Targeted nanodelivery of siRNA against KRAS G12D inhibits pancreatic cancer

Brain-targeted polymersomes mediating RNAi of STAT3 sensitize glioblastoma to temozolomide and immunotherapy

Glioblastoma (GBM) is among the most aggressive brain tumors, presenting significant therapeutic challenges due to intrinsic and acquired resistance to treatment, alongside a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). While temozolomide (TMZ) is the standard chemotherapeutic agent with the ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), its clinical efficacy is often limited. Here, we report a strategy employing Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) peptide-functionalized polymersomes loaded with small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Apstat3) to amplify the anti-GBM effects of TMZ and immunotherapy. Apstat3 demonstrated small, uniform particle sizes, stability in siRNA encapsulation, and effective downregulation of STAT3 and O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in GL261 cells, sensitizing these tumor cells to TMZ. The combinatorial approach not only significantly inhibited GBM cell proliferation, migration and invasion but also improved dendritic cells (DCs) maturation under TME-mimicking environment. In orthotopic GL261 mouse models, intravenous injection of Apstat3 co-administered with oral TMZ resulted in a twofold increase in median survival and reshaped the TME. Notably, combined treatment with anti-CTLA4 therapy tripled median survival to 64 days, achieving complete remission observed in 20% of the mice. This siSTAT3 delivery strategy holds promise for enhancing GBM treatment outcomes.

Polymersome-mediated Cbl-b silencing activates T cells against solid tumors

Unleashing T cell function is critical for efficacious cancer immunotherapy. Here, we present an in vivo T cell activation strategy by silencing Casitas B-lineage lymphoma proto-oncogene b (Cbl-b), an intracellular checkpoint, to effectively combat solid tumors. The polymersomes are able to efficiently load and deliver siRNA against cblb to T cells both in vitro and in vivo, successfully silencing the cblb gene expression in primary T cells and enhancing the IL-2 receptor CD25 expression, which in turn enhances T cell function and prevents T cell exhaustion. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that siRNA against cblb caused an effective inhibition of tumor progression in subcutaneous B16-F10 and LLC models, in which a significant increase of effector T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and an increase of effector T cells and a significant decrease of Treg cells in the tumor were clearly observed. This polymersome-mediated down-regulation of the cblb gene in T cells provides a promising approach for activating T cells and enhancing their anti-tumor capacity.

Targeted internalization and activation of glycosidic switch liposomes by a biological macromolecule mPEG×EphA2 increases therapeutic efficacy against lung cancer

Glycosidic switch liposome (GSL) technology efficiently encapsulates and stabilizes potent anticancer drugs in liposomes using a reversible glucuronide ester. Enzymatic hydrolysis of the glucuronide switch in target cell lysosomes produces parental drug. Our study examined the potential of a bispecific macromolecule, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) engager (mPEG×EphA2), generated by fusing a humanized anti-methoxy PEG (mPEG) Fab with an anti-EphA2 single-chain antibody, to increase GSL uptake into cancer cells and boost the anticancer activity by targeting PEG on GSL and an internalizing tumor antigen. Combining GSL with the PEG engager creates αEphA2/GSL, targeting cancer cells to generate topoisomerase I poison 9-aminocamptothecin (9 AC) for cell killing. Targeted liposomes can bind CL1-5 human lung adenocarcinoma cells and increase GSL internalization from 0 % to 62.4 % in 60 min. αEphA2/GSL showed slightly higher cellular cytotoxicity than non-targeted GSL, but targeted GSL increased 9 AC intratumoral concentrations by 8.4 fold at 24 h. The 9 AC tumor/blood ratio of αEphA2/GSL was nearly 6-fold higher than αDNS/GSL (control engager GSL). Using targeted GSL, five of seven mice with solid CL1-5 tumors were cured. The mPEG×EphA2 engager can enhance GSL drug uptake and generation, boosting lung cancer treatment efficacy, suggesting that αEphA2/GSL is a promising treatment for tumors overexpressing EphA2.

