Rationale and design of the ARAMIS trial: Anakinra versus placebo, a double blind randomized controlled trial for the treatment of acute myocarditis

Anti-inflammatory Therapies for Ischemic Heart Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The inclusion of immunomodulatory strategies as supportive therapies in ischemic heart disease (IHD) has garnered significant support over recent years. Several such approaches appear to be unified through their ultimate target, the NLRP3 inflammasome. This review presents a brief update on immunomodulatory strategies in the continuum of conditions constituting ischemic heart disease and emphasising on the seemingly unifying mechanism of NLRP3 activation as well as modulation across these conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

The NLRP3 inflammasome is a multiprotein complex assembled upon inflammatory stimulation, causing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and initiating pyroptosis. The NLRP3 pathway is relevant in inflammatory signalling of cardiac immune cells as well as non-immune cells in the myocardium, including cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. In addition to a focus on clinical outcome and efficacy trials of targeting NLRP3-related pathways, the potential connection between immunomodulation in cardiology and the NLRP3 pathway is currently being explored in preclinical trials. Colchicine, cytokine-based approaches and SGLT2 inhibitors have emerged as promising agents. However, the conditions comprising IHD including atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic cardiomyopathy/heart failure (iCMP/HF) are not equally amenable to immunomodulation with the respective drugs. Atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy are affected by chronic inflammation, but the immunomodulatory approach to acute inflammation in the post-MI setting remains a pharmacological challenge, as detrimental and regenerative effects of myocardial inflammation are initiated in unison. The NLRP3 inflammasome lies at the center of cell mediated inflammation in IHD. Recent trial evidence has highlighted anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine, interleukin-based therapy as well as SGLT2i in IHD and that the respective drugs modulate the NLRP3 inflammasome.

How do serum cytokine levels change in myocarditis and inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy relative to healthy individuals? A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Myocarditis is an inflammatory heart disease resulting from infections, toxic exposures or autoimmune reactions. Irrespective of the factors responsible for this disease, cytokines play an important role in regulating the immunological response involved in its development and progression. Accordingly, this protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis summarising previous research on serum and plasma levels of cytokines in patients with myocarditis and inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Four scientific databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science, will be searched. The estimated date of the search will be 30 March 2024. Each stage of the review, including the study selection, data extraction, risk of bias and quality of evidence assessments, will be performed in duplicate. Studies meeting the following criteria will be eligible for inclusion: (1) studies involving 'myocarditis' or 'inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy' and (2) studies are required to report serum levels of any cytokine. Meta-analyses will be used to summarise serum levels of each cytokine if possible. Subgroup analysis will be stratified by age, sex, sample size, New York Heart Association scale, cardiac Troponin T, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, C reactive protein, number of lymphocytes per mm2 in the endomyocardial biopsy.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION

This study does not require ethics approval. After completion, the results will be published in a peer-reviewed paper. Data generated during the study will be published in an open access repository.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024519625.

Management of acute myocarditis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations

The management of acute myocarditis (AM) is addressed in multiple clinical guidelines. We systematically reviewed current guidelines developed by national and international medical organizations on the management of AM to aid clinical practice. Publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane were identified between 1 January 2013 and 12 April 2024. Additionally, the websites of relevant organizations and the Guidelines International Network, Guideline Central, and NHS knowledge and library hub were reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, two reviewers assessed the rigour of guideline development, and one reviewer extracted the recommendations. Two of the three guidelines identified showed good rigour of development. Those rigorously developed agreed on the definition of AM, sampling serum troponin as part of the workflow for AM, testing for B-type natriuretic peptides in heart failure, key diagnostic imaging in the form of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, coronary angiography to exclude significant coronary disease, indications for endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), and indications for immunosuppression and advanced treatment options. Discrepancies exist in sampling creatine kinase-myocardial bound as a marker of myocardial injury, indications for EMB, and indications for immunosuppression and treatment of uncomplicated AM. Evidence is lacking for the use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for myocardial imaging, exercise restriction, follow-up measures, and genetic testing, and there are few high-quality randomized trials to support treatment recommendations. Recommendations for management of AM in the guidelines have largely been developed from expert opinion rather than trial data.

