Implication of fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil count in severe asthma

Guidance for type 2 inflammatory biomarkers

Type 2 inflammation in the airways and lungs is inflammation induced by type 2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, produced primarily by type 2 helper T cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cells, and causes changes in the physiology and structure of the airways. Type 2 inflammation is currently in the spotlight because of its direct link to the treatment of several airway and lung diseases. Abundant evidences have accumulated that inflammatory biomarkers such as blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and IgE are essential clinical tools in the diagnosis and management of asthma and COPD. It is well known that asthma and COPD have diverse inflammatory phenotypes even when clinical features are similar, and it has been demonstrated that assessment of airway inflammation with biomarkers can improve diagnostic accuracy, determine safer and more effective treatment strategies, and predict future risks such as exacerbations and lung function decline. The Japanese Respiratory Society has published clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation of type 2 inflammation in the airways and lungs. In addition to asthma and COPD, the guide covers a wide range of airway and lung diseases, including interstitial lung disease, allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis, allergic rhinitis, and eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis. It also provides comprehensive guidelines covering a variety of clinical biomarkers. The purpose of this guidance is to provide evidences for the interpretation of type 2 inflammation measurements and to promote the widespread use of inflammation assessment to further improve the efficiency of airway and respiratory disease management.

Molecular mechanisms and clinical impact of biologic therapies in severe asthma

Severe asthma is a critical condition for patients with asthma, characterized by frequent exacerbations, decreased pulmonary function, and unstable symptoms related to asthma. Consequently, the administration of systemic corticosteroids, which cause secondary damage because of their adverse effects, is considered. Recently, several types of molecular-targeted biological therapies have become available for patients with severe asthma, and they have a capacity to improve the pathophysiology of severe asthma. However, several clinical reports indicate that the effects differ depending on the biological targets of asthma in individual patients. In this review, the molecular mechanisms and clinical impact of biologic therapies in severe asthma are described. In addition, molecules targeted by possible future biologics are also addressed. Better understanding of the mechanistic basis for the role of biologics in severe asthma could lead to new therapeutic options for these patients.

Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO)

Purpose

To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO200) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).

Methods

A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.

Results

The values of FENO200 in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO200 exhibited negative correlations with FEV1/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO200 and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV1, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO200 demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV1, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV1 in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO200. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV1 was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO50 discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.

Conclusion

In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO200 has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO200 levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO200 and CANO, FENO50 may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.

Update on Inflammatory Biomarkers for Defining Asthma Phenotype

Asthma is a chronic heterogeneous disease characterized by various symptoms and persistent airway inflammation, resulting in progressive lung function decline. Classifying asthma phenotypes/endotypes is crucial because the underlying mechanisms and long-term outcomes vary from patient to patient. Recent trials have identified several biomarkers for classifying asthma phenotypes/endotypes, and current treatments have been developed on the basis of these biomarkers. Conventional biomarkers, including immunoglobulin E, blood/sputum eosinophil counts, airway obstruction or reversibility, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, are widely used to diagnose asthma. However, these markers have some limitations, necessitating the discovery of additional biomarkers. Therefore, this review summarizes recently suggested biomarkers for representing type 2-high (eosinophilic) vs. type 2-low (neutrophilic) asthma, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, and severe asthma. Additionally, we discuss the potential benefits of these biomarkers in classifying specific phenotypes/endotypes and managing asthmatic patients.

The Possible Roles of IL-4/IL-13 in the Development of Eosinophil-Predominant Severe Asthma

Bronchial asthma is characterized by airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, and reversible airway obstruction. Eosinophils contribute to the pathogenesis of airway disease mainly by releasing eosinophil-specific granules, lipid mediators, superoxide anions, and their DNA. Type-2 cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 also play roles in the development of bronchial asthma. Among these cytokines, IL-4 is involved in T-cell differentiation, B-cell activation, B-cell differentiation into plasma cells, and the production of immunoglobulin E. Although IL-13 has similar effects to IL-4, IL-13 mainly affects structural cells, such as epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts. IL-13 induces the differentiation of goblet cells that produce mucus and induces the airway remodeling, including smooth muscle hypertrophy. IL-4 and IL-13 do not directly activate the effector functions of eosinophils; however, they can induce eosinophilic airway inflammation by upregulating the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (for adhesion) and CC chemokine receptor 3 ligands (for migration). Dupilumab, a human anti-IL-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, decreases asthma exacerbations and mucus plugs and increases lung function in moderate to severe asthma. In addition, dupilumab is effective for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and for atopic dermatitis, and IL-4/IL-13 blocking is expected to suppress allergen sensitization, including transcutaneous sensitization and atopic march.

Burden of Uncontrolled Severe Asthma With and Without Elevated Type-2 Inflammatory Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Many patients with asthma have type-2 airway inflammation, identified by the presence of biomarkers, including history of allergy, high blood eosinophil (EOS) count, and high fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels.

OBJECTIVE

To assess disease burden in relation to type-2 inflammatory biomarker status (history of allergy, blood EOS count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level) in patients with uncontrolled and controlled severe asthma in the NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY (NOVELTY) (NCT02760329).

