Standard D2 versus extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: an interim safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial

Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (≥65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72-1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62-1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74-2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75-4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.

Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian, Endometrial, Gastric, and Bladder Cancers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes as it aids in staging, provides prognostic data, and influences the patient's options for adjuvant therapy. However, there is still contention over its potential in treating cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to look into the published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) that have reported the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

Five different electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials.gov, ICTRP, and Embase, were used to conduct a comprehensive search. Original RCTs reporting on the impact of lymphadenectomy on the overall survival in various cancers were included. Information related to the study population, intervention, type of cancer, primary endpoints, and key findings of the study were extracted. Quality assessment of the selected studies was conducted using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Rob 2 for randomized trials.

RESULTS

A total of 1693 citations, with 1511 from PubMed, 80 from the Cochrane Library, 67 from Embase, 18 from ICTRP, and 17 from Clinicaltrials.gov were retrieved. Preliminary screening was performed, and after applying selection criteria, nine articles were included in the final qualitative analysis. The total number of patients was 4231, and the sample size ranged from 70 to 1408. Among these nine studies, four studies were on genital cancers (two ovarian cancers, one endometrial cancer, and one cervical cancer); four on digestive cancers (advanced gastric cancers); and one on urinary cancer (advanced bladder cancer). These studies reported that para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve overall survival and disease-free survival in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers, advanced gastric, and bladder cancers. All of the studies had a low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not advised in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers with low risks, advanced gastric cancers, and bladder cancers. SNB could be an alternative to lymphadenectomy for ovarian cancer in the future. Clinicians should inform patients regarding the benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of survival and the potential risks associated with it.

A snapshot on current approaches to lymphadenectomy in liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results from an international survey

The use of lymphadenectomy (LND) during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still debated, leading to differing practices in different centers and countries. The aim of this study was to assess such differences. A survey on LND for ICC was distributed to the members of the International Hepato-PancreatoBiliary Association (IHPBA) and the Italian Chapter of IHPBA (AICEP). Two-hundred thirty-four surgeons completed the survey (88% males; median age 46 years). Preoperative nodal staging was deemed mandatory/very important by 65%. Adequate LND was defined as hepatoduodenal ligament LND by 33%, LND at specific nodal stations by 28% and retrieval of > 5 nodes by 28%. The decision to perform LND was influenced by comorbidities (48%), chronic liver disease (38%) and satellitosis (32%). Most participants modify perioperative management in case of clinically positive nodes, 50% stating they would give neoadjuvant therapy. The role of LND in clinically node negative disease was adequate staging for 88%, survival benefit for 50.5% and clinical trials eligibility for 18.5%. Our survey confirms heterogeneity in the evaluation of role and extent of LND for ICC, how this relates to subjective perception of importance of LND, and need of a systematic approach in this area.

Optimal lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a narrative review

The management of gastric cancer has long been debated, particularly the extent of lymph node (LN) dissection required during curative surgery. LN invasion stands out as the most critical prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Historically, Japanese academic societies were the pioneers in defining a classification system for regional gastric LN stations, numbering them from 1 to 16. This classification was later used to differentiate between different types of LN dissection, such as D1, D2 and D3. However, these definitions were often considered too complex to be universally adopted, resulting in wide variations in recommendations from one country to another and making it difficult to compare published studies. In addition, the optimal extent of LN dissection remains uncertain, with initially recommended dissections being extensive but associated with significant morbidity without a clear survival benefit. The aim of this review is to make a case for extending LN dissection based on the existing literature, which includes a comprehensive examination of the current definitions of lymphadenectomy and an analysis of the results of all randomised controlled trials evaluating morbidity, mortality and long-term survival associated with different types of LN dissection. Finally, we provide a summary of the various recommendations issued by organizations such as the Japanese Gastric Research Association, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the French National Thesaurus of Digestive Oncology.

Laparoscopic D2+ lymph node dissection in patients with obesity and gastric cancer: A retrospective study

D2 lymph node dissection is widely used in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and its efficacy and safety are known for patients with obesity. Currently, D2+ lymph node dissection is also applied to certain patients with gastric cancer of later stages. Due to the high difficulty of D2+ surgery, it is more challenging to perform on patients with obesity. There is currently limited research on the efficacy and safety of D2+ surgery in obese patients with gastric cancer. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer admitted to a single gastroenterology department. Patients with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were included in the study. A total of 149 patients were selected as the research subjects and divided into two groups. The observation group comprised 74 patients who underwent D2+ lymph node dissection, while the control group comprised 75 patients who underwent standard D2 lymph node dissection. The surgical performance, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. The results showed that the rates of conversion to open surgery in the D2+ and D2 groups were 5.4% (4/74) and 2.7% (2/75), respectively, and were not significantly different. The duration of surgery in the D2+ group (282.55±23.02 min) was significantly longer than that in the D2 group (271.45±20.05 min). The mean number of lymph node dissections in the D2+ group was 28.57±7.19, which was significantly higher than that in the D2 group (25.29±6.41). No statistically significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus, postoperative hospitalization days, total hospitalization expenses or postoperative complications was detected between the two groups. There were no deaths in either group within the 30-day perioperative period. In addition, there was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival rate between the two groups, while the 5-year overall survival rate of the D2+ group was significantly higher than that of the D2 group. For obese patients with gastric cancer, D2+ surgery may increase the duration of surgery and slightly increase intraoperative blood loss compared with standard D2 radical surgery, but does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Moreover, D2+ surgery increases the number of lymph node dissections and improves the 5-year survival rate of patients. Therefore, it may be concluded that laparoscopic D2+ lymph node dissection is safe and feasible for obese patients with gastric cancer.

Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Gastric cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in its treatment. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach-D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence by conducting a comprehensive literature review and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. The analysis includes studies, clinical trials, and systematic reviews that assess survival outcomes, morbidity, and quality of life. The selected studies revealed different outcomes associated with D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy, including lymph node harvest, disease control, recurrence rates, and overall survival. Postoperative complications also varied between the two techniques. These findings highlight the complex considerations involved in selecting the most suitable lymphadenectomy approach for individual patients. Therefore, the decision requires an individualized assessment that considers the potential benefits and risks of D1 and D2 techniques. A collaborative approach involving interdisciplinary teams is crucial for developing personalized treatment plans that optimize both oncological outcomes and postoperative quality of life.

Preoperative chemotherapy combined with para-aortic lymph node dissection has clinical value in the treatment of gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastases

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastases often occur in advanced gastric cancer, with some patients presenting with metastases in the para-aortic lymph nodes. There are persistent Controversies about the benefit of para-aortic lymph node dissection (PAND). Our purpose is to probe whether PAND following preoperative chemotherapy had any clinical significance in individuals with PALNs in gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 86 gastric cancer patients (40 in the D2 + PAND group and 46 in the D2 group) who attended the abdominal surgery department of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between September 1, 2008, and July 30, 2018.

