Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions

Localization procedure for breast lesions at time of biopsy - Which patients would benefit?

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of non-palpable breast lesions is a multistep pathway that can involve imaging, tissue biopsy, clip placement, localization, and surgical resection. To minimize the procedural burden on patients, placement of localization seeds at time of initial biopsy has been considered. However, benefit to this patient population remains unclear. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the number of patients within our own institution that may benefit from upfront localization and characterize an appropriate target population.

METHODS

A single institution retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with assessment of all patients who underwent core needle biopsy (CNB) and/or breast cancer surgery at a regional high-volume breast centre between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Patients who underwent CNB with a subsequent radiological localization procedure and breast cancer surgeries that utilized localization were evaluated in order to model seed use.

RESULTS

In total, 314 CNB and 634 breast cancer surgeries were performed. Within the CNB cohort, 60 (19.1 ​%) required localization. Of the breast cancer surgeries performed, 420 (66.2 ​%) were breast-conserving surgery and 303 (47.8 ​%) required localization.

CONCLUSION

With some localization technologies, the localization procedure can be coupled with biopsy and eliminate the need for a clip as the length of implantation is unrestricted. That said, our institutional data suggests that only a small portion of patients undergoing breast biopsy would benefit from upfront localization and a minority of breast cancer surgeries require localization. Further characterization of this specific patient population is needed to streamline management pathways.

Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study

PURPOSE

To assess the reliability of excising residual breast cancer lesions after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) using a previously localized paramagnetic seed (Magseed®) and the subsequent use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) to evaluate response.

METHODS

Observational, prospective, multicenter study including adult women (> 18 years) with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing NAST between January 2022 and February 2023 with non-palpable tumor lesions at surgery. Radiologists marked tumors with Magseed® during biopsy before NAST, and surgeons excised tumors guided by the Sentimag® magnetometer. CESMs were performed before and after NAST to evaluate tumor response (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST]). We considered intraoperative, surgical, and CESM-related variables and histological response.

RESULTS

We analyzed 109 patients (median [IQR] age of 55.0 [46.0, 65.0] years). Magseed® was retrieved from breast tumors in all surgeries (100%; 95% CI 95.47-100.0%) with no displacement and was identified by radiology in 106 patients (97.24%), a median (IQR) of 176.5 (150.0, 216.3) days after marking. Most surgeries (94.49%) were conservative; they lasted a median (IQR) of 22.5 (14.75, 40.0) min (95% CI 23.59-30.11 min). Most dissected tumor margins (93.57%) were negative, and few patients (5.51%) needed reintervention. Magseed® was identified using CESM in all patients (100%); RECIST responses correlated with histopathological evaluations of dissected tumors using the Miller-Payne response grade (p < 0.0001) and residual lesion diameter (p < 0.0001). Also 69 patients (63.3%) answered a patient's satisfaction survey and 98.8% of them felt very satisfied with the entire procedure.

CONCLUSION

Long-term marking of breast cancer lesions with Magseed® is a reliable and feasible method in patients undergoing NAST and may be used with subsequent CESM.

Assessing the Efficacy of Radioactive Iodine Seed Localisation in Targeted Axillary Dissection for Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), employing marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB) alongside sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), is increasingly recognised for its efficacy in reducing false negative rates (FNRs) in node-positive early breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). One such method, 125I radioactive seed localisation (RSL), involves implanting a seed into a biopsy-proven lymph node either pre- or post-NST. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed to assess the performance of RSL in TAD among node-positive patients undergoing NST. Six studies, encompassing 574 TAD procedures, met the inclusion criteria. Results showed a 100% successful deployment rate, with a 97.6% successful localisation rate and a 99.8% retrieval rate. Additionally, there was a 60.0% concordance rate between SLNB and MLNB. The FNR of SLNB alone was significantly higher than it was for MLNB (18.8% versus 5.3%, respectively; p = 0.001). Pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in 44% of cases (248/564). On average, the interval from 125I seed deployment to surgery was 75.8 days (range: 0-272). These findings underscore the efficacy of RSL in TAD for node-positive patients undergoing NST, enabling precise axillary pCR identification and facilitating the safe omission of axillary lymph node dissection.

Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag localisation of non-palpable breast lesions a single centre experience

AIM

The purpose of this study is to report the surgical experience and outcomes with pre-operative localisation of non-palpable breast lesions using the RFID tag system.

METHODS

The cohort for this prospective study included patients over the age of 18 with biopsy proven, non-palpable indeterminate lesions, DCIS or breast cancer requiring pre-operative localisation before surgical excision between September 2020 and July 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 312 RFID tags were placed in 299 consecutive patients. Indications for localisation included non-palpable invasive cancer in 255 (85.3%) patients, in situ disease in 38 (12.7%) and indeterminate lesions requiring surgical excision in 6 (2.0%). Both in situ and invasive lesions had a median size of 13 mm (range 4-100 mm) on pre-operative imaging. The RFID tags were in situ for a median time of 21 days before surgery (range 0-233 days). Of the 213 tags, 292 (93.6%) were introduced using ultrasound (USS) guidance and stereotactically in 20 (6.4%). In 3 (1.0%) cases the RFID tag was either not satisfactorily deployed at the intended target or retrieved intra-operatively. Following discussion of post-operative histology by the multi-disciplinary team, further surgery for close or involved margins was for 26 (8.7%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The Hologic RFID tag system can be used for accurate pre-operative localisation of non-palpable masses as well as diffuse abnormalities such as mammographic distortions and calcifications. It has advantages of flexibility for scheduling image-guided insertion independently of scheduled operating lists and can be placed to localise lesions prior to initiating neoadjuvant systemic treatment.

Preoperative localization of breast lesions: Comparing digital breast tomosynthesis-guided radioactive seed localization versus standard 2D stereotactic radioactive seed localization

PURPOSE

To compare single seed digital breast tomosynthesis-guided radioseed localization (DBT-L) to standard 2D stereotactic-guided radioseed localization (SGL) of the breast.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a large tertiary cancer center's database yielded 68 women who underwent preoperative DBT-L from March 2019-December 2019 and a matched cohort of 65 women who underwent SGL during the same period. The electronic medical record and radiology were reviewed for patient characteristics including breast density, exam technique, pre- and post-operative pathology, exam duration, and radiation dose to the patient. To compare margin outcomes between the groups, the chi-square test of independence was used; to compare continuous outcomes such as exam duration and total dose, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used.

