong the battery life of the DBS device. These are geared towards a low maintenance, semi-autonomous, and less disruptive device to be used by the elderly patient suffering from motor and cognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelito A. Silverio
- Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
- Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
- *Correspondence: Angelito A. Silverio,
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gülke E, Alsalem M, Kirsten M, Vettorazzi E, Choe CU, Hidding U, Zittel-Dirks S, Buhmann C, Schaper M, Gulberti A, Moll CKE, Hamel W, Koeppen J, Gerloff C, Pötter-Nerger M. Comparison of Montreal cognitive assessment and Mattis dementia rating scale in the preoperative evaluation of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265314. [PMID: 35390029 PMCID: PMC8989318 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
The preoperative evaluation of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients for subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) includes the assessment of the neuropsychological status of the patient. A widely used preoperative test is the Mattis Dementia rating scale (MDRS). However, the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) has also been proven to be a sensitive, time-sparing tool with high diagnostic validity in PD. We evaluate the utility of the MoCA as a preoperative screening test for PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS.
Methods
In this single-centre, retrospective study, we analysed pre- and postoperative assessments of MoCA, MDRS, Movement disorder society-Unified PD Rating Scale-motor examination, PD Questionnaire-39 and levodopa equivalent daily dose. Longitudinal outcome changes were analysed using paired t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, linear regression and CHAID (chi-square automatic interaction detector) regression tree model.
Results
Clinical motor and cognitive scores of 59 patients (61.05±7.73 years, 24 females) were analysed. The MoCA, but not the MDRS, identified significant postoperative cognitive decline in PD patients undergoing STN-DBS. The preoperative MoCA score correlated with postoperative quality of life improvement, whereas the MDRS did not. PD patients with a MoCA score ≤ 23 points had a significant decline of quality of life after DBS surgery compared to patients > 23 points.
Conclusion
This study identifies the MoCA as an alternative test within the preoperative evaluation of PD patients for the detection of neuropsychological deficits and prediction of the postoperative improvement of quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen Gülke
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Alsalem
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maja Kirsten
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eik Vettorazzi
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chi-un Choe
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute Hidding
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Zittel-Dirks
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Buhmann
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Miriam Schaper
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Gulberti
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian K. E. Moll
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hamel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Koeppen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gerloff
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lima AA, Mridha MF, Das SC, Kabir MM, Islam MR, Watanobe Y. A Comprehensive Survey on the Detection, Classification, and Challenges of Neurological Disorders. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:469. [PMID: 35336842 PMCID: PMC8945195 DOI: 10.3390/biology11030469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Neurological disorders (NDs) are becoming more common, posing a concern to pregnant women, parents, healthy infants, and children. Neurological disorders arise in a wide variety of forms, each with its own set of origins, complications, and results. In recent years, the intricacy of brain functionalities has received a better understanding due to neuroimaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and positron emission tomography (PET), etc. With high-performance computational tools and various machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods, these modalities have discovered exciting possibilities for identifying and diagnosing neurological disorders. This study follows a computer-aided diagnosis methodology, leading to an overview of pre-processing and feature extraction techniques. The performance of existing ML and DL approaches for detecting NDs is critically reviewed and compared in this article. A comprehensive portion of this study also shows various modalities and disease-specified datasets that detect and records images, signals, and speeches, etc. Limited related works are also summarized on NDs, as this domain has significantly fewer works focused on disease and detection criteria. Some of the standard evaluation metrics are also presented in this study for better result analysis and comparison. This research has also been outlined in a consistent workflow. At the conclusion, a mandatory discussion section has been included to elaborate on open research challenges and directions for future work in this emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aklima Akter Lima
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh; (A.A.L.); (M.F.M.); (S.C.D.); (M.M.K.)
| | - M. Firoz Mridha
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh; (A.A.L.); (M.F.M.); (S.C.D.); (M.M.K.)
| | - Sujoy Chandra Das
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh; (A.A.L.); (M.F.M.); (S.C.D.); (M.M.K.)
| | - Muhammad Mohsin Kabir
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh; (A.A.L.); (M.F.M.); (S.C.D.); (M.M.K.)
