Adverse reactions during procedures: Hypersensitivity to contrast agents and dyes

Evaluating the Efficacy of Premedication in Preventing Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonionic Contrast Agents

Iodine-based contrast agents can induce various acute hypersensitivity reactions ranging from mild itching or vomiting shortly after administration to severe hypotension or loss of consciousness. In Japan, steroid premedication is commonly used to prevent acute hypersensitivity reactions. However, little clear evidence supporting its efficacy is available. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of premedication for acute hypersensitivity reactions induced by nonionic iodine contrast agents using propensity score matching. The participants included patients who were administered nonionic iodine contrast agents at Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022. Only first-time patients with no history of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast agents were included. The patients were classified into premedication and non-premedication groups, and the incidence proportions of acute hypersensitivity reactions were compared after matching. Of the 19976 patients, 422 (211 in each group) were matched. In the premedication group, 7 cases (3.32%) of hypersensitivity reactions occurred. In contrast, only 2 cases (0.95%) were observed in the non-premedication group. The odds ratio for the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions in the premedication group was 3.500 (95% confidence interval, 0.727-16.848), with no significant difference. Therefore, premedication did not demonstrate the efficacy in preventing acute hypersensitivity reactions induced by nonionic iodine contrast agents. Based on the results of this study and guidelines, a recommendation for premedication was not reached for patients with a history of allergies, including asthma and atopy, as well as those with a history of drug or food allergies.

Intradermal testing of iodinated contrast media: Should we test up to pure or with diluted compounds only?

BACKGROUND

Intradermal testing (IDT) with iodinated contrast media (ICMs) is an established diagnostic tool in patients with ICM hypersensitivity. Currently, it is unclear which test concentration is the more useful one, up to pure or up to 1:10 diluted ICMs.

METHODS

We searched the literature database PubMed for eligible papers dealing with ICM allergy and their IDT results. We analyzed the data presented by the papers and compared the pooled groups tested with diluted and undiluted ICMs.

RESULTS

We identified 29 eligible original papers, and extracted data of 1137 patients that formed the study population. Although in the cohort tested with diluted ICMs the number of tested ICMs was greater, the percentage of positive tests was significantly less (9.0% vs. 24.7%; P < 0.0001; OR 0.30 [0.26-0.34]). The frequency of positive tested culprit ICMs was also lesser in the group tested with diluted ICMs (31.0% vs. 72.5%; P < 0.0001; OR 0.17 [0.12-0.23]). The number of drug provocation tests (DPTs) was greater in patients with diluted IDTs (374 vs. 89; P < 0.0001; OR 2.54 [1.93-3.36]). We detected an increased sensitivity in patients with undiluted tests (0.774 vs. 0.282) and a nearly identical specificity in both groups (1 vs. 0.983).

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we show that IDT up to pure ICM concentrations is superior to using diluted ICMs only. Possibly, we can reduce the number of DPTs when performing IDTs with pure ICMs. In the undiluted group, there were no hints for skin irritations or unspecific test reactions.

Analysis of Allergy and Hypersensitivity Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines According to the EudraVigilance Database

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a new challenge in modern medicine: the development of vaccines was followed by massive population vaccinations. A few reports on post-vaccination allergic reactions have made patients and medical personnel uneasy as to COVID-19 vaccines' allergic potential. Most of the studies in this area to date have been small, and some that were based on global databases skipped most of the allergic diseases and concentrated only on anaphylaxis. We aimed to analyze the incidence of serious allergic reactions based on the EudraVigilance (EV) database, regardless of the reported symptoms and allergy mechanism.

METHODS

The total number of administrated vaccine doses was extracted on 5 October 2023 from Vaccine Tracker and included all administrations since vaccinations began in the European Economic Area (EEA). Data on serious allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines were extracted from the EudraVigilance database with the same time point. The code names of 147 allergic symptoms or diseases were used.

