1
|
Franchella S, Concheri S, Di Pasquale Fiasca VM, Brotto D, Sorrentino F, Ortolani C, Agostinelli A, Montino S, Gregori D, Lorenzoni G, Borghini C, Trevisi P, Marioni G, Zanoletti E. Bilateral simultaneous cochlear implants in children: Best timing of surgery and long-term auditory outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104124. [PMID: 38035465 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluate the hearing outcomes of bilateral deaf children implanted simultaneously and define the most appropriate timing for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Audiological CI results were retrieved in both the short-term and long-term period and compared by stratifying the patients into different subcohorts according to their age at surgery. Additional data collected were age at implant activation, etiology and timing of onset of deafness, presence of psychomotor delay. RESULTS fifty-six bilaterally implanted children were included. The short-term outcomes differed significantly when comparing groups of different ages at implantation: younger patients achieved better aided pure tone audiometry results. Considering long-term follow-up, a significant correlation was identified between an early age at implantation and the hearing outcome at ages 2 to 5 years. Perceptive levels were better at 4 years of age in the younger group. No significant differences were found between children implanted at before 12 months and between 12 and 16 months of age. CONCLUSIONS The results of the analyzed follow-up data support the hypothesis that children implanted at before 24 months are expected to have better hearing performances. Nevertheless, these results are referred to a widely heterogeneous group of patients and the duration of auditory deprivation should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Franchella
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Stefano Concheri
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Davide Brotto
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorrentino
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Caterina Ortolani
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Anna Agostinelli
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Silvia Montino
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Dario Gregori
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Lorenzoni
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Carlotta Borghini
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, via Loredan, 18, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Patrizia Trevisi
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gino Marioni
- Phoniatrics and Audiology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy.
| | - Elisabetta Zanoletti
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuzzuol BR, Apolonio JS, da Silva Júnior RT, de Carvalho LS, Santos LKDS, Malheiro LH, Silva Luz M, Calmon MS, Crivellaro HDL, Lemos FFB, Freire de Melo F. Usher syndrome: Genetic diagnosis and current therapeutic approaches. World J Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 11:1-17. [DOI: 10.5319/wjo.v11.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Usher Syndrome (USH) is the most common deaf-blind syndrome, affecting approximately 1 in 6000 people in the deaf population. This genetic condition is characterized by a combination of hearing loss (HL), retinitis pigmentosa, and, in some cases, vestibular areflexia. Among the subtypes of USH, USH type 1 is considered the most severe form, presenting profound bilateral congenital deafness, vestibular areflexia, and early onset RP. USH type 2 is the most common form, exhibiting congenital moderate to severe HL for low frequencies and severe to profound HL for high frequencies. Conversely, type 3 is the rarest, initially manifesting mild symptoms during childhood that become more prominent in the first decades of life. The dual impact of USH on both visual and auditory senses significantly impairs patients’ quality of life, restricting their daily activities and interactions with society. To date, 9 genes have been confirmed so far for USH: MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15, USH1G, USH2A, ADGRV1, WHRN and CLRN1. These genes are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner and encode proteins expressed in the inner ear and retina, leading to functional loss. Although non-genetic methods can assist in patient triage and disease extension evaluation, genetic and molecular tests play a pivotal role in providing genetic counseling, enabling appropriate gene therapy, and facilitating timely cochlear implantation (CI). The CRISPR/Cas9 system and viral-based gene replacement therapy have recently emerged as highly promising techniques for treating USH. Regarding drug therapy, PTC-124 and Nb54 have been identified as promising drug interventions for genetic HL in USH. Simultaneously, CI has proven to be critical in the restoration of hearing. This review aims to summarize the genetic and molecular diagnosis of USH and highlight the importance of early diagnosis in guiding appropriate treatment strategies and improving patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Rocha Cuzzuol
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Jonathan Santos Apolonio
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Lorena Sousa de Carvalho