| | - Md. Rashedul Islam
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Asia Pacific, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
| | - Yutaka Watanobe
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Aizu, Aizu-Wakamatsu 965-8580, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
de Lucca MET, Maffini JF, Grassi MG, Abdala AE, Nisihara RM, Francisco AN, Farah M, Kumer TVHFDO. Quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease: a comparison between preoperative and postoperative states among those who were treated with deep brain stimulation. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 80:391-398. [PMID: 35293555 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2021-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established procedure for treating Parkinson's disease (PD). Although its mechanisms of action are still unclear, improvements in motor symptoms and reductions in medication side effects can be achieved for a significant proportion of patients, with consequent enhancement of quality of life. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of DBS on the quality of life of PD patients. METHODS This was a retrospective longitudinal study with collection of historical data in a neurosurgery center, from June 2019 to December 2020. The sample was obtained according to convenience, and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III and IV, Trail-Making Test and Verbal Fluency Test were used. RESULTS Data were collected from 17 patients (13 with subthalamic nucleus DBS and 4 with globus pallidus pars interna DBS). Significant improvement (p=0.008) on the UPDRS III was observed in comparing the preoperative without DBS with the postoperative with DBS. About 47.0% of the patients showed post-surgical improvement in QoL (p=0.29). Thirteen patients were able to complete part A of the Trail-Making Test and four of these also completed part B. Almost 60% of the patients scored sufficiently on the semantic test, whereas only 11.8% scored sufficiently on the orthographic evaluation. No association between implant site and test performance could be traced. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in quality of life and motor function were observed in the majority of the patients enrolled. Despite the limitations of this study, DBS strongly benefits a significant proportion of PD patients when well indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marina Farah
- Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Koirala N, Bange M, Glaser M, Pintea B, Dresel C, Deuschl G, Muthuraman M, Groppa S. Deciphering the Network Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease. Neurol Ther 2022; 11:265-282. [PMID: 35000133 PMCID: PMC8857357 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-021-00318-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, a more detailed characterization of the targeted network and its grey matter (GM) terminals that drive the clinical outcome is needed. In this direction, the use of MRI after DBS surgery is now possible due to recent advances in hardware, opening a window for the clarification of the association between the affected tissue, including white matter fiber pathways and modulated GM regions, and the DBS-related clinical outcome. Therefore, we present a computational framework for reconstruction of targeted networks on postoperative MRI. METHODS We used a combination of preoperative whole-brain T1-weighted (T1w) and diffusion-weighted MRI data for morphometric integrity assessment and postoperative T1w MRI for electrode reconstruction and network reconstruction in 15 idiopathic PD patients. Within this framework, we made use of DBS lead artifact intensity profiles on postoperative MRI to determine DBS locations used as seeds for probabilistic tractography to cortical and subcortical targets within the motor circuitry. Lastly, we evaluated the relationship between brain microstructural characteristics of DBS-targeted brain network terminals and postoperative clinical outcomes. RESULTS The proposed framework showed robust performance for identifying the DBS electrode positions. Connectivity profiles between the primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), and DBS locations were strongly associated with the stimulation intensity needed for the optimal clinical outcome. Local diffusion properties of the modulated pathways were related to DBS outcomes. STN-DBS motor symptom improvement was highly associated with cortical thickness in the middle frontal and superior frontal cortices, but not with subcortical volumetry. CONCLUSION These data suggest that STN-DBS outcomes largely rely on the modulatory interference from cortical areas, particularly M1 and SMA, to DBS locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Nabin Koirala
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuel Bange
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Martin Glaser
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bogdan Pintea
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle de la Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christian Dresel
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital UKSH, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jergas H, Grindegård L, Schultze T, Thanarajah SE, Kalbe E, van Eimeren T, Dafsari HS, Dembek TA, Visser-Vandewalle V, Fink GR, Timmermann L, Schilbach L, Barbe MT. The impact of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on belief revision and social validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2021; 89:84-86. [PMID: 34256332 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
We investigated whether Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) influences social validation as measured by a Judge-Advisor task. In contrast to healthy controls and patients with their DBS OFF, patients with their stimulation switched on do not experience a gain of confidence after receiving competent advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Jergas
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Linnéa Grindegård
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Schultze
- Institute of Psychology, Georg-August University, Gosslerstraße 14, 37073, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah
- Department of Neurology, Faculaty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elke Kalbe
- Department of Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thilo van Eimeren
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Haidar S Dafsari
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg, Marburg Campus, Baldingerstraße, 35033, Marburg, Germany
| | - Leonhard Schilbach
- Independent Max Planck Research Group for Social Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Kraepelin str. 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael T Barbe