RESULTS

The frequency of serious allergic reactions per 100,000 administered vaccine doses was 1.53 for Comirnaty, 2.16 for Spikevax, 88.6 for Vaxzevria, 2.11 for Janssen, 7.9 for Novavax, 13.3 for VidPrevtyn Beta, and 3.1 for Valneva. The most prevalent reported reactions were edema (0.46) and anaphylaxis (0.40). Only 6% of these reactions were delayed hypersensitivity-oriented.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall frequency of potential serious allergic reactions to COVID-19 is very rare. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccines seem to be safe for human use. The lowest frequency of allergic reaction was observed for Comirnaty and the highest for Vaxzevria.

Levels of Small Extracellular Vesicles Containing hERG-1 and Hsp47 as Potential Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Diseases

The diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still limited. Therefore, this study demonstrates the presence of human ether-a-go-go-related gene 1 (hERG1) and heat shock protein 47 (Hsp47) on the surface of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) in human peripheral blood and their association with CVD. In this research, 20 individuals with heart failure and 26 participants subjected to cardiac stress tests were enrolled. The associations between hERG1 and/or Hsp47 in sEVs and CVD were established using Western blot, flow cytometry, electron microscopy, ELISA, and nanoparticle tracking analysis. The results show that hERG1 and Hsp47 were present in sEV membranes, extravesicularly exposing the sequences 430AFLLKETEEGPPATE445 for hERG1 and 169ALQSINEWAAQTT- DGKLPEVTKDVERTD196 for Hsp47. In addition, upon exposure to hypoxia, rat primary cardiomyocytes released sEVs into the media, and human cardiomyocytes in culture also released sEVs containing hERG1 (EV-hERG1) and/or Hsp47 (EV-Hsp47). Moreover, the levels of sEVs increased in the blood when cardiac ischemia was induced during the stress test, as well as the concentrations of EV-hERG1 and EV-Hsp47. Additionally, the plasma levels of EV-hERG1 and EV-Hsp47 decreased in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF). Our data provide the first evidence that hERG1 and Hsp47 are present in the membranes of sEVs derived from the human cardiomyocyte cell line, and also in those isolated from human peripheral blood. Total sEVs, EV-hERG1, and EV-Hsp47 may be explored as biomarkers for heart diseases such as heart failure and cardiac ischemia.

Changing patterns in the epidemiology of drug allergy

Drug allergy (DA) remains a complex and unaddressed problem worldwide that often deprives patients of optimal medication choices and places them at risk for life-threatening reactions. Underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis are common and due to the lack of standardized definitions and biomarkers. The true burden of DA is unknown, and recent efforts in data gathering through electronic medical records are starting to provide emerging patterns around the world. Ten percent of the general population engaged in health care claim to have a DA, and the most common label is penicillin allergy. Up to 20% of emergency room visits for anaphylaxis are due to DA and 15%-20% of hospitalized patients report DA. It is estimated that DA will increase based on the availability and use of new and targeted antibiotics, vaccines, chemotherapies, biologicals, and small molecules, which are aimed at improving patient's options and quality of life. Global and regional variations in the prevalence of diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus and mycobacterial diseases, and the drugs used to treat these infections have an impact on DA. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the global impact of DA by presenting emerging data on drug epidemiology in adult and pediatric populations.

Skin Test Reactivity Patterns in Patients Allergic to Iodinated Contrast Media: A Refined View

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional (2D) classifications of iodinated contrast media (ICM) are insufficient to explain the observed skin test (ST) reactivity patterns in patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to ICM.

OBJECTIVE

To refine the current view on allergic DHRs to ICM by analyzing ST reactivity patterns in patients with previous reactions to ICM.

