Do-not-resuscitate orders among trauma patients

Honoring Advance Directives: A Scoping Review of Adherence and Impact on Value of Care

Introduction: End-of-life clinical decision making can trigger profound emotional and financial distress. Advance directives intend to guide clinicians and surrogate decision makers; it is difficult to know how often they are honored. Moreover, there is limited research on associations between resource use and honoring advance directives. Methods: We performed a scoping review of primary research articles on Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed using search terms involving honoring of advance directives and associations with health care value. Value was defined broadly and included any study in which the quality of care was assessed relative to cost. Results: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, with 17 related to honoring advance directives, six related to the value of care, and seven examining both dimensions. Evidence regarding advance directive efficacy was mixed. Ten of 23 (43%) demonstrated a positive impact of advance directives on concordant care, ten showed minimal or no care differences between patients with and without advance directives, and three showed mixed evidence. Higher rates of concordant care were associated with do-not-hospitalize orders and physician-orders-for-life-sustaining-treatment as compared to other types. Concerning value, four studies showed reduced hospital length of stay, hospital admissions, and overall costs, whereas five found no difference in these variables. Four considered theoretical value impacts of advance directives on patients, hospitals, and health systems with value varying by stakeholder. There was limited analysis of advance directive implementation practices. Conclusions: There is mixed evidence related to the efficacy of advance directives in aligning care with patient wishes and improving the quality of care relative to cost. Investigation of implementation practices may provide insight into factors determining these varied outcomes. This review highlights opportunities to improve upon methodology for studying advance directives and applying them effectively.

Reality of treatment for severely injured patients: are there age-specific differences?

BACKGROUND

Major trauma and its consequences are one of the leading causes of death worldwide across all age groups. Few studies have conducted comparative age-specific investigations. It is well known that children respond differently to major trauma than elderly patients due to physiological differences. The aim of this study was to analyze the actual reality of treatment and outcomes by using a matched triplet analysis of severely injured patients of different age groups.

METHODS

Data from the TraumaRegister DGU® were analyzed. A total of 56,115 patients met the following inclusion criteria: individuals with Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale > 2 and < 6, primary admission, from German-speaking countries, and treated from 2011-2020. Furthermore, three age groups were defined (child: 3-15 years; adult: 20-50 years; and elderly: 70-90 years). The matched triplets were defined based on the following criteria: 1. exact injury severity of the body regions according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (head, thorax, abdomen, extremities [including pelvis], and spine) and 2. level of the receiving hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 2,590 matched triplets could be defined. Traffic accidents were the main cause of severe injury in younger patients (child: 59.2%; adult: 57.9%). In contrast, low falls (from < 3 m) were the most frequent cause of accidents in the elderly group (47.2%). Elderly patients were least likely to be resuscitated at the scene. Both children and elderly patients received fewer therapeutic interventions on average than adults. More elderly patients died during the clinical course, and their outcome was worse overall, whereas the children had the lowest mortality rate.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, a large patient population was used to demonstrate that both elderly patients and children may have received less invasive treatment compared with adults who were injured with exactly the same severity (with the outcomes of these two groups being opposite to each other). Future studies and recommendations should urgently consider the different age groups.

The patient's voice matters: The impact of advance directives on elderly trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Geriatric trauma rates are increasing, yet trauma centers often struggle to provide autonomy regarding decision making to these patients. Advance care planning can assist with this process. Currently, there are limited data on the impact of advance directives (ADs) in elderly trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of preinjury AD in geriatric trauma patients and its impact on outcomes, with the hypothesis that ADs would not be associated with an increase in mortality.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review was conducted on patients older than 65 years with traumatic injury between 2017 and 2019. Three Level I trauma centers and one Level II trauma center were included. Exclusion criteria were readmission, burn injury, transfer to another facility, discharge from emergency department, and mortality prior to being admitted.

RESULTS

There were 6,135 patients identified; 751 (12.2%) had a preinjury AD. Patients in the AD+ group were older (86 vs. 77 years, p < 0.0001), more likely to be women (67.0% vs. 54.8%, p < 0.0001), and had more comorbidities. Hospital length of stay and ventilator days were similar. In-hospital mortality occurred in 236 patients, and 75.4% of them underwent withdrawal of care (WOC). The mortality rate was higher in AD+ group (10.5% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.0001). No difference was seen in the rate of AD between the WOC+ and WOC- group (31.5% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.251). A preinjury AD was identified as an independent predictor of mortality, but not a predictor of WOC.