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fauser M, Ricken M, Markert F, Weis N, Schmitt O, Gimsa J, Winter C, Badstübner-Meeske K, Storch A. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation induces sustained neurorestoration in the mesolimbic dopaminergic system in a Parkinson's disease model. Neurobiol Dis 2021; 156:105404. [PMID: 34044146 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established therapeutic principle in Parkinson's disease, but the underlying mechanisms, particularly mediating non-motor actions, remain largely enigmatic. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS The delayed onset of neuropsychiatric actions in conjunction with first experimental evidence that STN-DBS causes disease-modifying effects prompted our investigation on how cellular plasticity in midbrain dopaminergic systems is affected by STN-DBS. METHODS We applied unilateral or bilateral STN-DBS in two independent cohorts of 6-hydroxydopamine hemiparkinsonian rats four to eight weeks after dopaminergic lesioning to allow for the development of a stable dopaminergic dysfunction prior to DBS electrode implantation. RESULTS After 5 weeks of STN-DBS, stimulated animals had significantly more TH+ dopaminergic neurons and fibres in both the nigrostriatal and the mesolimbic systems compared to sham controls with large effect sizes of gHedges = 1.9-3.4. DBS of the entopeduncular nucleus as the homologue of the human Globus pallidus internus did not alter the dopaminergic systems. STN-DBS effects on mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons were largely confirmed in an independent animal cohort with unilateral STN stimulation for 6 weeks or for 3 weeks followed by a 3 weeks washout period. The latter subgroup even demonstrated persistent mesolimbic dopaminergic plasticity after washout. Pilot behavioural testing showed that augmentative dopaminergic effects on the mesolimbic system by STN-DBS might translate into improvement of sensorimotor neglect. CONCLUSIONS Our data support sustained neurorestorative effects of STN-DBS not only in the nigrostriatal but also in the mesolimbic system as a potential factor mediating long-latency neuropsychiatric effects of STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike Fauser
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Manuel Ricken
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Franz Markert
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Nikolai Weis
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver Schmitt
- Department of Anatomy, University of Rostock, Gertrudenstraße 9, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Jan Gimsa
- Department of Biophysics, University of Rostock, Gertrudenstraße 11A, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Christine Winter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany; German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Azevedo P, Aquino CC, Fasano A. Surgical Management of Parkinson's Disease in the Elderly. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:500-509. [PMID: 33981782 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly popular therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD). Despite the experience gained over time with DBS of either the subthalamus or the globus pallidus pars interna, there is still no consensus regarding the age limit for DBS indication. Objectives This narrative review of the literature discusses the issues of age and DBS, emphasizing the critical need for good quality evidence to support the surgical management of elderly patients with PD. Methods We searched PubMed using the terms Parkinson's Disease; Parkinson's Disease therapy; deep brain stimulation; antiparkinsonian agents therapeutic use; age factors; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; treatment outcome; and risk assessments. Results We identified several limitations of the available evidence, such as under-representation of older patients in DBS studies, small sample sizes in studies with older participants, heterogeneity of outcomes, and conflicting results. Conclusions Despite preliminary suggestions that age might affect the outcomes of DBS, the evidence to support the hypothesis of age as an independent predictor of DBS outcomes is limited and results are controversial. Ultimately, finding an age-independent biomarker predicting DBS outcome is the final goal to expand this powerful treatment to all patients age in an effective and safe manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Azevedo
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Division of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Camila C Aquino
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Division of Neurology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute Toronto Ontario Canada.,CenteR for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA) Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cavallieri F, Fraix V, Bove F, Mulas D, Tondelli M, Castrioto A, Krack P, Meoni S, Schmitt E, Lhommée E, Bichon A, Pélissier P, Chevrier E, Kistner A, Seigneuret E, Chabardès S, Moro E. Predictors of Long-Term Outcome of Subthalamic Stimulation in Parkinson Disease. Ann Neurol 2021; 89:587-597. [PMID: 33349939 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to identify preoperative predictive factors of long-term motor outcome in a large cohort of consecutive Parkinson disease (PD) patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). METHODS All consecutive PD patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS at the Grenoble University Hospital (France) from 1993 to 2015 were evaluated before surgery, at 1 year (short-term), and in the long term after surgery. All available demographic variables, neuroimaging data, and clinical characteristics were collected. Preoperative predictors of long-term motor outcome were investigated by performing survival and univariate/multivariate Cox regression analyses. Loss of motor benefit from stimulation in the long term was defined as a reduction of less than 25% in the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III scores compared to the baseline off-medication scores. As a secondary objective, potential predictors of short-term motor outcome after STN-DBS were assessed by performing univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS In the long-term analyses (mean follow-up = 8.4 ± 6.26 years, median = 10 years, range = 1-17 years), 138 patients were included. Preoperative higher frontal score and off-medication MDS-UPDRS part III scores predicted a better long-term motor response to stimulation, whereas the presence of vascular changes on neuroimaging predicted a worse motor outcome. In 357 patients with available 1-year follow-up, preoperative levodopa response, tremor dominant phenotype, baseline frontal score, and off-medication MDS-UPDRS part III scores predicted the short-term motor outcome. INTERPRETATION Frontal lobe dysfunction, disease severity in the off-medication condition, and the presence of vascular changes on neuroimaging represent the main preoperative clinical predictors of long-term motor STN-DBS effects. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:587-597.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cavallieri
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Valérie Fraix
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, UGA INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Francesco Bove
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Delia Mulas
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.,Neurology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Manuela Tondelli
- Neurology Unit, University Hospital Policlinico, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Science, Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna Castrioto
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, UGA INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Paul Krack
- Department of Neurology, Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sara Meoni
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, UGA INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Emmanuelle Schmitt
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Eugénie Lhommée
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Amélie Bichon
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Pierre Pélissier
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Eric Chevrier
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Andrea Kistner
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, UGA INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France
