Impact of Arrhythmias on Hospitalizations in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on In-Hospital Outcomes of Hospitalizations With Acute Limb Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Therapy

PURPOSE

Studies on outcomes related to endovascular treatment (EVT) in advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among hospitalizations with acute limb ischemia (ALI) are limited.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was quarried from October 2015 to December 2017 to identify the hospitalizations with ALI and undergoing EVT. The study population was subdivided into 3 groups based on their CKD stages: group 1 (No CKD, stage I, stage II), group 2 (CKD stage III, stage IV), and group 3 (CKD stage V and ESRD). The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 51 995 hospitalizations with ALI undergoing EVT were identified. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in group 2 (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 - 1.32, p=0.009) and group 3 (OR = 3.18; 95% CI 2.74-3.69, p<0.0001) compared with group 1. Odds of minor amputation, vascular complication, atherectomy, and blood transfusion were higher among groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1. Group 2 had higher odds of access site hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 3, whereas group 3 had higher odds of major amputation, postprocedural infection, and postoperative hemorrhage compared with groups 1 and 2. Besides, groups 2 and 3 had lower odds of discharge to home compared with group 1. Finally, the length of hospital stay and cost of care was significantly higher with the advancing CKD stages.

CONCLUSION

Advanced CKD stages and ESRD are associated with higher mortality, worse in-hospital outcomes and higher resource utilization among ALI hospitalizations undergoing EVT.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Current guidelines are not clear for the optimum first line treatment of acute limb ischemia, especially in patients with advanced kidney disease as compared to normal/mild kidney disease patients. We found that advanced kidney disease is a significant risk factor for worse in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, patients with acute limb ischemia and advanced kidney disease is associated with significantly higher resource utilization as compared to patients with normal/mild kidney disease. This study suggests shared decision making between treating physician and patients when considering endovascular therapy for the treatment of acute limb ischemia in patients with advanced kidney disease.

Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Review of the Current Literature

Cardiac amyloidosis is the most frequent infiltrative disease caused by the deposition of misfolded proteins in the cardiac tissue, leading to heart failure, brady- and tachyarrhythmia and death. Conduction disorders, atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) significantly impact patient outcomes and demand recognition. However, several issues remain unresolved regarding early diagnosis and optimal management. Extreme bradycardia is the most common cause of arrhythmic death, while fast and sustained VAs can be found even in the early phases of the disease. Risk stratification and the prevention of sudden cardiac death are therefore to be considered in these patients, although the time for defibrillator implantation is still a subject of debate. Moreover, atrial impairment due to amyloid fibrils is associated with an increased risk of AF resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy, as well as recurrent thromboembolic events despite adequate anticoagulation. In the last few years, the aging of the population and progressive improvements in imaging methods have led to increases in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Novel therapies have been developed to improve patients' functional status, quality of life and mortality, without data regarding their effect on arrhythmia prevention. In this review, we consider the latest evidence regarding the arrhythmic risk stratification of cardiac amyloidosis, as well as the available therapeutic strategies.

Atrial electrofunctional predictors of incident atrial fibrillation in cardiac amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is a significant risk factor for heart failure hospitalization and thromboembolic events.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the atrial electrofunctional predictors of incident AF in CA.

METHODS

A multicenter, observational study was conducted in 4 CA referral centers including sinus rhythm patients with light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) CA undergoing electrocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The primary end point was new-onset AF occurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 96 patients (AL-CA, n = 40; ATTR-CA, n = 56) were enrolled. During an 18-month median follow-up (Q1-Q3, 7-29 months), 30 patients (29%) had incident AF. Compared with those without AF, patients with AF were older (79 vs 73 years; P = .001). They more frequently had ATTR (87% vs 45%; P < .001); electrocardiographic interatrial block (IAB), either partial (47% vs 21%; P = .011) or advanced (17% vs 3%; P = .017); and lower left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF; 29% vs 41%; P = .004). Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.059; 95% CI, 1.002-1.118; P = .042), any type of IAB (HR, 2.211; 95% CI, 1.03-4.75; P = .041), and LAEF (HR, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.936-0.998; P = .044) emerged as independent predictors of incident AF. Patients exhibiting any type of IAB, LAEF <40%, and age >78 years showed a cumulative incidence for AF of 40% at 12 months. This risk was significantly higher than that carried by 1 (8.5%) or none (7.6%) of these 3 risk factors.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CA, older age, IAB on 12-lead electrocardiography, and reduced LAEF on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are significant and independent predictors of incident AF. A closer screening for AF is advisable in CA patients carrying these features.