CONCLUSION

Despite a high WOC rate in patients older than 65 years, most patients did not have an AD prior to injury. As the elderly trauma population grows, advance care planning should be better integrated into geriatric care to encourage a patient-centered approach to end-of-life care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological, level IV.

Comparison of Geriatric Versus Non-geriatric Trauma Patients With Palliative Care Consultations

BACKGROUND

Palliative care in trauma patients is still evolving. The goal was to compare characteristics, outcomes, triggers and timing for palliative care consultations (PCC) in geriatric (≥65 y.o.) and non-geriatric trauma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study included 432 patients from two level 1 trauma centers who received PCC between December 2012 and January 2019. Non-geriatric (n = 61) and geriatric (n = 371) groups were compared for: mechanism of injury (MOI), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, futile interventions (FI), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), ICU admissions, ICU and hospital lengths of stay (ICULOS; HLOS), timing to PCC, and mortality. Further propensity matching (PM) analysis compared 59 non-geriatric to 59 Geriatric patients matched by ISS, GCS, and DNR.

RESULTS

Geriatric patients were older (85.2 versus 49.7), with falls as predominant MOI. Non-geriatric patients comprised 14.1% of all patients with PCC and were more severely injured than Geriatrics: with statistically higher ISS (24.1 versus 18.5), lower RTS (5.4 versus 7.0), GCS (7.1 versus 11.5), with predominant MOI being traffic accidents, all P < 0.01. Non-Geriatrics had more ICU admissions (96.7% versus 88.1%), longer ICULOS (10.2 versus 4.7 days), DMV (11.1 versus 4.1 days), less DNR (57.4% versus 73.9%), higher in-hospital mortality (12.5% versus 2.6%), but double the time admission-PCC (11.3 versus 4.3 days) compared to Geriatrics, all P < 0.04. In PM comparison, despite same injury severity, Non-geriatrics had triple the time to PCC, five times the HLOS of geriatrics, and more FI (25.4% versus 3.4%), all P < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

PCC remains underutilized in non-geriatric trauma patients. Despite higher injury severity, non-geriatrics received more aggressive treatment, and had three times longer time to PCC, resulting in higher rate of FI than in Geriatrics.

The Documentation of Goals of Care Discussions at a Canadian Academic Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Patient-centered care is a core principle of the Canadian healthcare system. In order to facilitate patient-centered care, the documentation of a patient's medical goals and expectations is important, especially in the event of acute decompensation when an informed conversation with the patient may not be possible. The 'Goals of Care Discussion Form (GCF)' at Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC) documents goals of care discussions between patients and healthcare providers. All patients admitted to the Internal Medicine service are expected to have this form completed within 24 hours of admission. Formal measurement of form completion at our center has not previously been done, though anecdotally this form is often incomplete. The purpose of this study is to quantify the rate of completion and assess quality of documentation of the GCF at KHSC.

METHODS

This prospective chart review took place between August 25, 2018, and March 25, 2019. Charts were reviewed for the presence of a completed GCF, and the quality of notation was assessed, as appropriate. Given there are no existing tools for assessing the quality of a document such as the GCF, authors TC and JM created one de novo for this study. Extracted data included the amount of time elapsed between admission and completion of the GCF, whether the 'yes/no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)' order in the patient's chart aligned with their wishes as outlined on the GCF, and whether or not a patient's GCF was uploaded to the hospital's electronic medical record (EMR).

RESULTS

 Two hundred sixteen charts were reviewed. Of these, 136 (63.0%) had a complete GCF. The mean GCF quality score was 3.4/7 (95% CI [3.2, 3.6]). The mean time elapsed from admission to the completion of the GCF was 1.5 days (95% CI [0.6, 2.4]). There were 130 charts with both a complete GCF and a 'yes/no CPR' order, and of these, 20 (15.4%) showed a discrepancy. Eighty-six (63.2%) of the completed GCFs were uploaded to the EMR.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

 The rate of GCF completion at KHSC is noticeably higher than expected based on the previous literature. However, our assessment of the quality of completion indicates that there is room for improvement. Most concerning, discrepancies were found between the 'yes/no CPR' order in a patient's chart and their stated wishes on the GCF. Furthermore, less than two-thirds of completed GCFs were found to have been uploaded to the hospital's EMR. Given the emphasis on patient-centered care in the Canadian healthcare system, our findings suggest that improvement initiatives are needed with respect to documenting goals of care discussions with patients.

