Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using 3-layered Fascia Lata Autograft Reinforced with a Nonresorbable Suture Mesh

Evaluating shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) outcomes post-rotator cuff repair: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) analysis

BackgroundThe Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is one of the most widely used Patient Reported Outcome Measures designed to assess the severity of pain and disability in patients with shoulder conditions.ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to define the clinically significant outcomes of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the SPADI scores after Rotator Cuff Repair (RCR).MethodsThe present study takes into account patients undergone RCR with a 6-month follow-up. The MCID, PASS and SCB of the SPADI score were evaluated using both distribution and anchor approaches.ResultsFifty-nine patients (mean aged 60.3 ± 13.1 years) who had undergone RCR in a single surgical center were retrospectively included. The MCID cutoff of the SPADI total score after RCR from the initial evaluation to 6 months post-operatively was 17 (95% CI:13.6,20.4). The outcome measures for the MCID and SCB values of the SPADI pain score were 26 (95% CI:22.3,29.7) and 37 (95% CI:33.4,40.6), respectively. The MCID threshold of the SPADI disability score was 21.9 (95% CI:18.7,25.1). A value of at least 76.9 (95% CI:73.4,80.4), 75 (95% CI:71.6,78.4), and 78.1 (95% CI:74.6,81.6) for SPADI total, pain, and disability dimensions, represented the PASS.ConclusionsThe study shows significant improvements in SPADI scores after RCR, suggesting that could lead to meaningful pain relief and functional recovery. The findings indicate that a post-operative SPADI total score of at least 76.9 correlates with patient satisfaction regarding shoulder health.

Autologous Tendon "Bamboo Raft" Graft for Reconstruction of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Superior capsular reconstruction has shown long-term clinical effectiveness in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, playing a key role in reducing humeral head translation and restoring the force-couple balance. Various graft techniques involving different types of grafts, such as autologous fascia lata, allogeneic dermal patches, and autologous long head of the biceps tendon, have been described. However, these approaches were often limited by factors such as extensive surgical trauma, high donor-site morbidity, and insufficient mechanical strength of the grafts. We describe autologous tendons, such as the hamstring tendon, fashioned into a "bamboo raft" configuration to create a graft for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. This technique offers several advantages, including minimal surgical trauma, low donor-site complication rates, and superior mechanical strength of the graft.

Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tear: a review of current methods

Irreparable massive rotator cuff tears can significantly impact daily life; and these types of tears can be difficult to repair completely, especially in younger patients who are more active and have higher functional requirements. Since its introduction by Mihata and the colleagues, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has gained popularity in the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears and has shown promising short-term results. A variety of studies have focused on the clinical and biomechanical outcomes of this procedure. This article reviews the biomechanics, indications for the surgical procedure, graft options, surgical technique, and rehabilitation from SCR.

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with dermal allograft for primary and recurrent rotator cuff tears

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and retear rate of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with dermal allograft following structural failure of a previous rotator cuff repair, with a cohort of primary SCRs.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative study with a study group comprising 22 patients who were followed up at a minimum of 24 (mean, 41; range, 27-65) months after SCR with dermal allograft performed for structural failure of a previous rotator cuff repair. The control group included 13 patients who previously underwent a primary SCR using dermal allograft and were followed up for 24 months. Clinical outcome measures comprised range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index. Radiological outcomes included the acromiohumeral interval and graft integrity on magnetic resonance imaging at one year. Logistic regression was used to determine whether SCR being undertaken as either a primary or revision procedure influenced functional outcomes or retear rate.

Results

The mean age at the time of surgery was 58 (range, 39-74) years for the study group and 60 (range, 48-70) years for the control group. Forward flexion improved from a mean of 117° (range, 7°-180°) preoperatively to 140° (range, 45°-170°) postoperatively (P = .11), and external rotation increased from a mean of 31° (range, 0°-70°) preoperatively to 36° (range, 0°-60°) postoperatively (P = .23). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved (P = 0) from a mean of 38 (range, 12-68) to 73 (range, 17-95), and the WORC Index improved (P = 0) from a mean of 29 (range, 7-58) to 59 (range, 30-97). Following SCR, there was no significant change in the acromiohumeral interval. The graft was intact in 42% of cases on magnetic resonance imaging and none of the retears underwent further surgery. Compared to revision SCR, primary SCR resulted in a significant improvement in forward flexion (P = .001), external rotation (P = 0), and WORC Index (P = .019). Logistic regression demonstrated that SCR performed as a revision procedure was associated with a higher retear rate (P = .006) and worse forward flexion (P = .009) and external rotation (P = .008).

