Mortality After Postoperative Periprosthetic Fracture of the Femur After Hip Arthroplasty in the Last Decade: Meta-Analysis of 35 Cohort Studies Including 4841 Patients

The Risk of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty Depends More on Stem Design Than Cement Use: An Analysis of National Health Data from England

BACKGROUND

In this study, we estimated the risk of surgically treated postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) associated with femoral implants frequently used for total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

In this cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, POPFFs were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national hospital records. POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders, were estimated for common stems. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients >70 years of age, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and with femoral neck fracture.

RESULTS

POPFFs occurred in 0.6% (5,100) of 809,832 cases during a median follow-up of 6.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9 to 9.6 years). After cemented stem implantation, the majority of POPFFs were treated with fixation. Adjusted prosthesis time incidence rates (PTIRs) for POPFFs varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam (CB) stems demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF compared with the current gold standard of a polished taper slip cemented stem.

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented CB stems were associated with the lowest POPFF risk, and some cementless stem designs outperformed modern cemented stem designs. Stem design was strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when considering femoral implants in those most at risk for POPFF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Retrospective Study on the Incidence of Periprosthetic Fractures Related to Total Hip Arthroplasty and Postoperative Complications During Hospitalization

Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic fractures (PFs) are serious complications that can occur after total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly in elderly patients who often have multiple comorbidities and low bone density. The surgical treatment of PFs typically involves internal fixation or revision arthroplasty, depending on the fracture type categorized by the Vancouver classification. This study examines the annual incidence of PFs and the complications that arise during hospitalization, as well as the predictive role of age in the occurrence of these fractures and their associated complications. Methods: Based on a retrospective observational study conducted over three years (2021-2023) at the Bihor County Emergency Hospital in Oradea, we analyzed 783 patients who underwent various hip surgeries. Results: The retrospective analysis identified 38 cases of PF out of 768 hip surgeries, resulting in an incidence of PF of 4.5%. Most PFs were classified as Vancouver B, with surgeries mainly involving internal fixation. Complications occurred in 23.68% of cases, including a mortality rate of 7.90%. A correlation analysis examining the relationship between age and post-surgical complications demonstrates a weak and statistically insignificant association (r = 0.120, p = 0.478). To highlight whether age is a predictive factor for PFs, we used the linear regression model; this suggests that older age explains 2.7% of the total variability in the incidence of PFs, being statistically significant ([F(1, 766) = 20.923], p < 0.001). Conclusions: The rising incidence of periprosthetic fractures is closely linked to the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties and the aging population. Fractures of this type are more common in elderly women, with no statistically significant differences have been found between the sexes.

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures in England: Patient profiles and short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) present a growing challenge for healthcare services, but there are limited national data on patient profiles, short-term outcomes, and post-discharge follow-up. We aimed to fill these gaps.

METHODS

Using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), we identified POPFF discharges from hospitals in England for patients aged 18 and above between April 2016 and December 2022. We flagged prior admissions for hip fracture and elective hip or knee replacement surgery (primary, revision or re-revision) between April 2000 and the day of the POPFF admission date. We extracted information on patient factors, treatment modes for POPFF (nonoperative, fixation, revision), and outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay, unplanned readmission). We used outpatient data to summarise post-hospitalisation follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 39,035 cases, 65.9 % were female; the median age was 82 years. HES data identified that 34.0 % had previously undergone elective hip replacement, 26.2 % elective knee replacement, and 22.8 % surgery for hip fracture. Those with a prior hip fracture were more likely to have delirium during the index POPFF admission, and, compared with those with a prior elective hip or knee replacement, they faced higher in-hospital mortality (5.1 % vs 3.2 % and 3.6 %, respectively), rates of readmission (15.4 % vs 13.1 % and 12.8 %, respectively), and hip re-fracture after POPFF (2.9 % vs 1.2 % and 1.6 %, respectively). Their median length of stay was longer (16 vs 14 days, p < 0.001). The most common reason for hospital readmission following POPFF was another fracture (11.3 % of all readmissions). Overall, 74 % of patients were discharged from outpatient follow-up within 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This is the first national description of the burden of adverse outcomes for people with POPFF in England, of whom a large proportion require ongoing specialist support. Fewer POPFF cases follow prior hip fracture surgery than elective joint replacement, but these patients face higher risks of worse outcomes. With an expected increasing incidence of POPFF, this may have considerable health service implications.

Risk factors for mortality in periprosthetic femur fractures about the hip-a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Fractures around the hip are known to be an indicator for fragility and are associated with high mortality and various complications. A special type of fractures around the hip are periprosthetic femur fractures (PPF) after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to investigate the mortality rate associated with PPF after THA and to identify risk factors that may increase it.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (N = 158) who were treated for a PPF after THA in our university hospital between 2010 and 2020 were identified and mortality was assessed using the residential registry. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier-Estimator) and multivariate (Cox-Regression) statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors influencing mortality.

RESULTS

One-year-mortality rate was 23.4% and 2-year mortality was 29.2%. Mortality was significantly influenced by age, gender, treatment, type of comorbidity and time of surgery (p < 0.05). Surgical treatment during regular working hours (8 to 18 h) reduced mortality by 53.2% compared to surgery on call (OR: 0.468, 95% CI 0.223, 0.986; p = 0.046). For every year of age, mortality risk increased by 12.9% (OR: 1,129, 95% CI 1.078, 1.182; p < 0.001). The type of fracture according to the Vancouver classification had no influence on mortality (p = 0.179). Plate fixation and conservative treatment were associated with a higher mortality compared to revision arthroplasty (plate: OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.318, 5.998; p = 0.007; conservative: OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.421, 4.507; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment during regular working hours is associated with lower mortality compared to surgery outside these hours. In this retrospective cohort, time to surgery showed no significant impact on all-cause mortality, and revision arthroplasty was associated with lower mortality than conservative treatment or plate fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (Retrospective cohort study).

