Delivery planning for pregnancies with gastroschisis: findings from a prospective national registry

Preterm vs term delivery in antenatally diagnosed gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence regarding gestational age at birth, length of stay, sepsis incidence, days on mechanical ventilation, and mortality between preterm and term deliveries in pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted database searches of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov without language restrictions through August 16, 2021. References of all relevant articles were reviewed.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, and observational studies were evaluated comparing length of stay, sepsis, days on mechanical ventilation, and mortality between either elective preterm delivery and expectant management (Group 1) or preterm gestational age and term gestational age (Group 2).

METHODS

Two researchers independently selected studies and evaluated risk of bias with the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Mean differences and odds ratios were calculated using a random-effects model for inclusion and methodological quality. The primary outcome was length of stay. Secondary outcomes were incidence of sepsis, mortality, days on mechanical ventilation, and gestational age.

RESULTS

Thirty studies with a total of 7409 patients were included in the systematic review, of which 25 were included in the analysis. Group 1 studies found no difference in length of stay or mortality and a trend toward fewer days on mechanical ventilation (mean difference, -0.40; 95% confidence interval, -0.89 to -0.10; P=.12; I²=35%). Subgroup analysis excluding premature delivery demonstrated lower sepsis incidence in elective preterm delivery (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.84; P=.01; I²=0%). Group 2 studies found increased length of stay (mean difference, 15.44; 95% confidence interval, 8.44-21.83; P<.00001; I²=94%), sepsis (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.50; P=.008; I²=51%), days on mechanical ventilation (mean difference, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-2.66; P=.03; I²=66%), and mortality (odds ratio, 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-5.55; P=.0007; I²=0%). Gestational age was significantly lower in Group 2 studies than in Group 1 studies.

CONCLUSION

Data continue to be conflicting, but subgroup analysis suggested a possible reduction in sepsis incidence and mean days on mechanical ventilation with elective early term delivery.

Outcome and management in neonates with gastroschisis in the third millennium-a single-centre observational study

Gastroschisis is one of the most common congenital malformations in paediatric surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal management. The aims of this study were to investigate the management and outcome and to identify predictors of outcome in gastroschisis. A retrospective observational study of neonates with gastroschisis born between 1999 and 2020 was undertaken. Data was extracted from the medical records and Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of outcome measured by length of hospital stay (LOS) and duration of parenteral nutrition (PN). In total, 114 patients were included. Caesarean section was performed in 105 (92.1%) at a median gestational age (GA) of 36 weeks (range 29-38) whereof (46) 43.8% were urgent. Primary closure was achieved in 82% of the neonates. Overall survival was 98.2%. One of the deaths was caused by abdominal compartment syndrome and one patient with intestinal failure-associated liver disease died from sepsis. None of the deceased patients was born after 2005. Median time on mechanical ventilation was 22 h. Low GA, staged closure, intestinal atresia, and sepsis were independent predictors of longer LOS and duration on PN. In addition, male sex was an independent predictor of longer LOS.

CONCLUSION

Management of gastroschisis according to our protocol was successful with a high survival rate, no deaths in neonates born after 2005, and favourable results in LOS, duration on PN, and time on mechanical ventilation compared to other reports. Multicentre registry with long-term follow-up is required to establish the best management of gastroschisis.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Gastroschisis is one of the most common congenital malformations in paediatric surgery with increasing incidence. • There is no consensus among clinicians regarding the optimal management of gastroschisis.

WHAT IS NEW

• Although primary closure was achieved in 82% of the patients, mortality rate was very low (1.8%) with no deaths in neonates born after 2005 following the introduction of measurement of intraabdominal pressure at closure. • Low gestational age, staged closure, intestinal atresia, sepsis, and male sex were independent predictors of longer length of hospital stay.

