Perception of Risk: A Poll of American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members

Perceived Risk of Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Brazilian Hip Society Survey

BACKGROUND

As total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become more common and widely available, candidates now often present with multiple risk factors that increase the risk of complications, directly impacting the cost of surgery and provider compensation. The present study was designed to better understand the impact of these factors and the perceptions of hip surgeons in Brazil.

METHODS

All 880 full members of the Brazilian Hip Society (SBQ) were invited to complete an online questionnaire on preoperative risk factors, adapted from the previous American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons survey. Statistical analyses of survey response data were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 398 responses were received (45.2% of SBQ members). Most (81.7%) work in high-complexity hospitals; 46% have more than 15 years of experience in THA; and 30.2% perform more than 100 THAs/year (47% perform 40 to 100/year). Overall, 56.5% restrict THA eligibility based on modifiable risk factors: 76.6% view malnutrition and 65.8% view poorly controlled diabetes as factors precluding THA; most (89.2%) recommend waiting six to 24 months after bariatric surgery. Although 59.5% of respondents turn down candidates who abuse alcohol, 80.9% are willing to operate on smokers and 75.6% on opioid users. Advanced age was not a relevant factor for 87.2, and 71.1% perceive risk as equal in men and women. Among respondents who restrict THA eligibility, 78% do so based on personal experience or literature, while 32.6% follow the opinion of the patient's primary clinician. 90.4% believe risk-based compensation would expand access to THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to their peers in Latin America, Asia, Europe, and the United States, SBQ members have a largely similar perception of restrictions to performing THA, but are more willing to operate on smokers and more likely to defer THA in postbariatric patients. Nearly all favor adjusting surgeon compensation to take patient risk factors into account.

How Do Bundled Payment Initiatives Account for Differences in Patient Risk Profiles? A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Bundled payments (BPs) are increasingly being adopted to enable the delivery of high-value care. For BPs to reach their goals, accounting for differences in patient risk profiles (PRPs) predictive of spending is crucial. However, insight is lacking into how this is done in practice. This study aims to fill this gap.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of literature published until February 2024, focusing on BP initiatives in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. We collected data on initiatives' general characteristics, details on the (stated reasons for) approaches used to account for PRP, and suggested improvements. Patterns within and across initiatives were analyzed using extraction tables and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We included 95 documents about 17 initiatives covering various conditions and procedures. Across these initiatives, patient exclusion (n = 14) and risk adjustment (n = 12) of bundle prices were the most applied methods, whereas risk stratification was less common (n = 3). Most authors stated mitigating perverse incentives as the primary reason for PRP accounting. Commonly used risk factors included comorbidities and sociodemographic and condition/procedure-specific characteristics. Our findings show that, despite increasingly sophisticated approaches over time, key areas for improvement included better alignment with value and equity goals, and enhanced data availability for more comprehensive corrections for relevant risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

BP initiatives use various approaches to account for PRP differences. Despite a trend toward more sophisticated approaches, most remain basic with room for improvement. To enable cross-initiative comparisons and learning, it is important that stakeholders involved in BPs be transparent about the (reasons for) design choices made.

Two Decades Since the Unequal Treatment Report: The State of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Elective Total Hip and Knee Replacement Use

ABSTRACT

Published in 2003 by the Institute of Medicine, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care placed an unprecedented spotlight on disparities in the U.S. health-care system. In the 2 decades since the publication of that landmark report, disparities continue to be prevalent and remain an important significant national concern. This article synthesizes the evolution, current state, and future of racial and ethnic disparities in the use of elective total joint replacement surgeries. We contextualize our impressions with respect to the recommendations of the Unequal Treatment Report.

Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients From Distressed Communities Participate in Sports and Physical Activities at Lower Rates

BACKGROUND

Patients often desire to participate in sports following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but may be limited functionally and also socioeconomically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the sports participation rates in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients based on their Distressed Communities Index (DCI).

METHODS

Patients who underwent TJA at our institution from 2015 to 2020 were surveyed on sports/physical activity participation before and after TJA. In total, 2,335 patients were surveyed: 780 (33.4%) underwent THA, 1,158 (49.6%) underwent TKA, and 397 (17.0%) underwent both THA and TKA. Patients were grouped based on their DCI score into either the prosperous (N = 1,126), comfortable (N = 634), or mid-tier/at-risk/distressed (N = 575) groups. Data were correlated with demographic and outcome scores.

