Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay after Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Risk-Adjustment Model

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2024 Risk Models for Lung Cancer Resection: Continued Refinement and Improved Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD) has been used to develop risk models for patients undergoing pulmonary resection for cancer. Leveraging a contemporary and more inclusive cohort, this study sought to refine these models.

METHODS

The study population consisted of adult patients in the STS GTSD who underwent pulmonary resection for cancer between 2015 and 2022. Unlike in previous models, nonelective operations were included. Separate risk models were derived for operative mortality, major morbidity, and composite morbidity or mortality. Logistic regression with backward selection was used with predictors retained in models if P < .10. All derived models were validated using 9-fold cross-validation. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed for the overall cohort and for surgical procedure, demographic, and risk factor subgroups.

RESULTS

Data from 140,927 patients at 337 participating centers were included in the study. Overall operative mortality rate was 1.1%, major morbidity was 7.3%, and composite morbidity or mortality was 7.6%. Novel predictors of short-term outcomes included interstitial lung disease, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide, and payer status. Overall discrimination was superior to previous STS pulmonary resection models for operative mortality (C-statistic = 0.80) and for composite morbidity or mortality (C-statistic = 0.70). Model discrimination was comparable and model calibration was excellent across all procedure- and demographic-specific subcohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Among STS GTSD participants, major morbidity and operative mortality rates remained low after pulmonary resection. The newly derived pulmonary resection risk models demonstrate superior performance compared with previous models, with broader real-life applicability and clinical face validity.

Insulin resistance and cancer: molecular links and clinical perspectives

The association between insulin resistance (IR), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and cancer is increasingly recognized and poses an escalating global health challenge, as the incidence of these conditions continues to rise. Studies indicate that individuals with T2DM have a 10-20% increased risk of developing various solid tumors, including colorectal, breast, pancreatic, and liver cancers. The relative risk (RR) varies depending on cancer type, with pancreatic and liver cancers showing a particularly strong association (RR 2.0-2.5), while colorectal and breast cancers demonstrate a moderate increase (RR 1.2-1.5). Understanding these epidemiological trends is crucial for developing integrated management strategies. Given the global rise in T2DM and cancer cases, exploring the complex relationship between these conditions is critical. IR contributes to hyperglycemia, chronic inflammation, and altered lipid metabolism. Together, these factors create a pro-tumorigenic environment conducive to cancer development and progression. In individuals with IR, hyperinsulinemia triggers the insulin-insulin-like growth factor (IGF1R) signaling pathway, activating cancer-associated pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PIK3CA), which promote cell proliferation and survival, thereby supporting tumor growth. Both IR and T2DM are linked to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. By providing an in-depth analysis of the molecular links between insulin resistance and cancer, this review offers valuable insights into the role of metabolic dysfunction in tumor progression. Addressing insulin resistance as a co-morbidity may open new avenues for risk assessment, early intervention, and the development of integrated treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Predictors of prolonged hospital stay after segmentectomy

OBJECTIVE

Segmentectomy is becoming the standard of care for small, peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. To improve perioperative management in this population, this study aims to identify factors influencing hospital length of stay after segmentectomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent segmentectomy for any indication between January 2018 and May 2023 were identified using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between clinical features and prolonged (≥3 days) hospital stay. A nomogram was designed to understand better and possibly calculate the individual risk of prolonged hospital stays.

RESULTS

In total, 533 cases were included; 337 (63%) were female. Median age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 63-75). The median size of resected lesions was 1.6 cm (IQR, 1.3-2.1 cm). Median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days). Major adverse events occurred in 31 (5.8%) cases. The 30-day readmission rate was 5.8% (n = 31). There was no 30-day mortality; 90-day mortality was <1%. Patients older than 75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.57, P = .02), those with forced expiratory volume in 1 second <88% predicted (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.38-2.89, P < .001), or positive smoking history (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.15-2.60, P = .01) were more likely to have prolonged hospital stays after segmentectomy. A nomogram accounting for age, sex, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, body mass index, smoking history, and comorbidities was created to predict the probability of prolonged hospital stay with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients, those with reduced pulmonary function, and current and past smokers have elevated risk for prolonged hospital stays after segmentectomy. Validation of our nomogram could improve perioperative risk stratification in patients who undergo segmentectomy.

Impacts of Positive Margins and Surgical Extent on Outcomes After Early-Stage Lung Cancer Resection

BACKGROUND

Sublobar resection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly considered appropriate but may compromise margins compared with lobectomy. This study evaluated resection extent, margin status, and survival in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with clinical T1-2 N0 M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (2006-2020) who were treated with primary surgery were compared stratified by margin status. The potential benefit of radiation was explored in subgroup analysis of patients who underwent sublobar resection with positive margins.

RESULTS

Positive margins occurred in 5089 (2.8%) of 181,824 patients and were more common in sublobar resections compared with lobectomy (4.3% vs 2.4%; P < .001). Sublobar resection had the strongest association with positive margins in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.91-2.23; P < .001). Patients with positive margins were more likely to undergo both adjuvant chemotherapy (16% vs 13%; P < .001) and radiation (17% vs 1%; P < .001) but had worse survival in univariate analysis (44.0% 5-year overall survival vs 69.2%; P < .001) and multivariable Cox analysis (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.63-1.78; P < .001) in the entire cohort, as well as in a univariate subset analysis of lobectomy (46.9% vs 70.4%; P < .001) and sublobar resection (37.5% vs 64.1%; P < .001). Postoperative radiation for patients who underwent sublobar resection with positive margins did not improve 5-year overall survival (36.3% for irradiated patients vs 38.3% for nonirradiated patients; P = .57), and patients who underwent sublobar resection with positive margins who were treated with radiation had survival inferior to that of patients who underwent lobectomy with negative margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive margins occur more frequently after sublobar resection of clinical stage I NSCLC compared with lobectomy. Patients with positive margins have worse survival than patients who undergo complete resection and are not rescued by postoperative radiation.

Association between inspired oxygen fraction and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist to guide oxygen administration during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery. We hypothesised that high intraoperative inspired oxygen fraction during lung resection surgery requiring one-lung ventilation is independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).

METHODS

We performed this retrospective multicentre study using two integrated perioperative databases (Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group and Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database) to study adult thoracic surgical procedures using one-lung ventilation. The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs (atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, respiratory failure, reintubation, and prolonged ventilation >48 h). The exposure of interest was high inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2), defined by area under the curve of a FiO2 threshold > 80%. Univariate analysis and logistic regression modelling assessed the association between intraoperative FiO2 and PPCs.

RESULTS

Across four US medical centres, 141/2733 (5.2%) procedures conducted in 2716 patients (55% female; mean age 66 yr) resulted in PPCs. FiO2 was univariately associated with PPCs (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.33, P=0.012). Logistic regression modelling showed that duration of one-lung ventilation (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.41, P=0.022), but not the time-weighted average FiO2 (aOR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, P=0.165), was associated with PPCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support limiting the inspired oxygen fraction for the purpose of reducing postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery involving one-lung ventilation.

Predictors of prolonged hospital stay in patients undergoing lung resection

PURPOSE

To identify potential predictors of prolonged length of hospital stay in patients submitted to lung resection surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cohort study, carried out in 105 patients with lung cancer, submitted to posterolateral thoracotomy pulmonary resection. Data collection included preoperative assessment of demographic, clinical, pulmonary function, respiratory muscle function, physical fitness, and behavioral habits. After surgery, length of hospital stay was documented, and the sample was divided into two groups according to the length of hospital stay (LOS): the normal hospital stay group (NLOS) until 8 days, and the prolonged hospital stay group (PLOS) with more than 8 days of hospital stay. Multiple linear regressions were performed between length of hospital stay and the studied variables, for the total sample and, specifically, for the PLOS group.

RESULTS

The multiple linear regression for the total sample, the most explanatory power variables were TLC, MIP, PEF, and BMI. When considering only the PLOS, the variables that mostly explained were the MIP%, MEP and TLC%.

CONCLUSION

Besides the classic outcomes used to calculate surgical risk, the body mass index, respiratory muscle strength, peak expiratory flow, and total lung capacity are predictors of the variation on length of hospital stay in patients submitted to lung resection.

