1
|
Shao B, Di L. Metastatic breast cancer with double heterozygosity for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes responding to olaparib: A case report. Oncol Lett 2024; 27:253. [PMID: 38646498 PMCID: PMC11027096 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Olaparib was the first poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor approved for patients with cancer with mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 in China. To the best of our knowledge, however, no study has described the efficacy of olaparib for patients with breast cancer with double mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The present case report describes a patient with breast cancer with deleterious germline mutations in both BRCA1 and BRCA2. The 56-year-old patient with multiple metastatic breast cancer underwent breast cancer resection with 12 years interval between removal of the left and right breast. Germline mutations in both BRCA1 (S405X) and BRCA2 (W2990X) were identified by NGS. She received two cycles of chemotherapy with a combination of albumin-bound paclitaxel and capecitabine; the response was progressive disease. Subsequently, the patient was treated with a gradual dosage of decreasing olaparib (600 to 300 mg BID) for 6 months until grade 3 anemia could not be alleviated by giving erythropoietin and iron, and CT imaging showed a partial response (35% reduction). The patient then switched to exemestane therapy due to the continuous grade 3 anemia. In conclusion, the present study reported a female patient with double heterozygosity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 who benefited from olaparib monotherapy. Thus, olaparib may be a suitable treatment for such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Shao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China
| | - Lijun Di
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piombino C, Pipitone S, Tonni E, Mastrodomenico L, Oltrecolli M, Tchawa C, Matranga R, Roccabruna S, D’Agostino E, Pirola M, Bacchelli F, Baldessari C, Baschieri MC, Dominici M, Sabbatini R, Vitale MG. Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: New Therapeutic Opportunities. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4624. [PMID: 38731844 PMCID: PMC11083429 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
More than 20% of metastatic prostate cancer carries genomic defects involving DNA damage repair pathways, mainly in homologous recombination repair-related genes. The recent approval of olaparib has paved the way to precision medicine for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with PARP inhibitors in this subset of patients, especially in the case of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. In face of this new therapeutic opportunity, many issues remain unsolved. This narrative review aims to describe the relationship between homologous recombination repair deficiency and prostate cancer, the techniques used to determine homologous recombination repair status in prostate cancer, the crosstalk between homologous recombination repair and the androgen receptor pathway, the current evidence on PARP inhibitors activity in metastatic prostate cancer also in homologous recombination repair-proficient tumors, as well as emerging mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors. The possibility of combination therapies including a PARP inhibitor is an attractive option, and more robust data are awaited from ongoing phase II and phase III trials outlined in this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Piombino
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Stefania Pipitone
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Elena Tonni
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Luciana Mastrodomenico
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Marco Oltrecolli
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Cyrielle Tchawa
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Rossana Matranga
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Sara Roccabruna
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Elisa D’Agostino
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Marta Pirola
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Francesca Bacchelli
- Clinical Trials Office, Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy;
| | - Cinzia Baldessari
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Maria Cristina Baschieri
- Laboratory of Cellular Therapy, Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy;
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
- Laboratory of Cellular Therapy, Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy;
| | - Roberto Sabbatini
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| | - Maria Giuseppa Vitale
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy; (C.P.); (S.P.); (E.T.); (L.M.); (M.O.); (C.T.); (R.M.); (S.R.); (E.D.); (M.P.); (C.B.); (M.D.); (R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harvey-Jones E, Raghunandan M, Robbez-Masson L, Magraner-Pardo L, Alaguthurai T, Yablonovitch A, Yen J, Xiao H, Brough R, Frankum J, Song F, Yeung J, Savy T, Gulati A, Alexander J, Kemp H, Starling C, Konde A, Marlow R, Cheang M, Proszek P, Hubank M, Cai M, Trendell J, Lu R, Liccardo R, Ravindran N, Llop-Guevara A, Rodriguez O, Balmana J, Lukashchuk N, Dorschner M, Drusbosky L, Roxanis I, Serra V, Haider S, Pettitt SJ, Lord CJ, Tutt ANJ. Longitudinal profiling identifies co-occurring BRCA1/2 reversions, TP53BP1, RIF1 and PAXIP1 mutations in PARP inhibitor-resistant advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:364-380. [PMID: 38244928 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resistance to therapies that target homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer limits their overall effectiveness. Multiple, preclinically validated, mechanisms of resistance have been proposed, but their existence and relative frequency in clinical disease are unclear, as is how to target resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS Longitudinal mutation and methylation profiling of circulating tumour (ct)DNA was carried out in 47 patients with metastatic BRCA1-, BRCA2- or PALB2-mutant breast cancer treated with HRD-targeted therapy who developed progressive disease-18 patients had primary resistance and 29 exhibited response followed by resistance. ctDNA isolated at multiple time points in the patient treatment course (before, on-treatment and at progression) was sequenced using a novel >750-gene intron/exon targeted sequencing panel. Where available, matched tumour biopsies were whole exome and RNA sequenced and also used to assess nuclear RAD51. RESULTS BRCA1/2 reversion mutations were present in 60% of patients and were the most prevalent form of resistance. In 10 cases, reversions were detected in ctDNA before clinical progression. Two new reversion-based mechanisms were identified: (i) intragenic BRCA1/2 deletions with intronic breakpoints; and (ii) intragenic BRCA1/2 secondary mutations that formed novel splice acceptor sites, the latter being confirmed by in vitro minigene reporter assays. When seen before commencing subsequent treatment, reversions were associated with significantly shorter time to progression. Tumours with reversions retained HRD mutational signatures but had functional homologous recombination based on RAD51 status. Although less frequent than reversions, nonreversion mechanisms [loss-of-function (LoF) mutations in TP53BP1, RIF1 or PAXIP1] were evident in patients with acquired resistance and occasionally coexisted with reversions, challenging the notion that singular resistance mechanisms emerge in each patient. CONCLUSIONS These observations map the prevalence of candidate drivers of resistance across time in a clinical setting, information with implications for clinical management and trial design in HRD breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Harvey-Jones
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK; The City of London Cancer Research UK Centre at King's College London, UK
| | - M Raghunandan
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Robbez-Masson
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Magraner-Pardo
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - T Alaguthurai
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | | | - J Yen
- Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, USA
| | - H Xiao
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Brough
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Frankum
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - F Song
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Yeung
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - T Savy
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Gulati
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Alexander
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - H Kemp
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Starling
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Konde
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Marlow
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Cheang
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Proszek
- Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Hubank
- Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Cai
- Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, USA
| | - J Trendell
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | - R Lu
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | - R Liccardo
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | - N Ravindran
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - O Rodriguez
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Balmana
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - I Roxanis
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - V Serra
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Haider
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S J Pettitt
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - C J Lord
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - A N J Tutt
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK; The City of London Cancer Research UK Centre at King's College London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Concin N, Davidson B, Fotopoulou C, González-Martin A, Gourley C, Leary A, Lorusso D, Banerjee S, Chiva L, Cibula D, Colombo N, Croce S, Eriksson AG, Falandry C, Fischerova D, Harter P, Joly F, Lazaro C, Lok C, Mahner S, Marmé F, Marth C, McCluggage WG, McNeish IA, Morice P, Nicum S, Oaknin A, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Pignata S, Ramirez PT, Ray-Coquard I, Romero I, Scambia G, Sehouli J, Shapira-Frommer R, Sundar S, Tan DSP, Taskiran C, van Driel WJ, Vergote I, Planchamp F, Sessa C, Fagotti A. ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:248-266. [PMID: 38307807 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- CIBERONC, Madrid; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLLEIDA, University of Lleida, Lleida; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - B Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A González-Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumours-Cima, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Gourley
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Leary
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - S Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Chiva
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - S Croce
- Department of Biopathology, Bergonié Institut, Bordeaux, France
| | - A G Eriksson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Falandry
- Institute of Aging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon; CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U1060/Université Lyon 1/INRAE U1397/Hospices Civils Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany
| | - F Joly
- GINECO Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François-Baclesse, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
| | - C Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL-CIBERONC), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Lok
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Mahner
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - F Marmé
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - C Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - W G McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - I A McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Nicum
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Oaknin
- Gynaecologic Cancer Programme, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario - INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| | - I Romero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - G Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - J Sehouli
- North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin; Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - S Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D S P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University of Singapore (NUS) Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Taskiran
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - W J van Driel
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - C Sessa
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - A Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andronikou C, Burdova K, Dibitetto D, Lieftink C, Malzer E, Kuiken HJ, Gogola E, Ray Chaudhuri A, Beijersbergen RL, Hanzlikova H, Jonkers J, Rottenberg S. PARG-deficient tumor cells have an increased dependence on EXO1/FEN1-mediated DNA repair. EMBO J 2024; 43:1015-1042. [PMID: 38360994 PMCID: PMC10943112 DOI: 10.1038/s44318-024-00043-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Targeting poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) is currently explored as a therapeutic approach to treat various cancer types, but we have a poor understanding of the specific genetic vulnerabilities that would make cancer cells susceptible to such a tailored therapy. Moreover, the identification of such vulnerabilities is of interest for targeting BRCA2;p53-deficient tumors that have acquired resistance to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) through loss of PARG expression. Here, by performing whole-genome CRISPR/Cas9 drop-out screens, we identify various genes involved in DNA repair to be essential for the survival of PARG;BRCA2;p53-deficient cells. In particular, our findings reveal EXO1 and FEN1 as major synthetic lethal interactors of PARG loss. We provide evidence for compromised replication fork progression, DNA single-strand break repair, and Okazaki fragment processing in PARG;BRCA2;p53-deficient cells, alterations that exacerbate the effects of EXO1/FEN1 inhibition and become lethal in this context. Since this sensitivity is dependent on BRCA2 defects, we propose to target EXO1/FEN1 in PARPi-resistant tumors that have lost PARG activity. Moreover, EXO1/FEN1 targeting may be a useful strategy for enhancing the effect of PARG inhibitors in homologous recombination-deficient tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Andronikou
- Institute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Therapy Resistance Cluster and Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3088, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kamila Burdova
- Laboratory of Genome Dynamics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic
| | - Diego Dibitetto
- Institute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Cancer Therapy Resistance Cluster and Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3088, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cor Lieftink
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute Robotics and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elke Malzer
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute Robotics and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Kuiken
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute Robotics and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ewa Gogola
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arnab Ray Chaudhuri
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roderick L Beijersbergen
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute Robotics and Screening Center, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hana Hanzlikova
- Institute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Genome Dynamics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic
| | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sven Rottenberg
- Institute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Therapy Resistance Cluster and Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Department for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3088, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walmsley CS, Jonsson P, Cheng ML, McBride S, Kaeser C, Vargas HA, Laudone V, Taylor BS, Kappagantula R, Baez P, Richards AL, Noronha AM, Perera D, Berger M, Solit DB, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Scher HI, Donoghue MTA, Abida W, Schram AM. Convergent evolution of BRCA2 reversion mutations under therapeutic pressure by PARP inhibition and platinum chemotherapy. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:34. [PMID: 38355834 PMCID: PMC10866935 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00526-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Reversion mutations that restore wild-type function of the BRCA gene have been described as a key mechanism of resistance to Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy in BRCA-associated cancers. Here, we report a case of a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with a germline BRCA2 mutation who developed acquired resistance to PARP inhibition. Extensive genomic interrogation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tissue at baseline, post-progression, and postmortem revealed ten unique BRCA2 reversion mutations across ten sites. While several of the reversion mutations were private to a specific site, nine out of ten tumors contained at least one mutation, suggesting a powerful clonal selection for reversion mutations in the presence of therapeutic pressure by PARP inhibition. Variable cfDNA shed was seen across tumor sites, emphasizing a potential shortcoming of cfDNA monitoring for PARPi resistance. This report provides a genomic portrait of the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of prostate cancer under the selective pressure of a PARP inhibition and exposes limitations in the current strategies for detection of reversion mutations.