Palliative Care Consultations in Trauma Patients and Role of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Propensity-Matched Study

OBJECTIVE

To delineate characteristics of trauma patients associated with a palliative care consultation (PCC) and to analyze the role of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and related outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective study included 864 patients from 2 level one trauma centers admitted between 2012 and 2019.  Level 1 trauma centers are designated for admission of the most severe injured patients. Palliative care consultation group of 432 patients who received PCC and were compared to matched control (MC) group of 432 patients without PCC. Propensity matching covariates included Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, gender, and hospital length of stay (HLOS). Analysis included patient demographics, injury parameters, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU length of stay (ICULOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, timing of PCC and DNR, and mortality. Palliative care consultation patients were further analyzed based on DNR status: prehospital DNR, in-hospital DNR, and no DNR (NODNR).

RESULTS

Palliative care consultation compared to MC patients were older, predominantly Caucasian, with more frequent traumatic brain injury (TBI), ICU admissions, and mechanical ventilation. The average time to PCC was 5.3 days. Do-not-resuscitate orders were significantly more common in PCC compared to MC group (71.5% vs 11.1%, P < .001). Overall mortality was 90.7% in PCC and 6.0% in MC (P < .001). In patients with DNR, mortality was 94.2% in PCC and 18.8% in MC. In-hospital DNR-PCC compared to NODNR-PCC patients had shorter ICULOS (5.0 vs 7.3 days, P = .04), HLOS (6.2 vs 13.2 days, P = .006), and time to discharge (1.0 vs 6.3 days, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, DNR order, and TBI were associated with a PCC in trauma patients and resulted in significantly higher mortality in PCC than in MC patients. Combination of DNR and PCC was associated with shorter ICULOS, HLOS, and time from PCC to discharge.

Injured Older Adults Transported by Emergency Medical Services: One Year Outcomes by POLST Status

Background: Advance care planning documents, including Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), are intended to guide care near end of life, particularly in emergency situations. Yet, research on POLST during emergency care is sparse. Methods: A total of 7,055 injured patients age ≥ 65 years were transported by 8 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies to 23 hospitals in Oregon. We linked multiple data sources to EMS records, including: the Oregon POLST Registry, Medicare claims data, Oregon Trauma Registry, Oregon statewide inpatient data, and Oregon vital statistics records. We describe patient and event characteristics by POLST status at time of 9-1-1 contact, subsequent changes in POLST forms, and mortality to 12 months. Results: Of 7,055 injured older adults, 1,412 (20.0%) had a registered POLST form at the time of 911 contact. Among the 1,412 POLST forms, 390 (27.6%) specified full orders, 585 (41.4%) limited interventions, and 437 (30.9%) comfort measures only. By one year, 2,471 (35%) patients had completed POLST forms. Among the 4 groups (no POLST, POLST-full orders, POLST-limited intervention, POLST-comfort measures), Injury Severity Scores were similar. Mortality differences were present by 30 days (5.0%, 4.6%, 8.0%, and 13.3%, p < 0.01) and were greater by one year (19.5%, 23.9%, 35.4%, and 46.2%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Among injured older adults transported by ambulance in Oregon, one in 5 had an active POLST form at the time of 9-1-1 contact, the prevalence of which increased over the following year. Mortality differences by POLST status were evident at 30 days and large by one year. This information could help emergency, trauma, surgical, inpatient, and outpatient clinicians understand how to guide patients through acute injury episodes of care and post-injury follow up.

Advance Directive and Do-Not-Resuscitate Status among Advanced Cancer Patients with Acute Care Surgical Consultation

Formal communication of end-of-life preferences is crucial among patients with metastatic cancer. Our objective is to describe the prevalence of advance directives (AD) and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders among stage IV cancer patients with acute care surgery consultations, and the associated outcomes. This is a single institution retrospective review over an eight-year period. Two hundred and three patients were identified; mean age was 55.3 ± 11.4 years and 48.8 per cent were male. Fifty (24.6%) patients underwent exploratory surgery. Nineteen (10.6%) patients had another type of surgery. Twenty-one (10.3%) patients had a DNR order, and none had an AD on-admission. Fifty-four (26.6%) patients had a DNR order placed and four (2%) patients completed an AD postadmission. DNR postadmission was associated with the highest mortality at 42.6 per cent compared with 14.3 per cent for DNR on-admission and 1.56 per cent for full-code patients (P < 0.001). Compared with patients that remained full-code and those with DNR on-admission, DNR postadmission was associated with longer length of stay (19.6 days; P < 0.001) and ICU length of stay (7.72 days; P < 0.001). The prevalence of AD and DNR orders among stage IV cancer patients is low. The higher in-hospital mortality of patients with DNR postadmission reflects the use of DNR orders during clinical decline.