Risk of delayed intracranial haemorrhage after an initial negative CT in patients on DOACs with mild traumatic brain injury

Evidence-based indications for repeat head CT after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The effectiveness of routine repeat head computed tomography (CT) for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a subject of ongoing debate, with considerable variation in clinical practices. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the evidence comparing routine and selective repeat CT protocols for mTBI patients. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library for studies published in the last two decades. The studies included adult mTBI patients who underwent repeat head CT during their hospital stay. The primary outcome measured was the necessity for neurosurgical intervention, while secondary outcomes included radiological progression, neurological deterioration, and mortality rates. The analysis of 37 studies, encompassing 17,857 patients, revealed that the rates of neurosurgical intervention were similar for routine (2.8%, 95% CI: 1.9-3.7%) and selective CT protocols (3.2%, 95% CI: 2.1-4.3%; RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71-1.09, p = 0.24). Hemorrhage progression occurred in 7.63% of cases (95% CI: 7.24-8.03%), with comparable rates across both protocols (routine: 11.2% vs. selective: 9.8%, p = 0.29). Significant risk factors for clinical deterioration included an intracranial hemorrhage volume greater than 10 ml (OR 20.13, 95% CI: 5.67-71.44), the presence of multiple lesions (OR 11.03, 95% CI: 1.32-92.06), and temporal contusion (OR 5.73, 95% CI: 2.20-14.89). This meta-analysis indicates that selective CT protocols lead to similar clinical outcomes as routine scanning protocols in patients with mTBI. The overall low rate of neurosurgical intervention (2.05%) implies that close clinical observation and risk stratification may be as effective as universal repeat imaging. By implementing selective protocols based on identified risk factors, it may be possible to enhance patient safety while decreasing unnecessary imaging and healthcare costs. Further research should focus on validating risk-based protocols and determining the optimal timing for repeat imaging in patients at high risk.

Incidence and risk factors for delayed intracranial hemorrhage after mild brain injury in anticoagulated patients: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulated patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and a negative cerebral CT on admission, commonly undergo a repeated CT scan after observation in the emergency department (ED) to detect delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). However, the utility of this practice is controversial, with recent evidence suggesting that the risk of delayed ICH in these patients is low. This study aims to evaluate incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of delayed ICH in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) presenting to the ED with mTBI.

METHODS

A multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study was conducted in the EDs of three hospitals in Northern Italy, from January 2017 to December 2021. All consecutive adult patients on DOACs or VKAs therapy, admitted for a mTBI, who underwent a second CT scan after 12-24 h from a negative first one, were enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 1596 anticoagulated patients were enrolled, 869 (54%) on DOACs and 727 (46%) on VKAs therapy. The median age was 84 [79-88] and 56% of patients were females. The incidence of delayed ICH was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.1-3.0%; 14/869 patients) for DOACs, and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.6-4.1%; 19/727 patients) for VKAs patients, with no cases requiring neurosurgical intervention. Vomiting after head injury and the onset of new symptoms during observation were associated with a higher risk of delayed bleeding (OR 4.8; 95% CI: 1.4-16.5, and OR 4.7; 95% CI 1.2-23.7, respectively). At a 30-day follow-up, 2% of patients had a new ED admission related to their previous mTBI, with no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed ICH is uncommon among anticoagulated patients with mTBI and has minimal impact on their outcome. Routine performance of a second CT scan may be unnecessary and may be considered only in presence of high-risk clinical risk factors or signs of deterioration.

Economic Impact of Surveillance of Head Trauma Patients with Coagulopathy and Normal Initial Computed Tomography Scan (ECO-NCT)

INTRODUCTION

According to the Portuguese clinical guidelines published in 1999, patients with traumatic brain injury and coagulopathies should remain in-hospital for 24 hours for clinical and image surveillance, despite having an admission computed tomography (CT) scan showing no intracranial lesions. Growing evidence suggests this practice is not only void of clinical relevance, but that it can also be potentially harmful for the patient. Nevertheless, up until now there is no published data concerning the economic impact of this clinical practice.

METHODS

A cost analysis compared retrospective data from patients admitted to our emergency department during 2022 with a hypothetical scenario in which a patient with an admission CT scan without traumatic lesions was discharged. Clinical data was also retrieved concerning the rate of a delayed intracranial bleeding on 24-hour CT scan and mortality at a six-month-period after discharge. Direct costs for the national health service were determined in terms of funding and time invested by medical teams.