Conclusion

SCR using human dermal allograft following structural failure of a previous rotator cuff repair can lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes but the results are inferior to primary procedures.

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsule Reconstruction: Acellular Allograft at 45° of Glenohumeral Abduction Improves Glenohumeral Stability, but Fascia Lata Autograft Remains Superior

Originally, fascia lata autograft was used for superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) to restore glenohumeral stability in irreparable rotator cuff tears. Consistently excellent clinical outcomes with low graft tear rates have been reported, without repair of tears in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. On the basis of our experience and studies published in the 15 years since the first SCR using fascia lata autograft in 2007, we can say that this technique is the gold standard. SCR using fascia lata autograft can cover all irreparable rotator cuff tears (Hamada grade 1-3; although the indication for SCR using other grafts, including dermal allograft, biceps, and hamstrings, is only Hamada grade 1 or 2); creates excellent clinical outcomes with low graft tear rates in short-term, long-term, and multicenter studies; regenerates the fibrocartilaginous insertions at both the greater tuberosity and superior glenoid according to histological study; and enables complete restoration of shoulder stability and subacromial contact pressure in cadaveric biomechanical studies. In some countries, dermal allograft is preferred for SCR. However, high rates of graft tear and complications have been reported after SCR using dermal allografts, even in limited indications of irreparable rotator cuff tears (Hamada grade 1 or 2). This high failure rate results from the lack of stiffness and thickness of the dermal allograft. Dermal allografts in SCR can be elongated by 15% after only a couple of physiological shoulder movements, whereas fascia lata graft cannot. This 15% graft elongation, which creates less glenohumeral stability and high graft tear after SCR, is a fatal problem of dermal allograft for SCR in irreparable rotator cuff tears. Current research suggests that SCR using dermal allografts is not strongly recommended for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Dermal allograft probably should be used only for augmentation of rotator cuff complete repair.

Biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears by different graft materials-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCT) are defined as defects that cannot be repaired due to tendon retraction, fat infiltration, or muscle atrophy. One surgical remedy for IRCT is superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), which fixes graft materials between the larger tuberosity and the superior glenoid.

Patients and methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria were followed for conducting the systematic review and meta-analysis. From their inception until February 25, 2022, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library's electronic databases were searched. Studies using cadavers on SCR for IRCT were also included. The humeral head's superior translation and subacromial peak contact pressure were the primary outcomes. The humeral head's anteroposterior translation, the kind of graft material used, its size, and the deltoid load were the secondary outcomes.

Results

After eliminating duplicates from the search results, 1,443 unique articles remained, and 20 papers were finally included in the quantitative research. In 14 investigations, the enhanced superior translation of the humeral head was documented in IRCTs. In 13 studies, a considerable improvement following SCR was found, especially when using fascia lata (FL), which could achieve more translation restraints than human dermal allograft (HDA) and long head of bicep tendon (LHBT). Six investigations reported a subacromial peak contact pressure increase in IRCTs, which could be rectified by SCR, and these studies found a substantial increase in this pressure. The results of the reduction in subacromial peak contact pressure remained consistent regardless of the graft material utilized for SCR. While there was a statistically significant difference in the change of graft material length between FL and HDA, the change in graft material thickness between FL and HDA was not significant. The humeral head's anterior-posterior translation was rising in IRCTs and could be returned to its original state with SCR. In five investigations, IRCTs caused a significant increase in deltoid force. Furthermore, only one study showed that SCR significantly decreased deltoid force.

Conclusion

With IRCT, SCR might significantly decrease the glenohumeral joint's superior and anterior-posterior stability. Despite the risks for donor-site morbidity and the longer recovery time, FL is still the best current option for SCR.