Management of Arrhythmias and Conduction Disorders in Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

Cardiac amyloidosis, a condition characterized by abnormal protein deposition in the heart, leads to restrictive cardiomyopathy and is notably associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias and conduction disorders. This article reviews the current understanding and management strategies for these cardiac complications, with a focus on recent advancements and clinical challenges. The prevalence and impact of atrial arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, are examined, along with considerations for stroke risk and anticoagulation therapy. The article also addresses the complexities of managing rate and rhythm control, outlining the utility and limitations of pharmacological agents and interventions such as catheter ablation. Furthermore, it reviews the challenges in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, including the contentious use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary and secondary prevention. Individualized approaches, considering the unique characteristics of cardiac amyloidosis, are paramount. Continuous research and clinical exploration are essential to refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Conduction system disease in cardiac amyloidosis

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has diverse and deleterious effects on the conductive system. Atrial fibrillation is by far the most common electrophysiological manifestation of CA and is associated with more mortality, morbidity, and hospitalizations. While AF increases the risk of thrombosis regardless of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, the risk of thromboembolism seems to be high even in CA patients without AF. AV Nodal disease is prevalent and may precede the diagnosis of CA. The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias remains disputed, and the role of implantable cardioverter defibrillator devices in CA patients is controversial. Newer therapies targeted against specific types of CA have been developed, but their effects on conductive system disease are not well studied.

Arrhythmias in Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comprehensive Review on Clinical Management and Devices

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease in which misfolded proteins accumulate in the cardiac wall tissue. Heart rhythm disorders in CA, including supraventricular arrhythmias, conduction system disturbances, or ventricular arrhythmias, play a major role in CA morbidity and mortality, and thus require supplementary management. Among them, AF is the most frequent arrhythmia during CA hospitalizations and is associated with significantly higher mortality, while ventricular arrhythmias are also common and are usually associated with poor prognosis. Early diagnosis of potential arrythmias could be performed through ECG, Holter monitoring, and/or electrophysiology study. Clinical management of these patients is quite significant, and it usually includes initiation of amiodarone and/or digoxin in patients with AF, potential electrical cardioversion, or ablation in specific patients with indication, as well as initiation of anticoagulants in all patients, independent of AF and CHADS-VASc score, for potential intracardiac thrombus. Moreover, identification of patients with conduction disorders that could benefit from prophylactic pacemaker implantation and/or CRT as well as identification of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrythmias that could benefit from ICD could both increase the survival rates of these patients and improve their quality of life.

Safety of Catheter Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Amyloidosis

Background Despite the high burden of atrial fibrillation in cardiac amyloidosis (CA), the safety of catheter ablation therapy in CA is not well established. We sought to examine short-term safety outcomes following atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with CA compared with matched patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods and Results Using data from the National Inpatient Sample, we identified all hospitalizations for atrial fibrillation ablation from the fourth quarter of 2015 through 2019. Admissions for CA and DCM were matched in a 1:5 ratio using propensity scores based on the following sociodemographics: age, sex, race or ethnicity, payor, median income, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We compared in-hospital outcomes between both cardiomyopathies. We identified 1395 unweighted hospitalizations (representing 6750 national hospitalizations) for atrial fibrillation ablation, out of which 45 (3.2%) were admissions for CA. Compared with DCM, patients with CA were older (72.9 versus 65.1 years), had a higher burden of prior stroke (20.0% versus 8.6%) and chronic kidney disease (53.3% versus 33.6%), and were less likely to have a prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (4.4% versus 23.0%). We successfully matched 42 CAs to 210 DCM hospitalizations. After matching, there was no difference in total complications (14.3% versus 10.5%, P=0.60), length-of-stay (3.1 versus 2.1 days, P=0.23), home disposition (97.6% versus 96.2%, P=0.65), and total charges ($137 250 versus $133 910, P=0.24). Conclusions In this nationally representative study of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in CA, short-term safety outcomes and complication rates were similar to a propensity score-matched cohort of DCM. Further studies exploring long-term safety outcomes are needed.