Cellular Immunology of Myocarditis: Lights and Shades-A Literature Review

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium with heterogeneous etiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis; when it is associated with myocardial dysfunction, this identifies the entity of inflammatory cardiomyopathy. In the last few decades, the relevance of the immune system in myocarditis onset and progression has become evident, thus having crucial clinical relevance in terms of treatment and prognostic stratification. In fact, the advances in cardiac immunology have led to a better characterization of the cellular subtypes involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory cardiomyopathy, whether the etiology is infectious or autoimmune/immune-mediated. The difference in the clinical course between spontaneous recovery to acute, subacute, or chronic progression to end-stage heart failure may be explained not only by classical prognostic markers but also through immune-pathological mechanisms at a cellular level. Nevertheless, much still needs to be clarified in terms of immune characterization and molecular mechanisms especially in biopsy-proven myocarditis. The aims of this review are to (1) describe inflammatory cardiomyopathy etiology, especially immune-mediated/autoimmune forms, (2) analyze recent findings on the role of different immune cells subtypes in myocarditis, (3) illustrate the potential clinical relevance of such findings, and (4) highlight the need of further studies in pivotal areas of myocarditis cellular immunology.

Novel Therapeutics and Upcoming Clinical Trials Targeting Inflammation in Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major health burden despite significant therapeutic advances accomplished over the last decades. It is widely and increasingly recognized that systemic inflammation not only represents a major cardiovascular risk and prognostic factor but also plays key pathogenic roles in CVD development and progression. Despite compelling preclinical evidence suggesting large potential of anti-inflammatory pharmacological interventions across numerous CVDs, clinical translation remains incomplete, mainly due to (1) yet undefined molecular signaling; (2) challenges of safety and efficacy profile of anti-inflammatory drugs; and (3) difficulties in identifying optimal patient candidates and responders to anti-inflammatory therapeutics, as well as optimal therapeutic windows. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated the safety/efficacy of canakinumab and colchicine in secondary cardiovascular prevention, providing confirmation for the involvement of a specific inflammatory pathway (NLRP3 [NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain-containing protein 3] inflammasome/IL [interleukin]-1β) in atherosclerotic CVD. Colchicine was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Diverse anti-inflammatory drugs targeting distinct inflammatory pathways are widely used for the management of other CVDs including myocarditis and pericarditis. Ongoing research efforts are directed to implementing anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies across a growing number of CVDs, through repurposing of available anti-inflammatory drugs and development of novel anti-inflammatory compounds, which are herein concisely discussed. This review also summarizes the main characteristics and findings of completed and upcoming randomized controlled trials directly targeting inflammation in CVDs, and discusses major challenges and future perspectives in the exciting and constantly expanding landscape of cardioimmunology.

Interleukin-receptor antagonist and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD) is worsened by chronic inflammatory diseases. Interleukin receptor antagonists (IL-RAs) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) inhibitors have been studied to see if they can prevent cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical benefits and harms of IL-RAs and TNF inhibitors in the primary and secondary prevention of ACVD.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Heart Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL plus, and clinical trial registries for ongoing and unpublished studies were searched in February 2024. The reference lists of relevant studies, reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports were searched to identify additional studies. No limitations on language, date of publication or study type were set.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that recruited people with and without pre-existing ACVD, comparing IL-RAs or TNF inhibitors versus placebo or usual care, were selected. The primary outcomes considered were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more review authors, working independently at each step, selected studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias and used GRADE to judge the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 58 RCTs (22,053 participants; 21,308 analysed), comparing medication efficacy with placebo or usual care. Thirty-four trials focused on primary prevention and 24 on secondary prevention. The interventions included IL-1 RAs (anakinra, canakinumab), IL-6 RA (tocilizumab), TNF-inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab) compared with placebo or usual care. The certainty of evidence was low to very low due to biases and imprecision; all trials had a high risk of bias. Primary prevention: IL-1 RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality(RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.58, 1 trial), myocardial infarction (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.04 to 12.48, I² = 39%, 2 trials), unstable angina (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.11, I² = 0%, 2 trials), stroke (RR 2.42, 95% CI 0.12 to 50.15; 1 trial), adverse events (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.22, I² = 54%, 3 trials), or infection (rate ratio 0.84, 95% 0.55 to 1.29, I² = 0%, 4 trials). Evidence is very uncertain about whether anakinra and cankinumab may reduce heart failure (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.94, I² = 0%, 3 trials). Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was not reported as an outcome. IL-6 RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.74, I² = 30%, 3 trials), myocardial infarction (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.04 to1.68, I² = 0%, 3 trials), heart failure (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.63, I² = 0%, 2 trials), PVD (RR 2.94, 95% CI 0.12 to 71.47, 1 trial), stroke (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.14, 1 trial), or any infection (rate ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.37, I2 = 18%, 5 trials). Adverse events may increase (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.23, I² = 33%, 5 trials). No trial assessed unstable angina. TNF inhibitors The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 1.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 4.99, I² = 10%, 3 trials), myocardial infarction (RR 2.61, 95% CI 0.11 to 62.26, 1 trial), stroke (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.80, I² = 0%; 3 trials), heart failure (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.06 to 12.76, 1 trial). Adverse events may increase (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.25, I² = 51%, 13 trials). No trial assessed unstable angina or PVD. Secondary prevention: IL-1 RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.06, I² = 0%, 8 trials), unstable angina (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.19, I² = 0%, 3 trials), PVD (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.73, I² = 38%, 3 trials), stroke (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.2, I² = 0%; 7 trials), heart failure (RR 0.91, 95% 0.5 to 1.65, I² = 0%; 7 trials), or adverse events (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.09, I² = 3%, 4 trials). There may be little to no difference between the groups in myocardial infarction (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.0.75 to 1.04, I² = 0%, 6 trials). IL6-RAs The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.96, I² = 0%, 2 trials), myocardial infarction (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.04, I² = 45%, 3 trials), unstable angina (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.02, 1 trial), stroke (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.25, 1 trial), adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.05, I² = 0%, 2 trials), or any infection (rate ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.36, I² = 0%, 4 trials). No trial assessed PVD or heart failure. TNF inhibitors The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of the intervention on all-cause mortality (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.95, I² = 47%, 5 trials), heart failure (RR 0.92, 95% 0.75 to 1.14, I² = 0%, 4 trials), or adverse events (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.56, I² = 32%, 2 trials). No trial assessed myocardial infarction, unstable angina, PVD or stroke. Adverse events may be underestimated and benefits inflated due to inadequate reporting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This Cochrane review assessed the benefits and harms of using interleukin-receptor antagonists and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic diseases compared with placebo or usual care. However, the evidence for the predetermined outcomes was deemed low or very low certainty, so there is still a need to determine whether these interventions provide clinical benefits or cause harm from this perspective. In summary, the different biases and imprecision in the included studies limit their external validity and represent a limitation to determining the effectiveness of the intervention for both primary and secondary prevention of ACVD.

