Parental acceptance of an intranasal vaccine: Example of influenza vaccine

Real-world effectiveness of influenza vaccination in preventing influenza and influenza-like illness in children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV-4) offer an alternative to inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) for children aged 2-17 years, but data on their comparative effectiveness are limited. This study assessed vaccination rates and real-world effectiveness of LAIV-4 and IIV in preventing influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) in Italian children during the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 seasons.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study of children aged 2-14 years from September 2022 to April 2024, using data from Pedianet, a pediatric primary care database of anonymized records from family pediatricians. Children vaccinated with LAIV-4 or IIV were compared to unvaccinated children. The primary outcome was any first influenza or ILI episode. Monthly vaccination incidence rates per 1000 person-months were calculated for each vaccine type. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for vaccine effectiveness (VE) were estimated using adjusted mixed-effects Cox models.

RESULTS

A total of 65,545 (472,173 person-months) and 72,377 (527,348 person-months) children were included for the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 seasons, respectively. Vaccination rates were 12.71 and 12.85 per 1000 person-months, respectively. Compared to unvaccinated children, LAIV-4 had an overall effectiveness of 43 % (95 % CI, 32 %-53 %), while IIV effectiveness was 54 % (95 % CI, 46 %-61 %). In 2022-2023, LAIV-4 (38 % [95 % CI, 12 %-56 %]) and IIV (49 % [95 % CI, 37 %-58 %]) had comparable effectiveness. In 2023-2024, LAIV-4 (40 % [95 % CI, 25 %-52 %]) was slightly less effective than IIV (58 % [95 % CI, 44 %-68 %])(p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

An overall moderate, comparable effectiveness of LAIV-4 and IIV in preventing influenza/ILI among Italian children was observed.

Peptide therapeutics: current status and future opportunity with focus on nose-to-brain delivery☆

Peptide drugs are a highly diverse group of therapeutic agents. Over the last decade, more than 40 peptides have been approved for clinical use. They target different structures, ranging from G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to pathogens and are used to treat a variety of indications, including metabolic disorders, genetic diseases, acute illnesses and more. Structurally, peptide therapeutics are a heterogeneous class. This diversity allows them to bridge the gap between small molecules and biologics. However, limited metabolic stability and bioavailability must be addressed. Strategies to improve the half-life include backbone and sequence modification, cyclization and the addition of stabilizing moieties. Great strides have been made in recent years towards achieving sufficient drug uptake for oral application have been achieved within recent years. However, these methods require specialized peptide design or involve permeabilization of the gastrointestinal tract. Consequently, other routes of administration are being explored. One promising approach is the nasal application of peptides. This method can be used for systemic uptake, but also allows for direct nose-to-brain delivery of compounds. While successful nose-to-brain delivery is already used in the clinic, the underlining mechanisms are poorly understood. Strategies for rational optimization are needed to make this method more applicable to a wider range of compounds. Overall, approved peptide therapeutics cover a wide range of applications and have demonstrated a growing and novel potential in recent drug discovery.

Underutilization of Injectable Parkinson's Disease Medication: An Analysis of Neurologist and Patient Perspectives

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that many neurologists underestimate patients' willingness to self-administer injectable Parkinson's disease (PD) medication.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient and physician perceptions contributing to underutilization of PD medications for acute OFF episodes.

ANALYTIC METHOD

Data were collected using an online survey including n = 4063 PD patients experiencing OFF episodes and n = 200 neurologists.

RESULTS

89% of patients were willing to self-inject rescue therapies to treat acute OFF episodes. After reviewing patient survey data, 54% of general neurologists and 37% of movement disorder specialist (MDS) demonstrated a change in perceptions about patients' willingness to use self-injected therapies (P < 0.05). 37% of general neurologists and 21% of MDS indicated a greater likelihood of prescribing these treatments (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients suffering from OFF episodes would be willing to self-inject to abort their symptoms. Neurologists underestimate this patient acceptance. Understanding patient attitudes and further education about rescue therapies is likely to increase use of these therapies.

Influence of the Olfatín Project on the reduction of pain related to intranasal influenza vaccination, as part of a school influenza vaccination program

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of viewing the Olfatín Project video on the assessment of school LAIV-associated pain in three and four-year-old children through the Wong Baker Faces® pain classification scale.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A three-arm randomized multicenter clinical trial with a placebo control group was carried out. The main variable measured was pain, assessed through the score on the Wong Baker Faces® Pain Rating Scale. There were a total population of 4591 children three and four-year-olds (born in 2019 and 2020) and who attended the 1st and 2nd year of early childhood education. Before the school vaccination, researchers randomly assigned participant schools corresponding to each of the basic health areas to each of the three study groups: Olfatín's video viewing, a control video viewing not related to influenza and no video viewing.

RESULTS

No significant differences according to sex, age or the minor's grade according to the assigned intervention were detected. 72.3% of those vaccinated assigned a 0 from the Wong Baker Faces® scale: 75.4% of those who watched Olfatín's video, 68.3% for those in Drilo's group and 72.8% for those who didn't watch any video, but without significant differences (p = 0.08). There were no significant differences either stratifying by sex.