RESULTS

Participation rates were 85.3, 84.2, and 77.7% at 5 years before TJA in the prosperous, comfortable, and mid-tier/at-risk/distressed groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Participation rates were 74.2, 70.7, and 66.6%, at a mean of 4.0 years postoperatively (P = 0.004). For all three groups, the most popular sports were recreational walking, swimming, cycling, and golf, and there were significantly lower preoperative and postoperative levels of participation in these physical activities in the more distressed groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that a DCI of 3 or higher significantly predicted the ability to participate in sports (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

While sports participation rates are high in most TJA patients, participation is decreased compared to 5 years preoperatively, transitions to low-impact activities, and patients who are from more distressed communities report lower sports participation rates.

ASA Class Is a Stronger Predictor of Early Revision Risk Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty than BMI

Background

Although there is a known correlation between obesity and revision risk following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an ongoing debate regarding the appropriateness of denying TKA solely based on the body mass index (BMI) of a patient. Our aim was to determine whether a patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class predicts their risks of early all-cause revision and revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary TKA, independent of their BMI.

Methods

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) were obtained regarding all patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis in Australia from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. Estimated hazard ratios of all-cause revision and revision for PJI, as well as predicted risks of revision within 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years, as a function of patient ASA class and BMI, were calculated with use of multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A total of 274,786 primary TKAs (54.5% female; mean age, 68.3 years) were included in the study, of which 5,401 were revised during the study period. Compared with BMI, ASA class was a stronger predictor of the risks of all-cause revision and revision for PJI following primary TKA. Patients with an ASA class of 3 to 4 had higher risks of all-cause revision and revision for PJI at multiple time points after TKA compared with patients with an ASA class of 1 to 2, regardless of BMI.

Conclusions

Although ASA class and BMI are theoretically interrelated variables, we found that a patient's ASA class was more strongly associated with their risks of early all-cause revision and revision for PJI following primary TKA than their BMI. Employing a BMI threshold in isolation when assessing fitness for TKA may be inappropriate, and surgeons should give greater weight to the other medical comorbidities and general perioperative fitness of the patient. Patients with poorly controlled comorbidities should be referred for medical optimization prior to TKA.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Community-Level Social Vulnerability and Hip and Knee Joint Replacement Surgery Receipt Among Medicare Enrollees With Arthritis

OBJECTIVES

(1) Explore associations between county minority health social vulnerability index (MH-SVI) and total joint replacement (TJR), and (2) assess associations by individual-level race/ethnicity.

BACKGROUND

An expanded understanding of relevant social determinants of health is essential to inform policies and practices that promote equitable access to hip and knee TJR.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of Medicare enrollees. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data were linked with MH-SVI. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the odds of TJR according to the MH-SVI quartile in which enrollees resided. A total of 10,471,413 traditional Medicare enrollees in 2018 aged 67 years or older with arthritis. The main outcome was enrollee primary TJR during hospitalization. The main exposure was the MH-SVI (composite and 6 themes) for the county of enrollee residence. Results were stratified by enrollee race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander (AANHPI), Black or African American (Black), and Hispanic enrollees comparatively had 26%-41% lower odds of receiving TJR than White enrollees. Residing in counties within the highest quartile of composite and socioeconomic status vulnerability measures were associated with lower TJR overall and by race/ethnicity. Residing in counties with increased medical vulnerability for Black and White enrollees, housing type and transportation vulnerability for AANHPI and Hispanic enrollees, minority status and language theme for AANHPI enrollees, and household composition vulnerability for White enrollees were also associated with lower TJR.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of social vulnerability were associated with lower TJR. However, the association varied by individual race/ethnicity. Implementing multisectoral strategies is crucial for ensuring equitable access to care.

Perception of Perioperative Risk for Arthroplasty Patients: A Poll of Chinese Orthopaedic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Informed by the precedent of an American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) survey, where 95% of participants reported instigating modifications to preoperative risk factors, this study appraised the approach of Chinese arthroplasty surgeons toward patients who had modifiable risks.