METHODS

Asthma diagnosis and severity were physician-reported. Control was defined using Asthma Control Test score (uncontrolled <20, controlled ≥20) and/or 1 or more severe physician-reported exacerbation in the previous year. Biomarker distribution (history of allergy, blood EOS count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level), symptom burden (Asthma Control Test score, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score), exacerbations, and health care resource utilization were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 647 patients with severe asthma, 446 had uncontrolled and 123 had controlled asthma. Among those with uncontrolled asthma, 196 (44%) had 2 or more positive biomarkers, 187 (42%) had 1 positive biomarker, 325 (73%) had low blood EOS, and 63 (14%) were triple-negative. Disease burden was similarly high across uncontrolled subgroups, irrespective of biomarker status, with poor symptom control (Asthma Control Test score 14.9-16.6), impaired health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score 46.7-49.4), clinically important breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council grade ≥2 in 47.3%-57.1%), and 1 or more severe exacerbation (70.6%-76.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Type-2 inflammatory biomarkers did not differentiate disease burden in patients with severe asthma. Patients with low type-2 inflammatory biomarker levels have few biologic therapy options; their needs should be addressed.

1-Year Prospective Study of the Relationship of Serial Exhaled Nitric Oxide Level and Asthma Control

Background and Objective

Previous studies found that the fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath (FeNO) levels in healthy Chinese adults was higher than in White adults. More understanding of serial changes of FeNO levels with asthma control in a real-life clinical setting would be important to explore the utility of this biomarker in routine asthma management. This study assessed the FeNO levels of Chinese asthma subjects with different levels of asthma control and the serial changes with respect to the changes in asthma control over 1 year.

Methods

A 12-month prospective study (subjects recruited between November 2019 and January 2021) with serial measurement of FeNO levels at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months. Asthma control was assessed by the Global Initiative for Asthma classification, Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ).

Results

Altogether, 136 subjects (mean age 51.51±15.09 years, 46[33.8%] male) had successful baseline FeNO measurements. At baseline, the FeNO levels did not show a statistically significant difference for controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma according to GINA classification, ACT and ACQ. FeNO levels decreased with improving asthma control and stayed at similar levels with unchanged or worsening asthma control for all subjects. For subjects with baseline blood eosinophil levels ≥300 cells/µL(n=59), FeNO levels decreased with improving asthma control, stayed similar without change for asthma control and increased with worsening asthma control. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with the highest area under curve (AUC) for changes in FeNO levels for improving asthma control was between ≤ -10 to -25 ppb at various time points in the 12-month study.

Conclusion

Changes in FeNO levels over time were associated with changes in clinical asthma control, particularly in those with higher blood eosinophil count and are likely more useful than a single time point measurement in managing asthma.

A Retrospective Claims Database Study to Clarify Disease Burden of Severe Asthma Patients with Type 2 High or Low Inflammation

Purpose

The disease burden of severe asthma patients stratified by type 2 (T2) biomarkers is not well studied in large patient samples, especially for T2-low severe asthma patients. Using a Japanese medical record database, we investigated disease and economic burdens in T2-high and T2-low severe asthma patients.

Patients and Methods

Data of severe asthma patients (receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and additional asthma-related controller medications or oral corticosteroids [OCS] prescription [≥183 days] during the 1-year baseline period) were analyzed in the Real World Data database, comprising electronic medical records from Japanese medical institutions. Severe asthma patients were stratified into a T2-high population with higher eosinophils (≥150 cells/μL) and/or higher total immunoglobulin E (IgE, ≥75 IU/mL) or a T2-low population with lower eosinophils (<150 cells/μL) and lower total IgE (<75 IU/mL). The incidence of asthma exacerbation events and drug costs were analyzed for each population. Different T2 thresholds were explored, including eosinophil count 300 cells/μL and/or IgE 150 IU/mL.

Results

Of the 732 severe asthma patients, 599 (81.8%) patients had T2-high type, and 133 (18.2%) had T2-low type. Proportions of the T2-high patients (30.6%) with asthma exacerbations, defined as a composite outcome, including OCS burst, injectable steroid use, and hospitalization, were similar to those of T2-low type (34.6%). The annual drug cost was similar between T2-high (175,487 JPY) and T2-low (165,322 JPY) populations.

Conclusion

In this large-scale study, both T2-high and T2-low severe asthma patients in Japan were shown to have a high disease burden and high economic burden, suggesting an unmet treatment need.

Measurement of Blood Eosinophils in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Eosinophils are important effector cells in airway inflammation, as pleiotropy and heterogeneity can be linked to various pathophysiologies in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Sputum eosinophils can reflect the heterogeneity of airway inflammation, and owing to their traits, blood eosinophils can be a surrogate and potential biomarker for managing both conditions. Blood eosinophils are activated via the stimulation of type 2 cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4/13, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin. There is sufficient evidence to support the relationship between the blood eosinophil count and clinical outcomes, including pulmonary function decline, exacerbations, all-cause mortality, and treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids and biologics. Thus, there is growing interest in the use of blood eosinophils for the management of these diseases. Compiling recent evidence, we herein review the significance of measuring blood eosinophils in asthma and COPD.