Association between postoperative complications and hospital length of stay: a large-scale observational study of 4,495,582 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) registry

BACKGROUND

Precise estimates of risk-adjusted increases in postoperative length of stay (LOS) associated with postoperative complications across a range of complications and operations are not available in the existing literature.

METHODS

Associations between preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications and postoperative LOS were tested using medians, interquartile ranges, and nonparametric rank sum tests in a retrospective cohort study using the 2005-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset. A negative binomial model was used with postoperative LOS as the dependent variable and preoperative characteristics and postoperative complications as independent variables. The model was applied to estimate each patient's postoperative LOS with and without each postoperative complication to measure the association between each complication and risk-adjusted change in postoperative LOS.

RESULTS

A total of 4,495,582 patients were included. After risk-adjustment, occurrence of each postoperative complication was associated with significantly increased postoperative LOS (between + 3.9 and + 20.1 days, p < 0.0001). The longest risk-adjusted postoperative LOS increases were associated with prolonged ventilator use (+ 20.1 days), wound disruption (+ 19.4 days), and acute renal failure (+ 17.1 days).

CONCLUSION

Occurrence of any postoperative complication was associated with increased risk-adjusted postoperative LOS. Degree of increase varied by complication. These data could be useful for patient counseling, allocation of resources, discharge planning, and quality improvement efforts.

Maryland's Global Budget Revenue Program and Equitable Access to Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated equity in access to esophagectomy after Maryland's 2014 "Global Budget Revenue" (GBR) implementation, which equalizes reimbursement rates irrespective of patient insurance and employs an annual hospital revenue ceiling to incentivize reductions in unnecessary resource utilization. We hypothesized that more traditionally underserved patients would undergo surgical treatment for esophageal cancers after GBR.

METHODS

Using Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission database, we retrospectively analyzed patient demographics, insurance statuses, inflation-adjusted hospital charges, postoperative outcomes, and discharge dispositions for esophagectomies for neoplasms between 2012 and 2018.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty six patients were included: 22.0% (107) pre-GBR and 78.0% (379) post-GBR. The proportion of African-American patients increased post-GBR (5.6% versus 12.9%, P = 0.035) and subsequently exhibited year-over-year increases. While not statistically significant, the proportion of Medicaid patients increased from 4.7% to 10.0% (P = 0.085). The post-GBR era also saw patients from 10 new counties, six of which were in Maryland's bottom half of counties ranked by median household income, receive operative esophageal cancer treatment without losing representation from pre-GBR counties. Patient age and sex were comparable between the two groups, and there were no significant differences in mortality or 30-day readmissions. Inflation-adjusted hospital charges and length of hospital stay did not appreciably change post-GBR, including after adjusting for age, comorbidities, and surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

GBR increased access to esophagectomy for African-Americans, those insured by Medicaid, and those from lower socioeconomic status counties. Contrary to prior studies of outpatient and emergency room settings, we found the GBR program's goal of reduction of resource utilization and cost were not apparent in this complex surgical population.

Risk-adjusted discrete increases in length of stay by complication following anatomic lung resection: an analysis of 32 133 cases across the USA

OBJECTIVES

Prior studies have associated morbidity following anatomic lung resection with prolonged postoperative length of stay; however, each complication's individual impact on length of stay as a continuous variable has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk-adjusted increase in length of stay associated with each individual postoperative complications following anatomic lung resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent anatomic lung resection cataloged in the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use file, 2005-2018, were targeted. The association between preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications and length of stay in days was tested. A negative binomial model adjusting for the effect of preoperative characteristics and 18 concurrent postoperative complications was used to generate incidence rate ratios. This model was fit to generate risk-adjusted increases in length of stay by complication.

RESULTS

Of 32 133 patients, 5065 patients (15.8%) experienced at least one post-operative complication. The most frequent complications were pneumonia (n = 1829, 5.7%), the need for transfusion (n = 1794, 5.6%) and unplanned reintubation (n = 1064, 3.3%). The occurrence of each of the 18 individual complications was associated with significantly increased length of stay. This finding persisted after risk-adjustment, with the greatest risk-adjusted increases being associated with prolonged ventilation (+17.4 days), followed by septic shock (+17.2 days), acute renal failure (+16.5 days) and deep surgical site infection (+13.2 days).

CONCLUSIONS

All 18 postoperative complications studied following anatomic lung resection were associated with significant risk-adjusted increases in length of stay, ranging from an increase of 17.4 days with prolonged ventilation to 2.6 days following the need for transfusion.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Suspension Can Reduce the Length of Stay of Patients Undergoing Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fracture

BACKGROUND

Poorly controlled postoperative pain results in prolonged length of stay (LOS). The use of liposome bupivacaine injectable suspension (LB) for postoperative pain control is a relatively recent practice.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the following. In patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fracture(s), does the use of LB reduce LOS compared with regular bupivacaine?

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

We implemented a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with mandibular fracture(s) presented to Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, from January 2021 to January 2022. Adult patients diagnosed with 1 or more isolated mandibular fracture(s) and treated by open reduction and internal fixation were included. We excluded patients with non-isolated mandibular fracture(s), isolated condyle, infected, previously treated fractures, and documented allergy to amide local anesthetics and/or its preservatives.

PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

Primary predictor variable was local anesthetic (regular bupivacaine alone or LB/regular bupivacaine).

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S)

Primary outcome variable was LOS, defined as the number of days from surgical procedure until discharge. Secondary outcome variables were number of opioid prescription refill(s) and postoperative pain at discharge, determined with visual analogue scale.

COVARIATES

The covariates were Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking, alcohol exposure, illicit drug use, etiology, location, laterality, number of fracture(s), surgical approach, and method of maxillomandibular fixation.

ANALYSES

Univariate and bivariate analyses were calculated. Statistical significance was P < .05.

RESULTS

Sixty-two subjects met the inclusion criteria (31 subjects in each group). The mean ages in LB/regular bupivacaine and regular bupivacaine alone groups were 33.3 (±12) and 35.1 (±15.6), respectively (P = .94), the mean LOS in days was 0.23 (±0.44) in LB/regular bupivacaine and 1.48 (±1.77) in regular bupivacaine alone (P= < .001), and the mean VAS pain scores for LB/regular bupivacaine and regular bupivacaine alone groups were 0.53 (±1.07) and 1.87 (±2.66), respectively (P = .02). Mean number of opioid prescription refill(s) was 0 in LB/regular bupivacaine and 1 in regular bupivacaine alone group, respectively (P = .01).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The use of LB/regular bupivacaine for mandibular fracture(s) results in decrease in LOS and number of opioid refills compared to regular bupivacaine alone.

Longer hospitalizations, more complications, and greater readmissions for patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders undergoing pulmonary lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of comorbid psychiatric disorders (PSYD) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2018 was performed. Patients with lung cancer with and without psychiatric comorbidities who underwent pulmonary lobectomy were collated and analyzed (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification Mental, Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental disorders [F01-99]). The association of PSYD with complications, length of stay, and readmissions was assessed using a multivariable regression analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 41,691 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 27.84% (11,605) of the patients had at least 1 PSYD. PSYD was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications (relative risk, 1.041; 95% CI, 1.015-1.068; P = .0018), pulmonary complications (relative risk, 1.125; 95% CI, 1.08-1.171; P < .0001), longer length of stay (PSYD mean, 6.79 days and non-PSYD mean, 5.68 days; P < .0001), higher 30-day readmission rate (9.2% vs 7.9%; P < .0001), and 90-day readmission rate (15.4% vs 12.9%; P < .007). Among patients with PSYD, those with cognitive disorders and psychotic disorders (eg, schizophrenia) appear to have the highest rates and risks of postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lung cancer with comorbid psychiatric disorders undergoing lobectomy experience worse postoperative outcomes with longer hospitalization, increased rates of overall and pulmonary complications, and greater readmissions suggesting potential opportunities for improved psychiatric care during the perioperative period.

Intersurgeon variations in postoperative length of stay after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

Objectives

To identify factors associated with prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS) after VATS lobectomy (VATS-L), explore potential intersurgeon variation in LOS and ascertain whether or not early discharge influences hospital readmission rates.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent VATS-L at a single academic center between 2018 and 2021. Each VATS lobectomy procedure was performed by 1 of 7 experienced thoracic surgeons. The primary end point of interest was prolonged LOS, defined as an index LOS >3 days.