Collapse
Grants
- P30 CA008748 NCI NIH HHS
- Grant funding from ASCO Conquer Cancer Foundation CDA, NCI P30CA008748 CCITLA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748).
- WA has received honoraria from Roche, Medscape, Aptitude Health, Clinical Education Alliance, OncLive/MJH Life Sciences, touchIME, Pfizer, and the MedNet. WA has also received advisory board compensation from Clovis Oncology, ORIC pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Pfizer and Laekna Therapeutics, and research funding from AstraZeneca, Zenith Epigenetics, Clovis Oncology, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Epizyme, Nuvation Bio, Merus, and Transthera.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte S Walmsley
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Philip Jonsson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Michael L Cheng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Sean McBride
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Vincent Laudone
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Priscilla Baez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Dilmi Perera
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Michael Berger
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Howard I Scher
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Wassim Abida
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Alison M Schram
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kanev PB, Atemin A, Stoynov S, Aleksandrov R. PARP1 roles in DNA repair and DNA replication: The basi(c)s of PARP inhibitor efficacy and resistance. Semin Oncol 2024; 51:2-18. [PMID: 37714792 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
Genome integrity is under constant insult from endogenous and exogenous sources. In order to cope, eukaryotic cells have evolved an elaborate network of DNA repair that can deal with diverse lesion types and exhibits considerable functional redundancy. PARP1 is a major sensor of DNA breaks with established and putative roles in a number of pathways within the DNA repair network, including repair of single- and double-strand breaks as well as protection of the DNA replication fork. Importantly, PARP1 is the major target of small-molecule PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which are employed in the treatment of homologous recombination (HR)-deficient tumors, as the latter are particularly susceptible to the accumulation of DNA damage due to an inability to efficiently repair highly toxic double-strand DNA breaks. The clinical success of PARPi has fostered extensive research into PARP biology, which has shed light on the involvement of PARP1 in various genomic transactions. A major goal within the field has been to understand the relationship between catalytic inhibition and PARP1 trapping. The specific consequences of inhibition and trapping on genomic stability as a basis for the cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitors remain a matter of debate. Finally, PARP inhibition is increasingly recognized for its capacity to elicit/modulate anti-tumor immunity. The clinical potential of PARP inhibition is, however, hindered by the development of resistance. Hence, extensive efforts are invested in identifying factors that promote resistance or sensitize cells to PARPi. The current review provides a summary of advances in our understanding of PARP1 biology, the mechanistic nature, and molecular consequences of PARP inhibition, as well as the mechanisms that give rise to PARPi resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petar-Bogomil Kanev
- Laboratory of Genomic Stability, Institute of Molecular Biology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Aleksandar Atemin
- Laboratory of Genomic Stability, Institute of Molecular Biology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Stoyno Stoynov
- Laboratory of Genomic Stability, Institute of Molecular Biology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
| | - Radoslav Aleksandrov
- Laboratory of Genomic Stability, Institute of Molecular Biology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nakamura K, Hayashi H, Kawano R, Ishikawa M, Aimono E, Mizuno T, Kuroda H, Kojima Y, Niikura N, Kawanishi A, Takeshita K, Suzuki S, Ueno S, Okuwaki K, Sasaki J, Yamaguchi M, Masuda K, Chiyoda T, Yamagami W, Okada C, Nohara S, Tanishima S, Nishihara H. BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in a pan-cancer cohort. Cancer Sci 2024; 115:635-647. [PMID: 38041241 PMCID: PMC10859608 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor sensitivity to platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy and poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors is increased by homologous recombination deficiency-causing mutations; in particular, reversion mutations cause drug resistance by restoring protein function. Treatment response is predicted by breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutations; however, BRCA1/2 reversion mutations have not been comprehensively studied in pan-cancer cohorts. We aimed to characterize BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in a large pan-cancer cohort of Japanese patients by retrospectively analyzing sequencing data for BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations in 3738 patients with 32 cancer types. We identified somatic mutations in tumors or circulating cell-free DNA that could restore the ORF of adverse alleles, including reversion mutations. We identified 12 (0.32%) patients with somatic BRCA1 (n = 3) and BRCA2 (n = 9) reversion mutations in breast (n = 4), ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal (n = 4), pancreatic (n = 2), prostate (n = 1), and gallbladder (n = 1) cancers. We identified 21 reversion events-BRCA1 (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 18)-including eight pure deletions, one single-nucleotide variant, six multinucleotide variants, and six deletion-insertions. Seven (33.3%) reversion deletions showed a microhomology length greater than 1 bp, suggesting microhomology-mediated end-join repair. Disease course data were obtained for all patients with reversion events: four patients acquired mutations after PARP-inhibitor treatment failure, two showed somatic reversion mutations after disease progression, following Pt-based treatment, five showed mutations after both treatments, one patient with pancreatic cancer and BRCA1 reversion mutations had no history of either treatment. Although reversion mutations commonly occur in BRCA-associated cancers, our findings suggest that reversion mutations due to Pt-chemotherapy might be correlated with BRCA1/2-mediated tumorigenesis even in non-BRCA-associated histologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Nakamura
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer CenterKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKumagaya General HospitalKumagayaJapan
| | - Hideyuki Hayashi
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer CenterKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Ryutaro Kawano
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer CenterKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Marin Ishikawa
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer CenterKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Eriko Aimono
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer CenterKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of MedicineHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Takaaki Mizuno
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer CenterKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hajime Kuroda
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Adachi Medical CenterTokyo Women's Medical UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuyuki Kojima
- Showa University Institute for Clinical Genetics and GenomicsTokyoJapan
| | - Naoki Niikura
- Department of Breast OncologyTokai University School of MedicineIseharaJapan
| | - Aya Kawanishi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal MedicineTokai University School of MedicineIseharaJapan
| | - Kei Takeshita
- Department of Clinical GeneticsTokai University HospitalIseharaJapan
| | | | - Shinichi Ueno
- Cancer CenterKagoshima University HospitalKagoshimaJapan
| | - Kosuke Okuwaki
- Department of GastroenterologyKitasato University School of MedicineSagamiharaJapan
| | - Jiichiro Sasaki
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Comprehensive Medicine, Research and Development Center for New Medical FrontiersKitasato University School of MedicineSagamiharaJapan
| | | | - Kenta Masuda
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Tatsuyuki Chiyoda
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Wataru Yamagami
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Chihiro Okada
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic Systems Business GroupMitsubishi Electric Software Co., Ltd.AmagasakiJapan
| | - Sachio Nohara
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic Systems Business GroupMitsubishi Electric Software Co., Ltd.AmagasakiJapan
| | - Shigeki Tanishima
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic Systems Business GroupMitsubishi Electric Software Co., Ltd.AmagasakiJapan
| | - Hiroshi Nishihara
- Genomics Unit, Keio Cancer CenterKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fu X, Li P, Zhou Q, He R, Wang G, Zhu S, Bagheri A, Kupfer G, Pei H, Li J. Mechanism of PARP inhibitor resistance and potential overcoming strategies. Genes Dis 2024; 11:306-320. [PMID: 37588193 PMCID: PMC10425807 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2023.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are a kind of cancer therapy that targets poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. PARPi is the first clinically approved drug to exert synthetic lethality by obstructing the DNA single-strand break repair process. Despite the significant therapeutic effect in patients with homologous recombination (HR) repair deficiency, innate and acquired resistance to PARPi is a main challenge in the clinic. In this review, we mainly discussed the underlying mechanisms of PARPi resistance and summarized the promising solutions to overcome PARPi resistance, aiming at extending PARPi application and improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Fu
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China
| | - Ping Li
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China
| | - Qi Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China
| | - Ruyuan He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China
| | - Guannan Wang
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Shiya Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Amir Bagheri
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Gary Kupfer
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Huadong Pei
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Juanjuan Li
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Biegała Ł, Gajek A, Szymczak-Pajor I, Marczak A, Śliwińska A, Rogalska A. Targeted inhibition of the ATR/CHK1 pathway overcomes resistance to olaparib and dysregulates DNA damage response protein expression in BRCA2 MUT ovarian cancer cells. Sci Rep 2023; 13:22659. [PMID: 38114660 PMCID: PMC10730696 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50151-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) approved for targeted treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). However, its efficacy is impeded by the inevitable occurrence of resistance. Here, we investigated whether the cytotoxic activity of olaparib could be synergistically enhanced in olaparib-resistant OC cells with BRCA2 reversion mutation by the addition of inhibitors of the ATR/CHK1 pathway. Moreover, we provide insights into alterations in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway induced by combination treatments. Antitumor activity of olaparib alone or combined with an ATR inhibitor (ATRi, ceralasertib) or CHK1 inhibitor (CHK1i, MK-8776) was evaluated in OC cell lines sensitive (PEO1, PEO4) and resistant (PEO1-OR) to olaparib. Antibody microarrays were used to explore changes in expression of 27 DDR-related proteins. Olaparib in combination with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors synergistically induced a decrease in viability and clonogenic survival and an increase in apoptosis mediated by caspase-3/7 in all OC cells. Combination treatments induced cumulative alterations in expression of DDR-related proteins mediating distinct DNA repair pathways and cell cycle control. In the presence of ATRi and CHK1i, olaparib-induced upregulation of proteins determining cell fate after DNA damage (PARP1, CHK1, c-Abl, Ku70, Ku80, MDM2, and p21) was abrogated in PEO1-OR cells. Overall, the addition of ATRi or CHK1i to olaparib effectively overcomes resistance to PARPi exerting anti-proliferative effect in BRCA2MUT olaparib-resistant OC cells and alters expression of DDR-related proteins. These new molecular insights into cellular response to olaparib combined with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors might help improve targeted therapies for olaparib-resistant OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Biegała
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland
- Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Lodz, 21/23 Jana Matejki Street, 90-237, Lodz, Poland
| | - Arkadiusz Gajek
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland
| | - Izabela Szymczak-Pajor
- Department of Nucleic Acid Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska Street, 92-213, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Marczak
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Śliwińska
- Department of Nucleic Acid Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska Street, 92-213, Lodz, Poland
| | - Aneta Rogalska
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 141/143 Pomorska Street, 90-236, Lodz, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tsimberidou AM, Kahle M, Vo HH, Baysal MA, Johnson A, Meric-Bernstam F. Molecular tumour boards - current and future considerations for precision oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:843-863. [PMID: 37845306 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00824-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, rapid progress has been made in developmental therapeutics, especially regarding the use of matched targeted therapies against specific oncogenic molecular alterations across cancer types. Molecular tumour boards (MTBs) are panels of expert physicians, scientists, health-care providers and patient advocates who review and interpret molecular-profiling results for individual patients with cancer and match each patient to available therapies, which can include investigational drugs. Interpretation of the molecular alterations found in each patient is a complicated task that requires an understanding of their contextual functional effects and their correlations with sensitivity or resistance to specific treatments. The criteria for determining the actionability of molecular alterations and selecting matched treatments are constantly evolving. Therefore, MTBs have an increasingly necessary role in optimizing the allocation of biomarker-directed therapies and the implementation of precision oncology. Ultimately, increased MTB availability, accessibility and performance are likely to improve patient care. The challenges faced by MTBs are increasing, owing to the plethora of identifiable molecular alterations and immune markers in tumours of individual patients and their evolving clinical significance as more and more data on patient outcomes and results from clinical trials become available. Beyond next-generation sequencing, broader biomarker analyses can provide useful information. However, greater funding, resources and expertise are needed to ensure the sustainability of MTBs and expand their outreach to underserved populations. Harmonization between practice and policy will be required to optimally implement precision oncology. Herein, we discuss the evolving role of MTBs and current and future considerations for their use in precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Kahle