RESULTS

DBT-L and SGL localization targets included biopsy marker (62/68, 91% vs 55/65, 85%), distortion (4/68, 6% vs 2/65, <3%), focal asymmetry (1/68 and 1/65, < 2% for both), calcifications (1/68, <2% vs 4/65, 6%), and anatomic landmarks (0% vs 3/65, 5%). 72% and 71% of localizations were performed for malignant pathology in the DBT-L and SGL groups, respectively. The median duration of DBT-L was 8.3 min vs 10.3 min for SGL, representing statistically significant time savings (p = 0.003). The median total organ dose of DBT-L was 8.6 mGy vs 10.4 mGy for SGL, representing statistically significant dose savings (p = 0.018). The incidence of positive margins at surgery was not statistically different between the groups (p = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

DBT-L demonstrates both time and dose savings for the patient compared to SGL without compromising surgical outcome.

Iodine-125 seed versus hook-wire guided breast conserving surgery: do post operative complication rates differ?

BACKGROUND

Radio-guided occult lesion localisation using iodine 125 seeds (ROLLIS) is used to localize impalpable breast cancers for breast conserving surgery (BCS). Previous studies have suggested improved efficiency and patient outcomes with ROLLIS compared with hook-wire localisation (HWL). The aim of this report is to compare the post-operative complication rates and safety profiles of ROLLIS versus hook-wire guided surgery.

METHODS

Between September 2013 and March 2018, 690 women with non-palpable breast cancer eligible for breast-conserving surgery were randomly assigned to either pre-operative localisation with 125 I seed or hook-wire as part of the ROLLIS clinical trial. Medical record review of 170 women (30% of the total participants) from three tertiary hospitals in Western Australia was performed. Post-operative complications were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) grade I to V.

RESULTS

Total of 170 surgeries were performed: 82 by ROLLIS and 88 by hook-wire. The overall complication rate in the ROLLIS group was 19.5%, with 15.9% being grade II and 3.66% grade III. In the HWL group, the complication rate was 22.7% with 20.5% being grade II and 2.27% grade III. There was no statistically significant difference in complication grades between the 2 groups. No grade IV or grade V complications were reported. Complications observed included drainable seroma, drainable haematoma and surgical site infection.

CONCLUSION

ROLLIS is a safe method of localisation for surgical resection with similar complication rates as hookwires. We encourage its use as an alternative localisation technique as it has demonstrable superiority and efficacy.

Transitioning From the Traditional Wire Localization to the Wireless Technology for Surgical Guidance at Lumpectomies: Part A. Radioseed Localization

Iodine-125 (I-125) labelled radioactive seeds were the first published wireless pre-operative image-guided breast localization technique. Radioseeds offer benefit to radiologists as a relatively intuitive procedure with precise mammographic or sonographic-guided localization and improved patient experience. Localization and surgical dates can be uncoupled, which facilitates efficient scheduling for radiologists and surgeons. Surgeons can better tailor their surgery with intra-operative localization using a special probe to detect the emitted gamma energy. Due to radioactivity, implementation of a radioseed program requires compliance with the National Regulatory Commission and therefore multidisciplinary involvement. Seeds have a high placement success rate, and comparable surgical success and re-excision rate to wires.

Comparison of Wire-Guided Lumpectomy (WGL) Versus Hematoma-Directed Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy (HDUGL) in Management of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in Achieving a Negative Resection Margin: a Randomized Trial with Superiority Hypothesis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis

The advances in imaging techniques and growing awareness have increased the detection of nonpalpable breast lesions, which may be neoplastic or high-risk lesions. The standard technique of localizing these nonpalpable breast lesions is wire-guided biopsy/lumpectomy. However, wire-guided excision is fraught with the complications of migration, transection, patient discomfort, pneumothorax, vasovagal episodes, and injury to the radiologist, surgeon, and pathologist. We embarked upon a randomized controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness and patient-reported outcome (PRO) with hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided lumpectomy (HDUGL) versus conventional wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL) for nonpalpable breast lesions. This study was a parallel design, randomized controlled trial with a superiority hypothesis. Twenty-five patients could be randomized to wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL) group (n = 13) and hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided lumpectomy (HDUGL) group (n = 12). Post-excision specimen sonography and mammography for assessing adequacy of margin were done. A margin shave was performed in cases of close or suspicious margin on ultrasonography or mammogram. Both the groups were comparable in age, tumor size, histological subtypes, and location of lesions. The median resection volume in two groups was 34.5 (26.5) ml for HDUGL vs. 41 (15) ml for WGL. Intraoperative cavity shave was required only in the WGL group (n = 3.23%) and margin positivity was also more in the WGL group (n = 2,15.38%) as compared to the HDUGL group (n = 1,8.33%) but neither differences in cavity shave nor positive margins leading to re-operations were statistically significant. The difference in cost of surgery in two groups (INR 4680 ± 560.00 for HDUGL and INR 7486 ± 616.41 for WGL) was statistically significant (P = 0.00). Resultantly, HDUGL was more cost-effective (INR 5105.45) than WGL (INR 8847.09). Patients in the HDUGL group were more satisfied according to the Likert scale of 5 but this difference in two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). The hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided lumpectomy (HDUGL) is better than wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL) for nonpalpable breast lesions in terms of cost-effectiveness. Trial details: CTRI No. CTRI/2019/05/019347. Registered on 24/05/2019, Registered prospectively.

Radioactive Seed Localization for Conservative Surgery of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Recommendations for Technology Implantation Program

BACKGROUND

The radioactive seed localization (RSL) is used in impalpable breast cancer conservative surgery to assist the surgeon in accurately locating and excising the lesion site. This study aims to present recommendations about the RSL program implementation in health institutions that perform breast cancer conservative surgery with intraoperative localization.

METHODS

An extensive literature review was performed. It comprehends: the committee responsible for implementation of the program actions; description of the necessary multidisciplinary team; the radiological safety committee role; the facility licensing; professionals training; material and instrumentation associated with the technique; and seed tracking system.

