Inflammation reduces the effect of nutritional therapy on clinical outcomes in cancer patients

Comparison of the inflammatory biomarkers IL- 6, TNF-α, and CRP to predict the effect of nutritional therapy on mortality in medical patients at risk of malnutrition : A secondary analysis of the randomized clinical trial EFFORT

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is a key driver of disease-related malnutrition and patients with high inflammation may not show the same benefits from nutritional therapy as other patients. We compared in an exploratory manner the prognostic ability of interleukin- 6 (IL- 6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to predict outcome and response to nutritional therapy, respectively, within a large cohort of patients from a previous nutritional trial.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the Swiss-wide, multicenter, randomized controlled Effect of early nutritional therapy on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and Recovery of malnourished medical inpatients Trial (EFFORT) trial comparing individualized nutritional support with usual care nutrition in medical inpatients. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We included 996 patients with an overall mortality rate of 6% within 30 days. Compared to patients with low IL- 6 level < 11.2pg/mL, patients with high levels had a more than 3-fold increase in mortality at 30-days (adjusted HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.95-6.28, p < 0.001), but tended to have a less pronounced mortality benefit from individualized nutritional therapy as compared to usual nutritional care (hazard ratio 0.82 vs. 0.32). CRP and TNF-α were not associated with mortality, but patients with increased CRP levels > 100 mg/dl also showed a trend towards a diminished response to nutritional intervention (hazard ratio 1.25 vs. 0.47).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the thesis that a high inflammatory state is linked to reduced benefits from nutritional therapy. Apparently, CRP and IL- 6 effectively predict treatment response, but IL- 6 may additionally serve as a prognostic marker for increased mortality. This finding might help to develop improved treatment strategies for patients with elevated inflammatory profiles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02517476 (registered 7 August 2015).

Organization of nutritional care

The increasingly complex health care systems, the large and diverse population to whom nutritional therapy is addressed, and the need of specialized health care professionals implies an organizational strategy to be defined. The organization of nutritional care is a fundamental strategy to promote an optimal, quality and safety nutritional therapy. This is why, the organization of nutritional care should be based on 4 principles, including: Nutritional care should be considered as a process, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to a good nutritional care, the economic approach and the patient centered approach are essential to the organization of nutritional care. In this paper we will address the organization of nutritional care and its 4 principles.

Nutritional aspects in neuroendocrine neoplasms. bridging the gap between dietary interventions and cancer care strategies: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent heterogeneous tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells in different organs. Despite growing interest in the nutritional aspects of NEN management, research in this area is limited. Aim of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge, highlight research gaps, and underscore the significance of nutrition in the comprehensive care of NEN patients.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive bibliographic search focusing on studies (including retrospective and prospective studies, systematic reviews, case series, and guidelines) exploring the relationship between nutritional assessments, dietary interventions, micronutrient deficiencies, and their impact on NEN outcomes.

RESULTS

Significant gaps exist in current research, particularly in understanding the specific nutritional needs of NEN patients and how tailored nutritional interventions can improve clinical outcomes. Evidence suggests that a high-fat Western diet may promote the growth of NEN, while a Mediterranean diet may help lower insulin levels and strengthen the immune system, potentially preventing tumor development. The ketogenic diet and intermittent fasting may also have positive impacts. Addressing common micronutrient deficiencies, such as vitamin D and niacin, is crucial to mitigate disease progression. There's a crucial need for future studies to include a comprehensive nutritional assessment incorporating patient-reported outcomes, to fully capture the impact of nutritional strategies.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional management, an important but under-researched facet of NEN treatment, significantly improves patients' quality of life and survival. Integrating nutrition into personalized cancer care is essential, highlighting the role of nutritional strategies in optimizing patient outcomes.