Extensive Review of Nanomedicine Strategies Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in PDAC

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers in the world, mainly because of its powerful pro-connective tissue proliferation matrix and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which promote tumor progression and metastasis. In addition, the extracellular matrix leads to vascular collapse, increased interstitial fluid pressure, and obstruction of lymphatic return, thereby hindering effective drug delivery, deep penetration, and immune cell infiltration. Therefore, reshaping the TME to enhance tumor perfusion, increase deep drug penetration, and reverse immune suppression has become a key therapeutic strategy. Traditional therapies for PDAC, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, face significant limitations. Surgery is challenging due to tumor location and growth, while chemotherapy and radiation are hindered by the dense extracellular matrix and immunosuppressive TME. In recent years, the advancement of nanotechnology has provided new opportunities to improve drug efficacy. Nanoscale drug delivery systems (NDDSs) provide several advantages, including improved drug stability in vivo, enhanced tumor penetration, and reduced systemic toxicity. However, the clinical translation of nanotechnology in PDAC therapy faces several challenges. These include the need for precise targeting and control over drug release, potential immune responses to the nanocarriers, and the scalability and cost-effectiveness of production. This article provides an overview of the latest nanobased methods for achieving better therapeutic outcomes and overcoming drug resistance. We pay special attention to TME-targeted therapy in the context of PDAC, discuss the advantages and limitations of current strategies, and emphasize promising new developments. By emphasizing the enormous potential of NDDSs in improving the treatment outcomes of patients with PDAC, while critically discussing the limitations of traditional therapies and the challenges faced by nanotechnology in achieving clinical breakthroughs, our review paves the way for future research in this rapidly developing field.

Advancements in gene therapies targeting mutant KRAS in cancers

Mutations in the KRAS gene are well-known tumourigenic drivers of colorectal, pancreatic and lung cancers. Mechanistically, these mutations promote uncontrolled cell proliferation and alter the tumour microenvironment during early carcinoma stages. Given their critical carcinogenic functions, significant progress has been made in developing KRAS inhibitors for cancer treatment. However, clinical applications of these KRAS inhibitor compounds are limited to specific cancer types which carry the relevant KRAS mutations. Additionally, clinical findings have shown that these compounds can induce moderate to serious side effects. Therefore, new approaches have emerged focusing on the development of universal therapeutics capable of targeting a wider range of KRAS mutations, minimising toxicity and enhancing the therapeutic efficacy. This review aims to examine these therapeutic strategies in the context of cancer treatment. It firstly provides an overview of fundamental KRAS biology within the cell signalling landscape and how KRAS mutations are associated with cancer pathogenesis. Subsequently, it introduces the development of current KRAS inhibitors which target certain KRAS mutants in different types of cancer. It then explores the potential of gene therapy approaches, including siRNA, miRNA and CRISPR methodologies. Furthermore, it discusses the use of lipid-based nanocarriers to deliver gene cargos for targeting KRAS gene mutants. Finally, it provides the insights into the future prospects for combatting KRAS mutation-associated cancers.

Bioresponsive Polymeric Nanoparticles: From Design, Targeted Therapy to Cancer Immunotherapy

Bioresponsive polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) that are capable of delivering and releasing therapeutics and biotherapeutics to target sites have attracted vivid interest in cancer therapy and immunotherapy. In contrast to enthusiastic evolution in the academic world, the clinical translation of these smart systems is scarce, partly due to concerns about safety, stability, complexity, and scalability. The moderate targetability, responsivity, and benefits are other concerns. In the past 17 years, we have devoted ourselves to exploring elegant strategies to address the above basic and translational problems by introducing diverse functional groups and/or targeting ligands to safe biomedical materials, such as biodegradable polymers and water-soluble polymers. This minimal modification is critical for further clinical translation. We have tailor-made various bioresponsive NPs including shell-sheddable and/or acid-sensitive biodegradable NPs, disulfide-cross-linked biodegradable micelles and polymersomes, and blood-brain barrier (BBB)-permeable NPs, to target different tumors. This perspective provides an overview of our work path toward targeted nanomedicines and personalized vaccines, which might inspire clinical translation and future research on cancer therapy.

