Does Increased Coefficient of Friction of Highly Porous Metal Increase Initial Stability at the Acetabular Interface?

Irregular porous titanium enhances implant stability and bone ingrowth in an intra-articular ovine model

Two commercially available porous coatings, Gription and Porocoat, were compared for the first time in a challenging intra-articular, weight-bearing, ovine model. Gription has evolved from Porocoat and has higher porosity, coefficient of friction, and microtextured topography, which are expected to enhance bone ingrowth. Cylindrical implants were press-fit into the weight-bearing regions of ovine femoral condyles and bone ingrowth and fixation strength evaluated 4, 8, and 16 weeks postoperatively. Biomechanical push-out tests were performed on lateral femoral condyles (LFCs) to evaluate the strength of the bone-implant interface. Bone ingrowth was assessed in medial femoral condyles (MFCs) as well as implants retrieved from LFCs following biomechanical testing using backscattered electron microscopy and histology. By 16 weeks, Gription-coated implants exhibited higher force (2455 ± 1362 vs. 1002 ± 1466 N; p = 0.046) and stress (12.60 ± 6.99 vs. 5.14 ± 7.53 MPa; p = 0.046) at failure, and trended towards higher stiffness (11,510 ± 7645 vs. 5010 ± 8374 N/mm; p = 0.061) and modulus of elasticity (591 ± 392 vs. 256 ± 431 MPa; p = 0.061). A strong, positive correlation was detected between bone ingrowth in LFC implants and failure force (r = 0.93, p < 10^-13 ). By 16 weeks, bone ingrowth in Gription-coated implants in MFCs was 10.50 ± 6.31% compared to 5.88 ± 2.77% in Porocoat (p = 0.095). Observations of the bone-implant interface, made following push-out testing, showed more bony material consistently adhered to Gription compared to Porocoat at all three time points. Gription provided superior fixation strength and bone ingrowth by 16 weeks.

Clinical Application and Biological Functionalization of Different Surface Coatings in Artificial Joint Prosthesis: A Comprehensive Research Review

With advances in materials science and biology, there have been continuing innovations in the field of artificial joint prostheses. Cementless prostheses have the advantages of long service life, easy revision, and good initial stability and are widely used in artificial joint replacement. Coatings are the key to cementless prostheses and are at the heart of their excellent functionality. This article mainly studies the clinical application of hydroxyapatite (HA) coating, standard porous coating represented by Porocoat coating, and new high-porosity coating represented by Gription coating. The clinical application and biological functionalization of different artificial joint prosthesis surface coatings are clarified, and it provides a reference for the clinical selection and development of different prosthesis surface coating materials.

Determinants of the primary stability of cementless acetabular cup implants: A 3D finite element study

Primary stability of cementless implants is crucial for the surgical success and long-term stability. However, primary stability is difficult to quantify in vivo and the biomechanical phenomena occurring during the press-fit insertion of an acetabular cup (AC) implant are still poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the cortical and trabecular bone Young's moduli E_c and E_t, the interference fit IF and the sliding friction coefficient of the bone-implant interface μ on the primary stability of an AC implant. For each parameter combination, the insertion of the AC implant into the hip cavity and consequent pull-out are simulated with a 3D finite element model of a human hemi-pelvis. The primary stability is assessed by determining the polar gap and the maximum pull-out force. The polar gap increases along with all considered parameters. The pull-out force shows a continuous increase with E_c and E_t and a non-linear variation as a function of μ and IF is obtained. For μ > 0.6 and IF > 1.4 mm the primary stability decreases, and a combination of smaller μ and IF lead to a better fixation. Based on the patient's bone stiffness, optimal combinations of μ and IF can be identified. The results are in good qualitative agreement with previous studies and provide a better understanding of the determinants of the AC implant primary stability. They suggest a guideline for the optimal choice of implant surface roughness and IF based on the patient's bone quality.

