Equivalent performance of epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in children: a single institution and manufacturer experience

Device-related complications in a national pediatric cardiac implantable electronic device cohort stratified after age and implantation technique

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can be implanted epicardially or transvenously in children. Both techniques involve procedure-specific complications, and evidence for the choice of technique in children of different ages is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize a complete national pediatric cohort with de novo CIED implantation and compare the risks and causes of reintervention between transvenous and epicardial CIED recipients.

METHODS

This retrospective nationwide cohort study included all Danish children aged ≤15 years receiving a CIED from 1977 to 2021. Outcomes included time to first reintervention stratified by age and implantation technique. Reintervention was due to either battery depletion or lead or generator complication.

RESULTS

A total of 376 children received an epicardial (n = 131 [35%]) or transvenous (n = 245 [65%]) CIED with median [interquartile range] follow-up of 14 [6-21] years. Median age was 6 [1-11] years. For epicardial recipients, complication-driven reintervention was equal across age groups (P = .10), whereas among transvenous recipients the risk was significantly lower with increasing age (P <.001). Age-specific risk analyses revealed different risks for children aged <1 year, 1-8 years, and 9-15 years (Pinteraction <.001). For children <1 year, a complication-driven reintervention was more frequent for transvenous vs epicardial recipients (P <.001), whereas in children aged 9-15 years, the opposite was observed (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Transvenous implantation in children <1 year and epicardial implantation in children 9-15 years was associated with higher risk of CIED-related complication leading to reintervention, whereas for children aged 1-8 years, the complication risk was similar between implantation techniques.

Lead Longevity in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Patients: The Impact of Patient Somatic Growth

BACKGROUND

Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) patients may be required for decades. In this population, there are sparse data on long-term lead functionality.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess pacemaker and defibrillator lead survival in pediatric and CHD patients beyond 10 years after implantation and to identify patient- and lead-related factors associated with earlier lead failure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study reviewing all patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator who received care at a single large children's hospital during a 30-year timespan. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify risk factors associated with earlier lead failure.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 952 leads in 396 patients. Overall lead survival was 87% at 10 years, 78% at 15 years, and 69% at 20 years. Male sex, younger patient age, greater somatic growth, left ventricular lead location, and epicardial implantation approach were associated with higher likelihood of lead failure (log-rank test P <0.05). On multivariate analysis, the most significant predictor of lead failure was patient somatic growth ≥5 cm/year (HR 3.33; 95% CI: 1.78-6.25). The presence of CHD, lead insulation, and lead manufacturer had no impact on lead longevity.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater patient somatic growth is an important predictor of lead failure. Greater somatic growth may account for the observation in this study (and prior studies) that leads in male patients, younger patients, and implanted via epicardial approach were more likely to fail.

Transvenous endocardial pacing with SelectSecure™ 3830 lead in pediatric patients: case series of two infants and a literature review

BACKGROUND

The SelectSecure™ 3830 lead is an innovative, lumenless, and thin active fixed lead with a nonretractable screw-in tip and a diameter of 4.1 Fr, making it the thinnest pacing lead available. Its high anti-extrusion properties and durability have shown favorable outcomes in cardiac pacing, especially in pediatric patients. The superfine design and easy implantation of the lead have rendered it a preferred choice in children, particularly in cases of congenital heart disease.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case series presents two infant patients who underwent transvenous endocardial pacing using the SelectSecure™ 3830 lead, along with a comprehensive literature review on the topic. The study followed the patients for 5 years and 3 years, respectively, and observed stable pacing parameters, indicating a positive therapeutic outcome and safety. This article discusses the optimal age and body shape for transvenous lead implantation in infants and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of endocardial and epicardial pacing approaches. Although endocardial pacing offers several benefits such as minimal trauma, short hospital stay, and longer battery life, it may not be suitable for intracardiac shunts, and venous occlusion remains a concern. On the other hand, epicardial pacing may be considered for children with challenging endocardial access but comes with higher risk of lead failure and coronary artery compression. This study emphasizes the importance of careful follow-up in pediatric patients with pacing, as lead failure can occur in young patients owing to growth and development, leading to syncope and battery depletion. The article also underscores the significance of selecting the appropriate pacing location to minimize the impact of cardiac function, with right ventricular septal pacing emerging as a preferable option.

