A review of food allergy panels and their consequences

The ethics of food allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ethical dilemmas are a common occurrence in the provision of care to individuals with food allergies. Thus, an understanding of medical ethics is essential for allergists/immunologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the importance of medical ethics in the clinical practice of food allergy, there has been little published on this topic. Some international allergy societies have published ethical guidelines. Further investigation on medical ethics in food allergy is required.

SUMMARY

This review describes key ethical principles in relation to food allergy testing, oral food challenges, and various management strategies, including avoidance, omalizumab and oral immunotherapy. This review demonstrates the necessity for education and research on medical ethics in food allergy.

A Streamlined Strategy for Basophil Activation Testing in a Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The basophil activation test (BAT) has been limited to research settings owing to technical issues. Novel approaches using dry, ready-to-use reagents and streamlined protocols offer greater flexibility and may open opportunities for easier implementation in clinical research.

OBJECTIVE

Using a streamlined basophil activation test (sBAT) strategy and the settings of the baseline study of the Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Toddlers with Peanut Allergy (EPITOPE) trial of EPicutaneous ImmunoTherapy, we aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing BAT in a multicenter trial and to evaluate its utility in predicting the outcomes of peanut double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).

METHODS

Whole blood samples were collected from subjects aged 1 to 3 years (n = 241) undergoing baseline eligibility DBPCFC in the EPITOPE study across 15 clinical sites in North America. After preparation with sBAT reagents, processed samples were analyzed in a single central laboratory within 5 days of collection and preparation. The eliciting dose (ED) at DBPCFC was determined using, Practical Allergy (PRACTALL) criteria. Using a machine learning approach that incorporated BAT-derived features, clinical characteristics, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E, the ability to predict outcomes of interest (ED ≤ 300 mg or > 300 mg] and use of epinephrine) was assessed using data randomly split into training (n = 182) and validation (n = 59) subsets.

RESULTS

The expression of basophil activation markers CD203c and CD63 correlated with ED and severity outcomes of DBPCFC. Most informative concentrations of peanut extract in the sBAT assay for these associations were 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL. Using machine learning to assess the ability to predict the outcomes of DBPCFC, the best models using only the BAT-derived features provided relatively high sensitivities of 0.86 and 0.85 for predicting ED and epinephrine use, respectively, whereas specificities were lower, ranging from 0.60 to 0.80. Although including specific immunoglobulin E and skin prick test data in addition to those from sBAT did not improve the ability to identify individuals most at risk for severe reactions, it did improve the ability to identify patients with an ED greater than 300 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to facilitating implementation in multicenter trials, sBAT retains the potential of BAT to characterize allergic patients and confirms its potential to contribute to predicting the outcome of oral food challenges.

Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology position statement: panel testing for food allergies

This position statement addresses the critical concerns and recommended practices surrounding the use of panel food testing for diagnosing food allergies. Food allergies are a significant public health concern, and the misdiagnosis of food allergies remains a prevalent concern, made worse by the ongoing use of panel food testing. The practice of screening patients for multiple food allergens, regardless of clinical relevance, is commonly referred to as "panel food testing." Fundamentally, a panel food test is not simply a single test; a panel food test is a series of several distinct tests for multiple foods, each with its own variable predictive value. These tests have not been adequately validated as screening tests and carry a considerable false positive rate. The resulting false diagnoses lead to unnecessary dietary restrictions, increased healthcare costs, and significant psychosocial distress for patients and their families.

Management of Food Allergies and Food-Related Anaphylaxis

Importance

An estimated 7.6% of children and 10.8% of adults have IgE-mediated food-protein allergies in the US. IgE-mediated food allergies may cause anaphylaxis and death. A delayed, IgE-mediated allergic response to the food-carbohydrate galactose-α-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) in mammalian meat affects an estimated 96 000 to 450 000 individuals in the US and is currently a leading cause of food-related anaphylaxis in adults.

Observations

In the US, 9 foods account for more than 90% of IgE-mediated food allergies-crustacean shellfish, dairy, peanut, tree nuts, fin fish, egg, wheat, soy, and sesame. Peanut is the leading food-related cause of fatal and near-fatal anaphylaxis in the US, followed by tree nuts and shellfish. The fatality rate from anaphylaxis due to food in the US is estimated to be 0.04 per million per year. Alpha-gal syndrome, which is associated with tick bites, is a rising cause of IgE-mediated food anaphylaxis. The seroprevalence of sensitization to alpha-gal ranges from 20% to 31% in the southeastern US. Self-injectable epinephrine is the first-line treatment for food-related anaphylaxis. The cornerstone of IgE-food allergy management is avoidance of the culprit food allergen. There are emerging immunotherapies to desensitize to one or more foods, with one current US Food and Drug Administration-approved oral immunotherapy product for treatment of peanut allergy.

Conclusions and Relevance

IgE-mediated food allergies, including delayed IgE-mediated allergic responses to red meat in alpha-gal syndrome, are common in the US, and may cause anaphylaxis and rarely, death. IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to food requires prompt treatment with epinephrine injection. Both food-protein allergy and alpha-gal syndrome management require avoiding allergenic foods, whereas alpha-gal syndrome also requires avoiding tick bites.