Results

Among 1006 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy, 632 (63%) had a prolonged LOS. On multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with prolonged LOS were: surgeon (P < .001), patient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06), operation time (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.01), postoperative complication (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.45-5.29), and prolonged air leak (OR, 8.95; 95% CI, 4.17-19.23). There was no significant association between LOS and gender, body mass index, coronary artery disease, prior atrial fibrillation, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, and prior ipsilateral thoracic surgery or sternotomy. There was no association between LOS ≤3 days and hospital readmission (20 [5.3%] vs 39 [5.9%]; OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.50-1.53).

Conclusions

An intersurgeon variation in postoperative LOS after VATS-L exists and is independent of patient baseline characteristics or perioperative complications. This variation seems to be more closely related to differences in postoperative management and discharge practices rather than to surgical quality. Postoperative discharge within 3 days is safe and does not increase hospital readmissions.

Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay and Related Factors After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Pre-enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Single Center Assessment

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy for lung cancer often presents a lot of potentially severe complications after surgery for patients. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a program to improve unexpected events. When implementing ERAS, there needs to be evidence of relevant factors that prolong hospital stays to encourage the participation of medical staff and leaders. This study is to determine the length of hospital stay (LOS) and its related factors after surgery in patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

 A descriptive retrospective study was conducted on 99 patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer at University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City. Data were extracted from a computerized database of patients who were hospitalized for lobectomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer from January 2018 to December 2021. The primary outcome was the postoperative LOS.

RESULTS

Median postoperative LOS was 5.2 days (interquartile range 4.8 to 6.8 days). The complication rate was 19.2%, of which Clavien-Dindo II accounted for the highest at 9.1%. The 30-day readmission rate was 13.1%. The median of LOS in the current cigarette smoker's group was 1.9 days higher than the never-cigarette smoker's group and 1.5 days higher than the former cigarette smokers (p<0.001). Tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) stage III showed the highest LOS compared to other stages (p=0.029). Open surgery and thoracoscopic conversion to open showed postoperative LOS about two days longer than thoracoscopic surgery (p<0.001). ​Performing muscle relaxation and early extubation, multimodal analgesia reduced postoperative LOS by 1.6 days (p<0.001), and preoperative physical therapy and early physical therapy at recovery reduced postoperative LOS by 1.3 days (p<0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between the duration of endotracheal retention, duration of thoracic drainage, amount of blood loss, and postoperative LOS (R>0.5, p<0.001). The duration of the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit and fasting time after surgery showed an average positive correlation with postoperative LOS (0.3

CONCLUSIONS

The median postoperative LOS was 5.2 days, and more than half of patients stayed in the hospital for over five days. Some factors affect the LOS, including current cigarette smokers, TNM stage, surgical approaches, some care processes such as early extubation, multimodal pain relief, physical therapy, vomiting, duration of thoracic drainage, amount of blood loss, duration of Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (hours), duration of thoracic drainage (days), preoperative and postoperative fasting time (hours). The study results help propose many changes in perioperative care for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Collapse

Key Words

• complications
• eras
• length of hospital stay
• lobectomy
• lung cancer
• vietnam

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ho Tat Bang Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VNM Health Organization and Management Department, Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VNM
Tran Thanh Vy Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VNM Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, VNM
Nguyen Van Tap Faculty of Medical Management, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, VNM

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Clinical tool for prognostication of discharge outcomes following craniotomy for meningioma

BACKGROUND

Patients' comorbidities might affect the immediate postoperative morbidity and discharge disposition after surgical resection of intracranial meningioma.

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of comorbidities on outcomes and provide a web-based application to predict time to favorable discharge.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the prospectively collected national inpatient sample (NIS) database was conducted for the years 2009-2013. Time to favorable discharge was defined as hospital length of stay (LOS). A favorable discharge was defined as a discharge to home and a non-home discharge destination was defined as an unfavorable discharge. Cox proportional hazards model was built. Full model for time to discharge and separate reduced models were built.

RESULTS

Of 10,757 patients who underwent surgery for meningioma, 6554 (60%) had a favorable discharge. The median hospital LOS was 3 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-5). In the full model, several clinical and socioeconomic factors were associated with a higher likelihood of unfavorable discharge. In the reduced model, 13 modifiable comorbidities were negatively associated with a favorable discharge except for drug abuse and obesity, which are not associated with discharge. Both models accurately predicted time to favorable discharge (c-index:0.68-0.71).

CONCLUSION

We developed a web application using robust prognostic model that accurately predicts time to favorable discharge after surgery for meningioma. Using this tool will allow physicians to calculate individual patient discharge probabilities based on their individual comorbidities and provide an opportunity to timely risk stratify and address some of the modifiable factors prior to surgery.

Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Oncological Outcomes for Patients Living With Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the association between preexisting diabetes in persons living with cancer on diabetes and oncology-related health outcomes. Understanding this association is of priority because the incidence of both cancer and diabetes mellitus is increasing worldwide.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted in collaboration with an expert health sciences librarian. Two authors independently conducted the screening, data collection, and extraction processes. The risk of bias was assessed using several tools, depending on the study design. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The alpha threshold was 0.05. All analyses were performed using R statistical software (Metaphor and Demeter packages).

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies met the selection criteria, but 23 were excluded from the synthesis because they did not have the ranked outcome or correct comparison (persons with and without diabetes), totaling 22 studies included in the meta-analysis. In comparison to participants without preexisting diabetes, participants with preexisting diabetes and cancer were found to have a significantly higher risk of infection and cardiovascular, neurological, gastrointestinal, hepatic, and renal complications. Concurrent preexisting diabetes and cancer were also associated with increased health care service utilization and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this review highlight the importance of optimal concurrent management of both diseases by overcoming the compartmentalization of medical specializations through (1) integrated, multidisciplinary, shared, and coordinated clinical care pathways between oncology and diabetes health care providers/teams and (2) the continued development of evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Predictive factors of prolonged postoperative length of stay after anatomic pulmonary resection

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study is to create a predictive model of prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS) in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection, to validate it in an external series and to evaluate the influence of PLOS on readmission and 90-day mortality.

METHODS

All patients registered in the GEVATS database discharged after the intervention were included. We define PLOS as the postoperative stay in days above the 75th percentile of stay for all patients in the series. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression and the model was validated in an external cohort. The possible association between PLOS and readmission and mortality at 90 days was analyzed.

RESULTS

3473 patients were included in the study. The median postoperative stay was 5 days (IQR: 4-7). 815 patients had PLOS (≥8 days), of which 79.9% had postoperative complications. The final model included as variables: age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy; the AUC in the referral series was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.661-0.706) and in the validation series was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.681-0.78). A significant association was found between PLOS and readmission (p < .000) and 90-day mortality (p < .000).

CONCLUSIONS

The variables age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy affect PLOS. PLOS is associated with an increased risk of readmission and 90-day mortality. 20% of PLOS are not related to the occurrence of postoperative complications.

Factors Associated with Early Discharge after Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Results from the Italian VATS Group Registry

Objective. There are limited data for estimating the risk of early discharge following thoracoscopic lobectomy. The objective was to identify the factors associated with a short length of stay and verify the influence of these variables in uncomplicated patients. Methods. We reviewed all lobectomies reported to the Italian VATS Group between January 2014 and January 2020. Patients and perioperative characteristics were divided into two subgroups based on whether or not they met the target duration of stay (≤ or >4 days). The association between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative length of stay (LOS) ≤4 days was assessed using a stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with LOS and factors related to LOS in uncomplicated cases. Results. Among 10,240 cases who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, 37.6% had a hospital stay ≤4 days. Variables associated with LOS included age, hospital surgical volume, Diffusion Lung CO % (81 [69−94] vs. 85 [73−98]), Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) % (92 [79−106] vs. 96 [82−109]), operative time (180 [141−230] vs. 160 [125−195]), uniportal approach (571 [9%] vs. 713 [18.5%]), bioenergy sealer use, and pain control through intercostal block or opioids (p < 0.001). Except for FEV1 and blood loss, all other factors emerged significantly associated with LOS when the analysis was limited to uncomplicated patients. Conclusions. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables are associated with early discharge after thoracoscopic lobectomy. This study indicates that these characteristics are associated with early discharge. This result can be used in association with clinical judgment to identify appropriate patients for fast-track protocols.