The medical and surgical management of gastroschisis

Gastroschisis (GS) is a full-thickness abdominal wall defect in which fetal intestine herniates alongside the umbilical cord into the intrauterine cavity, resulting in an intestinal injury of variable severity. An increased prevalence of gastroschisis has been observed across several continents and is a focus of epidemiologic study. Prenatal diagnosis of GS is common and allows for delivery planning and treatment in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) by collaborative interdisciplinary teams (neonatology, neonatal nursing and pediatric surgery). Postnatal treatment focuses on closure of the defect, optimized nutrition, complication avoidance and a timely transition to enteral feeding. Babies born with complex GS are more vulnerable to complications, have longer and more resource intensive hospital stays and benefit from standardized care pathways provided by teams with expertise in managing infants with intestinal failure. This article will review the current state of knowledge related to the medical and surgical management and outcomes of gastroschisis with a special focus on the role of the neonatologist in supporting integrated team-based care.

Sutureless closure for the management of gastroschisis

Gastroschisis is a common congenital anomaly in which the midgut fails to return to the abdominal cavity resulting in exposed intestines, which are not covered by a membrane in a neonate. The incidence of gastroschisis has been increasing worldwide resulting in an evolving medical and surgical management. Gastroschisis can be either simple or complicated. Complicated gastroschisis occurs when gastroschisis is associated with gastrointestinal conditions such as intestinal atresia, volvulus, stenosis or perforation. In this instance, the mortality and morbidity of patients significantly increases. Initial management of gastroschisis requires a multi-modal, interdisciplinary approach in order to successfully care for a neonate. Patients should be managed in a neonatal intensive care unit under the care of intensivists, respiratory therapists and pediatric surgeons. Temperature regulation, hydration and protection of the bowel are of the utmost priorities. Surgical management of gastroschisis focuses on reduction of the bowel and closure of the abdominal wall defect. Initially, the defect was closed primarily with suture, however, more recently, a sutureless closure has become prevalent. This, in conjunction with use of a silo, has led to a shift from the operating room and general anesthesia to the bedside. This article aims to discuss the presentation, diagnosis and management of gastroschisis.

Accuracy of Ultrasound to Predict Neonatal Birth Weight Among Fetuses With Gastroschisis: Impact on Timing of Delivery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight among fetuses with gastroschisis and how the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) affects the timing of delivery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including all fetuses with a diagnosis of gastroschisis at our institution from November 2012 through October 2017. We excluded multiple gestations, pregnancies with major structural or chromosomal abnormalities, and those for which prenatal and postnatal follow-up were unavailable. Performance characteristics of ultrasound to predict being small for gestational age (SGA) were calculated for the first and last ultrasound estimations of fetal weight.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 75 cases of gastroschisis. At the initial ultrasound estimation, 15 of 58 (25.9%) fetuses met criteria for FGR; 48 of 70 (68.6%) met criteria at the time of the last ultrasound estimation (median, 34.7 weeks). Cesarean delivery was performed for 37 of 75 (49.3%), with FGR and concern for fetal distress as the indication for delivery in 17 of 37 (45.9%). Only 6 of 17 (35.3%) of the neonates born by cesarean delivery for an indication of FGR and fetal distress were SGA. The initial ultrasound designation of FGR corresponded to SGA at birth in 8 of 15 (53.3%), whereas the last ultrasound estimation corresponded to SGA in 17 of 48 (35.4%). The initial ultrasound estimation agreed with the last ultrasound estimation before delivery with the diagnosis of FGR in 13 of 15 (86.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound in the third trimester was sensitive but had a low positive predictive value and low accuracy for the diagnosis of SGA at birth for fetuses with gastroschisis. A large proportion of fetuses were born by cesarean delivery with indications related to FGR or fetal concerns.

