[Severe thoracic radionecrosis: muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (MSLD)]

Safety and aesthetic outcomes of double purse-string suture nipple reconstruction in early breast cancer patients undergoing nipple resection and endoscopic skin-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction

Background

The current surgical methods for managing incisions after nipple excision in breast reconstruction patients are limited. However, double purse-string suture (DPS) shows promise in the treatment of nipple excision. This study aimed to investigate the safety and aesthetic outcomes of DPS nipple reconstruction in early breast cancer patients who underwent endoscopic skin-sparing mastectomy (E-SSM) and breast reconstruction.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 87 early breast cancer patients with nipple excision who underwent E-SSM with breast reconstruction. According to the suture methods of nipple incision, all patients were divided into the spindle suture (SS) group, single purse-string suture (SPS) group, and DPS group, with SS and SPS groups combined as the traditional suture (TS) group. Then, we compared the groups' differences in aesthetic outcomes, surgical safety, and oncological safety.

Results

A total of 87 patients with 88 breasts were enrolled in this study (SS n=17, SPS n=21, DPS n=50). Patients in the DPS group had significantly better nipple reconstruction satisfaction, Harris scale and any complications incidence than the TS group (all p <0.05). For nipple reconstruction satisfaction and any complication, the adjusted OR (95%CI) of the DPS group were 6.314(1.095-36.415) (p=0.039) and 0.124(0.018-0.863) (p=0.035) compared with the SS group. One patient in the SS group had vertebral metastases, and no recurrence, metastasis, or death has been observed in the other two groups during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

DPS is an effective and safe nipple reconstruction procedure for patients undergoing E-SSM with breast reconstruction, delivering excellent aesthetic outcomes.

Reconstruction of an anterior chest wall radionecrosis defect by a contralateral latissimus dorsi flap: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue and bone radionecrosis are rare but serious complications may occur late after radiotherapy.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of an 86-year-old woman with a history an infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the left breast, treated by total mastectomy, left axillary dissection and adjuvant radiotherapy. Eighteen years later, the first radionecrosis lesions appeared and grew progressively in a 6-month period. These lesions are deep, involving the anterior aspect of the 4th to the 6th ribs and infiltrating the chest wall to the left cardio-thoracic space communicating largely with the pericardium. During axillary dissection, the neurovascular pedicle of the left latissimus dorsi muscle had been severed. The first part of the operation consisted of performing a left side parietectomy of the thoracic wall with a large resection of pericardial tissue and a small myocardial patch. The second step consisted of repairing the thoracic wall defect with a contralateral musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap.

CONCLUSION

Due to its significant axis of rotation, the latissimus dorsi muscle flap must be considered in the therapeutic algorithm for covering of contralateral anterior chest wall defects.

Tolerance of latissimus dorsi in immediate breast reconstruction without implant to radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) improves the quality of life of patients who undergo mastectomy. The latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) method provides particularly good aesthetic results, but its tolerance to subsequent radiotherapy remains unclear. We thus sought to assess tolerance and esthetic results and satisfaction, as reported by patients who underwent IBR by LDF with or without subsequent radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study in a population of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer between January 1999 and January 2014 and who had mastectomies with IBR by LDF without prostheses. We paired 29 patients who needed postoperative radiotherapy to 58 control patients who did not. These patients responded to a questionnaire to evaluate tolerance and their satisfaction with the aesthetic results of the reconstruction.

RESULTS

In total, 86.2% of all patients reported "very good" or "good" overall aesthetic satisfaction. Consistency was judged as "very good" or "good" by 82.7% of control patients and by 93.1% of case patients. No statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups with regard to reconstruction results. The number of surgical procedures needed did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In our study, IBR by LDF appeared to have excellent tolerance to subsequent radiotherapy, the latter having no impact on patient aesthetic satisfaction. Our results suggest that the possibility of postoperative radiotherapy should not prevent physicians from proposing this method to women who are candidates for it.