Peri-implant femoral fractures in elderly: Morbidity, mortality, treatment options and good practices

PURPOSE

Femur fractures are among the most common fractures treated surgically, representing a significant challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) represent a rare complication of the surgical treatment. It is necessary to pay attention during osteosynthesis, evaluating not only the fracture site but the entire femoral skeletal structure, the characteristics of the fracture, the health comorbidities, and the risk of malunion and pseudarthrosis. There are few studies on the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of PIFFs near osteosynthesis. This study aimed to investigate PIFF after osteosynthesis of femoral fractures and evaluate the mortality after surgery and the morbidity associated with these types of fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out at the IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy, between January, 2017 and December, 2022. Inclusion criteria were the presence of a femur fracture around an intramedullary nail to treat a previous fracture, follow-up ≥ 12 months, and patient age ≥ 65 years. Exclusion criterion was intraoperative periprosthetic fractures. The data were expressed as frequency and percentage. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and range.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 patients were enrolled (88.0% female) and the mean age was 84.5 years (range of 70 - 92 years). There were 20 patients having type B PIFF and 5 having type C. In 22 patients, multiple comorbidities were found with an average Charlson comorbidity score of 5.5 and the mean time to peri-implant fracture was 38 months. After surgery, 1 patient (4.0%) presented renal failure, 1 (4.0%) needed removal surgery for their loosening, and 2 (8.0%) presented surgical site infection. Nine patients (36.0%) died within 1 year with a mortality rate of 20. 0% at 30 days, 8.0% at 3 months, and 8.0% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PIFFs in elderly patients are associated with high short-term mortality and morbidity, so careful planning for primary fracture surgery and patient awareness to ensure prolonged compliance and a healthy lifestyle are essential for prevention.

Time to surgical treatment for hip fracture care

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated beneficial outcomes associated with timely surgical treatment of hip fracture. Subsequently, practice recommendations changed with 24-48 h as the recommended time for surgery from admission; however, recent data on timing of hip fracture surgery and how this impacts outcomes are lacking.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who had a primary diagnosis of hip fracture and underwent a subsequent surgical repair within 3 days of admission (Premier Healthcare claims 2006-2021 data). The primary exposure of interest was time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery (categorized as 0-1 day, 2 days, and 3 days). Outcomes included any major complication, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Mixed-effects models measured the association between timing of surgery and outcomes. We report odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Among 501,267 surgical hip fracture patients, 26.0%, 56.0%, and 18.1% of patients received surgery on days 0-1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median ages were 83, 84, and 84 years old, and there were 73.3%, 72.2%, and 68.8% female in each group respectively. Compared with repair on day 0-1, hip fracture surgical treatment on day 2 or day 3 was associated with increased odds of major complications (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08 and OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13-1.2), mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14 and OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.12-1.28), and ICU admission (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09 and OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32-1.4) after adjusting major comorbidities; all p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Despite the publication of society guidelines in 2015, most fracture patients still received surgery on day 2 or day 3 of admission and were associated with worse outcomes. Balancing optimization of clinical factors with timing of surgery can be challenging, and further research is needed. Nonetheless, our findings reiterate the importance of timely surgical intervention.

Predictive factors for reoperation after periprosthetic femoral fracture: A retrospective multicenter (TRON) study

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) can be technically demanding and it is associated with high rates of complications and repeat surgery. However, repeat surgery is uncommon and few studies have examined survival and the functional prognosis following reoperation after the surgical treatment of PFF. We aimed to estimate the rate of reoperation for any reason, to determine the survival rate after reoperation for PFF, and to identify predictors associated with reoperation after PFF surgery in a multicenter (TRON group) study.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-six patients were admitted for treatment of PFF. After excluding patients managed conservatively and those with Vancouver type A fracture, we analyzed 184 patients. Unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, and multiple logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted RRs. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to create survival curves and a log-rank test to determine survival from the date of repeat surgery.

RESULTS

Fifteen of the 184 patients (8.2 %) underwent reoperation after PFF surgery. The 1-year survival rate after reoperation for PFF was 66.7 % (11 of 15). Vancouver B3 and Vancouver C were identified as independent risk factors for reoperation after PFF surgery (Vancouver B3: Risk ratio [RR] 19.0, 95 % CI 1.10-329 P < 0.001; Vancouver C: RR 13.3, 95 % CI 1.4-123.0, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The reoperation rate after PFF surgery and the mortality after reoperation PFF surgery were relatively high. The fracture type is associated with reoperation after PFF surgery.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Is a Feasible Alternative to Femoral Revision Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients with Vancouver B2/3 Type Periprosthetic Fractures: A Study Analyzing In-Hospital Outcomes

