1
|
Wang Y, Guo T, Xing X, Liu X, Gan X, Li Y, Liu Y, Shan F, Wu Z, Ji J, Li Z. The accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells participates in abdominal infection-induced tumor progression through the PD-L1/PD-1 axis. Mol Oncol 2025; 19:1532-1545. [PMID: 39835710 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with gastrectomy being the primary treatment option. Sepsis, a systemic inflammatory response to infection, may influence tumor growth by creating an immunosuppressive environment conducive to cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Here, the effect of abdominal infection on tumor growth and metastasis was investigated through the implementation of a peritoneal metastasis model and a subcutaneous tumor model. In a murine model induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) to simulate the effects of sepsis, we observed significant immune dysregulation, including T-cell exhaustion and the release of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). This immune alteration was associated with increased programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) expression on T cells and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on MDSCs within the tumor microenvironment, fostering an immune-suppressive environment. Polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs) expressing elevated PD-L1 after sepsis demonstrated more substantial suppressive effects on T-cell proliferation than controls. Treatment with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies successfully restored T-cell function, reduced mortality, and decreased metastasis in CLP mice. These findings emphasize the impact of sepsis on tumor progression and suggest targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis as a potential therapeutic strategy for managing immune dysfunction in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiding Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Ting Guo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofang Xing
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xijuan Liu
- Department of Central Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xuejun Gan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yingai Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Shan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhouqiao Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Translational Research, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsui R, Nunobe S, Ri M, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Hayami M, Ohashi M, Sano T. Post-radical gastrectomy long-term survival and etiologies of mortalities in older adult patients greater than 80 years of age with gastric cancer. World J Surg 2025; 49:230-240. [PMID: 39572016 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 10/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients aged >80-years-old with gastric cancer are commonly excluded from clinical trials, and no consensus exists regarding surgical indications and outcomes in older patients. In this study, we analyzed the post-gastrectomy long-term survival and etiologies of mortality in older patients with gastric cancer. METHODS Patients aged >80-years-old with pathological stages I-III primary gastric cancer who undergone radical gastrectomies, between May 2006 and March 2017, were included in the study. Eligible patients were categorized into 3 age cohorts: <85-, 85-90-, and >90-years-old. The primary outcome was the overall survival. The etiologies of mortalities were compared. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis, using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 59 months. Of the 353 patients, 269 (76.2%), 71 (20.1%), and 13 (3.7%) were categorized into the <85-, 85-90-, >90-years-old age cohorts, respectively. Older patients had a poorer overall survival (p = 0.003) and statistically significant difference in the other-cause survival (p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that age was not an independent prognostic factor for overall or cancer-specific survival. However, an age >90-years-old was an independent prognostic factor for the other-cause survival. CONCLUSIONS In patients aged >80-years-old with gastric cancer who had undergone gastrectomies, mortalities from other diseases increased with age; while mortalities from gastric cancer did not. An age of ≥90-years-old was an independent prognostic factor for mortalities from other diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Souya Nunobe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motonari Ri
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rie Makuuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Irino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Hayami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manabu Ohashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Junttila A, Helminen O, Helmiö M, Huhta H, Jalkanen A, Kallio R, Koivukangas V, Kokkola A, Laine S, Lietzen E, Louhimo J, Meriläinen S, Pohjanen VM, Rantanen T, Ristimäki A, Räsänen JV, Saarnio J, Sihvo E, Toikkanen V, Tyrväinen T, Valtola A, Kauppila JH. Impact of splenectomy on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:2090-2096. [PMID: 39393772 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No national studies comparing long-term survival after total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation exist. This study aimed to examine the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation in a population-based nationwide setting. METHODS This study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy or spleen preservation for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland from 2005 to 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. A total of 2196 patients with gastric cancer diagnosis and total or partial gastrectomy were identified in the registries. Of these patients, 2118 were applicable for this study. Cox proportional hazard models provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of 5-year OS. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of operation, comorbidities, tumor location, pathologic stage, and neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS The observed 5-year OS rates were 38.7% in patients with no or minor spleen injury, 39.7% in patients with splenectomy due to injury, and 30.8% in patients with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons (P = .032). Patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons had higher 5-year mortality (the adjusted model HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56) than patients who underwent spleen preservation. CONCLUSION The OS was worst in patients who underwent gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons, highlighting the poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Splenectomy due to injury does not compromise the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Junttila
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
| | - Olli Helminen
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Mika Helmiö
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Huhta
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Aapo Jalkanen