METHODS

Patients with a history of DHR to ICM and positive STs, who presented at the University Hospital of Montpellier between 2004 and 2022, were included in the study. The relative difference between every two ICM products was measured by Manhattan distance and odds ratios were computed for all pairs of products in the immediate reaction (IR) and non-immediate reaction (NIR) ST groups.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were included in the study. Odds ratio analysis identified significant associations between classical cross-reactive ICM, such as iohexol-ioversol, iohexol-iomeprol, iomeprol-ioversol, and iohexol-iodixanol in the IR ST group and iohexol-ioversol, iopromide-iohexol, and iomeprol-ioversol in the NIR ST group. We also identified uncommon associations, such as ioxitalamate-amidotrizoate in the IR ST group and amidotrizoate-iopamidol and amidotrizoate-ioxitalamate in the NIR ST group. The results were reflected by the Manhattan distance, which suggested the existence of clusters containing the same classically associated ICM as well as uncommon associations, which we hypothesize to be related to similarities in the 3D structure of the respective ICM.

CONCLUSIONS

Current chemical (2D) classifications cannot explain all observed ST reactivity patterns. Whether the 3D structure can be integrated into the current classifications to interpret the observed ST reactivity patterns and predict tolerance to alternative ICM requires further research.

Exploring Factors Affecting the Occurrence of Hypersensitivity Reactions Induced by Nonionic Iodine Contrast Media

Hypersensitivity reactions induced by nonionic iodine contrast media sometimes occur and can be life threatening. However, independent factors affecting their occurrence remain to be fully established. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify independent factors affecting the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions induced by nonionic iodine contrast media. Patients who received nonionic iodine contrast media at Keiyu Hospital from April 2014 to December 2019 were included. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for factors affecting hypersensitivity reactions induced by contrast media were calculated by logistic regression analysis. The multiple imputation method was used to impute missing data. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 0.72% (163 cases) of 22,695 cases enrolled in this study. In univariate analysis, 10 variables met the criteria of P < .05 and proportion of missing data <50%. In multivariate analysis, age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), outpatient status (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.20-3.60), contrast medium iodine content (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04), history of drug allergy (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.50-3.88), and asthma (OR, 17.4; 95% CI, 7.53-40.1) were identified as independent factors affecting contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Among these factors, history of drug allergy and asthma appear to be clinically relevant and reliable due to their high OR and plausible biological mechanisms, but the other three factors require further validation.

Drug Self-Aggregation into Nano-Entities Has the Potential to Induce Immune Responses

The free-state solution behaviors of small molecules profoundly affect their respective properties. It is becoming more obvious that compounds can adopt a three-phase equilibrium when placed in an aqueous solution, among soluble-lone molecule form, self-assembled aggregate form (nano-entities), and solid precipitate form. Recently, correlations have emerged between the existence of self-assemblies into drug nano-entities and unintended side effects. This report describes our pilot study involving a selection of drugs and dyes to explore if there may be a correlation between the existence of drug nano-entities and immune responses. We first implement practical strategies for detecting the drug self-assemblies using a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal microscopy. We then used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to monitor the modulation of immune responses on two cellular models, murine macrophage and human neutrophils, upon exposure to the drugs and dyes. The results suggest that exposure to some aggregates correlated with an increase in IL-8 and TNF-α in these model systems. Given this pilot study, further correlations merit pursuing on a larger scale given the importance and potential impact of drug-induced immune-related side effects.

Revisiting the Definition of Anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anaphylaxis is a common phenomenon that has been studied for many decades. Despite this, there is still disagreement among organizations regarding the precise definition for anaphylaxis. This article discusses the difference between the proposed definitions of anaphylaxis. Furthermore, the most up-to-date literature on specific subtypes of anaphylaxis is reviewed, and implications for clinical practice are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature on various subtypes of anaphylaxis has been conducted. This has helped clarify guidelines for conditions such as allergy to radiocontrast media, idiopathic anaphylaxis, and food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Recent literature has also studied available biomarkers for anaphylaxis and the cost-effectiveness of current standard-of-care prescription of epinephrine autoinjectors. Anaphylaxis is an increasingly more frequent phenomenon and remains a hot topic in current research. Much progress has been made in clarifying the definition of anaphylaxis and differentiating between subtypes, but more research is needed to identify a readily available biomarker for anaphylaxis and identify the standard of care for various subtypes of anaphylaxis.

Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated radiocontrast media: Cluster analysis reveals distinct clinical phenotypes

Background

Drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) to iodinated radiocontrast media (iRCM) is reported in 1%–3% of injections. Risk assessment of patients with suspicion of DHR to iRCM relies solely on clinical phenotyping and drug allergy workup. Using a novel unsupervised TwoStep cluster analysis, we aimed to identify prototypic patterns within a large cohort of patients evaluated for a potential iRCM DHR.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using data from the Drug Allergy and Hypersensitivity Database of the Allergy Unit, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. All referred patients during February 2001 to December 2019 with suspicion of iRCM DHR with either confirmed positive or confirmed negative skin tests were included in the analysis.

Results

A total of 1439 patients were evaluated. The chronology of the index reaction was immediate and nonimmediate in 77.1% and 22.4%, respectively. Cluster analysis categorized the total study population in 5 clusters. Cluster 1 compiled all nonimmediate and cluster 2–5 almost all immediate reactors. Cluster 1 and 2 had recent reactions (<1 y) with mostly known iRCMs and the highest iRCM allergy prevalence (16–17%). In the other clusters, more remote reactions, unknown iRCMs and a lower allergy prevalence (3–8%) was observed. Chronology and semiology of the index reaction were the factors most strongly differentiated among clusters. History of anaphylactic shock and chronology of immediate hypersensitivity reactions were shown to be independent predictors of allergy with adjusted OR (aOR) of 4.68 (95%CI: 3.01–7.27, p < 0.001) and 2.51 (95%CI: 1.67–3.78, p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

Unsupervised cluster analysis identified 5 prototypic patterns within patients with a suspected DHR to iRCMs. Well-phenotyped patients cluster together in 2 groups in which the prevalence of allergy is approximately 1 in 6. However, this value decreases for patients with reactions dating back to more than a decade.

Contrast Medium Hypersensitivity: A Large Italian Study with Long-Term Follow-Up

Hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to contrast media (CM) are a major problem. We compared differences of HRs to iodinated contrast media (ICM) versus gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM), collecting data on prevalence, type, latency and severity. Secondly, the predisposition to perform new contrast tests, use of premedication and possible appearance of new reactions were explored in a long-term follow-up of 5 years. Clinical data, comorbidities, skin test (ST) results, re-exposure to CM procedures with any new reactions, premedication and CM used were collected. In a retrospective single-center study, 350 patients with mild to moderate HRs were enrolled. Asthma, food allergy, non-allergic drug hypersensitivity and neurologic disease were significantly more frequent in patients with HRs to GBCM compared to the high evidence of cardiovascular disease and history of cancer in patients with HRs to ICM. A marked delay in performing STs was reported by patients with negative results (66 months, p < 0.01). Iomeprol, iopamidol and gadobenic acid were the culprit CM most involved in HRs in patients with positive STs. During follow-up, 7.1% of responders reported new HRs to CM despite negative STs, premedication and infusion of alternative CM in most cases.

Low risk of contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are at increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). Although Hymenoptera venoms are the predominant triggers, cases of contrast media-induced HR (CMIHR) have also been reported and prophylactic premedication is often performed. However, data from larger series are limited and differences between indolent and advanced SM have not yet been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and severity of CMIHR in all subtypes of SM.

METHODS

We analyzed 162 adult patients with SM (indolent systemic mastocytosis [ISM], n = 65; advanced systemic mastocytosis [advSM], n = 97). First, the cumulative incidence of CMIHR was retrospectively assessed in the patient's history. Second, at our institution, patients underwent 332 contrast media (CM)-enhanced imaging including 80 computed tomography (CT) scans with iodine-based contrast agent and 252 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a gadolinium-based contrast agent, and tolerance was assessed.

