Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: its place in the spectrum of pulmonary carcinoma

Mutational analysis of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: APC gene mutations identify a good prognostic factor

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm with biological heterogeneity. Mutations in multiple genes have been identified in LCNEC. However, associations between gene alterations, histopathological characteristics, and prognosis remain ambiguous. Here, we investigated the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genomic characteristics of 19 patients with LCNEC and 9 patients with atypical carcinoid (AC). We revealed high mutation frequencies of TP53 (89.5 %), RB1 (42.1 %), APC (31.6 %), and MCL1 (31.6 %) in LCNEC, while genetic alterations were rarely found in AC. APC alterations mainly occurred to the exon 16 and were only identified in LCNEC with wild-type RB1. The 19 LCNEC were further subgrouped into APC wild-type (LCNEC-APCMT, 6/19) and APC-mutated (LCNEC-APCWT, 13/19) subgroups. In comparison with LCNEC-APCWT, LCNEC-APCMT displayed lower TMB (median: 12.64 vs 4.20, P = 0.045), and relatively mild cytologic atypia. In addition, LCNEC-APCMT distinguished itself from AC and LCNEC-APCWT by obviously downregulated expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56 and Syn, P < 0.01) and significantly altered expression of genes downstream of APC (β-catenin migrating into the cytoplasm and nucleus, P < 0.001; c-Myc upregulating, P = 0.005). The OS of LCNEC-APCMT was numerically intermediate between AC and LCNEC-APCWT. We first proposed that APC alterations were common in LCNEC with wild-type RB1 and that LCNEC-APCMT was associated with lower TMB and better OS in comparison with LCNEC-APCWT.

Real-World comprehensive genomic profiling data for diagnostic clarity in pulmonary Large-Cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an uncommon subtype of lung cancer believed to represent a spectrum of tumors sharing characteristics of both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Other groups have proposed genomic LCNEC subtypes, including small cell-like, non-small cell-like, and carcinoid-like subtypes. The primary goal of this study was to better define the NSCLC-like subtype with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP).

METHODS

An institutional database was queried to identify tissue specimens (TBx, N = 1,426) and liquid biopsies (LBx, N = 39) submitted for CGP during routine clinical care (8/2014 - 7/2023) with a disease ontology of LCNEC. TBx were profiled with FoundationOne® (F1) or F1CDx, using hybrid-capture technology to detect genomic alterations (GAs).

RESULTS

1,426 LCNEC samples were genomically profiled. The presence of RB1 and TP53 genomic alterations (GAs) were used to define a SCLC-like subtype (n = 557). A carcinoid-like group was defined by the presence of MEN1 mutation in the absence of TP53 GAs (n = 25). The remaining 844 samples were compared to the SCLC-like group and GAs enriched relative to the SCLC-like samples with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.0001 were used to define a NSCLC-like group. These NSCLC-like subtype-defining GAs included SMARCA4, KRAS, FGF3/4/19, STK11, CDKN2A/B, MTAP, and CCND1. Under this schema, 530 samples were classified as NSCLC-like and 314 remained unclassified.

CONCLUSIONS

Large-scale CGP can better characterize biologically distinct molecular subtypes in LCNEC. Further studies to define how these molecular subtypes may help inform treatment decisions in this complex and challenging malignancy are warranted.

Morphologic and Molecular Heterogeneity of Cervical Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Report of 14 Cases

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the cervix are rare aggressive tumors associated with poor prognosis and only limited treatment options. Although there is some literature on molecular underpinnings of cervical small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCNECs), detailed morphologic and associated molecular characteristics of cervical NENs remains to be elucidated. Herein, 14 NENs (SCNEC: 6, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma [LCNEC]: 6, neuroendocrine tumor [NET]: 2), including 5 admixed with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated adenocarcinoma (carcinoma admixed with neuroendocrine carcinoma) were analyzed. All except 3 SCNECs were HPV16/18 positive. TP53 (3) and/or RB1 (4) alterations (3 concurrent) were only seen in SCNECs (4/6) and were enriched in the HPV16/18-negative tumors. The other most common molecular changes in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) overlapping with those reported in the literature for cervical carcinomas involved PI3K/MAPK pathway (4) and MYC (4) and were seen in both SCNECs and LCNECs. In contrast, the 2 NETs lacked any significant alterations. Two LCNECs admixed with adenocarcinoma had enough material to sequence separately each component. In both pathogenic alterations were shared between the 2 components, including ERBB2 amplification in one and an MSH6 mutation with MYC amplification in the other. Overall, these findings suggest that cervical HPV-associated NETs are genomically silent and high-grade NECs (regardless of small or large cell morphology) share molecular pathways with common cervical carcinomas as it has been reported in the endometrium and are different from NECs at other sites. Molecular analysis of these highly malignant neoplasms might inform the clinical management for potential therapeutic targets.

Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of malignant pulmonary tumor. The incidence rate of LCNEC was reported to be 0.3%–3% in lung cancers. Although LCNEC is classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is more aggressive and malignant than other NSCLC, and its biological behavior is similar to that of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Most of the LCNEC patients are elderly smoking male and the clinical manifestations are not specific. The imaging manifestations of the tumors are often located in the periphery and the upper lobes, and the enlargement of mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes is common. The diagnosis is mainly based on pathology by the histological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Specific neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin A (CgA), synaptophysin (Syn) and CD56 are usually diffusely positive in LCNEC, and found that insulinoma-associated protein (INSM1) and high rate of Ki-67 are helpful for diagnosis. More differential diagnoses also increase the difficulty of correctly diagnosing LCNEC. The rise of LCNEC molecular typing in recent years may be helpful for diagnosis and subsequent treatment. This review focuses on the epidemiological features, imaging studies, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of LCNEC.

Neuronal survival factor VGF promotes chemoresistance and predicts poor prognosis in lung cancers with neuroendocrine feature

High-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung consist of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Both exhibit aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. The transformation of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) to SCLC or LCNEC also contributes to acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Despite initially being responsive to chemotherapy, high-grade NET patients inevitably develop drug resistance; thus, novel therapeutic targets are urgently needed for these patients. This study reported that VGF (nerve growth factor inducible), a factor mainly expressed in neurons during neural development, is highly expressed in SCLC and LCNEC as well as in a subset of ADCs, whereas targeting VGF attenuates cancer cell growth and tumor formation. High VGF expression was associated with advanced stage SCLC and predicted poor prognosis in lung ADC. In addition, EGFR-TKI selection enriched VGF expression in TKI-resistant ADC under epigenetic control. The VGF locus possessed the HDAC1 binding site, and treatment of ADC cells with the HDAC1 inhibitor induced VGF expression. High VGF expression was associated with chemoresistance, and silencing VGF induced BMF and BCL2L11 expression and rendered lung cancer cells sensitive to chemotherapy drugs. These findings suggested the potential of VGF as a prognostic factor and therapeutic target in lung cancers with neuroendocrine feature. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Based on SEER Database: Population Distribution, Survival Analysis, and Prognostic Factors of Organ Metastasis of Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Background

The incidence rate of lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) in lung cancer is low, but the malignancy is high and the prognosis is poor. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine the population distribution of organ metastasis in LCNEC, conduct survival analysis, judge prognostic factors, and provide direction for follow-up diagnosis and treatment.

