Tenofovir alafenamide demonstrates broad cross-genotype activity against wild-type HBV clinical isolates and maintains susceptibility to drug-resistant HBV isolates in vitro

Virological responses to tenofovir-alafenamide-containing antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV co-infected with lamivudine-resistant or lamivudine-susceptible hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND

Data on the effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) against lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) hepatitis B virus (HBV) among patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV are limited.

METHODS

Between April and December 2018, HIV-positive patients co-infected with LAM-R or lamivudine-susceptible (LAM-S) HBV who switched from tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) to TAF-containing ART were followed for 96 weeks. Plasma HBV and HIV loads, HBV serological markers, and liver function before and after the switch were analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 182 patients co-infected with HIV and HBV were included in this study: 45 with LAM-R HBV and 137 with LAM-S HBV. At baseline, 28.9% and 7.4% of patients in the LAM-R and LAM-S groups, respectively, tested positive for hepatitis B virus envelope antigen (HBeAg) (P<0.001), and the respective percentages of patients who had achieved plasma HBV DNA <20 IU/mL were 95.5% and 97.1%. At weeks 48 and 96, 100% and 94.9% of patients in the LAM-R group, respectively, and 97.1% and 95.6% of patients in the LAM-S group, respectively, maintained plasma HBV DNA <20 IU/mL. Lamivudine resistance of HBV and baseline hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) level were associated with HBsAg decrement at week 96 at a degree of 0.25 log₁₀ IU/mL [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.059-0.246] and 0.22 log₁₀ IU/mL (per 1-log₁₀IU/mL increase, 95% CI 0.018-0.101), respectively. At week 96, 2.2% (4/182) of patients had HBsAg loss; no patients in the LAM-R group and 25.0% (2/8) of patients in the LAM-S group had HBeAg seroconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to TAF-containing regimens maintained high rates of HBV viral suppression in patients co-infected with either LAM-R or LAM-S HBV. The decrease in HBsAg was minimal, and HBsAg seroconversion occurred infrequently.

Pharmacological approaches to prevent vertical transmission of HIV and HBV

INTRODUCTION

Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) is mainly responsible for the global pediatric HIV and HBV epidemic. Vertical transmission can be prevented and reduced through a series of interventions at the primary healthcare level, including extensive screening of pregnant women, administration of antivirals or immune-based treatments, counselling on type of delivery and breastfeeding.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, approved therapeutic options for the treatment of pregnant women living with HIV or HBV are discussed with special focus on efficacy and safety profiles of each agent or drug class examined. The search was performed using Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify studies assessing vertical transmission of both HIV and HBV.

EXPERT OPINION

Elimination of MTCT of both infections is firmly endorsed by major global commitments and the integration of tailored preventive interventions into maternal and newborn health services is of strategical importance to achieve this critical target. However, further research centered on antiviral-based and immunization trials among pregnant women is urgently needed to mitigate the risk of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, effectively prevent transmission to the offspring and finally eliminate the pediatric HIV and HBV epidemic, one of the key global health challenges of our time.

Systemic delivery of tenofovir alafenamide using dissolving and implantable microneedle patches

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a global health concern, with 37.7 million people currently living with the infection and 1.5 million new cases every year. Current antiretroviral (ARV) therapies are administered through the oral route daily, often in lifelong treatments, leading to pill fatigue and poor treatment adherence. Therefore, the development of novel formulations for the administration ARV drugs using alternative routes is actively sought out. In this sense, microneedle array patches (MAPs) offer a unique user-centric platform that can be painlessly self-applied to the skin and deliver drugs to the systemic circulation. In this work, dissolving and implantable MAPs loaded with the tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) were developed with the aim of releasing the drug systemically. Both MAPs were sufficiently strong to pierce excised neonatal full-thickness porcine skin and form drug depots. In vitro release experiments performed in dialysis membrane models, demonstrated a relatively fast delivery of the drug in all cases. Franz cells experiments revealed that dissolving and implantable MAPs deposited 47.87 ​± ​16.33 ​μg and 1208.04 ​± ​417.9 ​μg of TAF in the skin after 24 ​h. Pharmacokinetic experiments in rats demonstrated a fast metabolization of TAF into tenofovir, with a rapid elimination of the metabolite from the plasma. The MAPs described in this work could be used as an alternative to current oral treatments for HIV management.