RESULTS

In the D2 + PAND group (40 cases), the average number of lymph nodes cleared per case was 4.3 in group 16 (16a2, 16b1), and the postoperative pathology confirmed lymph node positivity in 16 cases, with a metastasis rate of 40%. The median overall survival times were 63 and 34 months for the patients in the D2 + PAND group and D2 group, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) compared to the D2 group (D2 + PAND 69.1% vs. D2 50%, P = 0.012) and a statistically significant difference in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (D2 + PAND 69.6% vs. D2 38.3%, P = 0.007). Lymph node dissection extent and recurrence of para-aortic lymph nodes were independent prognostic variables for the patients. The recurrence rate was reduced in the D2 + PAND group compared to the D2 group (D2 + PAND 7.5% vs. D2 26.1%, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with gastric cancer whose imaging suggests metastasis in the para-aortic lymph nodes, preoperative chemotherapy combined with PAND is an effective and safe treatment that may benefit patient survival.

Patterns of care and outcomes for gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer in an Australian population

BACKGROUND

A single state-wide upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer video-linked multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting guides management and evidence-based care for all newly diagnosed upper GI cancer patients in South Australia. This study determined the patterns of care and outcomes for patients diagnosed with gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancers.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and GOJ (Siewert III) cancer between June 2012 and June 2016 were included. Patient demographics, cancer stage, histology, diagnostic modalities and treatment data was analysed from a prospective database. Stage-specific survival outcomes were determined and analysed for each treatment modality.

RESULTS

The study included 218 patients and at diagnosis 132 (61%) patients had stage I-III and 86 (39%) patients had stage IV disease. One hundred and ninety-five (89%) patients had gastric cancer and 23 (11%) had GOJ cancer (Siewert III). One hundred and nine (50%) patients underwent surgery, with 92% R0 resection rate. Forty-six patients received perioperative chemotherapy and 111 (51%) patients received palliative intent treatment. Median overall survival for stage II, III and IV cancers was 57.6 (95% CI 57.6-NR), 22.8 (95% CI 20.4-43.2), and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.8-8.4) respectively (p < 0.001). Median overall survival for patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy and surgery was not reached as compared to 44.4 months (95% CI 28.8-NR) for patients who underwent surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcomes for patients with gastric and GOJ cancer managed across South Australia met contemporary evidence-based practice. However, as most patients continue to present with late-stage disease, longer-term survival remains poor.

D2 vs D2 Plus Para-aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Objectives

Gastric cancer is a common malignancy worldwide. Effective treatment by interdisciplinary cooperation is important, and surgery still plays an important role.

Material and Methods

In a ten-year period, 355 patients were diagnosed to have gastric cancer. One hundred and sixty-two patients with a median (range) age of 58 (23-83) years were eligible for the study. There were 107 patients in D2 and 55 patients in D2 lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection group. The two groups were compared in terms of complications, morbidity, mortality and long-term survival.

Results

Length of stay was 12 (8-34) days for D2 and 14 (8-42) days for D2 plus PALND. Total number of operative mortality was 8/162 (5%), and it was not different between the groups. Twenty patients (18%) had complications in D2 group and 9 (17%) patients in D2 plus PALND group. Overall survival was also similar between the groups, but patients with T3-T4 tumors, patients with stage IIIA and IIIB disease had better survival with D2 plus PALN dissection. We found that the depth of invasion, PLN, ratio (PLN/TLN), stage and LND were all prognostic variables.

Conclusion

This study showed that D2 plus PALN dissection for advanced gastric cancer can be performed as safely as a standard D2 dissection by experienced surgeons without increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality. D2 plus PALN dissection should be preferred in the advanced stage of the disease (IIIA-IIIB) as it increases the rate of survival.

[Distal subtotal gastrectomy and gastreectomy in surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) devoted to distal subtotal gastrectomy and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with distal gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RCTs were searched in the electronic library, the Cochrane Community database, and PubMed database. A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane Community experts (Higgins et al. 2019). Mathematical calculations of a meta-analysis were made using RevMan 5.3 software package. Statistical criteria were calculated for relative risk (RR), hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and significance level (p).

RESULTS

Seven primary RCTs were selected. A total number of 1463 surgical interventions with D2 lymphadenectomy were observed (805 patients underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy, 658 - gastrectomy). Postoperative mortality is significantly higher (6.5% and 2.6%) after gastrectomy compared to subtotal distal gastrectomy (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.34-3.64, I² 0%, fixed effect model). Postoperative complications are also significantly more common (28% and 14%) after gastrectomy (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.16-2.55, I² heterogeneity 49%, random effect model). Differences in overall five-year survival after gastrectomy and subtotal distal resection (51.6% and 60.8%) are insignificant (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.45-1.22, I² 90%, random effect model, general reverse inversion).

CONCLUSION

The choice of distal subtotal gastrectomy and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with distal gastric cancer is not regulated by evidence-based medicine. The boundaries of minimal surgical clearance from the tumor edge vary from 2.5 cm to 6 cm. An updated meta-analysis shows that postoperative mortality and morbidity are significantly higher after gastrectomy compared to distal subtotal gastrectomy while overall 5-year survival is similar.

Advances in para-aortic nodal dissection in gastric cancer surgery: A review of research progress over the last decade

Approximately 17%-40% of para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis occurs in patients with advanced gastric cancer. As the third tier of lymphatic drainage of the stomach and the final station in front of the systemic circulation, PAN infiltration is defined as distant metastasis and plays a key role in the evaluation of the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer. Many clinical factors including tumor size ≥ 5 cm, pT3 or pT4 depth of tumor invasion, pN2 and pN3 stages, the macroscopic type of Borrmann III/IV, and the diffuse/mixed Lauren classification are indicators of PAN metastasis. Whether PAN dissection (PAND) should be performed on patients with or without the macroscopic PAN invasion remains unascertained, regardless of the numerous retrospective comparative studies reported on the improved prognosis over D2 alone. Another paradoxical result from many other studies showed no significant difference in the overall survival between these two lymphadenectomies. A phase II trial launched by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group indicated that two or three courses of S-1 and cisplatin preoperatively followed by radical surgery with D2 + PAND and postoperative S-1 is the current standard strategy for the treatment of patients with extensive lymph node metastasis, and this regimen could be substituted by a promising strategy with effective combination chemotherapy or suitable chemotherapy duration. This review focuses on the advances in radical gastrectomy plus PAND with or without chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

