1
|
Harvey-Jones E, Raghunandan M, Robbez-Masson L, Magraner-Pardo L, Alaguthurai T, Yablonovitch A, Yen J, Xiao H, Brough R, Frankum J, Song F, Yeung J, Savy T, Gulati A, Alexander J, Kemp H, Starling C, Konde A, Marlow R, Cheang M, Proszek P, Hubank M, Cai M, Trendell J, Lu R, Liccardo R, Ravindran N, Llop-Guevara A, Rodriguez O, Balmana J, Lukashchuk N, Dorschner M, Drusbosky L, Roxanis I, Serra V, Haider S, Pettitt SJ, Lord CJ, Tutt ANJ. Longitudinal profiling identifies co-occurring BRCA1/2 reversions, TP53BP1, RIF1 and PAXIP1 mutations in PARP inhibitor-resistant advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:364-380. [PMID: 38244928 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resistance to therapies that target homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer limits their overall effectiveness. Multiple, preclinically validated, mechanisms of resistance have been proposed, but their existence and relative frequency in clinical disease are unclear, as is how to target resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS Longitudinal mutation and methylation profiling of circulating tumour (ct)DNA was carried out in 47 patients with metastatic BRCA1-, BRCA2- or PALB2-mutant breast cancer treated with HRD-targeted therapy who developed progressive disease-18 patients had primary resistance and 29 exhibited response followed by resistance. ctDNA isolated at multiple time points in the patient treatment course (before, on-treatment and at progression) was sequenced using a novel >750-gene intron/exon targeted sequencing panel. Where available, matched tumour biopsies were whole exome and RNA sequenced and also used to assess nuclear RAD51. RESULTS BRCA1/2 reversion mutations were present in 60% of patients and were the most prevalent form of resistance. In 10 cases, reversions were detected in ctDNA before clinical progression. Two new reversion-based mechanisms were identified: (i) intragenic BRCA1/2 deletions with intronic breakpoints; and (ii) intragenic BRCA1/2 secondary mutations that formed novel splice acceptor sites, the latter being confirmed by in vitro minigene reporter assays. When seen before commencing subsequent treatment, reversions were associated with significantly shorter time to progression. Tumours with reversions retained HRD mutational signatures but had functional homologous recombination based on RAD51 status. Although less frequent than reversions, nonreversion mechanisms [loss-of-function (LoF) mutations in TP53BP1, RIF1 or PAXIP1] were evident in patients with acquired resistance and occasionally coexisted with reversions, challenging the notion that singular resistance mechanisms emerge in each patient. CONCLUSIONS These observations map the prevalence of candidate drivers of resistance across time in a clinical setting, information with implications for clinical management and trial design in HRD breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Harvey-Jones
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK; The City of London Cancer Research UK Centre at King's College London, UK
| | - M Raghunandan
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Robbez-Masson
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Magraner-Pardo
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - T Alaguthurai
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | | | - J Yen
- Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, USA
| | - H Xiao
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Brough
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Frankum
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - F Song
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Yeung
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - T Savy
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Gulati
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Alexander
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - H Kemp
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Starling
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Konde
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Marlow
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Cheang
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Proszek
- Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Hubank
- Clinical Genomics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Cai
- Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, USA
| | - J Trendell
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | - R Lu
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | - R Liccardo
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK
| | - N Ravindran
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - O Rodriguez
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Balmana
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - I Roxanis
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - V Serra
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Haider
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S J Pettitt
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - C J Lord
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - A N J Tutt
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK; The City of London Cancer Research UK Centre at King's College London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Natrajan RC, Leonidou A, Brough R, Frankum J, Wai PT, Ng CK, Reis-Filho JS, Lord CJ, Ashworth A. Abstract S4-02: Integrated genomic analyses of members of protein kinase C family identifies subtype specific alterations as novel therapeutic targets. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-s4-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Members of the protein kinase C family are serine/threonine kinases that are involved in proliferation, apoptosis, cell survival and migration, and have been implicated in tumorigenesis. Recently PRKCE has been found to be up-regulated in triple-negative (TN) breast cancers and has been proposed as a target for therapeutic intervention. The aims of this study were to determine i) whether different members of the PKC family are dysregulated and/ or mutated in specific subtypes of breast cancer, ii) to investigate the impact of silencing or overexpression of members of the PKC family in cell line models representative of the different breast cancer subtypes.
