Moraxella atlantae keratitis presenting with an infectious ring ulcer

Differentiation of acanthamoeba keratitis from other non-acanthamoeba keratitis: Risk factors and clinical features

INTRODUCTION

Infectious Keratitis is one of the most common ocular emergencies seen by ophthalmologists. Our aim is to identify the risk factors and clinical features of Acanthamoeba Keratitis (AK).

METHODS

This retrospective chart review study was conducted at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and included all the microbial keratitis cases, male and female patients of all ages. The main outcome is the differentiation between various microbial keratitis types.

RESULTS

We included 134 consecutive eyes of 126 persons. We had 24 cases of acanthamoeba keratitis, 22 bacterial keratitis, 24 fungal keratitis, 32 herpetic keratitis, and 32 bacterial co-infection. Contact lens wear was found in 33 eyes (24.6%). Among acanthamoeba keratitis patients, 73% were ≤ 39 years of age, and 73% were females (P <0.001). Also, in AK cases, epithelial defect was found in all cases (100%), endothelial plaques were found in 18 eyes (69.2%), 12 cases had radial keratoneuritis (46.2%), and ring infiltrate was found in 53.8% of AK cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined the factors that increase the risk of acanthamoeba infection and the clinical characteristics that help distinguish it from other types of microbial keratitis. Our findings suggest that younger females and patients who wear contact lenses are more likely to develop acanthamoeba keratitis. The occurrence of epitheliopathy, ring infiltrate, radial keratoneuritis, and endothelial plaques indicate the possibility of acanthamoeba infection. Promoting education on wearing contact lenses is essential to reduce the risk of acanthamoeba infection, as it is the most significant risk factor for this infection.

Corneal ring infiltrate- far more than Acanthamoeba keratitis: review of pathophysiology, morphology, differential diagnosis and management

OBJECTIVE

Ring infiltrates usually accompany numerous infectious and sterile ocular disorders. Nevertheless, systemic conditions, drugs toxicity and contact lens wear may present with corneal ring infiltrate in substantial part. Considering its detrimental effect on vision, detailed knowledge on etiology, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and management should be considered essential for every ophthalmologist.

METHODS

The PUBMED database was searched for "corneal ring infiltrate" and "ring infiltrate" phrases, "sterile corneal infiltrate" and "corneal infiltrate". We analyzed articles written in English on risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, morphological features, ancillary tests (anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, corneal scraping, in vivo confocal microscopy), differential diagnosis and management of corneal ring infiltrate.

RESULTS

Available literature depicts multifactorial origin of corneal ring infiltrate. Dual immunological pathophysiology, involving both antibodies-dependent and -independent complement activation, is underlined. Furthermore, we found that the worldwide most prevalent among non-infectious and infectious ring infiltrates are ring infiltrates related to contact-lens wear and bacterial keratitis respectively. Despite low incidence of Acanthamoeba keratitis, it manifests with corneal ring infiltrate with the highest proportion of the affected patients (one third). However, similar ring infiltrate might appear as a first sign of general diseases manifestation and require targeted treatment. Every corneal ring infiltrate with compromised epithelium should be scraped and treat as an infectious infiltrate until not proven otherwise. Of note, microbiological ulcer might also lead to immunological ring and therefore require anti-inflammatory treatment.

CONCLUSION

Corneal ring infiltrate might be triggered not only by ocular infectious and non-infectious factors, but also by systemic conditions. Clinical assessment is crucial for empirical diagnosis. Furthermore, treatment is targeted towards the underlying condition but should begin with anti-infectious regimen until not proven otherwise.

Can Serum Drops Containing Doxycycline Provide a Supplemental Anti-Bacterial Effect in the Treatment of Bacterial Keratitis?

PURPOSE

Systemic doxycycline has been prescribed to reduce inflammation and enhance corneal healing in bacterial keratitis. Topical autologous serum drops (ASD) containing doxycycline following oral supplementation may additionally confer an anti-bacterial effect. The potential of this supplementation was evaluated by determining the in vitro susceptibility of bacterial keratitis isolates to doxycycline.