What is the Role of Nodal Ratio as a Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Nowadays? Comparison with New TNM Staging System and Analysis According to the Number of Resected Nodes

Nodal ratio (NR) has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of nodal ratio comparing it with the new TNM (2010) classification. One hundred forty-two patients were submitted to potentially curative gastrectomy for cancer. Patients with low performance status underwent D1.5 lymphadenectomy, whereas the other patients underwent D2–D2.5 lymphadenectomy. Nodal staging was classified according to 2010 International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival, stratified for nodal classes and nodal status. Total gastrectomy was performed in 39 per cent of cases and distal gastrectomy in 61 per cent. Mean number of resected nodes was 25.5. Whereas N status was strictly related to the number of resected nodes, the NR was independent from the extension of the lymphadenectomy. Overall five-year survival was 81 per cent for N0 patients, 72 per cent for N1, and 26 and 23 per cent for N2 and N3, respectively. Patients with NR0 had 81 per cent five-year survival, whereas NR1 67 per cent, NR2 51 per cent, and NR3 22 per cent. NR seems to be a simple method to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer; unlike N status, it is independent from the number of resected nodes, and therefore it is particularly useful in case of inadequate lymphadenectomy.

Prognostic impact of D2-plus lymphadenectomy and optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric antral carcinoma: Propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic impact of D2-plus lymphadenectomy including the posterior (No. 8p, No. 12b/p, No. 13, and No. 14v), and para-aortic (No. 16a2, and No. 16b1) lymph nodes (LNs) in subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric antral carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 203 patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) located in the antrum, who underwent R0 gastrectomy with D2 or D2-plus lymphadenectomy between January 2003 and December 2011 were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to reduce the strength of the confounding factors to accurately evaluate prognoses. The therapeutic value index (TVI) was calculate to evaluate the survival benefit of dissecting each LN station.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients with D2-plus lymphadenectomy, 21 (20.59%) were pathologically identified as having LN metastases beyond the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy. After matching, the overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the D2-plus than the D2 group (P=0.030). In the multivariate survival analysis, D2-plus lymphadenectomy (hazard ratio, 0.516; P=0.006) was confirmed to significantly improve the survival rate. In the logistic regression analysis, pN stage [odds ratio (OR), 2.533; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.368-4.691; P=0.003] and extent of LNs metastasis (OR, 5.965; 95% CI, 1.335-26.650; P=0.019) were identified as independent risk factors for LN metastases beyond the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy. The TVI of patient with metastasis to LNs station was 7.1 (No. 8p), 5.7 (No. 12p), 5.1 (No. 13), and 7.1 (both No. 16a2 and No. 16b1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

D2-plus lymphadenectomy may improve the prognoses of some patients with advanced GC located in the antrum, especially for No. 8p, No. 12b, No. 13, and No. 16.

In Patients with Localized and Resectable Gastric Cancer, What is the Optimal Extent of Lymph Node Dissection-D1 Versus D2 Versus D3?

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer, the debate over the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy continues.

METHOD

A review of the classification, rationale for, and boundaries of lymphadenectomy is presented. A review of the available literature comparing D1 versus D2 versus D3 lymphadenectomy was performed and included randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative and non-comparative studies.

RESULTS

Earlier studies demonstrated increased morbidity with D2 compared with D1 lymphadenectomy, with no significant survival benefit. More recent studies have demonstrated survival benefit of a pancreas and spleen-sparing D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced, node-positive tumors. Para-aortic/D3 dissections contribute to increased morbidity, with no survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma, a D2 lymph node dissection preserving the pancreas and spleen should be considered standard for optimal staging and treatment, provided it is performed by surgeons with sufficient expertise. Extended lymph node dissections beyond D2 should not be routinely performed as it has been shown to have increased morbidity, with no improvement in outcomes. While systemic chemotherapy should be considered standard in patients undergoing D2 lymphadenectomy, the role of adjuvant radiation continues to evolve.

Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group has recently conducted large scale clinical trials with findings that have revealed pivotal strategies for the treatment of resectable gastric cancer surgery. These findings include the fact that D3 lymphadenectomy does not improve survival rates when compared to D2 lymphadenectomy, and it is not recommended for resectable gastric cancer. Also, a transhiatal approach is recommended, instead of the left thoraco-abdominal approach, for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction or gastric cardia which has invaded ≤ 3 cm of the esophagus. Gastrectomy with splenectomy and bursectomy had been recommended as a part of the D2 lymphadenectomy. However, the results of the recent clinical trials revealed that splenectomy should be avoided in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer and that bursectomy should be avoided in gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer. Both splenectomy and bursectomy were found to be unable to improve survival, but instead increased operative morbidity. These trials revealed that the above-mentioned invasive and aggressive procedures did not provide sufficient survival benefits and that gastric cancer surgery may be trending from an "invasive to less invasive" and "aggressive to more conservative" approach.

Advanced gastric cancer: the value of surgery

Gastric cancer is a common disease with high mortality. The definition of advanced gastric cancer is still debated. Radical surgery associated to appropriate systemic and intra-abdominal chemotherapy is the gold standard treatment. In presence of peritoneal carcinosis, reaching a complete cytoreduction is the key to achieve long-term survival. Adequate lymphadenectomy is also fundamental. Conversion therapy could be applied to selected IV stage patients. No definitive evidences exist regarding the oncological and surgical superiority of mini-invasive approaches over the classical open techniques.

Reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The development of clinical guidelines for the surgical management of gastric cancer should be based on robust evidence from well-designed trials. Being able to reliably compare and combine the outcomes of these trials is a key factor in this process.

OBJECTIVES

To examine variation in outcome reporting by surgical trials for gastric cancer and to identify outcomes for prioritisation in an international consensus study to develop a core outcome set in this field.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic literature searches (Evidence Based Medicine, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP) and a review of study protocols of randomised controlled trials, published between 1996 and 2016.

INTERVENTION

Therapeutic surgical interventions for gastric cancer. Outcomes were listed verbatim, categorised into groups (outcome themes) and examined for definitions and measurement instruments.

RESULTS

Of 1919 abstracts screened, 32 trials (9073 participants) were identified. A total of 749 outcomes were reported of which 96 (13%) were accompanied by an attempted definition. No single outcome was reported by all trials. 'Adverse events' was the most frequently reported 'outcome theme' in which 240 unique terms were described. 12 trials (38%) classified complications according to severity, with 5 (16%) using a formal classification system (Clavien-Dindo or Accordion scale). Of 27 trials which described 'short-term' mortality, 15 (47%) used one of five different definitions. 6 out of the 32 trials (19%) described 'patient-reported outcomes'.