| | - Eric Seigneuret
- Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, UGA INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France.,Division of Neurosurgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital Center, Grenoble, France
| | - Stephan Chabardès
- Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, UGA INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France.,Division of Neurosurgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital Center, Grenoble, France
| | - Elena Moro
- Movement Disorders Unit, University Hospital Center, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, UGA INSERM U1216, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rissanen SM, Koivu M, Hartikainen P, Pekkonen E. Ambulatory surface electromyography with accelerometry for evaluating daily motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 132:469-479. [PMID: 33450567 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate motor fluctuations in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) using a small-sized wearable device for surface electromyography (EMG) with accelerometry (ACC) for 24 hours. METHODS Seven PD patients with medication were measured once, and nine patients with directional deep brain stimulation (dDBS) twice: before and after the dDBS reprogramming. EMG and ACC parameters were compared with clinical rating scores and patients' home diaries. RESULTS The combination of EMG and ACC parameters (first principal component PC1) correlated significantly with patient's condition as quantified by the motor score of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and it changed significantly with dDBS reprogramming in line with decreased PD symptoms. Monitoring data detected in comparison with the home diaries: 91 % concordance with tremor, 76 % with rigidity, and 74 % with dyskinesia. In the DBS group, the wake-up time with abnormal neuromuscular function was reduced with reprogramming in all except one patient based on measurements. CONCLUSIONS A wearable device measuring simultaneously both muscle activity and motion can provide continuous and dynamic information about patient's condition and motor fluctuations at home. SIGNIFICANCE The present method may help to modify pharmacologic management and DBS treatment in advanced PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saara M Rissanen
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Maija Koivu
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Päivi Hartikainen
- Neurology Outpatient Clinic, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eero Pekkonen
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tanskanen JM, Ahtiainen A, Hyttinen JA. Toward Closed-Loop Electrical Stimulation of Neuronal Systems: A Review. Bioelectricity 2020; 2:328-347. [PMID: 34471853 PMCID: PMC8370352 DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2020.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Biological neuronal cells communicate using neurochemistry and electrical signals. The same phenomena also allow us to probe and manipulate neuronal systems and communicate with them. Neuronal system malfunctions cause a multitude of symptoms and functional deficiencies that can be assessed and sometimes alleviated by electrical stimulation. Our working hypothesis is that real-time closed-loop full-duplex measurement and stimulation paradigms can provide more in-depth insight into neuronal networks and enhance our capability to control diseases of the nervous system. In this study, we review extracellular electrical stimulation methods used in in vivo, in vitro, and in silico neuroscience research and in the clinic (excluding methods mainly aimed at neuronal growth and other similar effects) and highlight the potential of closed-loop measurement and stimulation systems. A multitude of electrical stimulation and measurement-based methods are widely used in research and the clinic. Closed-loop methods have been proposed, and some are used in the clinic. However, closed-loop systems utilizing more complex measurement analysis and adaptive stimulation systems, such as artificial intelligence systems connected to biological neuronal systems, do not yet exist. Our review promotes the research and development of intelligent paradigms aimed at meaningful communications between neuronal and information and communications technology systems, "dialogical paradigms," which have the potential to take neuroscience and clinical methods to a new level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarno M.A. Tanskanen
- BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Annika Ahtiainen
- BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jari A.K. Hyttinen
- BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Krahulík D, Nevrlý M, Otruba P, Bardoň J, Hrabálek L, Pohlodek D, Kaňovský P, Valošek J. O-Arm Navigated Frameless and Fiducial-Less Deep Brain Stimulation. Brain Sci 2020; 10:brainsci10100683. [PMID: 32992610 PMCID: PMC7600133 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10100683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Object: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a very useful procedure for the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD), essential tremor, and dystonia. The authors evaluated the accuracy of the new method used in their center for the placing of DBS electrodes. Electrodes are placed using the intraoperative O-arm™ (Medtronic)-controlled frameless and fiducial-less system, Nexframe™ (Medtronic). Accuracy was evaluated prospectively in eleven consecutive PD patients (22 electrodes). Methods: Eleven adult patients with PD were implanted using the Nexframe system without fiducials and with the intraoperative O-arm (Medtronic) system and StealthStation™ S8 navigation (Medtronic). The implantation of DBS leads was performed using multiple-cell microelectrode recording, and intraoperative test stimulation to determine thresholds for stimulation-induced adverse effects. The accuracy was checked in three different steps: (1) using the intraoperative O-arm image and its fusion with preoperative planning, (2) using multiple-cell microelectrode recording and counting the number of microelectrodes with the signal of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and finally, (3) total error was calculated according to a postoperative CT control image fused to preoperative planning. Results: The total error of the procedure was 1.79 mm; the radial error and the vector error were 171 mm and 163 mm. Conclusions: Implantation of DBS electrodes using an O-arm navigated frameless and fiducial-less system is a very useful and technically feasible procedure with excellent patient toleration with experienced Nexframe users. The accuracy of the method was confirmed at all three steps, and it is comparable to other published results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krahulík
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (L.H.); (D.P.); (J.V.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Martin Nevrlý
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (M.N.); (P.O.); (J.B.); (P.K.)
| | - Pavel Otruba
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (M.N.); (P.O.); (J.B.); (P.K.)
| | - Jan Bardoň
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (M.N.); (P.O.); (J.B.); (P.K.)
| | - Lumír Hrabálek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (L.H.); (D.P.); (J.V.)
| | - Daniel Pohlodek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (L.H.); (D.P.); (J.V.)
| | - Petr Kaňovský
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (M.N.); (P.O.); (J.B.); (P.K.)
| | - Jan Valošek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (L.H.); (D.P.); (J.V.)