Perioperative and post-hospital whole-course nutrition management in patients with pancreatoduodenectomy - a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Whole-course nutrition management (WNM) has been proven to improve outcomes and reduce complications. We conducted this randomized controlled trial to validate its effectiveness in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

From 1 December 2020, to 30 November 2023, this single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery in a major hospital in Beijing, China. Participants who were undergoing PD were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the WNM group or the control group. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications. Subgroup analysis in patients who were at nutritional risk was performed. Finally, a 6-month follow-up was conducted and the economic benefit was evaluated using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) into the WNM group and the control group. The incidences of total complications (47.6% vs. 69.0%, P =0.046), total infections (14.3% vs. 33.3%, P =0.040), and abdominal infection (11.9% vs. 31.0%, P =0.033) were significantly lower in the WNM group. In the subgroup analysis of patients at nutritional risk, 66 cases were included (35 cases in the WNM group and 31 cases in the control group). The rate of abdominal infection (11.4% vs. 32.3%, P =0.039) and postoperative length of stay (23.1±10.3 vs. 30.4±17.2, P =0.046) were statistically different between the two subgroups. In the 6-month follow-up, more patients reached the energy target in the WNM group (97.0% vs. 79.4%, P =0.049) and got a higher daily energy intake (1761.3±339.5 vs. 1599.6±321.5, P =0.045). The ICER suggested that WNM saved 31 511 Chinese Yuan (CNY) while reducing the rate of total infections by 1% in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and saved 117 490 CNY in patients at nutritional risk, while WNM saved 31 511 CNY while reducing the rate of abdominal infections by 1% in the ITT population and saved 101 359 CNY in patients at nutritional risk.

CONCLUSION

In this trial, whole-course nutrition management was associated with fewer total postoperative complications, total and abdominal infections, and was cost-effective, especially in patients at nutritional risk. It seems to be a favorable strategy for patients undergoing PD.

The relationship between LDH and GLIM criteria for cancer cachexia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cancer cachexia is a clinical condition characterized by recognizable "sickness behaviors" accompanied by loss of lean body tissue. The Global Leadership on Malnutrition (GLIM) has proposed phenotypic (unintentional weight loss, low body mass index and low muscle mass) and aetiologic (reduced food intake and inflammation or disease burden) diagnostic criteria. Recent work has suggested serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) might represent a 3rd aetiologic criteria. Little is known of its relationship with GLIM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of their comparative prognostic value and association was performed.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane) up to February 2023 was used to identify studies that compared the prognostic value of LDH and components of the GLIM criteria in cancer. An analysis of the relationship between LDH and the components of GLIM was undertaken where this data was available. RevMan 5.4.1 was used to perform a meta-analysis for each diagnostic criteria that had 3 or more studies which reported hazard ratios with a 95 per cent confidence interval for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 119 studies were reviewed. Advanced lung cancer was the most studied population. Included in the meta-analysis were 6 studies (n=2165) on LDH and weight loss, 17 studies (n=7540) on LDH and low BMI, 5 studies (n=758) on LDH and low muscle mass, 0 studies on LDH and food intake and 93 studies (n=32,190) on LDH and inflammation. There was a significant association between elevated serum LDH and each of low BMI (OR 1.39, 1.09 - 1.77; p=0.008), elevated NLR (OR 2.04, 1.57 - 2.65; p<0.00001) and elevated CRP (OR 2.58, 1.81 - 3.67; p<0.00001). There was no association between elevated serum LDH and low muscle mass. Only one study presented data on the association between LDH and unintentional weight loss. Elevated LDH showed a comparative OS (HR 1.86, 1.57 - 2.07; p<0.00001) to unintentional weight loss (HR 1.57, 1.23 - 1.99; p=0.0002) and had a similar OS (HR 2.00, 1.70 - 2.34; p<0.00001) to low BMI (HR 1.57, 1.29-2.90; p<0.0001). LDH also showed an OS (HR 2.25, 1.76 - 2.87; p<0.00001) congruous with low muscle mass (HR 1.93, 1.14 - 3.27; p=0.01) and again, LDH conferred as poor an OS (HR 1.77, 1.64-1.90; p<0.00001) as elevated NLR (HR 1.61, 1.48 - 1.77; p<0.00001) or CRP (HR 1.55, 1.43 - 1.69; p<0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Current literature suggests elevated serum LDH is associated with inflammation in cancer (an aetiologic GLIM criterion), however more work is required to establish the relationship between LDH and the phenotypic components of GLIM. Additionally, elevated serum LDH appears to be a comparative prognosticator of overall survival in cancer when compared to the GLIM criteria.