Purpose: The surgical management of periprosthetic femoral fractures is particularly challenging in geriatric patients due to physiological limitations. The choice between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and hip revision arthroplasty for treating Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures remains controversial. This study aims to contribute further evidence by analyzing the in-hospital outcomes in geriatric patients with Vancouver B2/3 fractures. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 133 patients treated for Vancouver B2/3 fractures at a level I trauma center from 2017 to 2023. Data were collected on preclinical characteristics, comorbidities, Vancouver classification, surgery-related parameters, and postoperative outcomes for an age- and gender-matched analysis. A subgroup analysis was also conducted on patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 and 4. Results: Among the 133 patients, 85 suffered Vancouver B2 fractures and 48 Vancouver B3 fractures. Age-and-gender-matched analysis revealed that ORIF was more commonly performed in patients with higher ASA grades. A subgroup analysis of ASA 3 and 4 patients and an age-and-gender-matched analysis showed that ORIF resulted in shorter operation times and less blood loss. No significant differences were found in mortality or complication rates. Conclusions: ORIF is associated with shorter operation times, less bleeding, and comparable in-hospital outcomes in treating Vancouver B2/3 fractures in higher-risk geriatric patients compared to revision arthroplasty. The retrospective design and small sample size in the ORIF group are limitations of the study. Further studies with functional evaluation are still required.

Predictors of outcomes after internal fixation of periprosthetic femoral hip fractures Subgroup analysis of the peri-implant and peri-prosthetic fractures Spanish registry (PIPPAS)

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors predisposing patients to poor outcomes after fixation of periprosthetic hip fractures around femoral stems.

METHODS

Prospective multicentre cohort study of fractures around a hip replacement stem managed by internal fixation. The primary outcome was one-year mortality, while secondary outcomes were local complications and healthcare burden-related outcomes (nursing facility utilization and hospital length of stay).

RESULTS

One-year mortality was 16.2%. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (OR=1.17; 95%CI=1.03-1.33)), Pfeiffer Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score (OR=1.16; 1.06-1.28), prosthetic dysfunction (OR=1.90; 1.00-3.61), and postoperative medical complications (OR=1.97; 1.06-3.68) were predictors of mortality. Patients with prior prosthetic dysfunction, lower Pfeiffer SPMSQ scores, Vancouver A fractures, and fractures fixed only using cerclages were at higher risk of local complications, which occurred in 9.3% of cases. Medical (OR=1.81; 1.05-3.13) and local complications (OR=5.56; 2.42-3.13) emerged as consistent risk factors for new institutionalization. Average hospitalization time was 13.9±9.2 days. Each day of fixation delay led to an average 1.4-day increase in total hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Frail periprosthetic hip-fracture patients with poorer functional status, dysfunctional replacements, and postoperative complications are at increased risk of mortality. Postoperative complications are more common in patients with dysfunctional arthroplasties, Vancouver A fractures, and fixation using cerclages alone. Postoperative complications were the most consistent predictor of higher healthcare resource utilization.

Systemic Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Among Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Most periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses. However, it remains unknown how many patients were diagnosed who had osteoporosis before injury or received the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment after injury.

METHODS

We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femur fractures treated with a modular fluted tapered stem from 2000 to 2018 at 1 institution. The mean patient age was 75 years (range, 35 to 94), 50% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29 (range, 17 to 60). We identified patients who had osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnoses, a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), bone mineral density (BMD) testing, an endocrinology consult, and osteoporosis medications. Age-appropriate BMD testing was defined as no later than 1 year after the recommended ages of 65 (women) or 70 years (men). The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 4 to 21).

RESULTS

Falls from standing height caused 94% of fractures and thus, by definition, qualified as osteoporosis-defining events. The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis increased from 20% before periprosthetic fracture to 39% after (P < .001). The prevalence of osteopenia diagnosis increased from 13% before the fracture to 24% after (P < .001). The prevalence of either diagnosis increased from 24% before fracture to 44% after (P < .001). No patients had documented FRAX scores before fracture, and only 2% had scores after. The prevalence of BMD testing was 21% before fracture and 22% after (P = .88). By the end of the final follow-up, only 16% had received age-appropriate BMD testing. The proportion of patients who had endocrinology consults increased from 6% before the fracture to 25% after (P < .001). The proportion on bisphosphonate therapy was 19% before fracture and 25% after (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most periprosthetic fractures following THA are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, screening, endocrinology follow-up, and treatment. Like nonarthroplasty fragility fractures, a systematic approach is needed after periprosthetic fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The burden of periprosthetic femoral fractures in England and Wales: Insights from the first two years of data collection in the National Hip Fracture Database and regional variation in care

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs) represent an important healthcare problem, with a rising incidence noted due to an increase in the number of arthroplasty surgeries being performed. There is a current lack of national consensus as to how these complex, often frail patients are managed.

AIMS

Our primary aim was to present the epidemiology of PPFFs in England and Wales over the first two years of data collection by the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Secondary aims included how well the NHFD Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are met for PPFF patients, whether centres reporting a higher burden of PPFF patients are more likely to meet KPIs compared to lower volume centres, and to also identify if regional variation in care for these patients exist.

METHODS

Patients aged 60 years or over, admitted to any acute hospital in England or Wales with a PPFF within the period 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2021 were included. Fractures were classified using the Vancouver system. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of PPFF in England and Wales. Secondary outcomes included i) geographical distribution, ii) pattern of injury, iii) treatment received, iv) KPI performance nationally, v) KPI performance by top 5 highest volume hospitals vs the rest, vi) KPI performance by region and vii) KPI performance compared with native hip fracture patients.

RESULTS

A total of 5,566 PPFFs were reported during our study period. A 31 % increase in cases was seen between 2020 and 2021 (2,405 to 3,161). The South-West of England reported the highest burden of PPFFs (14 % of all cases reported in 2021). Vancouver B subtypes were most common around hip replacements (62 %) and C subtype around knee replacements (55 %). A total of 4,598 patients (82.6 %) underwent operative management. There was regional variation in KPI attainment. When compared to KPI attainment for native hip fractures PPFF care under performed in most regions and domains. High volume PPFF centres were not associated with improved attainment of KPIs.