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (M.N.); (P.O.); (J.B.); (P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Navratilova D, Krobot A, Otruba P, Nevrly M, Krahulik D, Kolar P, Kolarova B, Kaiserova M, Mensikova K, Vastik M, Kurcova S, Kanovsky P. Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Gait Pattern in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:814. [PMID: 32922256 PMCID: PMC7456806 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gait disturbance accompanies many neurodegenerative diseases; it is characteristic for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Treatment of advanced PD often includes deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus. Regarding gait, previous studies have reported non-significant or conflicting results, possibly related to methodological limitations. Objective The objective of this prospective study was to assess the effects of DBS on biomechanical parameters of gait in patients with PD. Methods Twenty-one patients with advanced PD participated in this prospective study. Gait was examined in all patients using the Zebris FDM-T pressure-sensitive treadmill (Isny, Germany) before DBS implantation and after surgery immediately, further immediately after the start of neurostimulation, and 3 months after neurostimulator activation. We assessed spontaneous gait on a moving treadmill at different speeds. Step length, stance phase of both lower limbs, double-stance phase, and cadence were evaluated. Results In this study, step length increased, allowing the cadence to decrease. Double-stance phase duration, that is, the most sensitive parameter of gait quality and unsteadiness, was reduced, in gait at a speed of 4.5 km/h and in the narrow-based gaits at 1 km/h (tandem gait), which demonstrates improvement. Conclusion This study suggests positive effects of DBS treatment on gait in PD patients. Improvement was observed in several biomechanical parameters of gait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Navratilova
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Alois Krobot
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Pavel Otruba
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Martin Nevrly
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - David Krahulik
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Petr Kolar
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Barbora Kolarova
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Michaela Kaiserova
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Katerina Mensikova
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Miroslav Vastik
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Sandra Kurcova
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| | - Petr Kanovsky
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Piano C, Bove F, Mulas D, Bentivoglio AR, Cioni B, Tufo T. Frameless stereotaxy in subthalamic deep brain stimulation: 3-year clinical outcome. Neurol Sci 2020; 42:259-266. [PMID: 32638134 PMCID: PMC7819924 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04561-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background In most centers, the surgery of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is performed using a stereotactic frame. Compared with frame-based technique, frameless stereotaxy reduces the duration of surgical procedure and patient’s discomfort, with lead placing accuracy equivalent after the learning curve. Although several studies have investigated the targeting accuracy of this technique, only a few studies reported clinical outcomes, with data of short-term follow-up. Objective To assess clinical efficacy and safety of frameless bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients at 1- and 3-year follow-up. Methods Consecutive PD patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS with a manual adjustable frameless system were included in the study. The data were collected retrospectively. Results Eighteen PD patients underwent bilateral STN-DBS implant and were included in the study. All patients completed 1-year observation and ten of them completed 3-year observation. At 1-year follow-up, motor efficacy of STN stimulation in off-med condition was of 30.1% (P = 0.003) and at 3-year follow-up was of 36.3%, compared with off-stim condition at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.005). Dopaminergic drugs were significantly reduced by 31.2% 1 year after the intervention (P = 0.003) and 31.7% 3 years after the intervention (P = 0.04). No serious adverse events occurred during surgery. Conclusions Frameless stereotaxy is an effective and safe technique for DBS surgery at 1- and 3-year follow-up, with great advantages for patients’ discomfort during surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Piano
- Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Bove
- Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Delia Mulas
- Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Neurology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Bentivoglio
- Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Cioni
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Tufo
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Villalobos J, McDermott HJ, McNeill P, Golod A, Rathi V, Bauquier SH, Fallon JB. Slim electrodes for improved targeting in deep brain stimulation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:026008. [PMID: 32101807 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab7a51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The efficacy of deep brain stimulation can be limited by factors including poor selectivity of stimulation, targeting error, and complications related to implant reliability and stability. We aimed to improve surgical outcomes by evaluating electrode leads with smaller diameter electrode and microelectrodes incorporated which can be used for assisting targeting. APPROACH Electrode arrays were constructed with two different diameters of 0.65 mm and the standard 1.3 mm. Micro-electrodes were incorporated into the slim electrode arrays for recording spiking neural activity. Arrays were bilaterally implanted into the medial geniculate body (MGB) in nine anaesthetised cats for 24-40 h using stereotactic techniques. Recordings of auditory evoked field potentials and multi-unit activity were obtained at 1 mm intervals along the electrode insertion track. Insertion trauma was evaluated histologically. MAIN RESULTS Evoked auditory field potentials were recorded from ring and micro-electrodes in the vicinity of the medial geniculate body. Spiking activity was recorded from 81% of the microelectrodes approaching the MGB. Histological examination showed localized surgical trauma along the implant. The extent of haemorrhage surrounding the track was measured and found to be significantly reduced with the slim electrodes (541 ± 455 µm vs. 827 ± 647 µm; P < 0.001). Scoring of the trauma, focusing on tissue disruption, haemorrhage, oedema of glial parenchyma and pyknosis, revealed a significantly lower trauma score for the slim electrodes (P < 0.0001). SIGNIFICANCE The slim electrodes reduced the extent of acute trauma, while still providing adequate electrode impedance for both stimulating and recording, and providing the option to target stimulate smaller volumes of tissue. The incorporation of microelectrodes into the electrode array may allow for a simplified, single-step surgical approach where confirmatory micro-targeting is done with the same lead used for permanent implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Villalobos