CONCLUSIONS

The SelectSecure™ 3830 lead presents a promising solution for transvenous endocardial pacing in pediatric patients with high degree atrioventricular block and bradycardia, ensuring safe and effective pacing as they grow and develop.

Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pacing indications in children are clearly defined, but whether an epicardial (EPI) or an endocardial (ENDO) pacemaker performs better remains to be elucidated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to directly compare the incidence of pacemaker (PM) lead-related complications, mortality, hemothorax and venous occlusion between EPI and ENDO in children with atrioventricular block (AVB) or sinus node dysfunction (SND). Literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus by ELSEVIER, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases until June 25, 2022. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the pacing method's effect on lead failure, threshold rise, post-implantation infection and battery depletion and secondarily on all-cause mortality, hemothorax and venous occlusion. Several sensitivity analyses were also performed. Of 22 studies initially retrieved, 18 were deemed eligible for systematic review and 15 for meta-analysis. Of 1348 pediatric patients that underwent EPI or ENDO implantation, 542 (40.2%) had a diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). EPI was significantly associated with higher possibility of PM-lead failure [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05-4.39; I2 = 0%]; while possibility for threshold rise, post-implantation infection and battery depletion did not differ between the PM types. Regarding the secondary outcome, the mortality rates between EPI and ENDO did not differ. In sensitivity analyses the results were consistent results between the two PM types. The findings suggest that EPI may be associated with increased PM-lead failure compared to ENDO while threshold rise, infection, battery depletion and mortality rates did not differ.

Experience of treating congenital complete atrioventricular block with epicardial pacemaker in infants and young children: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This article summarizes the treatment experience for congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) in newborns and infants, and discusses the necessity and feasibility of treating CCAVB with permanent pacemaker implantation in this population.

METHODS

In this study, the clinical data and follow-up results of nine children admitted at our center with CCAVB from January 2005 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, two children received early implantation of permanent pacemakers (within 1 year of age), two children received non-early implantation (1 year or older), and the remaining five children received no pacemaker implantation. CCAVB diagnosis was confirmed by clinical symptoms and clinical examinations, including electrocardiography and echocardiography before surgery. After surgery, the pacing and sensing functions of the pacemaker were observed using electrocardiography, echocardiography, and pacing threshold monitoring. A comprehensive assessment of the treatment efficacy was conducted, encompassing improvements in clinical symptoms, growth and development, as well as the absence of any additional potential complications. The children who did not receive pacemaker implantation were followed up.

RESULTS

Among the four children who successfully received pacemaker implantation, one child who received non-early implantation died. For the remaining three children, the threshold level, amplitude, impedance, and minute ventilation sensor function of the pacemaker were good during the follow-up period, with a heart rate at the pacing rate. The growth and development of the aforementioned patients who received pacemaker implantation demonstrated adherence to the percentile curve, and their motor and cognitive development remained unaffected. However, among the children who did not undergo pacemaker implantation, two experienced death, while three were lost to follow-up, thereby limiting the evaluation of their long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Early implantation of an epicardial pacemaker at an early stage in newborns and infants diagnosed with CCAVB can significantly improve clinical symptoms without affecting their growth and development. These data are in line with current literature and suggest that early implantation of an epicardial pacemaker in newborns and infants diagnosed with CCAVB but further studies are needed.

Outcomes in Congenital and Childhood Complete Atrioventricular Block: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcomes of patients with congenital and childhood complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB/ CAVB) after pacemaker implantation are unclear.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of all the studies of CCAVB. A systematic search of PubMed and CENTRAL databases from 1^st January 1967 to 31^st January 2020 was performed. The quality of studies included was critically appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and outcome data were analyzed using the restricted maximum likelihood function.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were eligible for analysis, with a total of 1553 patients. The all-cause-mortality was 5.7 % [95% CI: 2.5-9.9%], while PICM was seen in 3.8% [95% CI: 1.2-7.2]. Diagnosis at birth [effect size (ES)(95%CI): -2.23 (-0.36 to -0.10); p<0.001], presence of congenital heart disease ([ES(95%CI): -0.67 (0.41 to 0.93); p<0.001], younger age at pacemaker implantation ([ES(95%CI): -0.01 (-0.02 to -0.001); p=0.02], and duration of pacing [ES(95%CI): -0.03 (-0.05 to -0.003); p=0.03], were associated with an higher mortality on binominal logistic regression. None of the parameters were significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Pooled proportional mortality in patients with CCAVB and CAVB is 5.7% with an infrequent incidence of PICM (3.8%) in the paced patients with AVB suggesting that pacing in these patients is an effective management strategy with a low incidence of long-term side effects. Registry and randomized data can throw additional light regarding the natural history and appropriate management strategy in these patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