PFOS and Its Commercial Alternative, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, Induce Multidrug Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), specifically perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and its alternative, 2-[(6-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6-dodecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethanesulfonic acid (6:2 Cl-PFESA), are associated with environmental health concerns and potential cancer progression. However, their impact on multidrug resistance (MDR) in pancreatic cancer (PC) chemotherapy remains unclear. Here, we employed drug-sensitivity assays, including IC50 calculations, in vitro and in vivo models with various chemotherapeutics, and paclitaxel (PTX) as a representative agent, combined with transcriptomic/proteomic sequencing and clinical prognostic analysis, to identify MDR-related genes and validate their relevance, with the objective of establishing the correlation between PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure and MDR in PC at molecular, cellular, and animal model levels. Our findings demonstrate that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure increases the drug IC50 in three different PC cell lines for various chemotherapeutic agents. Compared with PFOS, 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrated a more pro-MDR effect on PC cells in vitro. In vivo experiments further revealed that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposures significantly reduced the efficacy of PTX in PC, with inhibition rates dropping from 78.3% to 23.8%/6.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). This effect was driven by the aberrant activation of the PI3K-ABCB1 pathway, with 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrating a stronger capacity to promote this signal pathway's expression and function compared with PFOS. These data suggest that exposure to PFAS may elevate the risk of MDR and subsequent disease progression. Although marketed as a safer alternative to PFOS, the notable impact of 6:2 Cl-PFESA on MDR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive assessment of its potential carcinogenic risks.

Nano- and Micro-Platforms in Therapeutic Proteins Delivery for Cancer Therapy: Materials and Strategies

Proteins have emerged as promising therapeutics in oncology due to their great specificity. Many treatment strategies are developed based on protein biologics, such as immunotherapy, starvation therapy, and pro-apoptosis therapy, while some protein biologics have entered the clinics. However, clinical translation is severely impeded by instability, short circulation time, poor transmembrane transportation, and immunogenicity. Micro- and nano-particles-based drug delivery platforms are designed to solve those problems and enhance protein therapeutic efficacy. This review first summarizes the different types of therapeutic proteins in clinical and research stages, highlighting their administration limitations. Next, various types of micro- and nano-particles are described to demonstrate how they can overcome those limitations. The potential of micro- and nano-particles are then explored to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of proteins by combinational therapies. Finally, the challenges and future directions of protein biologics carriers are discussed for optimized protein delivery.

Revisiting the standards of cancer detection and therapy alongside their comparison to modern methods

In accordance with the World Health Organization data, cancer remains at the forefront of fatal diseases. An upward trend in cancer incidence and mortality has been observed globally, emphasizing that efforts in developing detection and treatment methods should continue. The diagnostic path typically begins with learning the medical history of a patient; this is followed by basic blood tests and imaging tests to indicate where cancer may be located to schedule a needle biopsy. Prompt initiation of diagnosis is crucial since delayed cancer detection entails higher costs of treatment and hospitalization. Thus, there is a need for novel cancer detection methods such as liquid biopsy, elastography, synthetic biosensors, fluorescence imaging, and reflectance confocal microscopy. Conventional therapeutic methods, although still common in clinical practice, pose many limitations and are unsatisfactory. Nowadays, there is a dynamic advancement of clinical research and the development of more precise and effective methods such as oncolytic virotherapy, exosome-based therapy, nanotechnology, dendritic cells, chimeric antigen receptors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, natural product-based therapy, tumor-treating fields, and photodynamic therapy. The present paper compares available data on conventional and modern methods of cancer detection and therapy to facilitate an understanding of this rapidly advancing field and its future directions. As evidenced, modern methods are not without drawbacks; there is still a need to develop new detection strategies and therapeutic approaches to improve sensitivity, specificity, safety, and efficacy. Nevertheless, an appropriate route has been taken, as confirmed by the approval of some modern methods by the Food and Drug Administration.