RESULTS

From a sample of 440 patients, 436 remained in-hospital for a 24-hour clinical and image surveillance, of which only two (0.5%) showed a new intracranial lesion on the second CT-scan. Neither of these two patients required therapeutic measures to control bleeding and were discharged 36 hours after admission. Out of 440 patients, one patient (0.2%) died of cardiac arrest during the 24-hour surveillance period, despite having an initial normal CT scan showing no brain lesions. Our current surveillance practice directly amounted to €163 157.00, whereas the cost of our hypothetical scenario amounted to €29 480.00: a difference of €133 677.00. The application of our surveillance guideline also meant that nine emergency shifts were devoted to this task, compared to 4.6 hypothetical shifts if patients were discharged after an initial CT scan without traumatic intracranial lesions.

CONCLUSION

In spite of apparently not adding any clinical value to our practice, our in-hospital surveillance may represent a significant financial and time-consuming burden, costing five times as much and demanding our medical teams twice as much work when compared to a scenario without clinical surveillance and 24-hour CT scans.

Low Incidence of Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Geriatric Emergency Department Patients on Preinjury Anticoagulation Presenting with Blunt Head Trauma

BACKGROUND

Delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after head injury in older patients taking anticoagulants has been reported to be as high as 7.2%. Other studies suggest much lower rates. Its incidence and clinical management are controversial, with some recommending observation and repeat head imaging at 24 h.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to assess the incidence of delayed ICH in geriatric Emergency Department (ED) head trauma patients prescribed preinjury anticoagulants.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study conducted at two hospital EDs from August 2019 to July 2020. All patients aged 65 years or older with acute head injury were eligible for enrollment. We conducted telephone follow-up at 14 and 60 days, and a chart review at 90 days. The primary study outcome was incidence of delayed ICH, which was defined as an initial negative head computed tomography scan followed by subsequent ICH believed to be caused by the initial traumatic event. We compared the rates of delayed ICH between patient cohorts based on anticoagulant use.

RESULTS

There were 3425 patients enrolled: 2300 (67.2%) were not on an anticoagulant, 249 (7%) were on preinjury warfarin, 780 (22.7%) were on a direct-acting oral anticoagulant, and 96 (2.8%) were on enoxaparin or heparin. The median age was 82 years (interquartile range 65-107), the majority were female (55.2%), and almost all were Caucasian (84.3%). An acute ICH was identified in 229 of 3425 (6.7%, 95% confidence interval 6-8%) and delayed ICH in 13 (0.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.6%). There were no differences in rates of delayed ICH between those who had been prescribed anticoagulants vs. those who had not (p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of delayed ICH is very low in older ED head trauma patients on prescribed pre-injury anticoagulants. Our data have important clinical implications for the management of blunt head trauma among older ED patients on anticoagulants.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Anticoagulated Head Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to provide a current and comprehensive analysis of the incidence of delayed intracerebral hemorrhage (dICH) in head trauma patients on oral anticoagulants (ACs) and to evaluate various potential risk factors.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies on dICH in anticoagulated head trauma patients undergoing repeat computed tomography scans. Studies reporting dICH incidence on repeat computed tomography within 24 hours of an initial negative scan were included. Data on demographics, AC type, risk factors, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

From 634 identified articles, 26 studies with 7218 patients were included. The overall incidence of dICH was 2.0%, with 43.8% of these cases requiring hospital admission or changes in clinical management. Only 0.1% required neurosurgical intervention, and 0.1% resulted in death. Meta-analysis of 20 studies revealed pooled dICH incidence per 1000 persons at risk was 27.1 for vitamin K antagonists and 20.5 for direct oral ACs. Significant risk factors for dICH included Glasgow Coma Scale <15, loss of consciousness, post-traumatic amnesia, and Abbreviated Injury Scale head ≥3.

CONCLUSIONS

A low incidence of dICH requires neurosurgical intervention; however, further studies are required to assess the need for other medical management in these patients. Furthermore, selective imaging for high-risk patients could improve care and resource allocation.