Off-the-shelf 3D printed titanium cups in primary total hip arthroplasty

Three-dimensional (3D)-printed titanium cups used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were developed to combine the benefits of a low elastic modulus with a highly porous surface. The aim was to improve local vascularization and bony ingrowth, and at the same time to reduce periprosthetic stress shielding. Additive manufacturing, starting with a titanium alloy powder, allows serial production of devices with large interconnected pores (trabecular titanium), overcoming the drawbacks of tantalum and conventional manufacturing techniques. To date, 3D-printed cups have achieved dependable clinical and radiological outcomes with results not inferior to conventional sockets and with good rates of osseointegration. No mechanical failures and no abnormal ion release and biocompatibility warnings have been reported. In this review, we focused on the manufacturing technique, cup features, clinical outcomes, open questions and future developments of off-the-shelf 3D-printed titanium shells in THA.

Early results of a high friction surface coated uncemented socket in revision hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Revision hip arthroplasty with high friction trabecular metal sockets has resulted in good medium-term results. Many manufacturers have therefore introduced higher friction coatings to their implants to meet a growing demand for similar implants. The Pinnacle Gription was introduced in 2007 as an evolution of the standard Pinnacle socket. This study aimed to assess the early results of this socket in a revision setting.

METHODS

Between August 2009 and December 2016, the Gription socket was used in 146 revision hip replacements. The mean age was 63 (19-88) years. Defects were classified as Paprosky Grade 2 in 71(2A [28], 2B [19], 2C [24]) and grade 3 in 20 (3A [18], 3B [2]). Bearing combinations were ceramic-on-ceramic in 23, metal-on-polyethylene in 71, ceramic-on-polyethylene in 52. Screws were used in 112 cases, impaction bone grafting in 34 and metal augments in 1 case. Radiographs were analysed for progressive radiolucent lines and migration.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 43.5 (range 25-62) months. There were 6 re-revisions (2 for deep infection, 2 for recurrent dislocation and 2 for aseptic loosening). None of the other cases had evidence of socket migration or progressive radiolucent lines. There were no intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fractures. The crude survivorship for all-cause failure was 95.8% and the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 98.6%. at 43.5 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest reported series of Gription socket use in revision arthroplasty and demonstrates encouraging early results. We therefore advocate the continued cautious use of this implant.

Influence of outer geometry on primary stability for uncemented acetabular shells in developmental dysplasia of the hip

Excellent primary stability of uncemented acetabular shells is essential to obtain successful clinical outcomes. However, in the case of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), aseptic loosening may be induced by instability due to a decrease of the contact area between the acetabular shell and host bone. The aim of this study was to assess the primary stability of two commercially-available acetabular shells, hemispherical and hemielliptical, in normal and DDH models. Synthetic bone was reamed using appropriate surgical reamers for each reaming condition (normal acetabular model). The normal acetabular model was also cut diagonally at 40° to create a dysplasia model. Stability of the acetabular components was evaluated by the lever-out test. In the normal acetabular model conditions, the maximum primary stabilities of hemispherical and hemielliptical shells were observed in the 1-mm under- and 1-mm over-reamed conditions, respectively, and the resulting stabilities were comparable. The lateral defect in the dysplasia model had an adverse effect on the primary stabilities of the two designs. The lever-out moment of the hemielliptical acetabular shell was 1.4 times greater than that of the hemispherical acetabular shell in the dysplasia model. The hemispherical shell is useful for the normal acetabular condition, and the hemielliptical shell for the severe dysplasia condition, in the context of primary stability.

Comparison of Test Setups for the Experimental Evaluation of the Primary Fixation Stability of Acetabular Cups

Sufficient primary fixation stability is the basis for the osseointegration of cementless acetabular cups. Several test methods have been established for determining the tilting moment of acetabular press-fit cups, which is a measure for their primary fixation stability. The central aim of this experimental study was to show the differences between the commonly used lever-out test method (Method 1) and the edge-load test method (Method 2) in which the cup insert is axially loaded (1 kN) during the tilting process with respect to the parameters, tilting moment, and interface stiffness. Therefore, using a biomechanical cup block model, a press-fit cup design with a macro-structured surface was pushed into three cavity types (intact, moderate superior defect, and two-point-pinching cavity) made of 15 pcf and 30 pcf polyurethane foam blocks (n = 3 per cavity and foam density combination), respectively. Subsequently, the acetabular cup was disassembled from the three artificial bone cavities using the lever-out and the edge-load test method. Tilting moments determined with Method 1 ranged from 2.72 ± 0.29 Nm to 49.08 ± 1.50 Nm, and with Method 2, they ranged from 41.40 ± 1.05 Nm to 112.86 ± 5.29 Nm. In Method 2, larger areas of abrasion were observed in the artificial bone cavity compared to Method 1. This indicates increased shear forces at the implant–bone interface in the former method. In conclusion, Method 1 simulates the technique used by orthopedic surgeons to assess the correct fit of the trial cup, while Method 2 simulates the tilting of the cup in the acetabular bone cavity under in situ loading with the hip resultant force.