CONCLUSION

We have described the incidence, nature, and management of PPFF at national and regional levels using routinely collected NHFD data. Both numerically and due to case complexity, PPFF are a considerable challenge to patients and health services alike. This epidemiology is not captured by other existing datasets and increased case contribution to the NHFD is encouraged to improve understanding and enable prioritisation and delivery of further care and research.

The effect of distal locking mode on postoperative mechanical complications in intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective cohort study of five hundred and seven patients

PURPOSE

The optimal choice of distal locking modes remains a subject due to limited available data, and therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between distal locking mode and postoperative mechanical complications in an intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) population who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary fixation with a PFNA-II.

METHODS

Patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery with PFNA-II fixation in a university teaching hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were potentially eligible. Based on the distal locking mode, patients were classified into static, dynamic, and limited dynamic groups, among which the differences were tested using univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine whether the distal locking mode was independently associated with the risk of postoperative one year mechanical complications, adjusting for covariates and potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings.

RESULT

Among 507 eligible patients, 33 (6.5%) developed postoperative mechanical complications. In the univariate analysis, sex (P = 0.007), fracture type (P = 0.020), LAT Parker ratio (P = 0.023), and lateral femoral (P = 0.003) wall showed that the differences were significant. Compared to the static group, the limited dynamic group and the dynamic group showed higher odds of postoperative mechanical complications (OR = 3.314, 95% CI: 1.215-9.041; and OR = 3.652, 95% CI: 1.451-9.191, respectively). These associations were robust across a series of analyses, including adjusting for confounders and subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Using a distal non-static locking mode significantly increases the risk of postoperative mechanical complications, and static locking could be a preferable option when treating an intertrochanteric fracture.

Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Vancouver B1 and C: The Significance of Bicortical Fixation. A Bicentric Study Comparing Two Osteosynthesis Systems

INTRODUCTION The incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PFFs) is estimated to range from 0.1% to 4.1%1, due to the increasing prevalence of joint arthroplasties, coupled with an aging population. Numerous risk factors, including advanced age (>80 years), female gender, implant type, prior diagnoses of osteonecrosis and rheumatoid arthritis, revision surgery, aseptic stem mobilization, and the use of non-cemented stems, have been identified. Survivors of periprosthetic fractures often experience functional deterioration, facing a fourfold higher risk of hospitalization for postoperative complications compared to patients undergoing primary implantation, especially in the first postoperative year. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2018 and 2022, at the Maggiore Hospitals in Bologna and the San Matteo Policlinic in Pavia, we performed osteosynthesis on 84 patients with periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B1 or C. In 38 patients, we employed angular stable plates with the Zimmer Biomet NCB-PP® system. In 46 patients, we utilized INTRAUMA plates: DF distal femur and PFF proximal. Relevant postoperative follow-up outcomes considered included reintervention, infectious complications, radiographic healing, and functional recovery, with reference to changes in the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). All patients underwent clinical and radiographic evaluations during the follow-up period, averaging 28 months (range: 12-48 months), with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. RESULTS At the 4-month postoperative assessment, 71% of patients maintained their preoperative functional level, 19% experienced a 1-point GOS scale drop, and 10% died (GOS 5). The average HHS at 4 months was 80.2 points (range: 65-90). At the 6-month follow-up, 98.2% of patients achieved complete healing on radiographic examination. Only 1 patient (1.2%) developed a pseudoarthrosis site with synthesis device rupture. Only 1 patient (1.2%) required additional surgical treatment 2 years later due to the development of un aseptic perisynthetic fluid collection, while the remaining 5 patients (6%) who developed complications benefited from conservative treatment: 4 patients (3.6%) with infectious complications were treated with intravenous antibiotics. In the 2 patients (2.3%) with mobilization or rupture of synthesis devices, clinical and radiographic monitoring was opted for. 8 patients (10.7%) died: one 48 hours after the surgery, and the other 7 more than one month after the surgery. CONCLUSION Our clinical findings align with to existing scientific literature on periprosthetic fractures (B1 and C according to Vancouver classification). Moreover, good stability has been guaranteed at the radiological follow up by Zimmer Biomet NCB-PP® and INTRAUMA DF distal femur and PFF proximal plates. The locking construct allows for improved stability especially in osteoporotic bone.

[Concept for the treatment of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures]

Due to demographic changes and increased survival rates of total hip arthroplasties, the incidence of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures is increasing. The current treatment concept requires accurate preoperative planning. Besides patient-related risk factors, fracture type, prosthesis stability, and bone quality influence whether osteosynthesis or a revision arthroplasty is required.

Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) after revision arthroplasty following periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 in geriatric trauma patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the outcome parameters of revision arthroplasties for periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) with a particular attention to quality of life (QoL) and mobility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective single-center study of PPFF with loose implants that underwent revision arthroplasty. Depending on individual patient characteristics, either an uncemented or cemented revision stem was chosen. Data collection included demographics, complications, clinical course and outcome parameters. Follow-up took place at least one year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2016, 43 patients could be included. Most patients (63%) were able to walk independently or with a walking aid after one year and amongst the surveyed patients 77% were able to reside at home. Concerning the QoL assessment, a high index of 0.8 ± 0.1 has been reached after one year. Mortality pointed out to be 9% after one year and 28% in general.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of PPFF remains challenging. Although complication rates and mortality are high in this frail collective of geriatric patients, revision arthroplasty leads to good postoperative results regarding mobility and quality of life.

Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures treatment: fix or replace? A retrospective study comparing both techniques

INTRODUCTION

Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures involve stem stability and they have been classically treated with revision surgery. Crucial factors such as age, clinical comorbidities and functional status are often neglected. The current study aims to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or femoral stem exchange.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that includes all Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures in a tertiary referral hospital from 2016 to 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1. Patients treated with an ORIF and Group 2. Patients treated with stem replacement. The outcomes that were compared between groups included demographic data, functional capacity, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

29 periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fractures were finally analyzed. 11 (37.9%) were treated with ORIF (Group 1) and 18 (62.1%) by stem replacement (Group 2). Surgery time (143 vs. 160 min), hemoglobin drop (1.8 vs. 2.5 g/dL) and hospital stance (25.5 vs. 29.6 days) were shorter in Group 1. According to complications, 18.2% of patients in the ORIF group had orthopedic complications compared with 44.4% in the revision group. In the revision group, 3 cases needed a two-stage revision and one of these revisions ended up with a resection arthroplasty (Girdlestone). The first-year mortality rate was 27% in Group 1 and 11% in Group 2.

DISCUSSION

ORIF treatment seems to be a less aggressive and complex procedure which can lead to a faster general recovery. Revision surgery can imply a higher risk of orthopedic complications which can be severe and may require further aggressive solutions. The ORIF group mortality was similar to the proximal femur fracture rate (20-30%). In conclusion, ORIF treatment seems to be a good option especially in fragile patients with low functional demand when anatomical reduction is possible.

Early Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: High Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Subsequent Reoperation

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a leading cause of early reoperation. The objective of this study was to compare rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and reoperation following PFFs occurring early postoperatively to those that occurred late.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 173 consecutive surgically managed PFFs following primary THA. Cases were categorized as "early" if they occurred within 90 days of THA (n = 117) or "late" if they occurred following the initial 90 days (n = 56). Mean age at time of PFF was 68 years (range, 26 to 96) and 60% were women. Mean body mass index was 29 (range, 16 to 52). Mean follow-up was 2 years (range, 0 to 13). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated cumulative incidences of PJI and reoperation.

RESULTS

Early PFFs had higher 2-year cumulative incidence of PJI (11% versus 0%, P < .001) and reoperation (24% versus 13%, P = .110). Following early PFF, 27 patients required reoperation (ie, 13 for PJI, 5 for instability, 2 for re-fracture, 2 for painful hardware, 2 for non-union, 1 for adverse local tissue reaction, 1 for aseptic loosening, and 1 for leg-length discrepancy). Following late PFF, 5 patients required reoperation (ie, 3 for instability, 1 for re-fracture, and 1 for non-union).

CONCLUSIONS

There are greater incidences of PJIs and overall reoperations following early PFFs compared to late PFFs after THA. In addition to focusing efforts on prevention of early PFFs, surgeons should consider antiseptic interventions to mitigate the increased risk of PJI after treatment of early PFF.

Analysis of complications in 97 periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fractures treated either by internal fixation or revision arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures after hip arthroplasty is still a matter of debate. Revision Arthroplasty (RA) was long thought to be the treatment of choice, however several recent papers suggested that Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) is a viable option for selected B2 fractures. Complication rates of 14-26% have been reported following surgical treatment of B2 fractures. No significant difference between RA and ORIF in the complication rates nor in the functional outcome was observed.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 97 consecutive Vancouver B2 fractures treated according to the algorithm at our institution from 2007 to 2020 and recorded complications and patient specific data.

RESULT

From the 97 patient, 45 fractures were treated with RA while 52 fractures were treated with ORIF. Thirteen patients in the RA group had a complication that needed revision (28%) and 11 patients in the ORIF group needed revision (21%). There was no significant difference between complication rates. The reason for failure in the 13 RA patients were infection (n = 4), stem subsidence (n = 1), refracture after a new fall (n = 3), secondary dislocation of the greater trochanter (n = 1) and dislocation (n = 4). The reason for failure in the 11 ORIF patients that were revised were infection (n = 5), persistent symptomatic stem loosening (n = 3) and refracture (n = 3) after a new fall.

CONCLUSION

ORIF can be used to revise cemented and non-cemented shafts in more than half of Vancouver B2 fractures with no difference in complication rates when compared to RA. A periprosthetic fracture around the hip has a 21-28% risk of a re-operation after revision surgery with infection and re-fracture after a new fall being the most frequent cause of re-operation.

Optimizing periprosthetic fracture management and in-hospital outcome: insights from the PIPPAS multicentric study of 1387 cases in Spain

BACKGROUND

The incidence of all periprosthetic fractures (PPF), which require complex surgical treatment associated with high morbidity and mortality, is predicted to increase. The evolving surgical management has created a knowledge gap regarding its impact on immediate outcomes. This study aimed to describe current management strategies for PPF and their repercussions for in-hospital outcomes as well as to evaluate their implications for the community.