Effect of General Anesthesia Maintenance with Propofol or Sevoflurane on Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Eosinophil Blood Count: A Prospective, Single Blind, Randomized, Clinical Study on Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy

Background: Nitric oxide (NO) is considered a means of detecting airway hyperresponsiveness, since even non-asthmatic patients experiencing bronchospasm intraoperatively or postoperatively display higher levels of exhaled NO. It can also be used as a non-invasive biomarker of lung inflammation and injury. This prospective, single-blind, randomized study aimed to evaluate the impact of two different anesthesia maintenance techniques on fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeΝO) in patients without respiratory disease undergoing total thyroidectomy under general anesthesia. Methods: Sixty patients without respiratory disease, atopy or known allergies undergoing total thyroidectomy were randomly allocated to receive either inhalational anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane at a concentration that maintained Bispectral Index (BIS) values between 40 and 50 intraoperatively or intravenous anesthesia maintenance with propofol 1% targeting the same BIS values. FeΝO was measured immediately preoperatively (baseline), postoperatively in the Postanesthesia Care Unit and at 24 h post-extubation with a portable device. Other variables measured were eosinophil blood count preoperatively and postoperatively and respiratory parameters intraoperatively. Results: Patients in both groups presented lower than baseline values of FeΝO measurements postoperatively, which returned to baseline measurements at 24 h post-extubation. In the peripheral blood, a decrease in the percentage of eosinophils was demonstrated, which was significant only in the propofol group. Respiratory lung mechanics were better maintained in the propofol group as compared to the sevoflurane group. None of the patients suffered intraoperative bronchospasm. Conclusions: Both propofol and sevoflurane lead to the temporary inhibition of NO exhalation. They also seem to attenuate systemic hypersensitivity response by reducing the eosinophil count in the peripheral blood, with propofol displaying a more pronounced effect and ensuring a more favorable mechanical ventilation profile as compared to sevoflurane. The attenuation of NO exhalation by both agents may be one of the underlying mechanisms in the reduction in airway hyperreactivity. The clinical significance of this fluctuation remains to be studied in patients with respiratory disease.

Influence of Home Indoor Dampness Exposure on Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath of Mothers and Their Infants: The NELA Birth Cohort

Currently, the effect of exposure to indoor air contaminants and the presence of dampness at home on respiratory/atopic health is of particular concern to physicians. The measurement of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath is a useful approach for monitoring environmental exposures. A great advantage of this strategy is that it allows the study of the impact of pollutants on the metabolism through a non-invasive method. In this paper, the levels of nine VOCs (acetone, isoprene, toluene, p/m-xylene, o-xylene, styrene, benzaldehyde, naphthalene, and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol) in the exhaled breath of subjects exposed and not exposed to home dampness were assessed. Exhaled breath samples were collected from 337 mother–child pairs of a birth cohort and analysed by gas-chromatography–mass-spectrometry. It was observed that the levels of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol in the exhaled breath of the mothers were significantly influenced by exposure to household humidity. In the case of the infants, differences in some of the VOC levels related to home dampness exposure; however, they did not reach statistical significance. In addition, it was also found that the eosinophil counts of the mothers exposed to home dampness were significantly elevated compared to those of the non-exposed mothers. To our knowledge, these findings show, for the first time, that exposure to home dampness may influence VOC patterns in exhaled breath.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Liquid Biomarkers in Airway Diseases: Toward Point-of-Care Applications

Background

Liquid biomarkers have shown increasing utility in the clinical management of airway diseases. Salivary and blood samples are particularly amenable to point-of-care (POC) testing due to simple specimen collection and processing. However, very few POC tests have successfully progressed to clinical application due to the uncertainty and unpredictability surrounding their diagnostic accuracy.

Objective

To review liquid biomarkers of airway diseases with well-established diagnostic accuracies and discuss their prospects for future POC applications.

Methodology

A literature review of publications indexed in Medline or Embase was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liquid biomarkers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), and COVID-19.

Results

Of 3,628 studies, 71 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Sputum and blood eosinophils were the most frequently investigated biomarkers for the management of asthma and COPD. Salivary pepsin was the only biomarker with a well-documented accuracy for the diagnosis of LPR. Inflammatory blood biomarkers (e.g., CRP, D-dimers, ferritin) were found to be useful to predict the severity, complications, and mortality related to COVID-19 infection.

Conclusion

Multiple liquid biomarkers have well-established diagnostic accuracies and are thus amenable to POC testing in clinical settings.

Baseline type 2 biomarker levels and response to tezepelumab in severe asthma

Background

Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks activity of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). In the phase IIb PATHWAY study (NCT02054130), tezepelumab significantly reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates (AAERs) versus placebo in adults with severe, uncontrolled asthma. We evaluated the effects of tezepelumab in reducing type 2 (T2) inflammatory biomarker levels in the PATHWAY population, and the relationship between baseline T2 biomarker levels and AAER.

Methods

Adults with severe, uncontrolled asthma (n = 550) were randomized to tezepelumab (70 mg or 210 mg every 4 weeks, or 280 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo for 52 weeks. Blood eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and serum total immunoglobulin (Ig)E, interleukin (IL)‐5, IL‐13, periostin, thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine (TARC), and TSLP were measured at baseline and over 52 weeks. AAERs were analyzed by baseline threshold (high/low) biomarker levels.