•

HIV is still a global concern, with 38 million people currently living with the infection.

•

ARV therapy can prevent HIV spread and extend life expectancy in infected people.

•

MAPs constitute an attractive platform for the delivery of antiretroviral drugs including TAF.

•

Dissolving and implantable TAF MAPs were obtained and characterised in vitro and ex vivo.

•

Both MAPs were able to deliver TAF systemically in rats.

Efficacy of different nucleoside analog rescue therapies for entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

Entecavir (ETV) is recommended as a first-line anti-HBV treatment. However, many chronic hepatitis B patients initiate anti-HBV treatment such as lamivudine and telbivudine with low genetic barriers in China, which leads to compensatory mutations and increases the rate of ETV resistance. The management of ETV resistance in China is an essential clinical issue.

METHODS

Patients from 2011 to 2017 with nucleos(t)ide analog resistance were screened and 72 patients with ETV resistance were included. These patients received different rescue therapies including an ETV and adefovir (ADV) combination therapy group (n = 25), a tenofovir (TDF) monotherapy group (n = 27), and an ETV and TDF combination therapy group (n = 20). Virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

The rate of ETV resistance among all HBV-resistant variants increased from 6.04% in 2011 to 15.02% in 2017. TDF monotherapy and TDF combination groups showed similar rates of negative HBV DNA at 48 weeks (74.07% vs 70.00%, P > 0.05), while the ETV and ADV group showed the worst virologic response (28.00%). Also, TDF monotherapy and TDF combination therapy showed similar decline of HBV DNA at weeks 12, 24, and 48. There was no significant difference in the rates of HBeAg clearance, ALT normalization, and abnormal renal function among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy showed a comparable virologic response to TDF and ETV combination therapy and a better virologic response than ETV and ADV combination therapy. Thus, TDF monotherapy is the preferred rescue therapy for ETV resistance.

Suboptimal Response to Tenofovir Alafenamide in Two Patients With HBeAg-Positive Hepatitis B: A Case Report

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is one of the most potent first-line nucleot(s)ide analogs for treating chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. To date, no cases of TAF drug resistance and/or suboptimal response have been reported. To our knowledge, this is the first report of two adult male patients presenting a suboptimal response response to TAF monotherapy. Our study indicates long-term observations and extensive data are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAF, and highlights the need for the development of robust novel direct-acting antivirals and immune therapies for HBV.

Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Formulations of Tenofovir Alafenamide Tablets in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

Purpose

To evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of two formulations of 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide tablets in Chinese healthy male and female subjects under fed and fasting conditions.

Patients and Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, single-center, crossover study consisting of a fasting trial with two periods and a fed trial with four periods. In total, 42 healthy subjects were enrolled in the fasting trial and 32 healthy subjects were enrolled in the fed trial. In each period, blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected until 72 hours post-dose. The plasma concentrations of tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir were measured and noncompartmental analysis was used to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Throughout the entire study, subjects' safety was monitored by assessment of physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiography, clinical laboratory parameters, and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

Forty subjects completed the fasting trial and 32 subjects completed the fed trial. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for AUC_0-t, AUC_0-∞, and C_max for the two formulations were within 80.00% to 125.00%, which met the bioequivalence acceptance criteria. The study drugs were well tolerated by all subjects.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the test formulation of 25 mg tenofovir alafenamide tablets was bioequivalent to the formulation marketed under the brand name VEMLIDY^® in healthy Chinese male and female subjects under fasting and fed conditions.

Analysis of long-term safety and efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for chronic hepatitis B throughout pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the efficacy and long-term safety of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy throughout pregnancy for women with chronic hepatitis B and their children.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 165 women in total: 91 women received telbivudine (LDT) and 74 women received tenofovir (TDF) throughout pregnancy. The virological response and safety in women were recorded, and the physical development and bone mineral density in children were evaluated up to 5 years of age.