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Luana Kauany de Sá Santos
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Luciano Hasimoto Malheiro
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Marcel Silva Luz
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Mariana Santos Calmon
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Henrique de Lima Crivellaro
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Fabian Fellipe Bueno Lemos
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Fabrício Freire de Melo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coudert A, Parodi M, Denoyelle F, Maudoux A, Loundon N, Simon F. Paediatric vestibular assessment in French cochlear implant centres: Challenges and improvement areas. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 171:111651. [PMID: 37454475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Survey of paediatric vestibular activity in all 30 French paediatric cochlear implant (CI) centres to identify challenges and areas of improvement. METHOD All 30 French CI centres answered a 29-question questionnaire about their paediatric vestibular activity, equipment, and management in different clinical situations (e.g. vestibular assessment before a cochlear implantation or in cases of vertigo) at different ages. RESULTS Eighteen CI centres had dedicated paediatric vestibular clinics and 12 did not. Minimum age required for vestibular testing was 3 years in eight centres. Four vestibular tests stood out: caloric tests, video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), rotating chair, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). Depending on the centre's experience, the use of vestibular tests in clinical routine was very heterogeneous. Expert centres mostly used vHIT and cervical VEMP (in bone conduction) for assessments before the first cochlear implantation in 1-year-old children. Dizziness assessment in 4-year children was based on the use of vHIT, cervical VEMP on bone conduction, rotatory test, and caloric test. Ocular VEMP was rarely used. CONCLUSIONS Paediatric vestibular assessment requires specific expertise compared to adults. Due to a lack of specialised human resources, some centres may be unable to follow French paediatric CI guidelines. International recommendations could help standardise paediatric vestibular management and public health policies should be discussed to improve training and access for children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Coudert
- Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Femme Mere Enfant Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
| | - M Parodi
- Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015, Paris, France
| | - F Denoyelle
- Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, F-75006, Paris, France
| | - A Maudoux
- Université Paris Cité, F-75006, Paris, France; Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, AP-HP, Robert-Debré Hospital, Paris, France
| | - N Loundon
- Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015, Paris, France
| | - F Simon
- Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75015, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, F-75006, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Forli F, Bruschini L, Franciosi B, Berrettini S, Lazzerini F. Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: long-term speech perception results in children first implanted at an early age. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:1073-1080. [PMID: 35920894 PMCID: PMC9899753 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07568-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aims to assess the benefit of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with congenital bilateral profound hearing loss, submitted to the first implant at an early age. METHODS We enrolled all the bilateral sequential cochlear implanted children who received the first implant within 48 months and the second within 12 years of age at our Institution. The children were submitted to disyllabic word recognition tests and Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) assessment using the OLSA matrix sentence test with the first implanted device (CI1), with the second implanted device (CI2), and with both devices (CIbil). Furthermore, we measured the datalogging of both devices. Then we calculated the binaural SRT gain (b-SRTgain) and checked the correlations between speech perception results and the b-SRTgain with the child's age at CI1 and CI2, DELTA and the datalogging reports. RESULTS With the bilateral electric stimulation, we found a significant improvement in disyllabic word recognition scores and in SRT. Moreover, the datalogging showed no significant differences in the time of use of CI1 and CI2. We found significant negative correlations between speech perception abilities with CI2 and age at CI2 and DELTA, and between the SRT with CI1 and the b-SRTgain. CONCLUSIONS From this study we can conclude that in a sequential CI procedure, even if a short inter-implant delay and lower ages at the second surgery can lead to better speech perception with CI2, children can benefit from bilateral stimulation independently of age at the second surgery and the DELTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Forli
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy.