METHODS

An adaptation of the AAHKS survey tool for a Chinese cohort was undertaken. The survey queried 600 Chinese Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons members on whether the perception of unoptimized medical comorbidities and socioeconomic elements affects the propensity to offer surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Out of the distributed surveys, 150 responses were received, culminating in a response rate of 25%. The data illustrate that 98.7% of Chinese surgeons practice restrictions on arthroplasty access for patients who have modifiable risk factors, with notable frequencies for malnutrition (93.3%), anemia (91.3%), recent hyaluronic acid injections (within one month, 88.7%), and corticosteroid injections (within 3 months, 74.7%). Assessment criteria ahead of surgery included limitations such as a body mass index under 40 (47.3%), requirements for smoking cessation (57.3%), an acceptable hemoglobin A1c level (95.3%), and a dependent fasting blood glucose level (88%). Moreover, 87.3% of respondents endorsed the need for additional interventions for certain socioeconomically disadvantaged patients to achieve successful outcomes. A majority of respondents (94.7%) believed that more equitable access to care, facilitated by better-adjusted payment methodologies, could enhance patient outcomes. Current payment schemes were also perceived by a majority to potentially compromise outcomes for patients who have inadequate social support (80.7%), low socioeconomic status (67.3%), and those lacking insurance (72.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of the almost 99% response rate in addressing modifiable risk factors prior to arthroplasty aligns closely with the reported practices in the AAHKS survey. These findings underscore the shared valuation of preoperative risk factor optimization by Chinese and American arthroplasty surgeons, notwithstanding divergent healthcare system structures.

The Use of Telehealth to Improve Office Efficiency and Health Care Access Among Patients Being Evaluated for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients being evaluated for revision total joint arthroplasty (RTJA) are often referred to tertiary care centers, which may decrease their access to adequate health care and overburden these health care systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of RTJA patient evaluation via telehealth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of patients newly evaluated for a symptomatic TJA by two academic surgeons during a 1-year period. Clinical records, radiographs, and laboratory values were reviewed to determine whether the patient was indicated for RTJA. Efficiency was determined by calculating the percentage of patients who could have been adequately evaluated with telehealth. We then used the modalities required for diagnosis in each RTJA case to determine the feasibility of evaluating such patients through telehealth.

RESULTS

Of the 381 patients evaluated for RTJA candidacy, 154 (40.4%) were indicated for revision surgery. All 152 patients evaluated for possible hip revision could have been evaluated and diagnosed via telehealth, demonstrating a telehealth efficiency of 100%. Of 229 patients evaluated for possible knee revision, 183 were able to be evaluated and diagnosed via telehealth. The 46 remaining patients were indicated for revision secondary to instability, which would require an in-office examination for diagnosis. The efficiency of telehealth for potential knee revision patients was 79.9%.

CONCLUSION

Telehealth may be useful in evaluating patients with symptomatic TJA. It may increase the efficiency of in-office evaluations and reduce potential barriers to health care access. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Comparable performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting readmission and complications following total joint arthroplasty with external validation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to use Machine Learning (ML) to construct a risk calculator for patients who undergo Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) on the basis of New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data and externally validate the calculator on a single TJA center.

METHODS

Seven ML algorithms, i.e., logistic regression, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting (Xg Boost), random forest (RF) classifier, support vector machine, and single and a five-layered neural network were trained on the derivation cohort. Models were trained on 68% of data, validated on 15%, tested on 15%, and externally validated on 2% of the data from a single arthroplasty center.

RESULTS

Validation of the models showed that the RF classifier performed best in terms of 30-d mortality AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic) 0.78, 30-d readmission (AUROC 0.61) and 90-d composite complications (AUROC 0.73) amongst the test set. Additionally, Xg Boost was found to be the best predicting model for 90-d readmission and 90-d composite complications (AUC 0.73). External validation demonstrated that models achieved similar AUROCs to the test set although variation occurred in top model performance for 90-d composite complications and readmissions between our test and external validation set.

CONCLUSION

This was the first study to investigate the use of ML to create a predictive risk calculator from state-wide data and then externally validate it with data from a single arthroplasty center. Discrimination between best performing ML models and between the test set and the external validation set are comparable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Assessment of Medical and Social Risk Factors Before Arthroplasty in Argentina: A Poll of Argentinian Hip and Knee Association (ACARO) Members

BACKGROUND

Assessment of risk factors is crucial for lowering complication rates and costs of hip and knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to assess if members of the Argentinian Hip and Knee Association (ACARO) are influenced by such risk factors when planning surgery.

METHODS

In 2022, a survey was distributed as an electronically based questionnaire to 370 members of the ACARO. A descriptive analysis was performed on 166 proper answers (44.9%).