Clinical Characteristics and Mechanisms of Acute Myocarditis

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05335928.

Rationale and design of the French cohort of acute myocarditis diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MyocarditIRM)

BACKGROUND

Acute myocarditis usually presents as chest pain with rising troponin and normal coronary arteries. Despite frequent favourable evolution at the acute phase, it is associated with heart failure and ventricular rhythm disorders, and is considered the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young, apparently healthy, adults. There are no specific recommendations for acute myocarditis diagnosis and management, only expert consensus, given the lack of large databases.

AIM

The main objective is to describe the contemporary presentation of acute myocarditis, its management and in-hospital outcomes. Secondary objectives are to investigate survival and event-free survival for up to 10years of follow-up, the determinants of prognosis, the modalities of treatment and follow-up and the gaps between expert consensus and real-life management.

METHODS

MyocarditIRM is a prospective multicentre cohort that enrolled 803 consecutive patients with acute myocarditis in 49 participating centres in France between 01 May 2016 and 28 February 2019. The diagnosis of acute myocarditis was acknowledged by cardiac magnetic resonance, using the Lake Louise Criteria. Exclusion criteria were age<18years, lack of health coverage, contraindication to cardiac magnetic resonance and refusal to participate. Detailed information was collected prospectively, starting at admission. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (diagnosis and follow-up) is analysed centrally by the certified core laboratory IHU ICAN. Ten years of follow-up for each patient is ensured by linking with the French National Health Database, and includes information on death, hospital admissions, major clinical events and drug consumption.

CONCLUSION

This prospective cohort with long-term follow-up represents the largest database on acute myocarditis worldwide, and will improve knowledge about its presentation, management and outcomes.

The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis in cardiovascular diseases

An intense, stereotyped inflammatory response occurs in response to ischaemic and non-ischaemic injury to the myocardium. The NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a finely regulated macromolecular protein complex that senses the injury and triggers and amplifies the inflammatory response by activation of caspase 1; cleavage of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18, to their mature forms; and induction of inflammatory cell death (pyroptosis). Inhibitors of the NLRP3 inflammasome and blockers of IL-1β and IL-18 activity have been shown to reduce injury to the myocardium and pericardium, favour resolution of the inflammation and preserve cardiac function. In this Review, we discuss the components of the NLRP3 inflammasome and how it is formed and activated in various ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiac pathologies (acute myocardial infarction, cardiac dysfunction and remodelling, atherothrombosis, myocarditis and pericarditis, cardiotoxicity and cardiac sarcoidosis). We also summarize current preclinical and clinical evidence from studies of agents that target the NLRP3 inflammasome and related cytokines.