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dalrymple WA, Pusso A, Sperling SA, Flanigan JL, Huss DS, Harrison MB, Elias WJ, Shah BB, Barrett MJ. Comparison of Parkinson's Disease Patients' Characteristics by Indication for Deep Brain Stimulation: Men Are More Likely to Have DBS for Tremor. TREMOR AND OTHER HYPERKINETIC MOVEMENTS (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2019; 9:tre-09-676. [PMID: 31572622 PMCID: PMC6749750 DOI: 10.7916/tohm.v0.676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background We investigated whether the characteristics of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients differ based on the primary indication for deep brain stimulation (DBS). Methods We reviewed data for 149 consecutive PD patients who underwent DBS at the University of Virginia. Patients were categorized based on primary surgical indication, and clinical characteristics were compared between groups. Results Twenty-nine (93.5%) of 31 PD patients who underwent DBS for medication refractory tremor were men, and 66 (62.3%) of 106 PD patients who underwent DBS for motor fluctuations were men (p = 0.001). Other primary indications for DBS were tremor and fluctuations (n = 5), medication intolerance (n = 5), and dystonia (n = 2). Discussion Patients who underwent DBS for medication refractory tremor were predominantly men, while patients who had DBS for motor fluctuations approximated the gender distribution of PD. Possible explanations are that men with PD are more likely to develop medication refractory tremor or undergo surgery for medication refractory tremor in PD compared to women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Alex Dalrymple
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Antonia Pusso
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott A Sperling
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Joseph L Flanigan
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Diane S Huss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - W Jeffrey Elias
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Binit B Shah
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Matthew J Barrett
- Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Patel UK, Anwar A, Saleem S, Malik P, Rasul B, Patel K, Yao R, Seshadri A, Yousufuddin M, Arumaithurai K. Artificial intelligence as an emerging technology in the current care of neurological disorders. J Neurol 2019; 268:1623-1642. [PMID: 31451912 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09518-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has influenced all aspects of human life and neurology is no exception to this growing trend. The aim of this paper is to guide medical practitioners on the relevant aspects of artificial intelligence, i.e., machine learning, and deep learning, to review the development of technological advancement equipped with AI, and to elucidate how machine learning can revolutionize the management of neurological diseases. This review focuses on unsupervised aspects of machine learning, and how these aspects could be applied to precision neurology to improve patient outcomes. We have mentioned various forms of available AI, prior research, outcomes, benefits and limitations of AI, effective accessibility and future of AI, keeping the current burden of neurological disorders in mind. DISCUSSION The smart device system to monitor tremors and to recognize its phenotypes for better outcomes of deep brain stimulation, applications evaluating fine motor functions, AI integrated electroencephalogram learning to diagnose epilepsy and psychological non-epileptic seizure, predict outcome of seizure surgeries, recognize patterns of autonomic instability to prevent sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), identify the pattern of complex algorithm in neuroimaging classifying cognitive impairment, differentiating and classifying concussion phenotypes, smartwatches monitoring atrial fibrillation to prevent strokes, and prediction of prognosis in dementia are unique examples of experimental utilizations of AI in the field of neurology. Though there are obvious limitations of AI, the general consensus among several nationwide studies is that this new technology has the ability to improve the prognosis of neurological disorders and as a result should become a staple in the medical community. CONCLUSION AI not only helps to analyze medical data in disease prevention, diagnosis, patient monitoring, and development of new protocols, but can also assist clinicians in dealing with voluminous data in a more accurate and efficient manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urvish K Patel
- Department of Neurology and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Arsalan Anwar
- Department of Neurology, UH Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sidra Saleem
- Department of Neurology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Preeti Malik
- Department of Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bakhtiar Rasul
- Department of Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karan Patel
- Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert Yao
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University and Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Ashok Seshadri
- Department of Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic Health System, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rizzone MG, Martone T, Balestrino R, Lopiano L. Genetic background and outcome of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019; 64:8-19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
43
|
Hell F, Palleis C, Mehrkens JH, Koeglsperger T, Bötzel K. Deep Brain Stimulation Programming 2.0: Future Perspectives for Target Identification and Adaptive Closed Loop Stimulation. Front Neurol 2019; 10:314. [PMID: 31001196 PMCID: PMC6456744 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation has developed into an established treatment for movement disorders and is being actively investigated for numerous other neurological as well as psychiatric disorders. An accurate electrode placement in the target area and the effective programming of DBS devices are considered the most important factors for the individual outcome. Recent research in humans highlights the relevance of widespread networks connected to specific DBS targets. Improving the targeting of anatomical and functional networks involved in the generation of pathological neural activity will improve the clinical DBS effect and limit side-effects. Here, we offer a comprehensive overview over the latest research on target structures and targeting strategies in DBS. In addition, we provide a detailed synopsis of novel technologies that will support DBS programming and parameter selection in the future, with a particular focus on closed-loop stimulation and associated biofeedback signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Hell
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
- Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
- Department of Translational Neurodegeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan H. Mehrkens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Koeglsperger