Incidence and Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (wtATTR-CM) is characterized by heart failure, conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias. The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly ventricular tachycardias (VTs), in wtATTR-CM is unclear. With the development of targeted therapies and improved overall prognosis, there is an unmet need to identify patients at high risk for VTs who might benefit from ICD therapy.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2022, 72 patients diagnosed with wtATTR-CM were prospectively evaluated for the presence of ventricular arrhythmias using a Holter ECG. VTs were defined as >3 consecutive beats with a heart rate > 100 beats per minute originating from a ventricle.

RESULTS

The incidence of VTs was 44% (n = 32/72) in unselected wtATTR-CM patients. Patients with VT showed significantly more severe left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (septum diameter 21 ± 2.6 vs. 19 ± 3.0 mm, p = 0.006), reduced LV ejection fraction (47 ± 8 vs. 52 ± 8%, p = 0.014) and larger left atria (32 ± 7 vs. 28 ± 6 mm², p = 0.020), but no differences in cardiac markers such as NTproBNP and troponin. In a multivariable model, LV hypertrophy (LV mass indexed, OR = 1.02 [1.00-1.03], p = 0.031), LV end-diastolic diameter (OR = 0.85 [0.74-0.98], p = 0.021) and LV end-systolic diameter (OR = 1.19 [1.03-1.349], p = 0.092) were predictive for VT occurrence with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.76 [0.65-0.87].

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ventricular arrhythmia in wtATTR-CM is high and is associated with an advanced stage of left ventricular disease. Further studies are needed evaluating the role of VTs in predicting sudden cardiac death and the benefit of ICD therapy in wtATTR-CM.

Risk stratification in transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis

Transthyretin related cardiac amyloidosis (TTR-CA) is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy that cause heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, mainly in aging people. Due to the introduction of a non invasive diagnostic algorithm, this disease, previously considered to be rare, is increasingly recognized. The natural history of TTR-CA includes two different stages: a presymptomatic and a symptomatic stage. Due to the availability of new disease-modifying therapies, the need to reach a diagnosis in the first stage has become impelling. While in variant TTR-CA an early identification of the disease may be obtained with a genetic screening in proband's relatives, in the wild-type form it represents a challenging issue. Once the diagnosis has been made, in order to identifying patients with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and death it is necessary to focus on risk stratification. Two prognostic scores have been proposed both based on biomarkers and laboratory findings. However, a multiparametric approach combining information from electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, cardiopulmonary exercise test and cardiac magnetic resonance may be warranted for a more comprehensive risk prediction. In this review, we aim at evaluating a step by step risk stratification, providing a clinical diagnostic and prognostic approach for the management of patients with TTR-CA.

Ethnic/racial differences in risk factors and clinical outcomes among patients with amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac amyloidosis is caused by abnormal extracellular deposition of insoluble fibrils in cardiac tissue. It can be fatal when untreated and is often underdiagnosed. Understanding the ethnic/racial differences in risk factors is critical for early diagnosis and treatment to improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study utilizing the National Inpatient Sample database from 2015 to 2018 using ICD-10-CM codes. The primary variables of interest were race/ethnicity and amyloidosis subtypes, while the primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, and hospital length-of-stay.

