Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: etiology and outcomes in the continuous-flow era

Outcomes of treatment for deep left ventricular assist device infection

OBJECTIVE

Among left ventricular assist device patients, the most commonly infected component is the drive line, which can be managed with antibiotics and local debridement. Infection of intrathoracic device components is less common but more difficult to manage. Herein we describe the incidence of deep device infection (DDI) at our center as well as management and outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 658 patients who underwent implantable left ventricular assist device insertion with HeartMate 2 (Abbott) or HeartMate 3 (Abbott) devices between January 2004 and June 2021. DDI was defined according to radiographic and clinical criteria. Cumulative incidence was calculated using a Fine-Gray subdistribution model; survival analysis was performed using the method of Kaplan and Meier.

RESULTS

There were 32 (4.8%) DDIs during this study period. Drive line infection and re-exploration for bleeding were associated with development of DDI. Cumulative incidence of DDI increased over time, affecting 11% (7%-18%) at 5 years. The dominant microbes involved in DDI were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (13%). Nineteen patients (59%) with device infection underwent device exchange, 6 (19%) underwent initial transplant, and 7 (22%) were treated solely with debridement and antibiotics. Of those who underwent device exchange, 12 (63%) developed reinfection of their new device and 6 underwent subsequent heart transplant. Patients who underwent transplantation for management of device infection had improved 5-year survival (80% vs 11%; P = .01) but 3 patients (25%) developed deep sternal wound infection after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

DDI is a rare but challenging complication in this destination era. Heart transplantation is the preferred management strategy for eligible patients but infectious complication is common.

Absorbable antibiotic beads for treatment of LVAD driveline infections

BACKGOUND

Infections of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) driveline are a dreaded complication that results in high mortality and morbidity.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with severe continuous-flow LVAD (HVAD, Heartmate 2, and Heartmate 3) driveline infection. These infections, which developed on an average of 960.4 ± 843.9 days after LVAD placement, were refractory to systemic antibiotics and local wound care. All were treated with extensive surgical debridement, local installation of absorbable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (vancomycin and tobramycin), primary wound closure, and 6 weeks of systemic antibiotics after surgery.

RESULTS

Four patients had resolution of DLI, and one had a recurrent infection at another part of the driveline 7 months after the complete resolution of the previous site. This patient was successfully treated with debridement and bead placements. Three patients still have their LVADs, while two received orthotopic heart transplants. At the time of the transplant, there was no evidence of gross infection of the LVAD drivelines or pumps. At the average follow-up time of 425.8 ± 151 days, no patients have an active infection.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of LVAD driveline infection with absorbable antibiotic beads with primary wound closure is a viable option and merits further investigation.

Special Considerations for Advanced Heart Failure Surgeries: Durable Left Ventricular Devices and Heart Transplantation

Heart transplantation and durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent two definitive therapies for end-stage heart failure in the modern era. Despite technological advances, both treatment modalities continue to experience unique risks that impact surgical and perioperative decision-making. Here, we review special populations and factors that impact risk in LVAD and heart transplant surgery and examine critical decisions in the management of these patients. As both heart transplantation and the use of durable LVADs as destination therapy continue to increase, these considerations will be of increasing relevance in managing advanced heart failure and improving outcomes.

Left ventricular assist device-associated driveline infections as a specific form of complicated skin and soft tissue infection/acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection - issues and therapeutic options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review comments on the current guidelines for the treatment of wound infections under definition of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). However, wound infections around a catheter, such as driveline infections of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are not specifically listed under this definition in any of the existing guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Definitions and classification of LVAD infections may vary across countries, and the existing guidelines and recommendations may not be equally interpreted among physicians, making it unclear if these infections can be considered as ABSSSI. Consequently, the use of certain antibiotics that are approved for ABSSSI may be considered as 'off-label' for LVAD infections, leading to rejection of reimbursement applications in some countries, affecting treatment strategies, and hence, patients' outcomes. However, we believe driveline exit site infections related to LVAD can be included within the ABSSSI definition.

SUMMARY

We argue that driveline infections meet the criteria for ABSSSI which would enlarge the 'on-label' antibiotic armamentarium for treating these severe infections, thereby improving the patients' quality of life.