METHODS

PIPPAS (Peri-Implant PeriProsthetic Survival Analysis) was a prospective multicentre observational study of 1387 PPF performed during 2021. Descriptive statistics summarized the epidemiology, fracture characteristics, management, and immediate outcomes. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was employed to evaluate potential predictors of in-hospital mortality, complications, discharge status, and weight-bearing restrictions.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 32 (2.3%) shoulder, 4 (0.3%) elbow, 751 (54.1%) hip, 590 (42.5%) knee, and 10 (0.7%) ankle PPF. Patients were older (median 84 years, IQR 77-89), frail [median clinical frailty scale (CFS) 5, IQR 3-6], presented at least one comorbidity [median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) 5, IQR 4-7], were community dwelling (81.8%), and had outdoor ambulation ability (65.6%). Femoral knee PPF were most frequently associated with uncemented femoral components, while femoral hip PPF occurred equally in cemented and uncemented stems. Patients were managed surgically (82%), with co-management (73.9%), through open approaches (85.9%) after almost 4 days (IQR, 51.9-153.6 h), with prosthesis revision performed in 33.8% of femoral hip PPF and 6.5% of femoral knee PPF. For half of the patients, the discharge instructions mandated weight-bearing restrictions. In-hospital mortality rates were 5.2% for all PPF and 6.2% for femoral hip PPF. Frailty, age > 84 years, mild cognitive impairment, CFS > 3, CCI > 3, and non-geriatric involvement were candidate predictors for in-hospital mortality, medical complications, and discharge to a nursing care facility. Management involving revision arthroplasty by experienced surgeons favoured full weight-bearing, while an open surgical approach favoured weight-bearing restrictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Current arthroplasty fixation check and revision rates deviate from established guidelines, yet full weight-bearing is favoured. A surgical delay of over 100 h and a lack of geriatric co-management were related to in-hospital mortality and medical complications. This study recommends judicious hypoaggressive approaches. Addressing complications and individualizing the surgical strategy can lead to enhanced functional outcomes, alleviating the economic and social burdens upon hospital discharge. Level of Evidence Level IV case series.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04663893), protocol ID: PI 20-2041.

Are periprosthetic hip fractures more severe than native hip fractures? A systematic review of outcomes and resource utilization

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data comparing periprosthetic hip fracture (PPHFx) outcomes and resource utilization to native fractures. Many surgeons consider periprosthetic hip fractures to be more severe injuries than native fractures. The aim of this systematic review is to characterize the outcomes of PPHFx and assess their severity relative to native hip fractures (NHFx).

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis systematic review was conducted using Medline, Biosis, and Cinahl. Primary outcomes were time to surgery, length of stay (LOS), cost of management, disposition, complication rates, readmission rates, and mortality.

RESULTS

14 articles (13,489 patients) from 2010 to 2018 were included in the study. Study quality was generally low. Patient follow-up ranged from 1 month to 3.2 years. LOS ranged from 5.2 to 38 days. US cost of management was best estimated at $53,669 ± 19,817. Discharge to skilled nursing facilities ranged from 64.5 to 74.5%. Time to surgery ranged from 1.9 to 5.7 days. Readmission rates ranged from 12 to 32%. Per Clavien-Dindo classification, 33.9% suffered minor complications; 14.3% suffered major complications. 1 month and 1 year mortality ranged from 2.9% to 10% and 9.7% to 45%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Time to surgery and LOS were longer for PPHFx relative to NHFx. Complications' rates were higher for PPHFx compared to NHFx. There is no evidence for differences in LOS, cost, discharge, readmission rates, or mortality between PPHFx and NHFx. These results may serve as a baseline in future evaluation of PPHFx management.

The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures around the knee

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries. This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital mortality.

Methods

Using a multicentre study design, independent of registry data, we included adult patients sustaining a PPF around a knee arthroplasty between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Univariate, then multivariable, logistic regression analyses were performed to study the impact of patient, fracture, and treatment on mortality.

Results

Out of a total of 1,667 patients in the PPF study database, 420 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.4%. Multivariable analyses suggested that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), history of rheumatic disease, fracture around a loose implant, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during hospital stay were each independently associated with mortality. Each point increase in ASA grade independently correlated with a four-fold greater mortality risk (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 14.06); p = 0.026). Patients with PVD have a nine-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 9.1 (95% CI 1.25 to 66.47); p = 0.030) and patients with rheumatic disease have a 6.8-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.32 to 34.68); p = 0.022). Patients with a fracture around a loose implant (Unified Classification System (UCS) B2) have a 20-fold increase in mortality, compared to UCS A1 (OR 20.9 (95% CI 1.61 to 271.38); p = 0.020). Mode of management was not a significant predictor of mortality. Patients managed with revision arthroplasty had a significantly longer length of stay (median 16 days; p = 0.029) and higher rates of return to theatre, compared to patients treated nonoperatively or with fixation.

Conclusion

The mortality rate in PPFs around the knee is similar to that for native distal femur and neck of femur fragility fractures. Patients with certain modifiable risk factors should be optimized. A national PPF database and standardized management guidelines are currently required to understand these complex injuries and to improve patient outcomes.

Predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures of the hip: Results from the national PPF study

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the hip joint are increasing in prevalence. In this collaborative study, we aimed to investigate the impact of patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and modes of management on in-hospital mortality of PPFs involving the hip.