Development of a prenatal clinical care pathway for uncomplicated gastroschisis and literature review

BACKGROUND

Gastroschisis is an abdominal wall defect wherein the bowel is herniated into the amniotic fluid. Controversy exists regarding optimal prenatal surveillance strategies that predict fetal well-being and help guide timing of delivery. Our objective was to develop a clinical care pathway for prenatal management of uncomplicated gastroschisis at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a review of literature from January 1996 to May 2017 to evaluate prenatal ultrasound (US) markers and surveillance strategies that help determine timing of delivery and optimize outcomes in fetal gastroschisis.

RESULTS

A total 63 relevant articles were identified. We found that among the US markers, intraabdominal bowel dilatation, polyhydramnios, and gastric dilatation are potentially associated with postnatal complications. Prenatal surveillance strategy with monthly US starting at 28weeks of gestational age (wGA) and twice weekly non-stress testing beginning at 32wGA is recommended to optimize fetal wellbeing. Timing of delivery should be based on obstetric indications and elective preterm delivery prior to 37wGA is not indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

Close prenatal surveillance of fetal gastroschisis is necessary due to the high risk for adverse outcomes including intrauterine fetal demise in the third trimester. Decisions regarding the timing of delivery should take into consideration the additional prematurity-associated morbidity.

Factors that Influence Longitudinal Growth from Birth to 18 Months of Age in Infants with Gastroschisis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate factors that influence growth in infants with gastroschisis.

STUDY DESIGN

Growth parameters at birth, discharge, 6, 12, and 18 months of age were collected from 42 infants with gastroschisis.

RESULTS

The mean z-scores for weight, length, and head circumference were below normal at birth and decreased between birth and discharge. Lower gestational age correlated with a worsening change in weight z-score from birth to discharge (rho 0.38, p = 0.01), but not with the change in weight z-score from discharge to 18 months (rho 0.04, p = 0.81). There was no correlation between the day of life when the enteral feeds were started and the change in weight z-score from birth to discharge (rho 0.12, p = 0.44) or discharge to 18 months (rho -0.15, p = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that infants with gastroschisis experience a significant decline in weight z-score between birth and discharge, and start to catch up on all growth parameters after discharge. Prematurity in gastroschisis infants is associated with a greater risk for weight loss during this time. This information emphasizes the importance of minimizing weight loss prior to discharge in premature infants with gastroschisis and highlights the need for optimal management strategies for these infants.

A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour

BACKGROUND

The proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has risen in recent decades, with significant variation within countries and between hospitals. The aim of this study was to review research supporting indications for IOL and determine which indications are supported by evidence and where knowledge gaps exist.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review of quantitative studies of common indications for IOL. For each indication, we included systematic reviews/meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case control studies that compared maternal and neonatal outcomes for different modes or timing of birth. Studies were identified via the databases PubMed, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from between April 2008 and November 2019, and also from reference lists of included studies. We identified 2554 abstracts and reviewed 300 full text articles. The quality of included studies was assessed using the RoB 2.0, the ROBINS-I and the ROBIN tool.

RESULTS

68 studies were included which related to post-term pregnancy (15), hypertension/pre-eclampsia (15), diabetes (9), prelabour rupture of membranes (5), twin pregnancy (5), suspected fetal compromise (4), maternal elevated body mass index (BMI) (4), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (3), suspected macrosomia (3), fetal gastroschisis (2), maternal age (2), and maternal cardiac disease (1). Available evidence supports IOL for women with post-term pregnancy, although the evidence is weak regarding the timing (41 versus 42 weeks), and for women with hypertension/preeclampsia in terms of improved maternal outcomes. For women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (24-37 weeks), high-quality evidence supports expectant management rather than IOL/early birth. Evidence is weakly supportive for IOL in women with term rupture of membranes. For all other indications, there were conflicting findings and/or insufficient power to provide definitive evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

While for some indications, IOL is clearly recommended, a number of common indications for IOL do not have strong supporting evidence. Overall, few RCTs have evaluated the various indications for IOL. For conditions where clinical equipoise regarding timing of birth may still exist, such as suspected macrosomia and elevated BMI, researchers and funding agencies should prioritise studies of sufficient power that can provide quality evidence to guide care in these situations.