RESULTS

The rate of virological breakthrough in women was 4.24% overall (7.70% in LDT group and 0% in TDF group; P < 0.05). No cases of renal injury or other obstetric adverse events occurred in either group of women. Among the children, only one child had a significantly low Z score for weight for age (<-2), and no children had a significantly low Z score for height for age or bone mineral density. No significant difference was found between the children in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy with TDF or LDT throughout pregnancy had no effect on the long-term physical development and bone development of children. In addition, the use of TDF throughout pregnancy had better long-term antiviral efficacy than LDT in women, with no evidence of renal toxicity.

Generation of an HBV core phenotyping assay for evaluating HBV capsid compounds

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsids are assembled from HBV core protein and assembly is a critical step in the propagation of the virus. Due to its multiple functions in the viral life cycle, core is an attractive target for new antiviral therapies. For HBV capsid assembly modulators (CAMs), several resistance mutants have been identified, both from the clinic and in vitro. However, currently there is no convenient in vitro assay to monitor resistance to CAMs in the clinic. Here, we developed a facile, cassette-based phenotyping assay to assess the antiviral activity of CAMs on a panel of clinical isolates. Using this system, the core genes from 13 patients infected with HBV genotypes A-H were expressed as chimeric virus and tested for sensitivity to CAMs. No substantial differences in antiviral activity were observed across genotypes due to the conservation of the drug binding pocket. In addition, we tested a panel of constructs encoding 13 single amino acid polymorphs in the CAM binding site, including some polymorphs with previously-described resistance to CAMs. Overall, 11 of 13 constructs replicated in vitro, 6 constructs showed reduced susceptibility to CAMs. The 11 polymorphs which could replicate in vitro remained sensitive to the nucleotide analog tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), indicating that there is no cross-resistance.

Characterization of Hepatitis B virus polymerase mutations A194T and CYEI and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide resistance

Both the A194T and a quadruple mutation CYEI (S106C, H126Y, D134E and L269I) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase reverse transcriptase domain (pol/RT) are suggested to be associated with treatment failure with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). To further evaluate this assertion, the prevalence of these mutations at baseline as well as their development and/or loss during TDF and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) treatment was analysed in 3886 patients enrolled in Gilead HBV clinical studies. In total, six out of 3886 (0.2%) patients carried the rtA194T mutation, while only 1 patient carried a triple CYE and 2 patients carried a quadruple CYEI mutation at baseline. All the patients harbouring rtA194T or CYE/CYEI at baseline achieved viral suppression by week 96 after TDF or TAF treatment. No patients developed an rtA194T mutation or > 1 substitution of CYEI, and the number of patients losing any substitutions of CYEI (n = 17) was similar to the number who developed a single substitution of CYEI (n = 32) during treatment. Phenotypic evaluation of the site-directed mutant (SDM) panel containing these mutations with or without other resistance mutations did not demonstrate a significant shift in TFV and TAF potency in vitro. No evidence of rtA194T and CYEI conferring resistance to TDF or TAF was observed based on the treatment responses to TDF or TAF in patients with mutations at baseline, the lack of selection of mutations after starting TDF or TAF treatment and no change in susceptibility to TFV or TAF in vitro.

Hepatitis B virus resistance to tenofovir: fact or fiction? A systematic literature review and structural analysis of drug resistance mechanisms