| | - L Bruschini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy
| | - B Franciosi
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Berrettini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Lazzerini
- Otolaryngology, Audiology and Phoniatrics Unit, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen Y, Li Y, Jia H, Gu W, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Xue M, Li J, Shi W, Jiang L, Yang L, Sterkers O, Wu H. Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Very Young Children Improves Adaptability and Social Skills: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ear Hear 2023; 44:254-263. [PMID: 36126187 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the value of using the Gesell Development Diagnosis Scale (GDDS) to predict developmental outcomes in very young children who undergo simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation. DESIGN In this prospective cohort study, a repeated-measures investigation was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital. A total of 62 children receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantations were enrolled from April 2017 to August 2018. They were divided into 2 groups depending on the operative age: "Infants" group (6 to 12 months, N = 38) or "Children" group (12 to 36 months, N = 24). Data on the surgical outcomes, auditory development, speech production, and developmental indicators were collected until 2 years after the initial fitting. The primary outcome measure was the GDDS, a neuropsychological development examination. Secondary outcomes included the following: complication rate, aided pure-tone average, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Categories of Auditory Performance-II, Meaningful Use of Speech Scale, Speech Intelligibility Rating, and the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire. RESULTS The mean ages at implantation in infants and children groups were 9.2 ± 1.17 and 16.6 ± 3.60 months, respectively. Significant differences were found in the social skills ( p = 0.001) and adaptability ( p = 0.031) domains of GDDS. The younger the age of bilateral cochlear implants surgery, the higher developmental quotient of language, social skills, and adaptability the child could achieve after 2 years. The complication rates in the infants and children groups were 0% versus 2.1% ( p = 0.57). There was no surgical complication in the infants group. In the children group, 1 case with enlarged vestibular aqueduct and Mondini malformation had a receiver-implant misplacement on the right side (2%, 1/48). In the two groups, auditory performance and speech production had improved similarly. In the infants group, social skills developmental quotient at baseline had a significant positive relationship with Meaningful Use of Speech Scale after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in younger children improves adaptability and social skills. GDDS is a sensitive tool of evaluating short-term effect of bilateral cochlear implants in neuropsychological development and constitutes a reliable predictor of speech production for the very younger pediatric cochlear implant users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
- The authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Yun Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
- The authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Huan Jia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
- The authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Wenxi Gu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaoyan Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
| | - Zhihua Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
| | - Minbo Xue
- Child Healthcare Department, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingjie Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Shi
- Clinical Research Center, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Linlin Jiang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
| | - Olivier Sterkers
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases (14DZ2260300), Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Coudert A, Reilly KT, Truy E, Moulin A, Gaveau V. A new tool for the assessment of speech understanding and spatial hearing difficulties in children: the Kid-SSQ questionnaire. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023. [PMID: 36763152 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07846-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and validate a new questionnaire, the Kid-SSQ, for the rapid screening of hearing abilities in children with hearing impairment, aged 7-17 years. METHODS The questionnaire was constructed from two existing, validated versions of the 'Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing' - (SSQ) questionnaire (pediatric form and adult short-form). The 12 selected items included auditory aspects from three subscales: speech perception, spatial hearing, and qualities of hearing. This new short form was then validated in 154 children with cochlear implants (100 bilaterally, and 54 unilaterally implanted children). Construct validity was assessed by testing relationships between Kid-SSQ scores and objective clinical parameters (e.g., age at test, pure-tone audiometry-PTA threshold, speech reception threshold-SRT, duration of binaural experience). RESULTS Completion time was acceptable for use with children (less than 10 min) and the non-response rate was less than 1%. Good internal consistency was obtained (Cronbach's α = 0.78), with a stable internal structure corresponding to the 3 intended subscales. External validity showed the specificity of each subscale: speech subscale scores were significantly predicted (r = 0.32, p < 0.001) by both 2 kHz PTA threshold (β = 0.33, p < 0.001) and SRT (β = - 0.23, p < 0.001). Children with more binaural experience showed significantly higher scores on the spatial subscale than children with less binaural experience (F(1,98) = 5.1, p < 0.03) and the qualities of hearing subscale scores significantly depended on both age and SRT (r = 0.32, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The Kid-SSQ questionnaire is a robust and clinically useful questionnaire for self-assessment of difficulties in various auditory domains.
