Magnetic seed versus skin tattoo localization of non-palpable breast lesions: a single institution cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy and feasibility of magnetic seed compared to skin tattoo in preoperative localization of impalpable breast lesions in terms of accuracy of placement, re-excision and positive margins rates, and breast/surgical specimen volume ratio.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients who underwent breast conservative surgery in our center from November 2020 to November 2021, with previous localization with skin tattoo or magnetic seed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven magnetic seeds were placed in 36 patients (48.6%) and 40 skin tattoos were performed in the remaining cases (51.4%). The seeds were placed correctly at the two-view mammogram acquired after the insertion in 97.6% (36/37) of cases. With both methods, 100% of the index lesions were completely removed and found in the surgical specimen. The reported re-excision rate was 0% for both groups. A significant difference was observed in the volume of breast parenchyma removed between the two groups, inferior in the seed group (p = 0.046), especially in case of voluminous breasts (p = 0.003) and small lesions (dimension < 8 mm, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic seed is a non-radioactive localization technique, feasible to place, recommended in case of non-palpable breast lesions, saving the breast parenchyma removed compared with skin tattoo, without reducing the accuracy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our findings contribute to the current evidence on preoperative localization techniques for non-palpable breast lesions, highlighting the efficacy of magnetic seed localization for deep and small lesions.

KEY POINTS

• Magnetic seed is a non-radioactive technique for the preoperative localization of non-palpable breast lesions studied in comparison with skin tattoo. • Magnetic seed is feasible to place in terms of post-placement migration and distance from the target lesion. • Magnetic seed is recommended in case of non-palpable breast lesions, saving the breast parenchyma removed without reducing the accuracy.

An Innovative Scoring System to Select the Optimal Surgery in Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The selection of surgery post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is difficult and based on surgeons' expertise. The aim of this study was to create a post-NEoadjuvant Score System (pNESSy) to choose surgery, optimizing oncological and aesthetical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (stage I-III) underwent surgery post-NACT (breast-conserving surgery (BCS), oncoplastic surgery (OPS), and conservative mastectomy (CMR) were included. Data selected were BRCA mutation, ptosis, breast volume, radiological response, MRI, and mammography pre- and post-NACT prediction of excised breast area. pNESSy was created using the association between these data and surgery. Area under the curve (AUC) was assessed. Patients were divided into groups according to correspondence (G1) or discrepancy (G2) between score and surgery; oncological and aesthetic outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients were included (118 BCS, 49 OPS, 88 CMR). pNESSy between 6.896-8.724 was predictive for BCS, 8.725-9.375 for OPS, and 9.376-14.245 for CMR; AUC was, respectively, 0.835, 0.766, and 0.825. G1 presented a lower incidence of involved margins (5-14.7%; p = 0.010), a better locoregional disease-free survival (98.8-88.9%; p < 0.001) and a better overall survival (96.1-86.5%; p = 0.017), and a better satisfaction with breasts (39.8-27.5%; p = 0.017) and physical wellbeing (93.5-73.6%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A score system based on clinical and radiological features was created to select the optimal surgery post-NACT and improve oncological and aesthetic outcomes.

Pathologic response and residual tumor cellularity after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy predict prognosis in breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Residual tumor cellularity (RTC) and pathologic complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are prognostic factors associated with improved outcomes in breast cancer (BC). However, the majority of patients achieve partial pathologic response (pPR) and no clear correlation between RTC patterns and outcomes was described. Our aims were to define predictive factors for pCR and compare different outcomes of patients with pCR or pPR and with different RTC patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline and post-NAC demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, post-operative data, survival and recurrence status were recorded from our institutional database. A multivariable analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of pCR. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Overall, of the 495 patients analyzed, 148 (29.9%) achieved pCR, 347 (70.1%) had pPR, and the median RTC was 40%. Multivariable analysis identified 3 independent factors predictive of pCR: tumor stage before NAC (cT1-2 84.5% versus cT3-4 15.5%), BC sub-type (HER2-positive 54.7% versus triple-negative 29.8% versus luminal-like 15.5%), and vascular invasion (absence 98.0% versus presence 2.0%). We found statistically significant longer DFS, DDFS, and OS in patients with pCR and with RTC <40%; no difference was observed in terms of OS between RTC <40% and RTC ≥40% groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor stage before NAC, BC sub-type, and vascular invasion are significant and independent factors associated with pCR. Patients with pCR and with RTC <40% have longer DFS, DDFS, and OS compared with patients with pPR.