Advanced Heart Failure: Therapeutic Options and Challenges in the Evolving Field of Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Heart Failure is a chronic and progressively deteriorating syndrome that has reached epidemic proportions worldwide. Improved outcomes have been achieved with novel drugs and devices. However, the number of patients refractory to conventional medical therapy is growing. These advanced heart failure patients suffer from severe symptoms and frequent hospitalizations and have a dismal prognosis, with a significant socioeconomic burden in health care systems. Patients in this group may be eligible for advanced heart failure therapies, including heart transplantation and chronic mechanical circulatory support with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Heart transplantation remains the treatment of choice for eligible candidates, but the number of transplants worldwide has reached a plateau and is limited by the shortage of donor organs and prolonged wait times. Therefore, LVADs have emerged as an effective and durable form of therapy, and they are currently being used as a bridge to heart transplant, destination lifetime therapy, and cardiac recovery in selected patients. Although this field is evolving rapidly, LVADs are not free of complications, making appropriate patient selection and management by experienced centers imperative for successful therapy. Here, we review current LVAD technology, indications for durable MCS therapy, and strategies for timely referral to advanced heart failure centers before irreversible end-organ abnormalities.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device

The literature regarding Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) patients is limited. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the clinical course, risk factors, management, and outcomes of LVAD patients who developed CDI. Adult patients who underwent LVAD placement during 2010-2022 and developed CDI were included. To determine risk factors and outcomes, we matched CDI patients with LVAD patients who did not develop CDI. Each CDI case was matched with up to two control subjects by age, sex, and time from LVAD implantation. Forty-seven of 393 LVAD patients (12.0%) developed CDI. The median time from LVAD implantation to CDI was 147 days (interquartile range 22.5-647.0). The most common CDI treatment was oral vancomycin (n = 26, 55.3%). Thirteen patients (27.7%) required treatment extension because of a lack of clinical response. Three patients (6.4%) developed recurrent CDI. When 42 cases were matched to 79 control subjects, antibiotic exposure within 90 days was significantly associated with CDI (adjusted odds ratio 5.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-17.74; p = 0.002). Moreover, CDI was associated with 1 year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-5.82; p = 0.018). This infection occurs most often within the first year after LVAD implantation and was associated with 1 year mortality. Antibiotic exposure is an important risk for CDI.

Dynamics of bacterial pathogens at the driveline exit site in patients with ventricular assist devices: A prospective, observational, single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Driveline infections (DLIs) at the exit site are frequent in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The dynamics from colonization to infection are yet to be investigated. We combined systematic swabbing at the driveline exit site and genomic analyses to study the dynamics of bacterial pathogens and get insights into DLIs pathogenesis.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, single-center cohort study at the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland was performed. Patients with LVAD were systematically swabbed at the driveline exit site between June 2019 and December 2021, irrespective of signs and symptoms of DLI. Bacterial isolates were identified and a subset was whole-genome sequenced.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were screened, of which 45 (84.9%) were included in the final population. Bacterial colonization at the driveline exit site without manifestation of DLI was frequent and observed in 17 patients (37.8%). Twenty-two patients (48.9%) developed at least one DLI episode over the study period. Incidence of DLIs reached 2.3 cases per 1000 LVAD days. The majority of the organisms cultivated from exit sites were Staphylococcus species. Genome analysis revealed that bacteria persisted at the driveline exit site over time. In four patients, transition from colonization to clinical DLI was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to address bacterial colonization in the LVAD-DLI setting. We observed that bacterial colonization at the driveline exit site was a frequent phenomenon, and in a few cases, it preceded clinically relevant infections. We also provided acquisition of hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant bacteria and the transmission of pathogens between patients.

Hemoadsorption in LVAD Surgery: Suitable in Theory?

The incidence of patients with heart failure is growing steadily, particularly due to advancements in medical therapy [...].

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy is not effective for preventing driveline infection following left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Driveline infection (DLI) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains an unresolved problem. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes wound healing by applying negative pressure on the surface of the wound. Recently, the prophylactic application of NPWT to closed surgical incisions has decreased surgical site infections in various postsurgical settings. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic NPWT for preventing DLI in patients with LVAD implantation.

METHODS

Prophylactic NPWT was provided to 50 patients who received continuous-flow LVADs as bridge-to-transplant therapy at our institution between May 2018 and October 2020 (NPWT group). The negative pressure dressing was applied immediately after surgery and retained on the driveline exit site for 7 days with a continuous application of -125 mm Hg negative pressure. The primary outcome was DLI within 1 year of LVAD implantation. We compared the rate of DLI incidence in the NPWT group with that in the historical control cohort (50 patients) treated with the standard dressing (SD) who received LVAD implantation between July 2015 and April 2018 (SD group).

RESULTS

No severe complications were associated with the NPWT. During the follow-up period, DLI was diagnosed in 16 participants (32%) in the NPWT group and 21 participants (42%) in the SD group. The rates of DLI incidence and freedom from DLI did not differ between groups (p = 0.30 and p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic NPWT at the driveline exit site was safe following LVAD implantation. However, it did not significantly reduce the risk of DLI.

Impact of an improved driveline management for HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of a standardized driveline care strategy, including a subfascial-tunneling method and dressing protocol, on the incidence of driveline infection (DLI).