Materials and methods

By logging into the SEER database, the data of lung LCNEC were retrieved and the target population was selected. According to the presence or absence of organ metastasis (bone, brain, liver, and lung), we divided the target population into the no organ metastasis group (n = 1,202) and the organ metastasis group (n = 870). By analyzing the clinicopathological data of patients and using the survival function, the corresponding median survival time was obtained, and the influencing factors of each group were analyzed. Then, the significant influencing factors were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression analysis to screen out the independent influencing factors.

Result

In the overall sample group, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that sex, age, primary site surgery, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. The 1-year survival rate was 13.8% in the bone metastasis group, 19.1% in the brain metastasis group, 13.8% in the liver metastasis group, and 20.3% in the intrapulmonary metastasis group. In the organ metastasis group, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that sex, chemotherapy, radiotherapy sequence with surgery, primary site surgery, liver metastasis, and age at diagnosis were independent factors affecting the prognosis.

Conclusion

In the overall sample of LCNEC, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, and liver metastasis all reduced the overall survival time, while the effect of intrapulmonary metastasis on the overall survival time was not statistically significant. Sex, chemotherapy, radiotherapy sequence with surgery, primary site surgery, liver metastasis, and age were independent factors affecting the prognosis of the LCNEC organ metastasis group. Women, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy sequence with surgery were favorable factors, while old age, liver metastasis, and male were unfavorable factors.

Peripapillary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Metastasis: A Novel Approach to Treatment

Peripapillary and circumpapillary retinal intraocular metastases are rare and present a treatment challenge for ophthalmologists because of the high risk of iatrogenic injury to the optic nerve. There are no clear guidelines on the management of these lesions, and many clinicians will initially observe for improvement of the metastases with systemic chemotherapy before considering local therapy with external beam radiation. Radiation to the optic disc carries a significant risk of injuring the optic nerve, leading to worsening of vision. Alternative treatment approaches are needed. We present a patient with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with metastasis to the peripapillary retina who was treated with intravitreal topotecan and with intravitreal aflibercept. Serial fundus photos, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography demonstrated a reduction in size of the lesion and a decrease in subretinal fluid with intravitreal topotecan and aflibercept. In addition, visual acuity was stabilized during treatment. Intravitreal chemotherapy for intraocular metastases in vision-sensitive areas such as the peripapillary retina may be a viable alternative for patients who seek to preserve their vision and maintain their quality of life.

Treatment of Advanced-Stage Large Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer (LCNEC) of the Lung: A Tale of Two Diseases

LCNEC of the lung comprises a small proportion of pulmonary malignancies. Traditionally, they have been classified based on histologic and immunohistochemistry characteristics with features of small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. The treatment outcome of advanced-stage LCNEC of the lung is poor with response rates ranging from 34 to 46% with platinum doublets, median progression-free survival (mPFS) ranging between 4.4 and 5.8 m, and median overall survival (mOS) ranging from 8 to 12.6 m. The optimal treatment strategy for LCNEC is debated given limited data and different outcomes based on chemotherapy type reported in the available literature. Recently, genomic profiling with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has been able to sub-classify LCNEC as SCLC-like or NSCLC-like. Treatment based on this sub-classification has improved outcomes by using SCLC and NSCLC regimens based on their genomic profile in retrospective analysis. Future studies in LCNEC of the lung should incorporate this new molecular sub-classification as stratification and possibly include SCLC-like LCNEC into SCLC studies and NSCLC-like into NSCLC studies.

Identification of novel transcription factor-microRNA-mRNA co-regulatory networks in pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Background

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare neuroendocrine neoplasm. Previous studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) are widely involved in tumor regulation through targeting critical genes. However, it is unclear which miRNAs play vital roles in the pathogenesis of LCNEC, and how they interact with transcription factors (TFs) to regulate cancer-related genes.

Methods

To determine the novel TF-miRNA-target gene feed-forward loop (FFL) model of LCNEC, we integrated multi-omics data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), Transcriptional Regulatory Relationships Unraveled by Sentence-Based Text Mining (TRRUST), Transcriptional Regulatory Element Database (TRED), and The experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions database (miRTarBase database). First, expression profile datasets for mRNAs (GSE1037) and miRNAs (GSE19945) were downloaded from the GEO database. Overlapping differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were identified through integrative analysis. The target genes of the FFL were obtained from the miRTarBase database, and the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional enrichment analyses were performed on the target genes. Then, we screened for key miRNAs in the FFL and performed gene regulatory network analysis based on key miRNAs. Finally, the TF-miRNA-target gene FFLs were constructed by the hypergeometric test.

Results

A total of 343 DEGs and 60 DEMs were identified in LCNEC tissues compared to normal tissues, including 210 down-regulated and 133 up-regulated genes, and 29 down-regulated and 31 up-regulated miRNAs. Finally, the regulatory network of TF-miRNA-target gene was established. The key regulatory network modules included ETS1-miR195-CD36, TAOK1-miR7-1-3P-GRIA1, E2F3-miR195-CD36, and TEAD1-miR30A-CTHRC1.

Conclusions

We constructed the TF-miRNA-target gene regulatory network, which is helpful for understanding the complex LCNEC regulatory mechanisms.

Challenges in Ki-67 assessments in pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas

AIMS

To gather the best available evidence regarding Ki-67% values in large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and determine whether certain cut-off values could serve as a prognostic feature in LCNEC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo, eSlide Manager and ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems) were used to measure Ki-67% in 77 resected LCNEC diagnosed by World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria. Cases were stratified into six classes by 10% Ki-67 increments. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, overall (OS) and disease-free survivals (DFS) were compared by AJCC stage, by six Ki-67% classes and with Ki-67% cut-points ≥20% and ≥40%. Tumours were from 0.9 to 11.5 cm and pathological stages 1-3. The system measured Ki-67% positivity using 4072-44 533 tumour nuclei per case (mean 16610 ± 8039). Ki-67% ranged from 1 to 64% (mean = 26%; median = 26%). Only 16 (21%) tumours had Ki-67% ≥40%. OS ranged from 1 to 298 months (median follow-up = 25 months). DFS ranged from 1 to 276 months (median follow-up = 9 months). OS and DFS differed across AJCC stage (overall log-rank P = 0.038 and P = 0.037). However, neither OS nor DFS significantly correlated with Ki-67% when six or two classes were used with either ≥20% Ki-67 or ≥40% Ki-67 as cut-point. A literature review identified 14 reports meeting our inclusion criteria with ≥10 LCNEC. Reported Ki-67% ranged from 2% to 100%. Problems contributing to variability in Ki-67% measurements are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings caution against a blanket use of 20%, 40% or other Ki-67% cut-points for LCNEC diagnosis or prognostication.