Superior capsule reconstruction, partial cuff repair, graft interposition, arthroscopic debridement or balloon spacers for large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple non-arthroplasty surgical techniques are described for the management of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. There is currently no consensus on the best management strategy. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes following arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic partial cuff repair, superior capsule reconstruction, balloon spacers or graft interposition for the management of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed of the following databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Data were extracted from relevant studies published since January 2000 according to the pre-specified inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the post-operative improvement in shoulder scores. Meta-analysis of the primary outcome was performed. Secondary outcomes included retear rates and complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-two studies were included reporting the outcomes of 2790 shoulders. Fifty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis of the primary outcome. The definition of an irreparable tear varied. All procedures resulted in improved shoulder scores at early follow-up. Shoulder scores declined after 2 years following balloon spacers, arthroscopic debridement and partial cuff repair. High retear rates were seen with partial cuff repairs (45%), graft interposition (21%) and superior capsule reconstruction (21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Large initial improvements in shoulder scores were demonstrated for all techniques despite high retear rates for reconstructive procedures. Shoulder scores may decline at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Early Treatment of Shoulder Pathology Is Necessary but Not Enough Is Being Performed

Delayed treatment of shoulder instability results in bone loss requiring more-complicated surgery, in turn resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Similarly, delayed treatment of repairable rotator cuff tears results in irreparable tears requiring more-complicated surgery and resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Delayed treatment of shoulder pathology is a problem. Solutions include education and research investigation.

A Scoping Review of Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocols After Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is an option for patients with massive or irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Purpose

To describe the literature on rehabilitation protocols after SCR of rotator cuff tears, with emphasis on the timing of the introduction of motion.

Study Design

Scoping review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review of articles published on PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 2020. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess the individual studies. For each article, we summarized the study characteristics, patient demographics, and rehabilitation protocols after SCR: duration of immobilization, initiation of passive range of motion (ROM), active-assisted ROM, active ROM, strengthening, and return to activities. In a subgroup narrative analysis, rehabilitation protocols were stratified by graft type: autograft versus nonautograft (xenograft, allograft, and synthetic).

Results

A total of 21 studies met the search criteria. Six studies had level 3 evidence and 15 had level 4 evidence; 16 studies were considered high quality according to the MINORS score. After SCR, an abduction immobilizer was recommended for a duration of 3 to 6 weeks. Of the 21 studies, 7 (33%) started passive ROM during the first week, and 5 reported strict immobilization without motion for up to 6 weeks. All 8 studies that reported return-to-sports timing recommended delaying return until at least 6 months postoperatively. Passive ROM was recommended earlier for patients with nonautograft versus autograft (χ2 = 225; P < .001). There was a high level of heterogeneity in the rehabilitation protocols after SCR.

Conclusion

The majority of published protocols were descriptive. At present, there is little agreement on the published rehabilitation guidelines after SCR, precluding specific clinical best practice suggestions. Although there was a tendency of recommending early motion in nonautograft cases, the optimal protocols based on graft healing and functional outcomes require further verification based on the clinical outcomes from high-quality studies.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Results in Significant Improvements in Patient Reported Outcomes and Range of Motion: A Systematic Review

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcomes (with the minimum mean follow-up period of 2 years) of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) using different grafts for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) and to explore whether margin convergence in ASCR affects range of motion (ROM) outcomes.

Methods

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO and was then conducted following PRISMA guidelines by searching the databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database before April 2021. These literature searches investigating the clinical outcomes of ASCR were included. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. The data, including margin convergence, patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and complications, were extracted and analyzed. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) criteria was used to define clinical significance.

Results

15 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported statistically significant improvements in visual analog scale scores (range: 2.07 to 7.1) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (range: 18.1 to 58). Significant improvements of Constant scores were noted in 4 of 5 reporting studies (mean improvement ranged from 14.64 to 50.79). Active forward flexion/elevation (11 studies), active abduction (4 studies), and active external rotation (8 studies) displayed improvements in all reporting studies, with mean changes ranging from 12 to 73.68, 19 to 89.21, and 1 to 24.74, respectively. The mean change of postoperative acromiohumeral distance ranged from −0.86 mm to 3.2 mm in 9 studies. The postoperative complication rate of ASCR ranged from 4.5% to 47.6%. The anterior margin convergence in SCR was associated with a relatively poor improvement in active external rotation.