Incidence and outcomes of delayed intracranial hemorrhage: a population-based cohort study

Head trauma is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. Delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with minor head trauma is a major concern, but controversies exist regarding the incidence of delayed ICH and discharge planning at the ED. This study aimed to determine the incidence of delayed ICH in adults who developed ICH after a negative initial brain computed tomography (CT) at the ED and investigate the clinical outcomes for delayed ICH. This nationwide population cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea from 2013 to 2019. Adult patients who presented to an ED due to trauma and were discharged after a negative brain CT examination were selected. The main outcomes were the incidence of ICH within 14 days after a negative brain CT at initial ED visit and the clinical outcomes of patients with and without delayed ICH. The study patients were followed up to 1 year after the initial ED discharge. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio for all-cause 1-year mortality of delayed ICH. During the 7-year study period, we identified 626,695 adult patients aged 20 years or older who underwent brain CT at the ED due to minor head trauma, and 2666 (0.4%) were diagnosed with delayed ICH within 14 days after the first visit. Approximately two-thirds of patients (64.3%) were diagnosed with delayed ICH within 3 days, and 84.5% were diagnosed within 7 days. Among the patients with delayed ICH, 71 (2.7%) underwent neurosurgical intervention. After adjustment for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and insurance type, delayed ICH (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-2.48; p < 0.001) was significantly associated with 1-year mortality. The incidence of delayed ICH was 0.4% in the general population, with the majority diagnosed within 7 days. These findings suggest that patient discharge education for close observation for a week may be a feasible strategy for the general population.

Incidence of intracranial bleeding in mild traumatic brain injury patients taking oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. Most TBI cases occur in older people, because they are at a higher risk of accidental falling. As the population ages, the use of anticoagulants is increasing. Some serious complications of TBI, such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), may occur even in mild cases. According to the current guidelines regarding managing mild TBI patients, a CT head scan is recommended for all patients receiving anticoagulation. We aim to assess the incidence of ICH in patients with mild TBI taking oral anticoagulants.

METHODS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024503086). Twenty-eight studies evaluating patients with a mild TBI from ten countries with a total sample size of 11,172, 5671 on DOACs, and 5501 on VKAs were included in our meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The random-effects overall incidence of ICH among oral anticoagulated patients with mild TBI was calculated to be 9.4% [95% CI 7.2-12.1%, I2 = 89%]. The rates of immediate ICH for patients taking DOACs and VKAs were 6.4% and 10.5%, respectively. The overall rate of immediate ICH in anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 8.5% [95% CI 6.6-10.9%], with a high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 88%). Furthermore, the rates of delayed ICH in patients with mild TBI taking DOACs and VKAs were 1.6% and 1.9%, respectively. The overall incidence of delayed ICH among oral anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 1.7% [95% CI 1-2.8%, I2 = 79%]. The overall rate of ICH among mild TBI patients taking DOAC was calculated to be 7.3% [95% CI 5.2-10.3%], with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 79%). However, the overall ICH rate is higher in patients who take only VKAs 11.3% [95% CI 8.6-14.7%, I2 = 83%]. Patients on DOACs were at lower risk of ICH after mild TBI compared to patients on VKAs (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, p < 0.01, I2 = 28%).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis confirms the need for performing brain CT scan in patients with mild TBI patients who receive oral anticoagulants before injury. Due to limited data, further multi-center, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the true incidence of traumatic ICH in patients on anticoagulants.

A Narrative Review on Financial Challenges and Health Care Costs Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a highly prevalent and potentially severe medical condition. Challenges regarding TBI management are related to accurate diagnostics, defining its severity, and establishing prompt interventions to affect outcomes. Among the health care components in the TBI handling strategy is intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, which is fundamental to therapy decisions. However, ICP monitoring is an Achilles tendon, imposing a significant financial burden on health care systems, particularly in middle and low-income communities. This article arises from the understanding from the authors that there is insufficient scientific evidence about the potential economic impacts from the use of noninvasive technologies in the monitoring of TBI. Based on personal experience, as well as from reading other, clinically focused studies, the thesis is that the use of such technologies could greatly affect the health care system and this article seeks to address this lack of literature, show ways in which such systems could be evaluated, and show estimations of possible results from these investigations.

OBJECTIVE

This review primarily investigates the economic burden of TBI and whether new technologies are suitable to reduce its health care costs without compromising the quality of care, according to the levels of evidence available. The objective is to stimulate more research and attention in the area.

METHODS

For this narrative review, a PubMed search was conducted for articles discussing TBI health care costs, as well as monitoring technologies (tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, optic nerve sheath diameter, transcranial Doppler, pupillometry, and noninvasive ICP waveform) and their application in managing TBI. Strategies were first evaluated from a medical noninferiority perspective before calculating the average savings of each selected strategy. All applicable studies were analyzed for quality using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Statement117 and this article was written to conform as much as possible with it.