METHODS

DLI data from all HeartMate II (HMII) and HeartMate 3 (HM3) patients (including exchange devices) were retrospectively collected between 2013 and 2021. The driveline subfascial-tunneling method was altered in three steps (A: right direct; B: left triple, C: right triple), and the shower protocol was changed in two steps (A: with/without cover, B: with cover). Disinfection was individually tailored after changing the shower protocol. Complications associated with morbidity and mortality were evaluated for each modification.

RESULTS

During the study period, 80 devices were implanted (HMII, n = 54; HM3, n = 26). The 8-year incidence of DLI was 15% (n = 8) in HMII patients and 0% in HM3 patients (p = 0.039). DLI was not associated with hospital mortality. The modified dressing protocol and tunneling method was associated with a significantly better DLI incidence rate in comparison to the previous one: Protocol-A (n = 17), Protocol-B (n = 63), 35% vs 3% (p = 0.0009), Method-A (n = 13), Method-B (n = 42), Method-C (n = 25), 46% vs 5% vs 0% (p = 0.0001). The rete of freedom form DLI at 1, 2, and 3 years had also significant difference between groups: Protocol-A and Protocol-B, 80%, 54%, 54% vs 96%, 96%, 96%, respectively (p < 0.0001), Method-A, Method-B and Method-C, 76%, 44%, 44%, vs 94%, 94%, 94% vs 100%, 100%, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized triple driveline tunneling strategy and waterproof dressing protocol reduced driveline infection in HM3 patients to 0%.

Six years of continuous mechanical circulatory support following chronic graft failure

Re-transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with chronic heart transplant failure. If re-transplantation is not a viable option due to the patient's comorbidities, left ventricle assist device can be used as the destination treatment. An interdisciplinary approach with thorough follow-up can help in the early detection and treatment of complications associated with LVAD.

Driveline Infection in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: Effect of Standardized Protocols, Pathogen Type, and Treatment Strategy

Driveline infection (DLI) is common after left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Limited data exist on DLI prevention and management. We investigated the impact of standardized driveline care initiatives, specific pathogens, and chronic antibiotic suppression (CAS) on DLI outcomes. 591 LVAD patients were retrospectively categorized based on driveline care initiatives implemented at our institution (2009-2019). Era (E)1: nonstandardized care; E2: standardized driveline care protocol; E3: addition of marking driveline exit site; E4: addition of "no shower" policy. 87(15%) patients developed DLI at a median (IQR) of 403(520) days. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were the most common pathogens. 31 (36%) of DLI patients required incision and drainage (I&D) and 5 (5.7%) device exchange. P. aeruginosa significantly increased risk for initial I&D (HR 2.7, 95% CI, 1.1-6.3) and recurrent I&D or death (HR 4.2, 95% CI, 1.4-12.5). Initial I&D was associated with a significant increased risk of death (HR 2.92 (1.33-6.44); P = 0.008) when compared to patients who did not develop DLI. Implementation of standardized driveline care protocol (E2) was associated with increased 2-year freedom from DLI compared to nonstandardized care (HR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.2-0.6, P < 0.01). Additional preventive strategies (E3&E4) showed no further reduction in DLI rates. 57(65%) DLI patients received CAS, 44% of them required escalation to intravenous antibiotics and/or I&D. Presence of P. aeruginosa DLI markedly increased risk for I&D or death. Conditional survival of patients progressing to I&D is diminished. Standardized driveline care protocol was associated with a significant reduction in DLI, while additional preventive strategies require further testing.

Selection and management considerations to enhance outcomes in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are life-saving therapies for patients in end-stage heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction regardless of candidacy for heart transplantation. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated improved morbidity and mortality with LVADs when compared to medical therapy alone. However, the uptake of LVADs as a therapeutic option in a larger section of end-stage HF patients remains limited, partly due to associated adverse events and re-hospitalization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accurate assessment and staging of HF patients is crucial to guide appropriate use of LVADs. Innovative methods to risk stratify patients and manage cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities can translate to improved outcomes in LVAD recipients. Inclusion of quality of life metrics and measurements of adverse events can better inform heart failure cardiologists to help identify ideal LVAD candidates. Addition of machine learning algorithms to this process may guide patient selection to improve outcomes.

SUMMARY

Patient selection and assessment of reversible medical comorbidities are critical to the postoperative success of LVAD implantation. Identifying patients most likely to benefit and least likely to experience adverse events should be a priority.

Does infection predispose to thrombosis during long term ventricular assist device support?

BACKGROUND

Infections and thrombotic events remain life-threatening complications in patients with ventricular assist devices (VAD).