RESULTS

There were 68% of the respondents who were specialists in joint arthroplasty and 32% practiced general orthopedics. A large number had large volumes at private hospitals without service/residents and 48.2% had been in practice for more than 15 years. Of the responding surgeons, 99% routinely performed a preoperative reversible risk factors evaluation that considered diabetes, malnutrition, weight, and smoking, and 95% canceled/postponed the surgery for abnormalities. Malnutrition was important for 79% of the polled with blood albumin being used by 69.3%. Fall risk assessment was performed by 60.2% of the surgeons. Only 44% of the surgeons felt free to choose the implant for the arthroplasty, possibly because 69.9% work for a capitated system. Important delays for surgery were reported by 63.9 and 84.3% had waiting lists. 74.7% of the polled noted physical or psychological deterioration during such delays.

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic factors firmly impact on the accessibility to arthroplasty in Argentina. Despite these barriers, the qualitative analysis of this poll let us demonstrate greater awareness of preoperative risk factors, especially diabetes as the most reported comorbidity.

Limiting Factors for Indication of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Chile: The International Perception of Risk Initiative

BACKGROUND

An aging population with a resultant higher incidence of osteoarthritis have increased the need for total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) worldwide. The purpose of this study was to explore what medical and social risk factors are considered relevant by Chilean orthopaedic surgeons in decisions regarding indications for THA or TKA.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was sent to 165 hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons who were members of the Chilean Orthopedics and Traumatology Society. From a total of 165 surgeons, 128 (78%) completed the survey. The questionnaire included demographic data, place of work, and inquired about medical and socioeconomic factors that could affect surgical indications.

RESULTS

Factors that limited indications for elective THA/TKA included body mass index (81%), elevated hemoglobin A1c (92%), lack of social support network (58%), and low socioeconomic status (40%). Most respondents made decisions based on personal experience or literature review rather than hospital or departmental pressures. Of the respondents, 64% believe that some patient populations would benefit from better care if payment systems adjusted for their socioeconomic risk factors.

CONCLUSION

In Chile, limitations regarding the indication for THA/TKA are most influenced by the presence of modifiable medical risk factors such as obesity, uncompensated diabetes, or malnutrition. We believe that the reason surgeons limit surgeries for such individuals is to promote better clinical outcomes, and not in response to pressure from paying entities. However, low socioeconomic status was perceived to impair the ability to achieve good clinical outcomes by 40% of the surgeons.

Comparing surgeon perception to publicly reported data using NSQIP

Background

Past studies have demonstrated that surgeons' perceptions of their own postsurgical complications may not be accurate. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database is a nationally validated, risk-adjusted, outcomes-based program created to measure and improve the quality of surgical care. Using information acquired through survey data, the purpose of this study is to determine how surgeons' perceptions of their own postoperative complications rates compare to the NSQIP database that tracks these outcome metrics.

Hypothesis/purpose

We hypothesize that surgeons underestimate their rates of morbidity, readmission, and reoperation within thirty days postoperatively when compared to NSQIP data.

Study design

Data elements such as perceived morbidity, readmission, and reoperation were collected through surveys distributed at a large level one trauma center. Survey respondents were asked how their rates compared to their peers and physician survey responses were then compared to institutional NSQIP data.

Results

87.5% of surgeons underestimated their rates of morbidity, 35.4% underestimated their rates of readmission, 22.9% underestimated their rates of reoperation. When comparing themselves to their departmental averages, 57.78% accurately estimated their morbidity rates, 75.56% accurately estimated readmission rates, and 86.67% accurately estimated reoperation rates.

Conclusion

Surgeons are poor predictors of individual 30-day postoperative complication rates including morbidity, readmission, and reoperation. However, surgeons are more accurate in estimating these same outcomes when asked to compare to the average of their department.

Perception of Perioperative Risk for Arthroplasty Patients: A Poll of Indian Orthopedic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

A survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) reported that 95% of respondents attempted to modify risk factors prior to arthroplasty. This study investigated Indian arthroplasty surgeons' approach to patients who have modifiable risk factors.

METHODS

The AAHKS survey tool was adapted for Indian surgeons and distributed to the membership of the Indian Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons and Indian Arthroplasty Association via a Survey Monkey. A total of 92 survey responses were received, representing a response rate of 12%.

RESULTS

Overall, 87% of respondents restricted access to arthroplasty surgery for patients who have modifiable risk factors, but only 51% of respondents reported delays or restricted treatment because of risk factors. Respondents reported that financial implications were more likely to delay or restrict treatment in 97% and social/family reasons in 66%. Poor diabetic control (81%), previous infection (57%), and malnutrition/hypoalbuminemia (47%) were the most frequent modifiable risk factors. There were 82% of surgeons reporting that the patient's socioeconomic status influenced treatment including: 71% of patients who have low socioeconomic status, 57% who do not have insurance, and 45% who have limited social supports. Most surgeons (92%) reported that funding influenced the type of care provided and the choice of implants.

