Management of cancer-associated thromboembolism in vulnerable population

Psychoactive drug use and prognosis in patients with cancer presenting with acute cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

The psychoactive drug consumption and the short- and long-term cardiovascular prognosis of patients with cancer admitted for acute cardiovascular events are not well established.

AIMS

To assess the prevalence of psychoactive drug use, in-hospital outcomes and 1-year prognosis in patients with cancer hospitalized for acute cardiovascular events.

METHODS

In a prospective multicentre study of all consecutive patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units, a history of cancer was recorded systematically. The primary outcome was the prevalence of psychoactive drugs detected by urine drug assay. The secondary outcomes were: the rate of in-hospital major adverse events, defined as all-cause death, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest; and the 1-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke.

RESULTS

Among 1499 patients recruited, 151 had a history of cancer (10%), including 61 (40%) with active cancer and 90 (60%) with cancer in remission. Among patients with a history of cancer, 39 (25.8%) tested positive for at least one psychoactive drug. Using a matching approach based on the likelihood of having a cancer, a history of cancer was not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital major adverse events (odds ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-3.45; P=0.3). However, a history of cancer was associated with a higher incidence of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio: 3.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.63-5.67; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of psychoactive drug use among patients with a history of cancer hospitalized for acute cardiovascular events was 25.8%. A history of cancer was an independent predictor of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

Management of thrombocytopenia and anticoagulant therapy in patients with hematological malignancy on chemotherapy: a binational prospective study (TAT study)

Anticoagulant use in patients with hematological malignancies treated on intensive chemotherapy represents a management challenge because of concomitant thrombocytopenia. This prospective multi-center cohort included 100 patients with hematological malignancies on anticoagulation. The aims of the study were to assess the incidence of WHO grade ≥ 2 bleeding, describe physician management strategies during thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 × 109//L), and examine short-term outcomes and risk factors for bleeding and thrombosis. Median patients age was 60 years and median duration of severe thrombocytopenia was 16 days. The 30-day cumulative incidence of WHO grade ≥ 2 bleeding was 29.3% (95% CI 19.4-39.8), grade 4 bleeding was 7.2% (95% CI 2.8-14.2) and incidence of thrombus recurrence/progression was 6.2% (95% CI 2.2-13.3). No deaths occurred. The majority of patients received full-dose anticoagulation with a high platelet transfusion threshold. Half of the bleeding episodes grade ≥ 2 occurred with platelets counts between 20 and 50 × 109/L. Longer period of full-dose anticoagulation during thrombocytopenia was associated with increased bleeding risk (16 days [IQR: 6-29] for participants who presented ≥ grade 2 bleeding versus 7 days for those who did not [IQR: 2-14], p < 0.001). So was a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 (HR = 9 [4.1-20], p < 0.001). Multiple myeloma diagnosis was associated with lower bleeding risk versus other hematological malignancies (HR = 0.2 [0.0-0.9], p = 0.05). Our study underscores the complex trade-off between preventing thrombotic events' progression or recurrence and avoidance of bleeding. We highlight specific clinical scenarios and consider different risk factors. Future randomized controlled trials are required for these complex situations to achieve a rationalization of their management.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The life expectancy of patients suffering from thrombosis associated with cancer has improved significantly, making them a chronic disease. Patients with thrombosis and cancer are fragile. Treated with anticoagulants, they remain at risk of complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consequently, news issues emerge for clinical practice: anticoagulation therapy personalization is required to optimize the benefit ratio, involving patient characteristics and cancer characteristics. During follow-up, prediction score are designed and investigated to help identify and discriminate patients at risk of venous thromboembolism recurrences and major bleedings. Considering the improved prognosis of patients with cancer and cancer-associated thrombosis, the question of extended treatment arises, representing a major unmet need to date. Finally, new strategies, in particular anti-XI agents that appear attractive options, are currently being evaluated in the treatment of thrombosis associated with cancer.

SUMMARY

The improved prognosis of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis is accompanied by new therapeutic strategies to improve the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment in these fragile patients, at risk of both venous thromboembolic recurrence and haemorrhagic complication.