Results

Positive correlations were observed between T2 inflammatory biomarkers (blood eosinophil count, FeNO, IL‐5, IL‐13 and periostin) at baseline. At Week 52, treatment with tezepelumab 210 mg reduced all biomarker levels measured from baseline versus placebo. Exacerbations were reduced by 55–83% in the pooled tezepelumab cohort versus placebo, irrespective of baseline blood eosinophil count, FeNO, or serum total IgE, IL‐5, IL‐13, periostin, TARC, or TSLP, when these biomarkers were assessed individually.

Conclusion

At baseline, positive correlations between specific T2 inflammatory biomarkers were observed. Tezepelumab reduced multiple T2 inflammatory biomarkers, which indicates decreased airway inflammation, and reduced exacerbations irrespective of baseline T2 biomarker profiles in patients with severe asthma.

Treatment Resistance in Severe Asthma Patients With a Combination of High Fraction of Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Low Blood Eosinophil Counts

Background: Combining a fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil count (B-EOS) may be a useful strategy for administration of biologics such as anti-IgE or anti-IL-5 to patients with type 2 inflammatory-predominant severe asthma and is important to be elucidated considering the increasing use of biologics.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the clinical data from 114 adult patients with severe asthma, who were treated at Saitama Medical University Hospital. The eligible patients were stratified into four subgroups defined by thresholds of FeNO and blood eosinophil (B-EOS) counts to detect sputum eosinophilia, using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A total of 75 patients with optimal samples were stratified into four subtypes defined by thresholds of sputum eosinophilia and neutrophilia. Clinical characteristics, pattern of biologics, and distribution of sputum subtypes were analyzed in the stratified subclasses according to the FeNO and B-EOS thresholds. The asthma exacerbation (AE)-free time of the FeNO/B-EOS subgroups and any biologics treatment including anti-IgE or anti-IL-5 use were examined using the Kaplan–Meier method. The hazard ratios (HRs) for AE-free time were examined using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: The optimal cutoff values for prediction of sputum eosinophilia were defined as ≥2.7% wherein for FeNO as ≥27 ppb and B-EOS as ≥265/µL were considered. The high-FeNO subgroups showed significant high total IgE, compared with the low FeNO. The high-FeNO/high-B-EOS and the high-FeNO/low-B-EOS subgroups showed the largest prevalence of mepolizumab and benralizumab use among the other FeNO/B-EOS, respectively. The high-FeNO/low-B-EOS showed the largest frequency of AEs, high HR, and the shortest AE-free time, among the other FeNO/B-EOS. The sputum eosinophil-predominant subtype was the great majority in the high FeNO/high B-EOS. A diverse distribution of sputum leukocyte-predominant subtype was observed in the other FeNO/B-EOS. The subsequent AE-free time and its HR were comparable among the biologics use groups.

Conclusion: The strategy of classifying severe asthma based on the combination of FeNO and B-EOS proposes particular refractory type 2 severe asthma and underlying airway inflammation as a feasible trait for optimal biologics use.

Using FeNO Measurement in Clinical Asthma Management

Asthma is a common and heterogeneous disease, characterised by lower airway inflammation and airflow limitation. Critical factors in asthma management include establishing an accurate diagnosis and ensuring appropriate selection and dosage of anti-inflammatory therapies. The majority of asthma patients exhibit type 2 (T2) inflammation, with increased interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 signalling, often with associated eosinophilia. Identifying lower airway eosinophilia with sputum induction improves asthma outcomes, but is time consuming and costly. Increased T2-inflammation leads to upregulation of nitric oxide (NO) release into the airway, with increasing fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) reflecting greater T2-inflammation. FeNO can be easily and quickly measured in the clinic, offering a point of care surrogate measure of the degree of lower airway inflammation. FeNO testing can be used to help confirm an asthma diagnosis, to guide inhaled corticosteroid therapy, to assess adherence to treatment, and to aid selection of appropriate biologic therapy. However, FeNO levels may also be influenced by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors other than asthma, including nasal polyposis and cigarette smoking, and must be interpreted in the broader clinical context rather than viewed in isolation. This review discusses the clinical application of FeNO measurement in asthma care, from diagnosis to treatment selection, and describes its place in current international expert guidelines.

Baseline FeNO as a prognostic biomarker for subsequent severe asthma exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma receiving placebo in the LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study: a post-hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has potential as a prognostic biomarker in asthma, but its prognostic value among other recognised indicators is unclear. We assessed the added prognostic value of baseline FeNO to blood eosinophil count and prior severe asthma exacerbations for subsequent exacerbations.