"Retained wire femoral lead removal and fibroplasty" for obtaining venous access in patients with refractory venous obstruction

BACKGROUND

Patients with wire and catheter refractory venous occlusion are traditionally referred for pectoral transvenous lead extraction (TLE) to obtain venous access. TLE causes 1-2 mm circumferential mechanical or laser destruction of tissue surrounding the lead(s). This not only exposes the patient to the risk of major complications but also can damage nontargeted leads. We present a series of patients where retained wire femoral lead removal and fibroplasty was used to obtain venous access in patients with refractory obstruction.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2021, we identified 17 patients where retained wire lead removal followed by fibroplasty was used to retain venous access. Demographic and procedural data were obtained by retrospective review of patient charts.

RESULTS

We were able to successfully obtain venous access in all 17 patients in whom this technique was attempted. In two patients the target lead was less than or equal to 1 year old. In the remaining 15 patients, the average dwell time of the target lead(s) was 6 years. There were no procedure-related complications, and no changes in the parameters of other leads were noted.

CONCLUSION

Retained wire femoral lead removal and fibroplasty is safe and highly efficacious at obtaining venous access in patients with refractory venous occlusion. If the target lead(s) is less than or equal to 1 year old, this technique can help obtain venous access at the time of the initial surgery, hence avoiding the need for TLE. Furthermore, in patients referred for TLE to obtain venous access, this technique by avoiding the use of TLE tools spares the patient of the associated risks.

The use of laser lead extraction sheath in the presence of supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins for cardiac implantable electronic device lead upgrade or revision

Background

The implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has increased in the last decades with improvement in the quality of life of patients with cardiac rhythm disorders. The presence of bilateral subclavian, innominate or superior vena cava obstruction is a major limitation to device revision and/or upgrade.

Methods and material

This is retrospective study of patients who underwent laser-assisted lead extraction (LLE) (GlideLight laser sheath, Spectranetics Corporation, Colorado Springs, USA) with lead revision or upgrade using the laser sheath as a guide rail. Patients with known occlusion, severe stenosis or functional obstruction of the venous access vessels with indwelling leads were included in this study.

Results

106 patients underwent percutaneous LLE with lead revision and/or upgrade. Preoperative known complete occlusion or severe stenosis of access veins was present in 23 patients (21.5%). More patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) underwent LLE (64.1%) than patients with CRT-Ds (24.5%) and pacemaker patients (11.3%). In total 172 leads were extracted: 79 (45.9%) single-coil defibrillator leads, 35 (20.3%) dual-coil defibrillator leads, 31 (18.0%) right atrial leads, 24 (13.9%) right ventricular leads and three (1.7%) malfunctional coronary sinus left ventricular pacing leads. The mean age of leads was 99.2±65.6 months. The implantation of new leads after crossing the venous stenosis/obstruction was successful in 98 (92.4%) cases. Postoperative complications were pocket hematoma in two cases and wound infection in one case. No peri-operative and no immediate postoperative death was recorded. One intraoperative superior vena cava tear was treated by immediate thoracotomy and surgical repair.

Conclusion

In a single-center study on LLE in the presence of supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins for CIED lead upgrade and revision we could demonstrate a low procedural complication rate with no procedural deaths. Most of the leads could be completely extracted to revise or upgrade the system. Our study showed a low complication rate, with acceptable mortality rates.