Background: Tenofovir (TFV) is a widely used treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. There is a high genetic barrier to the selection of TFV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), but the distribution and clinical significance of TFV RAMs are not well understood. We here present assimilated evidence for putative TFV RAMs with the aims of cataloguing and characterising mutations that have been reported, and starting to develop insights into mechanisms of resistance. Methods: We carried out a systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus to identify clinical, in vitro and in silico evidence of TFV resistance. We included peer-reviewed studies presenting original data regarding virological TFV breakthrough, using published methods to assess the quality of each study. We generated a list of RAMs that have been reported in association with TFV resistance, developing a 'long-list' (all reported RAMs) and a 'short-list' (a refined list supported by the most robust evidence). We assessed the potential functional and structural consequences by mapping onto the crystal structure for HIV reverse transcriptase (RT), as the structure of HBV RT has not been solved. Results: We identified a 'long-list' of 37 putative TFV RAMs in HBV RT, occurring within and outside sites of enzyme activity, some of which can be mapped onto a homologous HIV RT structure. A 'short-list' of nine sites are supported by the most robust evidence. If clinically significant resistance arises, it is most likely to be in the context of suites of multiple RAMs. Other factors including adherence, viral load, HBeAg status, HIV coinfection and NA dosage may also influence viraemic suppression. Conclusion: There is emerging evidence for polymorphisms that may reduce susceptibility to TVF. However, good correlation between viral sequence and treatment outcomes is currently lacking; further studies are essential to optimise individual treatment and public health approaches.

Pharmacokinetics of a weekly transdermal delivery system of tenofovir alafenamide in hairless rats

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a potent prodrug of tenofovir (TFV) for HIV prophylaxis, and HIV and HBV treatment. Compared to oral daily doses, transdermal administration of TAF may be more advantageous for long-term adherence by offering sustained drug delivery and reduced dosing frequency. Here, we described the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of an optimized once-weekly suspension transdermal delivery system (TDS) for TAF (96 mg/25 cm² of TDS) in female hairless rats. Over the study period, the TAF TDS delivered an overall low level of TAF (median: 1.43 [0.02-3.28] ng/mL) and a sustained level of the stable metabolite and parent drug, TFV. Relative to the projected exposure corresponding to six-day oral daily doses, a comparable TAF exposure but a substantially lower TFV exposure was resulted from the TAF TDS, suggesting a lower risk of TFV-associated adverse effects. TAF, TFV, and phosphorylated TFVs (TFV-monophosphate and diphosphate) were found distributed in vaginal tissue, the portal of entry for HIV during male-to-female sexual transmission. Skin adhesion and tolerance were acceptable given the animal model used. PK evaluation of the TAF TDS in hairless rats demonstrates the proof of concept that transdermal delivery can be an alternative route for a sustained, once-weekly systemic delivery of TAF.

An expert review on the use of tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Asia

Asia has intermediate-to-high prevalence and high morbidity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The use of guideline-recommended nucleos(t)ide analogs with high barrier to resistance, such as entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), is one of the key interventions for curbing HBV infection and associated morbidity in Asia. However, there are some challenges to the use of ETV and TDF; while ETV is associated with high resistance in lamivudine (LAM)-exposed (especially LAM-refractory) patients; bone and renal safety issues are a major concern with TDF. Hence, a panel of twenty-eight expert hepatologists from Asia convened, reviewed the literature, and developed the current expert opinion-based review article for the use of TAF in the resource-constrained settings in Asia. This article provides a comprehensive review of two large, phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trials of TAF versus TDF in HBeAg-negative (study 0108) and HBeAg-positive (study 0110) chronic HBV patients (> 70% Asians). These studies revealed as follows: (1) non-inferiority for the proportion of patients who had HBV DNA < 29 IU/mL; (2) significantly high rate of normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels; (3) no incidence of resistance; and (4) significantly better bone and renal safety, with TAF vs. TDF up to 144 weeks. Considering the benefits of TAF, the expert panel proposed recommendations for optimizing the use of TAF in Asia, along with guidance on specific patient groups at risk of renal or bone disease suitable for TAF therapy. The guidance provided in this article may help clinicians optimize the use of TAF in Asia.

Entecavir monotherapy versus de novo combination of lamivudine and adefovir for compensated hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: a real-world prospective multicenter cohort study

Background

De novo combination of lamivudine (Lam) and adefovir (Adv) was not rarely used in clinical practice. However, head-to-head comparisons of entecavir (Etv) monotherapy with this combination in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related compensated cirrhosis patients are unavailable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Etv monotherapy with combination therapy in patients with HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis.

Methods

Treatment-naïve patients with HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis were recruited to receive either Etv monotherapy or a de novo combination of Lam and Adv. Data were collected at baseline and every 6 months thereafter.