Deeper Central Reaming May Enhance Initial Acetabular Shell Fixation

Background

The initial stability of press-fit acetabular components is partially determined by the reaming technique. Nonhemispherical (NHS) acetabular shells, which have a larger radius at the rim than the dome, often require larger reaming preparations than the same-sized hemispherical (HS) shells. Furthermore, deeper central reaming may provide a more stable press fit. Using a reproducible, in vitro protocol, we compared initial shell stability under different reaming techniques with HS and NHS acetabular components.

Methods

Cavities for 54-mm NHS and 56-mm HS acetabular components were premachined in 20-pcf Sawbones blocks. Acetabular cavities included diameters of 54, 55, “54+,” and “55+”. “+” indicates a cavity with a 2-mm smaller diameter that is 2-mm deeper. A 4750N statically applied force seated shells to a height that was comparable with shell height after an orthopaedic surgeon’s manual impaction. Force required to dislodge shells was assessed via a straight torque-out with a linear load.

Results

Increased preparation depth (+) was associated with deeper shell seating in all groups. Deeper central reaming increased required lever-out force for all groups. Overall, HS and NHS implants prepared with 55 + preparation had the highest lever-out forces, although this was not significantly higher than those with 54+.

Conclusions

In 20-pcf Sawbones, representing dense bone, overreaming depth by 1-mm improved initial seating measurements. In both HS and NHS acetabular shells, seating depth and required lever-out force were higher in the “+” category. It is unclear, however, whether a decreased diameter ream increased seating stability (55+ vs 54+). Clinically, this deeper central reaming technique may help initial acetabular stability.

Time-dependent Viscoelastic Response of Acetabular Bone and Implant Seating during Dynamic Implantation of Press-fit Cups

Deformation of an acetabular cup implant during cementless implantation is indicative of the radial compressive forces, and such of the initial implant fixation strength. Stress relaxation in the surrounding bone tissue following implantation could reduce the deformation of the cup and thus primary implant fixation. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the early shape change of the implanted cup immediately after implantation with different press-fit levels and whether recording the force during cup impaction can be used to estimate initial cup fixation. Cup implantations into porcine acetabulae (n=10) were performed using a drop tower. The force induced by the drop weight and cup seating after each impact was recorded. Deformation of the implanted cup was determined with strain gauges over a period of 10min. Lever-out torques were measured to assess the initial fixation strength. Stress relaxation in the bone caused a reduction in cup deformation of 13.52±4.06% after 1min and 29.34±5.11% after 10min. The fixation strength increased with a higher force magnitude during impaction (R_s²=0.810, p=0.037). Reduction of the radial compressive forces due to stress relaxation of the surrounding bone should be considered during press-fit cup implantation in order to compensate for the reduced fixation strength over time. In addition, recording the implantation force could help to estimate initial fixation strength.

Fixation Stability of Uncemented Acetabular Cups With Respect to Different Bone Defect Sizes

BACKGROUND

In total hip arthroplasty, acetabular press-fit cups require a proper bone stock for sufficient primary implant fixation. The presence of acetabular bone defects compromises the primary fixation stability of acetabular press-fit cups. The aim of the present study is to determine the fixation stability of a cementless acetabular cup regarding standardized bone defects in an experimental setup.

METHODS

An acetabular defect model was developed and transferred to a biomechanical cup-block model. The lack of superior cup coverage was divided into 4 stages of superior rim loss (33%, 50%, 67%, and 83%) in the anterior-posterior direction and into 4 stages of mediolateral wall absence (11%, 22%, 33%, and 50%). This resulted in 11 different defect cavities, which were compared to the intact cavity in push-in and lever-out tests of one press-fit cup design (56 mm outer diameter). Thereby, push-in force, lever-out moment, lever-out angle, and interface stiffness were determined.

