The predictive value of incidental PET/CT findings suspicious for breast cancer in women with non-breast malignancies

Unexpected focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in main organs; pass through or pass by?

Since the inception of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) utilizing F-18 FDG has become widely accepted as a valuable imaging modality in the field of oncology, with global prevalence in clinical practice. Given that a single Torso PET/CT scan encompasses the anatomical region from the skull base to the upper thigh, the detection of incidental abnormal focal hypermetabolism in areas of limited clinical interest is both feasible and not uncommon. Numerous investigations have been undertaken to delineate the distinctive features of these findings, yet the outcomes have proven inconclusive. The incongruent results of these studies present a challenge for physicians, leaving them uncertain about the appropriate course of action. This article provides a succinct overview of the characteristics of fluorodeoxyglucose, followed by a comprehensive discussion of the imaging findings and clinical significance associated with incidental focal abnormal F-18 FDG activity in several representative organs. In conclusion, while the prevalence of unrecognized malignancy varies across organs, malignancies account for a substantial proportion, ranging from approximately one-third to over half, of incidental focal uptake. In light of these rates, physicians are urged to exercise vigilance in not disregarding unexpected uptake, facilitating more assured clinical decisions, and advocating for further active evaluation.

Clinical-Diagnostic Relevance of Breast "Incidentaloma" Detected During 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Correlation with Radiological Imaging and Histopathology

Aim:

This study aims to study the clinical-diagnostic relevance of incidental breast uptake (“incidentaloma”) on 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan performed for other indications and to correlate it with radiological imaging and histopathology.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated 3675 FDG-PET scans, identifying 43 patients with breast “incidentaloma.” Thirty of these findings were further investigated with clinical examination, mammography (MMX), UltraSound (US) and/or magnetic resonance (MR). Cases suspected for malignancy underwent US-guided macro-biopsy (USMB) or MR-guided biopsy. Correlations between FDG-PET, radiology findings, age, and histopathology were evaluated.

Results:

patients who performed both US and MMX were 19. Ten consequently underwent USMB, one MR-guided biopsy, the remaining 8 were not further investigated. Nine patients had a diagnosis of malignancy. Among 11 patients who performed only US and consequently, USMB 6 had a diagnosis of malignancy. Histopathology of the 22 patients with both morphological and glucometabolic alterations showed different types of benign or malignant neoplasia, with a cumulative 68.2% incidence of malignancy. Seven lesions showed a SUV_max >2.5, while the remaining 15 a SUV_max <2.5. There was no statistically significant correlation between SUV_max and histology, therefore SUV_max parameter should not be used to discriminate between benign and malignant findings. No significant correlation between patient age and tumor characterization was found.

Conclusions:

incidental mammary uptake during an FDG-PET scan may represent a clue suggesting to investigate PET findings. In this subset of patients, early diagnosis may lead to a change in clinical management with a favorable impact on prognosis and a significant reduction in healthcare costs.

The frequency and malignancy rate of incidental focal breast lesions identified by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency and malignancy rate of incidental focal uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the breast on PET/computed tomography (CT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All PET/CT scan reports from a single institution from 2010 to 2017 were electronically searched for words or phrases related to FDG uptake in the breast. Potentially eligible PET/CT scans were manually reviewed for the presence of focal incidental findings in the breast, and a final diagnosis was established based on pathology, clinical examinations, and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 19 551 PET/CT scans were reviewed, from which 66 patients (0.3%) presented with unexpected focal FDG-avid lesions of the breast. Fifty-three patients (80.3%) had follow-up evaluations. The final diagnosis showed malignancies in 38 patients. Thirty-four patients had biopsy-verified cancer (primary breast cancers, n = 30; metastasis, n = 4), and four patients with known lymphoma showed a tumour response in the breast after chemotherapy. The malignancy rate was 85.0% among patients who underwent biopsy (34 of 40 patients). The SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with a final malignant diagnosis (n = 38) than in those with a benign diagnosis (n = 15) (4.5 ± 2.9 vs. 2.7 ± 1.3, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Incidental uptake of FDG in the breast was rare. However, the malignancy rate was high among these patients, particularly among patients who had a follow-up biopsy. We recommend biopsy or thorough follow-up in patients with incidental focal uptake of FDG in the breast.