A randomised controlled trial of amnioexchange for fetal gastroschisis

OBJECTIVE

Morbidity in fetuses affected by gastroschisis is mainly the result of bowel ischaemic and inflammatory processes. Experimental studies on animal models show that clearing amniotic fluid from the digestive secretions by amnioexchange procedures reduces the inflammatory process. We evaluated the benefit of the amnioexchange procedure for fetal gastroschisis in humans.

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional, randomised study.

SETTING

Eight referral centres for fetal medicine.

POPULATION

Pregnant women carrying a fetus with gastroschisis.

METHODS

We compared, in utero, amnioexchange with a sham procedure. The protocol included, in both arms, steroid injections at 30 weeks of gestation and the use of postnatal minimal enteral feeding.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was a composite variable based on the duration of ventilation and parenteral nutrition. Secondary outcomes were the effectiveness and safety of the amnioexchange procedure, including the rate of perinatal death, time to full enteral feeding, primary closure, and late feeding disorders.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were randomised. There was no difference in the composite criteria between the amnioexchange and control groups. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant between-group differences in pregnancy outcome or complications. When studying the relationship between digestive compounds and amniotic fluid inflammatory markers, a clear correlation was found between bile acid and both ferritin and interleukin 1β (IL1β).

CONCLUSIONS

In humans, amnioexchange, as described in our protocol, is not an option for fetal care; however, we provide supplementary proof of the involvement of inflammation in the pathogenicity of gastroschisis and suggest that future research should aim at reducing inflammation. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00127946.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

A prospective, interventional, randomised study shows no benefit of amnioexchange for fetal gastroschisis in humans.

The association between gestational age at delivery, closure type and perinatal outcomes in neonates with isolated gastroschisis

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the association between gestational age at delivery and closure type for neonates with gastroschisis. In addition, we compared perinatal outcomes among the cases of gastroschisis based on the following two factors: gestational age at delivery and abdominal wall closure technique.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all fetuses with isolated gastroschisis that were diagnosed prenatally and delivered between September 2000 and January 2017, in a single tertiary care center. Neonates were compared based on the gestational age at the time of delivery: early preterm (less than 35^0/7 weeks), late preterm (35^0/7 - 36^6/7 weeks), and early term (37^0/6 - 38^6/7 weeks), using bivariate and multivariate analyses. The primary outcome was the type of abdominal wall closure: primary surgical closure or delayed closure using spring-loaded silo. Secondary outcomes included length of ventilatory support, length of parenteral nutrition, and length of hospital stay.Results: The analysis included 206 pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis. In univariate analysis, no differences were detected in primary closure rates of gastroschisis among the gestational age at delivery groups (67.4%, at <35 weeks, 70.8% at 35^0/7-36^6/7 weeks, 73.7% at 37^0/6-38^6/7 weeks, p = .865). However, for every additional 100 grams of neonatal live birth weight there was an associated 9% increased odds of primary closure (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.14-1.19, p = .04). Delivery in the early preterm period compared to the other two groups, was associated with longer duration of ventilation support and longer dependence on the parenteral nutrition. Neonates who underwent primary closure had shorter ventilation support, shorter time to initiation of enteral feeds and to discontinue parenteral nutrition, and shorter length of stay. In multivariate analyses, controlling for gestational age at delivery and presence of bowel atresia, primary closure continued to be associated with the shorter duration of ventilation (by 5 days), earlier initiation of enteral feeds (by 7 days), shorter hospital stay (by 17 days) and lower odds of wound infection (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.97).Conclusions: Our study did not find an association between gestational age at delivery and the rates of primary closure of the abdominal wall defect; however later gestational age at delivery was associated with shorter duration of ventilatory support and parenteral nutrition dependence. In addition, we found that primary closure of gastroschisis, compared with delayed closure technique, was associated with improved neonatal outcomes, including shorter time to initiate enteral feeds and discontinue parenteral nutrition, shorter hospital stay, and lower risk of surgical wound infection. Therefore, postponing delivery of fetuses with gastroschisis until 37 weeks may be considered. Other factors besides the gestational age at delivery should be explored as predictors of primary closure in neonates with gastroschisis.