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
- Department of Translational Neurodegeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Bötzel
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Varghese J, Niewöhner S, Soto-Rey I, Schipmann-Miletić S, Warneke N, Warnecke T, Dugas M. A Smart Device System to Identify New Phenotypical Characteristics in Movement Disorders. Front Neurol 2019; 10:48. [PMID: 30761078 PMCID: PMC6363699 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease and Essential Tremor are two of the most common movement disorders and are still associated with high rates of misdiagnosis. Collected data by technology-based objective measures (TOMs) has the potential to provide new promising and highly accurate movement data for a better understanding of phenotypical characteristics and diagnostic support. A technology-based system called Smart Device System (SDS) is going to be implemented for multi-modal high-resolution acceleration measurement of patients with PD or ET within a clinical setting. The 2-year prospective observational study is conducted to identify new phenotypical biomarkers and train an Artificial Intelligence System. The SDS is going to be integrated and tested within a 20-min assessment including smartphone-based questionnaires, two smartwatches at both wrists and tablet-based Archimedean spirals drawing for deeper tremor-analyses. The electronic questionnaires will cover data on medication, family history and non-motor symptoms. In this paper, we describe the steps for this novel technology-utilizing examination, the principal steps for data analyses and the targeted performances of the system. Future work considers integration with Deep Brain Stimulation, dissemination into further sites and patient's home setting as well as integration with further data sources as neuroimaging and biobanks. Study Registration ID on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03638479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Varghese
- Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Stephan Niewöhner
- Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Iñaki Soto-Rey
- Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Nils Warneke
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Tobias Warnecke
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Martin Dugas
- Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Grado LL, Johnson MD, Netoff TI. Bayesian adaptive dual control of deep brain stimulation in a computational model of Parkinson's disease. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006606. [PMID: 30521519 PMCID: PMC6298687 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we present a novel Bayesian adaptive dual controller (ADC) for autonomously programming deep brain stimulation devices. We evaluated the Bayesian ADC's performance in the context of reducing beta power in a computational model of Parkinson's disease, in which it was tasked with finding the set of stimulation parameters which optimally reduced beta power as fast as possible. Here, the Bayesian ADC has dual goals: (a) to minimize beta power by exploiting the best parameters found so far, and (b) to explore the space to find better parameters, thus allowing for better control in the future. The Bayesian ADC is composed of two parts: an inner parameterized feedback stimulator and an outer parameter adjustment loop. The inner loop operates on a short time scale, delivering stimulus based upon the phase and power of the beta oscillation. The outer loop operates on a long time scale, observing the effects of the stimulation parameters and using Bayesian optimization to intelligently select new parameters to minimize the beta power. We show that the Bayesian ADC can efficiently optimize stimulation parameters, and is superior to other optimization algorithms. The Bayesian ADC provides a robust and general framework for tuning stimulation parameters, can be adapted to use any feedback signal, and is applicable across diseases and stimulator designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan L. Grado
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Matthew D. Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Theoden I. Netoff
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Westin K, Lundstrom BN, Van Gompel J, Cooray G. Neurophysiological effects of continuous cortical stimulation in epilepsy - Spike and spontaneous ECoG activity. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 130:38-45. [PMID: 30476709 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effect of continuous subthreshold cortical stimulation (CSCS) over the seizure onset zone (SOZ) in epilepsy was analyzed to delineate the affected physiological processes. METHOD ECoG data was recorded over SOZ and adjacent regions in patients (n = 7) with refractory-epilepsy. Data was reviewed before and during 2 Hz cortical electrical stimulation. Group differences were estimated using ANOVA and correlation with Pearson's r. RESULTS CSCS reduced background ECoG power at SOZ (p < 0.05), increased spectral coherence (p < 0.05) and reduced spike rate (p < 0.01) over all recorded sites. Spectral power and coherence (p < 0.01) correlated with spike rate at SOZ but not with each other at any location. Spike morphology correlated with spike-rate over all recorded sites (p < 0.0001) and with spectral power and coherence at SOZ (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION This study shows changes in cortical electrophysiology during CSCS over the SOZ where spike rate reduction correlated with two independent electrophysiological parameters, background power and coherence. These results suggest the possibility of a causal relationship between spectral power, coherence and interictal spikes which may be related to seizure rate. SIGNIFICANCE Improved understanding of the effect of electrical stimulation on epileptic tissue could suggest improvements in stimulation paradigms to reduce seizure frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Westin
- Clinical Neurophysiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brian N Lundstrom
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, Sweden
| | - Jamie Van Gompel
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, Sweden
| | - Gerald Cooray
- Clinical Neurophysiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hacker ML, DeLong MR, Turchan M, Heusinkveld LE, Ostrem JL, Molinari AL, Currie AD, Konrad PE, Davis TL, Phibbs FT, Hedera P, Cannard KR, Drye LT, Sternberg AL, Shade DM, Tonascia J, Charles D. Effects of deep brain stimulation on rest tremor progression in early stage Parkinson disease. Neurology 2018; 91:e463-e471. [PMID: 29959266 PMCID: PMC6093763 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the progression of individual motor features was influenced by early deep brain stimulation (DBS), a post hoc analysis of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III) score (after a 7-day washout) was conducted from the 2-year DBS in early Parkinson disease (PD) pilot trial dataset. METHODS The prospective pilot trial enrolled patients with PD aged 50-75 years, treated with PD medications for 6 months-4 years, and no history of dyskinesia or other motor fluctuations, who were randomized to receive optimal drug therapy (ODT) or DBS plus ODT (DBS + ODT). At baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, all patients stopped all PD therapy for 1 week (medication and stimulation, if applicable). UPDRS-III "off" item scores were compared between the ODT and DBS + ODT groups (n = 28); items with significant between-group differences were analyzed further. RESULTS UPDRS-III "off" rest tremor score change from baseline to 24 months was worse in patients receiving ODT vs DBS + ODT (p = 0.002). Rest tremor slopes from baseline to 24 months favored DBS + ODT both "off" and "on" therapy (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). More ODT patients developed new rest tremor in previously unaffected limbs than those receiving DBS + ODT (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest the possibility that DBS in early PD may slow rest tremor progression. Future investigation in a larger cohort is needed, and these findings will be tested in the Food and Drug Administration-approved, phase III, pivotal, multicenter clinical trial evaluating DBS in early PD. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with early PD, DBS may slow the progression of rest tremor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory L Hacker