Long-term survivor of pulmonary combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with nivolumab

Several authors have previously reported that patients with pulmonary combined large cell neuroendocrine cancer ( LCNEC) have a poor prognosis and there is no consensus on the treatment strategy for combined LCNEC as well as LCNEC. Here, we report the case of a long‐term survivor with pulmonary combined LCNEC. The patient was a 60‐year‐old man who underwent thoracoscopic right lower lobectomy. The final histopathology and staging of the tumor showed LCNEC combined with squamous cell carcinoma and T2aN0M0 stage IB. Multimodality treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery for several recurrences were performed after the pulmonary surgery. After immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with nivolumab, all the metastatic lesions shrunk and a partial response was maintained at five years after the first surgery. In our case, ICI after multimodality therapy combining cytotoxic anticancer drugs and radiotherapy was effective in LCNEC with metachronous multiple metastases.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

Immune checkpoint inhibitor after multimodality therapy combining cytotoxic anticancer drugs and radiotherapy was effective in LCNEC with metachronous multiple metastases. The patient survived over five‐years after the first surgery.

What this study adds

Immune checkpoint inhibitor may be effective in some LCNEC patients.

Outcomes of Patients with Clinical Stage I-IIIA Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer Treated with Resection

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. The rationale of the study was to determine the survival of LCNEC patients in I–IIIA clinical stages who underwent resection. A total of 53 LCNEC (89%) and combined LCNEC (11%) patients in stages I–IIIA who underwent surgery with radical intent between 2002–2018 were included in the current study. Overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) were estimated. Uni- and multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox-regression model. Patients were treated with surgery alone (51%), surgery with radiochemotherapy (4%), with radiotherapy (2%), with adjuvant chemotherapy (41%), or with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (2%). The median (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) OS and TTR was 52 months (20.1–102.1 months) and 20 months (7.0–75.6 months), respectively. Patients treated in clinical stage I showed better OS than patients in stages II–IIIA (p = 0.008). Patients with R0 resection margin (negative margin, no tumor at the margin) and without lymph node metastasis had significantly better TTR. In the multivariate analysis, age was an independent factor influencing OS. Recurrence within 1 year was noted in more than half cases of LCNEC. R0 resection margin and N0 status (no lymph node metastasis) were factors improving TTR. Age >64 years was observed as a main independent factor influencing OS.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: clinicopathological and molecular features

In 1970, neuroendocrine tumors of the lung were classified into three categories: typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). The third edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 1999 defined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) as a variant of large cell carcinomas, whereas the fourth edition of the WHO classification redefined LCNEC as a neuroendocrine tumor. Currently, neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are classified into four main categories: TC, AC, LCNEC, and SCLC. Although the treatments for TC, AC, and SCLC have not changed remarkably, the treatment strategy for LCNEC is not yet established because of its reclassification from a variant of "large cell carcinoma" to a new category of "neuroendocrine tumor". In this review article, we discuss the pathological findings, biological behavior, and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung.

Outcomes for Surgery in Large Cell Lung Neuroendocrine Cancer

INTRODUCTION

There are limited small, single-institution observational studies examining the role of surgery in large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC). We investigated the outcomes of surgery for stage I to IIIA LCNEC by using the National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Patients with stage I to IIIA LCNEC were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) and grouped by treatment: definitive chemoradiation versus surgery. Overall survival, by stage, was the primary outcome. Outcomes of surgical patients were also compared with those of patients with SCLC or other non-small cell histotypes.

RESULTS

A total of 6092 patients met the criteria: 96%, 94%, 75%, and 62% of patients received an operation for stage I, II, IIIA, and cN2 disease, respectively. Complete resection was achieved in at least 85% of patients. The 5-year survival rates for patients undergoing an operation for stage I and II LCNEC were 50% and 45%, respectively. Surgical patients with stage IIIA and N2 disease had 36% and 32% 5-year survival rates, respectively. When compared with stereotactic body radiation in stage I disease and chemoradiation in patients with stage II to IIIA disease, surgery was associated with a survival benefit. Patients with LCNEC who underwent an operation generally experienced worse survival by stage than did those with adenocarcinoma but experienced improved survival compared with patients with SCLC. Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved survival for pathologic stage II to IIIA disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is associated with reasonable outcomes for stage I to IIA LCNEC, although survival is generally worse than for adenocarcinoma. Surgery should be offered to medically fit patients with both early and locally advanced LCNEC, with guideline-concordant induction or adjuvant therapy.

Disparity in clinical outcomes between pure and combined pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The 2015 World Health Organization classification defines pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) as a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. However, the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of pure LCNEC and combined LCNEC remain unclear. Hence, we performed a multi-center retrospective study to compare the clinical outcomes of pure versus combined LCNEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 381 patients with pulmonary LCNEC admitted to 17 Chinese institutes between 2009 and 2016 were collected retrospectively. Clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed among patients receiving adjuvant (adjuvant group; n = 56) and first-line (first-line group; n = 146) chemotherapy, as well as among patients receiving small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-SCLC (NSCLC) chemotherapy regimens. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify clinicopathological variables that might influence patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Expression levels of neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin-A, CD56) were associated with patients' prognosis in the total study cohort. In the adjuvant group, median disease-free survival was non-significantly longer for SCLC-based regimens than for NSCLC-based regimens (P = 0.112). In the first-line group, median progression-free survival was significantly longer for SCLC-based regimens than for NSCLC-based regimens (11.5 vs. 7.2 months, P = 0.003). Among patients with combined LCNEC, adenocarcinoma was the most common combined component, accounting for 70.0 % of cases. Additionally, median overall survival was non-significantly shorter for combined LCNEC than for pure LCNEC (P = 0.083).

CONCLUSION

The SCLC regimen is a more effective choice, as either first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy, when compared to the NSCLC regimen for LCNEC treatment. Further studies are needed to clarify the survival differences between patients with pure-, and combined LCNEC.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver metastasis of lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an aggressive and a rare type of lung cancer, and the prognosis of LCNEC with distant metastasis is extremely poor, with a five-year survival rate of 0%. Here, we report a case of laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver metastasis of lung LCNEC.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 63-year-old man received a routine physical examination, and abnormal chest radiographic findings were observed; chest computed tomography (CT) in our hospital revealed that the patient had left pneumothorax and a lesion measuring 18 mm in the inferior lingular segment of the lung. The patient underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, and the final pathological diagnosis was lung LCNEC. Four years after surgery, abdominal CT revealed a mass measuring 27 mm in the liver. The patient underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, and postoperative pathological examination showed liver metastasis of LCNEC. There was no sign of recurrence 6 months after hepatectomy.

DISCUSSION

LCNEC with distant metastasis has a poor response to systemic chemotherapy, and the median survival time of patients with distant metastasis is estimated to be approximately 6 months, with a five-year survival rate of 0%. Although the common site of metastasis from LCNEC is the liver, there are no previous reports of hepatectomy for liver metastasis of LCNEC.

CONCLUSION

We report a case of laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver metastasis of lung LCNEC. It is suggested that surgical resection for solitary distant metastasis of LCNEC may improve prognosis.

Prognostic significance of the pattern of pathological N1 lymph node metastases for non-small cell lung cancer

Background

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the pathologic lymph node status N1 is a heterogeneous entity, and different forms of lymph node involvement may represent different prognoses. For methodological reasons, the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for NSCLC makes no official changes to the N descriptor. However, there is evidence that different subforms of N1 disease are associated with different prognoses, and it is now recommended that clinicians record the number of affected lymph nodes and nodal stations for further analyses. In this investigation we sought to determine whether patients with different levels and types of N1 lymph node involvement had significantly different 5-year survival rates.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 90 patients with NSCLC (61 men, 29 women), who were treated between 2008 and 2012 and found to have pathologic N1 lymph node involvement and tumor sizes corresponding to T1 or T2. All patients were treated in curative intent with surgical lung resection and systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection.