METHODS

Using a multi-centre cohort study design, we retrospectively identified adults presenting with a PPF around the hip over a 10-year period. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the independent correlation between patient, fracture, and treatment factors on mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,109 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%. Multivariable analyses suggested that age, male sex, abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), pneumonia, renal failure, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and deep surgical site infection were each independently associated with mortality. Each yearly increase in age independently correlates with a 7% increase in mortality (OR 1.07, p=0.019). The odds of mortality was 2.99 times higher for patients diagnosed with pneumonia during their hospital stay [OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.07-8.37) p=0.037], and 7.25 times higher for patients that developed renal failure during their stay [OR 7.25 (95% CI 1.85-28.47) p=0.005]. Patients with history of PVD have a six-fold greater mortality risk (OR 6.06, p=0.003). Mode of treatment was not a significant predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSION

The in-hospital mortality rate of PPFs around the hip exceeds 5%. The fracture subtype and mode of management are not independent predictors of mortality, while patient factors such as age, AMTS, history of PVD, pneumonia, and renal failure can independently predict mortality. Peri-operative optimisation of modifiable risk factors such as lung and kidney function in patients with PPFs around the hip during their hospital stay is of utmost importance.

A comparison of mortality rates following revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture, infection or aseptic loosening

BACKGROUND

Mortality following revision hip surgery for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is comparable to neck of femur fractures. Our institution provides a regional "PPF Service". The aim of this study was to determine the time to surgery and mortality rate for PPF, compared to revision for infection or aseptic loosening.

METHODS

Revision arthroplasty procedures performed for PPF, infection or aseptic loosening between January 2014 and December 2015 were identified. Comparisons were made between the 3 groups for baseline demographics, admission to higher-level care, length of stay, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 37 PPF, 71 infected and 221 aseptic revisions. PPF had a higher proportion of females (65% vs. 39% in infection and 53% in aseptic; p = 0.031) and grade 3 and 4 ASA patients (p = 0.006). Median time to surgery for PPF was 8 days (95% CI, 6-16). Single-stage procedures were performed in 84% of PPF, 42% of infections and 99% of aseptic revisions (p < 0.001). 19% of PPF revisions required HDU admission, 1% in the aseptic group and none in the infection group. Median length of stay was significantly different (PPF 10; infection 14; aseptic 8 days (p < 0.001). The 1-year mortality rate for PPF was 0%, 2.8% for infection and 0.9% in the aseptic group (p = 0.342).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the PPF group having higher ASA grades and more HDU admissions, our 1-year mortality rate was 0% and not significantly different to infection or aseptic loosening. Our low complication and 1-year mortality rate is encouraging and supports the safety of a regional "Periprosthetic Fracture Service".

What enhances the in-hospital mortality following total hip arthroplasty? A national inpatient sample-based study

PURPOSE

With prolonged life expectancy and advancements in prosthetic designs, the proportion of patients belonging to diverse age groups undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) has progressively increased. In this context, the details regarding risk factors associated with mortality after THA, and its prevalence need to be clearly understood. This study sought to identify the possible co-morbidities associated with post-THA mortality.

METHODS

Based on Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients undergoing THA from 2016 to 2019 (using ICD-10CMP) were identified. The included cohort was stratified into two groups: "early mortality" and "no mortality" groups. The data regarding patients' demographics, co-morbidities, and associated complications were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 337,249 patients underwent THA, among whom, 332 (0.1%) died during their hospital admission ("early mortality" group). The remaining patients were included under "no mortality" group (336,917 patients). There was significantly higher mortality in the patients, who underwent emergent THA (as compared with elective THA: odd's ratio 0.075; p < 0.001). Based on multivariate analysis, presence of liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and previous history of organ transplant increased the odds of mortality {odds ratio [Exp (B)]} after THA by 4.66- (p < 0.001), 2.37-fold (p < 0.001) and 1.91-fold (p = 0.04), respectively. Among post-THA complications, acute renal failure (ARF), pulmonary embolism (PE), pneumonia, myocardial infarction (MI), and prosthetic dislocation increased the odds of post-THA mortality by 20.64-fold (p < 0.001), 19.35-fold (p < 0.001), 8.21-fold (p < 0.001), 2.71-fold (p = 0.05) and 2.54-fold (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

THA is a safe surgery with low mortality rate during early post-operative period. Cirrhosis, CKD, and previous history of organ transplant were the most common co-morbidities associated with post-THA mortality. Among post-operative complications, ARF, PE, pneumonia, MI, and prosthetic dislocation substantially enhanced the odds of post-THA mortality.

Increased mortality after total hip prosthetic joint infection is mainly caused by the comorbidities rather than the infection itself

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a feared complication of arthroplasty surgery. There is controversy as to whether PJI also correlates with increased mortality. Our aim was to investigate in a nationwide cohort if PJI is an independent risk factor for dying.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study based on data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). All patients with a revision THA performed between 1998 and 2017 were included. The outcome is mortality; exposure is PJI according to SHAR. The control group was study participants who underwent aseptic revision. Confounders were age, sex, diagnosis, and comorbidity according to the Elixhauser index. The outcome was analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

4,943 PJI revisions and 12,529 non-infected revisions were included in the analysis. The median follow-up time was 4.1 years. In the PJI group, 1,972 patients died and in the control group, 4,512. The incidence rate ratio was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.25), the crude hazard ratio (HR) 1.19 (CI 1.13-1.25), and the adjusted HR 1.05 (CI 0.99-1.12) for the exposed versus the unexposed group. The strongest confounder was comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

The increased mortality risk after revision due to PJI is mainly caused by the comorbidity of the patient, rather than by the infection itself.

Frank Stinchfield Award: Creation of a Patient-Specific Total Hip Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Fracture Risk Calculator

BACKGROUND

Many risk factors have been described for periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFFx) following total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet a patient-specific risk assessment tool remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to develop a high-dimensional, patient-specific risk-stratification nomogram that allows dynamic risk modification based on operative decisions.