Evaluation of different lead types and implantation techniques in pediatric populations with permanent pacemakers: Single-center with 10 years' experience

BACKGROUND

Permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation is performed for various indications and by different techniques in children; however, many problems with lead performance are encountered during follow-up. This study aims to evaluate the possible effects of different lead types and implantation techniques on pacing at early and midterm in children with a permanent PM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pediatric patients who underwent permanent PM system implantation at our tertiary cardiac surgery center between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were categorized in the epicardial pacing lead (EP), transvenous pacing lead (TP), and transvenous bipolar lumenless (Select Secure [SS]) lead groups according to the lead implantation technique and lead type with the same manufacturer. Groups were evaluated statistically for demographic features, pacing type and indication for implantation, lead electrical performance, lead failure, complications, and outcome.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, 323 lead implantations were performed on 167 patients (96 males, median age 68 months [5 days-18 years]). Of 323 leads, 213 (66%) were EP, 64 (20%) were TP, and 46 (14%) were SS. Of the total, 136 of the leads were implanted in atria, and 187 were implanted in ventricles. Primary pacing indications were postoperative complete atrioventricular (AV) block (n = 95), congenital AV block (n = 71), sinus node dysfunction (n = 13), and acquired complete AV block (n = 1). Additional cardiac diseases were present in 115 patients (69%). No statistically significant difference was observed in gender, syndrome, or pacing indication (P > .05). Atrial and ventricular capture, threshold, sensing, and lead impedance measurements were not significantly different at the initial and follow-up periods (P > .05). The median follow-up duration was 3.3 years (6 months-10 years). Twenty lead failures were determined in 15 patients (EP: 14 lead failures in 10 patients; TP: two lead failures in two patients; and SS: four lead failures in three patients) during follow-up, and no statistically significant difference was found between groups (P = .466). The 5-year lead survival was 98% for TP, 95% for EP, and 90% for SS; the 10-year lead survival was 90% for TP, 70% for EP, and 70% for SS. There was no mortality related to chronic pacing or due to the procedure of implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvements in technology, lead failure is still one of the most critical problems during these patients' follow-up. Early to midterm lead survival rates of all three lead types were satisfactory.

Pacing therapy in children with isolated complete atrioventricular block: a retrospective study of pacing system survival and pacing-related complications in a national cohort

AIMS

To evaluate pacing system survival and complications to pacemaker (PM) therapy in children with isolated complete atrioventricular block (CAVB).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a nationwide retrospective study of children diagnosed before 15 years of age with isolated CAVB and PM treatment. Between 1983 and 2012, 127 patients underwent PM-implantations at 3.2 (0-17) [median (range)] years and were followed for 11 (0.6-19) years. An endocardial or epicardial PM system was implanted in 72 and 55 patients, respectively. A total of 306 pacing leads (76% steroid-eluting) were implanted. Pacing system survival was significantly affected by age, with a higher risk of a new intervention for children aged <1 month at first implantation. Lead survival of the steroid-eluting leads at 5 and 10 years was 90 and 81%, respectively, with no difference between epicardial and endocardial systems. Complications leading to revision of the pacing system occurred in 24% of the patients. Patients aged <1 month at first PM implantation had a five-fold increased risk for a complication to occur. Dividing the cohort according to year of first procedure showed that those who had their first implantation ≥2002 had fewer complications and also lead- and pacing system survival was better in the later cohort.

CONCLUSION

Pacing system survival and complications to PM therapy in young patients with isolated CAVB were significantly affected by age, with low age at PM implantation constituting a risk factor. Endocardial and epicardial pacing systems showed no significant differences in performance.

Minimally Invasive Implantation of a Micropacemaker Into the Pericardial Space

BACKGROUND

Permanent cardiac pacemakers require invasive procedures with complications often related to long pacemaker leads. We are developing a percutaneous pacemaker for implantation of an entire pacing system into the pericardial space.

METHODS

Percutaneous micropacemaker implantations were performed in 6 pigs (27.4-34.1 kg) using subxyphoid access to the pericardial space. Modifications in the implantation methods and hardware were made after each experiment as the insertion method was optimized. In the first 5 animals, nonfunctional pacemaker devices were studied. In the final animal, a functional pacemaker was implanted.

