Nonadherence to Multimodality Cancer Treatment Guidelines in the United States

Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis: One Decade Later

In 2012, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened a committee charged with addressing the quality of cancer care in the United States and providing recommendations to policymakers and the cancer care community on strategies to improve cancer care delivery from the time of diagnosis through end-of-life. The resulting committee report, titled Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis (2013), presented a conceptual framework that included six interconnected components of care with corresponding recommendations. Over the past decade, the delivery of high-quality of cancer care has become more challenging and increasingly demanding on the workforce. In this manuscript, we review the goals and recommendations made in 2013, describe progress to date, and offer insights into future dedicated efforts and/or new strategies needed to achieve high-quality cancer care.

Accuracy and consistency of publicly available Large Language Models as clinical decision support tools for the management of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Large Language Models (LLM; e.g., ChatGPT) may be used to assist clinicians and form the basis of future clinical decision support (CDS) for colon cancer. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the response accuracy of two LLM-powered interfaces in identifying guideline-based care in simulated clinical scenarios and (2) define response variation between and within LLMs.

METHODS

Clinical scenarios with "next steps in management" queries were developed based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Prompts were entered into OpenAI ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot in independent sessions, yielding four responses per scenario. Responses were compared to clinician-developed responses and assessed for accuracy, consistency, and verbosity.

RESULTS

Across 108 responses to 27 prompts, both platforms yielded completely correct responses to 36% of scenarios (n = 39). For ChatGPT, 39% (n = 21) were missing information and 24% (n = 14) contained inaccurate/misleading information. Copilot performed similarly, with 37% (n = 20) having missing information and 28% (n = 15) containing inaccurate/misleading information (p = 0.96). Clinician responses were significantly shorter (34 ± 15.5 words) than both ChatGPT (251 ± 86 words) and Copilot (271 ± 67 words; both p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Publicly available LLM applications often provide verbose responses with vague or inaccurate information regarding colon cancer management. Significant optimization is required before use in formal CDS.

Fertility-sparing surgical interventions for low-risk, non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

The primary treatment approach for addressing low-risk nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LR-NMGTN) in women desiring fertility preservation involves chemotherapy. An alternative option for treatment is fertility-sparing surgical interventions, either alone or in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy. The hypothesised advantages of choosing fertility-sparing surgery in cases of LR-NMGTN include potential avoidance of adverse effects associated with chemotherapy, potential reduction in the number of chemotherapy cycles required to achieve complete remission, and potential reduction in time to remission.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the benefits and harms of fertility-sparing surgical interventions, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to primary chemotherapy alone, for the treatment of women with low-risk, non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LR-NMGTN).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP on 31 January 2024. We also searched abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fertility-sparing surgical interventions, with or without subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy, versus primary chemotherapy as standard care for the treatment of women with LR-NMGTN.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We employed standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome, if available. We focused on the following outcomes: treatment success rate, relapse, disease-specific mortality, death due to treatment, pregnancy rate, quality of life, and any adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two RCTs, with a total of 151 participants contributing data to our analyses. Both studies used uterine curettage as the fertility-sparing surgical intervention. Fertility-sparing surgical intervention without subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy versus primary chemotherapy alone One RCT involving 62 participants with varying hCG (human chorionic gonadotrophin) levels evaluated this comparison. Most of our outcomes of interest were not measured in this study. The relative risk of experiencing any adverse event could not be estimated as chemotherapy adverse effects were not reported. The study reported that there were no surgical complications. Chemotherapy was administered to 50% of participants in the intervention group after curettage because their hCG levels increased. Fertility-sparing surgical intervention with subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy versus primary chemotherapy alone One RCT involving 89 participants with hCG levels < 5000 IU/L evaluated this comparison. We judged the risk of bias in the study to be high. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of uterine curettage with subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy on treatment success rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to1.23; 86 participants), relapse (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.31; 86 participants), pregnancy rate (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.34; 86 participants), and rate of adverse events (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.13; 86 participants), all very low certainty evidence. The relative risks of disease-specific mortality and death due to treatment could not be estimated as there were no deaths in either group. There were no results for quality of life as this outcome was not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Uterine curettage is the only fertility-sparing surgical intervention for LR-NMGTN that has been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. The evidence is very uncertain about the benefits and harms of uterine curettage, with or without subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to primary chemotherapy alone. The two available studies are small with a high risk of bias, and future research may find substantially different results for all reported outcomes. Larger RCTs, with appropriate clinical outcome measures, would be required to determine the benefits or harms of fertility-sparing surgical interventions for this population.