RESULTS

Previous CMIHRs to CT (vomiting, n = 1, erythema, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1), and MRI (dyspnea, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1) had been reported by 4 out of 162 (2.5%) patients (ISM, n = 3; advSM, n = 1). In contrast, during or after 332 CM-enhanced CT or MRI examinations at our institution, no CMIHRs were reported. Premedication was solely given to 3 patients before CT scans, including 1 with previous CMIHR, who tolerated the imaging well.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that: (1) there is a substantial discrepancy between the perception and prevalence of HRs to CM in SM; (2) reactions are scarce in ISM and even rarer in advSM; and (3) in SM patients without previous history of CM hypersensitivity, prophylactic premedication before CM-enhanced CT or MRI is dispensable.

Cross-reactivity among iodinated contrast agents: should we be concerned?

Background

Although several papers deal with "cross-reactivity" in patients with iodinated contrast medium (ICM) hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), there is no in-depth knowledge of this phenomenon. To define ICM-groups as potential reaction partners and to identify any potential clinical relevance in patients with ICM-HSRs.

Methods

The literature database PubMed was searched for eligible papers dealing with ICM-allergy and "cross-reactivity". The data presented by the papers was analyzed and individual patient data was extracted for re-evaluation based on a definition for both 'polyvalent reactivity' and 'cross-reactivity' as well as for chemical structure-dependent ICM-groups.

Results

Twenty-five original papers (with n=340 extracted patients) formed the study population. Incidences of polyvalent reactivity were non-significantly higher than incidences of cross-reactivity (both range from 0% to 100%). Crossover evaluation in reaction pairings (culprit ICM A with ICM B versus culprit ICM B with ICM A) showed concordance of only 30%. Data support rather non-cross-reactivity (individual reaction pattern) than cross-reactivity constellations.

Conclusions

The obtained results favour an individual reaction pattern, rather than a reactivity driven by chemical structures and so-called cross-reactivity.

Diagnosing and Managing Patients with Reactions to Radiocontrast Media

Purpose of the review

Iodinated radio contrast media (RCM) belong to the most common elicitors of drug hypersensitivity reactions (HR). Urticaria or anaphylaxis may occur ≤ 1(−6) hour(s) (immediate HR) and exanthems (non-immediate HR) develop > 6 h after application of RCM. Evidence for an immunologic mechanism of RCM HR against the different RCM benzene ring molecules and the benefit of allergological testing in patients with previous hypersensitivity reactions is progressively increasing.

Recent findings

Positive skin tests can confirm allergy in patients with previous reactions to RCM and help to select alternative better tolerated RCMs. Severe hypersensitivity reactions are mainly caused by an allergic mechanism, whereas the majority of non-severe reactions appear to be non-allergic. Skin testing is highly recommended to help identify allergic hypersensitivity reactions and to select alternatives. Using structurally different RCM is more effective than premedication for the prevention of future reactions. Drug provocation tests to RCM have been increasingly used, but are not yet standardized among different centers.

Summary

In patients with previous severe hypersensitivity reactions to RCM, skin testing is recommended. For future RCM-enhanced examinations in patients with previous reactions, structurally different, skin test-negative preparations should be applied. Drug provocation tests do confirm or exclude RCM hypersensitivity or may demonstrate tolerability of alternative RCMs.