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mehmet A Baysal
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amber Johnson
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Veneziani AC, Gonzalez-Ochoa E, Alqaisi H, Madariaga A, Bhat G, Rouzbahman M, Sneha S, Oza AM. Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:820-842. [PMID: 37783747 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00819-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinoma is characterized by heterogeneity at the molecular, cellular and anatomical levels, both spatially and temporally. This heterogeneity affects response to surgery and/or systemic therapy, and also facilitates inherent and acquired drug resistance. As a consequence, this tumour type is often aggressive and frequently lethal. Ovarian carcinoma is not a single disease entity and comprises various subtypes, each with distinct complex molecular landscapes that change during progression and therapy. The interactions of cancer and stromal cells within the tumour microenvironment further affects disease evolution and response to therapy. In past decades, researchers have characterized the cellular, molecular, microenvironmental and immunological heterogeneity of ovarian carcinoma. Traditional treatment approaches have considered ovarian carcinoma as a single entity. This landscape is slowly changing with the increasing appreciation of heterogeneity and the recognition that delivering ineffective therapies can delay the development of effective personalized approaches as well as potentially change the molecular and cellular characteristics of the tumour, which might lead to additional resistance to subsequent therapy. In this Review we discuss the heterogeneity of ovarian carcinoma, outline the current treatment landscape for this malignancy and highlight potentially effective therapeutic strategies in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C Veneziani
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eduardo Gonzalez-Ochoa
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Husam Alqaisi
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ainhoa Madariaga
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 De Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gita Bhat
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marjan Rouzbahman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Suku Sneha
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang T, Li W, Huang T, Zhou J. Genetic Testing Enhances the Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16607. [PMID: 38068930 PMCID: PMC10706486 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The contemporary comprehension of breast cancer has progressed to the molecular level. As a heterogeneous malignancy, conventional pathological diagnosis and histological classification could no longer meet the needs of precisely managing breast cancer. Genetic testing based on gene expression profiles and gene mutations has emerged and substantially contributed to the precise diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Multigene assays (MGAs) are explored for early-stage breast cancer patients, aiding the selection of adjuvant therapy and predicting prognosis. For metastatic breast cancer patients, testing specific genes indicates potentially effective antitumor agents. In this review, genetic testing in early-stage and metastatic breast cancer is summarized, as well as the advantages and challenges of genetic testing in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tao Huang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China (W.L.)
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China (W.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xu Y, Spear S, Ma Y, Lorentzen MP, Gruet M, McKinney F, Xu Y, Wickremesinghe C, Shepherd MR, McNeish I, Keun HC, Nijhuis A. Pharmacological depletion of RNA splicing factor RBM39 by indisulam synergizes with PARP inhibitors in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Cell Rep 2023; 42:113307. [PMID: 37858464 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common subtype of ovarian cancer with limited therapeutic options and a poor prognosis. In recent years, poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have demonstrated significant clinical benefits, especially in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. However, acquired drug resistance and relapse is a major challenge. Indisulam (E7070) has been identified as a molecular glue that brings together splicing factor RBM39 and DCAF15 E3 ubiquitin ligase resulting in polyubiquitination, degradation, and subsequent RNA splicing defects. In this work, we demonstrate that the loss of RBM39 induces splicing defects in key DNA damage repair genes in ovarian cancer, leading to increased sensitivity to cisplatin and various PARP inhibitors. The addition of indisulam also improved olaparib response in mice bearing PARP inhibitor-resistant tumors. These findings demonstrate that combining RBM39 degraders and PARP inhibitors is a promising therapeutic approach to improve PARP inhibitor response in ovarian HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuewei Xu
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Spear
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yurui Ma
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marc P Lorentzen
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Gruet
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Flora McKinney
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yitao Xu
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Chiharu Wickremesinghe
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Iain McNeish
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hector C Keun
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Anke Nijhuis
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Syed A, Filandr F, Patterson-Fortin J, Bacolla A, Ravindranathan R, Zhou J, McDonald D, Albuhluli M, Verway-Cohen A, Newman J, Tsai MS, Jones D, Schriemer D, D’Andrea A, Tainer J. Novobiocin blocks nucleic acid binding to Polθ and inhibits stimulation of its ATPase activity. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:9920-9937. [PMID: 37665033 PMCID: PMC10570058 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Polymerase theta (Polθ) acts in DNA replication and repair, and its inhibition is synthetic lethal in BRCA1 and BRCA2-deficient tumor cells. Novobiocin (NVB) is a first-in-class inhibitor of the Polθ ATPase activity, and it is currently being tested in clinical trials as an anti-cancer drug. Here, we investigated the molecular mechanism of NVB-mediated Polθ inhibition. Using hydrogen deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry (HX-MS), biophysical, biochemical, computational and cellular assays, we found NVB is a non-competitive inhibitor of ATP hydrolysis. NVB sugar group deletion resulted in decreased potency and reduced HX-MS interactions, supporting a specific NVB binding orientation. Collective results revealed that NVB binds to an allosteric site to block DNA binding, both in vitro and in cells. Comparisons of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) tumors and matched controls implied that POLQ upregulation in tumors stems from its role in replication stress responses to increased cell proliferation: this can now be tested in fifteen tumor types by NVB blocking ssDNA-stimulation of ATPase activity, required for Polθ function at replication forks and DNA damage sites. Structural and functional insights provided in this study suggest a path for developing NVB derivatives with improved potency for Polθ inhibition by targeting ssDNA binding with entropically constrained small molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleem Syed
- Division of Radiation and Genome Instability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Frantisek Filandr
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Patterson-Fortin
- Division of Radiation and Genome Instability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Albino Bacolla
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ramya Ravindranathan
- Division of Radiation and Genome Instability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Jia Zhou
- Division of Radiation and Genome Instability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Drew T McDonald
- Biological and System Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Mohammed E Albuhluli
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Amy Verway-Cohen
- Biological and System Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Joseph A Newman
- Center for Medicines Discovery, University of Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK
| | - Miaw-Sheue Tsai
- Biological and System Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Darin E Jones
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - David C Schriemer
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Alan D D’Andrea
- Division of Radiation and Genome Instability, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Center for DNA Damage and Repair, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - John A Tainer
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li Z, Luo A, Xie B. The Complex Network of ADP-Ribosylation and DNA Repair: Emerging Insights and Implications for Cancer Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:15028. [PMID: 37834477 PMCID: PMC10573881 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241915028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
ADP-ribosylation is a post-translational modification of proteins that plays a key role in various cellular processes, including DNA repair. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanism and function of ADP-ribosylation in DNA repair. ADP-ribosylation can regulate the recruitment and activity of DNA repair proteins by facilitating protein-protein interactions and regulating protein conformations. Moreover, ADP-ribosylation can influence additional post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins involved in DNA repair, such as ubiquitination, methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and SUMOylation. The interaction between ADP-ribosylation and these additional PTMs can fine-tune the activity of DNA repair proteins and ensure the proper execution of the DNA repair process. In addition, PARP inhibitors have been developed as a promising cancer therapeutic strategy by exploiting the dependence of certain cancer types on the PARP-mediated DNA repair pathway. In this paper, we review the progress of ADP-ribosylation in DNA repair, discuss the crosstalk of ADP-ribosylation with additional PTMs in DNA repair, and summarize the progress of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aiqin Luo
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biological Diagnosis and Treatment (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology), School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Bingteng Xie
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biological Diagnosis and Treatment (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology), School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Garg V, Oza AM. Treatment of Ovarian Cancer Beyond PARP Inhibition: Current and Future Options. Drugs 2023; 83:1365-1385. [PMID: 37737434 PMCID: PMC10581945 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01934-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecological cancer death. Improved understanding of the biologic pathways and introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) during the last decade have changed the treatment landscape. This has improved outcomes, but unfortunately half the women with ovarian cancer still succumb to the disease within 5 years of diagnosis. Pathways of resistance to PARPi and chemotherapy have been studied extensively, but there is an unmet need to overcome treatment failure and improve outcome. Major mechanisms of PARPi resistance include restoration of homologous recombination repair activity, alteration of PARP function, stabilization of the replication fork, drug efflux, and activation of alternate pathways. These resistant mechanisms can be targeted to sensitize the resistant ovarian cancer cells either by rechallenging with PARPi, overcoming resistance mechanism or bypassing resistance pathways. Augmenting the PARPi activity by combining it with other targets in the DNA damage response pathway, antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors can potentially overcome the resistance mechanisms. Methods to bypass resistance include targeting non-cross-resistant pathways acting independent of homologous recombination repair (HRR), modulating tumour microenvironment, and enhancing drug delivery systems such as antibody drug conjugates. In this review, we will discuss the first-line management of ovarian cancer, resistance mechanisms and potential strategies to overcome these.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Garg
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- , 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bhamidipati D, Haro-Silerio JI, Yap TA, Ngoi N. PARP inhibitors: enhancing efficacy through rational combinations. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:904-916. [PMID: 37430137 PMCID: PMC10491787 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02326-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have significantly changed the treatment landscape for tumours harbouring defects in genes involved in homologous repair (HR) such as BRCA1 and BRCA2. Despite initial responsiveness to PARPi, tumours eventually develop resistance through a variety of mechanisms. Rational combination strategies involving PARPi have been explored and are in various stages of clinical development. PARPi combinations have the potential to enhance efficacy through synergistic activity, and also potentially sensitise innately PARPi-resistant tumours to PARPi. Initial combinations involving PARPi with chemotherapy were hindered by significant overlapping haematologic toxicity, but newer combinations with fewer toxicities and more targeted approaches are undergoing evaluation. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of PARPi resistance and review the rationale and clinical evidence for various PARPi combinations including combinations with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies. We also highlight emerging PARPi combinations with promising preclinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Bhamidipati