Local Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Is Mastectomy Superior to Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive type of breast cancer that lacks the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC accounts for about 15% of breast cancers and has a poorer prognosis as compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. The more rapid onset of this cancer and its aggressiveness have often convinced breast surgeons that mastectomy could provide better oncological results. However, there is no relevant clinical trial that has assessed differences between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (M) in these patients. This population-based study aimed to investigate the distinct outcomes between conservative treatment and M in a case series of 289 patients with TNBC treated over a 9-year period. This monocentric study retrospectively evaluated patients with TNBC who underwent upfront surgery at Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, in Rome, between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2021. First, the patients were divided in two groups according to the surgical treatment received: BCS vs. M. Then, the patients were stratified into four risk subclasses based on combined T and N pathological staging (T1N0, T1N+, T2-4N0 and T2-4N+). The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate locoregional disease-free survival (LR-DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) in the different subclasses. We analyzed 289 patients that underwent either breast-conserving surgery (247/289, 85.5%) or mastectomy (42/289, 14.5%). After a median follow-up of 43.2 months (49.7, 22.2-74.3), 28 patients (9.6%) developed a locoregional recurrence, 27 patients (9.0%) showed systemic recurrence and 19 patients (6.5%) died. No significant differences due to type of surgical treatment were observed in the different risk subclasses in terms of locoregional disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival and overall survival. With the limits of a retrospective, single-center study, our data seem to indicate similar efficacy in terms of locoregional control, distant metastasis and overall survival with the use of upfront breast-conserving surgery as compared with radical surgery in the treatment of TNBC. Therefore, TNBC should not be considered to be a contraindication for breast conservation.

Conservative Surgery in cT4 Breast Cancer: Single-Center Experience in the Neoadjuvant Setting

BACKGROUND

The diffusion of screening programs has resulted in a decrease of cT4 breast cancer diagnosis. The standard care for cT4 was neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), surgery, and locoregional or adjuvant systemic therapies. NA allows two outcomes: 1. improve survival rates, and 2. de-escalation of surgery. This de-escalation has allowed the introduction of conservative breast surgery (CBS). We evaluate the possibility of submitting cT4 patients to CBS instead of radical breast surgery (RBS) by assessing the risk of locoregional disease-free survival, (LR-DFS) distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This monocentric, retrospective study evaluated cT4 patients submitted to NA and surgery between January 2014 and July 2021. The study population included patients undergoing CBS or RBS without immediate reconstruction. Survival curves were obtained using the Kaplan-Meyer method and compared using a Log Rank test.

RESULTS

At a follow-up of 43.7 months, LR-DFS was 70% and 75.9%, respectively, in CBS and RBS (p = 0.420). DDFS was 67.8% and 29.7%, respectively, (p = 0.122). OS was 69.8% and 59.8%, respectively, (p = 0.311).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with major or complete response to NA, CBS can be considered a safe alternative to RBS in the treatment of cT4a-d stage. In patients with poor response to NA, RBS remained the best surgical choice.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Clinical Experience with Node-Negative and Node-Positive Disease Prior to Systemic Therapy

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as the standard procedure to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). SLNB is accepted in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients; however, its role in clinically node-positive (cN+) patients is debatable. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of BC patients undergoing NAC and SLNB. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of SLNB in the setting of NAC. This was accomplished by comparing the characteristics and oncological outcomes between cN0 and cN+ patients prior to NAC and type of axillary surgery. Results: A total of 291 patients were included in the analysis: 131 were cN0 and 160 were cN+ who became ycN0 after NAC. At a median follow-up of 43 months, axillary recurrence occurred in three cN0 (2.3%) and two cN+ (1.3%) patients. However, there were no statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes (disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, overall survival, and breast-cancer-specific survival) between cN0 and cN+ patients nor between patients treated with SLNB only or ALND. Conclusions: SLNB in the setting of NAC is an acceptable procedure with a general good prognosis and low axillary failure rates for both cN0 and cN+ patients.