Venous thrombosis and obesity: from clinical needs to therapeutic challenges

Weight bias and stigma have limited the awareness of the systemic consequences related to obesity. As the narrative evolves, obesity is emerging as a driver and enhancer of many pathological conditions. Among these, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a critical concern linked to obesity, ranking as the third most common cardiovascular condition. Obesity is recognized as a multifactorial risk factor for VTE, influenced by genetic, demographic, behavioral, and socio-economic conditions. Despite established links, the exact incidence of obesity related VTE in the general population remains largely unknown. The complexity of distinguishing between provoked and unprovoked VTE, coupled with gaps in obesity definition and assessment still complicates a tailored risk assessment of VTE risk. Obesity reactivity, hypercoagulability, and endothelial dysfunction are driven by the so-called 'adiposopathy'. This state of chronic inflammation and metabolic disturbance amplifies thrombin generation and alters endothelial function, promoting a pro-thrombotic environment. Additionally, the inflammation-induced clot formation-also referred to as 'immunothrombosis' further exacerbates VTE risk in people living with obesity. Furthermore, current evidence highlights significant gaps in the management of obesity related VTE, particularly concerning prophylaxis and treatment efficacy of anticoagulants in people living with obesity. This review underscores the need for tailored therapeutic approaches and well-designed clinical trials to address the unique challenges posed by obesity in VTE prevention and management. Advanced research and innovative strategies are imperative to improve outcomes and reduce the burden of VTE in people living with obesity.

Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A practical approach

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. Both cancer and its treatments increase the risk of developing VTE. Specific cancer types and individual patient comorbidities increase the risk of developing cancer-associated VTE, and the risk of bleeding is increased with anticoagulation therapies. The aims of this article are to summarize the latest evidence for treating cancer-associated VTE, discuss the practical considerations involved, and share best practices for VTE treatment in patients with cancer. The article pays particular attention to challenging contexts including patients with brain, lung, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tumors and those with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the article summarizes specific clinical scenarios that require additional treatment considerations, including extremes of body weight, nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances, compromised renal function, and anemia, and touches upon the relevance of drug-drug interactions. Historically, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used as therapy for cancer-associated VTE. The development of direct oral anticoagulants has provided additional treatment options, which, in certain instances, offer advantages over LMWHs. There are numerous factors that need to be considered when treating cancer-associated VTE, and although various treatment guidelines are helpful, they do not reflect each unique scenario that may arise in clinical practice. This article provides a summary of the latest evidence and a practical approach for treating cancer-associated VTE.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism"]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least 6months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly, and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond 6months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first 6months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Home treatment for patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism"]

Patients hospitalised with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), and notably patients with pulmonary embolism, often remain in hospital for extended periods due to the perceived risk of complications. However, several studies have shown that home treatment of selected patients is feasible and safe, with a low incidence of adverse events. This may offer clear benefits for patients' quality of life, hospital planning and cost to the health service. Nonetheless, there is a need for a VTE risk-stratification tool specifically addressing prognosis in patients with cancer. This may aid in the selection of low-risk patients with cancer and VTE who are suitable for outpatient treatment. Although several prognostic scores have been proposed, we suggest using a pragmatic clinical decision-making tool such as the Hestia criteria for selecting patients for home care in everyday clinical practice. Once patients have been discharged, it is mandatory to monitor patients regularly (we suggest after 3 days, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months, or more frequently if needed) with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, so that appropriate and timely remedial action can be taken in case of warning signs of complications. If patients are selected carefully and monitored effectively, many patients who experience acute VTE can be cared for safely at home.

COVID-19 and Antipsychotic Therapy: Unraveling the Thrombosis Risk

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study investigates the potential correlation between the increased use of antipsychotic medications and the rising incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). As psychiatric disorders surged, the consequential escalation in antipsychotic drug use raised concerns about thrombotic risks. We conducted a comprehensive literature review using PubMed, focusing on articles that intersected COVID-19, antipsychotic medication, and thrombosis. This approach allowed for a nuanced examination of the historical and recent data on antipsychotic drugs and their association with thrombotic events. Our findings reveal a notable link between the use of antipsychotic medications, particularly second-generation antipsychotics, and an increased risk of VTE, including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. This association was evident, despite variations in study designs and populations. The study underscores the need for cautious medication management in psychiatric care, especially during pandemic conditions like COVID-19, to mitigate thrombotic risks. It advocates a personalized approach to prescribing antipsychotics, considering individual patient factors and comorbidities, to balance the benefits against potential thrombotic complications.

Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment-related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least six months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond six months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first six months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Home treatment for patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Patients hospitalised with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), and notably patients with pulmonary embolism, often remain in hospital for extended periods due to the perceived risk of complications. However, several studies have shown that home treatment of selected patients is feasible and safe, with a low incidence of adverse events. This may offer clear benefits for patients' quality of life, hospital planning and cost to the health service. Nonetheless, there is a need for a VTE risk-stratification tool specifically addressing prognosis in patients with cancer. This may aid in the selection of low-risk patients with cancer and VTE who are suitable for outpatient treatment. Although several prognostic scores have been proposed, we suggest using a pragmatic clinical decision-making tool such as the Hestia criteria for selecting patients for home care in everyday clinical practice. Once patients have been discharged, it is mandatory to monitor patients regularly (we suggest after 3 days, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months, or more frequently if needed) with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, so that appropriate and timely remedial action can be taken in case of warning signs of complications. If patients are selected carefully and monitored effectively, many patients who experience acute VTE can be cared for safely at home.