Factors Associated with Early Discharge after Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Results from the Italian VATS Group Registry

Objective. There are limited data for estimating the risk of early discharge following thoracoscopic lobectomy. The objective was to identify the factors associated with a short length of stay and verify the influence of these variables in uncomplicated patients. Methods. We reviewed all lobectomies reported to the Italian VATS Group between January 2014 and January 2020. Patients and perioperative characteristics were divided into two subgroups based on whether or not they met the target duration of stay (≤ or >4 days). The association between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative length of stay (LOS) ≤4 days was assessed using a stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with LOS and factors related to LOS in uncomplicated cases. Results. Among 10,240 cases who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, 37.6% had a hospital stay ≤4 days. Variables associated with LOS included age, hospital surgical volume, Diffusion Lung CO % (81 [69–94] vs. 85 [73–98]), Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) % (92 [79–106] vs. 96 [82–109]), operative time (180 [141–230] vs. 160 [125–195]), uniportal approach (571 [9%] vs. 713 [18.5%]), bioenergy sealer use, and pain control through intercostal block or opioids (p < 0.001). Except for FEV1 and blood loss, all other factors emerged significantly associated with LOS when the analysis was limited to uncomplicated patients. Conclusions. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables are associated with early discharge after thoracoscopic lobectomy. This study indicates that these characteristics are associated with early discharge. This result can be used in association with clinical judgment to identify appropriate patients for fast-track protocols.

The Effect of Major and Minor Complications After Lung Surgery on Length of Stay and Readmission

The effect of post-operative adverse events (AEs) on patient outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) and readmissions to hospital is not completely understood. This study examined the severity of AEs from a high-volume thoracic surgery center and its effect on the patient postoperative LOS and readmissions to hospital. This study includes patients who underwent an elective lung resection between September 2018 and January 2020. The AEs were grouped as no AEs, 1 or more minor AEs, and 1 or more major AEs. The effects of the AEs on patient LOS and readmissions were examined using a survival analysis and logistic regression, respectively, while adjusting for the other demographic or clinical variables. Among 488 patients who underwent lung surgery, (Wedge resection [n = 100], Segmentectomy [n = 51], Lobectomy [n = 310], Bilobectomy [n = 10], or Pneumonectomy [n = 17]) for either primary (n = 440) or secondary (n = 48) lung cancers, 179 (36.7%) patients had no AEs, 264 (54.1%) patients had 1 or more minor AEs, and 45 (9.2%) patients had 1 or more major AEs. Overall, the median of LOS was 3 days which varied significantly between AE groups; 2, 4, and 8 days among the no, minor, and major AE groups, respectively. In addition, type of surgery, renal disease (urinary tract infection [UTI], urinary retention, or acute kidney injury), and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score were significant predictors of LOS. Finally, 58 (11.9%) patients were readmitted. Readmission was significantly associated with AE group (P = 0.016). No other variable could significantly predict patient readmission. Overall, postoperative AEs significantly affect the postoperative LOS and readmission rates.

Offering lung resection to current smokers: An opportunity for more equitable care

OBJECTIVE

Minority patients with lung cancer are less likely to undergo surgical resection and experience worse survival than non-Hispanic White patients. Currently, 40% of thoracic surgeons require smoking cessation before surgery, which may disproportionately affect minority patients. Our objective was to assess the risk of smoking status on postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional database was queried for all patients who underwent surgical resection of a primary lung malignancy between 2006 and 2020. Operative mortality, major morbidity, and a composite of morbidity and mortality were compared between current smokers and prior smokers.

RESULTS

A total of 601 patients underwent resection, and 236 (39.3%) were current smokers. Current smokers were more likely to be younger (P < .01), to have a greater pack-years history (P = .03), and to have worse pulmonary function test results (P < .01). Pretreatment stage, surgical approach, and extent of resection were similar between groups. There was no difference in operative mortality (0.9% vs 1.9%, P = .49), major morbidity (12.7% vs 9.3%, P = .19), or composite major morbidity and mortality between groups (13.1% vs 9.3%, P = .14). After adjusting for pulmonary function status, current smoking status was not associated with mortality or major morbidity on multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-3.03, P = .24).

CONCLUSIONS

Current smokers experienced similar rates of mortality and major morbidity as prior smokers. In the context of continued racial and ethnic disparities in lung cancer survival, in particular decreased resection rates among minorities, smoking cessation requirements should not delay or prevent operative intervention for lung cancer.

Surgical complications and clinical outcomes after dose-escalated trimodality therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Trimodality therapy (TMT) with preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgical resection is used for locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Traditionally, preoperative radiation doses ≤54 Gy are used due to concerns regarding excess morbidity, but little is known about outcomes and toxicities after TMT with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to higher doses.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who received planned TMT with IMRT for LA-NSCLC at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Clinical and treatment characteristics, pathologic response, and surgical toxicity were assessed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for survival outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used for multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients received less than definitive doses of <60 Gy and 30 patients received definitive doses ≥60 Gy. Surgical outcomes, pathologic complete response, and postoperative toxicity did not differ significantly between the groups. With median follow-up of 3.6 years (range: 0.4-11.4), three-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (78.0% vs. 68.3%, p = 0.51) and overall survival (OS) (61.0% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.32) was not significantly different between patients receiving <60 Gy and ≥60 Gy, respectively. On multivariable analysis, older age, clinical stage, and length of hospital stay (LOS) >7 days were associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

With IMRT, there was no increased rate of surgical complications in patients receiving higher doses of radiation. Survival outcomes or LOS did not differ based on radiation dose, but increased LOS was associated with worse OS. Larger prospective studies are needed to further examine outcomes after IMRT in patients with LA-NSCLC receiving TMT.

Optimal Radiation Dose for Stage III Lung Cancer-Should "Definitive" Radiation Doses Be Used in the Preoperative Setting?

Introduction

There are currently two recommended radiation strategies for clinical stage III NSCLC: a lower "preoperative" (45-54 Gy) and a higher "definitive/nonsurgical" (60-70 Gy) dose. We sought to determine if definitive radiation doses should be used in the preoperative setting given that many clinical stage III patients planned for surgery are ultimately managed with chemoradiation alone.

Methods

Using the National Cancer Database data from 2006 to 2016, we performed a comparative effectiveness analysis of stage III N2 patients who received chemoradiotherapy. Patients were stratified into subgroups across 2 parameters: (1) radiation dose: lower (45-54 Gy) and higher (60-70 Gy); and (2) the use of surgery (i.e., surgical and nonsurgical treatment approaches). Long-term survival and perioperative outcomes were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models.

Results

A cohort of 961 patients received radiation before surgery including 321 who received a higher dose and 640 who received a lower dose. A higher preoperative dose revealed similar long-term mortality risk (hazard ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-1.21, p = 0.951) compared with a lower dose. There was no significant association between radiation dose and 90-day mortality (p = 0.982), 30-day readmission (p = 0.931), or prolonged length of stay (p = 0.052) in the surgical cohort. A total of 17,904 clinical-stage IIIA-N2 patients were treated nonsurgically, including 15,945 receiving higher and 1959 treated with a lower dose. A higher dose was associated with a reduction in long-term mortality risk (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.67, p < 0.001) compared with a lower dose.

Conclusions

For clinical stage III NSCLC, the administration of 60 to 70 Gy of radiation seems to be more effective than the lower dose for nonsurgical patients without compromising surgical safety for those that undergo resection. This evidence supports the implementation of 60 to 70 Gy as a single-dose strategy for both preoperative and definitive chemoradiotherapy.