Nanoparticles with Active Targeting Ability and Acid Responsiveness for an Enhanced Antitumor Effect of Docetaxel

Docetaxel (DOC) is commonly used in cancer treatment, especially for breast cancer. However, there are severe side effects in clinical application. In order to deliver docetaxel more effectively, a novel, active targeting acid-responsive polymer called cRGD-PAE-PEG-DSPE was developed. The polymer structure incorporated poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as the hydrophilic segment, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DSPE) as the hydrophobic segment, and poly(β-amino ester) (PAE) as the acid-responsive group, which was grafted onto the PEG. Furthermore, c(RGDyC) was grafted onto PAE to confer active targeting capability. Through self-assembly, docetaxel was encapsulated in RAED@DOC. Through in vitro experiments, it was confirmed that RAED@DOC had good serum stability and acid responsiveness, as well as enhanced uptake by MDA-MB-231 cells. Additionally, the antitumor efficiency in vivo and histopathological analysis showed that RAED@DOC exhibited higher antitumor activity and lower systemic toxicity in comparison to free docetaxel. These results suggested that RAED@DOC had considerable potential clinical use.

Nucleic Acid-Based Approaches to Tackle KRAS Mutant Cancers

Activating mutations in KRAS are highly relevant to various cancers, driving persistent efforts toward the development of drugs that can effectively inhibit KRAS activity. Previously, KRAS was considered 'undruggable'; however, the recent advances in our understanding of RNA and nucleic acid chemistry and delivery formulations have sparked a paradigm shift in the approach to KRAS inhibition. We are currently witnessing a large wave of next-generation drugs for KRAS mutant cancers-nucleic acid-based therapeutics. In this review, we discuss the current progress in targeting KRAS mutant tumors and outline significant developments in nucleic acid-based strategies. We delve into their mechanisms of action, address existing challenges, and offer insights into the current clinical trial status of these approaches. We aim to provide a thorough understanding of the potential of nucleic acid-based strategies in the field of KRAS mutant cancer therapeutics.

Bioresponsive Chimaeric Polymersomes Mediate Sustained and Liver-Specific siRNA Transfection In Vivo

The silencing of disease-causing genes with small interfering RNA (siRNA) offers a particularly effective therapeutic strategy for different disorders; however, its clinical efficacy relies on the development of nontoxic and tissue-specific delivery vehicles. Herein, we report that bioresponsive chimaeric polymersomes (BCP) with short poly(ethylenimine) as inner shell mediate highly efficacious, sustained, and liver-specific siRNA transfection in vivo. BCP exhibited remarkable encapsulation efficiencies of siRNA (95-100%) at siRNA-feeding contents of 15-25 wt %, to afford stable, small-sized (55-64 nm), and neutral-charged BCP-siRNA. siApoB-Loaded BCP (BCP-siApoB) outperformed lipofectamine counterparts and silenced 93% of ApoB mRNA in HepG2 cells at 50 nM siApoB without inducing cytotoxicity. Intriguingly, the in vivo studies using wild-type C57BL/6 mice revealed that BCP-siApoB preferentially accumulated in the liver, and a single dose of 4.5 mg/kg achieved over 90% downregulation of ApoB mRNA for at least 10 days. The systemic administration of BCP-siApoB at 4.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 1.5 mg/kg weekly in diet-induced obese mice could also achieve up to 80% silencing of ApoB mRNA. The liver specificity and silencing efficacy of BCP-siApoB could further be improved by decorating it with the trivalent N-acetylgalactosamine (TriGalNAc) ligand. These bioresponsive and liver-specific chimaeric polymersomes provide an enabling technology for siRNA therapy of various liver-related diseases.