Results

The overall 5-year survival rate was 56.3%. In the univariate analysis, lower tumor stage and tumor histology other than large-cell carcinoma were significantly associated with better long-term survival. Patients with solitary lymph node metastases also had longer disease-free survival than those with multiple nodal metastases. In the multivariate analysis, large-cell carcinoma and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage IIB were independently associated with worse survival, while pneumonectomy, compared to lobar or sublobar resection, was independently associated with better survival.

Conclusions

Although we did not observe significant prognostic differences between N1 subcategories within our patient population, other analyses may yield different results. Therefore, these data highlight the need for large, well-designed multicenter studies to confirm the clinical significance of N1 subcategories.

Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Early Large Cell Lung Neuroendocrine Cancer: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines do not routinely recommend adjuvant therapy for resected stage I large cell lung neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC). However, data regarding the role of adjuvant therapy in early LCNEC are limited. This National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis was performed to improve the evidence guiding adjuvant therapy for early LCNEC.

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) of patients with pathologic T1-2a N0 M0 LCNEC who underwent resection in the NCDB from 2003 to 2015 was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Patients who died within 30 days of surgery and with more than R0 resection were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 2642 patients meeting study criteria, 481 (18%) received adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB patients was associated with a significant increase in OS (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.90). However, there was no significant difference in survival between adjuvant chemotherapy and no adjuvant therapy for stage IA LCNEC (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.11). Adjuvant radiotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy, was not associated with a change in OS. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after lobar resection for stage IB LCNEC had a significant survival benefit compared with patients not receiving adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In early-stage LCNEC, adjuvant chemotherapy appears to confer an additional overall survival advantage only in patients with completely resected stage IB LCNEC and not for patients with completely resected stage IA LCNEC.

CD146 promotes migration and proliferation in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma cell lines

Dysregulated expression of the cell surface protein, CD146, has been implicated in various types of cancer in humans, including in lung cancer. The present study aimed to clarify the mechanism underlying abnormal CD146 expression in human pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) cell lines (NCI-H460 and NCI-H810). The functions of CD146 were investigated by measuring cell migration and viability following CD146 knockdown or overexpression via small interference RNA and plasmid transfection. The findings demonstrated that decreased protein expression of CD146 could inhibit migration and viability in LCNEC cells. Furthermore, CD146 was determined to influence the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers (epithelial cadherin, vimentin and Snail) and promoted AKT phosphorylation. The present results imply CD146 may function in the migration and proliferation of pulmonary LCNEC cells.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: A five-year retrospective experience of Egyptian NCI (2010-2014)

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) encompasses low grade typical carcinoid (TC), intermediate grade atypical carcionid (AC) and high grade, both large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with extreme differences in management and survival.

OBJECTIVE

To study clinicopathologic and prognostic factors affecting survival of lung NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study evaluating 35 patients with primary lung NETs treated at National Cancer Institute of Egypt (NCI-E) between January 2010 and December 2014. Pathological diagnosis depended on definite morphology and positivity to at least one of the neuroendocrine markers by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53 ± 11.2 years with male predominance. Performance status (PS) I was encountered in 48.6%. SCLC was the prevalent histology in 68.6%, followed by LCNEC & TC in 20 & 11.4%, respectively. Curative surgery was employed in 100 & 57% of TC & LCNEC patients, respectively. Stage IV was anticipated in 87.5 & 43% of SCLC & LCNEC, respectively. For the entire cohort, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.0 and 13.7 months, respectively, whereas the 3-year EFS and OS were 17.8 & 20%, respectively. SCLC patients showed significantly the worst OS compared to other NETs (p = 0.001). Patients who presented with stage IV and PS > I demonstrated significantly shorter OS than those with locoregional and PS I (p = 0.00001 &p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SCLC subtype, stage IV and initial PS > I are poor prognostic factors for lung NETs associated with shorter survival. This conclusion needs to be confirmed by larger studies.

Small or Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based Therapy for Treatment of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer of The Lung? University of Cincinnati Experience

Large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) of the lung exhibits morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of both neuroendocrine and large cell carcinomas. No defined optimal therapy has been described for this subset of patients and the question of whether these patients should be treated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment protocols, according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, or with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to histological and clinical similarities is still uncertain. We conducted a retrospective review of patients identified with diagnosis of LCNEC of the lung at the University of Cincinnati Cancer Center from the year 2002 to 2012 to determine which treatment approach resulted in improved outcomes in this rare category of disease. Patients who received chemotherapy whether NSCLC (group A) or SCLC (group B) protocols did not show significant changes in OS (P=0.911). Meanwhile, patients who underwent surgery (group C) had better OS compared to groups A and B (P= 0.027 and 0.024, respectively). This analysis reveals that outcomes for SCLC or NSCLC treatment strategies in LCNEC patients did not result in survival advantages and future research should be addressing it as a separate entity.

Clinical Presentation and Treatment Options for Clear Cell Lung Cancer: University of Cincinnati A Case Series and Literature Review of Clear Cell Lung Cancer

Clear cell carcinomas are common finding in renal, ovarian and uterine carcinomas. However, clear cell lung cancer (CCLC), first described by Liebow and Castleman in 1963, is considered an extremely rare variant of lung tumors. The 2011 WHO classification of lung tumors considered CCLC as a rare cytologic feature of squamous cell or adenocarcinomas. It is no longer recognized as a formal subtype, albeit it can be referred to in the pathological diagnosis as “with clear cell features” even with marginal fractions of the tumor cells. Such recognition is needed since the variation in clinical features and outcome in this subset of patients. The disease has a clinically vague natural history, is characterized by slight female predominance and is often seen in the elderly. As frequently encountered with rare diseases, its clinical course and treatment options have many questions still yet to be answered. In this paper, we review both the natural history and treatment options mentioned in literature, in the light of our experience by reporting a case series of four patients diagnosed with CCLC and highlight their aspects.

Perioperative chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin for pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Background

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is associated with poor prognosis, and its treatment strategy is still controversial, especially regarding chemotherapy regimens.

Case report

We present the case of a 49-year-old Chinese male with primary pulmonary LCNEC treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed. A suspected quasi-circular mass in the left lower pulmonary lobe and an enlarged mediastinal lymph node were found. The patient was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation based on computerized tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. An EGFR gene mutation test showed negative results. Cisplatin and pemetrexed were administered as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. The primary lesion had reduced markedly, and the enlarged mediastinal lymph node had disappeared after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A left lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed. The lesion was confirmed as LCNEC based on postoperative histopathological analysis and immunohistochemical results. The patient underwent four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed for a month postoperatively, followed by postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. The patient was still alive after a follow-up of 24 months, with no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Cisplatin combined with pemetrexed is effective and safe for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma: results from the European Society for Thoracic Surgeons Lung Neuroendocrine Tumours Retrospective Database

OBJECTIVES

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNC) is a rare tumour characterized by aggressive biological behaviour and poor prognosis. Due to its rarity and the lack of randomized clinical trials, the best treatment is still under debate. Some recent reports indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) may have a beneficial effect on survival. Our goal was to evaluate this finding using a large series of patients with neuroendocrine tumours obtained from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

METHODS

Data for 400 patients with LCNC operated on in 14 thoracic surgery institutions worldwide between 1992 and 2014 were collected retrospectively. Overall survival was the primary endpoint; we used a multivariable Cox regression model to evaluate which clinical variables may influence patient outcomes; we also focused on the possible prognostic role of adjuvant CT. A propensity score (PS) analysis using the inverse probability of treatment weighting was also carried out.