METHODS

We evaluated 16,696 primary nononcologic THAs performed between 1998 and 2018. During a mean 6-year follow-up, 558 patients (3.3%) sustained a PPFFx. Patients were characterized by individual natural language processing-assisted chart review on nonmodifiable factors (demographics, THA indication, and comorbidities), and modifiable operative decisions (femoral fixation [cemented/uncemented], surgical approach [direct anterior, lateral, and posterior], and implant type [collared/collarless]). Multivariable Cox regression models and nomograms were developed with PPFFx as a binary outcome at 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years, postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patient-specific PPFFx risk based on comorbid profile was wide-ranging from 0.4-18% at 90 days, 0.4%-20% at 1 year, and 0.5%-25% at 5 years. Among 18 evaluated patient factors, 7 were retained in multivariable analyses. The 4 significant nonmodifiable factors included the following: women (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.6), older age (HR = 1.2 per 10 years), diagnosis of osteoporosis or use of osteoporosis medications (HR = 1.7), and indication for surgery other than osteoarthritis (HR = 2.2 for fracture, HR = 1.8 for inflammatory arthritis, HR = 1.7 for osteonecrosis). The 3 modifiable surgical factors were included as follows: uncemented femoral fixation (HR = 2.5), collarless femoral implants (HR = 1.3), and surgical approach other than direct anterior (lateral HR = 2.9, posterior HR = 1.9).

CONCLUSION

This patient-specific PPFFx risk calculator demonstrated a wide-ranging risk based on comorbid profile and enables surgeons to quantify risk mitigation based on operative decisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Prognostic.

Contemporary mortality rate and outcomes in nonagenarians after aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty

Aims

Nonagenarians (aged 90 to 99 years) have experienced the fastest percent decile population growth in the USA recently, with a consequent increase in the prevalence of nonagenarians living with joint arthroplasties. As such, the number of revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in nonagenarians is expected to increase. We aimed to determine the mortality rate, implant survivorship, and complications of nonagenarians undergoing aseptic revision THAs and revision TKAs.

Methods

Our institutional total joint registry was used to identify 96 nonagenarians who underwent 97 aseptic revisions (78 hips and 19 knees) between 1997 and 2018. The most common indications were aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture for both revision THAs and revision TKAs. Mean age at revision was 92 years (90 to 98), mean BMI was 27 kg/m² (16 to 47), and 67% (n = 65) were female. Mean time between primary and revision was 18 years (SD 9). Kaplan-Meier survival was used for patient mortality, and compared to age- and sex-matched control populations. Reoperation risk was assessed using cumulative incidence with death as a competing risk. Mean follow-up was five years.

Results

Mortality rates were 9%, 18%, 26%, and 62% at 90 days, one year, two years, and five years, respectively, but similar to control populations. There were 43 surgical complications and five reoperations, resulting in a cumulative incidence of reoperation of 4% at five years. Medical complications were common, with a cumulative incidence of 65% at 90 days. Revisions for periprosthetic fractures were associated with higher mortality and higher 90-day risk of medical complications compared to revisions for aseptic loosening.

Conclusion

Contemporary revision THAs and TKAs appeared to be relatively safe in selected nonagenarians managed with multidisciplinary teams. Cause of revision affected morbidity and mortality risks. While early medical and surgical complications were frequent, they seldom resulted in reoperation.

Hip Arthroplasty Femoral Stem Designs and Their Association With Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially those in contact with the diaphyseal stem, carry high morbidity. This study evaluated how stem design influences the risk of early Vancouver B PFF or other PFF requiring operative intervention after THA.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study of 3,433 primary cementless THAs performed from 2014 to 2021 included 2,302 single-taper (micro M/L [n = 1,169]; M/L [n = 1,133]) and 1,131 double-taper (fit-and-fill [n = 420]; compaction-collared [n = 711]) stems. Mean follow-up was 2.2 years (range, 0.3 to 6.5 years). Primary outcomes were Vancouver B and surgically treated postoperative PFFs among differing femoral stems. Secondary outcomes included rates of intraoperative and postoperative Vancouver A and C PFFs.

RESULTS

Forty five postoperative PFFs (1.3%) occurred within 8.8 weeks (median), 25 of which were Vancouver B (0.7%) and 20 total PFFs that required operative intervention (0.6%). Compaction-collared stems had a decreased risk of Vancouver B (hazard ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.97 P = .044) and any surgically treated PFF (hazard ratio 0.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.95; P = .037). Intraoperative PFFs were most common with fit-and-fill stems (3.6%, P < .001) and Vancouver A with compaction-collared stems (1.8%, P < .001). The cohort with PFF had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (P = .004), more women (P = .001), more Dorr A or C femora (P = .013), and more posterior or lateral surgical approaches compared to those without PFF (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

After controlling for confounding variables, compaction-collared stems had a significantly lower risk of postoperative Vancouver B and PFF requiring operative treatment than single-taper and double-taper stems.

[Contemporary indications for aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroplasties and revision procedures will continue to rise over the next decades. In 2020 in Germany, 75% of all revision surgeries involved an exchange of at least one component; exchanges of all components were carried out in 27.5% of the revisions. The most common failure modes were aseptic loosening, infections, periprosthetic fractures, instabilities, and metal-related pathologies.

INDICATIONS

Aseptic loosening remains the most common reason for revision. However, the indications for hip arthroplasty revisions have changed over time, with a decrease in revisions due to aseptic loosening and an increase in revisions due to infection and periprosthetic fracture. The rate of dislocations remained approximately constant over the past decade, with international differences. Metal-associated pathologies will continue to play a significant role in revision hip arthroplasty.