Abstract P1-09-09: Salvage mastectomy is not always necessary for aggressive subtypes of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: A single-institution retrospective study

Introduction: Patients with triple-negative (TN) or HER2-enriched ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR) seem to be excluded from a second breast-conserving surgery (BCS) under the assumption that salvage mastectomy would provide better oncological outcomes. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical features of these patients, to compare the two surgical alternatives (salvage mastectomy versus second BCS) in terms of oncological results, and to identify independent factors influencing prognosis and surgical treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all the consecutive patients with histologically confirmed TN or HER2-enriched IBCR. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: Eighty-five patients were affected by TN or HER2-enriched IBCR, with a median age of 60 years (range, 32-87 years). The majority of patients (72.9%) were treated with salvage mastectomy. There was no significant difference in terms of DFS between patients receiving a second BCS or mastectomy (p=0.596). However, patients undergoing a second BCS had significantly better DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to mastectomy (p=0.009; p=0.002; p=0.001, respectively). Tumor dimension &lt; 16 mm (78.3% versus 38.7%, hazard ratio (HR)=3.602, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.534-8.459, p=0.003) was found to significantly increase the probability of receiving a second BCS and positively affects recurrence and survival outcomes (DFS: HR=8.065, 95% CI=2.320-28.034, p=0.001; DDFS: HR=17.011, 95% CI=3.853-75.099, p=0.001; OS: HR: 13.881, 95% CI=2.730-70.579, p=0.002; BCSS: HR=36.773, 95% CI=4.579-295.322, p=0.001). Second BCS represents an independent protective factor for OS and BCSS (OS: HR=0.246, 95% CI=0.027-0.697, p=0.002; BCSS: HR=0.313, 95% CI=0.092-0.511, p=0.002). Conclusion: Salvage mastectomy is not always necessary and it does not seem to increase survival compared to a second BCS. This reinforces the concept that the prognosis of TN and HER2-enriched BC recurrence is mainly driven by the biology of the disease, rather than by the extent of surgery. In patients with small (&lt; 16 mm) aggressive subtypes of IBCR, a second conservative approach can still be evaluated and offered, presenting acceptable loco-regional control and survival.

Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Andrea Sagona, Erika Barbieri, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Ruggero Spoto, Davide Franceschini, Stefano Vaccari, Valeriano Vinci, Ersilia Biondi, Lorenzo Scardina, Corrado Tinterri. Salvage mastectomy is not always necessary for aggressive subtypes of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: A single-institution retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-09.

Abstract P6-01-32: Evaluation of pathologic response and residual tumor cellularity following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy predict prognosis in breast cancer patients

Introduction: Treatment of early-stage beast cancer (BC) has changed since recent evidence showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can reduce residual tumor cellularity (RTC) and improve patient outcomes. Achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) has been associated with significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). However, among patients treated with NAC, few experience pCR, while approximately 60-80% of them achieve a pathologic partial response (pPR). In previous studies, BC patients with different grades of pPR have been usually grouped and analyzed together, with inconsistent results and unclear prognostic significance. Objectives: The primary aims of this study were to describe the clinical and treatment characteristics of BC patients treated with NAC, to identify independent predictive factors of pCR, and to compare the oncologic outcomes between patients achieving pCR or pPR. The secondary aim of this study was to measure the RTC of BC patients with pPR and to compare the outcomes of patients with different RTC in order to improve prognostic information. Methods: All the consecutive BC patients undergoing NAC at the Breast Unit of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (Milan, Italy) between October 2006 and April 2020 and their corresponding post-operative pathology slides were reviewed. The following exclusion criteria were used: excisional biopsy or debulking surgery as first BC operation, patients with a previous BC diagnosis or other prior or synchronous malignancies, male patients, unknown NAC regimen, disease progression during NAC, and follow-up ≤12 months. Results: A total of 495 BC patients received NAC. Overall, 148 (29.9%) patients achieved pCR, while 347 (70.1%) had pPR, and median RTC was 40%. At multivariable analysis, 3 independent factors predicting pCR were identified. Tumor stage pre-NAC (cT1-2 84.5% versus cT3-4 15.5%, odds ratio (OR)=0.119, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.048-0.189, p=0.001), BC sub-type (HER2-enriched 54.7% versus triple-negative 29.8% versus luminal-like 15.5%, OR=2.178, 95%CI=2.055-2.301, p=0.001), and vascular invasion (absence 98.0% versus presence 2.0%, OR=0.022, 95%CI=0.004-0.090, p=0.001). Patients with BC undergoing NAC and achieving pCR presented statistically significant longer DFS, DDFS, and OS (p = &lt; 0.001). Patients with RTC &lt; 40% presented statistically significant better DFS and DDFS (p = 0.033, p = 0.015, respectively). However, no statistically significant difference in terms of OS was observed between RTC &lt; 40% and RTC ≥40% groups (p = 0.148). Conclusions: Tumor stage pre-NAC, BC sub-type, and vascular invasion are significantly and independently associated with pCR. Patients with pCR present a better prognosis compared to patients with pPR in terms of DFS, DDFS, and OS. Measurement of RTC in BC patients with pPR improves the prognostic information that can be obtained from the assessment of the pathologic response. Different patterns of residual disease play an important role in predicting the risk of subsequent loco-regional and distant recurrence, and patients with RTC &lt; 40% present significantly better DFS and DDFS.

Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Andrea Sagona, Camilla De Carlo, Bethania Fernandes, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Erika Barbieri, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Lorenzo Scardina, Ersilia Biondi, Flavia Jacobs, Giulia Vatteroni, Corrado Tinterri. Evaluation of pathologic response and residual tumor cellularity following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy predict prognosis in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-01-32.

Paget’s disease of the breast: Our 20 years’ experience

Introduction

Paget’s disease (PD) represents 1%–3% of all breast cancers and mostly occurs in postmenopausal women. Multiple studies have confirmed that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is a safe option for patients with in situ or invasive PD, ensuring local control and survival rates similar to those achieved with mastectomy.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 115 patients affected by PD treated in our institution between January 2000 and May 2021. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years and median follow-up was 82 months; 69 patients were treated with BCS and 46 were treated with modified radical mastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy.

Results

At histological examination, 59 patients (59/115, 51.0%) had an underlying invasive carcinoma; in 11 patients (11/115, 9.0%), only PD was found. In 45 patients (45/115, 40.0%), only noninvasive cancer was found. Nine patients (9/115, 7.8%) developed a local recurrence, 7 patients (7/115, 6.0%) are alive with distant metastasis, and 10 patients (10/115, 8.6%) died.

Discussion

In our series, no statistically significant differences were shown between PD alone, PD associated with in situ cancer, and PD with invasive cancer, regardless of the surgical procedure. BCS followed by radiotherapy appears to be an effective and safe option for patients with PD.

Conclusion

PD is a rare form of breast cancer and, in half of the cases, is associated with an invasive carcinoma. Separating our sample into three subgroups based on tumor histology, there were no significant differences in terms of LC, DFS, and OS rate in patients treated with different types of surgery. This study presents some limitations due to its retrospective nature and being confined to a single institution.

Efficacy and Accuracy of Using Magnetic Seed for Preoperative Non-Palpable Breast Lesions Localization: Our Experience with Magseed

In this retrospective study we share our single-center experience using a magnetic seed for the preoperative localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Patients who underwent a preoperative localization with Magseed^® (Endomagnetics, Cambridge, UK) placement between 2020 and 2022 were enrolled. Indications to Magseed placement have been established during multidisciplinary meetings prior to surgery and all patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). 45 patients were included. Magnetic seeds have been introduced under ultrasound guidance in 40 patients (88.9%) and under stereotactic guidance in 5 patients (11.1%). We registered a highly successful placement rate (97.8%), with only one case of migration (2.2%). After BCS, all the magnetic seeds were recovered (100% retrieval rate). The re-excision rate for positive margins was 0%. Our experience, with a highly successful placement and retrieval rate and a re-excision rate equal to 0%, is consistent with the encouraging literature published on Magseed so far, suggesting this technique to be extremely effective. Moreover, our single case of seed migration supports the existing data stating that Magseed migration is rare. In conclusion, despite acknowledging Magseed limitations, we highly value the advantages linked to this technique, and we, therefore, uphold its use.