RESULTS

The 3- and 5-year survival rates were 54.1% and 45%, respectively. With the multivariable model, we found that increasing age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥2 and advanced TNM stage were indicators of poor prognosis. Weak evidence of a higher overall survival in patients receiving adjuvant CT (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.96, P  = 0.022) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A trend towards benefit from adjuvant CT has been observed in patients with LCNC. Although surgical procedures remain the mainstay of curative options, combination with other treatments (e.g. neoadjuvant CT/radiotherapy) should be evaluated by future studies.

Association of PD-L1 Expression with Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells and Mutation Burden in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

INTRODUCTION

The immune microenvironment of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung, including programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, has not been well characterized.

METHODS

On the basis of immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) was scored as follows: TC0 and IC0 were defined as PD-L1 expression less than 1%, TC1 and IC1 as at least 1% but less than 10%, TC2 and IC2 as 10% or more but less than 50%, and TC3 and IC3 as 50% or more. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) IHC was scored as either lost or retained expression. The Ion AmpliSeq Comprehensive Cancer Panel (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used to identify mutations in all coding exons of 409 cancer-related genes.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) (n = 72) and SCLC (n = 120) were studied. The prevalence of PD-L1 expression on TCs was 15.1% (29 of 192). IC infiltration and PD-L1 expression on ICs were observed in 34.4% of patients (66 of 192) and 31.3% of patients (60 of 192), respectively. The prevalence of IC infiltration and PD-L1 expression on IC were more strongly correlated with LCNEC than with SCLC (57.6% versus 23.3%, p < 0.01; 45.8% versus 22.5%, p < 0.01) and high nonsynonymous mutations (p = 0.05 and .04). PTEN loss was found in 9.5% of patients (18 of 189) and showed no correlation with PD-L1 expression. Progression-free survival was better in patients with IC infiltration than in those without IC infiltration (median 11.3 versus 6.8 months [p < 0.01]) and in patients with PD-L1 expression of IC1/2/3 than in those with expression of IC0 (median 11.3 versus 7.0 months [p = 0.03]).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is activated in the microenvironment of pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma and correlated with a higher mutation burden.

The Role of Systemic Therapy in the Management of Stage I Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment strategy for resected stage I large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) remains unknown. In this analysis, we evaluate the impact of systemic chemotherapy on patients with stage I LCNEC who have undergone surgical resection.

METHODS

The study population included patients who underwent surgical resection for LCNEC and had pathologic stage I disease. We compared overall survival between patients who underwent surgical resection alone and those who underwent surgical resection plus chemotherapy. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were analyzed by using multivariable Cox models and propensity score-matched analyses.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2013, 1232 patients underwent surgical resection for stage I LCNEC in the National Cancer Database, including 957 patients (77.7%) who underwent surgical resection alone and 275 (22.3%) who received both surgery and systemic chemotherapy. Five-year survival was significantly improved in patients who received chemotherapy (64.5% versus 48.4% [hazard ratio =0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p < 0.001]). Multivariable Cox modeling confirmed the survival benefit from chemotherapy for patients with resected stage I LCNEC (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p <0.0001). The survival benefit was further confirmed by propensity-matched analysis. In addition, older (age >70 years), comorbid white patients who underwent sublobar resections for tumors larger than 20 mm had worse survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this largest-reported retrospective study of patients with resected stage I LCNEC, survival was improved in patients who received chemotherapy in both stage IA and stage IB LCNEC.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with adenocarcinoma-like features: napsin A expression and genomic alterations

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a highly aggressive malignancy, which was recently found to comprise three major genomic subsets: small cell carcinoma-like, non-small cell carcinoma (predominantly adenocarcinoma)-like, and carcinoid-like. To further characterize adenocarcinoma-like subset, here we analyzed the expression of exocrine marker napsin A, along with TTF-1, in a large series of LCNECs (n=112), and performed detailed clinicopathologic and genomic analysis of napsin A-positive cases. For comparison, we analyzed napsin A expression in other lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (177 carcinoids, 37 small cell carcinomas) and 60 lung adenocarcinomas. We found that napsin A was expressed in 15% of LCNEC (17/112), whereas all carcinoids and small cell carcinomas were consistently negative. Napsin A reactivity in LCNEC was focal in 12/17 cases, and weak or moderate in intensity in all cases, which was significantly lower in the extent and intensity than seen in adenocarcinomas (P<0.0001). The combination of TTF-1-diffuse/napsin A-negative or focal was typical of LCNEC but was rare in adenocarcinoma, and could thus serve as a helpful diagnostic clue. The diagnosis of napsin A-positive LCNECs was confirmed by classic morphology, diffuse labeling for at least one neuroendocrine marker, most consistently synaptophysin, and the lack of distinct adenocarcinoma component. Genomic analysis of 14 napsin A-positive LCNECs revealed the presence of mutations typical of lung adenocarcinoma (KRAS and/or STK11) in 11 cases. In conclusion, LCNECs are unique among lung neuroendocrine neoplasms in that some of these tumors exhibit low-level expression of exocrine marker napsin A, and harbor genomic alterations typical of adenocarcinoma. Despite the apparent close biological relationship, designation of adeno-like LCNEC as a separate entity from adenocarcinoma is supported by their distinctive morphology, typically diffuse expression of neuroendocrine marker(s) and aggressive behavior. Further studies are warranted to assess the clinical utility and optimal method of identifying adenocarcinoma-like and other subsets of LCNEC in routine practice.

Two cases of the bronchial carcinoid tumors successfully treated with the parenchymal-sparing bronchoplastic resections

Carcinoid tumors account for 2% of primary lung tumors. We report two cases of the relatively young patients with typical and atypical carcinoid (AC) tumors that were managed successfully with a parenchymal-sparing bronchoplastic procedure.

Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Part II. Treatment

Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors that arise from Kulchitzky cells of the bronchial mucosa consist of a spectrum of histologic features leading to a variable prognosis. Although typical carcinoid represents the most benign course, small-cell cancer has the grimmest outcome. Therefore, differentiating the spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors helps one not only to determine the prognosis, but also to guide the treatment options. In this part, we aim to discuss the treatment options in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors except for small-cell lung cancer.

Identification of deregulation of apoptosis and cell cycle in neuroendocrine tumors of the lung via NanoString nCounter expression analysis

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung comprise typical (TC) and atypical carcinoids (AC), large-cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Cell cycle and apoptosis are key pathways of multicellular homeostasis and deregulation of these pathways is associated with cancerogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Sixty representative FFPE-specimens (16 TC, 13 AC, 16 LCNEC and 15 SCLC) were used for mRNA expression analysis using the NanoString technique. Eight genes related to apoptosis and ten genes regulating key points of cell cycle were investigated.