Collapse
|
7
|
Maudoux A, Vitry S, El-Amraoui A. Vestibular Deficits in Deafness: Clinical Presentation, Animal Modeling, and Treatment Solutions. Front Neurol 2022; 13:816534. [PMID: 35444606 PMCID: PMC9013928 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.816534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The inner ear is responsible for both hearing and balance. These functions are dependent on the correct functioning of mechanosensitive hair cells, which convert sound- and motion-induced stimuli into electrical signals conveyed to the brain. During evolution of the inner ear, the major changes occurred in the hearing organ, whereas the structure of the vestibular organs remained constant in all vertebrates over the same period. Vestibular deficits are highly prevalent in humans, due to multiple intersecting causes: genetics, environmental factors, ototoxic drugs, infections and aging. Studies of deafness genes associated with balance deficits and their corresponding animal models have shed light on the development and function of these two sensory systems. Bilateral vestibular deficits often impair individual postural control, gaze stabilization, locomotion and spatial orientation. The resulting dizziness, vertigo, and/or falls (frequent in elderly populations) greatly affect patient quality of life. In the absence of treatment, prosthetic devices, such as vestibular implants, providing information about the direction, amplitude and velocity of body movements, are being developed and have given promising results in animal models and humans. Novel methods and techniques have led to major progress in gene therapies targeting the inner ear (gene supplementation and gene editing), 3D inner ear organoids and reprograming protocols for generating hair cell-like cells. These rapid advances in multiscale approaches covering basic research, clinical diagnostics and therapies are fostering interdisciplinary research to develop personalized treatments for vestibular disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Maudoux
- Unit Progressive Sensory Disorders, Pathophysiology and Therapy, Institut Pasteur, Institut de l'Audition, Université de Paris, INSERM-UMRS1120, Paris, France.,Center for Balance Evaluation in Children (EFEE), Otolaryngology Department, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine Vitry
- Unit Progressive Sensory Disorders, Pathophysiology and Therapy, Institut Pasteur, Institut de l'Audition, Université de Paris, INSERM-UMRS1120, Paris, France
| | - Aziz El-Amraoui
- Unit Progressive Sensory Disorders, Pathophysiology and Therapy, Institut Pasteur, Institut de l'Audition, Université de Paris, INSERM-UMRS1120, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lahlou G, Daoudi H, Ferrary E, Jia H, De Bergh M, Nguyen Y, Sterkers O, Mosnier I. Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult Patients. J Clin Med 2022; 11. [PMID: 35407482 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation is usually not recommended for prelingual profoundly deaf adults, although some of these patients might benefit from it. This study aims to define the candidates for cochlear implantation in this population. This retrospective study reviewed 34 prelingual profoundly deaf patients who had received a cochlear implant at 32 ± 1.7 years old (16−55), with at least 1 year of follow-up. Speech perception and quality of life were assessed before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation, then every year thereafter. According to the word speech intelligibility in quiet (WSI) 1 year after implantation, two groups were identified: good performer (GP) with WSI ≥ 50% (n = 15), and poor performer (PP) with WSI ≤ 40% (n = 19). At the 1 year mark, mean WSI improved by 28 ± 4.6% (−20−100) (p < 0.0001). In GP, the intelligibility for words and sentences, communication and quality of life scales improved. In PP, the communication scale improved, but not auditory performance or quality of life. GP and PP differed pre-operatively in speech production, communication abilities, and WSI in best-aided conditions. In prelingual profoundly deaf adults, a dramatic auditory performance benefit could be expected after cochlear implantation if the patients have some degree of speech intelligibility in aided conditions and have developed oral communication and speech production.