CONCLUSION

Reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials is inconsistent. A consensus approach to develop a minimum set of well-defined, standardised outcomes to be used by all future trials examining therapeutic surgical interventions for gastric cancer is needed. This should consider the views of all key stakeholders, including patients.

Is There Any Role for D3 Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer?

Although D2 constitutes the level of lymph node dissection which most surgical associations endorse in their treatment guidelines for gastric cancer more extended D3 dissection has also been attempted to improve oncologic outcomes. Existing literature pertinent with the provisional therapeutic impact of D3 lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric cancer is studied in this mini review. Seven non-randomized comparisons, three randomized trials and five meta-analyses, almost exclusively of Asian origin, were identified and examined. D3 compared to D2 lymphadenectomy consistently and significantly proved to be associated with a “heavier” iatrogenic surgical trauma translated to more blood loss, prolonged operative time, higher relaparotomy rates and post-procedural surgical and non-surgical morbidity. Oddly mortality in most of these series did not reach statistical significance a fact probably attributed to Asian surgical expertise and/or methodologic drawbacks. All existing evidence and their meta-analyses, including a well-designed RCT from Japan (JCOG), failed to support a clear overall survival benefit linked to D3 dissection thus excluding the procedure from current treatment algorithms. The Italian GC research group, analyzing their database, proposed tumor histology, macroscopic type, size and location as selection criteria for D3 dissection provided surgical expertise is available. Recently, a phase II clinical trial from Japan reported a 3 -year survival rate of 59% in patients with clinically involved para-aortic nodes treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by D3 lymphadenectomy, rekindled the issue. Future multicenter randomized trials should test the extend and after effect of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer combined with modern chemotherapeutic agents in multimodal treatments.

Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer; update 2017

The "Polish Research on Gastric Cancer" project has been continued since 1986. The main aim of this project, which is a multicenter and interdisciplinary research, is enhancing the treatment results of gastric cancer patients by developing and promoting the use of optimal methods for diagnosis and treatment, both surgical as well as combined. One of the more important achievements of the project is the development and publication of a document named "Polish Consensus on Treatment of Patients with Gastric Cancer", whose first version was published in 1998. Following versions were updated adequately to changing trends in the proceedings in patients with gastric cancer. A scientific symposium on "Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer - update 2016" was held in 3-4 June 2016 in Cracow. During the symposium a panel session was held during which all authors publicly presented the Consensus assumptions to be discussed further. Moreover, the already mentioned session was preceded by a correspondence as well as a working meeting in order to consolidate the position. It has to be underlined that the directions and guidelines included in the Consensus are not the arbitrarily assumed rules of conduct in a legal aspect and as such every doctor/team of doctors is entitled to make different decisions as long as they are beneficial to a patient with gastric cancer. The Consensus discusses as follows: a) recommended qualifications (stage of advancement, pathological, lymph node topography and the extent of lymphadenectomy, division of cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), b) rules for diagnostics including recommendations regarding endoscopic examination and clinical evaluation of the advancement stage, c) recommendations regarding surgical treatment (extent of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, tactics of proceedings in cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), d) recommendations regarding combined treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, e) place of endoscopic and less invasive surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer. This publication is a summary of the arrangements made in the panel session during the abovementioned scientific symposium in Cracow in 2016.

Evaluation of rational extent lymphadenectomy for local advanced gastric cancer

Based upon studies from randomized clinical trials, the extended (D2) lymph node dissection is now recommended as a standard procedure for local advanced gastric cancer worldwide. However, the rational extent lymphadenectomy for local advanced gastric cancer has remained a topic of debate in the past decades. Due to the limitation of low metastatic rate in para-aortic nodes (PAN) in JCOG9501, the clinical benefit of D2+ para-aortic nodal dissection (PAND) for patients with stage T4 and/or stage N3 disease, which is very common in China and other countries except Japan and Korea, cannot be determined. Furthermore, the role of splenectomy for complete resection of No.10 and No.11 nodes has been controversial, and however, the final results from the randomized trial of JCOG0110 have yet to be completed. Gastric cancer with the No.14 and No.13 lymph node metastasis is defined as M1 stage in the current version of the Japanese classification. We propose that D2+No.14v and +No.13 lymphadenectomy may be an option in a potentially curative gastrectomy for tumors with apparent metastasis to the No.6 nodes or infiltrate to duodenum. The examined lymph node and extranodal metastasis are significantly associated with the survival of gastric cancer patients.

Alternative staging of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer

The TNM pN stage based on the number of metastatic lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Many studies have highlighted the phenomenon of stage migration and problems in comparing groups of patients with different numbers of total lymph nodes harvested within TNM staging. The current version of UICC/AJCC and JGCA TNM classifications postulates a minimal number of 16 lymph nodes as the base for N stage determination. Alternative systems such as lymph node ratio (LNR), positive to negative lymph node ratio (PNLNR), and LOGODDS (or LODDS), were implemented to increase the quality of LN assessment. These methods have reached the background in the literature, but to date no standard approach according to the cut-offs for the stages has been implemented. LOGODDS is the method that most reflects the number of harvested lymph nodes. The rationale for alternative staging methods, their correlations, and limitations are presented.

Lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: Contentious issues

The stomach is the sixth most common cause of cancer worldwide. Surgery is an important component of the multi-modality treatment of the gastric cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy has been a controversial issue in the surgical management of gastric cancer. The East-Asian surgeons believe that quality-controlled extended lymphadenectomy resulting in better loco-regional control leads to survival benefit in the gastric cancer; contrary to that, many western surgeons believe that extended lymphadenectomy adds to only postoperative morbidity and mortality without significantly enhancing the overall survival. We present a comprehensive review of the lymphadenectomy in the gastric cancer based on the previously published randomized controlled trials.

The clinical significance of para-aortic nodal dissection for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Advanced gastric cancer with the risk of extensive nodal involvement has a poor prognosis even after radical surgery. We aimed to comprehensively review the clinical significance of extended radical dissection.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1999, 232 patients underwent radical gastrectomy with D2 plus para-aortic lymph node dissection at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo. We analyzed the short-term surgical and long-term oncological outcomes of these operations.

RESULTS

Major complications occurred in 34 patients (14.7%). Median operation time was 325 min (range: 182-555) and median blood loss was 715 ml (range: 95-4457). There were 2 (0.9%) hospital deaths. Nodal involvement of the para-aortic area was seen in 33 patients (14.2%). The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates in patients with para-aortic node involvement were 21.2 and 15.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of patients with para-aortic node involvement revealed advanced age and metastasis in the interaorticocaval lymph nodes above the left renal vein to be independent risk factors impacting overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

PAN dissection has limited applicability and effectiveness to the patients with advanced gastric cancer. Above all, advanced age and metastasis in the interaorticocaval lymph nodes above the left renal vein are significant poor prognostic factor even after radical resection.