Results

ASCL1, BCL2, CASP8, CCNE1, CDK1, CDK2, CDKN1A and CDKN2A showed lower expression in carcinoids compared to carcinomas. In contrast, CCNE1 and CDK6 showed elevated expression in carcinoids compared to carcinomas. The calculated BCL2/BAX ratio showed increasing values from TC to SCLC.

Between SCLC and LCNEC CDK2, CDKN1B, CDKN2A and PNN expression was significantly different with higher expression in SCLC.

Conclusion

Carcinoids have increased CDK4/6 and CCND1 expression controlling RB1 phosphorylation via this signaling cascade. CDK2 and CCNE1 were increased in carcinomas showing that these use the opposite way to control RB1. BAX and BCL2 are antagonists in regulating apoptosis. BCL2 expression increased over BAX expression with increasing malignancy of the tumor from TC to SCLC.

Comprehensive Biomarkers for Personalized Treatment in Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis With Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is extremely poor, and optimal treatment strategies have not yet been established. To improve prognoses in patients with LCNEC, this study analyzed immunohistochemical expression and gene mutations of several known molecular targets in LCNECs and compared the expression levels of these targets with those in lung adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with primary LCNEC and 40 patients with adenocarcinoma were analyzed. Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), class III β-tubulin, topoisomerase I, topoisomerase II, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-L858R, and somatostatin receptor expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and EGFR mutations were evaluated using direct DNA sequencing and the Scorpion-amplified refractory mutation system.

RESULTS

In patients with LCNEC and adenocarcinoma, positive rates of topoisomerase I, topoisomerase II, ERCC1, class III β-tubulin, EGFR-L858R, and somatostatin were 100.0% and 100.0%, 65.4% and 15.0% (p < 0.0001), 42.3% and 17.5% (p = 0.0462), 46.2% and 62.5%, 0.0% and 20.0% (p = 0.0182), and 50.0% and 5.0% (p < 0.0001), respectively. The frequencies of EGFR mutations were 0.0% and 37.5% in LCNEC and adenocarcinoma (p = 0.0002), respectively. Five-year overall survival rates were 64% in LCNEC and 91% in adenocarcinoma in stage I (p = 0.0132). Multivariate analysis showed that LCNEC histologic type was an independent prognostic factor in stage I.

CONCLUSIONS

LCNEC showed overexpression of topoisomerase II, somatostatin, and ERCC1. These findings suggested that it was possible to have good response to treatment with etoposide and octreotide and that LCNEC may be resistant to platinum-based therapy compared with adenocarcinoma. EGFR mutations were not observed in LCNEC. These results may indicate a favorable response to adjuvant treatments that are not typically prescribed for non-small cell lung cancer.

Prognostic factors for long term survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85% of all lung cancers. It is estimated that 60% of patients with NSCLC at time of diagnosis have advanced disease. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical and demographic prognostic factors of long term survival in patients with unresectable NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 1,156 patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV who survived more than 60 days from the time of diagnosis and treated from August 1987 until March 2013 in the Oncology Department of Pulmonary Clinic of the General Hospital Papanikolaou. Initially univariate analysis using the log-rank test was conducted and then multivariate analysis using the proportional hazards model of Cox. Also Kaplan Meier curves were used to describe the distribution of survival times of patients. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis was 62 years. About 11.9% of patients were women and 88.1% were male. The majority of cases were adenocarcinomas (42.2%), followed squamous (33%) and finally the large cell (6%). Unlike men, most common histological type among women was adenocarcinoma rather than squamous (63% vs. 10.9%). In univariate analysis statistically significant factors in the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were: weight loss ≥5%, histological type, line 1 drugs, line 1 combination, line 1 cycles and radio lung. Specifically radio lung gives clear survival benefit in the PFS and OS in stage IIIB (P=0.002) and IV (P<0.001). On the other hand, the number of distant metastases in stage IV patients did not affect OS, neither PFS. In addition patients who received platinum and taxane had better PFS (P=0.001) and OS (P<0.001) than those who received platinum without taxane. Also the third drug administration proved futile, since survival (682.06±34.9) (P=0.023) and PFS (434.93±26.93) (P=0.012) of patients who received less than three drugs was significantly larger. Finally, large cell carcinoma recorded the shortest OS and PFS compared with adenocarcinoma (P=0.043 and P=0.016 respectively) and squamous cell carcinoma (P=0.021 and P=0.004 respectively). In multivariate analysis the same predictors were statistically significant except for line 1 drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the increased incidence of adenocarcinoma in women than in men and the aggressiveness of large cell carcinoma. It also underlines the vitality of factors such as weight loss, radio lung and doublet platinum-based. On the other hand, it excludes significant factors such as gender, age and smoking.

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: From Epidemiology to Therapy

Lung neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous subtype of pulmonary cancers representing approximately 20% of all lung cancers, including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). The frequency appears to be approximately 3% for LCNEC. Diagnosis of LCNEC requires attention to neuroendocrine features by light microscopy and confirmation by immunohistochemical staining for neuroendocrine markers. Both SCLC and pulmonary LCNEC are high-grade and poor-prognosis tumors, with higher incidence in males and smokers and peripheral localization. LCNEC is very rare, and the precise diagnosis on small specimens is very difficult, so we have still too few data to define a standard of treatment for pulmonary LCNECs. Data of literature, most based on retrospective analysis, indicated a poor 5-year overall survival, with a high incidence of recurrence after surgery, even in stage I disease. Primary surgery should be the first option in all operable patients because there is no validate therapeutic approach for LCNEC due to lack of clinical trials in this setting. Neoadjuvant platinum-based regimens remain only an option for potentially resectable tumors. In advanced stages, SCLC-like chemotherapy seems the best option of treatment, with a good response rate but a poor overall survival (from 8 to 16 months in different case series). New agents are under clinical investigation to improve LCNEC patients' outcome. We reviewed all data on treatment options feasible for pulmonary LCNEC, both for localized and extensive disease.

Next-Generation Sequencing of Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Reveals Small Cell Carcinoma-like and Non-Small Cell Carcinoma-like Subsets

PURPOSE

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm, whose biologic relationship to small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) versus non-SCLC (NSCLC) remains unclear, contributing to uncertainty regarding optimal clinical management. To clarify these relationships, we analyzed genomic alterations in LCNEC compared with other major lung carcinoma types.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

LCNEC (n = 45) tumor/normal pairs underwent targeted next-generation sequencing of 241 cancer genes by Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) platform and comprehensive histologic, immunohistochemical, and clinical analysis. Genomic data were compared with MSK-IMPACT analysis of other lung carcinoma histologies (n = 242).