RESULTS

The determined lever-out moments range from 15.53 ± 1.38 Nm (intact cavity) to 1.37 ± 0.54 Nm (83%/50% defect). Smaller defects (33%/11%, 33%/22%, and 50%/11%) reduce the lever-out moments by an average of 33.9% ± 2.8%.

CONCLUSION

The lack of mediolateral acetabular coverage of 50% was assessed as critical for cementless cup fixation, whereby the contact zone between implant and bone in the defect is lost. A lack of 20% to 30% mediolateral coverage appears to be acceptable for press-fit cup fixation in the presence of primary stability. A defect of 50%/50% was identified as the threshold for using additional fixation methods.

Comparison of the Primary Stability of Porous Tantalum and Titanium Acetabular Revision Constructs

Adequate primary stability of the acetabular revision construct is necessary for long-term implant survival. The difference in primary stability between tantalum and titanium components is unclear. Six composite hemipelvises with an acetabular defect were implanted with a tantalum augment and cup, using cement fixation between cup and augment. Relative motion was measured at cup/bone, cup/augment and bone/augment interfaces at three load levels; the results were compared to the relative motion measured at the same interfaces of a titanium cup/augment construct of identical dimensions, also implanted into composite bone. The implants showed little relative motion at all load levels between the augment and cup. At the bone/augment and bone/cup interfaces the titanium implants showed less relative motion than tantalum at 30% load (p < 0.001), but more relative motion at 50% (p = n.s.) and 100% (p < 0001) load. The load did not have a significant effect at the augment/cup interface (p = 0.086); it did have a significant effect on relative motion of both implant materials at bone/cup and bone/augment interfaces (p < 0.001). All interfaces of both constructs displayed relative motion that should permit osseointegration. Tantalum, however, may provide a greater degree of primary stability at higher loads than titanium. The clinical implication is yet to be seen

Two Different Methods to Measure the Stability of Acetabular Implants: A Comparison Using Artificial Acetabular Models

The total number of total hip arthroplasties is increasing every year, and approximately 10% of these surgeries are revisions. New implant design and surgical techniques are evolving quickly and demand accurate preclinical evaluation. The initial stability of cementless implants is one of the main concerns of these preclinical evaluations. A broad range of initial stability test methods is currently used, which can be categorized into two main groups: Load-to-failure tests and relative micromotion measurements. Measuring relative micromotion between implant and bone is recognized as the golden standard for implant stability testing as this micromotion is directly linked to the long-term fixation of cementless implants. However, specific custom-made set-ups are required to measure this micromotion, with the result that numerous studies opt to perform more straightforward load-to-failure tests. A custom-made micromotion test set-up for artificial acetabular bone models was developed and used to compare load-to-failure (implant push-out test) with micromotion and to assess the influence of bone material properties and press-fit on the implant stability. The results showed a high degree of correlation between micromotion and load-to-failure stability metrics, which indicates that load-to-failure stability tests can be an appropriate estimator of the primary stability of acetabular implants. Nevertheless, micromotions still apply as the golden standard and are preferred when high accuracy is necessary. Higher bone density resulted in an increase in implant stability. An increase of press-fit from 0.7 mm to 1.2 mm did not significantly increase implant stability.

Inferior extended fixation utilizing porous titanium augments improves primary anti-rotational stability of the acetabular component

BACKGROUND

The primary anti-rotational stability is critical to preventing cup tilting failure following revision total hip arthroplasty, but is frequently compromised by severe ischial bone loss. A novel technique of "inferior extended fixation" was introduced by securing a porous metal augment into the deficient ischium. This study evaluated the effect of this technique on primary anti-rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Composite hemipelvis specimens, acetabular components and "lotus" augments were used to simulate total hip arthroplasty surgeries. Three different cementless operative settings of cup implantation were simulated: (1) native ischium without defects; (2) ischium with a defect not reconstructed; (3) ischial defect reconstructed with inferior extended fixation using a lotus augment. Lever-out testing was used to examine primary anti-rotational stability, which was measured as interface stiffness and yield moment.