RESULTS

Amyloidosis was reported in 0.17% of all hospitalizations (N  =  19,678,415). Of these, 0.09% were non-Hispanic whites, 0.04% were non-Hispanic blacks, and 0.02% were Hispanic. Hospitalizations with ATTR amyloidosis subtype were frequently observed in older individuals and males with coronary artery disease, whereas AL amyloidosis subtype was associated with non-Hispanic whites, congestive heart failure, and longer hospital length of stay. Renal failure was associated with non-Hispanic blacks (adjusted relative risk [RR]  =  1.31, p < 0.001), Hispanics (RR  =  1.08, p  =  0.028) and had an increased risk of mortality. Similarly, the hospital length of stay was longer with non-Hispanic blacks (RR  =  1.19, p < 0.001) and Hispanics (RR  =  1.05, p  =  0.03) compared to non-Hispanic whites. Hispanics had a reduced risk of mortality (RR  =  0.77, p  =  0.028) compared to non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks, and no significant difference in mortality was seen between non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks (RR  =  1.00, p  =  0.963).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight significant ethnic/racial differences in risk factors and outcomes among amyloidosis-related US hospitalizations that can possibly be used for early detection, treatment, and better clinical outcomes.

Racial disparities in ventricular tachycardia in young adults: analysis of national trends

BACKGROUND

In the last two decades, risk factors, prevalence, and mortality due to coronary artery disease in young adults are on the rise. We sought to assess the prevalence, trends, and economic burden of ventricular tachycardia (VT) hospitalizations in young adults (< 45 years), further stratified by race and gender.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was explored for hospitalizations with VT in patients (< 45 years) between 2005 and 2018 and divided among 3 groups of the quadrennial period using validated International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9^th and 10^th revision Clinical Modification (CM) codes. The Pearson chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. We assessed the temporal trends of mortality in VT hospitalizations and trends of VT hospitalization stratified by age, sex, and race by using Joinpoint regression analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality trends. Secondary outcomes were trends of hospital stay in days, cost of care in US dollars, cardiac arrest, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Out of 5,156,326 patients admitted with VT between 2005 and 2018, 309,636 were young adults. Among them, 102,433 were admitted between 2005 and 2009 (mean age 36.1 ± 6.99; 61% male, 58.5% White), 109,591 between 2010 and 2014 (mean age 35.5 ± 7.16; 59% male, 54.2% White), and 97,495 between 2015 and 2018 (mean age 35.4 ± 7.00; 60% male, 52.3% White) (p < 0.07). In the young adults with VT, all-cause mortality was 7.37% from 2005 to 2009, 7.85% from 2010 to 2014 (6.5% relative increase from 2005 to 2009), and 8.98% from 2015 to 2018 (relative increase of 14.4% from 2010 to 2014) (p < 0.0001). Similarly, risk of cardiac arrest was on the rise (6.15% from 2005 to 2009 to 7.77% in 2010-2014 and 9.97% in 2015-2018). Inflation-adjusted cost increased over the years [$12,177 in 2005-2009; $13,249 in 2010-2014; $15,807 in 2015-2018; p < 0.0001)].

CONCLUSIONS

VT hospitalizations and related all-cause mortality, and healthcare utilization costs in young adults are on the rise in the study period. Hospitalization burden related to VT and poor outcomes were more notable for Black adults. Further studies are required for targeted screening and preventative measures in young adults.

Arrhythmic Burden in Cardiac Amyloidosis: What We Know and What We Do Not

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA), caused by the deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils, impairs different cardiac structures, altering not only left ventricle (LV) systo-diastolic function but also atrial function and the conduction system. The consequences of the involvement of the cardiac electrical system deserve more attention, as well as the study of the underlying molecular mechanisms. This is an issue of considerable interest, given the conflicting data on the effectiveness of conventional antiarrhythmic strategies. Therefore, this review aims at summarizing the arrhythmic burden related to CA and the available evidence on antiarrhythmic treatment in this population.