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of doxycycline against 100 bacterial keratitis isolates were determined using Etests. Twenty-seven Staphylococcus aureus, ten coagulase-negative Staphylococci, six Streptococcus pneumoniae, seven viridans group streptococci, seven other Gram-positive bacteria, nineteen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, eight Serratia marcescens, four Moraxella spp., two Haemophilus spp., and ten other Gram-negative bacteria isolates were tested. MICs of doxycycline were compared to a serum standard concentration of doxycycline (SSCD) of 4 µg/mL and concentrations that would be found in 50% and 20% serum component clinical preparations of ASD, corresponding to 50% SSCD (2 µg/mL) and 20% SSCD (0.8 µg/mL), respectively. MICs equal to or less than these values were used to deem a bacterial isolate susceptible.

RESULTS

For Gram-positive bacteria, susceptibilities to SSCD, 50% SSCD, and 20% SSCD were 86%, 65%, and 60%, respectively. For Gram-negative bacteria, susceptibilities to SSCD, 50% SSCD, and 20% SSCD were 37.2%, 23.3%, and 11.6%, respectively. Chi-squared analyses comparing Gram-positive and Gram-negative susceptibilities showed significantly greater susceptibility of Gram-positive bacteria at all three tested MICs (<0.0001, <0.0001, <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that autologous serum drops containing theoretic concentrations of doxycycline may provide an additional anti-bacterial effect in the treatment of bacterial keratitis, especially for Gram-positive bacterial keratitis compared to Gram-negative bacterial keratitis.

Modern Technologies in Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis (Review)

Traumas and infectious diseases of the eye play a leading role in the development of corneal blindness responsible for 1.5-2 million cases of vision loss per year. To date, the issue of reducing the incidence of fungal keratitis is acute and needs to be solved worldwide. Trauma as a risk factor for corneal fungal disease is thought to be prevalent in developing countries due to agricultural involvement, while in developed countries the onset of the disease is predisposed by medical advances such as contact vision correction and modern ophthalmic surgery. Thorough analysis of the pathogenesis gives the possibility to describe the action of fungal enzymes, biofilm formation, and the resistance mechanism, which on the one hand explains the aggressive course of the disease and difficulties in its diagnosis, and on the other hand, it encourages searching for new methods of diagnosis and treatment. The non-specific clinical picture of fungal keratitis, the variety and availability of antibiotics nowadays become an obstacle for rapid detection of this pathology. Low public awareness and late visit to an ophthalmologist are also a barrier to successful combating the increasing incidence of fungal keratitis. Belated diagnosis, increasing resistance of fungi to antibiotics, and lack of registered antifungal ophthalmic drugs justify poor treatment efficacy resulting in decreased visual acuity or vision loss. Existing diagnostic methods need systematization and detailed comparison, identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each. This review considers causative agents and their influence on pathogenesis of the disease, describes difficulties of fungal keratitis diagnosis and possible ways of overcoming these problems using new developments, and also outlines further prospects of research in this direction.

Wessely corneal ring phenomenon: An unsolved pathophysiological dilemma

The cornea is a densely innervated, avascular tissue showing exceptional inflammatory and immune responses. The cornea is a site of lymphangiogenic and angiogenic privilege devoid of blood and lymphatic vessels that limits the entry of inflammatory cells from the adjacent and highly immunoreactive conjunctiva. Immunological and anatomical differences between the central and peripheral cornea are also necessary to sustain passive immune privilege. The lower density of antigen-presenting cells in the central cornea and the 5:1 peripheral-to-central corneal ratio of C1 are 2 main features conferring passive immune privilege. C1 activates the complement system by antigen-antibody complexes more effectively in the peripheral cornea and, thus, protects the central corneas' transparency from immune-driven and inflammatory reactions. Wessely rings, also known as corneal immune rings, are non-infectious ring-shaped stromal infiltrates usually formed in the peripheral cornea. They result from a hypersensitivity reaction to foreign antigens, including those of microorganism origin. Thus, they are thought to be composed of inflammatory cells and antigen-antibody complexes. Corneal immune rings have been associated with various infectious and non-infectious causes, including foreign bodies, contact lens wear, refractive procedures, and drugs. We describe the anatomical and immunologic basis underlying Wessely ring formation, its causes, clinical presentation, and management.