FINDINGS

Compared with the native ischium setting, the mean interface stiffness decreased by 53.1% in the ischial defect setting (p < 0.001). In the inferior extended fixation setting, the mean value was 110% greater than that in the ischial defect setting (p = 0.014), and comparable to that in the native ischium setting (p = 1). Similar results were observed for the yield moment (declined by 63.1%, p < 0.001; 200% higher, p < 0.001; and p = 0.395; respectively).

INTERPRETATION

In revision total hip arthroplasty with severe ischial defects, inferior extended fixation with a lotus porous titanium augment restores anti-rotational stability of the acetabular component to the level of that with a native ischium, which provides the mechanical environment for bone ingrowth and prevents cup tilting failure.

Dependence of the primary stability of cementless acetabular cup implants on the biomechanical environment

Biomechanical phenomena occurring at the bone–implant interface during the press-fit insertion of acetabular cup implants are still poorly understood. This article presents a nonlinear geometrical two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model aiming at describing the biomechanical behavior of the acetabular cup implant as a function of the bone Young’s modulus Eb, the diametric interference fit ( IF), and the friction coefficient µ. The numerical model was compared with experimental results obtained from an in vitro test, which allows to determine a reference configuration with the parameter set: μ*  = 0.3, [Formula: see text], and IF*  = 1 mm for which the maximal contact pressure tN = 10.7 MPa was found to be localized at the peri-equatorial rim of the acetabular cavity. Parametric studies were carried out, showing that an optimal value of the pull-out force can be defined as a function of μ, Eb, and IF. For the reference configuration, the optimal pull-out force is obtained for μ  = 0.6 (respectively, Eb = 0.35 GPa and IF = 1.4 mm). For relatively low value of µ ( µ < 0.2), the optimal value of IF linearly increases as a function of µ independently of Eb, while for µ > 0.2, the optimal value of IF has a nonlinear dependence on µ and decreases as a function of Eb. The results can be used to help surgeons determine the optimal value of IF in a patient specific manner.

Radiolucency around highly porous sockets and hydroxyapatite-coated porous sockets in total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia

Studies over the past decade have reported that the use of highly porous sockets in total hip arthroplasty (THA) results in osseointegration and long-term implant stability. However, some reports have raised concerns regarding radiographic evidence of poor osseointegration with features of fibrous tissue ingrowth. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic assessments of highly porous sockets with those of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated porous sockets in THA for hip dysplasia (DDH) at least 1 year after surgery. A total of 127 patients (136 hips) were recruited for the study. Of these, 94 patients (101 hips) received highly porous sockets with clustered screws, while 33 patients (35 hips) received HA-coated porous sockets with clustered screws. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two types of sockets. All HA-coated porous sockets were radiographically stable, without radiolucent lines. Fifteen hips had radiolucent lines in two or three DeLee and Charnley zones, accompanied by sclerotic lines along the circumferences of the highly porous sockets. A significant difference in the height of the preoperative osteophyte of the anterior acetabular wall was observed between 86 hips with one or no radiolucent lines and 15 hips with two or three radiolucent lines. In cases of DDH with atrophic bone remodeling pattern, highly porous sockets with multiple screws may be used, while HA-coated porous sockets with clustered screws result in better sealing of the bone–component interface.

Experimental Characterization of the Primary Stability of Acetabular Press-Fit Cups with Open-Porous Load-Bearing Structures on the Surface Layer