Temporal Trends and Sex Differences in Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Retrospective analysis of 22,015 Admissions from the National Inpatient Sample

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) often goes unrecognized as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). There is paucity of contemporary data evaluating the trends of CA diagnosis and associated sex differences. Adult heart failure hospitalizations were identified from the National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2019. Hospitalizations with heart failure other than HFpEF were excluded. Hospitalizations with a diagnosis of CA were identified. A Linear regression was utilized to calculate the trend of CA diagnosis over time. A multivariate logistic regressions analysis was performed to analyze sex differences. There was an increasing trend of CA from 1.2 to 2.3 per 1000 HFpEF admission in the first quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2019 (P_trend <0.001). In females, as compared to males, there was an increased risk of AIS (6% vs 3%, aOR: 1.68[1.24-2.27], P=0.001) and major bleeding events (10% vs 5%, aOR: 1.97[1.53-2.52], P<0.001). No difference was observed in the in-hospital mortality outcome (8% vs 7%, aOR: 1.2[0.95-1.53], P=0.12) between both groups. Our real-world contemporary analysis showed an increase in CA diagnosis from 2016 to 2019. Despite similar in-hospital mortality, females were associated with higher AIS and major bleeding events rates. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.

What have we learned so far from the sex/gender issue in heart failure? An overview of current evidence

There are important differences in epidemiology, pathophysiology, HF patterns, prognosis, and treatment. Women have a higher incidence of HFpEF due to sex-specific factors (such as anthropometry, role of estrogens, pregnancy-related cardiomyopathies), increased incidence of comorbidities, and gender-specific conditions. Men instead present a predisposition to the development of HFrEF due to a higher incidence of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. However, there are still gaps in the management of women with HF. The poor inclusion of women in clinical trials may have contributed to a lesser understanding of disease behavior than in men. In addition, a full understanding of gender-specific factors that are studied in small populations is lacking in the literature, and only in recent years, studies have increased their focus on this issue. Understanding how society, family, and environment affect the prognosis of HF patients may help clinicians provide more appropriate levels of care. In this overview, we aimed at summarizing all the key available evidence regarding sex/gender differences in heart failure.

Systematic literature review of evidence in amyloid light-chain amyloidosis

Introduction: Treatment of amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, a rare disease with a <5-year lifespan, remains challenging. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to evaluate the current evidence base in AL amyloidosis. Methods: Literature searches on clinical, health-related quality of life, economic and resource use evidence were conducted using the Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases as well as gray literature. Results: This SLR yielded 84 unique studies from: five randomized controlled trials; 54 observational studies; 12 health-related quality of life studies, none with utility values; no economic evaluation studies; and 16 resource use studies, none with indirect costs. Conclusion: This SLR highlights a paucity of published literature relating to randomized controlled trials, utility values, economic evaluations and indirect costs in AL amyloidosis.

Arrhythmias in patients with in-hospital alcohol withdrawal are associated with increased mortality: Insights from 1.5 million hospitalizations for alcohol withdrawal syndrome

Background

Atrial arrhythmias are commonly noted in patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), requiring inpatient admission.

Objective

The burden of arrhythmias and the association with in-hospital outcomes are incompletely defined in patients hospitalized with AWS.

Methods

The nationwide inpatient sample database was accessed from September 2015 to December 2018 to identify hospitalizations for AWS. We studied a cohort of patients with arrhythmias noted during hospitalization using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision billing codes. We compared patient characteristics, outcomes, and hospitalization costs between alcohol withdrawal hospitalizations with and without documented arrhythmias. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression were performed to control confounders and develop odds ratios (OR), respectively.

Results

Among 1,511,155 hospitalization with AWS, 146,825 (9.72%) had concurrent arrhythmias. After PSM, we identified 135,540 cases in each group. Hospitalizations with AWS and concurrent arrhythmias had higher in-hospital mortality (4.19% vs 1.95%, OR 1.76, confidence interval [CI] 1.67–1.85, P < .0001). The most common arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (66.7%). Arrhythmias in AWS were also associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes, including a higher risk of acute heart failure (8.40% vs 4.58%, OR 1.97, CI 1.90–2.05, P < .0001), acute kidney injury (21.32% vs 15.27%, OR 1.39, CI 1.36–1.43, P < .0001), and acute respiratory failure (9.19% vs 5.49%, OR 1.70, CI 1.64–1.76, P < .0001) requiring intubation. The length of hospital stay (6 days vs 4 days P < .0001) and cost of hospital care ($12,615 [$6683–$27,330] vs $7860 [$4482–$15,868], P < .0001) were higher in AWS with arrhythmias.

Conclusion

Arrhythmia in AWS is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and poorer in-hospital outcomes.