RESULTS

Commonly altered genes in LCNEC included TP53 (78%), RB1 (38%), STK11 (33%), KEAP1 (31%), and KRAS (22%). Genomic profiles segregated LCNEC into 2 major and 1 minor subsets: SCLC-like (n = 18), characterized by TP53+RB1 co-mutation/loss and other SCLC-type alterations, including MYCL amplification; NSCLC-like (n = 25), characterized by the lack of coaltered TP53+RB1 and nearly universal occurrence of NSCLC-type mutations (STK11, KRAS, and KEAP1); and carcinoid-like (n = 2), characterized by MEN1 mutations and low mutation burden. SCLC-like and NSCLC-like subsets revealed several clinicopathologic differences, including higher proliferative activity in SCLC-like tumors (P < 0.0001) and exclusive adenocarcinoma-type differentiation marker expression in NSCLC-like tumors (P = 0.005). While exhibiting predominant similarity with lung adenocarcinoma, NSCLC-like LCNEC harbored several distinctive genomic alterations, including more frequent mutations in NOTCH family genes (28%), implicated as key regulators of neuroendocrine differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

LCNEC is a biologically heterogeneous group of tumors, comprising distinct subsets with genomic signatures of SCLC, NSCLC (predominantly adenocarcinoma), and rarely, highly proliferative carcinoids. Recognition of these subsets may inform the classification and management of LCNEC patients. Clin Cancer Res; 22(14); 3618-29. ©2016 AACR.

[Clinical Analysis of 22 Cases of Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer]

背景与目的

肺大细胞神经内分泌癌是肺原发恶性肿瘤的一种少见类型，由于其特殊的生物学行为、复杂的病理学标志、多样的影像学表现及欠佳的治疗疗效，亟待进行临床探讨。本研究旨在分析肺大细胞神经内分泌癌的临床资料，为进一步提高其诊治水平提供依据。

方法

回顾性分析22例肺大细胞神经内分泌癌患者的临床特征、诊治情况及预后。

结果

肺大细胞神经内分泌癌好发于有大量吸烟史的老年男性，临床表现以咳嗽、咳痰、咯血、胸痛为主。计算机断层扫描（computed tomography, CT）表现以周围型肿块为主，可伴不均匀强化和坏死。免疫组化神经内分泌分化标志物Syn、CgA和CD56的阳性表达率分别为72.7%、68.2%和68.2%。17例行手术治疗，术后10例接受辅助治疗，5例行姑息化疗。单因素分析提示吸烟指数（P=0.029）、淋巴结转移（P=0.034）、肿瘤-淋巴结-转移（tumor-node-metastasis, TNM）分期（P=0.005）、治疗方法（P=0.047）、术后辅助化疗（P=0.014）是预后的影响因素，多因素分析提示淋巴结转移（P=0.045）及术后辅助化疗（P=0.024）是预后的影响因素。

结论

肺大细胞神经内分泌癌缺乏特异性的临床表现，确诊依赖术后病理，各种治疗疗效欠佳。淋巴结转移状态及术后辅助化疗是影响预后的重要因素。

SOX4, SOX11 and PAX6 mRNA expression was identified as a (prognostic) marker for the aggressiveness of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung by using next-generation expression analysis (NanoString)

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung (NELC) account for 25% of all lung cancer cases and transcription factors may drive dedifferentiation of these tumors. This study was conducted to identify supportive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A total of 16 TC, 13 AC, 16 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and 15 small cell lung cancer were investigated for the mRNA expression of 11 transcription factors and related genes (MYB, MYBBP1A, OCT4, PAX6, PCDHB, RBP1, SDCBP, SOX2, SOX4, SOX11, TEAD2).

RESULTS

SOX4 (p = 0.0002), SOX11 (p < 0.0001) and PAX6 (p = 0.0002) were significant for tumor type. Elevated PAX6 and SOX11 expression correlated with poor outcome in large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and small cell lung cancer (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0232, respectively) based on survival data of 34 patients (57%).

CONCLUSION

Aggressiveness of NELC correlated with increasing expression of transcription factors. SOX11 seems to be a highly valuable diagnostic and prognostic marker for aggressive NELC.

Clinicopathological significance of cancer stem-like cell markers in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of cancer stem-like cell (CSLC) markers in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung, including small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients who underwent surgical resection of SCLC (n = 60) and LCNEC (n = 45) to analyze their clinicopathological profiles and the immunohistochemical expression of putative CSLC markers (Caveolin, Notch, CD44, CD166, SOX2, ALDH1, and Musashi1). Staining scores for these markers in tumor cells were calculated by multiplying the percentage of positive tumor cells per lesion by the staining intensity level (0, 1, and 2); a score of ≥ 10 represented positive expression.

RESULTS

There was a difference between SCLC and LCNEC with respect to both SOX2 (55 vs. 27 %, p = 0.003) and CD166 (27 vs. 47 %, p = 0.034) expression. ALDH1 expression was equally observed in SCLC and LCNEC (67 vs. 73 %, p = 0.46), and patients with ALDH1-positive HGNEC had significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates than those with ALDH1-negative HGNEC (5-year RFS: 39 vs. 67 %, p = 0.009; 5-year OS: 50 vs. 79 %, p = 0.021). A multivariate analysis revealed that positive ALDH1 expression was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor with respect to both RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in the expression profiles of CSLC markers might reflect morphological differences between SCLC and LCNEC. Positive ALDH1 expression in lung HGNEC was associated with an unfavorable patient prognosis, which suggested that ALDH1-positive tumor cells might be future therapeutic targets for the treatment of lung HGNEC.

What clinicians are asking pathologists when dealing with lung neuroendocrine neoplasms?

Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are currently classified in resection specimens according to four histological categories, namely typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell carcinoma (SCC). Diagnostic criteria have remained unchanged in the 2015 WHO classification, which has ratified the wide acceptance and popularity of such terminology in the pathologists׳ and clinicians׳ community. A unifying umbrella of NE morphology and differentiation has been recognized in lung NET, which has pushed to enter an unique box of invasive tumors along with diffuse idiopathic pulmonary NE cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) as a pre-invasive lesion with a potential toward the development of carcinoids. However, uncertainties remain in the terminology of lung NET upon small samples, where Ki-67 antigen could play some role to avoid misdiagnosing carcinoids as high-grade NE tumors. Epidemiologic, clinical and genetic traits support a biological three-tier over a pathology four-tier model, according to which TC are low malignancy tumors, AC intermediate malignancy tumors and LCNEC/SCC high malignancy tumors with no significant differences in survival among them. Inconsistencies in diagnostic reproducibility, troubles in the therapy of AC and LCNEC, and limitations to histology within the same tumor category argue in favor of a global re-thinking of lung NET where a grading system could play a role. This review outlines three main key questions in the field of lung NET: (A) unbiased diagnoses, (B) the role of Ki-67 and tumor grading, and (C) management of predictive markers. Answers are still inconclusive, thus additional research is required to improve our understanding on lung NET.

Outcome and prognostic factors of multimodal therapy for pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas

Background

There is controversy whether patients diagnosed with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) should be treated according to protocols for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancers (SCLC), especially with regard to the administration of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). This study was set up to determine the incidence of brain metastases and to investigate the outcome following multimodal treatment in 70 patients with LCNEC.

Methods

Seventy patients with histologically confirmed LCNEC were treated at the University Hospital of Heidelberg between 2001 and 2014. Data were collected retrospectively. Al most all patients received thoracic surgery as initial treatment (94 %). Chemotherapy was administered in 32 patients as part of the initial treatment. Fourteen patients were treated with adjuvant or definitive thoracic radiotherapy according to NSCLC protocols. Cranial radiotherapy due to brain metastases, mostly given as whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), was received by fourteen patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the long-rank test and the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Without PCI, the detected rate for brain metastases was 25 % after a median follow-up time of 23.4 months, which is comparable to NSCLC patients in general. Overall (OS), local (LPFS), brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and extracranial distant progression-free survival (eDPFS) was 43, 50, 63 and 50 % at 5 years, respectively. Patients with incomplete resection showed a survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy improved the general worse prognosis in higher pathologic stages.