Detecting the pulmonary trunk in CT scout views using deep learning

For CT pulmonary angiograms, a scout view obtained in anterior-posterior projection is usually used for planning. For bolus tracking the radiographer manually locates a position in the CT scout view where the pulmonary trunk will be visible in an axial CT pre-scan. We automate the task of localizing the pulmonary trunk in CT scout views by deep learning methods. In 620 eligible CT scout views of 563 patients between March 2003 and February 2020 the region of the pulmonary trunk as well as an optimal slice ("reference standard") for bolus tracking, in which the pulmonary trunk was clearly visible, was annotated and used to train a U-Net predicting the region of the pulmonary trunk in the CT scout view. The networks' performance was subsequently evaluated on 239 CT scout views from 213 patients and was compared with the annotations of three radiographers. The network was able to localize the region of the pulmonary trunk with high accuracy, yielding an accuracy of 97.5% of localizing a slice in the region of the pulmonary trunk on the validation cohort. On average, the selected position had a distance of 5.3 mm from the reference standard. Compared to radiographers, using a non-inferiority test (one-sided, paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test) the network performed as well as each radiographer (P < 0.001 in all cases). Automated localization of the region of the pulmonary trunk in CT scout views is possible with high accuracy and is non-inferior to three radiographers.

Recurrent neck swelling after iodinated contrast media administration

A 74-year-old male with an abdominal aortic aneurism reported 2 episodes of neck swelling 16 hours after an abdominal CT with iodinated contrast media that reappeared in a subsequent CT, although the use of pre-medication. The tests used to exclude the hypersensitivity hypothesis where negative and once a new CT where needed we decided to do it with close monitoring. We performed a facial picture and cervical ultrasound exam before and 24 hours after the exam. The neck swelling and the ultrasound findings 24 hours after the CT made the diagnosis of contrast induced sialoadenitis possible. Contrast induced sialadentis is an uncommon adverse reaction to iodinated contrast media. As it presents with neck swelling it is important to exclude a hypersensitivity reaction because it's further limitations and make a differential diagnosis.

Determining the Diagnostic Utility of Lumbar Punctures in Computed Tomography Negative Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While headache is a common neurologic symptom, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a rare and potentially catastrophic cause of sudden-onset severe headache. The utility of the imaging modalities and interventional procedures are central to the investigation of the causes of headache; however, they are not without their limitations, risks, and complications.

METHODS

A meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines was conducted searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Patients investigated for suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with a negative computed tomography (CT) and positive lumbar puncture (LP) and final diagnosis of SAH were included. The sensitivity of LP in the context of a negative CT and vsubsequent imaging confirming the cause of SAH (computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) was quantified. The pooled data were analyzed using the DerSimonian-Laid random effects model.

RESULTS

Four studies with 2782 patients who presented with headache suspicious for SAH were included with an initial negative CT report and a subsequent LP to rule out SAH. All included studies had an observational prospective cohort design. A combined pooled proportion of 0.383 (0.077, 0.756); 0.086 (0.007, 0.238); and 0.22 (0.04, 0.49) for LP+, DSA+, and DSA/computed tomography angiography+ investigations were estimated with a 95% confidence interval.

CONCLUSIONS

The current clinical workflow of an LP after a negative CT head for a patient presenting with a sudden-onset severe headache is observed to have a high enough proportion to warrant its continued use despite the sensitivity of modern CT scanners of ≥97%.

Multiple drug allergies: Recommendations for perioperative management

Life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions are more likely to occur in patients with a history of allergy, atopy, or asthma. Hence, in a patient who presented with a history of multiple drug allergies (MDA), an allergological assessment should be performed prior to surgical procedure. Drug allergies, being one of the causes of catastrophic events occurring in the perioperative period, are of major concern to anesthesiologists. Neuromuscular blocking agents are regularly used during anesthesia and are one of the most common causes of perioperative anaphylaxis. They are estimated to be responsible for 50%-70% of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. Antibiotics and latex represent the next two groups of drug allergy. Allergic reactions to propofol are rare with an incidence of 1:60,000 exposures. Although intraoperative drug anaphylaxis is rare, it contributes to 4.3% of deaths occurring during general anesthesia. These recommendations discuss pathophysiology of MDA, preoperative evaluation, and anesthesia considerations as well as the prevention and management of allergic reactions in anesthetized patients with a history of MDA.