Focal eosinophilic myositis with Charcot-Leyden crystal formation

Eosinophilic mucus diseases

Eosinophilic inflammation is primarily characterized by type 2 immune responses against parasitic organisms. In the contemporary human being especially in developed countries, eosinophilic inflammation is strongly associated with allergic/sterile inflammation, and constitutes an undesired immune reaction. This situation is in stark contrast to neutrophilic inflammation, which is indispensable for the host defense against bacterial infections. Among eosinophilic inflammatory disorders, massive accumulation of eosinophils within mucus is observed in certain cases, and is often linked to the distinctive clinical finding of mucus with high viscosity. Eosinophilic mucus is found in a variety of diseases, including chronic allergic keratoconjunctivitis, chronic rhinosinusitis encompassing allergic fungal sinusitis, eosinophilic otitis media, eosinophilic sialodochitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis, eosinophilic plastic bronchitis, and eosinophilic asthma. In these pathological conditions, chronic inflammation and tissue remodeling coupled with irreversible organ damage due to persistent adhesion of toxic substances and luminal obstruction may impose a significant burden on the body. Eosinophils aggregate in the hyperconcentrated mucus together with cell-derived crystals, macromolecules, and polymers, thereby affecting the biophysical properties of the mucus. This review focuses on the clinically significant challenges of mucus and discusses the consequences of activated eosinophils on the mucosal surface that impact mucus and persistent inflammation.

Idiopathic eosinophilic myositis: a systematic literature review

Eosinophilic myositis belong to the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and are defined by an inflammatory infiltrate composed of eosinophils within the muscle. To date, no consensus exists for diagnosis and care of such patients. The aim of this review was to describe clinical and histological presentation, treatment, and outcome of eosinophilic myositis based on a systematic review of all published histologically proven cases of eosinophilic myositis. A total of 453 records were identified in MEDLINE until November 2020. A total of 69 published cases were identified. The analysis of these allowed the distinction of the 3 previously described pathological subtypes: focal eosinophilic myositis (n = 17); diffuse eosinophilic myositis (n = 36); and eosinophilic perimyositis (n = 16). We propose a simple algorithm for diagnosis and treatment strategy for the care of patient with muscular symptoms and blood eosinophilia. This work also highlights eosinophilic myositis pathogenesis and the need for careful investigations in order to rule out differential diagnoses.

Eosinophil-mediated inflammation in the absence of eosinophilia

The increase of eosinophil levels is a hallmark of type-2 inflammation. Blood eosinophil counts act as a convenient biomarker for asthma phenotyping and the selection of biologics, and they are even used as a prognostic factor for severe coronavirus disease 2019. However, the circulating eosinophil count does not always reflect tissue eosinophilia and vice versa. The mismatch of blood and tissue eosinophilia can be seen in various clinical settings. For example, blood eosinophil levels in patients with acute eosinophilic pneumonia are often within normal range despite the marked symptoms and increased number of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Histological studies using immunostaining for eosinophil granule proteins have revealed the extracellular deposition of granule proteins coincident with pathological conditions, even in the absence of a significant eosinophil infiltrate. The marked deposition of eosinophil granule proteins in tissue is often associated with cytolytic degranulation. Recent studies have indicated that extracellular trap cell death (ETosis) is a major mechanism of cytolysis. Cytolytic ETosis is a total cell degranulation in which cytoplasmic and nuclear contents, including DNA and histones that act as alarmins, are also released. In the present review, eosinophil-mediated inflammation in such mismatch conditions is discussed.

How to detect eosinophil ETosis (EETosis) and extracellular traps

Eosinophils are short-lived and comprise only a small population of circulating leukocytes; however, they play surprisingly multifunctional roles in homeostasis and various diseases including allergy and infection. Recent research has shed light on active cytolytic eosinophil cell death that releases eosinophil extracellular traps (EETs) and total cellular contents, namely eosinophil extracellular trap cell death (EETosis). The pathological contribution of EETosis was made more cogent by recent findings that a classical pathological finding of eosinophilic inflammation, that of Charcot-Leyden crystals, is closely associated with EETosis. Currently no gold standard methods to identify EETosis exist, but “an active eosinophil lysis that releases cell-free granules and net-like chromatin structure” appears to be a common feature of EETosis. In this review, we describe several approaches that visualize EETs/EETosis in clinical samples and in vitro studies using isolated human eosinophils. EETs/EETosis can be observed using simple chemical or fluorescence staining, immunostaining, and electron microscopy, although it is noteworthy that visualization of EETs is greatly changed by sample preparation including the extracellular space of EETotic cells and shear flow. Considering the multiple aspects of biological significance, further study into EETs/EETosis is warranted to give a detailed understanding of the roles played in homeostasis and disease pathogenesis.