Risk stratification and outcome determinants in gastroschisis

Selection of outcome determinants and risk stratification are necessary to identify patients at higher risk for morbidity and mortality. This facilitates human and material resource allocation and allows for improved family counseling. While several different factors, including prenatal ultrasonographic bowel features, the timing and mode of delivery, and the features of bowel injury have been investigated in gastroschisis, there is still significant debate as to which of these best predicts outcome. This article reviews the different outcome predictors and risk prognostication schemata currently available in the literature to help guide clinicians caring for infants with gastroschisis.

Advances in prenatal and perinatal diagnosis and management of gastroschisis

Gastroschisis is a congenital, ventral wall defect associated with bowel evisceration. The defect is usually to the right of the umbilical cord insertion and requires postnatal surgical correction. The fetus is at risk for complications such as intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery, and intrauterine fetal demise. In addition, complex cases, defined by the presence of intestinal complications such as bowel atresia, stenosis, perforation, or ischemia, occur in up to one third of pregnancies affected by gastroschisis. As complex gastroschisis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, research has focused on the prenatal detection of this high risk subset of cases. The purpose of this review is to discuss the prenatal, diagnostic approach to the identification of gastroschisis, to describe potential signs of complex gastroschisis on prenatal ultrasound, to review current guidelines for antepartum management and delivery planning, and to summarize results of both past and current intervention trials in fetuses with gastroschisis.

Complexity of gastroschisis predicts outcome: epidemiology and experience in an Australian tertiary centre

Background

Gastroschisis is a congenital anomaly of the fetal abdominal wall, usually to the right side of umbilical insertion. It is often detected by routine antenatal ultrasound. Significant maternal and pediatric resources are utilised in the care of women and infants with gastroschisis. Increasing rates of gastroschisis worldwide have led institutions to review local data and investigate outcomes. A collaborative project was developed to review local epidemiology and investigate antenatal and neonatal factors influencing hospital length of stay (LOS) and total parental nutrition (TPN) in infants born with gastroschisis.

Methods

We performed a five-year review of infants born with gastroschisis (2011–2015) at a major Australian centre. Complex gastroschisis was defined as involvement of stenosis, atresia, ischemia, volvulus or perforation and closed or vanishing gastroschisis. We extracted data from files and databases at the two participating hospitals, a major maternal fetal medicine centre and the affiliated children’s hospital.

Results

There were 56 infants antenatally diagnosed with gastroschisis with no terminations, one stillbirth (2%) and one infant with ‘vanishing’ gastroschisis. The mean maternal age was 23.9 years (range, 15–39 years). The mean gestation at delivery was 36 weeks (range, 25–39^+ 3 weeks). Of the 55 neonates who received surgical management, 62% had primary closure. The median LOS was 33 (IQR, 23–45) days and the median duration of TPN was 26 (IQR, 17–36) days. Longer days on TPN (median 35 vs 16 days, P = 0.03) was associated with antenatal finding of multiple dilated bowel loops. Postnatal diagnosis of complex gastroschisis was made in 16% of cases and was associated with both longer LOS (median 89 vs 30 days, P = 0.003) and days on TPN (median 46 vs 21 days, P = 0.009).

Conclusion

Complex gastroschisis was associated with greater days on TPN and LOS. We found no late-gestation stillbirths and a low overall rate of 1.8%, suggesting the risk for stillbirth associated with gastroschisis is lower than previously documented. This information may assist counselling families. Improved data collection worldwide may reveal causative factors and enable antenatal outcome predictors.