The Survival Advantage of Lobectomy over Wedge Resection Lessens as Health-Related Life Expectancy Decreases

Introduction

Patients with early-stage NSCLC typically must choose between a surgery with superior local control (lobectomy) or one that preserves lung parenchyma (wedge). Recognizing that many patients with cancer have competing mortality risks unrelated to cancer, we investigated whether an established model of predicting life expectancy could be used to identify patients with stage I NSCLC for whom survival after wedge is not different from lobectomy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare was performed to evaluate survival among treatment-naive patients, diagnosed 2005-2015, who underwent lobectomy or wedge for stage I (≤2 cm tumors) NSCLC. Comorbidity-related life expectancy (CR-LE) was estimated using a standard life-table approach based on comorbid conditions, sex, and age. Cox models and perioperative complications were stratified by 5-year CR-LE.

Results

A total of 4560 patients (median age 74, interquartile range 70-78) were identified. CR-LE was greater than or equal to 5 years for 4016 patients (wedge = 23%). CR-LE was less than 5 years for 544 patients (wedge = 41%). Among patients with CR-LE greater than or equal to 5, wedge resection was associated with higher risk of mortality than lobectomy (hazard ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-1.86, p < 0.001). For those with CR-LE less than 5, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between lobectomy and wedge (hazard ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.47; p = 0.11). CR-LE less than five patients who underwent a lobectomy had higher 90-day mortality compared with wedge (9% versus 4%, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

The survival advantage of lobectomy over wedge for stage I NSCLC seems to dissipate among patients with shorter life expectancy owing to age and comorbidities. Wedge resection may be a reasonable option for patients at high risk of dying from non-cancer-related causes.

Outcomes in Lung Cancer Surgery: Capturing Reliable Metrics

BACKGROUND

Measuring variation in perioperative outcomes to accurately discriminate performance between surgical providers may be limited by reliability. We aimed to evaluate reliability estimates of metrics associated with lung cancer resection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2015 National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Primary outcomes were reliability estimates for perioperative outcomes and for measures of adherence to clinical benchmarks, generated through hierarchical multi-level modeling techniques.

RESULTS

We identified 27,300 patients undergoing resection. Overall risk- and reliability-adjusted 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 1.7% and 3.3%, respectively; 61.0% and 41.1% of eligible patients received stage-appropriate adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was performed in 59.6% of cases with clinical stage I disease. The mean reliability of 30- and 90-day mortality was 0.11 (standard deviation (SD) 0.09) and 0.22 (SD 0.15), respectively; for performing VATS for stage I disease, 0.97 (SD 0.04). When stratified by hospital volume quartile, the mean reliability of 30-day mortality was 0.04 (SD 0.03) in the lowest and 0.20 (SD 0.10) in the highest quartile. Only 14% of hospitals met an established 0.7 reliability benchmark for 30- and 90-day mortality, but over 97% of hospitals exceeded these benchmarks for providing stage-appropriate systemic therapy and performing VATS for stage I disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Metrics used to compare lung cancer surgical performance between providers have varying levels of reliability. Reliability should be considered when profiling providers, which will become particularly important as lung cancer treatment under screening programs continues to expand.

Discharging Patients by Postoperative Day One after Robotic Anatomic Pulmonary Resection

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to assess feasibility, safety, and to describe outcomes for patients discharged by postoperative day one (POD1) after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of a quality improvement initiative by a single surgeon. Factors associated with discharge by POD1 were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

From January 2018 to July 2020, 253 patients underwent robotic anatomic pulmonary resection of which 134 (53%) discharged by POD1, 67% post segmentectomy and 41% post lobectomy. Discharge by POD1 improved with experience and was achieved in 97% of patients post segmentectomy and 68% post lobectomy in the final quartile. Thirty-one (12%) patients were discharged home with a chest tube, including 7 (2.8%) on POD1. On multivariate analysis, never smokers and segmentectomy were associated with discharge by POD1. Conversely, decreased baseline performance status and perioperative complications were associated with discharge after POD1. There were 10 (4.0%) minor morbidities, 6 (2.4%) major morbidities, and no 30 or 90-day mortalities. There were 4 readmissions (1.6%), of which one (0.4%) was after POD1 discharge. Patient satisfaction remained high throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

With experience and communication, select patients can be discharged home on POD1 after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy with excellent outcomes and high satisfaction. Discharge by POD1 was associated with never smokers and segmentectomy, and inversely associated with decreased baseline performance status and perioperative complications.

Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and prolonged hospital stay in pulmonary resection patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pulmonary complications are the main cause of morbidity and mortality after pulmonary resection. This study was undertaken to determine the risk factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and length of hospital stay (LOS) in pulmonary resection patients in a tertiary teaching hospital in Brazil.

METHODS

A retrospective data gathering from 196 patients who underwent pulmonary resection between 2012 and 2016 was conducted. Demographic and hospital admission data were collected from patients with complete medical records. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by Poisson's regression for predicting the prevalence of postoperative pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (20%) displayed pulmonary complications in the postoperative period. The risk factors associated with an increased prevalence of postoperative pulmonary complications in a multivariate analysis were: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) ≥ 3 (PR 4.77, p = 0.03, 95% CI: 1.17 to 19.46), predicted diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide - corrected single breath (PR 0.98, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99) and age of the patient (PR 1.04; p = 0.01; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.06). Those associated with an increased prevalence of prolonged hospital stay were: duration of surgical procedure longer than five hours (PR 6.94, p = 0.01, 95% CI: 1.66 to 12.23), male sex (PR 5.72, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.87 to 9.58), and presence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PR 11.92, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 7.42 to 16.42).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications in the study population is in line with the world average. Recognizing risk factors for the development of PPCs may help optimize allocation resources and preventive efforts.

Early Discharge after Lobectomy for Lung Cancer does not Equate to Early Readmission

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in several specialties reduce length of stay, but accelerated discharge after thoracic surgery is not well characterized. This study tested the hypothesis that patients discharged on post-operative day 1 (POD1) after lobectomy for lung cancer have an increased risk of readmission.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a lobectomy for lung cancer between 2011-2019 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. Readmission rates were compared between patients discharged on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and patients discharged POD 2-6. Early discharge and readmission predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Only 854 (3.8%) of 22,585 patients that met inclusion criteria were discharged on POD1, though POD1 discharge rates increased from 2.3% to 8.1% (p< 0.001) from 2011 to 2019. Median hospitalization for POD2-6 patients was 4 days (IQR: 3-5). Patient characteristics associated with a lower likelihood of POD1 discharge were increasing age, smokers, or history of dyspnea, while a minimally invasive approach was the strongest predictor of early discharge (AOR 5.42, p<0.001). Readmission rates were not significantly different for POD1 and POD2-6 groups in univariate analysis (6.0% vs 7.0%, p=0.269). Further, POD1 discharge was not a risk factor for readmission in multivariable analysis (AOR 1.10, p=0.537).

CONCLUSIONS

Select patients can be discharged on POD1 after lobectomy for lung cancer without an increased readmission risk, supporting this accelerated discharge target inclusion in lobectomy ERAS protocols.

The role of gender in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

The role of gender in the development, treatment and prognosis of thoracic malignancies has been underappreciated and understudied. While most research has been grounded in tobacco-related malignancies, the incidence of non-smoking related lung cancer is on the rise and disproportionately affecting women. Recent research studies have unveiled critical differences between men and women with regard to risk factors, timeliness of diagnosis, incongruent screening practices, molecular and genetic mechanisms, as well as response to treatment and survival. These studies also highlight the increasingly recognized need for targeted therapies that account for variations in the response and complications as a function of gender. Similarly, screening recommendations continue to evolve as the role of gender is starting to be ellucidated. As women have been underrepresented in clinical trials until recently, the data regarding optimal care and outcomes is still lagging behind. Understanding the underlying similarities and differences between men and women is paramount to providing adequate care and prognostication to patients of either gender. This review provides an overview of the critical role that gender plays in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and other thoracic malignancies, with an emphasis on the need for increased awareness and further research to continue elucidating these disparities.