Prepectoral vs. Submuscular Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Our Early Experience

Background: Conservative mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR) is an oncologically accepted technique that offers improved esthetic results and patient quality of life. Traditionally, implants have been placed in a submuscular (SM) plane beneath the pectoralis major muscle (PMM). Recently, prepectoral (PP) placement of the prosthesis has been increasingly used in order to avoid morbidities related to manipulation of the PMM. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of SM vs. PP IPBR after conservative mastectomy in patients with histologically proven breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed two cohorts of patients that underwent mastectomy with IPBR after NAC in our institution from January 2018 to December 2021. Conservative mastectomy was performed in 146 of the 400 patients that underwent NAC during the study period. Patients were divided into two groups based on the positioning of implants: 56 SM versus 90 PP. Results: The two cohorts were similar for age (mean age 42 and 44 years in the SM and PP group respectively) and follow-up (33 and 20 months, respectively). Mean operative time was 56 min shorter in the PP group (300 and 244 min in the SM and PP group). No significant differences were observed in overall major complication rates. Implant loss was observed in 1.78% of patients (1/56) in the SM group and 1.11% of patients (1/90) in PP group. No differences were observed between the two groups in local or regional recurrence. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience, which represents one of the largest series of patients undergoing PP-IPBR after NAC at a single institution documented in the literature, seems to confirm that PP-IPBR after NAC is a safe, reliable and effective alternative to traditional SM-IPBR with excellent esthetic and oncological outcomes; it is easy to perform, reduces operative time and minimizes complications related to manipulation of PPM. However, this promising results need to be confirmed in prospective trials with longer follow-up.

Mastectomy and immediate prepectoral versus submuscular breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Our early experience

e12618

Background: Conservative mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR) is an oncologically accepted technique that allows to improve aesthetic results and patient quality of life. Traditionally, implants have been placed in a submuscolar (SM) plane beneath the pectoralis major muscle (PMM). Recently, prepectoral (PP) placement of prosthesis is increasingly used in order to avoid morbidities related to manipulation of PMM. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of SM vs PP IPBR after conservative mastectomy in patients with histologically proven breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: In this retrospective observational study we analyzed two cohorts of patients that underwent mastectomy with IPBR after NAC in our Istitution from January 2018 to December 2021. Conservative mastectomy was performed in 155 of the 400 patients that underwent NAC during the study period. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on the positioning of implants: 60 SM versus 95 PP. Results: The two cohorts were similar for age (mean age 45 and 42 years in the SM and PP group respectively) and follow‐up (32 and 21 months, respectively). Mean operative time was 55 minutes shorter in the PP group (298 and 243 minutes in the SM and PP group). No significant differences were observed in overall major complication rates. Implant loss occurred was observed in 1.6% of patients (1/60) in the SM group and 1,05% of patients (1/95) in PP group. No differences were observed among the two groups in local or regional recurrence. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience, that represents one of the largest series of PP-IPBR after NAC at a single Institution documented in the Literature, seems to confirm that PP - IPBR after NAC is a safe, reliable and effective alternative to traditional SM - IPBR with excellent aesthetic and oncological outcomes; it is easy to perfom, reduces operative time and minimizes complications related to manipolation of PPM. However this promising results need to be confirmed in prospective trials with longer follow-up.

Vitamin D and Histological Features of Breast Cancer: Preliminary Data from an Observational Retrospective Italian Study