METHODS

We describe the relationship between both events in our cohort of patients (n=220) supported with the HeartWare VAD (HVAD). This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing HVAD implantation between July 2009 and March 2019 at the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

RESULTS

Infection was the most common adverse event in HVAD patients, with 125 patients (56.8%) experiencing ≥ one infection (n=168, 0.33 event-per-person-year-EPPY), followed by pump thrombosis (PT) in 61 patients (27.7%, 0.16 EPPY). VAD-specific infections were the largest group of infections. Of the 125 patients who had an infection, 66 (53%) had a thrombotic event. Both thrombotic events and infections were related to the duration of support, though there was only limited evidence that infections predispose to thrombosis. Those with higher than median levels of CRP during the infection were more likely to have an ischaemic stroke (IS) (34.5% vs 16.7%, p=0.03), though not PT or a combined thrombotic event (CTE: first PT or IS). However, in multivariate analysis there was no significant effect of infection predisposing to CTE.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection and thrombotic events are significant adverse events related to the duration of support in patients receiving HVADs. Infections do not clearly predispose to thrombotic events.

Intracranial Mycotic Aneurysm after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Treated with Trans-arterial Embolization via the Brachial Artery: A Case Report

Implantation of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is widely performed in patients with end-stage chronic heart failure. Infection and stroke are major complications after LVAD implantation. However, the incidence of intracranial mycotic aneurysm after LVAD implantation is rare, and with no standard of care. In this study, we describe a case of an intracranial mycotic aneurysm after LVAD implantation that was successfully treated with trans-arterial embolization (TAE) with N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) via the brachial artery. A 49-year-old man with a history of implantation of LVAD for ischemic cardiomyopathy was admitted to our institution. He had infectious endocarditis and was administered systemic antibiotics. At 3 weeks after admission, intracranial mycotic aneurysm of the left posterior parietal artery was detected during a diagnostic examination for asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Anticoagulant therapy was administered to prevent thromboembolic complications of LVAD implantation. Under local anesthesia, TAE with NBCA was performed via the brachial artery because of the tortuous anatomy of the origin of the innominate artery and implant of the aortic arch. The aneurysm was completely obliterated. The patient was discharged without neurological deficits. TAE using NBCA could be an effective modality for the treatment of intracranial mycotic aneurysm after LVAD implantation.

Clinical considerations for the evaluation of patients with left ventricular assist devices

ABSTRACT

A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) provides mechanical circulatory support for patients with end-stage heart failure. As these devices become more prevalent, clinicians must be familiar with the device's function, common complications, and management strategies when evaluating this patient population.

Colonization with Multidrug-resistant Organisms in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices

Infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ventricular assist devices (VAD). The impact of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) on outcomes in this cohort is unknown. Patients on VAD support from July 2008 to September 2018 at a single site were evaluated for MDRO colonization after implantation. MDROs included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing gram-negative bacteria. 378 patients with 433 VADs were included. 42.6% (n = 161) of patients were colonized with an MDRO throughout the duration of VAD support. Eighty-two VAD infections occurred, 74.4% (n = 61) of whom were MDRO colonized before infection. MDRO colonization was associated with an increased risk of a subsequent VAD infection (hazard ratio 3.704, p < 0.001). MDRO colonization is common after VAD implantation and is associated with future VAD infections. Further study is needed to determine best management strategies for VAD recipients with MDRO colonization given this increased risk.

Impact of Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections on Post-Heart Transplant Infections: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD) who are awaiting heart transplant (HTx) are susceptible to infections. Such infections, especially at the site of the VAD, may increase the risk of severe post-transplant infections and mortality. Information on the characteristics of VAD-specific infections and outcomes in HTx recipients after prolonged periods of LVAD therapy is scarce.

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the impact of active VAD-specific infections on the incidence of early post-transplant infections and patient survival.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of adult HTx cases at our center between April 2011 and October 2020. Informed consent was waived due to study design. A total of 86 patients were included in this study, among whom 94.2% (n = 81) were bridged with a VAD, and the median VAD support period was 1089 days.

RESULTS

Patients with active VAD-specific infections were significantly more likely to develop severe acute mediastinitis [odds ratio (OR) 14.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.83-45.4, P < .01]. Active VAD infections were significantly related to increased length of intensive care unit stay (22.1 days vs 13.0 days, P = .016) and longer mechanical ventilation periods (324.7 hours vs 113.2 hours, P = .03). The 30-day survival rates for patients with and without post-transplant infections were 100% and 97.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared to other risk factors, the presence of active VAD-specific infections increases the risk of early post-heart transplant infections and morbidity, without affecting mortality.

Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Infections are the most common complication in recipients of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and expenditures. The existing literature examining factors associated with infection in LVAD recipients is limited and principally comprises single-center studies. This scoping review synthesizes all available evidence related to identifying modifiable, non-patient factors associated with infections among LVAD recipients.