Correlation Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings and BI-RADS Assessment Using Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Breast Lesions: A Multicenter Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To analyze the correlation between ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category and fluorodeoxyglucose [¹⁸F] (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings and their value in breast lesion diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases involving hypermetabolic lesions identified by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between the maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) of the lesions and the BI-RADS grades was calculated. Histologic diagnosis or evidence at the end of a 2-year follow-up as the standard of truth were analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of the diagnostic methods. Area under the curve (AUC) of BI-RADS, SUV_max, and BI-RADS/SUV_max combined were obtained using receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Of 206 cases, 92 were benign and 114 were malignant. The difference between the SUV_max and the BI-RADS grades was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The critical value of the optimal SUV_max was 2.325, and the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 84.5%, 91.2%, 76.1%, 82.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. For diagnosis using BI-RADS, these values were 85.9%, 98.2%, 70.7%, 80.6%, and 97.0%, respectively. ROC analysis of 206 breast lesions for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions yielded AUCs of 0.948, 0.896, and 0.977 for BI-RADS, SUV_max, and BI-RADS/SUV_max combined, respectively. The critical value of the optimal SUV_max in grade 3 and 4 lesions (as determined using BI-RADS) was 2.705, and the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 82.6%, 77.8%, 85.7%, 77.8%, and 85.7%, respectively. For diagnosis using BI-RADS in cases with grade 3 and 4 lesions, these values were 68.5%, 94.4%, 51.8%, 55.7%, and 93.5%, respectively. In ROC analysis for distinguishing benign from malignant for BI-RADS grade 3-4 lesions, the AUC of BI-RADS, SUV_max, and BI-RADS/SUV_max combined were 0.731, 0.859, and 0.882, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound-dependent BI-RADS grading are effective for diagnosing breast lesions. However, in cases of BI-RADS grades 3 and 4, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has better specificity and may be useful for further differential diagnosis.

Management of Incidental Breast Lesions Detected at Nuclear Medicine Examinations

Nuclear medicine studies are often performed in patients with breast cancer; however, incidental radiotracer uptake in the breasts can be observed in patients with nonbreast malignancies. Benign and malignant lesions can be identified on planar, SPECT, and PET scans. This review will outline the molecular and radiographic imaging appearance of benign and malignant breast lesions on sestamibi scans, bone scans, radioiodine studies, as well as PET studies using fluorine 18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose, gallium 68 (⁶⁸Ga) tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid octreotate (or DOTATATE), ⁶⁸Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen, and ¹⁸F-fluciclovine radiotracers. Recognizing these lesions at molecular and anatomic imaging is important to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Keywords: Breast, Mammography, Molecular Imaging, PET/CT, Radionuclide Studies, SPECT/CT © RSNA, 2020.

A preliminary study to propose a diagnostic algorithm for PET/CT-detected incidental breast lesions: application of BI-RADS lexicon for US in combination with SUVmax

OBJECTIVES

To develop a diagnostic algorithm for positron emission tomography (PET)-detected incidental breast lesions using both breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) criteria.

METHODS

Fifty-six PET-detected incidental breast lesions from 51 patients, which were subsequently investigated by breast ultrasound within 1 month of the PET study, constituted the study cohort and they were finally verified by tissue diagnosis or a 2-year follow-up. Based on the maximum specificity with sensitivity > 60.0% and maximum sensitivity with specificity > 60.0%, two SUVmax cutoff values were calculated at 2 and 3.7. BI-RADS ≥ 4 was considered as highly suspicious for malignancy. The diagnostic accuracies were estimated for SUVmax levels above or below the cutoff points combined with the BI-RADS suspicion level.