A pilot study of an individualized comprehensive treatment for advanced gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis

Background

The incidence of the para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALM) in patients with advanced gastric cancer is 6 to 33 %. The prognosis is poor and the 5-year survival rate is only 12 to 23 % after gastrectomy with super-extended lymph node dissection. We applied an individualized comprehensive treatment for affected patients including neoadjuvant chemotherapy via intra-arterial and intravenous administration, surgery and radiotherapy, to investigate the safety and prognostic value.

Methods

Between January 2005 and December 2010, 47 advanced gastric cancer patients with PALM received 5-Fu (370 mg/m²) and leucovorin (200 mg/m²) intravenously on days 1–5, and intra-arterial infusion of etoposide (80 mg/m²) and oxaliplatin (80 mg/m²) on days 6 and 20, repeated 2 cycles. Patients achieved PR or CR of the para-aortic lymph node (PAL) were performed D2 dissection, followed by 6 cycles chemotherapy with XELOX regimen, oxaliplatin (130 mg/m²) on day 1 and xeloda (1000 mg/m²) on days 1 to 14 of a 28-day cycle, and radiotherapy to the region of PALM.

Results

Forty-six patients completed 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The overall response rate of the primary tumor was 80.4 % (37/46). The response rate of PAL was 76.1 % (35/46). Thirty-two patients underwent D2 dissection and six cases achieved pathological complete response (pCR). The toxicity profile was well tolerable and there was no treatment-related death. The median survival time for all patients was 23 months, and for nonsurgical and surgical patients were 12 and 29 months (p < 0.001), respectively. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rate was 70.96, 43.27 and 35.48 % for all patients, and for surgical patients was 96.875, 68.75, and 40.63 %.

Conclusion

Advanced gastric cancer patients with PALM can obtain a survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, subsequent surgery and radiotherapy.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-TRC-12002046.

Prognostic significance of distal subtotal gastrectomy with standard D2 and extended D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer

This study was conducted to investigate prognosis and survival of patients undergoing distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 and D2+ lymphadenectomy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Overall survival rates of 416 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer were compared between D2 and D2+ lymphadenectomy. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis was used to identify significant prognostic factors correlated with LN metastasis and prognosis. Univariate analysis identified tumor size, lymphatic vessel invasion, pT stage, pN stage, TNM stage, locoregional recurrence, and distant recurrence, to significantly correlate with prognosis; Tumor size, LVI, and pT stage were identified as independent factors correlating with LN metastasis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, pT stage, pN stage, locoregional recurrence, and distant recurrence were independent prognostic factors; Tumor size and pT stage were independent prognostic factors predicting LN metastasis. When comparing 5-year survival rates of patients who underwent D2 and D2+ lymphadenectomy, as stratified by pT stage and pN stage, a significant difference was found in pN3 patients, but not for pT2–4 and pN0–2 patients, or the patient cohort as a whole. In conclusion, D2 lymphadenectomy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing distal subtotal gastrectomy was recommended, especially in eastern Asia.

Extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach

BACKGROUND

The impact of lymphadenectomy extent on the survival of patients with primary resectable gastric carcinoma is debated.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence on the impact of the three main types of progressively more extended lymph node dissection (that is, D1, D2 and D3 lymphadenectomy) on the clinical outcome of patients with primary resectable carcinoma of the stomach. The primary objective was to assess the impact of lymphadenectomy extent on survival (overall survival [OS], disease specific survival [DSS] and disease free survival [DFS]). The secondary aim was to assess the impact of lymphadenectomy on post-operative mortality.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE until 2001, including references from relevant articles and conference proceedings. We also contacted known researchers in the field. For the updated review, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 2001 to February 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the three main types of lymph node dissection (i.e., D1, D2 and D3 lymphadenectomy) in patients with primary non-metastatic resectable carcinoma of the stomach.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. Hazard ratios (HR) and relative risks (RR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure differences in survival and mortality rates between trial arms, respectively. Potential sources of between-study heterogeneity were investigated by means of subgroup and sensitivity analyses. The same two authors independently assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies according to the standards of the Cochrane Collaboration and the quality of the overall evidence based on the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight RCTs (enrolling 2515 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Three RCTs (all performed in Asian countries) compared D3 with D2 lymphadenectomy: data suggested no significant difference in OS between these two types of lymph node dissection (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21), with no significant difference in postoperative mortality (RR 1.67, 95% CI 0.41 to 6.73). Data for DFS were available only from one trial and for no trial were DSS data available. Five RCTs (n = 3 European; n = 2 Asian) compared D2 to D1 lymphadenectomy: OS (n = 5; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and DFS (n=3; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.07) findings suggested no significant difference between these two types of lymph node dissection. In contrast, D2 lymphadenectomy was associated with a significantly better DSS compared to D1 lymphadenectomy (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.92), the quality of the body of evidence being moderate; however, D2 lymphadenectomy was also associated with a higher postoperative mortality rate (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.04).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

D2 lymphadenectomy can improve DSS in patients with resectable carcinoma of the stomach, although the increased incidence of postoperative mortality reduces its therapeutic benefit.

Lymphadenectomy extent and survival of patients with gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event data from randomized trials

BACKGROUND

The extent of lymph node dissection in patients with resectable non-metastatic primary carcinoma of the stomach is still a controversial matter of debate, with special regard to its effect on survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the three main types of lymphadenectomy (D1, D2, and D3) for gastric cancer. Hazard ratio (HR) was considered the effect measure for both overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The quality of the available evidence was assessed using the GRADE system.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs enrolling 2515 patients were eligible. The meta-analysis of four RCTs (n=1599) showed a significant impact of D2 versus D1 lymphadenectomy on DSS (summary HR=0.807, CI: 0.705-0.924, P=0.002), the corresponding number-to-treat being equal to ten. This effect remained clinically valuable even after adjustment for postoperative mortality. However, the quality of evidence was graded as moderate due to inconsistency issues. When OS and DFS were considered, the meta-analysis of respectively five (n=1653) and three RCTs (n=1332) found no significant difference between D2 and D1 lymph node dissection (summary HR=0.911, CI: 0.708-1.172, P=0.471, and summary HR=0.946, CI: 0.840-1.066, P=0.366, respectively). However, at subgroup analysis D2 type resulted superior to D1 type lymphadenectomy in terms of OS considering the two RCTs carried out in Eastern countries (summary HR=0.627, CI: 0.396-0.994, P=0.047). As regards the D3 vs D2 comparison, the meta-analysis of the three available RCTs (n=862) showed no significant impact of more extended lymphadenectomy on OS (summary HR=0.990, CI: 0.814-1.205, P=0.924).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the superiority of D2 versus D1 lymphadenectomy in terms of survival benefit. However, this advantage is mainly limited to DSS, the level of evidence is moderate, and the interaction with other factors affecting patient survival (such as complementary medical therapy) remains to be elucidated.