Evolving concepts on perioperative nutrition of sarcopenic cancer patients

The recent recognition of the association of sarcopenia with an increased risk of complications after a surgical procedure calls for rethinking the proper approach of the perioperative care in cancer patients. Sarcopenia is broadly considered in literature according to three different definitions: loss of muscle mass, loss of muscle mass plus reduced muscle function and myosteatosis. The aim of this short review on this issue is to define the excess of risk by type of primary and of surgical procedure, depending on the definition of sarcopenia, to speculate on this association (casual versus causal) and to examine the current therapeutical approaches. The analysis of the data shows that sarcopenia, defined as loss of muscle mass plus reduced muscle function, has the higher predictive power for the occurrence of postoperative complications than the two other definitions, and any definition of sarcopenia works better than the usual indexes or scores of surgical risk. Our analysis supports the concept that: a) sarcopenia is frequently associated with inflammation, but inflammation cannot be considered the only or the absolute cause for sarcopenia, b) sarcopenia is not a simple marker of risk but can have a direct role in the increase of risk. Data on perioperative care of sarcopenic cancer patients are scanty but a correct approach cannot rely on nutritional support alone but on a combined approach of optimized nutrition and exercise, hopefully associated with an anti-inflammatory treatment. This strategy should be applied proactively in keeping with the recent recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology for the medical treatment of advanced cancer patients even if a clear demonstration of effectiveness is still lacking.

ESPEN practical guideline: Nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients

BACKGROUND

Disease-related malnutrition in polymorbid medical inpatients is a highly prevalent syndrome associated with significantly increased morbidity, disability, short- and long-term mortality, impaired recovery from illness, and healthcare costs.

AIM

As there are uncertainties in applying disease-specific guidelines to patients with multiple conditions, our aim was to provide evidence-based recommendations on nutritional support for the polymorbid patient population hospitalized in medical wards.

METHODS

The 2023 update adheres to the standard operating procedures for ESPEN guidelines. We undertook a systematic literature search for 15 clinical questions in three different databases (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library), as well as in secondary sources (e.g., published guidelines), until July 12th, 2022. Retrieved abstracts were screened to identify relevant studies that were used to develop recommendations (including SIGN grading), which was followed by submission to Delphi voting. Here, the practical version of the guideline is presented which has been shortened and equipped with flow charts for patients care.

RESULTS

32 recommendations (7× A, 11× B, 10× O and 4× GPP), which encompass different aspects of nutritional support were included from the scientific guideline including indication, route of feeding, energy and protein requirements, micronutrient requirements, disease-specific nutrients, timing, monitoring and procedure of intervention. Here, the practical version of the guideline is presented which has been shortened and equipped with flow charts for patients care.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent high-quality trials have provided increasing evidence that nutritional support can reduce morbidity and other complications associated with malnutrition in polymorbid patients. The timely screening of patients for risk of malnutrition at hospital admission followed by individualized nutritional support interventions for at-risk patients should be part of routine clinical care and multimodal treatment in hospitals worldwide. Use of this updated practical guideline offers an evidence-based nutritional approach to polymorbid medical inpatients and may improve their outcomes.

Inflammation and response to nutrition interventions

The complex interplay between nutrition and inflammation has become a major focus of research in recent years across different clinical settings and patient populations. Inflammation has been identified as a key driver for disease-related malnutrition promoting anorexia, reduced food intake, muscle loss, and on a cellular level, insulin resistance, which together stimulate catabolism. However, these effects may well be bidirectional, and there is strong evidence showing that nutrition influences inflammation. Several single nutrients and dietary patterns with either proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory properties have been studied, such as the long-chain ω-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid. The Mediterranean diet combines several such nutrients and has been shown to improve medical outcomes in the outpatient setting. In addition, there is increasing evidence suggesting that inflammation affects the metabolism and modulates the response to nutrition support interventions. In fact, recent studies from the medical inpatient setting suggest that inflammation, mirrored by high levels of C-reactive protein, diminishes the positive effects of nutrition support. This may explain the lack of positive effects of some nutrition trials in severely ill patients, whereas similar approaches to nutritional support have shown positive results in less severely ill patients. The use of biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein, may help to identify patients with a lower response to nutrition, in whom other treatment options need to be used. There is need for additional research to understand how to best address the malnourished patient with inflammation by specifically lowering inflammation through anti-inflammatory medical treatments and/or nutrition interventions.

ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients

BACKGROUND

Disease-related malnutrition in polymorbid medical inpatients is a highly prevalent syndrome associated with significantly increased morbidity, disability, short- and long-term mortality, impaired recovery from illness, and cost of care.

AIM

As there are uncertainties in applying disease-specific guidelines to patients with multiple conditions, our aim was to provide evidence-based recommendations on nutritional support for the polymorbid patient population hospitalized in medical wards.

METHODS

This update adheres to the standard operating procedures for ESPEN guidelines. We did a systematic literature search for 15 clinical questions in three different databases (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library), as well as in secondary sources (e.g. published guidelines), until July 12th. Retrieved abstracts were screened to identify relevant studies that were used to develop recommendations (incl. SIGN grading), which was followed by submission to Delphi voting.

RESULTS

From a total of 3527 retrieved abstracts, 60 new relevant studies were analyzed and used to generate a guideline draft that proposed 32 recommendations (7x A, 11x B, 10x O and 4x GPP), which encompass different aspects of nutritional support including indication, route of feeding, energy and protein requirements, micronutrient requirements, disease-specific nutrients, timing, monitoring and procedure of intervention. The results of the first online voting showed a strong consensus (agreement of >90%) on 100% of the recommendations. Therefore, no final consensus conference was needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent high-quality trials have provided increasing evidence that nutritional support can reduce morbidity and other complications associated with malnutrition in polymorbid patients. The timely screening of patients for risk of malnutrition at hospital admission followed by individualized nutritional support interventions for at-risk patients should be part of routine clinical care and multimodal treatment in hospitals worldwide. Use of this updated guideline offers an evidence-based nutritional approach to the polymorbid medical inpatients and may improve their outcomes.

Disease-related malnutrition with inflammation and cachexia

In 2010, the definition of cachexia was jointly developed by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) Special Interest Groups (SIG) "Cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases" and "Nutrition in geriatrics". Cachexia was considered as a synonym of disease-related malnutrition (DRM) with inflammation by the ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Starting from these concepts and taking into account the available evidence the SIG "Cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases" conducted several meetings throughout 2020-2022 to discuss the similarities and differences between cachexia and DRM, the role of inflammation in DRM, and how it can be assessed. Moreover, in line with the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework, in the future the SIG proposes to develop a prediction score to quantify the individual and combined effect(s) of multiple muscle and fat catabolic mechanisms, reduced food intake or assimilation and inflammation, which variably contribute to the cachectic/malnourished phenotype. This DRM/cachexia risk prediction score could consider the factors related to the direct mechanisms of muscle catabolism separately from those related to the reduction of nutrient intake and assimilation. Novel perspectives in the field of DRM with inflammation and cachexia were identified and described in the report.

Association between prealbumin, all-cause mortality, and response to nutrition treatment in patients at nutrition risk: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Because of the shorter half-life as compared with albumin, serum prealbumin concentrations have been proposed to be useful nutrition biomarkers for the assessment of patients at nutrition risk. In a post hoc analysis of patients at nutrition risk from a randomized controlled nutrition trial, we tested the hypothesis that (1) prealbumin is associated with higher all-cause 180-day mortality rates and that (2) individualized nutrition support compared with usual-care nutrition more effectively improves survival at 30 days in patients with low prealbumin levels compared with patients with normal prealbumin levels.

METHODS

We performed a prespecified cohort study in patients included in the pragmatic, Swiss, multicenter randomized controlled EFFORT trial comparing the effects of individualized nutrition support with usual care. We studied low prealbumin concentrations (<0.17 g/L) in a subgroup of 517 patients from one participating center.