Collapse
|
9
|
Killan CF, Hoare DJ, Katiri R, Pierzycki RH, Adams B, Hartley DEH, Ropar D, Kitterick PT. A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear 2021. [PMID: 34347660 DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical practice regarding children's candidature for cochlear implantation varies internationally, albeit with a recent global trend toward implanting children with more residual hearing than in the past. The provision of either hearing aids or cochlear implants can influence a wide range of children's outcomes. However, guidance on eligibility and suitability for implantation is often based on a small number of studies and a limited range of speech perception measures. No recent reviews have catalogued what is known about comparative outcomes for children with severe hearing-loss using hearing aids to children using cochlear implants. This article describes the findings of a scoping review that addressed the question "What research has been conducted comparing cochlear implant outcomes to outcomes in children using hearing aids with severe hearing-loss in the better-hearing ear?" The first objective was to catalogue the characteristics of studies pertinent to these children's candidature for cochlear implantation, to inform families, clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers. The second objective was to identify gaps in the evidence base, to inform future research projects and identify opportunities for evidence synthesis. DESIGN We included studies comparing separate groups of children using hearing aids to those using cochlear implants and also repeated measures studies comparing outcomes of children with severe hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation. We included any outcomes that might feasibly be influenced by the provision of hearing aids or cochlear implants. We searched the electronic databases Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL, for peer-reviewed journal articles with full-texts written in English, published from July 2007 to October 2019. The scoping methodology followed the approach recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute regarding study selection, data extraction, and data presentation. RESULTS Twenty-one eligible studies were identified, conducted across 11 countries. The majority of children studied had either congenital or prelingual hearing loss, with typical cognitive function, experience of spoken language, and most implanted children used one implant. Speech and language development and speech perception were the most frequently assessed outcomes. However, some aspects of these outcomes were sparsely represented including voice, communication and pragmatic skills, and speech perception in complex background noise. Two studies compared literacy, two sound localization, one quality of life, and one psychosocial outcomes. None compared educational attainment, listening fatigue, balance, tinnitus, or music perception. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides a summary of the literature regarding comparative outcomes of children with severe hearing-loss using acoustic hearing aids and children using cochlear implants. Notable gaps in knowledge that could be addressed in future research includes children's quality of life, educational attainment, and complex listening and language outcomes, such as word and sentence understanding in background noise, spatial listening, communication and pragmatic skills. Clinician awareness of this sparse evidence base is important when making management decisions for children with more residual hearing than traditional implant candidates. This review also provides direction for researchers wishing to strengthen the evidence base upon which clinical decisions can be made.
Collapse
|
10
|
Coudert A, Gaveau V, Gatel J, Verdelet G, Salemme R, Farne A, Pavani F, Truy E. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements. Ear Hear 2021; 43:192-205. [PMID: 34225320 PMCID: PMC8694251 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. The aim of this study was to assess three-dimensional (3D) spatial hearing abilities in reaching space of children and adolescents fitted with bilateral cochlear implants (BCI). The study also investigated the impact of spontaneous head movements on sound localization abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Coudert
- Integrative Multisensory Perception Action & Cognition Team-ImpAct, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Femme Mere Enfant Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France Hospices Civils de Lyon, Neuro-immersion Platform, Lyon, France Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews the causes of tinnitus, hyperacusis, and otalgia, as well as hearing loss relevant for clinicians in the field of neurology. RECENT FINDINGS Important causes of unilateral and bilateral tinnitus are discussed, including those that are treatable or caused by serious structural or vascular causes. Concepts of hyperacusis and misophonia are covered, along with various types of neurologic disorders that can lead to pain in the ear. Hearing loss is common but not always purely otologic. SUMMARY Tinnitus and hearing loss are common symptoms that are sometimes related to a primary neurologic disorder. This review, tailored to neurologists who care for patients who may be referred to or encountered in neurology practice, provides information on hearing disorders, how to recognize when a neurologic process may be involved, and when to refer to otolaryngology or other specialists.
Collapse
|
12
|
Coez A, Fillon L, Saitovitch A, Rutten C, Marlin S, Boisgontier J, Vinçon-Leite A, Lemaitre H, Grévent D, Roux CJ, Dangouloff-Ros V, Levy R, Bizaguet E, Rouillon I, Garabédian EN, Denoyelle F, Zilbovicius M, Loundon N, Boddaert N. Arterial spin labeling brain MRI study to evaluate the impact of deafness on cerebral perfusion in 79 children before cochlear implantation. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 29:102510. [PMID: 33369563 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Arterial spin labeling brain MRI measure deafness impact on cerebral perfusion. Deafness in childhood modifies the temporal perfusion evolution across age. Cochlear implant pronostics is bad in case of high CBF values in occipital regions. Cochlear implantation before 4 years old is required.