[Spleen-preserving D2 lymphodissection in gastrectomy]

AIM

To analyze immediate and remote results of surgical treatment of 480 patients with gastric cancer who underwent total gastrectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study group included 371 patients who had spleen-preserving D2 lymphodissection during gastrectomy and control group consisted of 109 patients after D2 lymphodissection with splenectomy. Duration of surgery was 183.7±33.8 and 184.1±30.9 min in study and control groups respectively (p=0.72), blood loss - 330.2±33.7 and 351.8±28.8 ml (p=0.0001), incidence of postoperative complications - 6.7% (25 cases) and 4.6% (5 cases) respectively (p=0.5), mortality rate - 2.7% and 0.9% respectively (p=0.46). Number of excised regional lymph nodes of groups 10 and 11 was in most patients of the study group - 5.8 and 5.5 (p=0.92). Metastases in splenic hilus lymph nodes were diagnosed in 28 (7.5%) and 9 (8.2%) patients of the study and control groups respectively (p=0.30), metastases in lymph nodes along splenic vessels - in 24 (6.5%) and 7 (6.4%) patients respectively (p=0.90).

RESULTS

5-year survival in the study group was 40.3±3.0%, average life expectancy - 3.4±3.3 years, in the control groups - 33.1±5.6% and 2.7±2.5 years respectively. It was concluded that spleen-preserving D2 lymphodissection decreases incidence of postoperative complications and has similar drastic nature as standard lymphodissection with splenectomy.

Gastric adenocarcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a borderline resectable cancer?

Dissection of the para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) had once been enthusiastically explored at dedicated centers throughout Japan. Reflecting the results of a randomized trial, however, the current standard surgery for advanced resectable gastric cancer does not include systematic dissection of the PAN. Gastric cancer with PAN metastases, currently considered distant metastases, is classified as Stage IV, and according to the algorithm of the Japanese guidelines, is not indicated for surgery with curative intent. Historical data indicates, however, that a certain proportion of long-term survivors can be introduced among patients with PAN metastasis through D2 + PAN dissection. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group launched a series of phase II trials exploring a strategy employing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by D2 + PAN dissection for patients radiologically diagnosed to harbor metastases to the PAN. The campaign was successful, with 57% of these patients surviving for 5 years after two cycles of neoadjuvant S-1/CDDP followed by surgery. This strategy is now the tentative standard, mentioned in the 4th version of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines as one of the current clinical questions, and could be replaced by a more powerful combination chemotherapy or treatment employing more or longer cycles of chemotherapy in the future. The relevance of the strategy consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by D2 + PAN dissection and its fundamental difference from the concept of conversion therapy are discussed herein with reference to the literature.

Effects of extended lymphadenectomy and postoperative chemotherapy on node-negative gastric cancer

AIM

To investigate the effects of extended lymphadenectomy and postoperative chemotherapy on gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

Clinical data of 311 node-negative gastric cancer patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy with more than 15 lymph nodes resected, from January 2002 to December 2006, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with pT4 stage or distant metastasis were excluded. We analyzed the relationship between the D2 lymphadenectomy and the 5-year survival rate among different subgroups stratified by clinical features, such as age, tumor size, tumor location and depth of invasion. At the same time, the relationship between postoperative chemotherapy and the 5-year survival rate among different subgroups were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate of the entire cohort was 63.7%. The 5-year survival rate was poor in those patients who were: (1) more than 65 years old; (2) with tumor size larger than 4 cm; (3) with tumor located in the upper portion of the stomach; and (4) with pT3 tumor. The survival rate was improved significantly by extended lymphadenectomy only in patients with pT3 tumor (P = 0.019), but not in other subgroups. Moreover, there was no significant difference in survival rate between patients with and without postoperative chemotherapy among all of the subgroups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For gastric cancer patients without lymph node metastasis, extended lymphadenectomy could improve the survival rate of those who have pT3-stage tumor. However, there was no evidence of a survival benefit from postoperative chemotherapy alone.

Survival and recurrence free benefits with different lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present meta-analysis was to estimate the magnitude of survival and recurrence free benefits from different lymphadenectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed for original studies published from their inception to 2012. Two reviewers independently assessed search results, methodological quality, and data extraction of included studies. Results regarding the overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) in the meta-analysis were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Twelve randomized control trials (RCTs) were eligible for final meta-analysis. There was not significant difference in OS between D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.77-1.10, P = 0.36), but subgroup analysis of patients without splenectomy and/or pancreatectomy has a trend for OS much more benefiting D2 compared to D1 patients. A significant RFS improvement was found in favor of D2 lymphadenectomy, sensitivity analysis also gives similar fixed effect estimates (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.81, P = 0.84). There were no significant differences in OS and RFS between D2 group and D3 group (1 trial).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis indicates that D2 lymphadenectomy with spleen and pancreas preservation offers the most survival benefit for patients with gastric cancer when done safety.

Lymph Node Ratio as a Predictor of Survival in Gastric Carcinoma

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), the number of metastatic lymph nodes is the main prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Lymph node ratio (LNR) has been proposed as a better predictor of survival. We included patients resected for gastric cancer in a referral center in Mexico City. Number of metastatic nodes was analyzed according to AJCC 2002 and 2010. We divided LNR into four stages. Survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and curves compared with the log-rank test. P < 0.05 was significant. Two hundred patients were included. Median number of retrieved and metastatic nodes were 18 and 2.5, respectively. Median survival was 44 months. AJCC 2010 was a better predictor of survival than the 2002 version ( P < 0.001). Median survival for LNR 0, 1, 2, and 3 was 117, 68, 44, and 14 months, respectively ( P < 0.001). In patients with less than 15 nodes removed, AJCC was not a predictor of survival ( P = 0.09) but LNR was ( P = 0.04). Nodal staging in AJCC 2010 is a better predictor of survival than the 2002 edition. LNR is useful in the group of patients with suboptimal node dissection.

Quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial factor for the (surgical) treatment of gastric cancer. The purpose of the current study was to define a minimum set of evidence-based quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and May 2011 was performed, using search terms on gastric cancer, treatment, and quality of care. Studies were selected based on predefined selection criteria. Potential quality of care indicators were assessed based on their level of evidence and were grouped into structure, process, and outcome indicators.