Conclusions

ASCR contributes to significant improvements in patient-reported clinical outcomes and ROM at follow-up after a mean of more than two years, emerging as a viable option for patients with MIRCTs. The anterior margin convergence should be prudently chosen, especially in ASCR using fascia lata autograft, on account of the probable restriction on postoperative active external rotation.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Acromial and humeral head osteolysis following superior capsular reconstruction using autologous tensor fascia lata graft

BACKGROUND

Graft tear is a critical complication following superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) as it directly links with clinical outcomes. No previous reports have described acromial and humeral head osteolysis following SCR. Acromial and humeral head osteolysis may incidentally occur after SCR using autologous tensor fascia lata graft. This study aimed to demonstrate the incidence of osteolysis following SCR using autologous tensor fascia lata graft and investigate the factors that affect osteolysis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears between June 2014 and June 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups-those with no osteolysis and those with osteolysis-and were compared. For subanalysis, patients in the osteolysis group were further divided into 3 groups according to the location of the osteolysis-acromial osteolysis, humeral head osteolysis, and acromial and humeral head osteolysis-to clarify the factors determining the location of osteolyses. The shoulder range of motion was evaluated preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. Additionally, the following items were evaluated: condition of the subscapularis tendon, Hamada classification (grade 2 or 3), critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral distance measured preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively, graft size, and graft thickness. In addition, the graft condition was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

In total, 57 patients were enrolled and followed up for a minimum of 2 years (follow-up rate, 92% [57 of 62 cases]). Overall, the incidence of osteolysis following SCR was 35.1% (20 of 57 cases; acromial osteolysis in 7, humeral head osteolysis in 3, and acromial and humeral head osteolysis in 10). Compared with the group with no osteolysis, the osteolysis group had no inferior clinical outcomes or higher graft tear rates. The proportions of Hamada grade 3 (P = .041) and involvement of the subscapularis tendon (P = .020) were significantly higher in the osteolysis group. The relative risks of subscapularis involvement and Hamada grade 3 for osteolysis were 2.9 and 5.1, respectively. In the subanalysis, the factors determining the location of the osteolysis could not be clarified.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that the progression of the Hamada classification and condition of the subscapularis tendon affect the occurrence of osteolyses. However, these osteolyses were not associated with clinical outcomes, including graft tear rate and shoulder range of motion.

Superior capsular reconstruction - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since Mihata's 2012 proposal to arthroscopically reconstruct the superior capsule of patients with massive irreparable cuff tears, many studies have reported the clinical results of this technique using different types of grafts (fascia lata autograft, dermal allograft, porcine dermal xenograft or long head of biceps autograft).

PURPOSE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to report the clinical and radiological results of these superior capsule reconstructions.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) recommendations were used to conduct this systematic review. A bibliographic search was performed of the electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the MINORS criterion (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies). The inclusion criteria were studies in English evaluating superior capsular reconstruction.

RESULTS

No level I or II studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies were selected from the 97 identified, including 637 shoulders (64% male) with a mean age of 62 years [95% CI: 60.3-63.5]. At the mean follow-up of 24.3 months (12-60), the range of motion was significantly increased from 82.6° [60.0-105.2] to 141.9° [109.9-173.8] in abduction, from 113.1° [98.3-127.9] to 153.3° [147.4-159.2] in elevation, from 35.5° [30.9-40.2] 43.4° [35.4-51.3] in external rotation and from 7.2 [5.4-9] to 9.9 [8.9-10.9] in internal rotation. Functional scores were significantly improved from 5.4 [4.8-5.9] to 1.3 [0.9-1.7] points for VAS, from 42.5 [15.7-69.3] to 59.3 [30.1-88.6] points for Constant, from 39.0% [38.1-39.8] to 79.8% [76.4-83.3] for the SSV, and from 48.2 [45.2-51.1] to 81.2 [77.2-85.1] points for the ASES. The healing rate was 76.1% [64.4-84.9]. The complication rate was 5.6% [1.8-16.3] and the reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rate was 7.1% [3.8-12.8].