Enhanced immune responses to vaccine antigens in the corneal stroma

To examine the widely accepted dogma that the eye is an immune-privileged organ that can suppress antigen immunogenicity, we explored systemic immune responses to a model vaccine antigen (tetanus toxoid) delivered to six compartments of the rodent eye (ocular surface, corneal stroma, anterior chamber, subconjunctival space, suprachoroidal space, vitreous body). We discovered that antigens delivered to corneal stroma induced enhanced, rather than suppressed, antigen-specific immune responses, which were 18- to 30-fold greater than conventional intramuscular injection and comparable to intramuscular vaccination with alum adjuvant. Systemic immune responses to antigen delivered to the other ocular compartments were much weaker. The enhanced systemic immune responses after intrastromal injection were related to a sequence of events involving the formation of an antigen "depot" in the avascular stroma, infiltration of antigen-presenting cells, up-regulation of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules CD80/CD86, and induction of lymphangiogenesis in the corneal stroma facilitating sustained presentation of antigen to the lymphatic system. These enhanced immune responses in corneal stroma suggest new approaches to medical interventions for ocular immune diseases and vaccination methods.

Defining and Diagnosing Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis

Pinkeye and infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) are imprecise terms that describe diverse ocular diseases. Moraxella bovis is the major causative agent of IBK; however, disease epidemiology is not fully known. Not all cases referred to as pinkeye are of infectious origin, and not all IBK involve M bovis. This article suggests the term pinkeye should no longer be used, offers a case definition for IBK (a herd disease), and suggests describing ocular signs of IBK using existing clinical descriptors rather than resorting to novel scores. A new term "ocular moraxellosis" is defined as IBK from which Moraxella spp are demonstrated.

Recalcitrant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Keratitis with Hyphaema

Purpose

To report a case of recalcitrant pseudomonas keratitis with a rare presentation of hyphaema.

Observation

A 45-year-old female was noted to have contact lens-related pseudomonas keratitis with hyphaema. The organism was refractory to multiple antibiotics and only responded to Tazocin eye drops.

Conclusion and Importance

Hyphaema is a rare presentation in bacterial keratitis and could represent infection with an especially virulent organism. Use of Aspirin could precipitate hyphaema in infective keratitis. Alternative antibiotic choices such as Tazocin, colistin, meropenem, and imipenem can be considered when standard therapy is ineffective for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas keratitis.

Moraxella species: infectious microbes identified by use of time-of-flight mass spectrometry

PURPOSE

To report the clinical manifestations, identification, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes of ocular infections caused by Moraxella species.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of all patients treated at the Departments of Ophthalmology of the Ogaki Municipal Hospital and the Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine for ocular infections caused by Moraxella species between January 2011 and June 2017 were examined. The stored Moraxella species isolated from ocular samples were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), molecular identification, and the biochemical properties.

RESULTS

Sixteen eyes of 16 patients were treated for Moraxella ocular infections. The patients' median age was 72 years. A predisposing systemic or ocular condition was identified in 15 of the patients. Nine of the patients developed keratitis; four, conjunctivitis; and three, blebitis. M lacunata (6 eyes), M catarrhalis (6), M nonliquefaciens (3), and M osloensis (1) were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. All isolates were sensitive to levofloxacin, tobramycin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefazolin. Twelve patients with keratitis or blebitis were treated with various topical antimicrobial combinations, and systemic antibiotics were used in 10 of the 12 patients. The mean time for the complete closure of the epithelial defects with keratitis was 24 days. The visual outcomes after treatment were favorable except in 1 keratitis patient who underwent enucleation.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of duo-therapy with a combination of fluoroquinolone and cefmenoxime should be considered in cases nonresponsive to monotherapy, such as keratitis and bleb-associated infections. MALDI-TOF MS is useful for the identification of Moraxella to the species level.