RESULTS

A total of 173 articles were included in the current study. For structural measures, evidence was found for the inverse relationship between hospital volume and postoperative mortality as well as overall survival. Regarding process measures, the most common indicators concerned surgical technique, perioperative care, and multimodality treatment. The only outcome indicator with supporting evidence was a microscopically radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although specific literature on quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer is limited, several quality of care indicators could be identified. These indicators can be used in clinical audits and other quality assurance programs.

Lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a critical review

Gastric cancer is one of the most common neoplasms and an important cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Efforts to reduce its high mortality rates are currently focused on multidisciplinary management. However, surgery remains a cornerstone in the management of patients with resectable disease. There is still some controversy as to the extent of lymph node dissection for potentially curable stomach cancer. Surgeons in eastern countries favor more extensive lymph node dissection, whereas those in the West favor less extensive dissection. Thus, extent of lymph node dissection remains one of the most hotly discussed aspects of gastric surgery, particularly because most stomach cancers are now often comprehensively treated by adding some perioperative chemotherapy or chemo-radiation. We provide a critical review of lymph nodes dissection for gastric cancer with a particular focus on its benefits in a multimodal approach.

Clinical trials in gastric cancer and the future

Following the first successful gastric resection for gastric cancer by Theodor Billroth in 1881 surgery has made tremendous progress leading to improved surgical mortality and morbidity. However, while treatment of early gastric cancer is frequently curative, 5-year survival rates for advanced gastric cancer remain dismal despite the application of perioperative multimodal treatment concepts. In this article we will outline key clinical trials that have lead to an improvement in treatment of gastric cancer patients with specific emphasis on the last 20 years. We will then outline recent concepts and key clinical trials that are currently being conducted in the field. Finally we will outline open questions that remain to be elucidated in the future.

Adjuvant chemotherapy: an option for Asian patients only?

Survival rates following curative resection for gastric cancer are higher in East Asia than in Europe and the US. The aggressive surgical approach adopted in East Asia may explain these observations. In Japan and Korea, gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (D2 gastrectomy) has been standard of care for many years, whereas gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy of the perigastric lymph nodes (D1 surgery) has been favored in Europe and the US until recently. D2 surgery is now recommended globally based on the 15-year findings from the large Dutch D1D2 study, which showed a reduction in cancer-related deaths with D2 versus D1 surgery. Improved outcomes are now being reported in the US and Europe as D2 surgery becomes more widely used. In addition to surgery, systemic therapy is also required to control recurrences, although the preferred regimen differs by region. Given that some of the studies on which these preferences are based predate the widespread acceptance of D2 surgery, the optimal regimen should be considered carefully. Recent studies from East Asia support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy should also be considered a valid approach in other regions now that the benefits of D2 surgery have been demonstrated unequivocally.

Lymph node dissection in curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgical resection with lymph node dissection is the only potentially curative therapy for gastric cancer. However, the appropriate extent of lymph node dissection accompanied by gastrectomy for cancer remains controversial. In East Asian countries, especially in Japan and Korea, D2 lymph node dissection has been regularly performed as a standard procedure. In Western countries, surgeons perform gastrectomy with D1 dissection only because D2 is associated with high mortality and morbidity compared to those associated with D1 alone but does not improve the 5-year survival rate. However, more recent studies have demonstrated that western surgeons can be trained to perform D2 lymphadenectomies on western patients with a lower morbidity and mortality. When extensive D2 lymph node dissection is preformed safely, there may be some benefit to D2 dissection even in western countries. In this paper, we present an update on the current literature regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer

Despite a decrease in incidence in recent decades, gastric cancer is still one of the most common causes of cancer death worldwide [1]. In areas without screening for gastric cancer, it is diagnosed late and has a high frequency of nodal involvement [1]. Even in early gastric cancer (EGC), the incidence of lymph node (LN) metastasis exceeds 10%; it was reported to be 14.1% overall and was 4.8 to 23.6% depending on cancer depth [2]. It is important to evaluate LN status preoperatively for proper treatment strategy; however, sufficient results are not being obtained using various modalities. Surgery is the only effective intervention for cure or long-term survival. It is possible to cure local disease without distant metastasis by gastrectomy and LN dissection. However, there is no survival benefit from surgery for systemic disease with distant metastasis such as para-aortic lymph node metastasis [3]. Therefore, whether the disease is local or systemic is an important prognostic indicator for gastric cancer, and the debate continues over the importance of extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. The concept of micro-metastasis has been described as a prognostic factor [4-9], and the biological mechanisms of LN metastasis are currently under study [10-12]. In this article, we review the status of LN metastasis including its molecular mechanisms and evaluate LN dissection for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Three-step method for lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery: a single institution experience of 120 patients

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer death. Complete resection is still the only treatment to offer a cure for patients with gastric cancer. Lymphadenectomy is the most important part of curative resection, but lymphadenectomy is also very difficult in gastric cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to report our 3-step method for lymphadenectomy and clarify its safety and value in gastric cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 120 consecutive patients underwent our 3-step method for lymphadenectomy at the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine between February 2006 and July 2007. The main surgical procedure was performed from right to left and from caudal to cranial. Clinical factors, surgical variables, postoperative morbidity, and hospital (30-day) mortality were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Total gastrectomy was performed in 41 patients; combined adjacent organ resection was performed in 9 patients. The mean operation time was 201.8 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 376.7 mL. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14.9 ± 4.3 days. A total of 3,569 lymph nodes (LNs) were removed and examined, and 2,879 were negative. More than 15 LNs were examined in all 120 patients. The median number of examined LNs was 29 (range 17 to 64; mean 29.7 ± SD 9.6) per patient, and the median number of positive LNs was 5 (range 0 to 37; mean 5.8 ± SD 7.1) per patient. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 10.8%, and the rate of hospital death was 0%. The median follow-up period for those patients was 34.3 months (range 10 to 53 months), and the overall 3-year survival rate was 40.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-step method for lymphadenectomy is easy to perform and is a safe and useful procedure for gastric cancer surgery.