METHODS

In this post-hoc analysis of the 52-week, double-blind, phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST study, we identified 620 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who were randomly assigned to placebo; had uncontrolled asthma with inhaled glucocorticoids plus up to two controllers; one or more exacerbations in the previous year; FEV₁ percent predicted 40-80%; FEV₁ reversibility of 12% or higher and 200 mL; Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score of 1·5 or higher; and complete data on baseline type 2 biomarkers (FeNO, eosinophils, and total IgE) with no baseline minimum requirement. Annualised severe exacerbation rate was assessed by baseline FeNO (<25 ppb, ≥25 to <50 ppb, ≥50 ppb; negative binomial model) and cross-classified by baseline blood eosinophils (<150 cells per μL, ≥150 to <300 cells per μL, ≥300 cells per μL) and prior exacerbations (one, two or more), all adjusted for baseline ACQ-5, postbronchodilator FEV₁, and other clinical characteristics. Post-hoc analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST STUDY is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02414854, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Patients with baseline FeNO of 50 ppb or higher (n=144) had a 1·54-times higher exacerbation rate than patients with FeNO of less than 25 ppb (n=291; relative risk 1·54 [95% CI 1·11-2·14]; p=0·0097). Patients with baseline FeNO of 25 to <50 ppb (n=185) had a 1·33-times higher exacerbation rate than patients with FeNO of less than 25 ppb (1·33 [0·99-1·78]; p=0·0572). Patients with baseline FeNO of 25 ppb or higher, a blood eosinophil count of 150 cells per μL or higher, and two or more prior exacerbations (n=157) had an exacerbation rate 3·62-times higher than patients with FeNO of less than 25 ppb, a blood eosinophil count of less than 150 cells per μL, and one prior exacerbation (n=116; 3·62 [1·67-7·81]; p=0·0011).

INTERPRETATION

In uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma, higher baseline FeNO levels were associated with greater risk of severe asthma exacerbations, particularly in combination with elevated eosinophil count and prior exacerbations, supporting the added value of FeNO as a prognostic biomarker. Further research is needed to confirm FeNO as an independent predictor for asthma exacerbations.

FUNDING

Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Systemic and breath biomarkers for asthma: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Finding suitable biomarkers to phenotype asthma, identify individuals at risk of worsening and guide treatment is highly prioritized in asthma research. We aimed to provide an analysis of currently used and upcoming biomarkers, focusing on developments published in the past 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Type 2 inflammation is the most studied asthma mechanism with the most biomarkers in the pipeline. Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are those most used clinically. Recent developments include their ability to identify individuals at higher risk of exacerbations, faster decline in lung function and more likely to benefit from anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-4/-13 treatment. Certain patterns of urinary eicosanoid excretion also relate to type 2 inflammation. Results of recent trials investigating the use of serum periostin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 to guide anti-IL-13 therapy were somewhat disappointing. Less is known about non-type 2 inflammation but blood neutrophils and YKL-40 may be higher in patients with evidence of non-type 2 asthma. Volatile organic compounds show promise in their ability to distinguish both eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthma.

SUMMARY

The ultimate panel of biomarkers for identification of activated inflammatory pathways and treatment strategies in asthma patients still lies in the future, particularly for non-type 2 asthma, but potential candidates are available.

Phenotype-Guided Asthma Therapy: An Alternative Approach to Guidelines

Despite recent advances in therapy, a substantial proportion of asthmatics remain not well controlled. The classical stepwise approach to pharmacological therapy in adult asthma recommends that treatment is progressively stepped up by increasing the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose or by adding another controller medication- to achieve symptom control and reduce the risk of exacerbations, and stepped down after a period of control. In general, asthma guideline recommendations do not reflect that there are significant differences between ICS in terms of potency. Moreover, they do not consider efficacy and safety separately, incorrectly assuming that "low" and "high" dose categories inevitably correspond with low and high risk of systemic effects. Another point of criticism is the fact that guidelines do not take into account the inflammatory profile of the patient, although substantial groups of patients with mild and moderate asthma have little evidence of "T2-high" inflammation, and by extension are likely to show a poor response to ICS treatment. On the other hand, the latest version of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) equally recommends regular ICS and ICS/formoterol as needed to prevent exacerbations in step 2 patients, without taking into consideration that the therapeutic objectives (exacerbations, symptoms) may differ between individual patients and that different goals may warrant distinct treatment strategies. In this review, we bring to the table several controversial issues concerning asthma treatment and suggest an alternative proposal that takes into consideration the potential side effects of high ICS doses, the patient's inflammatory profile and the therapeutic goals to be achieved.

Overlap of allergic, eosinophilic and type 2 inflammatory subtypes in moderate-to-severe asthma

Background

Current biologic therapies target allergic, eosinophilic or type 2 inflammation phenotypic asthma. However, frequency and degree of overlap among these subtypes is unclear.

Objective

To characterize overlap among allergic, eosinophilic and type 2 asthma phenotypes.

Methods

Post hoc analyses of baseline data were performed in two adult populations: (a) not selected for any asthma subtype (N = 935) and (b) selected for allergic asthma (N = 1049). Degree of overlap was examined using commonly accepted phenotypic definitions to guide treatment for allergic asthma (skin prick–positive and/or positive serum–specific immunoglobulin E > 0.35 kU/L) and eosinophilic asthma (blood eosinophil high count ≥ 300 cells/µL; low cut‐off ≥ 150 cells/µL). Consistent with previous studies, fractional exhaled nitric oxide high level of ≥ 35 ppb and low cut‐off of ≥ 25 ppb were selected as local markers of type 2 inflammation and to prevent overlap with the systemic eosinophilic asthma definition.