CONCLUSION

LAIV is a painless vaccine for children, which has to be taken into account by the health authorities when planning the pediatric influenza vaccination campaign.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Olfatín's cartoon video can be used by professionals to create a greater experience for children and therefore a better acceptance.

Parental vaccine hesitancy and influenza vaccine type preferences during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) greatly reduces disease burden among school-aged children, yet parental vaccine hesitancy remains a persistent challenge. Two types of SIV are available for children in Hong Kong and other locations: inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), administered through intramuscular injection, and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), administered via nasal spray. We aimed to understand how vaccine hesitancy shaped parental preference for LAIV versus IIV, particularly amidst important public health events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the massive rollout of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.

METHODS

We employed a concurrent mixed-methods design. The quantitative part involves longitudinal surveys spanning three years, from pre-pandemic to post-pandemic periods, tracking parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for SIV types. The qualitative part involves 48 in-depth interviews, providing insights into parental preference for SIV types, underlying reasons, and related values.

RESULTS

Our quantitative analyses show an overall increase in parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for LAIV over IIV after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and especially after the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Further logistic regression modelling based on the cohort data shows that higher vaccine hesitancy, coupled with the COVID-19 vaccination campaign rollout, predicts a greater preference for LAIV over IIV. The qualitative analysis complements these results, highlighting that LAIV's non-invasive nature aligns with parental values of prioritizing natural immunity and concerns about overmedication, leading to a more acceptable attitude towards LAIV.

CONCLUSIONS

Leveraging the higher acceptability of LAIV compared to IIV among parents with high vaccine hesitancy could promote childhood vaccination uptake.

Acceptability for the influenza virus vector COVID-19 vaccine for intranasal spray: A cross-sectional survey in Beijing, China

The intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine was made available for the first time in China, it is necessary to understand receivers' satisfaction and experience toward the vaccine to help optimize vaccination service. A self-administered multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in Beijing, China, in December 2022. The vaccination experience was evaluated through three dimensions: immediate tolerance, smooth progress, and time-saving. Vaccine acceptability was measured by receivers' preference for the intranasal spray over intramuscular injection after vaccination and their recommendation willingness. Stepwise multinomial and binary logistic regression models were applied to investigate factors associated with vaccine acceptability. Among 10,452 participants included in the analysis, 92.6% felt no discomfort during the inoculation, 99.8% thought the vaccination process went well, and 89.4% deemed it a time-saving option. For vaccine acceptability, 5566 (53.3%) participants were willing to recommend the vaccine to others, 534 (5.1%) refused, and 4352 (41.6%) had not decided yet; 6142 (58.8%) participants preferred the intranasal spray, 873 (8.4%) preferred the intramuscular injection, and 3437 (32.9%) had no preferences. The most concerned aspects of the intranasal spray vaccine were vaccine effectiveness and safety. Receivers who perceived higher vaccine effectiveness or safety were more likely to recommend it to others (OR, 95%CI: 4.41, 3.24-6.00; 6.11, 4.52-8.27) or prefer it over intramuscular injection after vaccination (OR, 95%CI: 5.94, 4.62-7.65; 8.50, 6.70-10.78). Receivers showed good acceptability and experience toward the intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness and safety were the most concerned aspects, and corresponding publicity and education efforts may help improve vaccine acceptability.

Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems

Poor medication adherence is a pervasive issue with considerable health and socioeconomic consequences. Although the underlying reasons are generally understood, traditional intervention strategies rooted in patient-centric education and empowerment have proved to be prohibitively complex and/or ineffective. Formulating a pharmaceutical in a drug delivery system (DDS) is a promising alternative that can directly mitigate many common impediments to adherence, including frequent dosing, adverse effects and a delayed onset of action. Existing DDSs have already positively influenced patient acceptability and improved rates of adherence across various disease and intervention types. The next generation of systems have the potential to instate an even more radical paradigm shift by, for example, permitting oral delivery of biomacromolecules, allowing for autonomous dose regulation and enabling several doses to be mimicked with a single administration. Their success, however, is contingent on their ability to address the problems that have made DDSs unsuccessful in the past.

Attitude towards Intranasal Vaccines and Psychological Determinants: Effects on the General Population in Northern Italy

Little is known about the use of intranasal vaccines, but some studies have shown that this innovative way of administration is preferred over needle injection as it is considered both less painful and intrusive to the body, equally effective, and associated with fewer side effects. This study aimed to investigate specific psychological determinants (intolerance of uncertainty, persecutory ideation, perceived control, vaccine hesitancy) of attitude toward nasal vaccine delivery. A convenience sample including 700 Italian participants took part in this cross-sectional study and completed an online questionnaire. A structural equation model with a latent variable was performed to study the relationship between psychological variables, vaccine hesitancy, and attitude toward nasal vaccine delivery. The results indicate that both a hesitant attitude toward vaccination (β = 0.20, p = 0.000) and low perceived control (β = -0.20, p = 0.005) may directly increase preference for nasal administration; furthermore, high levels of persecutory ideation may indirectly influence the propensity for intranasal vaccine. These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies could implement nasal vaccines and provide detailed information on these vaccines through informational campaigns. Hesitant individuals with low levels of perceived control could more easily comply with these types of vaccines.

