Diets for diagnosis and management of food allergy: The role of the dietitian in eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and children

Factors associated with treatment response in eosinophilic esophagitis patients: Experience from a pediatric tertiary care center

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disease characterized by eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus and associated esophageal dysfunction with increasing worldwide prevalence. Clinical presentation is nonspecific and varies with age, with limited studies in the pediatric population. Objective: Our study aimed to compile clinical phenotypes, esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, and treatment response of EoE in a tertiary pediatric center, and to examine factors associated with the response of treatment. Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of 824 patients diagnosed with EoE at Children's Hospital of Michigan from 2011 to 2021. Data collected included a demographic profile, symptoms, esophagogastroduodenoscopic and histopathologic findings, treatment modalities, response, and compliance. We then performed a multivariable logistic regression to assess the associating factors that influenced the treatment response rate. Results: A high proportion of males and coexisting allergic conditions were observed in the patients with EoE, with the most common presentation of vomiting in children and of abdominal pain in adolescents. Among 656 of the 824 patients who had follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy, treatment response rates varied among modalities, with proton-pump inhibitor treatment exhibiting the highest response rate, at 60.8%, followed by diet modification (50%) and topical steroid treatment (43.5%). Significant predictors of normal endoscopic findings at follow-up included female gender, normal endoscopic appearance, good compliance to treatment, and absence of topical steroids in the treatment regimen. There were no significant differences in outcomes observed for targeted elimination led by a skin-prick test or specific immunoglobulin E test. Medication compliance did not significantly differ among the treatment options. Conclusion: Managing EoE in pediatric patients poses significant challenges, which emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary care to achieve treatment response effectively. The findings underscore the complexity of managing EoE and the need for individualized treatment approaches. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and optimize management strategies for pediatric patients with EoE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in children: A multicenter study evaluating current practices in Mexico

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated condition characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus, leading to symptoms such as food impaction and growth delays. Despite its increasing recognition, there is significant variability in diagnostic and treatment practices, particularly in pediatric populations.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the current diagnostic and treatment practices for EoE in children across multiple centers in Mexico, identify common clinical presentations, and assess the role of IgG4 in EoE.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 pediatric patients diagnosed with EoE. Data on clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, histologic analysis, allergy assessments, and treatment approaches were collected. The presence of IgG4-positive plasma cells was also evaluated.

Results

The median age was 10.6 years, with a diagnostic delay of 15.5 months. Acute food impaction was the most common symptom, and 82% had a personal history of atopy. Endoscopic abnormalities were observed in 71% of patients. Histologic analysis confirmed EoE in 83.8% of biopsy samples, with eosinophil counts averaging 17 to 24 per high-power field. IgG4-positive plasma cells were present in 76.5% of patients. Treatment varied, with many receiving proton pump inhibitors and topical corticosteroids, but patients treated with dupilumab showed significant improvement.

Conclusions

The study highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing EoE in children, emphasizing the need for standardized practices and comprehensive evaluations. The presence of IgG4-positive plasma cells suggests a potential role in EoE pathophysiology. Further research is needed to establish effective treatment guidelines and confirm the potential of dupilumab as a therapeutic option.

The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Position on the Role of the Registered Dietitian Nutritionist in the Care of the Pediatric Patient With Chronic Gastrointestinal Diseases

The optimization of nutrition is essential for the growth and development of all children, including those with gastrointestinal (GI) conditions that can variably affect nutrient intake, absorption, or metabolism. Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs) are essential partners in delivering high quality care for pediatric GI disorders, but limited evidence is available to support the role of the RDN in the care of these patients. This position paper outlines the evidence supporting the role of the RDN in the management of chronic pediatric GI issues in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Gaps in the literature, opportunities for future research, and barriers to RDN access are discussed.

Cow's Milk Allergy or Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Can We Solve the Dilemma in Infants?