RESULTS

Overall, 46 benign and 10 malignant lesions were studied. The diagnostic characteristics of SUVmax ≥ 2, SUVmax ≥ 3.7, and BI-RADS ≥ 4 were 80.0%, 60.0%, and 80.0% for sensitivity, 73.9%, 95.7%, and 92.7% for specificity, and 75.0%, 89.3%, and 90.2% for accuracy, respectively. When the SUVmax threshold was set at 2, combined with BI-RADS suspicion level, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100.0%, 69.6%, and 75.0%, respectively. The results for SUVmax threshold set at 3.7 combined with BI-RADS were 90.0%, 91.3%, and 91.1% for the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively. A diagnostic algorithm was accordingly generated.

CONCLUSION

The need for biopsy should be justified in low BI-RADS lesions presenting with high SUVmax at 3.7 or higher. The biopsy of patients with high B-IRADS and low SUVmax could be preserved.

KEY POINTS

• A diagnostic algorithm was developed for PET-detected incidental breast lesions using both BI-RADS and SUVmax criteria. • Diagnostic performance was calculated separately and conjunctively for SUVmax ≥ 2, SUVmax ≥ 3.7, and BI-RADS ≥ 4. • The need for biopsy can be justified in BI-RADS < 4 lesions with SUVmax ≥ 3.7. Lesions with BI-RADS < 4 and indeterminate SUVmax (2 < SUVmax < 3.7) benefit from a short-interval follow-up. BI-RADS < 4 lesions with SUVmax < 2 may confidently be scheduled for routine screening.

Incidence and outcomes of incidental breast lesions detected on cross-sectional imaging examinations

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and outcomes of incidental breast lesions detected on nonbreast specific cross-sectional imaging examinations. A retrospective review of the medical records was performed to identify all patients without a known history of breast cancer, who had an incidentally discovered breast lesion detected on a nonbreast imaging examination performed at our institution between September 2008 and August 2012 for this IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant study. Outcomes of the incidental lesions were determined by follow-up with dedicated breast imaging (mammography, breast ultrasound, and/or breast MRI) or results of biopsy, if performed. Imaging modality of detection, imaging features, patient age, patient location at the time of the nonbreast imaging examination, type of follow-up, and final outcome were recorded. Rates of malignancy were also calculated, and comparison was made across the different cross-sectional imaging modalities. Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests were used to identify factors associated with an increased rate of malignancy. Logistic regression was used to model the risk of malignancy as a function of continuous predictors (such as patient age or lesion size); odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. A total of 292 patients with incidental breast lesions were identified, 242 of whom had incidental lesions were noted on computed tomography (CT) studies, 25 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 25 on positron emission tomography (PET). Although most of the incidental breast lesions were detected on CT examinations, PET studies had the highest rate of detection of incidental breast lesions per number of studies performed (rate of incidental breast lesion detection on PET studies was 0.29%, compared to 0.10% for CT and 0.01% for MRI). Of the 121 of 292 (41%) patients who received dedicated breast imaging work-up at our institution, 40 of 121 (33%) underwent biopsy and 25 of 121 (21%) had malignancy. There was a significantly increased rate of malignancy in older patients (odds ratio: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.093; P = .006). Additionally, patients with PET-detected incidental breast lesions had a significantly higher rate of malignancy (55%), compared to patients with CT-detected (35%) and MRI-detected (8%) incidental breast lesions (P = .038). The rate of malignancy upon follow-up of incidental breast lesions detected on nonbreast imaging examinations in this retrospective study was 21%, supporting the importance of emphasizing further work-up of all incidentally detected breast lesions with dedicated breast imaging. Additionally, we found that PET examinations had the highest rate of detection of incidental breast lesions and the highest rate of malignancy, which suggests that PET examinations may be more specific for predicting the likelihood of malignancy of incidental breast lesions, compared to CT and MRI.