CONCLUSION

Over 97% of Indian arthroplasty surgeons thought socioeconomic factors impaired access to orthopaedic treatment. Only half the surgeons restricted access for comorbidities and these were more often related to infection risks and diabetes. These findings contrast dramatically to the practice patterns of American AAHKS members.

"I Often Feel Conflicted in Denying Surgery": Perspectives of Orthopaedic Surgeons on Body Mass Index Thresholds for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Use of a patient body mass index (BMI) eligibility threshold for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is controversial. A strict BMI criterion may reduce surgical complication rates, but over-restrict access to effective osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. Factors that influence orthopaedic surgeons' use of BMI thresholds are unknown. We aimed to identify and explore orthopaedic surgeons' perspectives regarding patient BMI eligibility thresholds for TJA.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, online qualitative survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons who conduct hip and/or knee TJA in the United States. Survey questions were open-ended, and responses were collected anonymously. Survey data were coded and analyzed in an iterative, systematic process to identify predominant themes.

RESULTS

Forty-five surveys were completed. Respondents were 54.3 ± 12.4 years old (range, 34 to 75 years), practiced in 22 states, and had 21.2 ± 13.3 years (range, 2 to 44 years) of surgical experience. Twelve factors influencing BMI threshold use by orthopaedic surgeons were identified: (1) evidence interpretation, (2) personal experiences, (3) difficulty of surgery, (4) professional ramifications, (5) ethics and biases, (6) health-system policies and performance metrics, (7) surgical capacity and resources, (8) patient body fat distribution, (9) patient self-advocacy, (10) control of decision-making in the clinical encounter, (11) expectations for demonstrated weight loss, and (12) research and innovation gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

Multilevel, complex factors underlie BMI threshold use for TJA eligibility. Addressing identified factors at the patient, surgeon, and health-system levels should be considered to optimally balance complication avoidance with improving access to life-enhancing surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study may influence how orthopaedic surgeons think about their own practices and how they approach patients and consider surgical eligibility.

A Multilingual Chatbot Can Effectively Engage Arthroplasty Patients with Limited English Proficiency

BACKGROUND

In the United States, English language proficiency is widely accepted as a key social determinant of health. For patients with limited English proficiency (LEP), language barriers can make the delivery of perioperative instructions challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a multilingual chatbot could effectively engage LEP patients and improve their outcome after total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

We identified 1,282 TJA patients (705 knees, 577 hips) who enrolled in a Short Message Service (SMS) chatbot from 2020-2022. 47 patients enrolled in the chatbot received their messages in a language other than English. A historical control of 68 LEP patients not enrolled in the chatbot was identified. Chi-squared, Fisher's Exact, and t-tests were performed to measure the effect that conversational engagement had on ED visits, hospital readmissions, and reoperations.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the conversational engagement between LEP patients and those with English as their primary language (EPL) (12.3 vs. 12.2 text responses, p=0.959). The LEP cohort who enrolled in the chatbot had fewer readmissions (0% vs. 8.3%, p=0.013) and a near significant reduction in ED visits (0.9% vs. 8.0%, p=0.085) compared to those not enrolled. There was no difference in reoperations between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

LEP and EPL patients engaged equally with the multilingual chatbot. LEP patients who enrolled in the chatbot had fewer readmissions and a near significant reduction in ED visits. Multilingual platforms such as this chatbot may provide more equitable care to our frequently encountered LEP patients.

International Perception of Perioperative Risk for Arthroplasty-Experience of the Colombian Health System

BACKGROUND

Following a recent publication of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) which found that 95% of respondents address risk factors before surgery and the challenges in the ultimate access to care, the authors proposed an international collaboration in order to gain insight on how performance measures affect access to care as well as what medical and/or socioeconomic factors are considered obstacles to good outcomes from an international perspective. The aim of this study was to poll Colombia's arthroplasty surgeons regarding their approach to patients who have modifiable risk factors.

METHODS

The survey used in the AAHKS study was adapted for use in the Colombian context and distributed to the members of the Colombian Society of Hip and Knee Surgeons (SOCCAR) via a collaborative format online, and it was completed by 109 out of 163 members, a response rate of 67%.