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) may manifest with similar symptoms in infants making the diagnosis challenging. While immediate reaction to cow's milk protein indicate CMA, regurgitation, vomiting, crying, fussiness, poor appetite, sleep disturbances have been reported in both CMA and GERD and in other conditions such as functional gastrointestinal disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, anatomic abnormalities, metabolic and neurological diseases. Gastrointestinal manifestations of CMA are often non-IgE mediated and clinical response to cow's milk free diet is not a proof of immune system involvement. Neither for non-IgE CMA nor for GERD there is a specific symptom or diagnostic test. Oral food challenge, esophageal pH impedance and endoscopy are recommended investigations for a correct clinical classification but they are not always feasible in all infants. As a consequence of the diagnostic difficulty, both over- and under- diagnosis of CMA or GERD may occur. Quite frequently acid inhibitors are empirically started. The aim of this review is to critically update the current knowledge of both conditions during infancy. A practical stepwise approach is proposed to help health care providers to manage infants presenting with persistent regurgitation, vomiting, crying or distress and to solve the clinical dilemma between GERD or CMA.

Strategy for Food Reintroduction Following Empiric Elimination and Elemental Dietary Therapy in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review presents the available data regarding efficacy of nutritional therapy, highlighting clinical decision points and a strategy for reintroduction of foods following an elemental diet for treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elemental and empiric elimination diets are highly effective treatments for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Standardization in the reintroduction phase, after utilizing the diet for disease remission, is lacking. Clinicians are confronted with multiple challenges regarding the best practice for food reintroduction and identification of potential dietary triggers including order of foods being challenged and duration between endoscopic procedures. Individualization is required for preference and adherence to optimize quality of life and treatment success for this burdensome and life altering immune driven gastrointestinal disorder. Age specific concerns for children, teenagers, and adults should be assessed using a patient centric approach.

The use of amino acid-based nutritional feeds is effective in the dietary management of pediatric eosinophilic oesophagitis

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated, chronic disease characterized by eosinophilic inflammation and esophageal dysfunction. Specific food allergens including cow's milk protein, are partially causative to disease progression, and dietary management forms three main options; the elemental diet (ED), the empirical elimination diet (EED), and the targeted elimination diet (TED). The dietary choice should be individualized, however, the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition guidelines recommend an ED for pediatric EoE with multiple food allergies, failure to thrive, unresponsive disease or unable to follow a highly restricted diet. The aim of this narrative review was to explore the effectiveness of the ED (using amino acid formula [AAF]), in the management of pediatric EoE.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed to identify eligible studies that described outcomes including eosinophil count, clinical symptoms, growth, and medications.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 eligible studies were found, with n = 462 patients assigned to receive AAF from a total of n = 748 (average age 6.7 years), for a duration of 4 to 8 weeks. The use of AAF reduced eosinophil levels and demonstrated remission (defined as ≤10 eosinophils per high power field) in 75%-100% of children with improvements, if not resolution, in clinical symptoms. AAF was more clinically effective than the use of the EED or TED, where remission rates were 75%-81% and 40%-69%, respectively. Few studies collected growth outcomes, however where documented these were positive for those on AAF. The long-term impacts of each diet were not thoroughly explored.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of AAF is a clinically effective management option for pediatric EoE, and further research is required to guide long-term management.

Individuals affected by eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders have complex unmet needs and frequently experience unique barriers to care

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are a rare but emerging healthcare problem. Patient advocacy groups (PAGs) have an important role in representing the EGID community, and serve as valuable research partners. By leveraging the partnership between medical researchers and PAGs, we examined the unmet needs and barriers to care perceived by individuals affected by EGIDs. Next, we examined if these varied between adult EGID patients and adult caregivers of children with EGID.