Results

In the non‐subtype–selected population, 78.0% had allergic asthma; of these, 39.5% had eosinophilic asthma and 29.5% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with eosinophilic asthma (40.6% of total), 75.8% had allergic asthma and 41.3% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with type 2 asthma (28.3% of total), 81.1% had allergic asthma and 59.2% had eosinophilic asthma. In the allergic asthma–selected population, 38.3% had eosinophilic asthma and 29.2% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with eosinophilic asthma, 46.3% had type 2 asthma. Within patients with type 2 asthma, 60.8% had eosinophilic asthma. Overlaps among subtypes increased at low cut‐off values.

Conclusions and clinical relevance

In this post hoc analysis in adults with moderate‐to‐severe asthma, allergic asthma was the most prevalent phenotype, followed by eosinophilic and type 2 asthma. Despite observed overlaps, a considerable proportion of patients had only a predominantly allergic subtype. Understanding the degree of overlap across phenotypes will help patient management and guide treatment options.

Rapid and remarkable effectiveness of benralizumab for treating severe bronchial asthma with intractable eosinophilic rhinosinusitis and eosinophilic otitis media: A case report

Severe bronchial asthma is a challenging disorder to treat and can impair quality of life (QOL) under conventional therapeutic modalities. We report the case of a 52-year-old woman with severe asthma associated with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) and eosinophilic otitis media (EOM). Although the patient was treated with a full dose of inhaled corticosteroid, leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), theophylline, burst use of oral corticosteroids (OCS), her asthmatic condition aggravated, disrupting her daily life. ECRS and EOM symptoms were also getting worse despite treatment with topical application of corticosteroids to the nose and ears, LTRA, and occasional use of OCS. In addition to asthmatic symptom, the patient always suffered from intractable nasal obstruction and hearing disturbance, which contributed to the heavily impaired QOL. However, the administration of benralizumab showed rapid and remarkable improvement not only in her asthmatic conditions but also in the symptoms of ECRS and EOM within a month. These results suggest that the use of benralizumab for the treatment of severe asthma with intractable ECRS and EOM should be considered when the patient's QOL is severely deteriorated.

A snapshot of exhaled nitric oxide and asthma characteristics: experience from high to low income countries

Nitric oxide is a gas produced in the airways of asthmatic subjects and related to T2 inflammation. It can be measured as fractional nitric oxide (FeNO) in the exhaled air and used as a non-invasive, easy to evaluate, rapid marker. It is now widely used in many settings to determine airway inflammation. The aim of this narrative review is to report relationship between FeNO and the physiopathologic characteristics of asthmatic patients. Factors affecting FeNO levels have also been analysed as well as the impact of corticosteroid, target therapies and rehabilitation programs. Considering the availability of the test, spreading this methodology to low income countries has also been considered as a possibility for evaluating airway inflammation and monitoring adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. PubMed data search has been performed restricted to English language papers. Research was limited to studies in adults unless studies in children were the only ones reported for a particular issue. This revision could be useful to summarize the role of FeNO in relation to asthma characteristics and help in the use of FeNO in different clinical settings particularly in low income countries.

Nasal nitric oxide in relation to asthma characteristics in a longitudinal asthma cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Cross-sectional studies report relations between low nasal nitric oxide (nNO) and poor asthma control and between low nNO and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In our cohort study, we studied if changes in nNO related to changes in asthma control, symptoms of CRS, or asthma or rhinitis medication.

METHODS

A total of 196 subjects with predominantly mild to moderate asthma, aged 10-35 years, performed nNO measurements at both baseline and follow-up after a median of 43 (range 23-65) months. Asthma control, CRS symptoms, and medication, were questionnaire-assessed at both timepoints. IgE sensitisation against aeroallergens was quantified at baseline.

RESULTS

There was an increase in nNO between baseline and follow-up (764 ± 269 ppb vs. 855 ± 288 ppb, p < 0.001). When adjusted for covariates, a larger increase in nNO was found in subjects sensitised to perennial aeroallergens than those not sensitised (92 (16-167) ppb), as well as in subjects with daily use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at baseline but not at follow-up than those on ICS daily at both timepoints (146 (51-242) ppb). In the same model, subjects using nasal steroids daily at both timepoints had decreased nNO compared with those without such treatment at both timepoints (-185 (-321-(-48)) ppb). No relations between changes in nNO levels and changes in asthma control or symptoms of CRS were found.

CONCLUSION

Longitudinal changes in nNO were not related to changes in asthma control, but were related to changes in asthma or rhinitis medication.

Relationship between airway inflammation and airflow limitation in elderly asthmatics

Background

The prevalence of asthma in elderly population has been increasing. Previous studies have demonstrated clinical characteristics of elderly asthmatics (EA). However, little is known regarding the influence of immunological change on the physiological status of EA.

Objective

We investigated the relationship between inflammatory mediators and the pulmonary function (PF) of EA.

Methods

Eligible adult asthmatics recruited from the Allergy Center of Saitama Medical University Hospital were classified into a non-EA group (<40 years old, n = 15) and an EA group (≥60 years old, n = 43). Sputum induction and PF tests were performed. Concentrations of an eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and neutrophil elastase (NE) in sputum supernatants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a fluorometric assay using a commercial assay kit, respectively. Cell counts and EDN and NE concentrations in sputum were compared between the 2 groups. The association among those parameters and PF were analyzed in each group.