Outcomes of Impella compared with intra-aortic balloon pump in ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Background

Despite limited randomized trial data demonstrating clinical efficacy, the utilization of Impella in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) has increased over time.

Methods

We identified 75,769 hospitalizations with STEMI complicated by CS between October 2015 and December 2018 using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. From this cohort, hospitalizations were stratified according to IABP or Impella placement. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were divided into efficacy, safety, and device-related complications. Propensity-score matching was used to account for differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Logistic regression was performed to get the odds ratio and confidence intervals.

Results

Among 75,769 admissions with STEMI and CS, hospitalizations with <18 years old, both IABP and Impella placement, and who underwent ECMO and/or LVAD implantation were excluded. After the exclusion, out of 72,791 admissions, 25,260 (34.70%) hospitalizations received IABP, and 7825 (10.75%) received Impella support. After propensity score-matched analysis, 7345 hospitalizations were included in each group. All-cause in-hospital mortality was higher in the hospitalizations requiring Impella support as compared to IABP (42.10% vs. 31.54%, adjusted OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60-1.84, P < 0.0001). Impella was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital complications and hospitalization cost compared with IABP.

Conclusion

Impella compared with IABP in STEMI patients with CS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and other adverse clinical and procedural outcomes.

The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on hospitalization Outcomes for Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using the National Inpatient Sample Database

BACKGROUND

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been on the rise. However, the excess burden added by AF to the morbidity and mortality of CLL patients especially in the hospitalized setting is undetermined.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was accessed to gather data of hospitalized CLL patients with AF from 2009 to 2018. Propensity-score matching (PSM) and logistic regression model were performed to control for baseline patient factors to match 7265 CLL patient admissions with AF and 7265 CLL patient admissions without AF. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM), while the secondary outcomes included acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), acute heart failure (AHF), acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF), cardiac arrest (CA), cardiogenic shock (CS), stroke, and the total cost of hospitalization.

RESULTS

CLL patients with AF had a higher rate of ACM (6.06% vs 4.47%; odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.61; P =< .001). All other secondary outcomes including ACS, AMI, PCI, AHRF, CA, CS, and stroke were observed at a significantly higher rate in the AF group as well. The median total hospital cost was also higher in the AF group ($9097 vs. $7646; P value < .0001) CONCLUSION: CLL patients with AF are at a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac-related mortality, and stroke. For this population, a multidisciplinary approach should be orchestrated for better management and outcomes.

Increased inpatient mortality in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter with concomitant amyloidosis: Insight from National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2017

Purpose

Using National Inpatient Database (NIS), comparison of clinical outcomes for patients primarily admitted for atrial fibrillation/flutter with and without a secondary diagnosis of amyloidosis was done. Inpatient mortality was the primary outcome and hospital length of stay (LOS), mean total hospital charges, odds of undergoing cardiac ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion, having a secondary discharge diagnosis of heart block, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest were secondary outcomes.

Methods

NIS database of 2016, 2017 was used for only adult hospitalizations with atrial fibrillation/flutter as principal diagnosis with and without amyloidosis as secondary diagnosis using ICD-10 codes. Multivariate logistic with linear regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders.

Results

932,054 hospitalizations were for adult patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of atrial fibrillation/flutter. 830 (0.09%) of these hospitalizations had amyloidosis.

Atrial fibrillation/flutter hospitalizations with co-existing amyloidosis have higher inpatient mortality (4.22% vs 0.88%, AOR: 3.92, 95% CI 1.81–8.51, p = 0.001) and likelihood of having a secondary discharge diagnosis of cardiac arrest (2.40% vs 0.51%, AOR: 4.80, 95% CI 1.89–12.20, p = 0.001) compared to those without amyloidosis.

Conclusions

Hospitalizations of atrial fibrillation/flutter with co-existing amyloidosis have higher inpatient mortality and odds of having a secondary discharge diagnosis of cardiac arrest compared to those without amyloidosis. However, LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing cardiac ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion, having a secondary discharge diagnosis of heart block and cardiogenic shock were similar between both groups.