Incidentalomas during imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism--incidence and clinical outcomes

Background

Imaging for pre-operative localisation of parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism is now routine. This has led to the detection of incidental lesions (incidentalomas) in other organs, the nature of which is not well characterised.

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, characteristics and outcomes in patients who had incidental findings on parathyroid imaging.

Methods

Records of patients who underwent imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism over 2 years were reviewed to identify incidental lesions detected on parathyroid imaging. Patients with persistent or renal hyperparathyroidism were excluded. Details on the management of detected incidentalomas were obtained from patient records.

Results

Incidentalomas were identified in 17 of 170 patients (10 %) undergoing parathyroid imaging. Incidentalomas included thyroid (n = 11), breast (n = 3), lateral compartment of the neck (n = 1), lung (n = 1) and clavicle (n = 1). However, no disease of clinical significance needing treatment was detected on further investigation.

Conclusions

Although a significant proportion of patients undergoing parathyroid imaging had incidental lesions detected, these seem to be of little clinical significance. The morbidity and cost of further interventions on these incidentalomas need to be weighed against the benefits of routine imaging in improving outcomes of first-time surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Incidental Breast Lesions Identified by (18)F-FDG PET/CT: Which Clinical Variables Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions?

Purpose

The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy and to determine which clinical variables differentiate between benign and malignant focal breast lesions found incidentally on ¹⁸F-flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG PET/CT).

Methods

From March 2005 to October 2011, 21,224 women with no history of breast cancer underwent FDG PET/CT at three university-affiliated hospitals. We retrospectively identified 214 patients with incidental focal hypermetabolic breast lesions and grouped them into benign and malignant lesion groups. Of the 214 patients, 82 patients with 91 lesions were included in this study. All lesions were confirmed histologically or were assessed by follow-up imaging for greater than 2 years. The patient age, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), lesion size on ultrasonography (US), and Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category on US in conjunction with mammography were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with malignancy.

Results

The risk of malignancy was 29.7% (27/91) in breast incidentalomas detected by FDG PET/CT. The univariate analysis showed that the patient age, SUV_max, tumor size, and BI-RADS category differed significantly between the malignant and benign groups. The multivariate analysis showed that the BI-RADS category was the only significant factor differentiating benign from malignant lesions (p=0.002).

Conclusion

BIRADS category based on US in conjunction with mammography was the only useful tool to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions in breast incidentalomas on FDG PET/CT.

Multicentric study on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT breast incidental uptake in patients studied for non-breast malignant purposes

AIM

Our study has aimed to establish the prevalence and pathological nature of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) breast incidental uptake (BIU) in patients studied for non-malignant breast tumours and then to compare our data obtained in three Italian nuclear medicine centres with those available in literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 42,927 (18)F-FDG-PET/CT scans performed on patients studied in three Italian Nuclear Medicine Centres. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for oncologic purposes not related to breast disease.

RESULTS

Among 42,927 scans, a BIU was identified in 79 (0.18%) patients, 75 (95%) female and 4 (5%) male with an average age of 62 ± 17 years. Twenty-five out of 35 (71.5%) BIUs were malignant and 10/35 (28.5%) benign. Among the 25/35 incidentalomas that were malignant, 12/25 (48%) were infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 5/25 (20%) ductal carcinoma (infiltrating and in situ), 4/25 (16%) lobular carcinoma, 2/25 (8%) ductal carcinoma in situ and 2/25 (8%) were metastases from the primary tumour under investigation. Of the 10 BIUs that were benign in the histological examination, after further investigations it was found that 9/10 (90%) were fibroadenomas and 1/10 (10%) was a benign lesion not better specified. The lesion to liver or to blood-pool SUVmax ratio in malignant lesions is significantly higher than in benign ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multicenter study demonstrates that, although they are uncommon, BIUs show a high percentage of malignancy and therefore requires further research.

Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer

Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may not be used in the diagnosis of breast cancer, the use of PET/computed tomography is imperative in all aspects of breast cancer staging, treatment, and follow-up. PET will continue to be relevant in personalized medicine because accurate tumor status will be even more critical during and after the transition from a generic metabolic agent to receptor imaging. Positron emission mammography is an imaging proposition that may have benefits in lower doses, but its use is limited without new radiopharmaceuticals.

Role of combined BI-RADS assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast on 18F-FDG PET-CT

BACKGROUND

PET-CT is widely used for evaluation and follow-up of malignancy. Incidental hypermetabolic lesions are often found on PET-CT, some of which are confirmed to be malignant.

PURPOSE

To estimate the role of combined Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions on 18F-FDG PET-CT and to determine an appropriate next step.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included incidental hypermetabolic lesions found in the breasts of 7594 women who underwent PET-CT at three university-affiliated hospitals between January 2006 and December 2011. We reviewed the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of incidental lesions, combined BI-RADS assessment of mammography and sonography, and final results. We analyzed the negative predictive values of the probably benign (categories 1-3) group and the sensitivity of suspicious (categories 4 and 5) groups according to combined BI-RADS assessment.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (0.6%) had 49 incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast. Histologic diagnosis in 17 patients confirmed nine breast cancers (27.3%). Sixteen patients underwent imaging follow-up for at least 2 years; no breast cancer was detected. Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded. For the suspicious (n = 14) and probably benign (n = 19) groups according to combined BI-RADS assessment, both the sensitivity and negative predictive values were 100%. Using an optimal diagnostic cut-off value of 2.15, the malignancy rate was not significantly different (16.7% vs. 45.5%, respectively, in the group with SUVmax < 2.15 and the group with SUVmax ≥ 2.15; P > 0.05). The SUVmax of the confirmed malignant and assumed benign groups were not significantly different (3.1% vs. 2.2%, respectively; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both mammography and sonography should be considered the next step to evaluate incidental hypermetabolic lesions on 18F-FDG PET-CT because combined BI-RADS assessment provides an excellent negative predictive value for excluding malignancy.

Comparison between incidental malignant and benign breast lesions detected by computed tomography: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

With increasing use of CT for a variety of diagnostic pathways, breast incidentalomas will be identified more frequently. Therefore, it is important for radiologists to know typical CT appearances of malignant and benign breast lesions. The aim of this study was to compare radiological features of benign and malignant incidental breast findings on CT reported in the literature.

METHODS

A search for appropriate studies published between 1988 and 2012 yielded five results with a total of 214 patients/257 lesions. Morphological features of the described breast masses, such as shape, margins, enhancement, axillary lymphadenopathy and calcifications, were analysed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of incidental breast carcinoma varied from 9.2% to 60.9% of the lesions. The frequency of benign lesions was 30.4-71.8%. The remaining incidental findings were intramammary metastases and primary or secondary breast lymphomas. Malignant lesions were larger in size, were round in shape and demonstrated a higher density compared with benign lesions. There was no significant difference in the margin characteristics of the masses between the groups. The morphological features previously postulated as typical for malignancy turned out to be non-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

Benign and malign breast incidentalomas are not safely distinguished from each other on standard chest CT. Therefore, all breast incidentalomas should be evaluated by further radiological/histological investigations.

Physiology and pathophysiology of incidental findings detected on FDG-PET scintigraphy

A routine feature of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is whole-body acquisition that results in many unexpected findings identified outside of the primary region of abnormality. Furthermore, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is a marker of glycolysis and does not specifically accumulate in malignancy. Understanding the physiology and pathophysiology of normal FDG distribution and common incidental findings is therefore essential to the physician interpreting whole-body FDG-PET/CT studies. Whereas many incidental findings are benign and of limited clinical significance, others represent uncommon manifestations of the primary malignancy, second malignancies, or various clinically significant pathologic processes. Patients with a single malignancy are at greater risk of developing synchronous or metachronous second malignancies, possibly related to exposure to shared carcinogenic agents or presence of prooncogenic mutations. The decision of how to pursue an intervention on the basis of an incidental finding is generally left to clinical judgment.