Adenovirus and RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines' perceptions and acceptance among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia: a national survey

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the perception, confidence, hesitancy and acceptance rate of various COVID-19 vaccine types among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Saudi Arabia, a nation with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus experience.

DESIGN

National cross-sectional, pilot-validated questionnaire.

SETTING

Online, self-administered questionnaire among HCWs.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2007 HCWs working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia participated; 1512 (75.3%) participants completed the survey and were included in the analysis.

INTERVENTION

Data were collected through an online survey sent to HCWs during 1-15 November 2020. The main outcome measure was HCW acceptance of COVID-19 candidate vaccines. The associated factors of vaccination acceptance were identified through a logistic regression analysis and via measurement of the level of anxiety, using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 scale.

RESULTS

Among the 1512 HCWs who were included, 62.4% were women, 70.3% were between 21 and 40 years of age, and the majority (62.2%) were from tertiary hospitals. In addition, 59.5% reported knowing about at least one vaccine; 24.4% of the participants were sure about their willingness to receive the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, and 20.9% were willing to receive the RNA BNT162b2 vaccine. However, 18.3% reported that they would refuse to receive the Ad5-vectored vaccine, and 17.9% would refuse the Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine. Factors that influenced the differential readiness of HCWs included their perceptions of the vaccine's efficiency in preventing the infection (33%), their personal preferences (29%) and the vaccine's manufacturing country (28.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness by HCWs of the several COVID-19 candidate vaccines could improve their perceptions and acceptance of vaccination. Reliable sources on vaccine efficiency could improve vaccine uptake, so healthcare authorities should use reliable information to decrease vaccine hesitancy among frontline healthcare providers.

Summary of the NACI systematic review and recommendation on the use of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in HIV-infected individuals

Background

Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all individuals six months of age and older, including those with HIV infection. Prior to this statement, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) stated that live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was contraindicated for all individuals with HIV infection. The objective of this article is to update NACI's guidance on the use of LAIV for HIV-infected individuals.

Methods

A systematic literature review of the use of LAIV in individuals with HIV was undertaken. The Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System was searched for reports of adverse events following vaccination with LAIV in HIV-infected individuals. NACI approved the revised recommendations.

Results

NACI concluded that LAIV is immunogenic in children with HIV, and available data suggest that it is safe, although data were insufficient to detect possible uncommon adverse effects. LAIV may be considered as an option for vaccination of children 2-17 years old who meet the following criteria: 1) receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy for at least four months; 2) CD4 count of 500/µL or greater if age 2-5 years, or of 200/µL or greater if age 6-17 years; and 3) HIV plasma RNA less than 10,000 copies/mL. LAIV remains contraindicated for adults with HIV because of insufficient data. Intramuscular influenza vaccination is considered the standard for children living with HIV by NACI and the Canadian Paediatric & Perinatal HIV/AIDS Research Group, particularly for those without HIV viral load suppression (i.e. plasma HIV RNA is 40 copies/mL or greater). However, if intramuscular (IM) vaccination is not accepted by the patient or substitute decision-maker, LAIV would be reasonable for children meeting the criteria listed above.

Conclusion

LAIV may be considered as an option for annual vaccination of selected children with HIV.

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with the adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase II study

BACKGROUND

Intranasal influenza vaccines may provide protective efficacy by inducing both systemic antibodies and local secretory IgA. Live attenuated intranasal vaccines are not feasible for high-risk groups. A previously constructed inactivated vaccine with adjuvant revealed an association with neurological events in some studies. In this phase II trial, we aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT)-derived from E. coli (LTh(αK)).

METHODS

This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled, double-blind, phase II trial of an intranasal influenza vaccine containing 22.5 μg of the hemagglutinin (HA) antigen of three influenza strains in combination with 2 different LTh(αK) adjuvant doses (group 1: 30 μg; group 2: 45 μg) in subjects 20-70 years old. The control vaccine was 22.5 μg of influenza HA antigen alone (group 3). The vaccine was intranasally administered on days 1 and 8. Serum anti-HA antibody and nasal secretory IgA were measured, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded prevaccination and 29 (±2) days postvaccination.

RESULTS

Of 354 participants randomized in the study, 340 received two vaccine doses. AEs were mostly mild, and there was no discontinuation related to the vaccine. Only a higher frequency of diarrhea after the first dose was noted among group 2 (11.5%) than among group 3 (2.8%), and there was no significant difference after the second dose. The three groups had comparable serum anti-HA antibody immunogenicity. However, the adjuvanted vaccines induced greater mucosal IgA antibody production than the control vaccine. In a subgroup analysis, group 1 participants achieved adequate immunogenicity among both 20- to 60- and 61- to 70-year-old participants.

CONCLUSION

The intranasal influenza vaccine adjuvanted with LTh(αK) is generally safe and could provide systemic and local antibody responses. Adjuvanted vaccines were significantly more immunogenic than the nonadjuvanted control vaccine in mucosal immunity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03784885.