RESULTS

13 topics are presented. The Program Implementation Committee must be formed by leaders from each department. The committee assumes responsibility for evaluating the necessary processes and presenting the schedule for program implementation. Since the procedure is classified as a nuclear medicine procedure it requires licensing. The Professional Team Formation, Education, and Training is a priority and simulation exercises are necessary. The Materials and Instrumentation Associated with the Technique must be well-know by the team and they should practice using radiation detectors. The seed must be always tracked, from moment they are received to discard. An Inventory for Tracking Seeds is provided. The Radiological Safety Aspects such as the ALARA principle are presented. A full description for the Radiological Procedure for Placing the seeds, the surgical removal and the Specimen Handling in Pathology focusing on how to locate the seed and retrieve them. After removed, the seeds can be placed in storage to wait for full radioactive decay or be returned to the manufacturer.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure has the advantage to increase to 2 months the time between insertion of the seed and the surgical removal. Regular multidisciplinary team meetings during program development are important to create a realistic timeline, having briefing meetings after the first 1-5 RSL cases and having annual or biannual follow-up meetings to discuss any issues or incidents. Abstract Graphic ImageCreated by Macrovector, obtained in Freepik at https://br.freepik.com/fotos-vetores-gratis/oncologia.This graphical abstract shows everything that is necessary to implement the RSL technique and are discussed in this paper.

HIGHLIGHTS

This study present recommendations for RSL program implementation in hospitalsWas performed by an extensive descriptive and qualitative literature reviewTopics 1: Implementation Committee, Professional Team Training, InstrumentationTopics 2: Radiological Safety, Patient Consent, Radiological ProcessTopics 3: Surgical Procedure, Pathology, Seeds Disposal Completion.

ROLLIS roll‐out: Pitfalls, errors, lessons learned and recommendations from Australian and New Zealand experience during the randomised controlled trial, implementing a novel localisation method for impalpable malignant breast lesions, radio‐guided occult lesion localisation with iodine‐125 ( 125 I) seed ( ROLLIS )

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer surgery aims to excise lesions with clear margins and provide optimal cosmesis with a low re-excision rates. These aims are aided by accurate lesion localisation and a surgical choice of incision site with minimal removal of healthy tissue. Problems associated with hookwires have led to adoption of non-wire methods including radioguided occult lesion localisation using iodine-125 (ROLLIS). This paper outlines the problems encountered and lessons learnt during the largest RCT involving 659 participants, conducted at eight sites (seven Australian, one New Zealand centres) between September 2013 and April 2018.* METHODS: Data, along with substantive comments, regarding each ROLLIS procedure, documenting each step from the seed insertion, ease of operative retrieval, to return of the seed to medical physics, from a shared on-line secure database and a separate site email survey, were synthesised and categorised.

RESULTS

The Australian and New Zealand ROLLIS RCT experience highlights several important issues. Lessons learned were related to licencing the seed and tracking protocols. A Designated Team Lead, who is a good communicator, ensuring the Tracking Protocols were accurately followed and updated, subspecialty leads and a Co-ordinator, responsible for training, logbook maintenance and seed ordering, enhanced the success and acceptance of the programme. Addressing radiation issues, fears, education of staff and seed loss was imperative.

CONCLUSION

The Australian and New Zealand ROLLIS RCT experience highlights the need for adherence to local licencing laws and protocols, appointing a dedicated ROLLIS Designated Team Lead with good communication and a ROLLIS Co-ordinator. These facilitate the adoption of a successful ROLLIS programme.

Combined LOCalizer™ and Intraoperative Ultrasound Localization: First Experience in Localization of Non-palpable Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Wire-guided localization is the gold-standard for the detection of non-palpable breast lesions, although with acknowledged limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined use of LOCalizerr™ (Hologic, Santa Carla, CA, USA), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for localization and surgery of non-palpable breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with non-palpable breast lesions underwent localization procedure with LOCalizer™ and IOUS. After the placement of the marker, eight measures were made to guide the excision. LOCalizerr™ Pencil and IOUS were performed to obtain the distance between the dissection plane and the margins of lesions.

RESULTS

The procedure was feasible in the five enrolled patients and associated with clear oncological margins in all cases. Moreover, a high satisfaction according to Likert scale for surgeons, radiologists and patients, performing limited and tailored resections, was reported.

CONCLUSION

Combining LOCalizerr™ and IOUS is an effective method for locating non-palpable breast cancer, guarantying excellent oncological and cosmetic results.

Therapeutic applications of radioactive sources: from image-guided brachytherapy to radio-guided surgical resection

It is well known nowadays that radioactivity can destroy the living cells it interacts with. It is therefore unsurprising that radioactive sources, such as iodine-125, were historically developed for treatment purposes within radiation oncology with the goal of damaging malignant cells. However, since then, new techniques have been invented that make creative use of the same radioactivity properties of these sources for medical applications. Here, we review two distinct kinds of therapeutic uses of radioactive sources with applications to prostate, cervical, and breast cancer: brachytherapy and radioactive seed localization. In brachytherapy (BT), the radioactive sources are used for internal radiation treatment. Current approaches make use of real-time image guidance, for instance by means of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, computed tomography, and sometimes positron emission tomography, depending on clinical availability and cancer type. Such image-guided BT for prostate and cervical cancer presents a promising alternative and/or addition to external beam radiation treatments or surgical resections. Radioactive sources can also be used for radio-guided tumor localization during surgery, for which the example of iodine-125 seed use in breast cancer is given. Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is increasingly popular as an alternative tumor localization technique during breast cancer surgery. Advantages of applying RSL include added flexibility in the clinical scheduling logistics, an increase in tumor localization accuracy, and higher patient satisfaction; safety measures do however have to be employed. We exemplify the implementation of RSL in a clinic through experiences at the Netherlands Cancer Institute.

Image-Guided Localization Techniques for Surgical Excision of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: An Overview of Current Literature and Our Experience with Preoperative Skin Tattoo

Breast conserving surgery has become the standard of care and is more commonly performed than mastectomy for early stage breast cancer, with recent studies showing equivalent survival and lower morbidity. Accurate preoperative lesion localization is mandatory to obtain adequate oncological and cosmetic results. Image guidance assures the precision requested for this purpose. This review provides a summary of all techniques currently available, ranging from the classic wire positioning to the newer magnetic seed localization. We describe the procedures and equipment necessary for each method, outlining the advantages and disadvantages, with a focus on the cost-effective preoperative skin tattoo technique performed at our centre. Breast surgeons and radiologists have to consider ongoing technological developments in order to assess the best localization method for each individual patient and clinical setting.

Radioactive iodine-125 seed localization as an aid in reoperative neck surgery

BACKGROUND

Scarring and disrupted tissue planes add to already-complex neck anatomy and make localization of nonpalpable pathology difficult in cervical endocrine reoperations. We describe the use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization (RSL) in 6 patients with metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and 2 with recurrent hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS

Eight patients had 2-D ultrasound-guided RSL of the target lesion, 0-3 days preoperatively. Intraoperative gamma probe (Neoprobe) was used to plan incision placement and localize the implanted seed. Recorded operative variables included: number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS) and RSL and operative complications.