CONCLUSION

Superior capsule reconstructions allow satisfactory clinical and radiological results to be obtained at 2 years of follow-up. Due to the small number of high quality comparative studies available, its true place in the therapeutic arsenal cannot be fully confirmed. However, it seems that the best indication for this technique is isolated irreparable rupture of the supraspinatus, in cases of medical treatment failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; meta-analysis of heterogeneous studies.

Advancement in Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tear

Irreparable massive rotator cuff tear (IMRCT) was one of the causes of shoulder dysfunction, despite technical improvement, the failure rate of IMRCT was still demonstrated to be high. Traditional treatments like non-surgical treatments, partial rotator cuff repair, and tendon transfers could only achieve a slight improvement. A potential cause for high failure rate was the fact that traditional treatments cannot restore the superior stability of glenohumeral joint, and thus restricted the movement of shoulder joint severely. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a variety of grafts (autograft, allograft, xenograft, or synthetic grafts) provided a promising option for IMRCT. In surgery, graft was fixed medially to superior glenoid and laterally to the footprint of humeral greater tuberosity. SCR could increase the stability of the superior glenohumeral joint, decrease the subacromial pressure and acromiohumeral distance. This review summarized the relevant literature regarding the alternative grafts, surgery indications, operative techniques and clinical outcomes of SCR. we compared the different grafts, key surgical steps, the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical methods to provide clinicians with new surgical insights into the treatments of IMRCT. In conclusion, IMRCT without severe glenohumeral arthritis was the best suitable indication for SCR. The clinical outcomes were positive in the short-term and middle-term following-up. More studies were necessary to determine long-term results of this surgical procedure.

Subacromial spacer implantation: an alternative to arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review evaluated and compared the use of a subacromial spacer implantation (SSI) with arthroscopic superior capsular repair (ASCR) in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) with an assessment of clinical and imaging outcomes.

SOURCES OF DATA

This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched in PubMed, Medline and Embase database literature using the keywords 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon', 'subacromial device', 'arthroscopy', 'superior capsular reconstruction', 'irreparable rotator cuff tears', 'satisfaction' and 'quality of life'.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

We included a total of 29 articles (14 about SSI and 15 about ASCR) dealing with outcomes, satisfaction and patients' quality of life.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The use of a subacromial spacer showed similar results in terms of patients' satisfaction and quality of life when compared with ASCR.

GROWING POINTS

SSI can be implanted quickly and has a low complication rate. It can therefore be considered a good alternative for the management of MIRCTs.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

The subacromial spacer is a biodegradable implant easily implanted at arthroscopy. It can lead good clinical and imaging outcomes in MIRCTs. Similarly, ASCR can be performed with either an autograft or synthetic allograft transplantation, with satisfactory results. Long-term prospective studies are needed to compare SSI and ASCR to verify their effectiveness.

Perioperative anaesthetic considerations for rotator cuff repair surgeries: A current concept review

Surgeries for Rotator Cuff (RC) pathologies are required for either trauma or degenerative related aetiologies. Various surgical techniques from open to arthroscopic repair, are being undertaken by orthopaedic surgeons. Peri-operative anaesthetic management of the patients undergoing rotator cuff repair requires understanding the surgical procedure and patient status for optimal anaesthetic planning. Such management mandates a thorough pre-operative evaluation, including clinical history, examination, and relevant investigations. Patients with acute trauma associated Rotator Cuff (RC) tears should be assessed for visceral injuries using appropriate injury evaluation systems before such repairs. On the other hand, patients with degenerative tears tend to be older with associated comorbidities. Hence pre-operative optimisation is necessary according to risk stratification. Anaesthetic techniques for Rotator Cuff (RC) surgery include general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia. These are individualised according to patient assessment and surgical procedure planned. Knowledge of relevant surgical anatomy is essential for intra-operative, and post-operative neural blockade techniques since optimal peri-operative analgesia improve overall patient recovery. The occurrence of a peri-operative complication should be recognised as timely management improves the patient-related surgical outcomes. We describe the relevance of surgical anatomy, the effect of patient positioning, irrigating fluids, various anaesthetic techniques and an overview of regional and medical interventions to manage pain in patients undergoing for Rotator Cuff (RC) surgery.