Results

A total of 578 patients (485 in Etv group, 93 in combination group) were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. At the end of 1, 2, and 3 years, HBV DNA was undetectable in 82.7%, 96.2%, and 94.3% of patients in the Etv group and 88.9%, 81.7%, and 84.6% in the combination group, respectively (all P>0.05). The cumulative virological breakthrough rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 2.7%, 6.7%, and 9.8% in the Etv group and 2.9%, 13.3%, and 32.2% in the combination group, respectively (P=0.003). After propensity-score adjustment for age, sex, and baseline HBeAg, ALT, and total bilirubin, virological breakthrough was higher in the de novo combination of Lam and Adv (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.37–5.86; P<0.01). The cumulative rate of liver-related events, including decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma, at 1, 2, and 3 years was 2.9%, 4.2%, and 6.1% in the Etv group and 2.2%, 2.2%, and 6.7% in combination group, respectively (P=0.83). Biochemical response and serological response were similar between the groups.

Conclusion

Etv treatment had less virological breakthrough and potentially higher HBV-DNA suppression than de novo combination of Lam and Adv during 3 years in treatment-naïve HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis.

Changes in Liver Tissue Trace Element Concentrations During Hepatitis B Viral Infection Treatment

Approximately 350-400 million people in the world have Hbs Ag (hepatitis B virus surface antigen) positivity. In the international guidelines, the permanent suppression of replication in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection therapy is reported as the primary therapeutic goal. Trace elements play a key role in liver diseases. The aim of our study is to determine some trace element concentrations in the liver during HBV treatment periods. The measurement of 11 trace elements (manganese, lead, nickel, chromium, cadmium, iron, copper, zinc, silver, cobalt, and aluminum) was carried out by the method of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in liver biopsy materials (before starting treatment and at the sixth month of the treatment period). There was an increase in zinc and copper concentrations in liver materials at the sixth month of treatment compared to the pre-treatment values (the median zinc value was 48.05 μg/g before treatment and 74.9 μg/g at 6 months after initial treatment, p = 0.035; median copper was 2.82 μg/g before treatment and 5.31 μg/g after 6 months, p = 0.002). General estimations indicated that zinc (p = 0.002), iron (p = 0.0244), copper (p = 0.0003), and aluminum (p = 0.0239) values may be effective in HAI (histological activity index) changes. Only iron levels could be at a very low level effective on the changes caused by fibrosis (p = 0.0002). Liver tissue zinc and copper levels increased in parallel with the improvement of inflammation in antiviral-treated HBV patients. In addition, the levels of zinc and copper in the liver tissue can be useful markers for liver tissue damage detection.

The management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in children

In the present paper, we review the increased disease burden of hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infection that is recognized worldwide; especially in children when the most common mode of transmission is vertically from infected mothers. In children with HBV and HCV infection, spontaneous clearance of the virus in the first years of life is not common, in contrast with adults, but these patients often stay asymptomatic until early adulthood, when disease has progressed to chronic hepatitis with increased risk of cirrhosis and its complication, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Due to limited treatment options of HBV infection in the pediatric population, clinicians focus on primary prevention, by vaccinating all infants during their first days of life. Infants born to infected mothers, receive intravenous immunoglobulin on top of the vaccine, and thus preventing transmission in 95% of the infants. While for HCV infection, since there is no vaccine to prevent HCV disease, providers focus primarily on treatment. The treatment landscape of HCV infection in children rapidly evolves, away from interferon regimens, and towards direct-acting antiviral agents that have a safer and more efficacious drug profile. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials investigating the efficacy and tolerance of direct-acting agents in children below 12 years of age.