RESULTS

All patients had successful resection of the targeted area and removal of the radioactive seed. There was no seed migration. Two complications occurred in the thyroid group.

CONCLUSION

Radioactive iodine 125 seeds facilitate successful localization of endocrine pathology during reoperative cervical procedures.

Adequacy of invasive and in situ breast carcinoma margins in radioactive seed and wire-guided localization lumpectomies

Image-guided preoperative localizations help surgeons to completely resect nonpalpable breast cancers. The objective of this study is to compare the adequacy of specimen margins for both invasive breast cancer (IBC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after radioactive seed localization (RSL) vs wire-guided localization (WGL). We retrospectively reviewed 600 cases at a single Canadian academic center from January 2014 to September 2017, comparing surgical margins, re-excisions and reoperations, localization accuracy and major complications (migration, accidental deployment, vasovagal reaction), as well as operative duration between RSL and WGL cases. IBC margins were positive in 7% of RSL and 6% of WGL cases (P = .57). Tumor size (P = .039) and association with DCIS (P = .036) predicted positive margins in invasive carcinoma. DCIS margins were positive in 6% and 8%, and close (≤2 mm) in 37% and 36% of cases (P = .45) for RSL and RSL cases respectively. The presence of extensive intraductal component predicted positive DCIS margins (P < .0001). There was no significant difference between intraoperative re-excisions (P = .54), localization accuracy (P = .34), and operation duration (P = .81). Reoperation for lumpectomies and mastectomies was marginally higher for WGL than RSL (P = .049). There were 11 (4%) WGL and no RSL complications (P = .03). Overall, positive margins for IBC, close or positive margins for DCIS, intraoperative re-excision, localization accuracy, and operation duration were similar between RSL and WGL. The reoperation rate was higher in WGL than RSL, which may reflect practice changes over time. RSL was safer than WGL with lower complication rates.

Hospital System Adoption of Magnetic Seeds for Wireless Breast and Lymph Node Localization

BACKGROUND

As an alternative to traditional wire localization, an inducible magnetic seed system can be used to identify and remove nonpalpable breast lesions and axillary lymph nodes intraoperatively. We report the largest single-institution experience of magnetic seed placement for operative localization to date, including feasibility and short-term outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent placement of a magnetic seed in the breast or lymph node were identified from July 2017 to March 2019. Imaging findings, core needle biopsy, surgical pathology results, and type of surgery were collected. Outcomes included procedural complications, magnetic seed and biopsy clip retrieval rates, and need for additional surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 842 magnetic seeds were placed by nine radiologists in 673 patients and retrieved by six surgeons at six operative locations. The majority of breast lesions were malignant (395/659, 59.9%); 136 seeds were placed for lymph node localization. The overall magnetic seed retrieval rate was 98.6%, whereas the biopsy clip retrieval rate was 90.9%. Only six patients (0.7%) experienced a complication from magnetic seed placement. Reexcision was performed in 15.2% of patients with breast cancer; 9.6% of benign/high risk lesions were upgraded to malignancy at surgical excision.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnetic seed technique is safe, effective, and accurate for localization of breast lesions and lymph nodes, and importantly uncouples surgery from the localization procedure. The high magnetic seed retrieval rate and low reexcision rate may reflect the accuracy of magnetic marker placement as a "second chance" localization procedure, especially in cases with biopsy clip migration.

Reflector Localization of Breast Lesions and Parameters Associated with Positive Surgical Margins in Women Undergoing Breast Conservation Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our experience with reflector localization of breast lesions and parameters influencing surgical margins in patients with a malignant diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective institution review board-approved review of our institutional database was performed for breast lesions preoperatively localized from September 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017. Wire localizations were excluded. From electronic medical records and imaging, the following data was recorded: breast density, lesion type and size, reflector placement modality and number placed, reflector distance from lesion and skin, excision of lesion and reflector, tissue volume, margin status, and final pathology. Statistical analysis was performed with a Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney test, and logistic regression. P < 0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

A total of 111 reflectors were deployed in the breasts of 103 women with 109 breast lesions. Ninety (81.1%) reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance and 21 (18.9%) under US. The lesions consisted of 68 (62.4%) masses, 17 (15.6%) calcifications, 2 (1.8%) architectural distortions, and 22 (20.2%) biopsy markers. Fourteen (21.2%) of 66 cases with a preoperative malignant diagnosis had a positive surgical margin. Final pathology, including 6 lesions upgraded to malignancy on excision, demonstrated 72 (66.0%) malignant, 22 (20.2%) high-risk, and 15 (13.8%) benign lesions. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant parameters (lesion type or size, placement modality, reflector distance to skin or lesion, specimen radiography or pathology) were associated with a positive surgical margin.

CONCLUSION

Reflector localization is an alternative to wire localization of breast lesions. There were no lesion-specific or technical parameters affecting positive surgical margins.

Intraoperative Pathologic Margin Analysis and Re-Excision to Minimize Reoperation for Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery

BACKGROUND

Reoperation rates following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) range from 10 to 40%, with marked surgeon and institutional variation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with intraoperative margin re-excision, evaluate for any differences in local recurrence based on margin re-excision and determine reoperation rates with use of intraoperative margin analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed consecutive patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer who underwent BCS at our institution between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2016. Routine intraoperative frozen section margin analysis was performed and positive or close margins were re-excised intraoperatively. Univariate analysis was used to compare margin status and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to analyze factors associated with re-excision.

RESULTS

We identified 3201 patients who underwent BCS-688 for DCIS and 2513 for invasive carcinoma. Overall, 1513 (60.2%) patients with invasive cancer and 434 (63.1%) patients with DCIS had close or positive margins that underwent intraoperative re-excision. Margin re-excision was associated with larger tumor size in both groups. The permanent pathology positive margin rate among all patients was 1.2%, and the 30-day reoperation rate for positive margins was 1.1%. Five-year local recurrence rates were 0.6% and 1.2% for patients with DCIS and invasive cancer, respectively. There was no difference in recurrence between patients with and without intraoperative margin re-excision (p = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Both DCIS and invasive carcinoma had similar rates of intraoperative margin re-excision. Although intraoperative margin re-excision was common, the reoperation rate was extremely low and there was no difference in recurrence between those with or without intraoperative re-excision.