Results

The EA group had a significantly higher severe asthmatics proportion (p = 0.01), a lower current smokers proportion (p = 0.002), lower sensitization rate to aeroallergens (p = 0.012), several PFs deterioration (p < 0.0001) and lower total IgE levels (p = 0.001) than the non-EA group. Sputum neutrophil counts and NE concentrations were significantly higher in the EA group than those in the non-EA group (median neutrophil: 4.11 vs. 2.74 ×10⁵/mL, p = 0.03; NE: 2.0 vs.1.6 µg/mL, p < 0.05, respectively), whereas sputum eosinophil counts and EDN concentrations were not. Sputum EDN concentrations were significantly positively correlated with sputum neutrophil counts (r = 0.39, p = 0.031) and NE concentrations (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001) only in the EA group. Eosinophil-related parameters were negatively correlated with several PFs in the 2 groups. Neutrophil-related parameters were negatively correlated with PFs only in the non-EA group.

Conclusion

This study determines that in EA, persistent active eosinophilic airway inflammation is accompanied by advanced neutrophilic inflammation, which may contribute to deteriorated PF. This distinct airway inflammation may increase the severity of asthma in EA.

Clinical utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in severe asthma management

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, affecting over 350 million people worldwide and placing a significant burden on healthcare providers and wider society. Approximately 5-10% of asthma patients are diagnosed with severe asthma and typically are associated with increased risk of hospitalisation from exacerbations, increased morbidity, mortality and higher asthma-associated healthcare costs. Nitric oxide (NO) is an important regulator of immune responses and is a product of inflammation in the airways that is over-produced in asthma. Fractional exhaled NO (F _eNO) is predominantly used as a predictor of response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), to monitor adherence and as a diagnostic tool in ICS-naïve patients. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of F _eNO for the initial diagnosis of patients with suspected asthma. In the USA, American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines recommend F _eNO as part of the initial diagnosis of asthma and for monitoring of airway inflammation. F _eNO has also been shown to be a predictive factor for asthma exacerbations, with higher levels being associated with a greater number of exacerbations. In addition, higher levels of F _eNO have been shown to be associated with a decline in lung function. F _eNO testing is a cost-effective procedure and has been shown to improve patient management when combined with standard assessment methods. Recent evidence suggests that F _eNO may also be useful as a surrogate biomarker for the assessment and management of severe asthma and to predict responsiveness to some biological therapies.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) in the management of asthma: a position paper of the Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS) and Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Asthma prevalence in Italy is on the rise and is estimated to be over 6% of the general population. The diagnosis of asthma can be challenging and elusive, especially in children and the last two decades has brought evidences that asthma is not a single disease but consists of various phenotypes. Symptoms can be underestimated by the patient or underreported to the clinician and physical signs can be scanty. Usual objective measures, like spirometry, are necessary but sometimes not significant. Despite proper treatment, asthma can be a very severe condition (even leading to death), however new drugs have recently become available which can be very effective in its control. Since asthma is currently thought to be caused by inflammation, a direct measure of the latter can be of paramount importance. For this purpose, the measurement of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FE_NO) has been used since the early years of the current century as a non-invasive, easy-to-assess tool useful for diagnosing and managing asthma. This SIP-IRS/SIAAIC Position Paper is a narrative review which summarizes the evidence behind the usefulness of FE_NO in the diagnosis, management and phenotypization of asthma.

Toward clinically applicable biomarkers for asthma: An EAACI position paper

Inflammation, structural, and functional abnormalities within the airways are key features of asthma. Although these processes are well documented, their expression varies across the heterogeneous spectrum of asthma. Type 2 inflammatory responses are characterized by increased levels of eosinophils, FeNO, and type 2 cytokines in blood and/or airways. Presently, type 2 asthma is the best-defined endotype, typically found in patients with allergic asthma, but surprisingly also in nonallergic patients with (severe) asthma. The etiology of asthma with non-type 2 inflammation is less clear. During the past decade, targeted therapies, including biologicals and small molecules, have been increasingly integrated into treatment strategies of severe asthma. These treatments block specific inflammatory pathways or single mediators. Single or composite biomarkers help to identify patients who will benefit from these treatments. So far, only a few inflammatory biomarkers have been validated for clinical application. The European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology Task Force on Biomarkers in Asthma was initiated to review different biomarker sampling methods and to investigate clinical applicability of new and existing inflammatory biomarkers (point-of-care) to support diagnosis, targeted treatment, and monitoring of severe asthma. Subsequently, we discuss existing and novel targeted therapies for asthma as well as applicable biomarkers.

Serum levels of IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13 and IL-17A in pre-defined groups of adult patients with moderate and severe bronchial asthma

BACKGROUND

Bronchial asthma (BA) is a complex disease characterised by persistent inflammation. Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil count (b-Eos) are biomarkers for type 2 endotype of BA.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse a panel of serum interleukins and total IgE in predefined by FeNO and b-Eos groups of moderate and severe BA patients.

METHODS

Serum levels of IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13 and IL-17A (ELISA) were measured in 30 healthy controls (HC) and 80 adult BA patients. BA patients were split into 4 groups. Group 1:Low FeNO/Low b-Eos (n = 23; 28.8%); Group 2:Low FeNO/High b-Eos (n = 17; 21.3%); Group 3:High FeNO/Low b-Eos (n = 15; 18.8%); Group 4:High FeNO/High b-Eos (n = 25; 31.3%).