Age at implantation is considered to be a major factor, influencing outcomes after pediatric cochlear implantation. In the absence of acoustic input, it has been proposed that cross-modal reorganization can be detrimental for adaptation to the new electrical input provided by a cochlear implant. Here, through a retrospective study, we aimed to investigate differences in cerebral blood flow (CBF) at rest prior to implantation in children with congenital deafness compared to normally hearing children. In addition, we looked at the putative link between pre-operative rest-CBF and the oral intelligibility scores at 12 months post-implantation. Finally, we observed the evolution of perfusion with age, within brain areas showing abnormal rest-CBF associated to deafness, in deaf children and in normally hearing children. In children older than 5 years old, results showed a significant bilateral hypoperfusion in temporal regions in deaf children, particularly in Heschl’s gyrus, and a significant hyperperfusion of occipital regions. Furthermore, in children older than 5 years old, whole brain voxel-by-voxel correlation analysis between pre-operative rest-CBF and oral intelligibility scores at 12 months post-implantation, showed significant negative correlation localized in the occipital regions: children who performed worse in the speech perception test one year after implantation were those presenting higher preoperative CBF values in these occipital regions. Finally, when comparing mean relative perfusion (extracted from the temporal regions found abnormal on whole-brain voxel-based analysis) across ages in patients and controls, we observed that the temporal perfusion evolution was significantly different in deaf children than in normally hearing children. Indeed, while temporal perfusion increased with age in normally hearing children, it remained stable in deaf children. We showed a critical period around 4 years old, where in the context of auditory deprivation, there is a lack of synaptic activity in auditory regions. These results support the benefits of early cochlear implantation to maximize the effectiveness of auditory rehabilitation and to avoid cross-modal reorganization.
Collapse
|
13
|
Mudry A. Mechanical ear and "blue book" in 1973. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2020; 137:439-440. [PMID: 32499149 DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implant has progressively become an essential treatment for profound hearing loss. The aim of this historical note is to briefly review the very beginnings of this technique, in 1973, with the production of a painting entitled "Mechanical ear" and the first international congress on cochlear implants. In a way, these two events marked the beginning of an antagonism that played a very important role in the development and especially the acceptance of cochlear implants in the multicultural society of the late twentieth century.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mudry
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, avenue de la Gare 6, CH-1003 Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang Y, Chen M, Zheng J, Hao J, Liu B, Liu W, Li B, Shao J, Liu H, Ni X, Zhang J. Clinical evaluation of cochlear implantation in children younger than 12 months of age. Pediatr Investig 2020; 4:99-103. [PMID: 32851352 PMCID: PMC7331375 DOI: 10.1002/ped4.12202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective therapy for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. It remains controversial whether children younger than 12 months of age should undergo CI. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CI in children younger than 12 months of age. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of clinical data of pediatric patients younger than 12 months of age who underwent CI and were followed up for 1 to 2 years. Patients' developmental levels were evaluated by the Gesell score before CI. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded to evaluate the safety of CI. Auditory and speech abilities were scored by the LittlEARS® auditory questionnaire (LEAQ), categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale (IT-MAIS), and meaningful use of speech scale (MUSS) at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after CI. The associations between clinical characteristics before CI and postoperative scores at 1 year after CI were analyzed by the linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS Eighty-nine children (47 boys and 42 girls) were included in this study (mean age at CI, 9.2 ± 1.6 months). Sixteen patients were diagnosed with cochlear malformation and 16 underwent bilateral CI. No severe complications occurred in any patients. The mean developmental quotient of the Gesell score was 78.00 ± 10.03. The median LEAQ scores were 0, 5, 10, 16, 22, 26 and 30 before and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after CI, respectively. These findings implied that the LEAQ score greatly improved in the first year after CI. The overall CAP, SIR, IT-MAIS, and MUSS scores also increased with increasing duration after CI. No significant associations were detected between clinical characteristics (age, sex, implant number, pre-CI Gesell score, and inner ear malformation) and LEAQ outcomes at 12 months after CI. INTERPRETATION With increasing duration after CI, auditory and speech behavior dramatically improve in young children. Our findings indicate that CI is feasible for children younger than 12 months of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Jun Zheng
- Beijing Tongren HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Jinsheng Hao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Bing Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Bei Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Jianbo Shao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Haihong Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Xin Ni
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryBeijing Children’s HospitalCapital Medical UniversityNational Center for Children’s HealthBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|