RESULTS

Successful placement of the entire nonfunctional pacing system into the pericardial space was demonstrated in 2 of the first 5 animals, and successful implantation and capture was achieved using a functional system in the last animal. A sheath was developed that allows retractable features to secure positioning within the pericardial space. In addition, a miniaturized camera with fiberoptic illumination allowed visualization of the implantation site before electrode insertion into myocardium. All animals studied during follow-up survived without symptoms after the initial postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel micropacemaker system allows cardiac pacing without entering the vascular space or surgical exposure of the heart. This pericardial pacemaker system may be an option for a large number of patients currently requiring transvenous pacemakers but is particularly relevant for patients with restricted vascular access, young children, or those with congenital heart disease who require epicardial access.

Transvenous Versus Epicardial Pacing in Fontan Patients

Up to 10% of Fontan patients require pacemakers; an epicardial approach has historically been used. A transvenous approach can be used but carries risk of Fontan obstruction, thromboembolism, and can be technically challenging. The safety and efficacy of these approaches is not well described. The aim of this study was to compare epicardial and transvenous pacemaker outcomes in Fontan patients, specifically, device performance and adverse event rate. A retrospective review was performed on Fontan pacemaker patients followed at a single institution. Thirty-one Fontan pacemaker patients were identified between 1985 and 2017. Twenty-six had an epicardial system, five transvenous, and three converted from epicardial to transvenous. Average atrial lead sensing at placement was 3.23 versus 2.35 mV (p = 0.52) for epicardial and transvenous leads, respectively. Median atrial and ventricular lead longevity was 86.4 versus 98.8 months (p = 0.56) and 73.2 versus 140 months (p = 0.3) with generator longevity of 65.5 versus 73.9 (p = 0.16) months for epicardial versus transvenous systems, respectively. One major complication occurred in a transvenous patient, and two minor complications occurred in epicardial patients. All transvenous patients received warfarin except one, who converted to dabigatran. Epicardial patients received aspirin (n = 20), warfarin (n = 3) or a warfarin/aspirin combination (n = 3). No thromboembolic events occurred. System revision was required in 13 epicardial and 5 transvenous patients. There were two deaths, none related to the pacemaker system. Transvenous pacemakers can be utilized with equal efficacy compared to epicardial pacemakers with trends toward longer lead longevity in transvenous pacemaker systems.

Cardiac implantable electronic device and vascular access: Strategies to overcome problems

For arrhythmia treatment or sudden cardiac death prevention in hemodialysis patients, there is a frequent need for placement of a cardiac implantable electronic device (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization device). Leads from a cardiac implantable electronic device can cause central vein stenosis and carry the risk of tricuspid regurgitation or contribute to infective endocarditis. In patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring vascular access and cardiac implantable electronic device, the best strategy is to create an arteriovenous fistula on the contralateral upper limb for a cardiac implantable electronic device and avoidance of central vein catheter. Fortunately, cardiac electrotherapy is moving toward miniaturization and less transvenous wires. Whenever feasible, one should avoid transvenous leads and choose alternative options such as subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator, epicardial leads, and leadless pacemaker. Based on recent reports on the leadless pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator effectiveness, in patients with rapid progression of chronic kidney disease (high risk of renal failure) or glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m², this option should be considered by the implanting cardiologist for future access protection.

Long-term outcome of transvenous pacemaker implantation in infants: a retrospective cohort study

AIM

Evaluation of long-term outcome of transvenous pacemaker (PM) implantation in infants.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of all transvenous PM implantations in infants <10 kg between September 1997 and October 2001 was made. Indications for PM implantation, age at implantation, and determinants of long-term outcome including cardiac function, PM function, and PM (system) complications were noted. Seven patients underwent transvenous VVI(R) PM implantation. Median age at implantation was 3 days (range: 1 day to 14 months), median weight 3.5 kg (range: 2.3-8.7 kg), and median follow-up 14 years (range: 12.3-16.3 years). Pacemaker indications were congenital complete atrioventricular block (n = 4), long QT syndrome with heart block (n = 2), and post-operative complete atrioventricular block with sinus node dysfunction (n = 1). No procedural complications were noted. Today all patients are alive and symptom free with good PM and cardiac function. Two patients underwent PM generator relocation for imminent skin necrosis and skin traction. Two patients suffered from asymptomatic left subclavian vein occlusion and developed thrombosis on the PM electrode. Three patients were converted to an epicardial PM system, due to atrial perforation after upgrading procedure (n = 1), syncope with need for implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation (n = 1), and systolic dysfunction with development of dilated cardiomyopathy, which normalized under cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing (n = 1). Two patients needed atrioventricular (AV) valve repair for severe insufficiency. Two patients underwent repositioning of dysfunctional PM leads. In five patients, transvenous leads were removed. Indications were elective lead replacement (n = 1), atrial perforation (n = 1), and switch to an epicardial system (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Transvenous PM implantation in infants (<10 kg) is associated with a high incidence of vascular occlusion, thrombosis, and severe atrioventricular valve regurgitation during long-term follow-up. We advocate an epicardial approach for PM implantation in small children.