RESULTS

All interleukins and total IgE were significantly higher in patients with BA as compared with HC. IL-5 levels were highest in Group 2 (p < 0.05). IL-6, IL-13 and IL-17A levels were elevated in Groups 2, 3 and 4 as compared with HC (p < 0.05). Higher IL-8 levels were associated with a pattern of current smokers. Highest IL-17A levels were found in type 2 high groups with frequent exacerbations, mostly uncontrolled and severe BA. We have found a distinct pattern for each group based on demographic, clinical, functional, immunological and inflammatory characteristics.

CONCLUSION

FeNO and b-Eos are useful in the identification of severe type 2 BA subgroups with frequent exacerbations. IL-5, IL-6, IL-13 and IL-17A are involved in the persistent type 2 immune response in moderate and severe BA. We have identified a pattern of refractory, severe type 2/IL-17A high BA in the real clinical practice.

Implications of prostaglandin D2 and leukotrienes in exhaled breath condensates of asthma

BACKGROUND

Various inflammatory eicosanoid levels in biomaterials from airways of asthma and their associations with clinical parameters remain uncertain. We hypothesized that prostaglandin and leukotriene levels differ between in exhaled breath condensates (EBCs) and in sputum in mild, moderate, and severe levels of asthma and that EBC and sputum eicosanoid levels are associated with indexes of pulmonary function and inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the differences between EBC and sputum eicosanoid levels in healthy participants and patients with asthma with different asthma severity levels.

METHODS

Collected EBC and sputum, as well as pulmonary function, were examined in adult patients with asthma and healthy participants. Exhaled breath condensate prostaglandin D2-methoxime (PGD2-MOX), cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs), leukotriene B4 (LTB4), and thromboxane B2 levels, and some sputum eicosanoid and tryptase levels were measured. Differences in eicosanoid levels among participants and their associations with pulmonary function and tryptase and granulocyte levels in sputum were then evaluated.

RESULTS

Analysis of 94 EBCs and 43 sputa revealed that EBC and sputum PGD2-MOX and CysLT levels were significantly higher in patients with asthma than in healthy participants. Exhaled breath condensate PGD2-MOX, CysLT, and LTB4 levels were significantly higher in patients with severe asthma. Exhaled breath condensate PGD2-MOX level was also significantly correlated with sputum tryptase levels and lower pulmonary function in patients with asthma. Sputum PGD2-MOX and CysLT levels were significantly correlated with the proportion of eosinophils among all cells in sputum in patients with asthma.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that EBC PGD2 levels are associated with impairment of pulmonary function in adults with asthma who have undergone guideline treatment. Exhaled breath condensate or sputum PGD2 and CysLTs may represent severity or airway inflammation in asthma.

Severe asthma in Japan

The characteristic phenotype of severe asthma in Japan seems to be distilled into the following two features: low incidence of obesity and high prevalence of patients with type 2 inflammation. Only 5-7% of Japanese severe asthma patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m², and more than 80% of patients with severe asthma exhibited type 2 inflammation. Although the relationship between obesity and non-type 2 inflammation is complex, the low incidence of obesity might explain the prevalence of type 2 inflammation. Some asthma cohorts in Japan have investigated the roles of type 2 biomarkers extensively, including periostin, to identify a severe phenotype, suggesting the utility of combining biomarkers to identify an exacerbation-prone subgroup. Although the prevalence of severe asthma is comparable to Western countries, the rate of asthma death and disease burden seems to be lower in Japan. These trends might be due to the system of public health insurance for the whole nation, leading to good access to hospital and asthma specialists due to the geographically narrow country. In this review article, we will discuss the definition, epidemiology, comorbidities, biomarkers, specific phenotype, and current treatment for severe asthma in Japan.

Can early intervention in pediatric asthma improve long-term outcomes? A question that needs an answer

OBJECTIVE

Although many children with asthma do not experience persistence into adulthood, recent studies have suggested that poorly controlled asthma in childhood may be associated with significant airflow obstruction in adulthood. However, data regarding disease progression are lacking, and clinicians are not yet able to predict the course of a child's asthma. The goal of this article was to assess the current understanding of childhood asthma treatment and progression and to highlight gaps in information that remain.

DATA SOURCES

Nonsystematic PubMed literature search and authors' expertise.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected at the authors' discretion based on areas of interest in childhood asthma treatment and progression into adulthood.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma in early childhood can potentially have lasting effects on lung development, but it is unclear whether traditional interventions in very young children preserve lung function. Although not all children respond to standard interventions, certain asthma phenotypes have been identified that can help to understand which children may respond to a particular treatment.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should monitor children's asthma control and pulmonary function over time to assess the long-term impact of an intervention and to minimize the effect of uncontrolled asthma, especially exacerbations, on lung development. New biologic therapies have shown promise in treating adults with severe, uncontrolled asthma, and some of these therapies are approved in the United States for children as young as age 6. However, knowledge gaps regarding the efficacy and safety of these treatments in younger children hamper our understanding of their effect on long-term outcomes.