Role of genetics in inflammatory cardiomyopathy

Traditional cardiomyopathy paradigms segregate inflammatory etiologies from those caused by genetic variants. An identified or presumed trigger is implicated in acute myocarditis or chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy but growing evidence suggests a significant proportion of patients have an underlying cardiomyopathy-associated genetic variant often even when a clear inflammatory trigger is identified. Recognizing a possible genetic contribution to inflammatory cardiomyopathy may have major downstream implications for both the patient and family. The presenting features of myocarditis (i.e. chest pain, arrhythmia, and/or heart failure) may provide insight into diagnostic considerations. One example is isolated cardiac sarcoidosis, a distinct inflammatory cardiomyopathy that carries diagnostic challenges and clinical overlap; genetic testing has increasingly reclassified cases of isolated cardiac sarcoidosis as genetic cardiomyopathy, notably altering management. On the other side, inflammatory presentations of genetic cardiomyopathies are likewise underappreciated and a growing area of investigation. Inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of several familial cardiomyopathies, especially arrhythmogenic phenotypes. Given these clinical scenarios, and the implications on clinical decision making such as initiation of immunosuppression, sudden cardiac death prevention, and family screening, it is important to recognize when genetics may be playing a role.

Germline HAVCR2/TIM-3 Checkpoint Inhibitor Receptor Deficiency in Recurrent Autoinflammatory Myocarditis

Myocarditis can be caused by viral infection, drug reaction or general inflammatory condition. To provide understanding on inflammatory myocarditis, we describe clinical, genetic, and immunological properties of a young male patient who suffered from recurrent myocarditis episodes since the age of four years. Electrocardiography, troponin I/T, echocardiography, myocardial magnetic resonance imaging and histological findings were consistent with recurrent myocarditis episodes. Homozygous c.245 A > G p.Tyr82Cys pathogenic variant in Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2 (HAVCR2) gene encoding T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3) receptor was found. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected when the patient was asymptomatic; CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphoblasts, CD56+ natural killer cells and CD14+ monocytes were negative for surface TIM-3 expression. In vitro, TLR4 mediated interleukin-1β (IL-1β) response was high after LPS/ATP stimulation. Clinical symptoms responded to IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra. TIM-3 p.Tyr82Cys CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation in vitro was unrestrained. Findings on IL-2, interferon gamma, regulatory T cells, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1, 3 and 4 phosphorylation, and PD-1 and LAG-3 checkpoint inhibitor receptor analyses were comparable to controls. We conclude that TIM-3 deficiency due to homozygous HAVCR2 c.245 A > G p.Tyr82Cys pathogenic variant in the patient described here is associated with autoinflammatory symptoms limited to early onset recurrent febrile myocarditis. Excessive IL-1β production and defective regulation of T cell proliferation may contribute to this clinical condition responsive to anakinra treatment.

Systematic Aetiological Assessment of Myocarditis: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Myocarditis is commonly diagnosed in the intensive care cardiology unit (ICCU). No current recommendation nor guideline aids exist for aetiological assessments.

METHODS

From September 2021 to October 2023, 84 patients with acute myocarditis underwent thorough and systematic serum and blood cell panel evaluations to determine the most common causes of myocarditis.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients (median age 34 years, range 22-41 years, 79% male), 16 presented with complicated myocarditis. The systematic aetiological assessment revealed that 36% of patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant, 12% for antinuclear antibodies, 8% for anti-heart antibodies, and 12% for anti-striated muscle antibodies. Viral serology did not yield any significant results. After the aetiological assessment, one patient was diagnosed with an autoimmune inflammatory disorder (Still's disease). T-cell subset analyses indicated that myocarditis severity tended to increase with the T-cell lymphopenia status.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive, systematic aetiological assessment was of limited value in terms of predicting the clinical or therapeutic outcomes in myocarditis patients presenting to the ICCU.

Pathogenic pathways and therapeutic targets of inflammation in heart diseases: A focus on Interleukin-1

BACKGROUND

An exuberant and dysregulated inflammatory response contributes to the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

METHODS

This narrative review includes original articles and reviews published over the past 20 years and found through PubMed. The following search terms (or combination of terms) were considered: "acute pericarditis," "recurrent pericarditis," "myocarditis," "cardiac sarcoidosis," "atherosclerosis," "acute myocardial infarction," "inflammation," "NLRP3 inflammasome," "Interleukin-1" and "treatment."

RESULTS

Recent evidence supports the role of inflammation across a wide spectrum of CVDs including myocarditis, pericarditis, inflammatory cardiomyopathies (i.e. cardiac sarcoidosis) as well as atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure. Interleukins (ILs) are the signalling mediators of the inflammatory response. The NACHT, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin-domain containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome play a key role in producing IL-1β, the prototypical pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in CVDs. Other pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. tumour necrosis factor) have been implicated in cardiac sarcoidosis. As a proof of this, IL-1 blockade has been proven efficacious in pericarditis and chronic coronary syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Tailored strategies aiming at quenching the inflammatory response have emerged as promising to treat CVDs. In this review article, we summarize recent evidence regarding the role of inflammation across a broad spectrum of CVDs. We also review novel evidence regarding targeted therapeutic strategies.