Radioactive Seed Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in an Academic Comprehensive Cancer Program Community Hospital Setting

Wire localized excision (WLE) has been a long-standing method for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Disadvantages of this method include difficulty locating the wire tip in relation to borders of the lesion, imprecise placement of the wire, and the need to place the wire shortly before scheduled surgery. These shortcomings may lead to a high positive margin rate requiring re-excision to obtain clear margins for breast cancer. Radioactive seed localized excision (RSLE) of nonpalpable breast lesions has been advocated as a safe and effective alternative to WLE. The primary endpoints of the study were to compare re-excision rates between WLE and RSLE of nonpalpable breast lesions and to determine if there were any differences in volume of tissue removed. One hundred three patients were included in a retrospective review of localized breast excisions done by a single surgeon. Forty-four patients underwent WLE between April 2007 and February 2009. Fifty-nine patients underwent RSLE between September 2009 and January 2012. Margins were considered to be clear if at least 1 mm of normal tissue was obtained from the circumferential periphery of the lesion in question. RSLE resulted in a re-excision rate of 17 versus 55 per cent re-excision rate for wire localization ( P < 0.001). Excision volume was greater for patients having wire localization ( P = 0.074). RSLE is an effective technique for excision of non-palpable breast lesions in the community setting. This technique allows for accurate localization and appears to allow for smaller volume of tissue to be excised.

Early budget impact analysis on magnetic seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION

Current localization techniques used in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable tumors show several disadvantages. Magnetic Seed Localization (MSL) is an innovative localization technique aiming to overcome these disadvantages. This study evaluated the expected budget impact of adopting MSL compared to standard of care.

METHODS

Standard of care with Wire-Guided Localization (WGL) and Radioactive Seed Localization (RSL) use was compared with a future situation gradually adopting MSL next to RSL or WGL from a Dutch national perspective over 5 years (2017-2022). The intervention costs for WGL, RSL and MSL and the implementation costs for RSL and MSL were evaluated using activity-based costing in eight Dutch hospitals. Based on available list prices the price of the magnetic seed was ranged €100-€500.

RESULTS

The intervention costs for WGL, RSL and MSL were respectively: €2,617, €2,834 and €2,662 per patient and implementation costs were €2,974 and €26,826 for MSL and RSL respectively. For standard of care the budget impact increased from €14.7m to €16.9m. Inclusion of MSL with a seed price of €100 showed a budget impact of €16.7m. Above a price of €178 the budget impact increased for adoption of MSL, rising to €17.6m when priced at €500.

CONCLUSION

MSL could be a cost-efficient localization technique in resecting non-palpable tumors in the Netherlands. The online calculation model can inform adoption decisions internationally. When determining retail price of the magnetic seed, cost-effectiveness should be considered.

125I radioactive seed localization (RSL) in surgery of cervical metastasis of thyroid cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work is the evaluation of usefulness of radioactive seed localization (RSL) for the detection of cervical recurrence of thyroid cancer in order to improve the surgical outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Ten patients with thyroid cancer and lymph node involvement (4 naive and 6 with cervical recurrence) evidenced by ultrasound, cytology/Tg-FNAB (reoperated group) were selected for this procedure. A ¹²⁵I seed was placed in the metastatic lesion using a needle guided by ultrasound. During surgery, a handheld gamma probe/portable gammacamera were used for lesion localization and excision. After removing the target tissue, it was verified that the seed was included in the excised tissue. Surgical intervention duration, lesion location, seed activity, thyroglobulin level, effective radiation dose, complications and the degree of surgical resection were analyzed.

RESULTS

All the marked nodes were positive in histology. The mean duration of the ultrasound procedure was 11.4±3.4minutes. Seed was kept inside the patient, in average, during 4days (1-7) and the average surgical time was 44.7±29.1minutes. We found 21 metastatic specimens with an average diameter 13.9±6.3mm. The mean activity of the implanted seed was 71.27±21.6MBq (42.8-105) In the reoperated group, thyroglobulin level was 2.08±1.56ng/dl and decreased after surgery to 0.13±0.12ng/dl, P<.01. Only one case of transient hypoparathyroidism was found in the total group.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of RSL in our unit has shown benefits for the patient and medical team, being a safe and effective procedure that also improves surgical programming.

Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance With an Ultrasound-Visible Clip: A Practical and Cost-effective Option for Breast Cancer Localization

OBJECTIVES

In partial mastectomy (PM) or lumpectomy, ultrasound (US) localization avoids discomfort and additional procedures associated with wire localization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between ultrasound-visible clip (UVC) use at the time of biopsy and US use during resection, hypothesizing that UVCs facilitate US localization and reduce costs compared with traditional radiopaque clips or no clip placement.

METHODS

The study population consisted of adult female patients with breast cancer undergoing PM or lumpectomy at our institution between 2014 and 2016. The core biopsy clip type and localization method during PM were characterized as wire localization versus US localization, and associations were estimated with multivariable regression models. For the cost evaluation, breast biopsy data were obtained from the Department of Radiology.

RESULTS

Among 674 patients, 490 had data on localization and the clip type. Ultrasound-visible clip placement at biopsy increased US use during resection by 13% (95% confidence interval, 6%-21%). There was no difference in the total specimen weight with US versus wire localization. The cost savings for using UVCs for the 2209 patients who underwent breast biopsy from 2014 to 2016 was $36,000.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that US localization for PM is feasible at a single institution and cost-effective when facilitated by UVCs. Placement of a UVC at the time of biopsy is recommended, as it is cost-effective and avoids the discomfort and inconvenience of wire localization.

Preoperative Localization of Breast MRI Lesions: MRI-guided Marker Placement With Radioactive Seed Localization as an Alternative to MRI-guided Wire Localization

Objective

Preoperative MRI-guided wire localization (MWL) presents challenges to both the physician and patient. In this study, we examined the efficiency and outcome of MRI-guided marker placement followed by mammographic-guided radioactive seed localization (MMP/RSL) as an alternative localization method. The primary outcome parameter was pathology upon excision. The secondary outcome parameters were total procedure time and clinical indication for localization.