Background: Vitamin D (vitD) may be involved in different extraskeletal conditions as well as skeletal muscle diseases. It has been hypothesized that, at least in part, a low level of vitD could contribute to facilitating cancer development. Breast cancer (BC) seems to be associated with low levels of vitD. Materials and methods: This was an observational retrospective evaluation of 87 women (mean age: 54 ± 12 years old) who underwent surgery for the treatment of BC. Our main purpose was to correlate the types of BC and the levels of vitD. Results: A positive significant correlation (R > 0.7) was found between non-invasive carcinoma in situ and 25(OH)D levels and age (R = 0.82, p < 0.05). A positive, but nonsignificant, correlation was reported between invasive ductal carcinoma and 25(OH)D and age (R = 0.45, p > 0.05). A negative but nonsignificant correlation was found between invasive lobular carcinoma and 25(OH)D and age (R = 0.24, p > 0.05). Discussion and Conclusions: We did not find a significant relationship between vitD and BC subtypes. Considering the positive significant correlation between vitD levels and age for in situ BC, although preliminary, our results seem to suggest a possible role of vitD in in situ BC. However, these findings need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Multidisciplinary management of mammary Paget's disease: recommendations to optimize oncological and aesthetic outcomes

We read with interest the article of Francesca Maria Plutino entitled "A peculiar case of Paget's disease of the breast" and would like to make some considerations about this particular topic 1. Mammary Paget's Disease (MPD) or Paget's disease of the breast is an uncommon pathology which accounts for less than 5% of breast cancers 1-3. MPD occurs with alterations of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) such as redness, eczema, bleeding ulceration and usually itching 1-3. In the era of personalized care, a careful multidisciplinary management is mandatory to optimize the results and minimize the risk of overtreatment 4; an adequate knowledge of the MPD, surgical skills and use of appropriate adjuvant therapies allow to reduce the risk of local recurrence and improve the aesthetic outcomes and patient's quality of life; however, a successful work can be more easily achieved thanks to the repetitive performance of some standardized tasks, such as 5: - an accurate radiological preoperative assessment with mammography and ultrasonography is important to identify associated glandular lesions; an underlying breast carcinoma (in situ and/or invasive) may be present up to about 80% to 90% of MPD although often without an evident breast mass or mammographic abnormality (2,5); therefore, all patients with MPD should also perform a magnetic resonance imaging to detect possible underlying occult breast carcinoma and define the true extent of disease 5,6; - a pathological diagnosis should be early established by nipple scrape cytology when a MPD is clinically suspected; full-thickness punch or wedge biopsy of the NAC may be necessary to accurately diagnose MPD; the histological examination must detect malignant intraepithelial carcinoma cells, also known as "Paget cells", in the epidermis of the NAC 2,3; a needle biopsy is also required for any suspicious glandular lesion identified by imaging and associated with MPD 5; - a multidisciplinary "Surgery Board" is mandatory to select the more adequate local treatment for the patient: breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) is the optimal local treatment when a NAC resection and wide local excision of any underlying cancer allows to achieve tumour-free margins and appropriate aesthetic outcomes 4,5,7; the oncoplastic techniques with the remodelling of breast tissue and placement of clips within the excision cavity as a landmark to guide adjuvant RT should always be used in BCS in order to optimize oncological and cosmetic results 5,8,9,10. Instead, skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction is indicated for MPD associated to multicentric or extensive carcinoma, inadequate margins after BCS, contraindications to adjuvant RT and patient preference 5,8. Staging and surgical treatment of the axilla in MPD is based on the possible presence of underlying cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLB) is not necessary when BCS is used to treat pure MPD or MPD associate with ductal carcinoma in situ; SLB must be performed when MPD is associated with underlying invasive cancer and treated with breast-conserving surgery; SLB is always recommended when a mastectomy is performed in order to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection in case an invasive component is revealed at final pathology of the gland (mastectomy precludes subsequent use of SLB) 5,7,8; - a multidisciplinary "Tumor Board" is crucial to choose the adjuvant treatment; whole breast radiation should be always performed after BCS and a radiation boost should be considered for the site of the resected NAC and any associated resected cancer site 2,4,5; adjuvant systemic therapies in patients with MPD should be based on biological features and the stage of the underlying cancer; no data are available to support the use of endocrine therapy in the MPD without an associated DCIS or invasive carcinoma 5. In conclusion, a dedicated multidisciplinary pathway with meticulous repetitive performance of some specific tasks could help to perform a successful work while optimizing oncological and aesthetic outcomes in patients with MPD.