- Department of Cancer Medicine Fellowship Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- The Institute for Applied Cancer Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Natalie Ngoi
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pettitt SJ, Shao N, Zatreanu D, Frankum J, Bajrami I, Brough R, Krastev DB, Roumeliotis TI, Choudhary JS, Lorenz S, Rust A, de Bono JS, Yap TA, Tutt ANJ, Lord CJ. A HUWE1 defect causes PARP inhibitor resistance by modulating the BRCA1-∆11q splice variant. Oncogene 2023; 42:2701-2709. [PMID: 37491606 PMCID: PMC10473960 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-023-02782-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Although PARP inhibitors (PARPi) now form part of the standard-of-care for the treatment of homologous recombination defective cancers, de novo and acquired resistance limits their overall effectiveness. Previously, overexpression of the BRCA1-∆11q splice variant has been shown to cause PARPi resistance. How cancer cells achieve increased BRCA1-∆11q expression has remained unclear. Using isogenic cells with different BRCA1 mutations, we show that reduction in HUWE1 leads to increased levels of BRCA1-∆11q and PARPi resistance. This effect is specific to cells able to express BRCA1-∆11q (e.g. BRCA1 exon 11 mutant cells) and is not seen in BRCA1 mutants that cannot express BRCA1-∆11q, nor in BRCA2 mutant cells. As well as increasing levels of BRCA1-∆11q protein in exon 11 mutant cells, HUWE1 silencing also restores RAD51 nuclear foci and platinum salt resistance. HUWE1 catalytic domain mutations were also seen in a case of PARPi resistant, BRCA1 exon 11 mutant, high grade serous ovarian cancer. These results suggest how elevated levels of BRCA1-∆11q and PARPi resistance can be achieved, identify HUWE1 as a candidate biomarker of PARPi resistance for assessment in future clinical trials and illustrate how some PARPi resistance mechanisms may only operate in patients with particular BRCA1 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK.
| | - Nan Shao
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Diana Zatreanu
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Jessica Frankum
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Ilirjana Bajrami
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Rachel Brough
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Dragomir B Krastev
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | | | | | - Sonja Lorenz
- Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alistair Rust
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Timothy A Yap
- The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Andrew N J Tutt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK.
| | - Christopher J Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Garg V, Oza AM. Assessment of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2957-2960. [PMID: 37347464 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Accurately assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) to use as a predictive biomarker is an area of intense research in ovarian cancer. Validated assays have demonstrated utility in determining maintenance therapy following platinum sensitive chemotherapy. Novel functional assays promise the potential to reflect HRD in real time and predict response to PARP inhibitors. See related articles by Pikkusaari et al., p. 3110 and Blanc-Durand et al., p. 3124.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Garg
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sokolenko A, Preobrazhenskaya E, Marchetti C, Piermattei A, Zagrebin F, Kuligina E, Gorodnova T, Pavone M, Ivantsov A, Bizin I, Scambia G, Berlev I, Fagotti A, Imyanitov E. Origin of Residual Tumor Masses in BRCA1/2-Driven Ovarian Carcinomas Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Selection of Preexisting BRCA1/2-Proficient Tumor Cells but Not the Gain of Second ORF-Restoring Mutation. Pathobiology 2023; 91:108-113. [PMID: 37579727 DOI: 10.1159/000533591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tubo-ovarian carcinomas (OCs) are highly sensitive to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) but almost never demonstrate complete pathologic response. METHODS We analyzed paired primary and residual tumor tissues from 30 patients with hereditary BRCA1/2-driven OCs (BRCA1: 17; BRCA2: 13), who were treated by carboplatin/paclitaxel NACT (median number of cycles: 3, range: 3-6). BRCA1/2 and TP53 genes were analyzed by the next-generation sequencing. The ratio between TP53 mutation-specific versus wild-type reads was considered to monitor the proportion of tumor and non-tumor cells in the tissue sample, and the ratio between BRCA1/2-mutated and wild-type reads was used to estimate the presence of cells with the loss or retention of heterozygosity (LOH or ROH, respectively). RESULTS All 30 OCs had BRCA1/2 LOH in primary tumor and carried somatic TP53 mutation. Twenty-eight OCs had sufficient tumor cell cellularity in the post-NACT tissue to evaluate the ratio between mutated and wild-type BRCA1/2 alleles. Five (18%) out of 28 informative tumor pairs showed transition from LOH to ROH during NACT presumably affecting all or the vast majority of residual tumor cells. There were no signals of the emergence of a second open reading frame-restoring BRCA1/2 mutation. CONCLUSION Chemonaive BRCA1/2-driven carcinomas may contain a fraction of tumor cells with preserved BRCA1/2 heterozygosity. NACT can cause a selection of pre-existing BRCA1/2-proficient tumor cells, without gaining secondary reversal BRCA1/2 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sokolenko
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- Department of Medical Genetics, St. Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Elena Preobrazhenskaya
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Claudia Marchetti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessia Piermattei
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Fedor Zagrebin
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Ekatherina Kuligina
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Tatiana Gorodnova
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Matteo Pavone
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Alexandr Ivantsov
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Ilya Bizin
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Igor Berlev
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Evgeny Imyanitov
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- Department of Medical Genetics, St. Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zielli T, Labidi-Galy I, Del Grande M, Sessa C, Colombo I. The clinical challenges of homologous recombination proficiency in ovarian cancer: from intrinsic resistance to new treatment opportunities. CANCER DRUG RESISTANCE (ALHAMBRA, CALIF.) 2023; 6:499-516. [PMID: 37842243 PMCID: PMC10571062 DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2023.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer. Optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab is the conventional therapeutic strategy. Since 2016, the pharmacological treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer has significantly changed following the introduction of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) have been established as predictive biomarkers of the benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy and PARPi. While in the absence of HRD (the so-called homologous recombination proficiency, HRp), patients derive minimal benefit from PARPi, the use of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab in first line did not result in different efficacy according to the presence of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes mutations. No clinical trials have currently compared PARPi and bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in the HRp population. Different strategies are under investigation to overcome primary and acquired resistance to PARPi and to increase the sensitivity of HRp tumors to these agents. These tumors are characterized by frequent amplifications of Cyclin E and MYC, resulting in high replication stress. Different agents targeting DNA replication stress, such as ATR, WEE1 and CHK1 inhibitors, are currently being explored in preclinical models and clinical trials and have shown promising preliminary signs of activity. In this review, we will summarize the available evidence on the activity of PARPi in HRp tumors and the ongoing research to develop new treatment options in this hard-to-treat population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Zielli
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland
| | - Intidhar Labidi-Galy
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
- Department of Medicine, Center of Translational Research in Onco-Hematology, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
| | - Maria Del Grande
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland
| | - Cristiana Sessa
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland
| | - Ilaria Colombo
- Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona 6500, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cordani N, Bianchi T, Ammoni LC, Cortinovis DL, Cazzaniga ME, Lissoni AA, Landoni F, Canova S. An Overview of PARP Resistance in Ovarian Cancer from a Molecular and Clinical Perspective. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11890. [PMID: 37569269 PMCID: PMC10418869 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241511890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), a primarily high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC), is one of the major causes of high death-to-incidence ratios of all gynecological cancers. Cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy represent the main treatments for this aggressive disease. Molecular characterization of HGSOC has revealed that up to 50% of cases have a deficiency in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) system, which makes these tumors sensitive to poly ADP-ribose inhibitors (PARP-is). However, drug resistance often occurs and overcoming it represents a big challenge. A number of strategies are under investigation, with the most promising being combinations of PARP-is with antiangiogenetic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, new drugs targeting different pathways, including the ATR-CHK1-WEE1, the PI3K-AKT and the RAS/RAF/MEK, are under development both in phase I and II-III clinical trials. Nevertheless, there is still a long way to go, and the next few years promise to be exciting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Cordani
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
| | - Tommaso Bianchi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Carlofrancesco Ammoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
| | | | - Marina Elena Cazzaniga
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Phase 1 Research Centre, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Alberto Lissoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (T.B.); (L.C.A.); (M.E.C.); (A.A.L.); (F.L.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Stefania Canova
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Xia T, Fang C, Chen Y. Advances in application of circulating tumor DNA in ovarian cancer. Funct Integr Genomics 2023; 23:250. [PMID: 37479960 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-023-01181-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the third most common gynecologic cancer worldwide and has the highest mortality rate among gynecologic cancers. Identifying timely and effective biomarkers at different stages of the disease is the key to improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a fragment of free DNA produced by tumor cells in the blood. Current techniques for detecting ctDNA mainly include quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), and non-targeted NGS (such as whole exon or whole genome sequencing). As a non-invasive liquid biopsy technique, ctDNA has a good application prospect in the ovarian cancer diagnosis, monitoring of treatment response and efficacy evaluation, detection of reverse mutation and related medication guidance, and prognosis evaluation. This article reviews the advances in application of ctDNA in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Xia
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chenyan Fang
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yaqing Chen
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim YN, Shim Y, Seo J, Choi Z, Lee YJ, Shin S, Kim SW, Kim S, Choi JR, Lee JY, Lee ST. Investigation of PARP Inhibitor Resistance Based on Serially Collected Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With BRCA-Mutated Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2725-2734. [PMID: 37067525 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-specific molecular alterations leading to PARP inhibitor (PARPi) resistance are relatively unexplored. In this study, we analyzed serially collected circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with BRCA1/2 mutations who received PARPis to investigate the resistance mechanisms and their significance in postprogression treatment response and survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2018 and December 2021 (NCT05458973). Whole-blood samples were obtained before PARPi administration and serially every 3 months until progression. ctDNA was extracted from the samples and sequenced with a 531-gene panel; gene sets for each resistance mechanism were curated. RESULTS Fifty-four patients were included in this analysis. Mutation profiles of genes in pre-PARPi samples indicating a high tumor mutational burden and alterations in genes associated with replication fork stabilization and drug efflux were associated with poor progression-free survival on PARPis. BRCA hypomorphism and reversion were found in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. Among 29 patients with matched samples, mutational heterogeneity increased postprogression on PARPis, showing at least one postspecific mutation in 89.7% of the patients. These mutations indicate non-exclusive acquired resistance mechanisms-homologous recombination repair restoration (28%), replication fork stability (34%), upregulated survival pathway (41%), target loss (10%), and drug efflux (3%). We observed poor progression-free survival with subsequent chemotherapy in patients with homologous recombination repair restoration (P = 0.003) and those with the simultaneous involvement of two or more resistance mechanisms (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS Analysis of serial ctDNAs highlighted multiple acquired resistance mechanisms, providing valuable insights for improving postprogression treatment and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoo-Na Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeeun Shim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jieun Seo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Yong Jae Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Saeam Shin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Wun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunghoon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Rak Choi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Dxome, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Tae Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Dxome, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Morgan RD, Clamp AR, White DJ, Price M, Burghel GJ, Ryder WDJ, Mahmood RD, Murphy AD, Hasan J, Mitchell CL, Salih Z, Wheeler C, Buckley E, Truelove J, King G, Ainaoui Y, Bhaskar SS, Shaw J, Evans DGR, Kilerci B, Pearce SP, Brady G, Dive C, O'Connor JPB, Wallace AJ, Rothwell DG, Edmondson RJ, Jayson GC. Multi-Maintenance Olaparib Therapy in Relapsed, Germline BRCA1/2-Mutant High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (MOLTO): A Phase II Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2602-2611. [PMID: 36799931 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A single maintenance course of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) improves progression-free survival (PFS) in germline BRCA1/2-mutant high-grade serous ovarian cancer (gBRCAm-HGSOC). The feasibility of a second maintenance course of PARPi was unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Phase II trial with two entry points (EP1, EP2). Patients were recruited prior to rechallenge platinum. Patients with relapsed, gBRCAm-HGSOC were enrolled at EP1 if they were PARPi-naïve. Patients enrolled at EP2 had received their first course of olaparib prior to trial entry. EP1 patients were retreated with olaparib after RECIST complete/partial response (CR/PR) to platinum. EP2 patients were retreated with olaparib ± cediranib after RECIST CR/PR/stable disease to platinum and according to the platinum-free interval. Co-primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who received a second course of olaparib and the proportion who received olaparib retreatment for ≥6 months. Functional homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), somatic copy-number alteration (SCNA), and BRCAm reversions were investigated in tumor and liquid biopsies. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were treated (EP1 = 17, EP2 = 10), and 19 were evaluable. Twelve patients (63%) received a second course of olaparib and 4 received olaparib retreatment for ≥6 months. Common grade ≥2 adverse events during olaparib retreatment were anemia, nausea, and fatigue. No cases of MDS/AML occurred. Mean duration of olaparib treatment and retreatment differed (12.1 months vs. 4.4 months; P < 0.001). Functional HRD and SCNA did not predict PFS. A BRCA2 reversion mutation was detected in a post-olaparib liquid biopsy. CONCLUSIONS A second course of olaparib can be safely administered to women with gBRCAm-HGSOC but is only modestly efficacious. See related commentary by Gonzalez-Ochoa and Oza, p. 2563.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Morgan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew R Clamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel J White
- Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Marcus Price
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - George J Burghel
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - W David J Ryder
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Reem D Mahmood
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander D Murphy
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jurjees Hasan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Claire L Mitchell
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Zena Salih
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Chelsey Wheeler
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Buckley
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Truelove
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Georgia King
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Yasmina Ainaoui
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjeev S Bhaskar
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Shaw
- Department of Histopathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bedirhan Kilerci
- Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Simon P Pearce
- Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gerard Brady
- Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Dive
- Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Wallace
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic G Rothwell
- Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon C Jayson
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Huang Y, Zheng D, Yang Q, Wu J, Tian H, Ji Z, Chen L, Cai J, Li Z, Chen Y. Global trends in BRCA-related breast cancer research from 2013 to 2022: A scientometric analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1197168. [PMID: 37476378 PMCID: PMC10354558 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since the mid-2000s, breast cancer incidence among women has slowly increased at about 0.5% per year. In the last three decades, Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene (BRCA) has been proven to be the crucial gene in encouraging the incidence and development of breast cancer. However, scientometric analysis on BRCA-related breast cancer is in shortage. Thus, to have a clear understanding of the current status and catch up with the hotspots, a scientometric analysis was conducted on specific academic publications collected from the Web of Science (WoS). Methods We searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) to procure associated articles as our dataset. Bibliometric, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and HistCite software were then applied to conduct visual analyses of countries, institutions, journals, authors, landmark articles, and keywords in this research field. Results A total of 7,266 articles and 1,310 review articles published between 2013 to 2022 were retrieved eventually. The annual output steadily rose year by year and peaked in 2021. The USA led the way in the number of published works, total citations, and collaboration. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment was the most favoured journal in this research field. Narod SA from the University of Toronto produced the most publications. At last, the most prominent keywords were "breast cancer" (n=1,778), "women" (n=1,369), "brca1" (n=1,276), "ovarian cancer" (n=1,259), "risk" (n=1,181), and "mutations" (n=929), which exposed the hotspots within the BRCA domain of breast cancer study. Conclusion The tendency in the BRCA research field over the past decade was presented by the scientometric analysis. The current research focus is the clinical trials of poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) drugs and their resistance mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhiyang Li
- *Correspondence: Zhiyang Li, ; Yexi Chen,
| | - Yexi Chen
- *Correspondence: Zhiyang Li, ; Yexi Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
O'Malley DM, Krivak TC, Kabil N, Munley J, Moore KN. PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Review. Target Oncol 2023; 18:471-503. [PMID: 37268756 PMCID: PMC10344972 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00970-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have transformed the ovarian cancer (OC) treatment landscape. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of data for the PARPis olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib in patients with OC and discusses their role in disease management, with a focus on the use of PARPis as maintenance therapy in the United States (US). Olaparib was the first PARPi to be approved as first-line maintenance monotherapy in the US, with maintenance niraparib subsequently approved in the first-line setting. Data also support the efficacy of rucaparib as first-line maintenance monotherapy. PARPi maintenance combination therapy (olaparib plus bevacizumab) also provides benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC whose tumors tested positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Biomarker testing is critical in the newly diagnosed setting to identify patients most likely to benefit from PARPi maintenance therapy and guide treatment decisions. Clinical trial data support the use of PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib) as second-line or later maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed OC. Although distinct differences in tolerability profile were observed between PARPis, they were generally well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events managed by dose modification. PARPis had no detrimental effect on patients' health-related quality of life. Real-world data support the use of PARPis in OC, although some differences between PARPis are apparent. Data from trials investigating novel combination strategies, such as PARPis plus immune checkpoint inhibitors, are awaited with interest; the optimal sequencing of novel therapies in OC remains to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA. David.O'
| | | | - Nashwa Kabil
- US Medical Affairs, Oncology Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Jiefen Munley
- Global Patient Safety, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yamamoto S, Kawashima K, Fujiwara Y, Adachi S, Narui K, Hosaka C, Takahashi R, Tsuyuki S, Sugimori M, Tanoshima M, Sasamoto M, Oshi M, Yamada A, Kunisaki C, Endo I. BRCA2 reversion mutation confers resistance to olaparib in breast cancer. Clin Case Rep 2023; 11:e7537. [PMID: 37361653 PMCID: PMC10290195 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.7537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Key Clinical Message A rare missense mutation was identified as a reversion mutation using cancer genomic profiling and a suspected mechanism underlying resistance to olaparib in breast cancer. Abstract A 34-year-old woman with breast cancer and BRCA2: p.Gln3047Ter was treated with olaparib. After tumor progression, cancer genomic profiling testing using liquid biopsy revealed BRCA2 p.Gln3047Ter and p.Gln3047Tyr, with 48.9% and 0.37% allele frequency, respectively. These findings shed light on reversion mutation as a mechanism of resistance to olaparib in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Yamamoto
- Department of Breast and Thyroid SurgeryYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Kei Kawashima
- Department of Breast and Thyroid SurgeryYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Yoshie Fujiwara
- Department of Breast and Thyroid SurgeryYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Shoko Adachi
- Department of Breast and Thyroid SurgeryYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Kazutaka Narui
- Department of Breast and Thyroid SurgeryYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Chiaki Hosaka
- Department of Clinical GeneticsYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Rina Takahashi
- Department of Clinical GeneticsYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Sho Tsuyuki
- Department of Cancer Genome MedicineYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Makoto Sugimori
- Department of Cancer Genome MedicineYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Miki Tanoshima
- Department of Clinical GeneticsYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Mahato Sasamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Masanori Oshi
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Akimitsu Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Chikara Kunisaki
- Department of Cancer Genome MedicineYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wang SSY, Jie YE, Cheng SW, Ling GL, Ming HVY. PARP Inhibitors in Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082357. [PMID: 37190285 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are one of the most successful examples of clinical translation of targeted therapies in medical oncology, and this has been demonstrated by their effective management of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutant cancers, most notably in breast and ovarian cancers. PARP inhibitors target DNA repair pathways that BRCA1/2-mutant tumours are dependent upon. Inhibition of the key components of these pathways leads to DNA damage triggering subsequent critical levels of genomic instability, mitotic catastrophe and cell death. This ultimately results in a synthetic lethal relationship between BRCA1/2 and PARP, which underpins the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors. Despite the early and dramatic response seen with PARP inhibitors, patients receiving them often develop treatment resistance. To date, data from both clinical and preclinical studies have highlighted multiple resistance mechanisms to PARP inhibitors, and only by understanding these mechanisms are we able to overcome the challenges. The focus of this review is to summarise the underlying mechanisms underpinning treatment resistance to PARP inhibitors and to aid both clinicians and scientists to develop better clinically applicable assays to better select patients who would derive the greatest benefit as well as develop new novel/combination treatment strategies to overcome these mechanisms of resistance. With a better understanding of PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms, we would not only be able to identify a subset of patients who are unlikely to benefit from therapy but also to sequence our treatment paradigm to avoid and overcome these resistance mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel S Y Wang
- Medical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| | - Yeo Ee Jie
- Medical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| | - Sim Wey Cheng
- Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| | - Goh Liuh Ling
- Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Identifying tumour microenvironment-related signature that correlates with prognosis and immunotherapy response in breast cancer. Sci Data 2023; 10:119. [PMID: 36869083 PMCID: PMC9984471 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02032-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor microenvironment (TME) plays important roles in prognosis and immune evasion. However, the relationship between TME-related genes and clinical prognosis, immune cell infiltration, and immunotherapy response in breast cancer (BRCA) remains unclear. This study described the TME pattern to construct a TME-related prognosis signature, including risk factors PXDNL, LINC02038 and protective factors SLC27A2, KLRB1, IGHV1-12 and IGKV1OR2-108, as an independent prognostic factor for BRCA. We found that the prognosis signature was negatively correlated with the survival time of BRCA patients, infiltration of immune cells and the expression of immune checkpoints, while positively correlated with tumor mutation burden and adverse treatment effects of immunotherapy. Upregulation of PXDNL and LINC02038 and downregulation of SLC27A2, KLRB1, IGHV1-12 and IGKV1OR2-108 in high-risk score group synergistically contribute to immunosuppressive microenvironment which characterized by immunosuppressive neutrophils, impaired cytotoxic T lymphocytes migration and natural killer cell cytotoxicity. In summary, we identified a TME-related prognostic signature in BRCA, which was connected with immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoints, immunotherapy response and could be developed for immunotherapy targets.