Tumor site and perigastric nodal status are the most important predictors of para-aortic nodal involvement in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to identify pathological predictors of para-aortic nodal invasion in advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2007, 294 patients with advanced gastric cancer underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy + para-aortic nodal dissection in Siena and Verona, Italy.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (16%) patients had para-aortic node metastases. Of these, 91%, 88%, and 74%, respectively, also had metastases at stations No. 3, No. 1, and No. 7. Para-aortic node metastases were never observed when stations No. 1 and No. 3 were both negative. Patients were divided into three groups, according to the risk of para-aortic node invasion: (1) high-risk group (n = 24, 8.2%), presenting a 42% risk and comprising T3/T4 cancers with mixed/nonintestinal histology, arising from the upper third; (2) low-risk group (n = 138, 46.9%), presenting a 0-10% risk and including middle-lower third tumors-either T2 irrespective of histology, or T3/T4 with intestinal histology; (3) intermediate-risk group, comprising all other patients (n = 132, 44.9%). Their risk ranged between 16% and 30%, but increased up to 21-37.5% after excluding 33 patients with negative No. 1 and No. 3 stations.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of tumor site, histology, and T stage with perigastric nodal status allowed identification of patients at higher risk of para-aortic nodal invasion who could benefit from para-aortic nodal dissection.

High accuracy of multislices computed tomography (MSCT) for para-aortic lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: a prospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in the identification of para-aortic lymph node metastases from gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 92 consecutive patients with primary gastric cancer were prospectively submitted to preoperative MSCT staging according to a standard protocol in the period 2003-2010. All diagnostic procedures were performed by dedicated radiologists who were unaware of the final pathological nodal status. Subsequently all patients underwent potentially curative (R0) resection with extended lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic nodal dissection. Lymph node mapping in different stations and retrieval of single lymph nodes were performed by the surgeon on the fresh specimen and then submitted for pathological examination. Clinical, radiological, and pathological data were prospectively stored on database.

RESULTS

A median number of 47 (range: 18-114) total lymph nodes and 7 (range: 3-29) para-aortic lymph nodes were removed. In 13 of 92 included patients (14%), histological examination demonstrated para-aortic nodal metastases; MSCT was correctly positive in 11 of these cases (sensitivity: 85%). In 79 patients para-aortic nodes were not involved, and MSCT resulted correctly negative in 75 of these patients (specificity: 95%). Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were 73 and 97%, with a global accuracy of 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

MSCT performed according to a standard protocol by dedicated radiologists demonstrated high accuracy in preoperative identification of para-aortic nodal metastases from gastric cancer. These results may be useful in planning surgical approach or during clinical staging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

IL-6 serum levels predict postoperative morbidity in gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Despite progress in surgical techniques and perioperative care, gastrectomy remains a procedure of significant morbidity. Several scoring systems and clinical measures have been adopted to predict postoperative complications in gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high serum levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) in the early postoperative period may be a prognostic factor of postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

A group of 99 consecutive patients with resectable gastric cancer were enrolled. The mean age was 62.9 years and the male/female ratio was 72:27. Subtotal gastric resection was performed in 22 patients and total gastric resection in 77. The IL-6 serum level was measured on the 1st postoperative day (POD).

RESULTS

Complications were recorded in 28 patients (28.3%). The observed case-fatality rate was 3.03%. An IL-6 serum level of >288.7 pg/ml on the 1st POD in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models was an independent prognostic factor for overall complications and infective complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed an association between perioperative IL-6 serum levels and postoperative morbidity in gastric cancer patients. The IL-6 serum level on the 1st POD was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for both overall complications and infective complications.

The extent of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a critical appraisal

The extent of lymphadenectomy during therapeutic gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains a protracted and controversial issue. While traditionally extended lymphadenectomy is performed in Eastern Asia, limited lymphadenectomy is advocated by most western surgeons. Two large western randomized trials, meta-analyses and a recent systematic review were unable to demonstrate overall benefit from extended lymphadenectomy. In this review, the currently available data on this topic are critically evaluated, while ongoing studies and future perspective are discussed.

Lymph node dissection in the resection of gastric cancer: review of existing evidence

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgery is the only curative therapy for localized gastric cancer, but the extent of regional lymphadenectomy has been a matter of considerable debate. Extended resections that are regarded as standard procedures in some Asian countries, including Japan and Korea, have not been shown to be as effective in Western countries. The extent of lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer has been studied in many prospective randomized controlled trials. On the other hand, patients with early gastric cancer have an excellent survival rate (>90%) after radical surgery. Lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer is relatively infrequent. Therefore, it might be practical to perform less invasive surgery for early gastric cancer. In this review article, we examine the evidence for lymph node dissection as radical surgery in advanced gastric cancer and the possibility of limited resection for early gastric cancer.

Super-extended (D3) lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To analyze our experience with D3 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of advanced GC with specific reference to post-operative morbidity and mortality, incidence of para-aortic node (PAN) metastases, and long-term prognosis.

METHODS

Short- and long-term results of D3 lymphadenectomy were analyzed in 286 patients with advanced GC.

RESULTS

PAN metastases were demonstrated in 37 patients. PAN involvement was significantly higher in upper third tumours (29%) compared to middle and lower third (7%; P < 0.001). Eighty patients developed post-operative complications, being pulmonary disorders (6%), abdominal abscesses (4.5%) and pancreatic fistulas (3%) the most frequently observed. In-hospital mortality was 2%. Overall 5-year survival rate for R0 pT2-4 patients was 52%. When considering survival in relation to nodal involvement, both pN3 and non-regional lymph node metastases (M1a) patients showed a chance of long-term survival: 5-year survival was 31% for pN3 and 17% for M1a cases. Furthermore, the 5-year survival rate was remarkably high (about 60%) even in pN2 and pN3 subsets when no serosal invasion (pT2) was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

D3 lymphadenectomy could be further explored in specialized centers for curative surgery of advanced GC, especially for upper third tumours, providing that an acceptable morbidity and no increase in mortality can be offered.

The node ratio as prognostic factor after curative resection for gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

The depth of the tumor invasion and nodal involvement are the two main prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Staging systems differ among countries and new tools are needed to interpret and compare results and to reduce stage migration. The node ratio (NR) has been proposed as a new prognostic factor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 282 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer at Parma University Hospital between 2000 and 2007. TNM stage, NR, overall survival, survival according to nodal status, and survival according to the total number of nodes retrieved were calculated.

RESULTS

At univariate analysis, the TNM stage, number of metastatic nodes, NR, and depth of tumor invasion, but not the number of nodes retrieved, were significant prognosis factors. Patients with more than 15 nodes retrieved in the specimen survived significantly longer (p < 0.04). This was confirmed for all N or NR classes within N groups. There was a correlation between the number of nodes retrieved and N but not with the NR category. NR was an independent prognostic factor at Cox regression.

CONCLUSION

NR is a reliable and sensitive tool to differentiate patients with similar characteristics, probably more so than the TNM system. NR is not strictly related to the number of nodes retrieved and this may potentially decrease the stage migration phenomenon. More trials are needed to validate this factor.