Material and methods:
We obtained expression and mutational data from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) project from 567 and 640 samples subjected to microarray-based gene expression profiling and whole exome sequencing, respectively. Pair-wise SAM analysis of TCGA gene expression data was performed to identify differential expression between subgroups (ER+, HER2+ and TN). Potential driver mutations were identified through the algorithm CHASM. Subtype specific dependencies were identified from the re-analysis of publicly available siRNA kinome-wide screens in a panel of 20 breast cancer cell lines. In vitro assessment of gene overexpression was assessed in MCF10A cells by wound healing scratch assays and 3D growth in Matrigel.
Results
PRKCA, B, I and Q were expressed at significantly higher levels in TN breast cancers. Higher expression of PRKCE was significantly associated with ER-negativity, whereas high PRKCD expression was associated with ER-positivity. Analysis of siRNA kinome-wide screen data resulted in a significant reduction in survival associated with PRKCI and PRKCE in ER-negative cells, PRKCQ in triple-negative cells, and PRKCD in ER-positive cells. Furthermore meta-analysis of published exome and whole genome sequencing data identified potentially activating recurrent kinase domain mutations in PRKCB (0.93%), Q (1.25%) and Z (0.93%), with mutations in PRKCZ being associated with higher gene expression. Forced expression of wild-type PRKCQ and PRKCZ in MCF10A cells resulted in the formation of irregular acini in 3D cell culture and expression of wild-type PRKCZ resulted in increased migration.
Conclusions
Differential expression of members of the protein kinase C family, are associated with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Furthermore, we have shown that breast cancer cells are dependent upon expression of these family members in vitro, which are associated with different cellular phenotypes.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr S4-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RC Natrajan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A Leonidou
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - R Brough
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J Frankum
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - PT Wai
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - CK Ng
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - CJ Lord
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - A Ashworth
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shiu KK, Wetterskog D, Mackay A, Natrajan R, Lambros M, Sims D, Bajrami I, Brough R, Frankum J, Sharpe R, Marchio C, Horlings H, Reyal F, van der Vijver M, Turner N, Reis-Filho JS, Lord CJ, Ashworth A. Integrative molecular and functional profiling of ERBB2-amplified breast cancers identifies new genetic dependencies. Oncogene 2013; 33:619-31. [PMID: 23334330 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2012] [Revised: 11/04/2012] [Accepted: 11/14/2012] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Overexpression of the receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB2 (also known as HER2) occurs in around 15% of breast cancers and is driven by amplification of the ERBB2 gene. ERBB2 amplification is a marker of poor prognosis, and although anti-ERBB2-targeted therapies have shown significant clinical benefit, de novo and acquired resistance remains an important problem. Genomic profiling has demonstrated that ERBB2+ve breast cancers are distinguished from ER+ve and 'triple-negative' breast cancers by harbouring not only the ERBB2 amplification on 17q12, but also a number of co-amplified genes on 17q12 and amplification events on other chromosomes. Some of these genes may have important roles in influencing clinical outcome, and could represent genetic dependencies in ERBB2+ve cancers and therefore potential therapeutic targets. Here, we describe an integrated genomic, gene expression and functional analysis to determine whether the genes present within amplicons are critical for the survival of ERBB2+ve breast tumour cells. We show that only a fraction of the ERBB2-amplified breast tumour lines are truly addicted to the ERBB2 oncogene at the mRNA level and display a heterogeneous set of additional genetic dependencies. These include an addiction to the transcription factor gene TFAP2C when it is amplified and overexpressed, suggesting that TFAP2C represents a genetic dependency in some ERBB2+ve breast cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K-K Shiu
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Wetterskog
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Mackay
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Natrajan
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Lambros
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Sims
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - I Bajrami
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Brough
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Frankum
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Sharpe
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Marchio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - H Horlings
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Reyal
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M van der Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Turner
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C J Lord
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Ashworth
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|