Collapse
|
32
|
Loehr A, Hussain A, Patnaik A, Bryce AH, Castellano D, Font A, Shapiro J, Zhang J, Sautois B, Vogelzang NJ, Chatta G, Courtney K, Harzstark A, Ricci F, Despain D, Watkins S, King C, Nguyen M, Simmons AD, Chowdhury S, Abida W. Emergence of BRCA Reversion Mutations in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Treatment with Rucaparib. Eur Urol 2023; 83:200-209. [PMID: 36243543 PMCID: PMC10398818 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are approved in the USA for the treatment of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutated (BRCA+) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). BRCA reversion mutations are a known mechanism of acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors in multiple cancer types, although their impact and prevalence in mCRPC remain unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine the prevalence of BRCA reversion mutations in the plasma of patients with BRCA+ mCRPC after progression on rucaparib. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Men with BRCA+ mCRPC enrolled in Trial of Rucaparib in Prostate Indications 2 (TRITON2) were treated with rucaparib after progressing on one to two lines of androgen receptor-directed and one taxane-based therapy. Cell-free DNA from the plasma of 100 patients, collected at the end of treatment after confirmed progression before May 5, 2020, was queried for BRCA reversion mutations using next-generation sequencing (NGS). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The association of clinical efficacy and postprogression genomics was measured in 100 patients with BRCA+ mCRPC treated with rucaparib. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS No baseline BRCA reversion mutations were observed in 100 BRCA+ patients. NGS identified somatic BRCA reversion mutations in 39% (39/100) of patients after progression. Reversion rates were similar for BRCA2 and BRCA1, irrespective of germline or somatic status, but higher in samples with a high tumor DNA fraction. Most patients with reversions (74%, 29/39) had two or more reversion mutations occurring subclonally at lower allele frequencies than the original BRCA mutations. The incidence of BRCA reversion mutations increased with the duration of rucaparib treatment. The frequency of reversion mutations was higher in patients with an objective (58%) or a prostate-specific antigen (69%) response compared with those without either (39% and 29%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that BRCA reversion mutations are a significant mechanism of acquired resistance to rucaparib in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC, with evidence of subclonal convergence promoting systemic resistance. PATIENT SUMMARY Men with BRCA mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer enrolled in TRITON2 were treated with rucaparib after progressing on one to two lines of androgen receptor-directed and one taxane-based therapy. Cell-free DNA from the plasma of 100 patients, collected after radiographic or prostate-specific antigen progression before May 5, 2020, was analyzed by next-generation sequencing and queried for BRCA reversion mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Loehr
- Translational Medicine, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Arif Hussain
- Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Akash Patnaik
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alan H Bryce
- Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Albert Font
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jeremy Shapiro
- Medical Oncology, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, VIC, Australia
| | - Jingsong Zhang
- Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brieuc Sautois
- Medical Oncology, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Gurkamal Chatta
- Medical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Courtney
- Hematology/Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Harzstark
- Hematology/Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Program, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Simon Watkins
- Clinical Development, Clovis Oncology UK Ltd, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charmin King
- Clinical Operations, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Minh Nguyen
- Translational Medicine, Clovis Oncology, Inc, Boulder, CO, USA
| | | | - Simon Chowdhury
- Medical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Wassim Abida
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Burdett NL, Willis MO, Alsop K, Hunt AL, Pandey A, Hamilton PT, Abulez T, Liu X, Hoang T, Craig S, Fereday S, Hendley J, Garsed DW, Milne K, Kalaria S, Marshall A, Hood BL, Wilson KN, Conrads KA, Pishas KI, Ananda S, Scott CL, Antill Y, McNally O, Mileshkin L, Hamilton A, Au-Yeung G, Devereux L, Thorne H, Bild A, Bateman NW, Maxwell GL, Chang JT, Conrads TP, Nelson BH, Bowtell DDL, Christie EL. Multiomic analysis of homologous recombination-deficient end-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 2023; 55:437-450. [PMID: 36849657 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01320-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is frequently characterized by homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair deficiency and, while most such tumors are sensitive to initial treatment, acquired resistance is common. We undertook a multiomics approach to interrogate molecular diversity in end-stage disease, using multiple autopsy samples collected from 15 women with HR-deficient HGSC. Patients had polyclonal disease, and several resistance mechanisms were identified within most patients, including reversion mutations and HR restoration by other means. We also observed frequent whole-genome duplication and global changes in immune composition with evidence of immune escape. This analysis highlights diverse evolutionary changes within HGSC that evade therapy and ultimately overwhelm individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki L Burdett
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Kathryn Alsop
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allison L Hunt
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Annandale, Victoria, USA
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ahwan Pandey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Tamara Abulez
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Xuan Liu
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Therese Hoang
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stuart Craig
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katy Milne
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shreena Kalaria
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ashley Marshall
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brian L Hood
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Katlin N Wilson
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kelly A Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kathleen I Pishas
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sumitra Ananda
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Western Health, The University of Melbourne, St Albans, Victoria, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare L Scott
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yoland Antill
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peninsula health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Orla McNally
- The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne Hamilton
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - George Au-Yeung
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Devereux
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Heather Thorne
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrea Bild
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Monrovia, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
- The John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Annandale, Victoria, USA
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey T Chang
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
- The John P. Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brad H Nelson
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David D L Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L Christie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Systemic Therapy for Hereditary Breast Cancers. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:203-224. [PMID: 36435611 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 5% to 10% of all breast cancers are hereditary; many of which are caused by pathogenic variants in genes required for homologous recombination, including BRCA1 and BRCA2. Here we discuss systemic treatment for such breast cancers, including approved chemotherapeutic approaches and also targeted treatment approaches using poly-(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We also discuss experimental approaches to treating hereditary breast cancer, including new small molecule DNA repair inhibitors and also immunomodulatory agents. Finally, we discuss how drug resistance emerges in patients with hereditary breast cancer, how this might be delayed or prevented, and how biomarker-adapted treatment is molding the future management of hereditary breast cancer.
Collapse
|
35
|
Association of location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with benefit from olaparib and bevacizumab maintenance in high-grade ovarian cancer: phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial subgroup exploratory analysis. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:152-162. [PMID: 36564284 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III PAOLA-1 study, the addition of maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) resulted in prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly for homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors, including those with a BRCA mutation (BRCAm). The magnitude of benefit from olaparib and bevacizumab according to the location of mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 remains to be explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced-stage HGOC responding after platinum-based chemotherapy + bevacizumab received maintenance therapy bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w for 15 months) + either olaparib (300 mg b.i.d. for 24 months) or placebo. PFS was analyzed in the subgroup of patients with BRCA1m/BRCA2m according to mutation location in the functional domains of BRCA1 [Really Interesting Gene (RING), DNA-binding domain (DBD), or C-terminal domain of BRCA1 (BRCT)] and BRCA2 [RAD51-binding domain (RAD51-BD); DBD]. RESULTS From 806 randomized patients, 159 harbored BRCA1m (19.7%) and 74 BRCA2m (9.2%). BRCA1m in RING, DBD, and BRCT domains was detected in 18, 40, and 33 patients, and BRCA2m in RAD51-BD and DBD in 36 and 13 patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25.5 months, benefit from maintenance olaparib + bevacizumab was observed irrespective of location of BRCAm. The benefit was particularly high for those with BRCA1m located in the DBD, with 24-month PFS estimated to be 89% and 15% [olaparib + bevacizumab versus placebo + bevacizumab hazard ratio = 0.08 (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.28); interaction P = 0.03]. In BRCA2m patients, 24-month PFS rates for those with mutations located in the DBD were 90% and 100% (olaparib + bevacizumab versus placebo + bevacizumab), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Advanced-stage BRCA-mutated HGOC patients reported PFS benefit from maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab regardless of mutation location. The benefit is particularly high for patients with mutations located in the DBD of BRCA1. Mutations located in the DBD of BRCA2 are also associated with excellent outcome.