No Resistance to Tenofovir Alafenamide Detected through 96 Weeks of Treatment in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has shown equivalent efficacy and improved safety profiles for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). However, limited data are available for its resistance profiles. In two clinical trials, 1,298 hepatitis E antigen-positive and -negative patients with CHB were randomized 2:1 and treated with TAF (n = 866) or TDF (n = 432). Baseline nucleos(t)ide analog resistance substitutions in HBV polymerase/reverse transcriptase (Pol/RT) were assessed using INNO-LiPA Multi-DR v2/v3. Resistance surveillance was conducted for patients with viremia (HBV DNA ≥ 69IU/ml) by HBV Pol/RT sequencing at week 96 or at discontinuation. In vitro phenotypic analysis was performed for patients with conserved site substitutions or virologic breakthrough while adherent to the study drug. At baseline, the majority of patients harbored virus with wild-type Pol/RT (89.2%), with 10.8% harboring resistance associated mutations. A similar percentage of patients in the TAF or TDF groups qualified for sequence analysis through week 96 (TAF, 11.1%; TDF, 10.9%). Of these, a small percentage of patients experienced virologic breakthrough (TAF, 2.8%; TDF, 3.2%) that was often associated with drug nonadherence (TAF, 30%; TDF, 50%). Across treatment groups, 132 patients qualified for sequence analysis through week 96, with nearly half having no sequence changes from baseline (43.2%). Most sequence changes occurred at polymorphic positions, and no isolates showed a reduction in susceptibility in vitro After 96 weeks, the proportion of patients achieving virus suppression (HBV DNA < 69 IU/ml) was similar across treatment groups, and no substitutions associated with resistance to TAF or TDF were detected. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT01940471 and NCT01940341.).

Discovery of the Novel Entecavir-Resistant Hepatitis B Virus Reverse Transcriptase A181C Substitution From an Integrated Genotypic Analysis

Entecavir (ETV) is a first-line therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), demonstrating potent suppression of HBV DNA and a high barrier to viral resistance. Previous studies revealed that ETV-resistant (ETVr) HBV DNA resulted from substitutions in the HBV reverse transcriptase (RT) at positions rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250 in combination with lamivudine resistance (LVDr) substitutions rtM204I/V±rtL180M. In vitro, viral variants exhibit varying degrees of ETV susceptibility and replication capacity depending on specific resistance substitutions. To explore the potential for additional pathways to ETVr, HBV RT sequences from 982 evaluable patients enrolled in 17 ETV clinical studies were analyzed. Thirty novel emergent substitutions at amino acid positions not previously associated with HBV nucleos(t)ide drug resistance were observed in at least 2 patients and were identified in patient-derived HBV with a wild-type, LVDr, or ETVr RT sequence. Phenotypic analysis of these substitutions indicated that they had no effect on ETV susceptibility. Phenotypic analysis was also performed on patient-derived HBV RT sequences from 10 LVD-naive and 13 LVD-experienced patients with virologic breakthrough and emergent novel substitutions while on ETV treatment. One LVD-experienced patient-derived HBV RT harboring LVDr substitutions rtL180M+rtM204V with rtA181C displayed reduced ETV susceptibility (122-fold greater than wild-type HBV) and remained susceptible to adefovir and tenofovir. HBV harboring the rtA181C substitution without LVDr substitutions rtL180M+rtM204V remained susceptible to inhibition by ETV, adefovir, and tenofovir, although cross-resistance to LVD and telbivudine was observed. Conclusion: An integrated genotypic analysis of HBV RT sequences from patients with chronic HBV treated with ETV led to the discovery of the novel ETVr substitution rtA181C. This substitution was always detected in combination with LVDr substitutions rtL180M+rtM204V in ETV-treated patients.

Role of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in the treatment and prophylaxis of HIV and HBV infections

Tenofovir (TFV) is the cornerstone of the treatment and prophylaxis of HIV infections. It has been routinely used in its prodrug form TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) combined with emtricitabine ((-)FTC) and other antiretroviral agents. TDF has now been replaced by TAF (tenofovir alafenamide) which allows better uptake by the lymphoid tissue. In combination with elvitegravir (E), cobicistat (C), emtricitabine (F), TAF can be advocated as an STR (single tablet regimen, Genvoya®) for the treatment of HIV infections. In this combination, E and C may in the future be replaced by bictegravir. The prophylaxis of HIV infection is momentarily based upon Truvada®, the combination of F with TDF, which in the future may also be replaced by TAF. TAF (Vemlidy®) has also replaced TDF (Viread®) for the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. Both TDF and TAF offer little or no risk for virus-drug resistance. As compared to TDF, TAF limits the risk for nephrotoxicity and loss of bone mineral density. What remains to be settled, however, before the universal use of TAF could be recommended, is its safety during pregnancy and its applicability in the treatment of tuberculosis, in combination with rifampicin.