Methods

A retrospective review of a large tertiary cancer center's breast imaging database was performed. Records of 21 patients with MMP/RSL (24 markers) from August 2013 to January 2019 were compared with 34 patients receiving MWL (48 wires) from January 2016 to January 2019. Multiple factors, including age, prelocalization pathology, postsurgical pathology, concordance, re-excision rates, and total procedure time required for each technique, were compared. Univariate and descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

Results

Mean patient age in years (MMP/RSL = 54.1 ± 13.1, MWL = 55.1 ± 10.8, P = 0.389), time in MR scanner in minutes (MMP/RSL = 31.7 ± 12.0, MWL = 35.8 ± 13.1, P = 0.678), and postsurgical pathology malignancy rates (MMP/RSL = 71.4%, MWL = 65.7%, P = 0.7715) were similar without statistically significant differences. As expected, the mean total procedure time was slightly longer without a statistically significant difference (47.3 ± 19.8 min versus 35.8 ± 13.1 min, P = 0.922) for the MMP/RSL group. All patients in both groups underwent successful localization with 100% radiologic-pathology concordance. Re-excision rates were lower for the MMP/RSL group (9.5%) versus the MWL group (16.7%); however, they were not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.7104).

Conclusion

MMP/RSL is a feasible alternative to MWL and may alleviate many challenges presented by MWL. Further studies are needed.

Use of Reduced Activity Seeds in Breast Radioactive Seed Localization

Radioactive seed localization procedures, using I seeds of typical activity 3.7 MBq and higher, are performed to localize nonpalpable lesions in the breast for surgical excision and pathology analysis. This study evaluated the use and dosimetry of I seeds of activity <3.7 MBq in radioactive seed localization procedures through retrospective health record review, Monte Carlo simulation, and experimental detection. An average seed strength at the time of specimen excision of 2.48 ± 0.629 MBq was used in 295 radioactive seed localization procedures at Gundersen Health System in La Crosse, Wisconsin, US. The average explanted seed activity served as a basis for Monte Carlo simulation of an I IsoAid Advantage seed embedded in soft tissue, which scored the dose deposited to soft tissue. Tabulated values of the dose to postsurgical residual tissue as a function of explanted tumor radius were shown and compared with previously published results. Use of seeds of activity from 1.44 to 3.7 MBq at the time of excision did not adversely affect seed detection and excision. The absorbed dose to residual tissue calculated using Monte Carlo was an average of 1.4 times larger than previously published results when scaled to identical seed strengths. This study demonstrates that seeds of activity <3.7 MBq can be used for radioactive seed localization procedures with no loss in efficacy and a benefit of reduced radiation dose to patients. This is important because the estimated radiation dose to residual tissue is approximately 1.4 times higher than previously indicated.

Novel Uses of Radioactive Seeds in Surgical Oncology: A Case Series

The localization of nonpalpable axillary metastatic lymph nodes has been achieved using several techniques in the past. Amongst these techniques, the use of radioactive iodine seeds is increasingly spread, and was initially reserved to breast-conserving surgery. Many studies have assessed the use of radioactive seed localization for the surgical management of breast cancer patients diagnosed with lymph node metastases. However, few articles have reported their utilization in other cancer subtypes and in complex clinical situations. This case series describes the innovative use of radioactive seeds in the axilla in five patients, including one case of squamous cell carcinoma skin cancer, one case of malignant melanoma, and three cases of invasive breast cancer.

Rapid Implementation of Intraoperative Ultrasonography to Reduce Wire Localization in The Permanente Medical Group

CONTEXT

Preoperative wire localization (WL), the most common localization technique for nonpalpable breast lesions, has drawbacks including scheduling constraints, cost, and patient discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

To reduce WL use in our health care system, we investigated using hydrogel clips to facilitate intraoperative ultrasonography-guided lumpectomies.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of patients with nonpalpable, ultrasound-visible breast lesions who underwent lumpectomy by 7 surgeons at 4 pilot sites in Kaiser Permanente Northern California between January 2015 and October 2015. Hydrogel clips, used for several years before the study period, were placed routinely during core-needle biopsy in all patients with nonpalpable, ultrasound-visible breast lesions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Localization method, lesion size, margin positivity, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three patients underwent hydrogel clip placement and lumpectomy by pilot-site surgeons. Localization consisted of intraoperative ultrasonography alone, preoperative skin marking, or WL. Of the 143 patients, 71.3% did not need WL (60.8% ultrasonography alone and 10.5% skin marking). The non-WL and WL groups had similarly sized lesions, and the positive margin rate was 7.2% overall, with no significant difference between the non-WL and WL groups (5.9% vs 11.5%, p = 0.33). Of the 12 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 8 (67%) did not require WL.

CONCLUSION

A multifacility protocol using intraoperative ultrasonography to visualize hydrogel clips was implemented, which decreased WL procedures and produced no significant difference in margin positivity between the WL and non-WL groups. This technique can be a cost-effective alternative to WL in patients who are candidates for hydrogel clip placement.

Surgical clips vs. iodine-125 (125I) seeds for marking the location of nonpalpable malignant breast lesions: preliminary results

OBJECTIVES

To assess the usefulness of iodine-125 (125I) seeds as an alternative to surgical clips for marking the location of nonpalpable malignant breast lesions for surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included patients with histologically confirmed nonpalpable malignant lesions treated by surgery in 2015 or 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to presurgical marking with metallic clips (Group A) or with 125I seeds (Group B). In both groups, marking was guided by ultrasound and/or mammography depending on the radiologic characteristics of the lesion. During surgery, a gamma probe was used and afterward the presence of seeds in the surgical specimen was checked radiologically. In the histological analysis, the absence of tumor in the stain was considered free margins. We analyzed the following variables: age, lesion characteristics (laterality, mean size on MRI and in the surgical specimen, radiological type), and presence/absence of free margins.

RESULTS

In Group A (n=53), the most common histologic subtypes were infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC, 84.9%) and luminal A (LA, 49.1%); the mean size of the lesions was 1.8cm. In Group B (n=45), the most common histologic subtypes were IDC (82.2%) and LA (46.5%); the mean size of the lesions was 1.5cm. In Group A, 13.2% had involved margins and 13.2% underwent a second surgical intervention. In Group, B 11.4% had involved margins and 7.5% underwent a second surgical intervention. The differences between groups were not significant (p=0.7 for involved margins and p=0.5 for reintervention). The volume of the surgical specimens was significantly lower in Group B than in Group A (128.68cm3 vs. 189.37cm3; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using 125I seeds was feasible and enabled significantly smaller surgical specimens than using metallic clips.