Acute and Chronic Performance Evaluation of a Novel Epicardial Pacing Lead Placed by Percutaneous Subxiphoid Approach in a Canine Model

Background—

Endovascularly implanted leads risk vascular injury and endocarditis, and can be difficult to locate in desired positions for LV pacing. We evaluated the acute and long-term stability, electric performance and histopathology of a percutaneously placed intrapericardial lead (IPL).

Methods and Results—

Twelve adult mongrel dogs underwent defibrillator implants incorporating IPLs. Successful uncomplicated percutaneous implantation of an IPL was achieved in all. Early fluoroscopic shift noted with 3 of 6 of the initial version IPL-1 was not seen with the modified IPL-2. Mean±95% confidence interval bipolar capture threshold at 0.5-ms pulse width for the IPL increased from 0.69±0.14 V at implant to 1.50±0.34 V ( P =0.003) at 12 weeks. The 12-week thresholds were higher for IPL compared with right ventricular endocardial leads (0.75±0.33 V; P =0.001) but not different compared with coronary sinus leads (1.33±0.58 V; P =0.994). IPL impedance increased from 742±46 Ω at implant to 1066±207 Ω at 12 weeks ( P =0.007). R-wave amplitude at 12 weeks was 8.37±1.52 mV. There was no important phrenic nerve stimulation from IPL pacing. Histopathology in 8 animals showed adequate adhesion of the electrodes or mesh to the epicardium without damage to underlying vasculature. There was no evidence for late pericardial inflammation or effusion.

Conclusions—

The IPL demonstrated adequate stability of position and acceptable electric parameters without chronic pericardial inflammation in this canine model and offers a potential alternative to endocardial pacing leads.

Performance of steroid eluting bipolar epicardial leads in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients: 15 years of single center experience

Objective

Cardiac pacing is sometimes required for patients with congenital heart disease for various reasons. Because of complex anatomy, repetitive previous heart surgery and patient size, epicardial leads are of special importance in these patients. Using epicardial leads has been discussed controversly regarding pacing performance and lead survival. The aim of this study was to review the long-term data on pacing performance as well as lead survival of epicardial leads implanted in our center.

Methods

Retrospective chart review and review of the literature.

Results

82 consecutive pediatric patients or adult patients with congenital heart disease with 158 epicardial leads (Medtronic 4968, bipolar, steroid - eluting) were included. We found 1.2% pacemaker-related early postoperative complications. The incidence of lead dysfunction was 7.5% (12/158) for primary (i.e. directly related to the lead itself) lead dysfunction and 3.2% (5/158) of lead abandonment for reasons not directly related to the lead itself. Primary lead dysfunction occured after a median of 3.83 years. Lead survival at 2, 5 and 10 years was 98.7%, 93% and 92.4%. There were no infections reported. Stable median measurements for impedance (RA/RV/LV of 577/483/610 Ohm), sensing threshold (RA/RV/LV of 2.0/11.0/10.0 mV) and pacing threshold (RA/RV/LV of 0.75 V at 0.4 ms/1.0 V at 0.49 ms/1.0 V at 0.45 ms) indicated a good mid- to longterm performance. The only risk factor for primary lead dysfunction was young age at implantation.

Conclusion

The use of epicardial leads in pediatric and adult patients with congenital heart disease shows good longterm outcomes in terms of pacing performance and lead survival. The authors encourage using epicardial leads in patients with congenital heart disease based on the patient‘s individual characteristics.