Collapse
|
36
|
Shapiro GI, Barry SM. Combining PARP Inhibition and Immunotherapy in BRCA-Associated Cancers. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 186:207-221. [PMID: 37978138 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30065-3_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have significantly improved treatment outcomes of homologous recombination (HR) repair-deficient cancers. While the activity of these agents is largely linked to multiple mechanisms underlying the synthetic lethality of PARP inhibition and HR deficiency, emerging data suggest that their efficacy is also tied to their effects on the immune microenvironment and dependent upon cytotoxic T-cell activation. Effects observed in preclinical models are currently being validated in on-treatment biopsy samples procured from patients enrolled in clinical trials. Although this work has stimulated the development of combinations of PARP inhibitors with immunomodulatory agents, results to date have not demonstrated the superiority of combined PARP inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade compared with PARP inhibition alone. These results have stimulated a more comprehensive assessment of the immunosuppressive components of the tumor microenvironment that must be addressed so that the efficacy of PARP inhibitor agents can be maximized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology and Center for DNA Damage and Repair, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| | - Suzanne M Barry
- Department of Medical Oncology and Center for DNA Damage and Repair, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chan EM, Foster KJ, Bass AJ. WRN Is a Promising Synthetic Lethal Target for Cancers with Microsatellite Instability (MSI). Cancer Treat Res 2023; 186:313-328. [PMID: 37978143 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30065-3_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI), a type of genetic hypermutability arising from impaired DNA mismatch repair (MMR), is observed in approximately 3% of all cancers. Preclinical work has identified the RecQ helicase WRN as a promising synthetic lethal target for patients with MSI cancers. WRN depletion substantially impairs the viability of MSI, but not microsatellite stable (MSS), cells. Experimental evidence suggests that this synthetic lethal phenotype is driven by numerous TA dinucleotide repeats that undergo expansion mutations in the setting of long-standing MMR deficiency. The lengthening of TA repeats increases their propensity to form secondary DNA structures that require WRN to resolve. In the absence of WRN helicase activity, these unresolved DNA secondary structures stall DNA replication forks and induce catastrophic DNA damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmond M Chan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University, New York, USA.
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, USA.
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, USA.
- New York Genome Center, New York, USA.
| | | | - Adam J Bass
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
O'Connor MJ, Forment JV. Mechanisms of PARP Inhibitor Resistance. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 186:25-42. [PMID: 37978129 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30065-3_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) represent the first medicines based on the targeting of the DNA damage response (DDR). PARPi have become standard of care for first-line maintenance treatment in ovarian cancer and have also been approved in other cancer indications including breast, pancreatic and prostate. Despite their efficacy, resistance to PARPi has been reported clinically and represents a growing patient population with unmet clinical need. Here, we describe the various mechanisms of PARPi resistance that have been identified in pre-clinical models and in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J O'Connor
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Discovery Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK.
| | - Josep V Forment
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Discovery Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sorokin M, Rabushko E, Rozenberg JM, Mohammad T, Seryakov A, Sekacheva M, Buzdin A. Clinically relevant fusion oncogenes: detection and practical implications. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221144108. [PMID: 36601633 PMCID: PMC9806411 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221144108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Mechanistically, chimeric genes result from DNA rearrangements and include parts of preexisting normal genes combined at the genomic junction site. Some rearranged genes encode pathological proteins with altered molecular functions. Those which can aberrantly promote carcinogenesis are called fusion oncogenes. Their formation is not a rare event in human cancers, and many of them were documented in numerous study reports and in specific databases. They may have various molecular peculiarities like increased stability of an oncogenic part, self-activation of tyrosine kinase receptor moiety, and altered transcriptional regulation activities. Currently, tens of low molecular mass inhibitors are approved in cancers as the drugs targeting receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) oncogenic fusion proteins, that is, including ALK, ABL, EGFR, FGFR1-3, NTRK1-3, MET, RET, ROS1 moieties. Therein, the presence of the respective RTK fusion in the cancer genome is the diagnostic biomarker for drug prescription. However, identification of such fusion oncogenes is challenging as the breakpoint may arise in multiple sites within the gene, and the exact fusion partner is generally unknown. There is no gold standard method for RTK fusion detection, and many alternative experimental techniques are employed nowadays to solve this issue. Among them, RNA-seq-based methods offer an advantage of unbiased high-throughput analysis of only transcribed RTK fusion genes, and of simultaneous finding both fusion partners in a single RNA-seq read. Here we focus on current knowledge of biology and clinical aspects of RTK fusion genes, related databases, and laboratory detection methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizaveta Rabushko
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology,
Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia,I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical
University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Tharaa Mohammad
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology,
Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| | | | - Marina Sekacheva
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical
University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology,
Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia,I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical
University, Moscow, Russia,Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic
Chemistry, Moscow, Russia,PathoBiology Group, European Organization for
Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Washington CR, Moore KN. Resistance to Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors (PARPi): Mechanisms and Potential to Reverse. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1685-1693. [PMID: 36346509 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01337-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review will focus on the most common mechanisms for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors' (PARPi) resistance and the main strategies for overcoming acquired or de novo PARPi resistance. RECENT FINDINGS Initial approvals for PARPi as part of treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) started in 2014 with patient with recurrent cancer characterized by BRCA mutations in the 3rd and 4th line and now have approvals for front-line maintenance in both the BRCA mutated and BRCAwt populations. As with all therapies, patients will eventually develop resistance to treatment. The most common mechanisms for PARPi resistance include reversion mutations, methylation events, and restoration of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) through combinations and targeting replication stress. As more and more patients receive initial treatment (and potential retreatment with PARPi), we need to better understand the mechanisms in which tumors acquire PARPi resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina R Washington
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma HSC, 800 NE 10th St, Suite 5050, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma HSC, 800 NE 10th St, Suite 5050, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Murciano-Goroff YR, Schram AM, Rosen EY, Won H, Gong Y, Noronha AM, Janjigian YY, Stadler ZK, Chang JC, Yang SR, Mandelker D, Offit K, Berger MF, Donoghue MTA, Bandlamudi C, Drilon A. Reversion mutations in germline BRCA1/2-mutant tumors reveal a BRCA-mediated phenotype in non-canonical histologies. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7182. [PMID: 36418296 PMCID: PMC9684575 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34109-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The association between loss of BRCA1/2 and a homologous recombination deficiency phenotype is lineage dependent. In BRCA-associated cancers such as breast, ovarian, pancreas and prostate, this phenotype confers sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and platinum-therapies. Somatic reversion mutations restoring BRCA1/2 function mediate resistance, and have exclusively been reported in BRCA-associated tumors. In this study, we analyze matched tumor and normal sequencing from 31,927 patients and identify 846 (2.7%) patients with germline BRCA1/2 variants across 43 different cancer types, including 11 with somatic reversion mutations. While nine are in BRCA-associated tumors, we find two reversion mutations in non-BRCA-associated histologies, namely lung and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas. Both were detected following platinum therapy. Whole exome sequencing confirms the homologous recombination deficiency phenotype of these tumors. While reversion mutations arise in all BRCA-associated cancer types, here we show that reversion mutations arising post-platinum in non-BRCA associated histologies, while rare, may indicate BRCA1/2 mediated tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alison M Schram
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ezra Y Rosen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen Won
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- LOXO Oncology at Lilly, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Yixiao Gong
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne Marie Noronha
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Y Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason C Chang
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Soo-Ryum Yang
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark T A Donoghue
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Alexander Drilon
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Baxter JS, Zatreanu D, Pettitt SJ, Lord CJ. Resistance to DNA repair inhibitors in cancer. Mol Oncol 2022; 16:3811-3827. [PMID: 35567571 PMCID: PMC9627783 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) represents a complex network of proteins which detect and repair DNA damage, thereby maintaining the integrity of the genome and preventing the transmission of mutations and rearranged chromosomes to daughter cells. Faults in the DDR are a known driver and hallmark of cancer. Furthermore, inhibition of DDR enzymes can be used to treat the disease. This is exemplified by PARP inhibitors (PARPi) used to treat cancers with defects in the homologous recombination DDR pathway. A series of novel DDR targets are now also under pre-clinical or clinical investigation, including inhibitors of ATR kinase, WRN helicase or the DNA polymerase/helicase Polθ (Pol-Theta). Drug resistance is a common phenomenon that impairs the overall effectiveness of cancer treatments and there is already some understanding of how resistance to PARPi occurs. Here, we discuss how an understanding of PARPi resistance could inform how resistance to new drugs targeting the DDR emerges. We also discuss potential strategies that could limit the impact of these therapy resistance mechanisms in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph S. Baxter
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research CentreThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Diana Zatreanu
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research CentreThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Stephen J. Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research CentreThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Christopher J. Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research CentreThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Multicenter Real-World Data of Subsequent Chemotherapy after Progression to PARP Inhibitors in a Maintenance Relapse Setting. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184414. [PMID: 36139574 PMCID: PMC9497128 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite impressive progression-free survival (PFS) results from PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer, concerns about their effect on post-progression treatment outcomes have recently arisen, particularly when administered in the relapsed setting. Overlapping mechanisms of resistance between PARPi and platinum have been described, and optimal therapies upon progression to PARPi are unknown. We communicate real-world data (RWD) on outcomes of subsequent chemotherapy upon progression to PARPi used as maintenance in ovarian cancer relapses, particularly focusing on platinum rechallenge, according to BRCA status. Methods: Data from high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer patients who received subsequent chemotherapy after progression to maintenance PARPi in the relapsed setting, in 16 Catalan hospitals between August 2016 and April 2021, and who were followed-up until July 2021, were included. Endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), and PFS and overall survival (OS) measured from the subsequent chemotherapy starting date. Results: 111 patients were included [46 (41.4%) presented pathological BRCA1/2 mutations, 8 (7.5%) in other homologous recombination-related genes]. Sixty-four patients (57.7%) had received two prior chemotherapy lines, including the one immediately prior to PARPi. PARPi were niraparib (n = 60, 54.1%), olaparib (n = 49, 44.1%), and rucaparib (n = 2, 1.8%). A total of 81 patients remained platinum-sensitive (PS population) after progression to PARPi (when progression-free interval [PFI] was >6 months after the last cycle of prior platinum) [median PFI 12.0 months (interquartile range, IQR, 8.8−17.1)]. Of those, 74 were treated with subsequent platinum regimens, with the following results: ORR of 41.9%, median PFS (mPFS) of 6.6 months (95% CI 6−9.2), and median OS (mOS) of 20.6 months (95% CI 13.6−28.9). Analysis of these 74 patients according to BRCA status showed that PFIs for BRCA mutant and non BRCA-mutant patients were 13.6 [IQR11.2−22.2] and 10.3 [IQR 7.4−14.9] months, respectively (p = 0.010); ORR were 40.0% versus 43.6%, respectively; Rates of progression (as best response) to subsequent platinum were 45.7% versus 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.004); mPFS and mOS were 3.5 (95% CI 2.5−8.6) versus 7.5 months (95% CI 6.5−10.1, p = 0.03), and 16.4 (95% CI 9.3−27.5) versus 24.2 months (95% CI 17.2−NR, p = 0.036), respectively. Conclusion: This is the largest series of real-world data on ovarian cancer patients retreated with platinum in the post-PARPi scenario, separately analyzing BRCA mutant and non-mutant patients, to our knowledge. In our platinum-sensitive population, rechallenge with platinum after progression upon PARPi in the 3rd or later lines for ovarian cancer relapses shows relevant ORR and similar PFS outcomes to historical series of the prePARPi era. However, BRCA mutant patients presented significantly higher rates of progression under subsequent platinum and worse survival outcomes associated with subsequent platinum than non-BRCA-mutant patients.