METHODS

Published studies were identified through searching 5 bibliographic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection. Inclusion criteria required examination of factors associated with infections among recipients of contemporary, implantable, continuous flow LVADs. Key study characteristics were extracted by 4 independent reviewers and current literature described narratively. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model was used to develop a taxonomy for non-patient related factors (e.g., tasks, tools, technologies, organization, and environment) associated with infections following LVAD implantation. All analyses took place between February 2019 and May 2021.

FINDINGS

A total of 43 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of included studies were observational (n = 37), single-center (n = 29), from the U.S. (n = 38), and focused on driveline infections (n = 40). Among the 22 evaluated sub-domains of non-patient related factors, only two: increasing center experience and establishing a silicone-skin interface at the driveline exit site, were identified as consistently being associated with a lower risk of infection.

CONCLUSION

This review identified 43 studies that described non-patient related factors associated with infection in LVAD recipients. Only two factors were consistently associated with lower infection risk in LVAD recipients: increasing experience and establishing a silicone-skin interface at driveline exit site. The large variability in reporting across multiple studied interventions limited the ability to discern their effectiveness.

Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections: A Systematic Review

Infection is the most common complication in patients undergoing ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Driveline exit site (DLES) infection is the most frequent VAD infection and is a significant cause of adverse events in VAD patients, contributing to morbidity, even mortality, and repetitive hospital readmissions. There are many risk factors for driveline infection (DLI) including younger age, smaller constitution of patients, obesity, exposed velour at the DLES, longer duration of device support, lower cardiac index, higher heart failure score, DLES trauma, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and depression. The incidence of DLI depends also on the device type. Numerous measures to prevent DLI currently exist. Some of them are proven, whereas the others remain controversial. Current recommendations on DLES care and DLI management are predominantly based on expert consensus and clinical experience of the certain centers. However, careful and uniform DLES care including obligatory driveline immobilization, previously prepared sterile dressing change kits, and continuous patient education are probably crucial for prevention of DLI. Diagnosis and treatment of DLI are often challenging because of certain immunological alterations in VAD patients and microbial biofilm formation on the driveline surface areas. Although there are many conservative and surgical methods described in the DLI treatment, the only possible permanent solution for DLI resolution in VAD patients is heart transplantation. This systematic review brings a comprehensive synthesis of recent data on the prevention, diagnostic workup, and conservative and surgical management of DLI in VAD patients.

Imaging of Cardiac Device-Related Infection

Cardiac devices are frequently used in different cardiovascular conditions for the purpose of morbidity or mortality prevention. These include cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) like permanent pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators, ventricular assistance devices (VADs), left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices like the Watchman™, atrial and ventricular septal occluders like the Amplatzer™, among others. In the past years, there has been an increase in the development of these devices as a result of a rise in the number of indications for implantation, paired with the aging and more medically complex patient population. This has led to an increase in the incidence of cardiac device-related infections, one of the most feared and serious complications which is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and financial burden. Accurate diagnosis of cardiac device-related infections is essential given the management implications which often involve removal of the infected device, removal of other prosthetic material and long-term antimicrobial therapy. Clinical and laboratory data are useful diagnostic tools but multimodality imaging is often necessary. The recently published 2020 European Heart Rhythm Association International Consensus document, which is endorsed by many expert societies, has recommended the use of multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of CIED infections. (1) This allows better disease characterization by identifying abnormal fluid collections and guiding aspiration for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes (i.e. soft tissue ultrasound and computed tomography), evaluation for local extent of disease (i.e. transesophageal echocardiogram to evaluate for concomitant infective endocarditis), embolic manifestation of disease (i.e. computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) and metabolic tissue characterization (positron emission tomography and tagged white blood cell scan). (2) In addition, computed tomography (CT) allows for pre-procedural planning which has shown to be associated with better procedural outcomes.

Outcomes Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Exchange: Focus on the Impacts of Device Infection

Hemodynamic support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy has proven a reliable treatment for advanced heart failure. Although modern LVADs are highly durable, device failure and infection can be resolved with surgical exchange of pump components. In this study, we investigated the incidence and outcomes of LVAD exchange with the HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD. Data were obtained from 677 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between 2005 and 2016. Patients who underwent a device exchanged were included. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and mortality. Of the 677 patients included in this study, 72 (10.6%) required LVAD exchange. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality rates were comparable to primary LVAD implantation: 4.3% vs. 3.49%, p = 0.727 and 20.3% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.989, respectively. Thirty-one patients (4.5%) underwent exchange with ongoing infection. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated significant differences in survival between groups based on indication for exchange. Patients who underwent exchange after more than 150 days of active infection suffered worse postexchange survival than those who underwent exchanged earlier (P = 0.007). While exchange was required only in 10.6% of patients undergoing LVAD implantation, our results show device exchange may be executed safely and effectively, with long-term outcomes similar to primary LVAD implantation. The indication for device exchange impacts postexchange outcomes, and those exchanged with LVAD infection tend to fare worse than those exchanged for device malfunction or thrombus. Patients who are exchanged with active infection have better postoperative survival if the exchange is performed expeditiously after medical management has failed.