Tenofovir alafenamide as a rescue therapy in a patient with HBV-cirrhosis with a history of Fanconi syndrome and multidrug resistance

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a recommended first-line therapy for both naïve and experienced patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), although reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hypophosphatemia, hyperphosphaturia and Fanconi syndrome have been reported in some patients. Entecavir (ETV) could be considered as a rescue therapy for TDF-treated patients developing renal dysfunction, though patients with prior history of treatment with lamivudine (LAM) can develop ETV resistance strains, which can lead to potentially severe hepatitis flares. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a new prodrug of tenofovir, has recently been developed to improve the renal and bone safety profile compared to TDF, while maintaining the same virologic efficacy. The recently published 48-week phase III TAF registration studies confirmed the superior safety profile. Here we describe a case of a 75-year-old woman with HBV mono-infection and compensated cirrhosis who developed ETV resistant strains and grade 3 chronic kidney disease after many years of LAM and adefovir (ADV) treatment and a TDF-induced Fanconi syndrome. The administration of 25mg/day of TAF, granted as part of a compassionate use program, rapidly suppressed viral replication to undetectable levels without worsening renal function or side effects.

Tenofovir Alafenamide: A Review in Chronic Hepatitis B

Tenofovir alafenamide (AF) [Vemlidy^®], an oral prodrug of tenofovir, was developed to optimize the antiviral potency and clinical safety of the active moiety tenofovir diphosphate (selective reverse transcriptase nucleotide inhibitor). In two identically designed, ongoing, multinational trials in treatment-naive and -experienced adult patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive or -negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, once-daily tenofovir AF 25 mg provided effective and sustained viral suppression (120-week analysis), and was generally well tolerated. In the primary 48-week analysis, tenofovir AF was noninferior to once-daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) 300 mg in terms of the proportion of patients achieving viral suppression (HBV DNA <29 IU/mL) and was associated with significantly higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization rates than tenofovir DF based on AASLD criteria (but not central laboratory criteria). In pooled analyses and/or individual trials, ALT normalization rates by AASLD and central laboratory criteria were significantly higher in tenofovir AF than tenofovir DF recipients at most assessed timepoints up to 96 weeks. Given the bone and renal safety concerns associated with long-term tenofovir DF treatment, the more favourable pharmacological profile of tenofovir AF permits a marked reduction in the dosage of this tenofovir prodrug and thereby reduces systemic exposure to tenofovir, potentially improving the bone and renal safety of tenofovir AF versus tenofovir DF. Long-term clinical experience will more definitively establish the relative bone and renal safety of these tenofovir prodrugs. With its potential for an improved safety profile, tenofovir AF is an important emerging first-line option for the treatment of chronic HBV infection in adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years and with a bodyweight of ≥35 kg).

Recommendations for the treatment of hepatitis B in 2017

The therapeutic goal which is currently unfrequent but realistic in HBV infected patients is sustained HBsAg clearance. It is preceded by the loss or significant suppression of HBV replication and leads to inhibition of the progression of liver fibrosis, normalization of biochemical indicators of liver damage, reduction in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, prolongation of survival, prevention of HBV infection in the transplanted organ in post-transplant patients, enhancement of the quality of life, inhibition or reversal of extrahepatic changes associated with HBV infection, and halting of the spread of HBV infections. Recommendations of Polish Group of Experts for HBV for 2017 provide guidelines to assess treatment eligibility, choice of the first-line drug, monitoring and duration of treatment, management of treatment failure as well as therapy of HBV associated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover it contains advice for treatment of HBV infection in children, females planning pregnancy or pregnant. We also included recommendations for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis, prevention of HBV transmission from mother to infant, after liver transplantation, on immunosuppressive therapy and during HCV treatment.