Conclusion

In LCNEC patients, the administration of radiotherapy according to NSCLC guidelines appears reasonable and contributes to acceptable results of multimodal treatment regimes. The low incidence of spontaneous brain metastases questions a possible role of PCI.

Mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma of the lung: A case report

In the present study, a 79-year-old male was referred to Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital due to an abnormal shadow that was revealed on a chest X-ray. The patient possessed a five-year history of consolidation in the right lower lobe, which was diagnosed as chronic aspiration pneumonia and followed up. However, the abnormal shadow adjacent to the pleura gradually increased in size and a novel mass appeared in the right lower lobe that rapidly increased in size. A repeat biopsy revealed a combination of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with a clinical tumor-node-metastasis (cTNM) stage of cT2bN2M0 (stage 3A) and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma at Ann Arbor stage 1E. Chemoradiotherapy markedly affected the lesion and the size of the mass was significantly reduced subsequent to four cycles of chemotherapy, which was considered to be a near complete response. The present study reports an extremely rare combination of tumors. The disease course was followed over a period of six years, which included the onset of disease, and the present case may therefore be valuable in clarifying the mechanism of lung cancer development.

Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome associated with non-small cell lung cancer

A 68-year-old man developed progressive vertigo, saccadic eye movements, and tremors. Computed tomography showed multiple lung nodules. Surgery was performed and the pathological diagnosis was large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in the left upper lobe with ipsilobar metastases, and adenocarcinoma in the left lower lobe. The neurological symptoms resolved dramatically after complete resection of the tumors. Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome associated with non-small-cell lung carcinoma is extremely rare. Surgery should not be delayed if a complete resection is expected.

Primary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast Occurring in a Pre-Menopausal Woman

BACKGROUND

Primary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (LCNEC-breast) in pre-menopausal women is extremely rare.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old woman presented with a mass in the left breast that was diagnosed as neuroendocrine carcinoma by needle biopsy. Computed tomography revealed no lymph node swelling or distant organ metastasis. Left mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were performed and metastasis to the axial lymph node was detected. Left axillary lymph node dissection was performed and histopathological and immunohistochemical examination revealed that the tumor was an LCNEC-breast, which was 6.0 cm in size and positive for the neuroendocrine markers (neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin). The tumor cells were hormone-receptor positive and HER2 negative. The patient refused any adjuvant hormonal therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. She has been followed up for 4 years without medication, and no recurrence has been noted.

CONCLUSION

We present a case of LCNEC-breast in a 34-year-old woman. Our case represents the youngest woman with LCNEC-breast reported in the English literature.

Clinical analysis of 50 Eastern Asian patients with primary pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To understand the clinicopathological features of patients with primary pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), including the frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, and to explore prognostic factors.

METHODS

We investigated a cohort of 50 individuals from our center database who were diagnosed with operable pulmonary LCNEC and treated in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Serum albumin (ALB) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were also collected. Survival curves were obtained with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between groups in survival were tested by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median age was 59 years (range, 40-80 years). Fourteen patients underwent mutational analysis of EGFR; of these, 12 had wild-type EGFR and the remaining two had EGFR mutations in exons. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of pulmonary LCNEC was 49.3 months and that of overall survival (OS) was not reached. DFS and OS were shorter for patients with decreased serum ALB than for patients with normal serum ALB (P=0.003 and P=0.004, respectively). Meanwhile, a high level of NSE was also significantly associated with short DFS and OS (P=0.005 and P=0.000, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that decrease in serum ALB was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P=0.046).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of EGFR mutation in LCNEC patients is low. Serum ALB and NSE levels are valuable prognostic factors for LCNEC patients.

Multidisciplinary management of advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors

The optimal clinical management of aggressive/advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is still debated, due to their rarity and the lack of prospective randomized studies. Results derive from retrospective mono-Institutional series, and few dedicated prospective trials, recently designed, are still ongoing. In low-grade tumors [bronchial carcinoids (BCs)] surgery, whenever feasible, remains the mainstay of treatment, and chemo/radiotherapy (RT) should be reserved to progressive diseases (PD). In case of resected N1-N2 BCs, a "watch and see" policy associated with a close clinical/radiological follow-up is recommended. Somatostatin analogs (SSA) seem to be effective in controlling BCs associated endocrine syndromes, while SSA antiproliferative effect has also been reported in the past. Targeted therapy with new drugs (Everolimus) seems to be very promising, but further trials are needed. Surgery alone is not sufficient to treat high-grade NETs: adjuvant CT is required also in early stages. Platinum-Etoposide regimen demonstrated to be the most effective; irinotecan and other biological drugs are considered very promising. In conclusion, the management of advanced lung NETs should be individualized by multidisciplinary teams which include Medical and Radiation Oncologists, Surgeons, Pathologists, Pulmonologists, Endocrinologists, Interventional Radiologists, and the prognosis is mainly dependent on tumor grade and its anatomical extent.

Are we ready to use biomarkers for staging, prognosis and treatment selection in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer?

Lung cancer accounts for the majority of cancer-related deaths worldwide. At present, platinum-based therapy represents the standard of care in fit stage II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients following surgical resection. In advanced disease, personalized chemotherapy and targeted biologic therapy based on histological and molecular tumor profiling have already shown promise in terms of optimizing treatment efficacy. While disease stage is associated with outcome and is commonly used to determine adjuvant treatment eligibility, it is known that a subset of patients with early stage disease experience shorter survival than others with the same clinicopathological characteristics. Improved methods for identifying these individuals, at or near the time of initial diagnosis, may inform the decision to pursue adjuvant therapy options. Among the numerous candidate molecular biomarkers, only few gene-expression profiling signatures provide clinically relevant information, while real-time quantitative polymerase-chain reaction (RT-qPCR) strategy involving relatively small numbers of genes offers a practical alternative with high cross-platform performance. mRNA and/or protein expression levels of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), ribonucleotide reductase M subunit 1 (RRM1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) are among the most promising potential biomarkers for early disease and their clinical utility is currently being evaluated in randomized phase II and III clinical trials. This review describes the most promising clinicopathological and molecular biomarkers with predictive and prognostic significance in lung cancer that have been identified through advanced research and which could influence adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy decisions for operable NSCLC in routine clinical practice.

Clinical presentation and evaluation of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung encompass a wide spectrum. A carcinoid tumor is either a central smooth endobronchial tumor or a round, well-circumscribed, peripheral parenchymal lesion. Distinguishing typical carcinoid tumors from atypical carcinoid tumors is unreliable from a limited biopsy but can be based on age, presentation, and node enlargement. Large cell neuroendocrine cancer presents similarly to most non-small cell lung cancers. Small cell lung cancer has a characteristic presentation, with a rapid progression of symptoms, and a bulky central and/or mediastinal tumor. A diagnosis is achieved by limited biopsy and is usually reliable.