National Practice Patterns for Prenatal Monitoring in Gastroschisis: Gastroschisis Outcomes of Delivery (GOOD) Provider Survey

BACKGROUND

Gastroschisis is an abdominal wall defect with increasing incidence. Given the lack of surveillance guidelines among maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialists, this study describes current practices in gastroschisis management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was administered to MFM specialists from institutions affiliated with the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet). Questions focused on surveillance timing, testing, findings that changed clinical management, and delivery plan.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 29/29 (100%) NAFTNet centers, comprising 143/371 (39%) providers. The majority had a regimen for antenatal surveillance in patients with stable gastroschisis (94%; 134/141). Antenatal testing began at 32 weeks for 68% (89/131) of MFM specialists. The nonstress test (55%; 72/129), biophysical profile (50%; 63/126), and amniotic fluid index (64%; 84/131) were used weekly. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was performed monthly by 79% (103/131) of providers. At 28 weeks, abnormal EFW (77%; 97/126) and Doppler ultrasound (78%; 99/127) most frequently altered management. In stable gastroschisis, 43% (60/140) of providers delivered at 37 weeks, and 29% (40/ 140) at 39 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Gastroschisis management differs among NAFTNet centers, although the majority initiate surveillance at 32 weeks. Timing of delivery still requires consensus. Prospective studies are necessary to further optimize practice guidelines and patient care.

Outcome of neonates with gastroschisis at different gestational ages using a national database

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The optimal time for delivery of neonates with a prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis (GS) is controversial. We compared the outcomes for GS at three different gestational ages (GAs), 33-34 weeks, 35-36 weeks, and ≥ 37 weeks.

METHODS

We analyze hospital discharge data of neonates with GS using the 2006, 2009 and 2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database (HCUPKIDS). Multivariable analysis was used to compare the association between GS outcomes and the three GAs.

RESULTS

Significantly higher number of 33-34 week infants had coexisting morbidities like respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, small bowel atresia, stenosis, or stricture, large bowel atresia and/or stenosis, malrotation, and atrial septal defect. In multivariable logistic regression, 33-34 week infants had higher NEC (p value = 0.002, 95% CI1.64-10.32), small bowel resection (0.024, 1.12-5.25) and pRBCs transfusion (0.024, 1.05-2.11). No differences were found between 35-36 weeks and ≥37 weeks gest infants for NEC, malabsorption, small bowel resection, TPN cholestasis, sepsis, CLABSI, number of pRBCs transfusion, length of stay and total charges.

CONCLUSION

We did not show benefit for delivering early and in the absence of data, delivery at ≥37 weeks was noninferior to 35-36 weeks. We suggest that waiting for spontaneous onset of labor may be a better approach to balance the effects of prematurity and possible ongoing in utero bowel damage/stillbirth.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level 3 (Retrospective comparative study).

Understanding gastroschisis and its clinical management: where are we?

Gastroschisis is the commonest developmental defect of the anterior abdominal wall in both developed and developing countries. The past 30 years have seen transformational improvements in outcome due to advances in neonatal intensive care and enhanced integration between the disciplines of maternal fetal medicine, neonatology and pediatric surgery. A review of gastroschisis, which emphasizes its epidemiology, multidisciplinary care strategies and contemporary outcomes is timely. Areas covered: This review discusses the current state of knowledge related to prevalence and causation, and postulated embryopathologic mechanisms contributing to the development of gastroschisis. Using relevant, current literature with an emphasis on high level evidence where it exists, we review modern techniques of prenatal diagnosis, pre and postnatal risk stratification, preferred timing and method of delivery, options for abdominal wall closure, nutritional management, and short and long term clinical and neurodevelopmental follow-up. Expert commentary: This section explores controversies in contemporary management which contribute to practice and cost variation and discusses the benefits of novel nutritional therapies and care standardization that target unnecessary practice variation and improve overall cost-effectiveness of gastroschisis care. The commentary concludes with a review of fertile areas of gastroschisis research, which represent opportunities for knowledge synthesis and further outcome improvement.