The outcome of patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and consecutive implantation of a left ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVES

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a form of systolic heart failure occurring toward the end of pregnancy or in the period after delivery. Lack of myocardial recovery or therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock are rare complications and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) systems might be used as a life-saving option. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of PPCM patients supported with LVAD, registered in the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS).

METHODS

All patients registered in EUROMACS with a primary diagnosis of PPCM were included in this study. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected and patients analysed concerning their outcome after initiation of LVAD therapy.

RESULTS

Between May 2011 and September 2018, 16 patients with PPCM and consecutive LVAD implantation were enrolled into EUROMACS. The median age of the patient population was 31 (26;41) years with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) of 15% ± 6%. In-hospital mortality after LVAD implantation was 6% (n = 1). One-year mortality accounted for 13% (n = 2). Six patients (40%) were transplanted with a median support time of 769 (193;1529) days. Weaning of LVAD support due to ventricular recovery was feasible in 3 (20%) patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe PPCM, LVAD therapy is associated with considerably low in-hospital mortality, potentially allowing bridging to heart transplantation, or left ventricular recovery. Therefore, durable mechanical support should be considered as a treatment option in this, by nature, young and often otherwise healthy patient population.

5-year results of a newly implemented mechanical circulatory support program for terminal heart failure patients in a Swiss non-cardiac transplant university hospital

Background

In Switzerland, long-term circulatory support programs have been limited to heart transplant centers. In 2014, to improve the management of patients with end-stage heart failure not eligible for transplantation, we implemented a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) program for destination therapy at the University Hospital of Basel.

Methods

We described the program set-up with practical aspects. Patients aged 65 and above with therapy refractory end-stage heart failure without major contraindication for LVAD implantation were included. Younger patients with bridge-to-candidacy profile were also considered. Using the Kaplan-Meier estimate, we retrospectively analyzed the overall survival and freedom from major adverse events after LVAD implantation. We compared our results to internationally reported data.

Results

Between October 2014 and September 2019, 16 patients received an LVAD in our center. The mean age at implantation was 67.1 years. The mean EuroSCORE II was 24.4% and the median INTERMACS level was 4. Thirteen patients received an LVAD as destination therapy and three patients as bridge-to-candidacy. The overall survival was 87.5 and 70% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from stroke was 81.3% at 1 and 2 years. Freedom from device infection was 67.7 and 58.7% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from gastrointestinal bleeding was 75 and 56.3% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from readmission was 50 and 31.3% and at 6 months and 1 year, respectively.

Conclusions

The Basel experience demonstrated the possible implementation of an LVAD program for destination therapy or bridge-to-candidacy in a non-transplant comprehensive heart-failure center with midterm survival results and freedom from major adverse events comparable to international registries. Patient selection remains crucial.

Trial registration

This study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT04263012).

Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review

Background

End stage heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and its prevalence is expected to rise with the ageing population. For suitable patients, orthotopic heart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy, however, a paucity of donor organs has led to the development of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). These devices can be utilized as either a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or as an alternative to heart transplantation. While these devices can prolong life and improve quality of life, they are associated with a significant number of adverse events. We aim to systematically review the literature to quantify survival and the incidence of adverse events following implantation of continuous-flow LVADs (cf-LVAD).

Methods

A systematic review was performed to determine outcomes following implantation of a cf-LVAD. Primary outcomes were survival and frequency of adverse events (such as bleeding, infection, thrombosis, stroke and right ventricular failure). Secondary outcomes included quality of life and assessment of functional status.

Results

Sixty-three studies reported clinical outcomes of 9,280 patients. Survival after cf-LVAD varied between studies. Industry-funded trials generally reported better overall survival than the single- and multi-center case series, which showed significant variation. The largest registry report documented twelve, twenty-four and forty-eight-month survival rates of 82%, 72% and 57% respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events were gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), device-related infection, neurological events and right heart failure (RHF). Bleeding, RHF and infection were the most frequent complications experienced by those supported with cf-LVAD, occurring in up to 35%, 40% and 55% of patients, respectively. Quality of life as measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and functional status as measured with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) improved after cf-LVAD implantation with no decline evident two years after implantation.

Conclusions

The paucity of donor hearts has led to the development of left-ventricular assist devices as a BTT or as a destination therapy (DT). Outcomes after cf-LVAD implantation are excellent, with short-term survival comparable to heart transplantation, but long-term survival remains limited due to the incidence of post-implantation adverse events. Despite these complications, quality of life and functional status improve significantly post-implantation and remain improved over the long-term. This study demonstrates the potential benefits of cf-LVAD therapy whilst also identifying adverse events as an area of increased morbidity and mortality.