RESULTS

The review included 109 references and showed a consistent potential in noninvasive technologies to reduce costs and maintain or improve the quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

TBI prevalence has increased with a disproportionate health care burden in the last decades. Noninvasive monitoring techniques seem to be effective in reducing TBI health care costs, with few limitations, especially the need for more supporting scientific evidence. The undeniable clinical and financial potential of these techniques is compelling to further investigate their role in TBI management, as well as the creation of more comprehensive monitoring models to the understanding of complex phenomena occurring in the injured brain.

Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients under Anticoagulant Therapy: Review of Management in Emergency Department

The best management of patients who suffer from traumatic brain injury (TBI) while on oral anticoagulants is one of the most disputed problems of emergency services. Indeed, guidelines, clinical decision rules, and observational studies addressing this topic are scarce and conflicting. Moreover, relevant issues such as the specific treatment (and even definition) of mild TBI, rate of delayed intracranial injury, indications for neurosurgery, and anticoagulant modulation are largely empiric. We reviewed the most recent evidence on these topics and explored other clinically relevant aspects, such as the promising role of dosing brain biomarkers, the strategies to assess the extent of anticoagulation, and the indications of reversals and tranexamic acid administration, in cases of mild TBI or as a bridge to neurosurgery. The appropriate timing of anticoagulant resumption was also discussed. Finally, we obtained an insight into the economic burden of TBI in patients on oral anticoagulants, and future directions on the management of this subpopulation of TBI patients were proposed. In this article, at the end of each section, a "take home message" is stated.

Minor head injury in anticoagulated patients: Outcomes and analysis of clinical predictors. A prospective study

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients taking oral anticoagulants who experience minor head injury (MHI) is unclear. The availability of validated protocols and reliable predictors of prognosis would be of great benefit. We investigated clinical factors as predictors of clinical outcomes and intracranial injury (ICI).

METHODS

We conducted a single-cohort, prospective, observational study in an ED. Our structured clinical pathway included a first head CT scan, 24 h observation and a second CT scan. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MHI-related death or re-admission to ED at day +30. The secondary outcome was the rate of delayed ICI (dICI), defined as second positive CT scan after a first negative CT scan. We assessed some clinical predictors derived from guidelines and clinical prediction rules as potential risk factors for the outcomes.

RESULTS

450 patients with a negative first CT scan who underwent a second CT scan composed our 'study population'. The rate of the primary outcome was 4%. The rate of the secondary outcome was 4.7%. Upon univariate and multivariate analysis no statistically significant predictors for the outcomes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous retrospective studies showed a lot of negative predictive factors for anticoagulated patients suffering a minor head injury. In our prospective study no clinical factors emerged as predictors of poor clinical outcomes and dICI. So, even if we confirmed a low rate of adverse outcomes, the best management of these patients in ED remains not so clear and future trials are needed.

Minimal is not minor also in patients with mild traumatic brain injury on oral direct anticoagulant therapy

Currently, all patients, regardless of the type of head injury, should undergo a head computerized tomography (CT) if on oral anticoagulant therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the different incidences of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between patients with minor head injury (mHI) and patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and whether there were differences in the risk of death at 30 days as a result of trauma or neurosurgery. A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted from January 1, 2016, to February 1, 2020. All patients on DOACs therapy who suffered head trauma and underwent a head CT were extracted from the computerized databases. Patients were divided into two groups MTBI vs mHI all in DOACs treatment. Whether a difference in the incidence of post-traumatic ICH was present was investigated, and pre- and post-traumatic risk factors were compared between the two groups to assess the possible association with ICH risk by propensity score matching. 1425 with an MTBI in DOACs were enrolled. Of these, 80.1% (1141/1425) had an mHI and 19.9% (284/1425) had an MTBI. Of these, 16.5% (47/284) patients with MTBI and 3.3% (38/1141) with mHI reported post-traumatic ICH. After propensity score matching, ICH was consistently found to be more associated with patients with MTBI than with mHI (12.5% vs 5.4%, p = 0.027). Risk factors associated with immediate ICH in mHI patients were high energy impact, previous neurosurgery, trauma above the clavicles, post-traumatic vomiting and headache. Patients on MTBI (5.4%) were found to be more associated with ICH than those with mHI (0.0%, p = 0.002). also when the need for neurosurgery or death within 30 days were considered. Patients on DOACs with mHI have a lower risk of presenting with post-traumatic ICH than patients with MTBI. Furthermore, patients with mHI have a lower risk of death or neurosurgery than patients with MTBI, despite the presence of ICH.