Waterlow score for risk assessment in surgical patients: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The Waterlow score (WS) is used routinely in clinical practice to assess risk of pressure sore development. Recent studies have also suggested its use in preoperative risk stratification. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence on the WS in predicting morbidity and mortality in surgical patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA and SWiM guidelines. A search strategy was conducted on the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

FINDINGS

Overall, 72 papers were identified, of which 7 met inclusion criteria for full text review, and 4 were included for analysis. All studies were cohort in nature and published between 2013 and 2016, encompassing a total of 505 surgical patients. The studies included general, vascular, transplant and orthopaedic surgery. A high WS was demonstrated to have statistically significant association with increased morbidity and mortality as well as need for intensive care unit admission and length of stay. Furthermore, this was a more accurate predictor compared with the P-POSSUM and ASA scoring systems used currently in routine practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The WS is a promising tool for risk stratification of surgical patients. It is already collected routinely by nursing staff throughout hospitals in the UK and would therefore be easy to implement. However, further large prospective studies are required in order to validate these findings prior to its establishment for this role in everyday surgical practice.

Tailored anaesthesia for thoracoscopic surgery promoting enhanced recovery: The state of the art

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The current review focuses on precise anaesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with the goal of enhanced recovery. The main aim of an enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery is to reduce postoperative stress response, protect from postoperative pulmonary complications, give hospitals a better financial option and improve overall patient outcome. This can ultimately reduce hospital stay and increase patient satisfaction. With advances in endoscopic, robotic and endovascular techniques, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can be performed in a minimally invasive way in managing most pulmonary, pleural and mediastinal diseases. As a minimally invasive technique, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) represents an important element of enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery as it can achieve most of its goals. Anaesthetic management during preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative period is essential for the establishment of a successful enhanced recovery program. In the era of enhanced recovery protocols, non-intubated thoracoscopic procedures present a step forward. This article focuses on the key anaesthetic elements of the enhanced recovery program during all phases of thoracoscopic surgery. Having reviewed recent literature, a systematic review of literature will highlight successful ERAS protocols published for thoracoscopic surgery.

Sugammadex is associated with shorter hospital length of stay after open lobectomy for lung cancer: a retrospective observational study

Background

Sugammadex is associated with few postoperative complications. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) are related to prolonged hospitalizations. Present study explored whether the use of sugammadex could reduce PPCs and thereby reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) after lung surgery.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent elective open lobectomy for lung cancer from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were divided into the sugammadex group and pyridostigmine group.

The primary outcome was hospital LOS and secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and overall survival at 1 year. The cohort was subdivided into patients with and without prolonged LOS to explore the effects of sugammadex on outcomes in each group. Risk factors for LOS were determined via multivariate analyses. After propensity score matching, 127 patients were assigned to each group.

Results

Median hospital LOS was shorter (10.0 vs. 12.0 days) and the incidence of postoperative atelectasis was lower (18.1 vs. 29.9%) in the sugammadex group. However, no significant difference in overall survival between the groups was seen over 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.967; 95% confidence interval, 0.363 to 2.577). Sugammadex was a predictor related to LOS (exponential coefficient 0.88; 95% CI 0.82–0.95).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that sugammadex is a preferable agent for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal than cholinesterase inhibitors in this patient population.

Trial registration

This study registered in the Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea National Institute of Health (approval number: KCT0004735, Date of registration: 21 January 2020, Retrospectively registered).

Surgical Risk Following Anatomic Lung Resection in Thoracic Surgery: A Prediction Model Derived from a Spanish Multicenter Database

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to develop a surgical risk prediction model in patients undergoing anatomic lung resections from the registry of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group (GEVATS).

METHODS

Data were collected from 3,533 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for any diagnosis between December 20, 2016 and March 20, 2018. We defined a combined outcome variable: death or Clavien Dindo grade IV complication at 90 days after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression. Internal validation of the model was performed using resampling techniques.

RESULTS

The incidence of the outcome variable was 4.29% (95% CI 3.6-4.9). The variables remaining in the final logistic model were: age, sex, previous lung cancer resection, dyspnea (mMRC), right pneumonectomy, and ppo DLCO. The performance parameters of the model adjusted by resampling were: C-statistic 0.712 (95% CI 0.648-0.750), Brier score 0.042 and bootstrap shrinkage 0.854.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk prediction model obtained from the GEVATS database is a simple, valid, and reliable model that is a useful tool for establishing the risk of a patient undergoing anatomic lung resection.

Prediction of Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay After Cancer Surgery Using Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative length of stay is a key indicator in the management of medical resources and an indirect predictor of the incidence of surgical complications and the degree of recovery of the patient after cancer surgery. Recently, machine learning has been used to predict complex medical outcomes, such as prolonged length of hospital stay, using extensive medical information.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a prediction model for prolonged length of stay after cancer surgery using a machine learning approach.

METHODS

In our retrospective study, electronic health records (EHRs) from 42,751 patients who underwent primary surgery for 17 types of cancer between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017, were sourced from a single cancer center. The EHRs included numerous variables such as surgical factors, cancer factors, underlying diseases, functional laboratory assessments, general assessments, medications, and social factors. To predict prolonged length of stay after cancer surgery, we employed extreme gradient boosting classifier, multilayer perceptron, and logistic regression models. Prolonged postoperative length of stay for cancer was defined as bed-days of the group of patients who accounted for the top 50% of the distribution of bed-days by cancer type.

RESULTS

In the prediction of prolonged length of stay after cancer surgery, extreme gradient boosting classifier models demonstrated excellent performance for kidney and bladder cancer surgeries (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] >0.85). A moderate performance (AUC 0.70-0.85) was observed for stomach, breast, colon, thyroid, prostate, cervix uteri, corpus uteri, and oral cancers. For stomach, breast, colon, thyroid, and lung cancers, with more than 4000 cases each, the extreme gradient boosting classifier model showed slightly better performance than the logistic regression model, although the logistic regression model also performed adequately. We identified risk variables for the prediction of prolonged postoperative length of stay for each type of cancer, and the importance of the variables differed depending on the cancer type. After we added operative time to the models trained on preoperative factors, the models generally outperformed the corresponding models using only preoperative variables.

CONCLUSIONS

A machine learning approach using EHRs may improve the prediction of prolonged length of hospital stay after primary cancer surgery. This algorithm may help to provide a more effective allocation of medical resources in cancer surgery.

Effect of On-Site Cardiac Surgery Program on General Thoracic Surgery Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Limited data exist exploring the relationship between multispecialty surgical collaboration and outcomes in general thoracic surgery. To address this, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was analyzed to determine whether the presence of an on-site cardiac surgery program is associated with improved general thoracic surgery outcomes.

METHODS

The NIS (1999-2008) was utilized to identify 389,959 patients who had a lobectomy, pneumonectomy, or esophagectomy. Short-term outcomes of patients undergoing these procedures were compared between hospitals with and without an on-site cardiac surgery program. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine patient and hospital predictors of mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

During the study period, patients undergoing lobectomy (n = 314,130), pneumonectomy (n = 34,860), or esophagectomy (n = 40,969) were identified. Univariate analysis demonstrated lower mortality for lobectomy (P < 0.001) and esophagectomy (P < 0.001) but not pneumonectomy (P = 0.344) in hospitals with a cardiac surgery program. All-cause morbidity was significantly lower for all 3 procedures in hospitals with a cardiac surgery program. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that a cardiac surgery program was not an independent predictor when adjusted for known confounders, particularly procedure volume and hospital academic teaching status.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an on-site cardiac surgery program is not in and of itself associated with improved general thoracic surgery outcomes. The presence of a cardiac surgery program is likely a surrogate for other known predictors of improved outcomes such as hospital teaching status and procedure volume.

"Are We Gonna Talk About It or Not?" Thoracic Oncology Provider Perspectives on Smoking Cessation

BACKGROUND

Tobacco use is the greatest preventable cause of death and disease in the United States. Despite recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Preventive Task Force, and major professional societies that all health-care providers provide smoking-cessation counseling, smoking-cessation interventions are not consistently delivered in clinical practice. We sought to identify important barriers and facilitators to the utilization of smoking-cessation interventions in a thoracic oncology program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted 14 semistructured interviews with providers including thoracic surgeons (n = 3), interventional pulmonologists (n = 1), medical oncologists (n = 3), radiation oncologists (n = 2), and nurses (n = 5). Interviewees were asked about prior and current smoking-cessation efforts, their perspectives on barriers to successful smoking cessation, and opportunities for improvement. Responses were analyzed inductively to identify common themes.

