Papillary renal cell carcinoma with prominent spindle cell stroma - tumor mimicking mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney: Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of 6 cases

Understanding m6A changes in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and predicting patient outcomes survival

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a prevalent mRNA modification known for its implications in various cancer types, yet its role in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) remains largely unexplored. In this study, we performed m6A-SEAL-seq and RNA-seq analyses on tissues from three chRCC subjects, aiming to uncover m6A alterations in chRCC. Our findings revealed reduced expression levels of four m6A regulators in chRCC tissues and highlighted differences in m6A levels compared to normal tissues. Furthermore, we identified specific genes and cancer-related pathways affected by these differences, including notable candidates like NOTCH1 and FGFR1, implicated in chRCC development. Additionally, we developed a predictive model based on the expression level of m6A associated genes, demonstrating promising prognostic capabilities for patient survival prediction. Overall, our study provides valuable insights into the role of m6A in chRCC and its potential as a prognostic indicator.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma With Microcystic Architecture Is Strongly Associated With Extrarenal Invasion and Metastatic Disease

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is well-recognized as a morphologically and molecularly heterogenous group of kidney tumors with variable clinical behavior. Our goal was to analyze a unique histologic pattern of PRCC we have observed in routine practice to evaluate for potential clinical significance or distinct molecular signature. We identified 42 cases of PRCC showing a morphologically distinct architecture characterized by numerous epithelial-lined cysts containing the papillary tumor (herein called "microcysts"), which are typically separated by fibrous stroma. Of the initial 42 case test set with microcystic features, 23 (55%) were stage pT3a or higher. Most tumors had strong and diffuse cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for CK7 (93%, 37/40) and AMACR (100%, 40/40). Fumarate hydratase staining was retained in all cases tested (39/39). We performed next-generation sequencing on 15 of these cases with available tissue and identified chromosomal alterations commonly reported in historically "type 1" PRCC, notably multiple chromosomal gains, particularly of chromosomes 7 and 17, and MET alterations. However, alterations in pathways associated with more aggressive behavior (including SETD2, CDKN2A, and members of the NRF pathway) were also identified in 6 of 15 cases tested (40%). Given this molecular and immunophenotypic data, we subsequently reviewed an additional group of 60 consecutive pT2b-pT3 PRCCs to allow for comparisons between cases with and without microcysts, to assess for potential associations with other recently described histologic patterns (ie, "unfavorable architecture": micropapillary, solid, and hobnail), and to assess interobserver reproducibility for diagnosing architectural patterns and grade. Of the total combined 102 PRCCs, 67 (66%) had microcystic architecture within the intrarenal component but were commonly admixed with other patterns (39% had micropapillary, 31% solid, and 31% hobnail). Twenty-seven cases (26%) had metastatic disease, and 24 of these 27 (89%) had microcystic architecture in the intrarenal tumor. Within the pT3 subset, 21 of 22 cases with metastases (95%) had extrarenal invasion as either individual microcysts in renal sinus fat or aggregates of microcysts bulging beyond the confines of the capsule. Backward elimination and stepwise regression methods to detect features significantly associated with adverse outcome identified solid architecture (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.3; confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-18.8; P=0.001), hobnail architecture (HR: 5.3; CI: 1.7-16.7; P=0.004), and microcystic architecture at the tumor-stromal interface (HR: 4.2; CI: 1.1-16.7; P=0.036) as strongest. Of architectural patterns and grade, the microcystic pattern had a substantial interobserver agreement (κ score=0.795) that was highest among the 6 observers. In summary, PRCCs with microcystic architecture represents a subset of historically "type 1" PRCC with a predilection for morphologically distinctive extrarenal involvement and metastatic disease. Microcysts co-vary with other "unfavorable" architectural patterns also associated with higher risk for aggressive disease (ie, micropapillary, hobnail, and solid), but microcysts were more common and have superior interobserver reproducibility. These findings suggest that microcystic PRCC should be recognized as a potentially aggressive histologic pattern of growth in PRCC.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma with prominent microvascular hyperplasia: Morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular-genetic analysis of 7 sporadic cases