Laser lead extraction to facilitate cardiac implantable electronic device upgrade and revision in the presence of central venous obstruction

Aims

The number of procedures involving upgrade or revision of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing and the risks of adding additional leads are significant. Central venous occlusion in patients with pre-existing devices is often asymptomatic and optimal management of such patients in need of device revision/upgrade is not clear. We sought to assess our use of laser lead extraction in overcoming venous obstruction.

Methods and results

Patients in need of device upgrade/revision underwent pre-procedure venography to assess venous patency. In patients with venous occlusion or stenosis severe enough to preclude passage of a hydrophilic guide wire, laser lead extraction with retention of the outer sheath in the vasculature was performed with the aim of maintaining a patent channel through which new leads could be implanted. Data were recorded on a dedicated database and patient outcomes were assessed. Between July 2004 and April 2012, laser lead extractions were performed in 71 patients scheduled for device upgrade/revision who had occluded or functionally obstructed venous anatomy. New leads were successfully implanted across the obstruction in 67 (94%) cases. There were two major complications (infection) and four minor complications with no peri-procedural mortality. Device follow-up was satisfactory in 65 (92%) cases with mean follow-up up to 26 ± 19 months.

Conclusion

Laser lead extraction is a safe and effective option when managing patients with central venous obstruction in need of CIED revision or upgrade.

Permanent cardiac pacing in pediatric patients

Pediatric pacemaker (PM) implants comprise less than 1 % of all PM implants. This study aimed to investigate permanent cardiac pacing among the pediatric population, identifying different indications and complications of pediatric cardiac pacing, especially focusing on the effect of the pacing sites, the PM lead type, and the indications for pacing. The current work is a cross-sectional study of 103 procedures for permanent PM insertion in pediatric patients between January 2001 and December 2010. The patients were followed up 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation, then every 6 months or as needed. Evaluation included routine clinical examination, electrocardiography, chest X-ray, echocardiography, and a full analysis of the pacing system measurements. The ages of the patients ranged from 0.09 to 12 years (median, 2.3 years). The most common indication for pacing was postoperative complete heart bock, noted in 54 patients (52.4 %). Transvenous endocardial PM insertion was performed in 92 procedures (89.3 %), whereas transthoracic epicardial insertion was performed in 11 procedures (10.7 %). The most common site of pacing was the right ventricular apex (n = 64, 62 %), followed by the right ventricular outflow tract (n = 25, 24.3 %). Transthoracic epicardial PM insertion was associated with a significantly higher percentage and greater severity of complications. In this study, 65 % of the patients with left ventricle (LV) dilation before pacing showed a significant improvement in LV dimensions and function after pacing. This was noted only in those with endocardially inserted PM leads in both the congenital and the postoperative groups regardless of the pacing site. Endocardial PM insertion in children is a safe procedure with fewer complications and a lower ventricular threshold than the epicardial route. Permanent single-chamber right ventricle pacing is safe and can lead to significant improvement in LV function and dimensions. However, long-term follow-up assessment is needed for further evaluation.

Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review

The number of pediatric pacemakers implanted is still relatively small. Children requiring pacing therapy have characteristics that are distinct from those of adults, including physical size, somatic growth, and cardiac anomalies. Considering these features, long-term follow-up of pediatric pacemaker implantation is necessary. Selection of appropriate generators, pacing modes, pacing sites, and leads is important. Generally, epicardial leads are commonly used in small infants. On the other hand, the use of endocardial leads in children is increasing worldwide because of their benefits over epicardial leads, such as minimal invasiveness, lower pacing threshold, and longer generator longevity. Endocardial leads are not suitable for patients with intracardiac shunts because of the high risk of systemic thrombosis. Venous occlusion is another significant problem with endocardial leads. With the increase in the number of pacing device implantations, the incidence of infection from such devices is also increasing. Complete device removal is sometimes recommended to treat device infection, but experience in the removal of endocardial leads in children is still scarce. This article gives an overview of pacing therapy in the pediatric population, including discussions on new pacing systems, such as remote monitoring systems, magnetic imaging compliant pacemaker systems, and leadless pacing devices.

Event-free survival following CRT with surgically implanted LV leads versus standard transvenous approach

BACKGROUND

While surgical epicardial lead placement is performed in a subset of cardiac resynchronization therapy patients, data comparing survival following surgical versus transvenous lead placement are limited. We hypothesized that surgical procedures would be associated with increased mortality risk.