RESULTS

All interviewees report discussing smoking cessation with their patients and realize the importance of a smoking-cessation counseling; however, smoking-cessation interventions are inconsistent and often lacking. Providers emphasized five domains that impact their delivery of smoking-cessation interventions: patient willingness and motivation to quit, clinical engagement and follow-up, documentation of smoking history, provider education in smoking cessation, and the availability of additional smoking-cessation resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers recognize the need for more efficient and consistent smoking-cessation interventions. Therefore, the development of interventions that address this need would not only be easily taught to providers and delivered to patients but also be welcomed into clinics.

Early Postoperative Functional Assessment Predicts Non-Home Discharge After Pulmonary Lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Non-home hospital disposition is an important patient-centric quality measure, and is increasingly tied to reimbursements. We sought to determine the value of early postoperative functional assessment to predict non-home discharge.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective pulmonary lobectomy between May 2017 and December 2018 were identified from The Society of Thoracic Surgery database at a single institution. Early postoperative functional assessment using the Boston University Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) basic mobility short form was routinely performed by the inpatient rehabilitation services. The association of baseline patient characteristics and AM-PAC scores with nonhospital discharge was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients (median age 65 years, 59% female) underwent lobectomy. First postoperative functional assessment was performed at a median of 1 day (interquartile range, 1 to 2) after surgery. Median AM-PAC score was 18 (interquartile range, 17 to 19), correlating to a 47% functional impairment in daily activities. Thirteen patients (5.4%) were discharged to an extended care facility instead of home. Non-home discharge was more commonly observed for patients of older age or with prior history of stroke. First postoperative AM-PAC score was able to discriminate hospital disposition (area under the curve 0.714; 95% confidence interval, 0.594 to 0.834; P = .009). Adjusted for patient factors and performance status, first postoperative AM-PAC score was independently associated with non-home discharge (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.81; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Early postoperative functional impairment assessment using AM-PAC may be useful to predict non-hospital discharge after pulmonary lobectomy. Attention to these factors may be used to aid early disposition planning, and adjust preventative strategies.

Volume Pledge is Not Associated with Better Short-Term Outcomes After Lung Cancer Resection

PURPOSE

We examined the relationship between short-term outcomes and hospitals and surgeons who met minimum volume thresholds for lung cancer resection based on definitions provided by the Volume Pledge. A secondary aim was to evaluate the volume-outcome relationship to determine alternative thresholds in the event the Volume Pledge was not associated with outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study (2015-2017) using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. We used generalized estimating equations that accounted for confounding and clustering to compare outcomes across hospitals and surgeons who did and did not meet the Volume Pledge criteria: ≥ 40 patients per year for hospitals and ≥ 20 patients per year for surgeons. Our secondary aim was to model volume by using restricted cubic splines to determine the association between volume and short-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 32,183 patients, 465 surgeons, and 209 hospitals, 16,630 patients (52%) received care from both a hospital and surgeon meeting the Volume Pledge criteria. After adjustment, there was no relationship with operative mortality, complications, major morbidity, a major morbidity-mortality composite end point, or failure to rescue. The Volume Pledge group had a 0.5 day (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7 day) shorter length of stay. Our secondary aim revealed a nonlinear relationship between hospital volume and complications in which intermediate-volume hospitals had the highest risk of complications. Surgeon volume was associated with major morbidity, a major morbidity-mortality composite end point, and length of stay in an inverse linear fashion. Only 8% of surgeons had volumes associated with better outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The Volume Pledge was not associated with better outcomes except for a marginally shorter length of stay. A re-examination of volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and surgeons yielded mixed results that did not reveal a practical alternative for volume-based quality improvement efforts.

Gender-specific differences in care-seeking behaviour among lung cancer patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In the literature, men are often described as unwilling to use healthcare services, whereas women as frequent users. We conducted a systematic literature review to examine the gender differences in healthcare utilisation of lung cancer patients. Our aim was to synthesise evidence to assess whether men and women utilise cancer diagnosis and treatments differently.

METHODS

The databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO Host, Ovid nursing, and Cochrane was systematically searched. We used pre-defined eligibility criteria to identify peer-reviewed published literature that reported healthcare use of lung cancer patients. Two reviewers independently screened the title, abstract, full texts and retrieved relevant data.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies met the eligibility criteria from 1356 potential studies. In these studies, the most commonly measured healthcare utilisation is surgery (n = 19), followed by chemotherapy (n = 13). All the studies were from developed countries and had a higher percentage of male participants. Substantial evidence of heterogeneity in the use of treatments by gender were found. In relation to diagnosis interval and stage of cancer diagnosis, it was found that women had longer diagnostic intervals. Nonetheless, women tend to get diagnosed at an earlier stage. Furthermore, women had a higher probability of using inpatient cancer-care services and surgical treatments. Conversely, men had greater risks of readmission after surgery and longer length of stay. Lastly, there were no significant gender differences in the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study synthesised evidence of disparities in the use of lung cancer treatments based on gender in developed countries, with no evidence available from least-developed and developing countries. Further studies are required to understand this gender-specific inequality and to design interventions to improve the survival rate of lung cancer patients.

Evaluation of effects of perioperative oral care intervention on hospitalization stay and postoperative infection in patients undergoing lung cancer intervention

PURPOSE

This retrospective study investigated the effect of perioperative oral care intervention on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lung cancer resection, in terms of the length of postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative respiratory infections.

METHODS

In total, 585 patients underwent lung resection for lung cancer, 397 received perioperative oral care intervention, whereas the remaining 188 did not. This study retrospectively investigated the demographic and clinical characteristics (including postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay) of each group. To determine whether perioperative oral care intervention was independently associated with either postoperative hospital stay or postoperative respiratory infections, multivariate analysis, multiple regression analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Parameters significantly associated with a prolonged postoperative hospital stay in lung cancer surgery patients were older age, postoperative complications, increased intraoperative bleeding, more invasive operative approach (e.g., open surgery), and lack of perioperative oral care intervention (standard partial regression coefficient (ß) = 0.083, p = 0.027). Furthermore, older age and longer operative time were significant independent risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative respiratory infections. Lack of perioperative oral care intervention was a potential risk factor for the occurrence of postoperative respiratory infections, although not statistically significant (odds ratio = 2.448, 95% confidence interval = 0.966-6.204, p = 0.059).

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the importance of perioperative oral care intervention prior to lung cancer surgery, in order to shorten postoperative hospital stay and reduce the risk of postoperative respiratory infections.

Protective ventilation during anaesthesia reduces major postoperative complications after lung cancer surgery: A double-blind randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Thoracic surgery for lung resection is associated with a high incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Controlled ventilation with a large tidal volume has been documented to be a risk factor for postoperative respiratory complications after major abdominal surgery, whereas the use of low tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has a protective effect.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of ventilation with low tidal volume and PEEP on major complications after thoracic surgery.

DESIGN

A double-blind, randomised controlled study.

SETTING

A multicentre trial from December 2008 to October 2011.

PATIENTS

A total of 346 patients undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the occurrence of major postoperative complications (pneumonia, acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, shock, myocardial infarction or death) within 30 days after surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either lung-protective ventilation (LPV group) [tidal volume 5 ml kg ideal body weight + PEEP between 5 and 8 cmH2O] or nonprotective ventilation (control group) (tidal volume 10 ml kg ideal body weight without PEEP) during anaesthesia.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped prematurely because of an insufficient inclusion rate. Major postoperative complications occurred in 23/172 patients in the LPV group (13.4%) vs. 38/171 (22.2%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.95, P = 0.03). The incidence of other complications (supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia, bronchial obstruction, pulmonary atelectasis, hypercapnia, bronchial fistula and persistent air leak) was also lower in the LPV group (37.2 vs. 49.4%, odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.92, P = 0.02).The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the LPV group, 11 [interquartile range, 9 to 15] days vs. 12 [9 to 16] days, P = 0.048.

CONCLUSION

Compared with high tidal volume and no PEEP, LPV combining low tidal volume and PEEP during anaesthesia for lung cancer surgery seems to improve postoperative outcomes.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00805077.