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is well known for intratumor heterogeneity. An accurate mapping of the tumor is crucial for assessing prognosis, and perhaps this can be linked to potential success/failure of targeted therapies. We assembled a cohort of 7 CCRCCs with prominent vasculature and microvascular hyperplasia (ccRCCPV), resembling those seen in high grade gliomas. A control group of classic CCRCC with no variant morphologies was also included. Both groups were analyzed for clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features. No statistically significant differences in mRNA expression of studied genes between the two groups were found. Using NGS panel Trusight Oncology 500 (TSO500), only one clinically significant gene mutation, VHL c.263G > A, p. (Trp88Ter), was found. TMB (Tumor Mutation Burden) and MSI (MicroSatellite Instability) were low, and no copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in the study cohort. Prominent microvascular hyperplasia in CCRCC is a rare phenomenon. From molecular genetic point of view, these tumors do not appear to be different from classic CCRCC. Prognostically, they also demonstrated similar clinical behaviors.

Renal cell tumor with sex-cord/gonadoblastoma-like features: analysis of 6 cases

Renal tumors are one of the most diverse groups of tumors in pathology. Many emerging and important entities have been described recently. Here, we describe a series of renal tumors occurring in adult patients, with distinct histologic features, and with a striking resemblance to gonadal sex cord-stromal tumors. Patients were three males and three females aged 39-82 years; tumor size ranged from 0.9 to 3.6 cm. Five tumors were organ-confined, while one case had a focal perinephric invasion. No aggressive behavior was noted. Microscopically, all the tumors were composed of loose or compact tubular structures with elongated or angulated shapes. The tumor cells were cylindrical or cuboidal, with pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, irregular nuclear membranes, and ISUP/WHO grade 2-3 nuclei. The stroma showed focal or prominent collagen deposition with prominent basement membrane-like material. In all cases, the tumor cells were positive for PAX8, CD10, and vimentin and retained positivity for FH and SDHB. Cathepsin K and AMACR were variably positive. Tumors were negative for HMB45, Melan A, TFE3, SF1, inhibin, calretinin, ER, PR, CD117, OCT3/4, SALL4, ALK, and WT1. Molecular studies showed no abnormalities in TFEB, TFE3, or FH genes. In 3/4 tested cases, mutation of the NF2 gene was present. In all the tested male cases, loss of the Y chromosome was found. In the relatively short follow-up, these tumors appear to have indolent behavior. This study expands the clinicopathologic diversity of renal cell tumors by describing a series of potentially novel tumors morphologically resembling gonadal sex-stromal tumors, with negativity for sex cord-stromal markers. Potential relationship to recently described biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous renal cell carcinoma is discussed.

Undifferentiated and dedifferentiated urological carcinomas: lessons learned from the recent developments

Loss of the morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics of a neoplasm is a well-known phenomenon in surgical pathology and occurs across different tumor types in almost all organs. This process may be either partial, characterized by transition from well differentiated to undifferentiated tumor component (=dedifferentiated carcinomas) or complete (=undifferentiated carcinomas). Diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma is significantly influenced by the extent of sampling. Although the concept of undifferentiated and dedifferentiated carcinoma has been well established for other organs (e.g. endometrium), it still has not been fully defined for urological carcinomas. Accordingly, undifferentiated/ dedifferentiated genitourinary carcinomas are typically lumped into the spectrum of poorly differentiated, sarcomatoid, or unclassified (NOS) carcinomas. In the kidney, dedifferentiation occurs across all subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but certain genetically defined RCC types (SDH-, FH- and PBRM1- deficient RCC) seem to have inherent tendency to dedifferentiate. Histologically, the undifferentiated component displays variable combination of four patterns: spindle cells, pleomorphic giant cells, rhabdoid cells, and undifferentiated monomorphic cells with/without prominent osteoclastic giant cells. Any of these may occasionally be associated with heterologous mesenchymal component/s. Their immunophenotype is often simple with expression of vimentin and variably pankeratin or EMA. Precise subtyping of undifferentiated (urothelial versus RCC and the exact underlying RCC subtype) is best done by thorough sampling supplemented as necessary by immunohistochemistry (e.g. FH, SDHB, ALK) and/ or molecular studies. This review discusses the morphological and molecular genetic spectrum and the recent develoments on the topic of dedifferentiated and undifferentiated genitourinary carcinomas.