Nipple sparing mastectomy with prepectoral immediate prosthetic reconstruction without acellular dermal matrices: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR) is an oncologically accepted technique that allows to improve aesthetic results and patient quality of life. Traditionally, implant for reconstruction have been placed in a submuscolar (SM) plane, beneath the pectoralis major muscle (PMM). Recently, prepectoral (PP) placement of prosthesis is increasingly used in order to avoid morbidities related to manipulation of PMM. The aim of the present study was to report our experience with 209 NSMs and IPBR using a prepectoral approach and polyurethane-coated implant without acellular dermal matrices (ADMs).

METHODS

A retrospective review of breast cancer patients who underwent NSM followed by PP - IPBR from January 2018 to April 2021 was performed. Data were recorded in order to evaluate operative details, major complications and oncological outcomes. Aesthetic results and patient quality of life were measured by a specific "QOL assessment PRO" survey.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nine patients (269 breasts) with PP - IPBR after NSM were included. Mean age was 47 (25-73) years and median follow-up was 14 (1-40) months. A simultaneous contralateral implant-based mammoplasty of symmetrization after unilateral NSM was carried out in six of 149 (4%) patients. Implant loss was observed in three of 209 patient (1.44%); two of 209 (0.96%) patients developed a full-thickness NAC necrosis that required excision. During follow-up one local relapse (0.48%) and two regional nodes recurrences (0,96%) was observed. Patient satisfaction, assessed using a personalized QOL Assessment PRO survey, in term of aesthetic results, chronic pain, shoulder dysfunction, sports activity, sexual and relationship life and skin sensibility, was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that PP-IPBR using polyurethane-coated implant after NSM is a safe, reliable and effective alternative to traditional IPBR with excellent aesthetic outcomes and high patient quality of life; it is easy to perform, minimizes complications related to manipulation of PPM and reduces operative time while resulting also in a cost-effective technique.

Surgical management of BRCA pathogenic variant carriers with breast cancer: a recent literature review and current state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management of breast cancer patients carrying pathogenic variants (PV) on breast cancer genes (BRCA) 1 and 2 has changed throughout the last decade due to growing availability of genetic testing, and has shifted towards the diffusion of bilateral mastectomy. Today's scenario however is in further evolution because of emerging data that suggest a personalized modulation of treatment. In this work we aimed to gather recent evidence supporting a prophylactic or conservative surgical approach in order to define the state of the art in today's treatment of BRCA carriers with breast cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We reviewed the literature to identify studies providing evidence on surgical treatment in breast cancer patients with BRCA 1 and 2 PVs. We included articles comparing outcomes between patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy, and articles investigating contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM), with a particular focus on recent literature. International guidelines were also reviewed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Optimal surgical management of BRCA PV carriers with breast cancer remains controversial. While the introduction of routine genetic testing has initially led surgeons to favor more radical treatments, recent literature provides evidence that a conservative approach is safe and feasible in selected cases. Guidelines are heterogeneous and provide guidance without constraining the surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should undergo adequate genetic and surgical counseling in order to receive the best tailored surgical treatment. Because guidelines vary in different countries and provide no definite protocol, they highlight the importance of accurate surgical planning. Clinical, familial and psychosocial factors should be taken into account when approaching a BRCA PV carrier with breast cancer, in order to guarantee the best evidence-based patient care in an era of personalized treatment.

Myofibroblastoma of the breast: two case reports and literature review

Myofibroblastoma (MFB) is a relatively rare tumor of the breast parenchyma, which belongs to the family of the 'benign stromal tumor of the breast'. Two cases of MFB of the breast are described. Radiological imaging is nonspecific in MFB, and pathological examination of needle biopsy or surgically resected specimen is necessary for the diagnosis. Surgery is recommended and considered curative without additional treatment; however, patients should be followed-up.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: An Advanced Personalized Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation Model (APMP-M) to Optimize Outcomes

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being employed in the management of breast cancer patients. Efforts and resources have been devoted over the years to the search for an optimal strategy that can improve outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting. Today, a multidisciplinary approach with the application of evidence-based medicine is considered the gold standard for the improvement of oncological results and patient satisfaction. However, several clinical complications and psychological issues due to various factors can arise during neoadjuvant therapy and undermine outcomes. To ensure that health care needs are adequately addressed, clinicians must consider that women with breast cancer have a high risk of developing "unmet needs" during treatment, and often require a clinical intervention or additional care resources to limit possible complications and psychological issues that can occur during neoadjuvant treatment. This work describes a multidisciplinary model developed at "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli" (FPG) in Rome in an effort to optimize treatment, ease the application of evidence-based medicine, and improve patient quality of life in the neoadjuvant setting. In developing our model, our main goal was to adequately meet patient needs while preventing high levels of distress.