Patient COUNTS: A pilot navigation program for Asian American cancer patients

Many Asian American cancer patients face barriers to cancer care but little is known about their navigational needs. We designed and implemented a pilot study to provide culturally- and linguistically-appropriate navigation for Asian American cancer patients. We recruited Asian American adults age 21+ years, who spoke English, Cantonese, Mandarin, or Vietnamese, with newly diagnosed, stage I-III colorectal, liver, or lung cancer in the Northern California Bay Area. Participants were assigned a language-concordant patient navigator, who provided support and resources over 6 months. Surveys were administered at baseline, 3-, and 6-months to assess sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare access, quality of life (FACT-G), and cancer care needs. Participants' mean age was 65 years (range 38-81); 62% were men, 67% spoke Chinese, and 75% reported limited English proficiency. Forty-two percent of participants had lung, 38% colorectal, and 21% liver cancer. Of 24 participants who enrolled, 67% completed the program and 75% completed standard of care cancer treatment. The average total FACT-G score was 72.6 (SD 17) at baseline, 68.0 (SD 20) at 3 months, and 69.9 (SD 22) at 6 months. All participants reported that the program was culturally appropriate and would recommend it. Asian American cancer patients in a patient navigation program reported lower quality of life compared to the general adult cancer population. Even with navigation, 75% of participants reported completing standard of care treatment. While participants were satisfied with the program, more research is needed to address the quality of cancer care Asian American cancer patients receive.

Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Osteosarcoma in California: A Population-Based Analysis

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between guideline-concordant care (GCC) on the basis of national clinical practice guidelines and survival in children (0-14 years), adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years), and adults (40 years and older) with osteosarcoma, and to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with receipt of GCC and survival.

METHODS

We used data from the California Cancer Registry (CCR) on patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma during 2004-2019, with detailed treatment information extracted from the CCR text fields, including chemotherapy regimens. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1,716 patients, only 47% received GCC, with variation by age at diagnosis: 67% of children, 43% of AYAs, and 30% of adults. In multivariable models, patients who received part or all care (v none) at specialized cancer centers were more likely to receive GCC. AYAs and adults were less likely to receive GCC than children (odds ratio [OR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50] and OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.56], respectively). In a model excluding adults, patients treated by pediatric (v medical) oncologists were more likely to receive GCC (OR, 3.44 [95% CI, 2.40 to 4.94]). Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma at diagnosis who did not receive GCC had a greater hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.02 [95% CI, 1.55 to 2.63]) but no statistical differences were found in those diagnosed at earlier stages (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.43]).

CONCLUSION

GCC was associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma in California. However, we found disparities in the delivery of GCC, highlighting the need for target interventions to improve delivery of GCC in this patient population.

Treatment discordance in the utilization of neck dissection for stage I-II supraglottic tumors

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines began recommending the use of neck dissection during surgical management of stage I-II supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

METHODS

Trends and factors associated with the use of neck dissection during larynx-preserving surgery for patients with cT1-2, N0, M0 supraglottic LSCC in the National Cancer Database (2004-2020) were evaluated using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 2080 patients who satisfied study eligibility criteria, 633 (30.4%) underwent neck dissection. Between 2018 and 2020, the rate of neck dissection was 39.0% (114/292). After multivariable adjustment, academic facility type, undergoing biopsy prior to surgery, and more radical surgery were significant predictors of receiving neck dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this national analysis suggest that the utilization of guideline-concordant neck dissection for management of stage I-II supraglottic LSCC remains low and highlight the need to promote the practice of neck dissection for this patient population.

Uptake of doublet therapy for de novo metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer: a population-based drug utilisation study in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials have demonstrated prolonged survival with new upfront treatments in addition to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We describe patient characteristics, time trends and regional differences in uptake of these new treatment strategies in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This descriptive study consisted of men registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2022 with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer defined by the presence of metastases on imaging at the time of diagnosis. Life expectancy was calculated based on age, Charlson Comorbidity Index and a Drug Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

Within 6 months from diagnosis, 57% (1,677/2,959) of men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and more than 3 years of life expectancy had received docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide and/or radiotherapy. Over time, there was a 2-fold increase in uptake of any added treatment, mainly driven by a 6-fold increase in use of abiraterone, enzalutamide or apalutamide, with little change in use of other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Slightly more than half of men diagnosed with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and a life expectancy of at least 3 years received additions to standard ADT as recommended by national guidelines in 2019-2022 in Sweden. There was a 2-fold increase in use of these treatments during the study period; however, efforts to further increase adherence to guidelines are warranted.