RESULTS

Overall, 67% limit or restrict surgery in patients with specific modifiable risk factors. Those factors most likely to delay or restrict treatment were malnutrition/hypoalbuminemia (95.9%), poor diabetic control (89%), and active smoking (61.6%). Limited social support was considered a liability by 82.2% of surgeons. Over 80% of respondents decide based on personal experience or literature review. Low socioeconomic status was considered a factor for limiting access by 53.4% of polled surgeons. 91.8% believe some patient populations would benefit with better access to care if payment systems provided better risk adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Only 67% of Colombian arthroplasty surgeons limit or restrict elective surgery in patients with modifiable risk factors, mainly considering malnutrition and poorly controlled diabetes as a cause for restriction, and half of the surgeons consider low socioeconomic status as a limitation to arthroplasty surgery. These findings contrast dramatically to the practice patterns of American AAHKS members.

Does Value-Based Care Threaten Joint Arthroplasty Access for Vulnerable Patient Populations?: AOA Critical Issues

Health-care expenses have been projected to increase from 17.7% of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) in 2014 to 19.6% in 2024. The unsustainable increase in health-care costs has contributed toward support for value-based health care (VBHC) reform. Contemporary VBHC reform programs relevant to orthopaedic surgery include the voluntary Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiatives (BPCI and BPCI-Advanced) and the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, a mandatory bundled payment program.The purported benefits of transitioning from volume-based reimbursement to value-based reimbursement include moving from a fragmented provider-centered care model to a patient-centered model, with greater care coordination and alignment among providers focused on improving value. VBHC models allow innovative strategies to proactively invest resources to promote value (e.g., the use of nurse navigators) while eliminating unnecessary resources that do not promote value. However, major concerns regarding VBHC include the absence of medical and socioeconomic risk stratification as well as decreased access for higher-risk patients.This article identifies the benefits and potential unintended consequences of VBHC reform, with a focus on joint arthroplasty. We also discuss some potential strategies to promote innovation and improve value without compromising access for vulnerable patients.

Access to hip arthroplasty and rates of complications in different socioeconomic groups : a review of 111,000 patients in a universal healthcare system

AIMS

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgical procedures. The objectives of this study were to define whether there is a correlation between socioeconomic status (SES) and surgical complications after elective primary unilateral THA, and investigate whether access to elective THA differs within SES groups.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study involving 202 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, over a 17-year period. Patients were divided into income quintiles based on postal codes as a proxy for personal economic status. Multivariable logistic regression models were then used to primarily assess the relationship between SES and surgical complications within one year of index THA.

RESULTS

Of 111,359 patients who underwent elective primary THA, those in the lower SES groups had statistically significantly more comorbidities and statistically significantly more postoperative complications. While there was no increase in readmission rates within 90 days, there was a statistically significant difference in the primary and secondary outcomes including all revisions due (with a subset of deep wound infection and dislocation). Results showed that those in the higher SES groups had proportionally more cases performed than those in lower groups. Compared to the highest SES quintile, the lower groups had 61% of the number of hip arthroplasties performed.

CONCLUSION

Patients in lower socioeconomic groups have more comorbidities, fewer absolute number of cases performed, have their procedures performed in lower-volume centres, and ultimately have higher rates of complications. This lack of access and higher rates of complications is a "double hit" to those in lower SES groups, and indicates that we should be concentrating efforts to improve access to surgeons and hospitals where arthroplasty is routinely performed in high numbers. Even in a universal healthcare system where there are no penalties for complications such as readmission, there seems to be an inequality in the access to THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):589-597.

Racial Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The primary aim of this review was to evaluate recently published total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies in order to accurately summarize the current concepts regarding racial and ethnic disparities in total joint arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many studies found that racial and ethnic disparities in TJA are present in all phases of arthroplasty care including access to, utilization of, and postoperative outcomes after TJA. Factors that limit patient access to TJA-increased patient comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and Medicaid/uninsured status-are also disproportionately associated with underrepresented patient populations. Minority patients are more likely to require more intensive postoperative rehabilitation and non-home discharge placement. This in turn potentially adds additional concerns regarding hospital/provider reimbursement in light of the current Medicare/Medicaid model for arthroplasty surgeons, thus creating a recurrent cycle in which disparities in TJA reflect the complex interplay of overall health disparities and access inequalities associated with racial and ethnic biases. Literature demonstrating evidenced-based interventions to minimize these disparities is sparse, but the multifactorial cause of disparities in TJA highlights the need for multifaceted solutions on both a systemic and individual level.