Collapse
|
44
|
PARP Inhibitors: Clinical Limitations and Recent Attempts to Overcome Them. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23158412. [PMID: 35955544 PMCID: PMC9369301 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PARP inhibitors are the first clinically approved drugs that were developed based on synthetic lethality. PARP inhibitors have shown promising outcomes since their clinical applications and have recently been approved as maintenance treatment for cancer patients with BRCA mutations. PARP inhibitors also exhibit positive results even in patients without homologous recombination (HR) deficiency. Therapeutic effects were successfully achieved; however, the development of resistance was unavoidable. Approximately 40–70% of patients are likely to develop resistance. Here, we describe the mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitors, the causes of resistance, and the various efforts to overcome resistance. Particularly, we determined the survival probability of cancer patients according to the expression patterns of genes associated with HR restoration, which are critical for the development of PARP inhibitor resistance. Furthermore, we discuss the innovative attempts to degrade PARP proteins by chemically modifying PARP inhibitors. These efforts would enhance the efficacy of PARP inhibitors or expand the scope of their usage.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cammarata G, Barraco N, Giusti I, Gristina V, Dolo V, Taverna S. Extracellular Vesicles-ceRNAs as Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers: Looking into circRNA-miRNA-mRNA Code. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143404. [PMID: 35884464 PMCID: PMC9324482 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with ovarian cancer have a very poor chance of long-term survival, usually due to advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Emerging evidence suggests that extracellular vesicles contain noncoding RNAs such as microRNAs, piwiRNAs, circular RNAs, and long noncoding RNAs, with regulatory effects on ovarian cancer. In this review, we focus on ovarian cancer-associated circular RNA shuttled by extracellular vesicles as mediators of cancer progression and novel biomarkers in liquid biopsy. We propose a circular-RNA–microRNA-mRNA code that can reveal the regulatory network created by extracellular vesicles, noncoding RNAs, and mRNAs in ovarian cancer. Future research in this field will help to identify novel diagnostic biomarkers and druggable therapeutic targets, which will ultimately benefit patients. Abstract Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies in females worldwide. OC is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage due to a lack of specific symptoms and effective screening tests, resulting in a poor prognosis for patients. Age, genetic alterations, and family history are the major risk factors for OC pathogenesis. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying OC progression, identifying new biomarkers for early detection, and discovering potential targets for new drugs are urgent needs. Liquid biopsy (LB), used for cancer detection and management, consists of a minimally invasive approach and practical alternative source to investigate tumor alterations by testing extracellular vesicles (EVs), circulating tumor cells, tumor-educated platelets, and cell-free nucleic acids. EVs are nanosize vesicles shuttling proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, such as DNA, RNA, and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), that can induce phenotypic reprogramming of target cells. EVs are natural intercellular shuttles for ncRNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and circular-RNAs (circRNAs), known to have regulatory effects in OC. Here we focus on the involvement of circRNAs and miRNAs in OC cancer progression. The circRNA-microRNA-mRNA axis has been investigated with Circbank and miRwalk analysis, unraveling the intricate and detailed regulatory network created by EVs, ncRNAs, and mRNAs in OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Cammarata
- Institute of Translational Pharmacology (IFT), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 90146 Palermo, Italy
- Correspondence: (G.C.); (S.T.)
| | - Nadia Barraco
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (N.B.); (V.G.)
| | - Ilaria Giusti
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (I.G.); (V.D.)
| | - Valerio Gristina
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (N.B.); (V.G.)
| | - Vincenza Dolo
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (I.G.); (V.D.)
| | - Simona Taverna
- Institute of Translational Pharmacology (IFT), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 90146 Palermo, Italy
- Correspondence: (G.C.); (S.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wicks AJ, Krastev DB, Pettitt SJ, Tutt ANJ, Lord CJ. Opinion: PARP inhibitors in cancer-what do we still need to know? Open Biol 2022; 12:220118. [PMID: 35892198 PMCID: PMC9326299 DOI: 10.1098/rsob.220118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been demonstrated to exhibit profound anti-tumour activity in individuals whose cancers have a defect in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. Here, we describe the current consensus as to how PARPi work and how drug resistance to these agents emerges. We discuss the need to refine the current repertoire of clinical-grade companion biomarkers to be used with PARPi, so that patient stratification can be improved, the early emergence of drug resistance can be detected and dose-limiting toxicity can be predicted. We also highlight current thoughts about how PARPi resistance might be treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Wicks
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Dragomir B. Krastev
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Stephen J. Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Andrew N. J. Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Christopher J. Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
The Homologous Recombination Deficiency Scar in Advanced Cancer: Agnostic Targeting of Damaged DNA Repair. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122950. [PMID: 35740616 PMCID: PMC9221128 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tumor-suppressor genes are involved in DNA break repair through the homologous recombination system and are widely known for their role in hereditary cancer. Beyond breast and ovarian cancer, prostate and pancreatic cancer also have targetable homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) beyond the well-known BRCA1 and BRCA2 with relevance that exceeds diagnostic purposes. In this review, we aim to summarize the roles of HRD across tumor types and the treatment landscape to guide the targeting of damaged DNA repair based on the cancer’s genetic features. Abstract BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most recognized tumor-suppressor genes involved in double-strand DNA break repair through the homologous recombination (HR) system. Widely known for its role in hereditary cancer, HR deficiency (HRD) has turned out to be critical beyond breast and ovarian cancer: for prostate and pancreatic cancer also. The relevance for the identification of these patients exceeds diagnostic purposes, since results published from clinical trials with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have shown how this type of targeted therapy can modify the long-term evolution of patients with HRD. Somatic aberrations in other HRD pathway genes, but also indirect genomic instability as a sign of this DNA repair impairment (known as HRD scar), have been reported to be relevant events that lead to more frequently than expected HR loss of function in several tumor types, and should therefore be included in the current diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. However, the optimal strategy to identify HRD and potential PARPi responders in cancer remains undefined. In this review, we summarize the role and prevalence of HRD across tumor types and the current treatment landscape to guide the agnostic targeting of damaged DNA repair. We also discuss the challenge of testing patients and provide a special insight for new strategies to select patients who benefit from PARPi due to HRD scarring.
Collapse
|
48
|
Insights into the Possible Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to PARP Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112804. [PMID: 35681784 PMCID: PMC9179506 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The increasingly wide use of PARP inhibitors in breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers harbouring a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 has highlighted the problem of resistance to therapy. This review summarises the complex interactions between PARP1, cell cycle regulation, response to stress replication, homologous recombination, and other DNA damage repair pathways in the setting of BRCA1/2 mutated cancers that could explain the development of primary or secondary resistance to PARP inhibitors. Abstract PARP1 enzyme plays an important role in DNA damage recognition and signalling. PARP inhibitors are approved in breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers harbouring a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2, where PARP1 inhibition results mainly in synthetic lethality in cells with impaired homologous recombination. However, the increasingly wide use of PARP inhibitors in clinical practice has highlighted the problem of resistance to therapy. Several different mechanisms of resistance have been proposed, although only the acquisition of secondary mutations in BRCA1/2 has been clinically proved. The aim of this review is to outline the key molecular findings that could explain the development of primary or secondary resistance to PARP inhibitors, analysing the complex interactions between PARP1, cell cycle regulation, PI3K/AKT signalling, response to stress replication, homologous recombination, and other DNA damage repair pathways in the setting of BRCA1/2 mutated cancers.
Collapse
|
49
|
Hlevnjak M. Tumor genetics and individualized therapy. DIE GYNÄKOLOGIE 2022; 55:424-431. [DOI: 10.1007/s00129-022-04931-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
|
50
|
Leibowitz BD, Dougherty BV, Bell JSK, Kapilivsky J, Michuda J, Sedgewick AJ, Munson WA, Chandra TA, Dry JR, Beaubier N, Igartua C, Taxter T. Validation of genomic and transcriptomic models of homologous recombination deficiency in a real-world pan-cancer cohort. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:587. [PMID: 35643464 PMCID: PMC9148513 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09669-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With the introduction of DNA-damaging therapies into standard of care cancer treatment, there is a growing need for predictive diagnostics assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status across tumor types. Following the strong clinical evidence for the utility of DNA-sequencing-based HRD testing in ovarian cancer, and growing evidence in breast cancer, we present analytical validation of the Tempus HRD-DNA test. We further developed, validated, and explored the Tempus HRD-RNA model, which uses gene expression data from 16,750 RNA-seq samples to predict HRD status from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples across numerous cancer types. Methods Genomic and transcriptomic profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing from Tempus xT, Tempus xO, Tempus xE, Tempus RS, and Tempus RS.v2 assays on 48,843 samples. Samples were labeled based on their BRCA1, BRCA2 and selected Homologous Recombination Repair pathway gene (CDK12, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D) mutational status to train and validate HRD-DNA, a genome-wide loss-of-heterozygosity biomarker, and HRD-RNA, a logistic regression model trained on gene expression. Results In a sample of 2058 breast and 1216 ovarian tumors, BRCA status was predicted by HRD-DNA with F1-scores of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. Across an independent set of 1363 samples across solid tumor types, the HRD-RNA model was predictive of BRCA status in prostate, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer, with F1-scores of 0.88, 0.69, and 0.62, respectively. Conclusions We predict HRD-positive patients across many cancer types and believe both HRD models may generalize to other mechanisms of HRD outside of BRCA loss. HRD-RNA complements DNA-based HRD detection methods, especially for indications with low prevalence of BRCA alterations. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09669-z.
Collapse
|