Mode of delivery in pregnancies with gastroschisis according to delivery institution

Purpose: We aim to compare the mode of delivery in pregnancies with gastroschisis delivered in nonacademic institutions with those delivered in an academic center. Material and methods: Chart review from 2008 to 2015 was performed. Cesarean delivery rate (CDR), attempted vaginal delivery rate (AVR), planned cesarean rate (PCR) and adverse neonatal outcomes were compared among pregnancies with gastroschisis delivered in nonacademic hospitals with those delivered in an academic institution. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analysis was performed when appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression mode was utilized to control for confounders. A p value < .05 was considered significant. Results: Mode of delivery was documented in 94 cases (88%). CDR (76.7 versus 41.2%; odds ratios (OR), 4.7; 95%CI, 1.9-11.6) and PCR (55 versus 6.4%; OR 17.9; 95%CI, 4.8-67.4) were higher in those delivered in nonacademic centers. AVR was lower in the nonacademic group (45 versus 93.6%; OR 0.02; 95%CI, 0.01-0.2). Neonatal intensive care length of stay (56 days [IQR, 34-102 days] versus 36 days [IQR, 26-60 days; p = .018]) was longer in the nonacademic group. Other neonatal adverse outcomes studied were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: In our population, delivery at nonacademic institutions in pregnancies with gastroschisis may be associated with higher cesarean delivery rates. These findings may add information for the delivery planning of pregnancies complicated by this condition. Rationale: In our study we aim to compare the mode of delivery in pregnancies with gastroschisis delivered in nonacademic institutions with those delivered in an academic center. Our results suggest, that delivery at nonacademic institutions in pregnancies with gastroschisis may be associated with higher cesarean delivery rates. These findings may add information for the delivery planning of pregnancies complicated by this condition.

Gastroschisis: A Review of Management and Outcomes

We performed an evidence-based review of the obstetrical management of gastroschisis. Gastroschisis is an abdominal wall defect, which has increased in frequency in recent decades. There is variation of prevalence by ethnicity and several known maternal risk factors. Herniated intestinal loops lacking a covering membrane can be identified with prenatal ultrasonography, and maternal serum α-fetoprotein level is commonly elevated. Because of the increased risk for growth restriction, amniotic fluid abnormalities, and fetal demise, antenatal testing is generally recommended. While many studies have aimed to identify antenatal predictors of neonatal outcome, accurate prognosis remains challenging. Delivery by 37 weeks appears reasonable, with cesarean delivery reserved for obstetric indications. Postnatal surgical management includes primary surgical closure, staged reduction with silo, or sutureless umbilical closure. Overall prognosis is good with low long-term morbidity in the majority of cases, but approximately 15% of cases are very complex with complicated hospital course, extensive intestinal loss, and early childhood death.

Risk of preterm birth by subtype among Medi-Cal participants with mental illness

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated an association between mental illness and preterm birth (before 37 weeks). However, these investigations have not simultaneously considered gestation of preterm birth, the indication (eg, spontaneous or medically indicated), and specific mental illness classifications.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to examine the likelihood of preterm birth across gestational lengths and indications among Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid program) participants with a diagnostic code for mental illness. Mental illnesses were studied by specific illness classification.

STUDY DESIGN

The study population was drawn from singleton live births in California from 2007 through 2011 in the birth cohort file maintained by the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, which includes birth certificate and hospital discharge records. The sample was restricted to women with Medi-Cal coverage for prenatal care. Women with mental illness were identified using International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, codes from their hospital discharge record. Women without a mental illness International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, code were randomly selected at a 4:1 ratio. Adjusting for maternal characteristics and obstetric complications, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for preterm birth comparing women with a mental illness diagnostic code with women without such a code.