Background: Nowadays, hip cups are being used in a wide range of design versions and in an increasing number of units. Their development is progressing steadily. In contrast to conventional methods of manufacturing acetabular cups, additive methods play an increasingly central role in the development progress. Method: A series of eight modified cups were developed on the basis of a standard press-fit cup with a pole flattening and in a reduced version. The surface structures consist of repetitive open-pore load-bearing textural elements aligned right-angled to the cup surface. We used three different types of unit cells (twisted, combined and combined open structures) for constructing of the surface structure. All cups were manufactured using selective laser melting (SLM) of titanium powder (Ti6Al4V). To evaluate the primary stability of the press fit cups in the artificial bone cavity, pull-out and lever-out tests were conducted. All tests were carried out under exact fit conditions. The closed-cell polyurethane (PU) foam, which was used as an artificial bone cavity, was characterized mechanically in order to preempt any potential impact on the test results. Results and conclusions: The pull-out forces as well as the lever moments of the examined cups differ significantly depending on the elementary cells used. The best results in pull-out forces and lever-out moments are shown by the press-fit cups with a combined structure. The results for the assessment of primary stability are related to the geometry used (unit cell), the dimensions of the unit cell, and the volume and porosity responsible for the press fit. Corresponding functional relationships could be identified. The findings show that the implementation of reduced cups in a press-fit design makes sense as part of the development work.

Washing the Femoral Canal Results in More Predictable Seating of a Short, Tapered Femoral Stem

BACKGROUND

It is critical that a femoral rasp be effective in preparing the proximal femur to accept the size and the geometry of the femoral implant at the time of total hip arthroplasty. Short, tapered femoral stems may be at greater risk because they require the preparation of a short femoral region without any reaming. We undertook a study to determine the effect on implant seating in femora that were prepared by rasping alone with those that were rasped and the canal was washed with saline at the time of cementless THA with a short, tapered femoral implant.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative, intraoperative, and radiographic data on 170 consecutive patients undergoing a primary THA using a short, taper, uncemented metaphyseal-filling stem. The femur was prepared using a rasp-only technique. In the initial 99 patients, the canal was rasped, but not washed (group 1). In the subsequent 71 patients, the canal was rasped and before implant insertion the canal was washed with 100 cc of normal saline to remove all loose cancellous bone (group 2). Intraoperatively, the distance between the calcar cut and the rasp and subsequently, the calcar cut and the implant was measured. We defined a difference of more than 2 mm between the seating of the rasp and the final implant as a clinically significant mismatch.

RESULTS

Overall, a clinically significant mismatch occurred in 50% (49/99) of cases in group 1 and 15% (11/71) in group 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis corrected for preoperative, intraoperative, and radiographic measurements showed that washing significantly decreased the mismatch between the rasp and the implant (odds ratio, 5.32; confidence interval, 2.10-13.73; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although the present rasp design is sufficient to create the geometric space for this short, metaphyseal stem, it does not adequately remove the bone debris to ensure reproducible seating of the implant. Washing the femoral metaphysis with saline to remove bone debris, after rasping and before inserting the final implant, significantly decreased the mismatch between seating of the final rasp and the implant in this cementless short, metaphyseal-filling, taper design stem. Level of Evidence III.

Bioactive materials driven primary stability on titanium biocomposites

The Ti6Al4V alloy constitutes an alternative choice to the most common metal-polymer solutions for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to good biocompatibility, optimal mechanical properties and high load bearing capacity. However, as Ti6Al4V is not bioactive in its conventional form, hydroxyapatite (HAp) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) have been widely used as coatings of metal prostheses due to their osteogenic properties and ability to form strong bonds with bone tissue. A promising approach consists in creating a bioactive surface metal matrix composite Ti6Al4V+β-TCP or Ti6Al4V+HAp, obtained by hot pressing (HP) of powders. In this work, the tribological performance of Ti6Al4V+β-TCP and Ti6Al4V+HAp composites is studied to evaluate the frictional response and surface damage representative of prosthesis implantation, key factors in bone fixation. Biocomposites with 10vol% β-TCP and 10vol% Hap, as well as base titanium alloy, were prepared by HP with two surface finishing conditions - polished (Ra=0.3-0.5μm) and sandblasted (Ra=2.1-2.5μm) - for tribological testing against bovine cortical bone tissue. The static friction increases with surface roughness (from 0.20 to 0.60), whereas the kinetic regime follows an inverse trend for the biocomposites. In contrast with current knowledge, this study shows that an implant design solution based on Ti6Al4V+β-TCP or Ti6Al4V+HAp biocomposites with polished surfaces results in an improved primary stability of implants, when compared to traditional rough surfaces. Moreover, it is also expected that the secondary stability will improve due to the adhesion between bone and HAp/β-TCP, increasing the overall stability of the implant.