METHODS

Long-term event-free survival was assessed for 480 consecutive patients undergoing surgical (48) or percutaneous (432) left ventricle (LV) lead placement at our institution from January 2000 to September 2008.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between groups. While there was no statistically significant difference in overall event-free survival (P = 0.13), when analysis was restricted to surgical patients with isolated surgical lead placement (n = 28), event-free survival was significantly lower in surgical patients (P = 0.015). There appeared to be an early risk (first approximately 3 months postimplantation) with surgical lead placement, primarily in LV lead-only patients. Event rates were significantly higher in LV lead-only surgical patients than in transvenous patients in the first 3 months (P = 0.006). In proportional hazards analysis comparing isolated surgical LV lead placement to transvenous lead placement, adjusted hazard ratios were 1.8 ([1.1,2.7] P = 0.02) and 1.3 ([1.0,1.7] P = 0.07) for the first 3 months and for the full duration of follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated surgical LV lead placement appears to carry a small but significant upfront mortality cost, with risk extending beyond the immediate postoperative period. Long-term survival is similar, suggesting those surviving beyond this period of early risk derive the same benefit as coronary sinus lead recipients. Further work is needed to identify risk factors associated with early mortality following surgical lead placement.

A single institution experience with pacemaker implantation in a pediatric population over 25 years

BACKGROUND

With the development of new technical devices and software more appropriate for pediatric patients, pacemaker implantations in children and young adults have increased over time. It is necessary to monitor the mid- and long-term consequences. The decision for the implantation of a cardiovertor defibrillator (ICD) in children remains challenging despite technical improvements.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of pacemaker implantation in children, to review old and new indications, and to point out changes of management over time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1984 and 2009, 181 patients required the implantation of a pacemaker or an ICD device at the Heart and Diabetes Centre in Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. Their charts have been reviewed pro- and retrospectively for indications, complications, longevity of the device, and the natural course.

RESULTS

Indications have been high-degree atrioventricular block in 65% (postoperative 55%) and sinus node dysfunction in 24% (postoperative 90%), including three patients with vasovagally mediated significant bradycardia. Eleven percent required the implantation of an ICD device secondary to significant ventricular arrhythmias. The indication was class II in one-third of all patients. Complications requiring revision occurred in six patients (3.3%); one of them required removal of the device due to an infection. Ten patients died, but none related to pacemaker implantation.

CONCLUSION

Pacemaker implantation even in young pediatric patients is generally safe. No complication led to the death of a patient. The number of class II indications has been increasing. The future aim is to improve pediatric algorithms and to prevent unnecessary pacing.

Permanent atrial pacing lead implant route after Fontan operation

BACKGROUND

Atrial pacing is indicated for sinus node dysfunction (SND) after Fontan surgery; preferred lead implantation technique is debated. We compare outcomes of transvenous (TV) and epicardial (Epi) atrial lead implants in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective review of Fontan patients undergoing atrial lead implant between 1992 and 2007. Demographics, lead performance data, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

78 patients had 90 leads implanted: 25 via TV route and 65 via Epi route. Median follow-up was 1.6 years (TV) and 3.6 years (Epi). TV leads were implanted in older patients (23.1 vs 9.3 years, P < 0.001) and at longer intervals after Fontan (15.2 vs 4.9 years, P < 0.001). Pacing indication for most TV leads was SND, while Epi leads were also indicated for atrioventricular block. Acute complication rates were similar (8% TV vs 19% Epi, P = 0.23), but median hospital stay was shorter for TV (2 vs 5 days, P = 0.03). Thrombus was observed in five patients (two in TV; three in Epi), but no thromboembolic events were observed. Mean lead survival was similar (TV 9.9 vs Epi 7.8 years, P = NS). Energy threshold was lower at implant for TV leads (0.9 vs 2.2 microJ, P = 0.049), but similar at follow-up (1.2 vs 2.6 microJ, P = 0.35). Atrial sensing was unchanged over time for TV (2.2 to 2.1 mV, P = NS), but decreased for Epi (3.3 to 2.5 mV, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to epicardial leads, transvenous atrial pacing leads may be placed in Fontan patients with lower procedural morbidity and equivalent expectation of lead performance and longevity.