Conventional MR Imaging in Trauma Management in Adults

MR imaging has been shown to have higher sensitivity than computed tomography (CT) for traumatic intracranial soft tissue injuries as well as most cases of intracranial hemorrhage, thus making it a significant adjunct to CT in the management of traumatic brain injury, mostly in the subacute to chronic phase, but may also be of use in the acute phase, when there are persistent neurologic symptoms unexplained by prior imaging.

Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Approved by ACEP Board of Directors, February 1, 2023 Clinical Policy Endorsed by the Emergency Nurses Association (April 5, 2023)

This 2023 Clinical Policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is an update of the 2008 “Clinical Policy: Neuroimaging and Decisionmaking in Adult Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Setting.” A writing subcommittee conducted a systematic review of the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to answer the following questions: 1) In the adult emergency department patient presenting with minor head injury, are there clinical decision tools to identify patients who do not require a head computed tomography? 2) In the adult emergency department patient presenting with minor head injury, a normal baseline neurologic examination, and taking an anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication, is discharge safe after a single head computed tomography? and 3) In the adult emergency department patient diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury or concussion, are there clinical decision tools or factors to identify patients requiring follow-up care for postconcussive syndrome or to identify patients with delayed sequelae after emergency department discharge? Evidence was graded and recommendations were made based on the strength of the available data. Widespread and consistent implementation of evidence-based clinical recommendations is warranted to improve patient care.

Clinical assessment of head injuries in motorcyclists involved in traffic accidents: A prospective, observational study

OBJECTIVE

to review the clinical assessment of head injuries in motorcyclists involved in traffic accidents.

METHOD

prospective observational study, including adult motorcyclists involved in traffic accidents in a period of 12 months. Patients sustaining signs of intoxication were excluded. A modification of the Canadian Head CT Rules was used to indicate computed tomography (CT). Patients not undergoing CT were followed by phone calls for three months. Collected variables were compared between the group sustaining head injuries and the others. We used chi-square, Fisher, and Student's t for statistical analysis, considering p<0.05 as significant.

RESULTS

we included 208 patients, 99.0% were wearing helmets. Seventeen sustained signs of intoxication and were excluded. Ninety (47.1%) underwent CT and 12 (6.3%) sustained head injuries. Head injuries were significantly associated with Glasgow Coma Scale<15 (52.3% vs. 2.8% - p<0,001) and a positive physical exam (17.1% vs. zero - p<0,05). Four (2.1%) patients with intracranial mass lesions needed surgical interventions. None helmet-wearing patients admitted with GCS=15 and normal physical examination sustained head injuries.

CONCLUSION

Head CT is not necessary for helmet-wearing motorcyclists admitted with GCS=15 and normal physical examination.

Investigação da presença de lesões traumáticas em segmento cefálico em motociclistas vítimas de acidentes de tráfego: Estudo observacional prospectivo

RESUMO Objetivo: análise crítica da investigação diagnóstica de lesões em segmento cefálico de motociclistas vítimas de acidentes de tráfego. Método: estudo observacional prospectivo incluindo motociclistas adultos vítimas de trauma, sem intoxicação exógena, em um período de 12 meses. A tomografia de crânio (TC) foi indicada de acordo com uma modificação dos “critérios canadenses”. Os pacientes que não foram submetidos a TC de crânio tiveram acompanhamento telefônico por três meses. A presença de lesões foi correlacionada com as varáveis coletadas através dos testes Qui-quadrado, t de Student ou Fisher, considerando p<0,05 como significativo. Resultados: dos 208 inicialmente incluídos, 206 (99,0%) estavam usando capacete. Dezessete estavam com sinais de intoxicação exógena e foram excluídos, restando 191 para análise. Noventa pacientes (47,1%) realizaram TC e 12 (6,3%) apresentaram lesões craniencefálicas, que se associaram significativamente a Escala de Coma de Glasgow (ECG) <15 (52,3% vs. 2,8% - p<0,001) e alterações ao exame físico da região cefálica/neurológico (17,1% vs. zero - p<0,05). Quatro pacientes (2,1%) precisaram tratamento cirúrgico de lesões intracranianas. Nenhum dos pacientes admitidos com ECG 15, em uso de capacete e sem alterações no exame físico apresentou TC alterada. Conclusões: para pacientes admitidos com ECG 15, que utilizavam o capacete no acidente e não apresentavam quaisquer alterações no exame físico, a realização da TC de crânio não trouxe mudanças no atendimento ao paciente. .