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mahlon R DeLong
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Maxim Turchan
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lauren E Heusinkveld
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anna L Molinari
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda D Currie
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Peter E Konrad
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Thomas L Davis
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Fenna T Phibbs
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Peter Hedera
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kevin R Cannard
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lea T Drye
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alice L Sternberg
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - David M Shade
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - James Tonascia
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - David Charles
- From the Departments of Neurology (M.L.H., M.T., L.E.H., A.L.M., A.D.C., T.L.D., F.T.P., P.H., D.C.) and Neurosurgery (P.E.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Neurology (M.R.D.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Laboratory of Molecular Immunology (L.E.H.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center (J.L.O.), Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (K.R.C.), Walter Reed National Military Center, Bethesda; and Department of Epidemiology (L.T.D., A.L.S., D.M.S., J.T.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhao X, Lhatoo SD. Seizure detection: do current devices work? And when can they be useful? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2018; 18:40. [PMID: 29796939 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-018-0849-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The unpredictability and apparent randomness of epileptic seizures is one of the most vexing aspects of epilepsy. Methods or devices capable of detecting seizures may help prevent injury or even death and significantly improve quality of life. Here, we summarize and evaluate currently available, unimodal, or polymodal detection systems for epileptic seizures, mainly in the ambulatory setting. RECENT FINDINGS There are two broad categories of detection devices: EEG-based and non-EEG-based systems. Wireless wearable EEG devices are now available both in research and commercial arenas. Neuro-stimulation devices are currently evolving and initial experiences of these show potential promise. As for non-EEG devices, different detecting systems show different sensitivity according to the different patient and seizure types. Regardless, when used in combination, these modalities may complement each other to increase positive predictive value. Although some devices with high sensitivity are promising, practical widespread use of such detection systems is still some way away. More research and experience are needed to evaluate the most efficient and integrated systems, to allow for better approaches to detection and prediction of seizures. The concept of closed-loop systems and prompt intervention may substantially improve quality of life for patients and carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuhe Zhao
- Epilepsy Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.,Neurology Department, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
| | - Samden D Lhatoo
- Epilepsy Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. .,NIH/NINDS Center for SUDEP Research, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chen S, Gao G, Feng T, Zhang J. Chinese expert consensus on programming deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson's disease. Transl Neurodegener 2018; 7:11. [PMID: 29719720 PMCID: PMC5925823 DOI: 10.1186/s40035-018-0116-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) therapy for the treatment of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is now a well-established option for some patients. Postoperative standardized programming processes can improve the level of postoperative management and programming, relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. Main body In order to improve the quality of the programming, the experts on DBS and PD in neurology and neurosurgery in China reviewed the relevant literatures and combined their own experiences and developed this expert consensus on the programming of deep brain stimulation in patients with PD in China. Conclusion This Chinese expert consensus on postoperative programming can standardize and improve postoperative management and programming of DBS for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengdi Chen
- 1Department of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025 China
| | - Guodong Gao
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, 710038 China
| | - Tao Feng
- 3Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050 China
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050 China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rodrigues NB, Mithani K, Meng Y, Lipsman N, Hamani C. The Emerging Role of Tractography in Deep Brain Stimulation: Basic Principles and Current Applications. Brain Sci 2018; 8:brainsci8020023. [PMID: 29382119 PMCID: PMC5836042 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8020023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2017] [Revised: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an MRI-based technique that delineates white matter tracts in the brain by tracking the diffusion of water in neural tissue. This methodology, known as “tractography”, has been extensively applied in clinical neuroscience to explore nervous system architecture and diseases. More recently, tractography has been used to assist with neurosurgical targeting in functional neurosurgery. This review provides an overview of DTI principles, and discusses current applications of tractography for improving and helping develop novel deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson B Rodrigues
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
| | - Karim Mithani
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Ying Meng
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Clement Hamani
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|