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vesa Koivukangas
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Arto Kokkola
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Simo Laine
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Elina Lietzen
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Louhimo
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Sanna Meriläinen
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Vesa-Matti Pohjanen
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tuomo Rantanen
- Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District Laboratory, Helsinki and Uusimaa Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jari V Räsänen
- Department of General Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juha Saarnio
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eero Sihvo
- Department of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Vesa Toikkanen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tuula Tyrväinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Valtola
- Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Joonas H Kauppila
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Junttila A, Helminen O, Helmiö M, Huhta H, Jalkanen A, Kallio R, Koivukangas V, Kokkola A, Laine S, Lietzen E, Louhimo J, Meriläinen S, Pohjanen VM, Rantanen T, Ristimäki A, Räsänen JV, Saarnio J, Sihvo E, Toikkanen V, Tyrväinen T, Valtola A, Kauppila JH. Comparison of Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Antecolic Versus Retrocolic Reconstruction: A Population-Based Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5263-5272. [PMID: 38750189 PMCID: PMC11236863 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15415-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine the rates of 90-day anastomotic complications and other postoperative complications after total or partial gastrectomy with antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction in a population-based setting. METHODS This population-based nationwide retrospective cohort study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland in 2005-2016, with follow-up until 31 December 2019. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 90-day mortality. Results were adjusted for age, sex, year of the surgery, comorbidities, tumor locations, pathological stage, and neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS A total of 2063 patients having gastrectomy with antecolic (n = 814) or retrocolic (n = 1249) reconstruction were identified from the registries. The anastomotic complication rate was 3.8% with antecolic reconstruction and 5.0% with retrocolic reconstruction. Antecolic reconstruction was not associated with a higher risk of anastomotic complications compared with retrocolic reconstruction in the adjusted analysis (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.09) of the whole cohort or in the predefined subgroups. The reoperation rate was 8.2% with antecolic reconstruction and 7.7% with retrocolic reconstruction, without statistical significance. In subgroup analysis of total gastrectomy patients, the risk of major complications was lower with antecolic reconstruction compared with retrocolic reconstruction (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86). CONCLUSIONS The rate of anastomotic complications did not differ after antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after total or partial gastrectomy. In total gastrectomies, the risk of major complications was lower after antecolic compared with retrocolic reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Junttila
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
| | - Olli Helminen
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Mika Helmiö
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Huhta
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Aapo Jalkanen
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Vesa Koivukangas
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Arto Kokkola
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Simo Laine
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Elina Lietzen
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Louhimo
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sanna Meriläinen
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Vesa-Matti Pohjanen
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tuomo Rantanen
- Department of Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jari V Räsänen
- Department of General Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juha Saarnio
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eero Sihvo
- Department of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Vesa Toikkanen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tuula Tyrväinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Valtola
- Department of Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Joonas H Kauppila
- Surgery Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ren LF, Xu YH, Long JG. Prognostic Value of Postoperative Complication for Gastric Cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:339-353. [PMID: 38573161 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The incidence of complications in gastric cancer (GC) patients after surgery was increasing, and it was not clear whether postoperative complications would have an impact on prognosis. The current study attempted to investigate the role of postoperative complication for prognosis on GC patients undergoing radical resection. Materials and Methods: Eligible studies were searched in three databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, in accordance with the searching strategy on September 4th, 2022. The survival values were most concerned; then, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled up. All prognostic values, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS), were allowed. Subgroup analysis based on complication types was used for further in-depth research. Results: A total of 29 studies involving 33,858 patients were included in this study. Intra-abdominal abscess (19.4%) was the most common complications in the included studies, followed by anastomotic leakage (17.0%) and pneumonia (16.4%). There were 23, 4, 6, and 10 studies that reported OS, DFS, DSS, and RFS, respectively. After analysis, postoperative complication was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.52, I2 = 1.14%, 95% CI = 1.42-1.61, P = .00), DFS (HR = 1.71, I2 = 0.00%,95% CI = 1.44-1.98, P < .05), DSS (HR = 1.60, I2 = 54.58%, 95% CI = 1.26-1.93, P < .1), and RFS (HR = 1.26, I2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 1.11-1.41, P < .05). Subgroup analysis found that noninfectious complication was not significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.39, I2 = 0.00%, 95% CI = 0.96-1.82, P > .05). Conclusion: Surgeons needed to pay more attention to GC patients who developed postoperative complications, especially infectious complications, and take proactive management to improve the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Fei Ren
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong-Hong Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jie-Gen Long
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|