RESULTS

We identified 6198 women with a mental illness diagnostic code and selected 24,792 women with no such code. The risk of preterm birth in women with a mental illness were 1.2 times higher than women without a mental illness (adjusted relative risk, 1.2, 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3). Among the specific mental illnesses, schizophrenia, major depression, and personality disorders had the strongest associations with preterm birth (adjusted relative risks, 2.0, 2.0 and 3.3, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Women receiving prenatal care through California's low-income health insurance who had at least 1 mental illness diagnostic code were 1.2-3.3-times more likely to have a preterm birth than women without a mental illness, and these risks persisted across most illness classifications. Although it cannot be determined from these data whether specific treatments for mental illness contribute to the observed associations, elevated risk across different diagnoses suggests that some aspects of mental illness itself may confer risk.

Management of gastroschisis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis and treatment of gastroschisis spans the perinatal disciplines of maternal fetal medicine, neonatology, and pediatric surgery. Since gastroschisis is one of the commonest and costliest structural birth defects treated in neonatal ICUs, a comprehensive review of its epidemiology, prenatal diagnosis, postnatal treatment, and short and long-term outcomes is both timely and relevant.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of gastroschisis has increased dramatically over the past 20 years, leading to a renewed interest in causation. The widespread availability of maternal screening and ultrasound results in very high rates of prenatal diagnosis, which enables evaluation of the optimal timing and mode of delivery. The preferred method of surgical closure continues to be an issue of debate among pediatric surgeons, whereas postsurgical treatment seeks to expedite the initiation and progression of enteral feeding and minimize complications. A small subset of babies with complex gastroschisis leading to intestinal failure benefit from the knowledge and expertise of dedicated interdisciplinary teams, which seek to bring novel therapies and improved clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY

The opportunities to increase the knowledge of causation, and identify best practices leading to improved outcomes, drive the ongoing need for collaborative clinical research in gastroschisis.

Sonographic markers associated with adverse neonatal outcomes among fetuses with gastroschisis: an 11-year, single-center review

BACKGROUND

Gastroschisis complicates 1 in 2000 births and is readily identifiable during prenatal ultrasound scans. Outcomes in fetuses that are affected by gastroschisis vary widely from stillbirth or neonatal death to uncomplicated surgical correction, which makes prenatal counseling challenging.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of our study was to identify sonographic markers that are associated with perinatal death and morbidity that include significant bowel injury, necrotizing enterocolitis, and the need for bowel resection in fetuses with gastroschisis.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified a cohort of fetuses that were diagnosed with gastroschisis from 2003-2014. Sonographic markers that were reviewed included growth restriction, abdominal circumference, oligohydramnios, bowel dilation, and gastric bubble characteristics. We evaluated these markers both at diagnosis and near delivery. Four adverse perinatal outcomes were assessed: perinatal death, necrotizing enterocolitis, need for bowel resection, and a composite of significant bowel injury, which included a diagnosis of bowel atresia or necrosis at the time of surgical exploration. Logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each marker and outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven patients were identified, and 154 of these patients met inclusion criteria after exclusions for delivery <24 weeks gestation, other associated anomalies, lethal karyotype, or lost to follow-up evaluation. Markers at the time of diagnosis (median gestational age, 21 weeks [25th,75th interquartile range, 19, 24 weeks]) that were associated with perinatal death were abdominal circumference <5th percentile (odds ratio, 5.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-24.76), abnormal gastric bubble (odds ratio, 11.20; 95% confidence interval, 2.15-58.33), and abnormal stomach location (odds ratio, 17.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.99-97.85). An abnormal stomach location (odds ratio, 5.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-29.72) before delivery was associated with perinatal death. Gastric dilation before delivery (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-17.34)] was associated with the need for bowel resection.

CONCLUSION

Early sonographic markers of increased perinatal mortality rates include abdominal circumference <5th percentile and an abnormal gastric bubble.