Image-Guided Localization Techniques for Surgical Excision of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: An Overview of Current Literature and Our Experience with Preoperative Skin Tattoo

Breast conserving surgery has become the standard of care and is more commonly performed than mastectomy for early stage breast cancer, with recent studies showing equivalent survival and lower morbidity. Accurate preoperative lesion localization is mandatory to obtain adequate oncological and cosmetic results. Image guidance assures the precision requested for this purpose. This review provides a summary of all techniques currently available, ranging from the classic wire positioning to the newer magnetic seed localization. We describe the procedures and equipment necessary for each method, outlining the advantages and disadvantages, with a focus on the cost-effective preoperative skin tattoo technique performed at our centre. Breast surgeons and radiologists have to consider ongoing technological developments in order to assess the best localization method for each individual patient and clinical setting.

Update on sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patient

Today, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered the gold standard for axillary staging in early breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0). SLNB allows to determine the axillary lymph node status sparing the axillary dissection (AD) and its potential complications (seroma formation, loss of sensation, shoulder dysfunction and lymphedema) On the other hand, SLNB for nodal staging in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ycN0) is a highly debated topic due to different reported success rates. In order to optimize oncological results, high identification rate (> 90%) and false negative rate as low as possible (< 10%) should always be obtained when performing SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The success rates of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) mainly depend on the clinical lymph node status pre-NAC. In patients with pre-NAC clinically negative nodes (cN0) and at restaging with post-NAC clinically negative nodes (ycN0), SLNB after chemotherapy should be performed because it is an accurate and safe procedure. In patients with pre-NAC clinically positive nodes (cN+) and at restaging with post-NAC clinically negative nodes (ycN0), SLNB after chemotherapy might be considered thanks to the high lymph nodal pathologic complete response rate; however, in this last setting, individual ability, technical skills and repetitive performance of specific tasks must always be followed to improve the identification rate and false negative rate. AD may be avoided only if sentinel lymph node is negative [ypN0(sn)]; instead, to date, patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, even with only isolated tumor cells, [ypN+(sn) including ypN0i+(sn) and ypN1mic(sn)] should always be treated with AD. However, NAC significantly increases the difficulties and complexity of axillary surgical management. A personalized multidisciplinary path in specialized breast centers should ensure an accurate clinical counselling and refined patient selection for SLNB post-NAC. KEY WORDS: Axillary treatment, Breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Update on the surgical management of breast cancer

The surgical management of breast cancer has undergone continuous and profound changes over the last three decades. For patients with early stage breast cancer, breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy has been definitively validated as a safe alternative to radical mastectomy, with similar survival rates, better cosmetic outcomes and acceptable rates of local recurrence. Thanks to the improvements in diagnostic work-up, as well as the wider diffusion of screening programs and efforts in patient and physician education, tumors are more often detected at an early stage, furtherly facilitating the widespread use of breast conserving techniques. Breast-conserving surgery has been introduced also in the treatment of patients with locally advanced tumors after tumor downsizing with preoperative chemotherapy, with acceptable rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. When performing breast-conserving surgery all efforts should be made to ensure negative surgical margins in order minimize the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence as they are associated with worse distant-disease-free and breast cancer- specific survival rates. The recent introduction of "oncoplastic techniques", that may allow more extensive excisions of the breast without compromising the cosmetic results, has furtherly increased the use of breast-conserving procedures. Mastectomy remains a valid surgical alternative in selected cases and is usually associated with immediate reconstructive procedures. Staging of the axilla has also gradually evolved toward less aggressive approaches with the adoption of sentinel node biopsy, but several controversies still remain about completion of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with a pathologic positivity in sentinel lymph node biopsy. The present work will highlight the benefits and unresolved issues of the different surgical treatment options in breast cancer and axillary treatment.