METHODS

Adult EGID patients and adult caregivers of children (<18 years) with EGIDs participated in this study. PAGs conducted focus groups comprised of individuals affected by EGIDs to identify domains and questions meaningful to the EGID community and this information was used to develop an online REDCap survey. The survey consisted of 58 questions across medical, healthcare, social, and emotional impact domains. It was distributed via the PAGs' web-based platforms. Demographic data, and responses to questions on a six-point Likert scale were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 361 responses analyzed, 90 (25%) were from adult EGID patients and 271 (75%) were from adult caregivers. Of the applicable responses, in the medical domain only 19% of participants indicated that repeated endoscopies to monitor response to treatment was convenient. In the healthcare domain, 67% indicated that lack of insurance coverage for elemental formula was a barrier. In the social domain, only 5% of respondents reported adequate awareness of EGIDs in schools. In the emotional domain, 64% had experienced significant stress due to EGID related out-of-pocket costs. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that some of these responses varied between adult EGID patients and adult caregivers of children with EGID. The respondents indicated highest priority for improvement in the medical domain compared to other domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals affected by EGIDs have a constellation of complex unmet needs and perceived barriers across medical, healthcare, social and emotional domains. Addressing unmet needs in the medical domain is relatively more important for the EGID community. Understanding unmet needs and barriers will likely help design improved patient-centered EGID care paradigms.

Creating a multi-center rare disease consortium - the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR)

 Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) affect various segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Since these disorders are rare, collaboration is essential to enroll subjects in clinical studies and study the broader population. The Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), a program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), funded the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR) in 2014 to advance the field of EGIDs. CEGIR facilitates collaboration among various centers, subspecialties, patients, professional organizations and patient-advocacy groups and includes 14 clinical sites. It has successfully initiated two large multi-center clinical studies looking to refine EGID diagnoses and management. Several pilot studies are underway that focus on various aspects of EGIDs including novel therapeutic interventions, diagnostic and monitoring methods, and the role of the microbiome in pathogenesis. CEGIR currently nurtures five physician-scholars through a career training development program and has published more than 40 manuscripts since its inception. This review focuses on CEGIR's operating model and progress and how it facilitates a framework for exchange of ideas and stimulates research and innovation. This consortium provides a model for progress on other potential clinical areas.

Management of refractory eosinophilic oesophagitis

The goal of this Review is to discuss the clinical approach to patients who do not respond to treatment for eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Refractory EoE is challenging to manage as there are limited data to guide decision-making. In this Review, refractory EoE is defined as persistent eosinophilia in the setting of incomplete resolution of the primary presenting symptoms and incomplete resolution of endoscopic findings following a PPI trial, and after treatment with either topical steroids or dietary elimination. However, this definition is controversial. This Review will examine these controversies, explore how frequently non-response is observed, and highlight potential explanations and predictors of non-response. Non-response is common and affects a large proportion of patients with EoE. It is important to systematically assess multiple possible causes of non-response, as well as consider treatment complications and an incorrect diagnosis of EoE. If non-response is confirmed, second-line treatments are required. Although the overall response rate for second-line therapy is disappointing, with only half of patients eventually responding, there are several promising agents that are currently under investigation, and the future is bright for new treatment modalities for refractory EoE.

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for eosinophilic esophagitis using the AGREE II instrument

BACKGROUND

High-quality evidence-based clinical practice guidelines can guide diagnosis and treatment to optimize outcomes. We aimed to systematically review the quality of international guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched for appropriate guidelines up to 2016. Two gastroenterologists and two methodologists independently evaluated the documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.

RESULTS

Amongst the 25 records initially retrieved, four guidelines developed by recognized scientific organizations met inclusion criteria. AGREE II results varied widely across domains, but none achieved an overall assessment score of over 60%. Scope and purpose (61.82 ± 19.24%), clarity of presentation (57.13 ± 40.56%) and editorial independence (93.75 ± 1.69%) showed the highest mean rating, whereas stakeholder involvement (28.82 ± 11.19%), rigor of development (32.29 ± 12.02%) and applicability (21.62 ± 7.14%) did not reach quality thresholds. Intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement was excellent among appraisers (0.903), between gastroenterologists and methodologists (0.878) and for each individual guideline (0.838 to 0.955).

CONCLUSION

Clinical practice guidelines for EoE vary significantly in quality, are invariably limited and currently, none can be 'strongly recommended'.