RESULTS

A total of 306 (59.2%) patients (mean age 71.9 years, 53.6% men) had low admission prealbumin levels (<0.17 g/L). There was a significant association between low prealbumin levels and mortality at 180 days (115/306 [37.6%] vs 47/211 [22.3%], fully adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.28; P = 0.011). Prealbumin levels significantly improved the prognostic value of the Nutritional Risk Screening total score regarding mortality prediction at short- and long-term. The difference in mortality between patients receiving individualized nutrition support and usual-care nutrition was similar for patients with low prealbumin levels compared with patients with normal prealbumin levels (HR=0.90 [95% CI=0.51-1.59] vs HR=0.88 [95% CI=0.35-2.23]) with no evidence for interaction (P = 0.823).

CONCLUSION

Among medical inpatients at nutrition risk, low admission prealbumin levels correlated with different nutrition markers and higher mortality risk, but patients with low or high prealbumin levels had a similar benefit from nutrition support. Further studies should identify nutrition markers that help further personalize nutrition interventions.

Inflammation and Nutrition: Friend or Foe?

The importance of the interplay between inflammation and nutrition has generated much interest in recent times. Inflammation has been identified as a key driver for disease-related malnutrition, leading to anorexia, reduced food intake, muscle catabolism, and insulin resistance, which are stimulating a catabolic state. Interesting recent data suggest that inflammation also modulates the response to nutritional treatment. Studies have demonstrated that patients with high inflammation show no response to nutritional interventions, while patients with lower levels of inflammation do. This may explain the contradictory results of nutritional trials to date. Several studies of heterogeneous patient populations, or in the critically ill or advanced cancer patients, have not found significant benefits on clinical outcome. Vice versa, several dietary patterns and nutrients with pro- or anti-inflammatory properties have been identified, demonstrating that nutrition influences inflammation. Within this review, we summarize and discuss recent advances in both the role of inflammation in malnutrition and the effect of nutrition on inflammation.

Low T3 syndrome upon admission and response to nutritional support in malnourished medical inpatients

INTRODUCTION

During illness, deiodination of thyroxine (T4) to triiodothyronine (T3) is down regulated. This is called "low T3 syndrome", an adaptive metabolic mechanism to reduce energy expenditure and prevent catabolism. We investigated the prognostic role of low T3 syndrome in patients at nutritional risk regarding mortality, clinical outcomes and response to nutritional support.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the Effect of Early Nutritional Support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and Recovery of Malnourished Medical Inpatients Trial (EFFORT), a randomized-controlled Swiss multicenter trial comparing effects of individualized nutritional support with usual care in adult medical inpatients at nutritional risk. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality over 30-,180-days and 5-years.

RESULTS

We had complete data including fT3 concentration of 801/2028 (39.5%) patients from the initial trial. Of these 492 (61.4%) had low T3 syndrome (fT3 < 3.2 pmol/l). Low T3 syndrome was associated with higher mortality over 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio 1.97 [95%CI 1.17 to 3.31], p 0.011) and other adverse clinical outcomes. Nutritional support only lowered mortality in the group of patients with but not in those without low T3 syndrome (adjusted odds ratio of nutritional support of 0.82 [95%CI 0.47 to 1.41] vs. 1.47 [95%CI 0.55 to 3.94]). This finding, however, was not significant in interaction analysis (p for interaction = 0.401).

CONCLUSIONS

Our secondary analysis of a randomized trial suggests that medical inpatients at nutritional risk with low T3 syndrome have a substantial increase in mortality and may show a more pronounced beneficial response to nutritional support interventions.

Handgrip Strength Values Depend on Tumor Entity and Predict 180-Day Mortality in Malnourished Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related malnutrition is a prevalent condition associated with a loss of muscle mass and impaired functional status, leading to immunodeficiency, impaired quality of life and adverse clinical outcomes. Handgrip strength (HGS) is a practical measure to assess muscle strength in individual patients during clinical practice. However, HGS reference values refer to populations of healthy people, and population-specific values, such as those in the population of cancer patients, still need to be defined.