Patient Satisfaction After Lung Cancer Surgery: Do Clinical Outcomes Affect Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems Scores?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about patients' hospital experience and satisfaction after lung cancer surgery. We sought to determine how length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative complications affect hospital consumer assessment of health care providers and systems (HCAHPS) scores.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lung resection for cancer at a single academic cancer center between years 2014 and 2018 were analyzed. Clinical data were derived from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons institutional database and supplemented with HCAHPS survey data. Endpoints were "top-box" satisfaction scores and domain-specific scores for physicians and nurses communication.

RESULTS

In total, 181 of 478 patients (38%) who underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer completed HCAHPS surveys. Median age was 65 years, and most patients underwent lobectomy (94%). The top-box rating for the overall hospital experience, physician communication, and nurse communication were 92%, 84%, and 69%, respectively. Overall and major complication rates were 43% and 3%, and were not associated with top-box HCAHPS scores. Increasing length of stay was associated with worse satisfaction with provider communication. Adjusted for patient factors, increasing length of stay was associated with worse patient satisfaction in the domains of communication with physicians and nurses. Patients with length of stay more than 6 days were less likely to endorse that doctors gave understandable explanations (odds ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.56) and that nurses listened carefully (odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall HCAHPS satisfaction scores after lung resection for cancer were high and were negatively associated with increasing length of stay. Patient satisfaction may be affected more by the perception of effective communication during prolonged hospitalizations than by complications.

Age Does Not Affect Metoprolol's Effect on Perioperative Outcomes (From the POISE Database)

BACKGROUND:

Perioperative β-blockade reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction but increases that of death, stroke, and hypotension. The elderly may experience few benefits but more harms associated with β-blockade due to a normal effect of aging, that of a reduced resting heart rate. The tested hypothesis was that the effect of perioperative β-blockade is more significant with increasing age.

METHODS:

To determine whether the effect of perioperative β-blockade on the primary composite event, clinically significant hypotension, myocardial infarction, stroke, and death varies with age, we interrogated data from the perioperative ischemia evaluation (POISE) study. The POISE study randomly assigned 8351 patients, aged ≥45 years, in 23 countries, undergoing major noncardiac surgery to either 200 mg metoprolol CR daily or placebo for 30 days. Odds ratios or hazard ratios for time to events, when available, for each of the adverse effects were measured according to decile of age, and interaction term between age and treatment was calculated. No adjustment was made for multiple outcomes.

RESULTS:

Age was associated with higher incidences of the major outcomes of clinically significant hypotension, myocardial infarction, and death. Age was associated with a minimal reduction in resting heart rate from 84.2 (standard error, 0.63; ages 45–54 years) to 80.9 (standard error, 0.70; ages >85 years; P < .0001). We found no evidence of any interaction between age and study group regarding any of the major outcomes, although the limited sample size does not exclude any but large interactions.

CONCLUSIONS:

The effect of perioperative β-blockade on the major outcomes studied did not vary with age. Resting heart rate decreases slightly with age. Our data do not support a recommendation for the use of perioperative β-blockade in any age subgroup to achieve benefits but avoid harms. Therefore, current recommendations against the use of β-blockers in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery apply across all age groups.

Development and Evaluation of a New Frailty Index for Older Surgical Patients With Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Frailty based on the modified Frailty Index is associated with poor postoperative outcomes. However, the index requires high levels of personnel time and effort and often has missing data.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Frailty Index (MSK-FI) with established geriatric assessment (GA) and surgical outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included prospectively evaluated patients with cancer 75 years and older who were referred to MSK Geriatrics Service clinics for preoperative evaluation before undergoing surgery requiring hospitalization between February 2015 and September 2017. Patients were comanaged by the Geriatrics Service and Surgery Service in the postoperative period.

EXPOSURES

Impairments identified by GA and comorbid conditions retrieved from submitted International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes within the first 48 hours of hospitalization.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The association of MSK-FI score (which included ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes) with GA impairments (based on clinical interview and examination as well as patient reports) was examined. The associations of MSK-FI score with short-term surgical outcomes (ie, frequency of complications, length of stay, 30-day surgical complications, 30-day intensive care unit admissions, and 30-day readmissions) and 1-year survival, estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods, were determined.

RESULTS

In total, 1137 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 80 [77-84] years; 583 [51.2%] women) were included in the study. A higher MSK-FI score was associated with the number of GA impairments (ρ = 0.52; bootstrapped 95% CI, 0.47-0.56). Each 1-point increase in MSK-FI score was associated with longer length of stay (0.58 d; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95; P = .002) and higher odds of intensive care unit admission (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04-1.58; P = .02). Median (interquartile range) follow-up among survivors was 12.1 (5.6-19.1) months. The MSK-FI score was associated with overall mortality; 12-month risk of death was 5% for a score of 0 and approximately 20% for scores of 4 and higher (nonlinear association, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, the MSK-FI was associated with the previously validated GA and postoperative outcomes in older patients with cancer and may be a feasible tool for perioperative assessment of older surgical patients with cancer. Future studies should assess the association of MSK-FI score with postoperative care and outcomes of older, frail patients with cancer.

Perioperative outcome of lung cancer surgery in women: results from a Spanish nationwide prospective cohort study

Background

To assess possible differences in the perioperative profile between men and women in lung cancer surgery.

Methods

A prospective cohort multicenter study was design, in which consecutive patients undergoing curative intent surgery for lung cancer in 24 Thoracic Services throughout Spain were included. Clinical features, tumor- and surgery-related data, postoperative complications, and mortality were recorded.

Results

There were 2,566 men and 741 women. Women were younger than men [mean (SD) age, 61.8 (10.8) vs. 66.5 (9.1) years, P<0.0001] and showed a more favorable preoperative characteristics, with significantly higher percentages of ECOG grade 0 and lower percentages of active smokers (28.4% vs. 33.9%; pack-years 18.8 vs. 26.9) and comorbidities [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, hypertension, cardiac disorders]. There were significant differences (P<0.001) in histological types and TNM stages with adenocarcinoma (70.1% vs. 46.4%) and IA stage (41.5% vs. 33.6%) more frequent in women. The use of VATS or thoracotomy was similar. The rate of pneumonectomy was higher in men (10.9%) than in women (5.1%) (P<0.001) but the distributions of other procedures were similar. Postoperative complications (pneumonitis, atelectasis, air leak, hemorrhage, fistula, empyema, wound dehiscence, and need of reintubation) were lower in women. Significant differences (P<0.0001) in the severity of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) were also found, with higher percentages of grades I (51.6% vs. 43%) and II (37.5% vs. 33%) and lower percentages of grades III and IV among women. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.8 (7.1) days in men versus 6.3 (5.0) days in women, and the 30-day mortality rate 0.3% in women versus 2.9% in men (P<0.0001). The percentage of readmissions within 30 days after surgery was also higher in men (8.6% vs. 2.8%).

Conclusions

This multicenter nationwide study of lung cancer surgery with curative intent shows that the perioperative profile is better in women than in men.

Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer in patients with impaired pulmonary function

Background

Patients with impaired lung function or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are considered high-risk for intubated general anesthesia, which may preclude them from surgical treatment of their lung cancers. We evaluated the feasibility of non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the surgical management of lung cancer in patients with impaired pulmonary function.

Methods

From August 2009 to June 2015, 28 patients with impaired lung function (preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second <70% of the predicted value) underwent non-intubated VATS using a combination of thoracic epidural anesthesia or intercostal nerve block, and intra-thoracic vagal block with target-controlled sedation.

Results

Eighteen patients had primary lung cancers, 4 had metastatic lung cancers, and 6 had non-malignant lung tumors. In the patients with primary lung cancer, lobectomy was performed in 4, segmentectomy in 3 and wedge resection in 11, with lymph node sampling adequate for staging. One patient required conversion to intubated one-lung ventilation because of persistent wheezing and labored breathing. Five patients developed air leaks more than 5 days postoperatively while subcutaneous emphysema occurred in 6 patients. Two patients developed acute exacerbations of pre-existing COPD, and new-onset atrial fibrillation after surgery occurred in 1 patient. The median duration of postoperative chest tube drainage was 3 days while the median hospital stay was 6 days.

Conclusions

Non-intubated VATS resection for pulmonary tumors is technically feasible. It may be applied as an alternative to intubated general anesthesia in managing lung cancer in selected patients with impaired pulmonary function.