Comparison of Radioactive Seed Localized Excision and Wire Localized Excision of Breast Lesions: A Community Hospital's Experience

BACKGROUND

Most data comparing wire localized excision (WLE) and radioactive seed localized excision (RSLE) derive from academic institutions with limited data from community hospitals. This study aimed to compare positive margin rates between WLE and RSLE and to determine if there were any differences in specimen volume and operation time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent WLE or RSLE at a Canadian community hospital. Group characteristics were compared as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was used determine if the localization techniques were independently associated with having a positive margin. Statistical significance was set as P < .05.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 747 (WLE) and 577 (RSLE) patients. Both groups had similar mean age, mean tumor (invasive and ductal carcinoma-in-situ) size, histologic grade distribution, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and extensive intraductal component, nodal status, and hormone receptor and HER2 status. Compared to WLE, patients who underwent RSLE had significantly lower invasive positive margin rates (8.1% vs. 12.3%, P = .03), shorter operation time (39.5 minutes vs. 68.7 minutes, P = .0001), and smaller surgical specimens (21.4 cm³ vs. 30.2 cm³, P = .008). Ductal carcinoma-in-situ positive margin rates were not different between the groups. However, the localization technique was not independently associated with having a positive margin (odds ratio = 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.44).

CONCLUSION

RSLE led to a shorter operation time and smaller surgical specimens compared to WLE, but there was no difference in positive margin rates. RSLE is an effective technique to excise nonpalpable breast lesions in the community setting.

Clinical utility of radioactive seed localization in nonpalpable breast cancer: A retrospective single institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

With advances in mammographic screening techniques, it has become easier to detect nonpalpable breast lesions at an early stage. Pre-surgical localization of lesions by radioactive seed localization (RSL) has several benefits over conventional wire localization (WL) in guiding breast conserving surgery. In this study, we compared WL and RSL, focusing on the relationship between the techniques and in-breast recurrence or margin positivity.

METHODS

This study included 1083 patients with nonpalpable breast lesions who underwent breast conserving surgery between 2010 and 2015. The patients were classified into WL and RSL groups.

RESULTS

Margin positivity and in-breast recurrence rates did not differ significantly between the WL and RSL groups (P = 0.368 and P = 0.167, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade (OR: 5.016; 95% CI: 1.53-23.059) was significantly associated with margin positivity in patients undergoing RSL. Tumor size was significantly associated with in-breast recurrence in both the WL group (OR: 2.299; 95% CI: 1.561-3.411) and RSL group (OR: 2.998; 95% CI: 1.128-8.043).

CONCLUSION

As the method of tumor localization did not influence margin positivity or in-breast recurrence, either WL or RSL appear to be appropriate for breast conserving surgery. Given the advantages of RSL, including the ability to perform this technique days to weeks before surgery, we propose that high-volume breast centers consider adopting this localization method.

Compliance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Revised Licensing Guidance for Radioactive Seed Localization

The use of radioactive seed localization (RSL) as a reliable alternative to wire localization (WL) for guiding the surgical excision of non-palpable lesions has become more popular because of its demonstrated advantages for both the patient and surgeon. RSL is regulated under 10 CFR 35.1000 (Other Medical Uses) for which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) issued its original licensing guidance entitled "I-125 and Pd-103 Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy Seeds Used for Localization of Non-palpable Lesions" in 2006. At that time, RSL was performed as an off-label use of the same radioactive I seeds used for brachytherapy, so the focus of this initial guidance was to establish the same requirements for RSL as for brachytherapy. Strict compliance with the licensing guidance was burdensome and made it difficult for some licensees to implement an RSL program. In response to a request from the user community and recommendations from an Advisory Committee on the Medical Use of Isotopes (ACMUI) subcommittee, the U.S. NRC formed a working group to consider revisions to its RSL guidance to make it more relevant to the conduct of the procedure. On October 7, 2016, the U.S. NRC issued a revised licensing guidance document titled "Low Activity Radioactive Seeds Used for Localization of Non-Palpable Lesions and Lymph Nodes." This manuscript highlights the changes in the latest U.S. NRC licensing guidance for RSL, including authorized user training and experience, written directives, surveys, instrumentation, and medical event criteria, and presents practical ways to satisfy the new requirements.

Impact of Advancing Technology on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer

New emerging breast imaging techniques have shown great promise in breast cancer screening, evaluation of extent of disease, and response to neoadjuvant therapy. Tomosynthesis, allows 3-dimensional imaging of the breast, and increases breast cancer detection. Fast abbreviated MRI has reduced time and costs associated with traditional breast MRI while maintaining cancer detection. Diffusion-weighted imaging is a functional MRI technique that does not require contrast and has shown potential in screening, lesion characterization and also evaluation of treatment response. New image-guided preoperative localizations are available that have increased patient satisfaction and decreased operating room delays.

Preoperative Localization of Recurrence in the Thyroidectomy Bed Using a Radioactive Iodine125 Seed

Intraoperative localization of nonpalpable recurrent thyroid cancer has been reported using needle localization, intraoperative ultrasound (US), dye injection, and radio-guided surgery. We describe the alternative technique of radioactive seed localization (RSL) in 3 patients with residual or recurrent papillary thyroid cancer. This technique has been used for many years in the setting of nonpalpable breast cancer, where it has been shown to be safe and has been associated with greater surgeon satisfaction as well as improved patient tolerability, cosmesis, and outcomes compared to needle localization. In addition, RSL allows complete decoupling of the radiology and surgery schedules. RSL was successful in our 3 patients with regard to safety, patient tolerability, and scheduling.

Factors Associated With Positive Margins in Women Undergoing Breast Conservation Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors predicting positive margins at lumpectomy prompting intraoperative reexcision in patients with breast cancer treated at a large referral center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed all breast cancer lumpectomy cases managed at our institution from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013. Associations between rates of positive margin and patient and tumor factors were assessed using χ² tests and univariate and adjusted multivariate logistic regression, stratified by ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer.

RESULTS

We identified 382 patients who underwent lumpectomy for definitive surgical resection of breast cancer, 102 for DCIS and 280 for invasive cancer. Overall, 234 patients (61.3%) required intraoperative reexcision for positive margins. The reexcision rate was higher in patients with DCIS than in those with invasive disease (78.4% [80 of 102] vs 56.4% [158 of 280]; univariate odds ratio, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.66-4.76; P<.001). Positive margin rates did not vary by patient age, surgeon, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or ERBB2 status of the tumor. Among the 280 cases of invasive breast cancer, the only factor independently associated with lower odds of margin positivity was seed localization vs no localization (P=.03).

CONCLUSION

Ductal carcinoma in situ was associated with a higher rate of positive margins at lumpectomy than invasive breast cancer on univariate analysis. Within invasive disease, seed localization was associated with lower rates of margin positivity.

Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization

Screening mammography increases detection of non-palpable breast lesions requiring image-guided localization prior to surgery. Accurate preoperative localization is crucial for successful surgical outcomes. Wire-guided localization is currently the most widely used localization method for non-palpable breast lesions; however, this technique has multiple disadvantages including patient discomfort, possible wire transection and migration, suboptimal surgical incision placement due to wire location and limited scheduling flexibility decreasing operating room efficiency. As a result, promising new techniques including radioactive seed localization, non-radioactive radar localization and magnetic seed localization have been developed as alternatives. In this article, we provide an overview of these techniques and discuss their advantages, drawbacks and currently available outcome data.

Injectable iodine-125 labeled tissue marker for radioactive localization of non-palpable breast lesions

We have developed a ¹²⁵I-radiolabeled injectable fiducial tissue marker with the potential to replace current methods used for surgical guidance of non-palpable breast tumors. Methods in routine clinical use today such as radioactive seed localization, radio-guided occult lesion localization and wire-guided localization suffers from limitations that this injectable fiducial tissue marker offers solutions to. The developed ¹²⁵I-radiolabeled injectable fiducial tissue marker is based on highly viscous sucrose acetate isobutyrate. The marker was readily inserted in NMRI mice and proved to be spatially well-defined and stable over a seven day period with excellent CT contrast (>1500 HU), enabling fluoroscopic visualization of the marker during placement. The radioactivity remains strongly associated with the marker during the implantation period, which limits exposure to healthy tissue. Biodistribution studies show that there is negligible radioactivity in all non-tumor tissues sampled, with the exception of the thyroid gland, where limited accumulation was observed (0.06% of injected dose after 7 days). Based on the excellent performance of the marker and the fact that it can be delivered through thin hypodermic needles (≥27G), the marker holds great promise for clinical application, since patient discomfort is reduced significantly compared to current methods.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

A new type of tissue marker for local administration to non-palpable breast tumors has been developed. The surgical guidance marker is based on derivatives of the biomaterial sucrose acetate isobutyrate and unlike currently used markers it is injectable in the tissue using thin needles, reducing the discomfort to the patients significantly. The marker confers CT contrast and has radioactive properties, meaning it also could find use in brachytherapy. The design of the iodine-125 labeled fiducial tissue marker enables control of dosimetry as well as a choice of iodine isotope used. The marker is anticipated to be clinical applicable due to its contrast performance in mice and its potential for enhanced flexibility in surgical procedures, compared to current methods.

Assessment of Ultrasound / Radio-guided Occult Lesion Localization in Non-palpable Breast Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Controversy exists about the localization of non-palpable breast lesions. In many countries, the gold standard for the diagnosis of these lesions is needle localization due to its accuracy. This study sought to compare the ultrasound- and radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) as a simple method with the conventional procedures in terms of their diagnostic power.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 94 patients with non-palpable breast lesions detected by ultrasonography and localized by the combination of ultrasonography and using radiopharmaceuticals. One to ten hours prior to surgery, 0.1-0.2 ml (equivalent to 0.5-1 mCi) of Tc-99m-phytate was injected to the lesion under the guidance of ultrasonography. Then, the lesion was localized using a hand-held gamma probe, and excision of the lesion was performed according to its radioactivity signal. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, version 16.

RESULTS

Benign and malignant pathologic results were observed in 77 (81.9%) and 17(18.1%) of the patients, respectively, and the mean volume of the excised tissue was 26.29±27 mm³. 79 patients had a solitary lesion (84%), 55 in the left breast (58.5%) and 39 in superolateral quadrant (41.5%). The mean size of the lesions was 15.7 mm in diameter (ranging from 4 to 34 mm). Additionally, there was a need to secondary surgery in 3 (3.2%) patients and inappropriate localization in 6 (6.4%) patients (subcutaneous or intra-ductal spread of radiodrug).

CONCLUSION

Combination of ultrasound- and radio-guided localization methods for localizing non-palpable breast lesions is a simple and acceptable method for localization with no significant complications. For radio-drug spread and subsequent excessive excised tissue volume, subcutaneous and intra-ductal lesions are not suitable indication for ROLL.

Comparative Evaluation of Iodine-125 Radioactive Seed Localization and Wire Localization for Resection of Breast Lesions

Purpose

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) uses a titanium seed labeled with iodine-125 energy for surgery of nonpalpable breast lesions. RSL facilitates radiology–surgery scheduling and allows for improved oncoplasty compared with wire localization (WL). The purpose of this work was to compare the 2 techniques.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of all breast lesions operated with RSL between February 2013 and March 2015 at our university institution, and compared with an equivalent number of surgeries performed with a single WL. Imaging and pathology reports were reviewed for information on guidance mode, accuracy of targeting, nature of excised lesion, size and volume of surgical specimen, status of margins, and reinterventions.

Results

A total of 254 lesions (247 women) were excised with RSL and compared with 257 lesions (244 women) whose surgery was guided by WL. Both groups were comparable in lesion pathology, guidance mode for RSL or WL positioning, and accuracy of targeting (98% correct). Mean delay between biopsy and surgery was 84 days for RSL versus 103 after WL ( P = .04). No differences were noted after RSL or WL for surgical specimen mean weight, largest diameter, and volume excised. For malignancies, the rate of positive margins was comparable (2.8%-3%), with 5 of 10 women in the RSL group who underwent a second surgery displaying residual malignancy compared with 3 of 9 women in the WL group.

Conclusions

RSL is safe and accurate, and has comparable surgical endpoints to WL. Because RSL offers flexible scheduling and facilitated oncoplasty, RSL may replace WL for resection of nonpalpable single breast lesions.

Radioactive seed localization for breast conservation surgery: Low positive margin rate with no learning curve

BACKGROUND

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is an alternative to wire localization. We compared the rate of positive margins for evidence of a learning curve in implementing RSL.

METHODS

A retrospective review of RSL by three surgeons at a single institution from 2002 to 2016. Positive margins were defined as ink on tumor.

RESULTS

Surgeon experience with RSL for ranged from 142 to >500 cases. The positive margin rate among the first 100 of each surgeons' experience (n = 300) was 2.3% and the rate during the most recent up to 100 cases after experience with at least 100 RSL procedures (n = 242) was 4.1% (p = 0.32). Individual surgeon's positive margin rates ranged from 2 to 5% in the early experience and 2-7% in the later experience (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

RSL for breast conservation surgery has a low rate of positive margins even early in a surgeon's experience. Implementation of RSL can be done with no evidence of a learning curve.