METHODS

Within a secondary analysis of a previous randomized controlled nutritional trial focusing on hospitalized cancer patients at risk for malnutrition, we investigated sex-specific HGS values stratified by age and tumor entity. Additionally, we examined the association between HGS and 180-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We included data from 628 cancer patients, which were collected from eight hospitals in Switzerland. Depending on the age of patients, HGS varied among female patients from 7 kg to 26 kg and among male patients from 20.5 kg to 44 kg. An incremental decrease in handgrip strength by 10 kg resulted in a 50% increase in 180-day all-cause mortality (odds ratio 1.52 (95%CI 1.19 to 1.94), p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data provide evidence of the prognostic implications of HGS measurement in cancer patients and validate the prognostic value of handgrip strength in regard to long-term mortality. In addition, our results provide expected HGS values in the population of hospitalized malnourished cancer patients, which may allow better interpretation of values in individual patients.

Modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) is correlated with sarcopenia and dominates the prognostic role of baseline body composition parameters in advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer patients undergoing first-line treatment from the phase III EXPAND trial

PURPOSE

Sarcopenia represents an established adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients. Consequently, different means to counteract sarcopenia have been proposed to improve cancer treatment. Computed tomography (CT) based measurements, also labor intensive, are well validated for the analysis of sarcopenia. As inflammation plays a key role in the development of sarcopenia, we here studied the role of the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), consisting of inflammation parameters plasma C-reactive protein and albumin, to predicting sarcopenia and adipose tissue related body composition (BC) parameters at baseline and their changes during treatment and to analyze its prognostic role in conjunction with BC parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CT measurements of body composition parameters were performed at baseline and week 12 in patients with advanced gastric or esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) cancer from the phase III EXPAND trial, undergoing first-line platinum-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. mGPS was calculated from baseline CRP and albumin plasma levels. Pearson correlation and Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

mGPS is strongly prognostic for overall survival (OS). Baseline mGPS is significantly correlated with baseline mean muscle attenuation (MA), P<0.0001. Baseline mGPS did not predict a decline in muscle or adipose tissue parameters during 12 weeks of treatment and a decline in muscle or adipose tissue parameters was not prognostic for OS. MA lost its prognostic role for OS when mGPS or CRP was entered into the COX models. ECOG performance status together with CRP or mGPS remained as sole baseline prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support a model where tumor-mediated inflammatory response represents a strong prognostic factor, which is causally related to sarcopenia, but with no direct causal path from sarcopenia to survival. Therefore, therapeutic targeting of systemic inflammation should be further explored as a promising strategy to improve both sarcopenia and the efficacy and tolerability of cancer treatment.

Current Screening Methods for the Risk or Presence of Malnutrition in Cancer Patients

Malnutrition is highly common among cancer patients and is associated with a poor quality of life, increased treatment toxicities and decreased survival. The screening of malnutrition should be performed in an early stage of cancer disease and should be rapid, not expensive and highly sensitive to identify the risk of developing malnutrition. Importantly, international clinical guidelines suggest to perform screening for malnutrition in all cancer patients and if the risk is present, they recommend to perform a full nutritional assessment. During the screening phase, different nutritional parameters are considered including the loss of appetite, low food intake, body weight loss and burden of the disease. These items are present in several screening tools, such as the Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS)-2002, the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) which represent the most widely used tools to screen for an altered nutritional status in cancer patients. Recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) developed an assessment tool for the diagnosis of malnutrition taking into account the presence of i) involuntary body weight loss, ii) body mass index, iii) low muscle mass, iv) low food intake and disease burden/inflammation; in particular, body weight loss, decreased body mass index (BMI), and low muscle mass are considered as phenotypic criteria, whereas reduced food intake, disease burden and inflammation are defined as etiologic criteria. To perform the diagnosis of malnutrition, GLIM consensus considered the presence of at least one phenotypic and one etiologic criterion. The above-mentioned screening tools were validated in different clinical settings and suggesting the use of one tool vs another is challenging considering, among others, different factors including the type and stage of cancer and the setting (i.e., inpatient or outpatient care). Recent data obtained among large cohorts of cancer patients indicate that personalized nutritional therapy reduced mortality risk and ameliorated quality of life and functionality among cancer patients with high nutritional risk, supporting the urgent need for implementing screening and diagnosis of malnutrition in this context.