Epidemiology of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: Findings From a Large Nonregistry Cohort

BACKGROUND

Infection is a major complication during circulatory support with a left ventricular assist device (VAD). Changes in device characteristics and treatment practices in the last decade can affect the epidemiology of infection. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has published recommendations on the prevention and management of VAD infections, but data to support these recommendations remain sparse.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 455 patients who underwent VAD placement from 2009 to 2015. Infection episodes were defined using ISHLT criteria and were also grouped as endovascular or local. Analysis included descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

There were 174 patients (38.6%) with a VAD infection. Infection incidence was 36.9 cases per 100 person-years of VAD support. The driveline was the most common infection site (67.2%). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were not satisfied in 29.2% of patients with endovascular infections, and computed tomography (CT) examinations were normal in 37.7% of cases. Gram-positive bacteria caused 65.6% of infections in patients with an available culture. Antimicrobial suppression was used in 72.3% of patients who survived treatment. Median survival after infection was 35 months for patients with VAD-related infections versus 14 months for patients with VAD-specific infections.

CONCLUSIONS

VAD infections continue to be a major complication after implantation. Clinical criteria alone were not predictive of serious infections, and many patients with confirmed infection had normal CTs. Patients with VAD-specific infections had lower median survival than patients with VAD-related infections.

Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections

Ventricular assist device (VAD)-specific infections, in particular, driveline infections, are a concerning complication of VAD implantation that often results in significant morbidity and even mortality. The presence of a percutaneous driveline at the skin exit-site and in the subcutaneous tunnel allows biofilm formation and migration by many bacterial and fungal pathogens. Biofilm formation is an important microbial strategy, providing a shield against antimicrobial treatment and human immune responses; biofilm migration facilitates the extension of infection to deeper tissues such as the pump pocket and the bloodstream. Despite the introduction of multiple preventative strategies, driveline infections still occur with a high prevalence of ~10-20% per year and their treatment outcomes are frequently unsatisfactory. Clinical diagnosis, prevention and management of driveline infections are being targeted to specific microbial pathogens grown as biofilms at the driveline exit-site or in the driveline tunnel. The purpose of this review is to improve the understanding of VAD-specific infections, from basic "bench" knowledge to clinical "bedside" experience, with a specific focus on the role of biofilms in driveline infections.

Early sST2 Liberation after Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure

Background

The use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has increased considerably over the past decade; however, there is limited literature to assist in patient selection and monitoring. The frequency of adverse events remains high. We examined the early expression of circulating soluble ST2 (sST2), a biomarker with immunosuppressive and profibrotic activity, and assessed the risk of death at 1 year in patients receiving LVAD implant.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 20 heart failure patients and measured sST2, IL-33, and IL-6 serum concentrations over three weeks after LVAD implantation. We compared the kinetics of IL-6, sST2, and IL-33 release in survivors with those of nonsurvivors using mixed model two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures. We also collected data on hemodynamic parameters (i.e., cardiac output) and frequency of infections during the hospital stay.

Results

LVAD therapy led to an immediate and significant improvement of the hemodynamic parameters in 1-year survivors and nonsurvivors alike. The 1-year survival rate was 65%. IL-6 concentrations showed a significant (p = 0.03) peak at admission to the intensive care unit following LVAD implantation, whereas sST2 levels were massively increased (p < 0.0003) on day 1. While 1-year survivors had persistently lower sST2 values compared to nonsurvivors during the first 3 weeks after LVAD implantation (p = 0.012), no differences were observed in the temporal pattern of IL-6 or IL-33. The odds of detecting Candida species in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were 14 times higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (OR 13.7, CI 1.4-127, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

In patients implanted with LVAD, circulating sST2 levels and frequency of Candida colonisation were associated with higher mortality. Awareness of this early immune response can guide physicians in risk-benefit analysis.

HFSA/SAEM/ISHLT clinical expert consensus document on the emergency management of patients with ventricular assist devices

Mechanical circulatory support is now widely accepted as a viable long-term treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). As the range of indications for the implantation of ventricular assist devices grows, so does the number of patients living in the community with durable support. Because of their underlying disease and comorbidities, in addition to the presence of mechanical support, these patients are at a high risk for medical urgencies and emergencies (Table 1). Thus, it is the responsibility of clinicians to understand the basics of their emergency care. This consensus document represents a collaborative effort by the Heart Failure Society of America, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) to educate practicing clinicians about the emergency management of patients with ventricular assist devices. The target audience includes HF specialists and emergency medicine physicians, as well as general cardiologists and community-based providers.

Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices

Driveline infections (DLI) are common adverse events in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), leading to severe complications and readmissions. The study aims to characterize risk factors for DLI readmission 2 years postimplant. This single‐center study included 183 LVAD patients (43 HeartMate II [HMII], 29 HeartMate 3 [HM3], 111 HVAD) following hospital discharge between 2013 and 2017. Demographics, clinical parameters, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed and 12.6% of patients were readmitted for DLI, 14.8% experienced DLI but were treated in the outpatient setting, and 72.7% had no DLI. Mean C‐reactive protein (CRP), leukocytes and fibrinogen were higher in patients with DLI readmission (P < .02) than in outpatient DLI and patients without DLI, as early as 60 days before readmission. Freedom from DLI readmission was comparable for HMII and HVAD (98% vs. 87%; HR, 4.52; 95% CI, 0.58‐35.02; P = .15) but significantly lower for HM3 (72%; HR, 10.82; 95% CI, 1.26‐92.68; P = .03). DLI (HR, 1.001; 95% CI, 0.999‐1.002; P = .16) or device type had no effect on mortality. DLI readmission remains a serious problem following LVAD implantation, where CRP, leukocytes, and fibrinogen might serve as risk factors already 60 days before. HM3 patients had a higher risk for DLI readmissions compared to HVAD or HMII, possibly because of device‐specific driveline differences.

Metal-induced bacterial interactions promote diversity in river-sediment microbiomes

Anthropogenic metal contamination results in long-term environmental selective pressure with unclear impacts on bacterial communities, which comprise key players in ecosystem functioning. Since metal contamination poses serious toxicity and bioaccumulation issues, assessing their impact on environmental microbiomes is important to respond to current environmental and health issues. Despite elevated metal concentrations, the river sedimentary microbiome near the MetalEurop foundry (France) shows unexpected higher diversity compared with the upstream control site. In this work, a follow-up of the microbial community assembly during a metal contamination event was performed in microcosms with periodic renewal of the supernatant river water. Sediments of the control site were gradually exposed to a mixture of metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in order to reach similar concentrations to MetalEurop sediments. Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons was performed. Metal-resistant genes, czcA and pbrA, as well as IncP plasmid content, were assessed by quantitative PCR. The outcomes of this study support previous in situ observations showing that metals act as community assembly managers, increasing diversity. This work revealed progressive adaptation of the sediment microbiome through the selection of different metal-resistant mechanisms and cross-species interactions involving public good-providing bacteria co-occurring with the rest of the community.

Deep Natural Language Processing to Identify Symptom Documentation in Clinical Notes for Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

CONTEXT

Clinicians lack reliable methods to predict which patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Symptom burden may help to predict response, but this information is buried in free-text clinical notes. Natural language processing (NLP) may identify symptoms recorded in the electronic health record and thereby enable this information to inform clinical decisions about the appropriateness of CRT.

OBJECTIVES

To develop, train, and test a deep NLP model that identifies documented symptoms in patients with CHF receiving CRT.

METHODS

We identified a random sample of clinical notes from a cohort of patients with CHF who later received CRT. Investigators labeled documented symptoms as present, absent, and context dependent (pathologic depending on the clinical situation). The algorithm was trained on 80% and fine-tuned parameters on 10% of the notes. We tested the model on the remaining 10%. We compared the model's performance to investigators' annotations using accuracy, precision (positive predictive value), recall (sensitivity), and F1 score (a combined measure of precision and recall).

RESULTS

Investigators annotated 154 notes (352,157 words) and identified 1340 present, 1300 absent, and 221 context-dependent symptoms. In the test set of 15 notes (35,467 words), the model's accuracy was 99.4% and recall was 66.8%. Precision was 77.6%, and overall F1 score was 71.8. F1 scores for present (70.8) and absent (74.7) symptoms were higher than that for context-dependent symptoms (48.3).

CONCLUSION

A deep NLP algorithm can be trained to capture symptoms in patients with CHF who received CRT with promising precision and recall.

Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy: a State of the Science and Art of Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to synthesize and summarize recent developments in the care of patients with end-stage heart failure being managed with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the survival of patients treated with LVAD continues to improve, the rates of LVAD-associated complication, such as right ventricular failure, bleeding complications, and major infection, remain high, and management of these patients remains challenging. The durability and hemocompatibility of LVAD support have greatly increased in recent years as a result of new technologies and novel management strategies. Challenges remain in the comprehensive care of patients with destination therapy LVADs, including management of comorbidities and optimizing patient function and quality of life.

Pedicle flap coverage for infected ventricular assist device augmented with dissolving antibiotic beads: Creation of an antibacterial pocket

Infectious complications following left ventricular assist device implantation can carry significant morbidity and mortality. The main tenet of treatment is source control which entails local wound care, intravenous antimicrobial therapy, surgical debridement, and at times, soft tissue flap coverage. The mode of therapy depends on the severity, etiology, and location of infection as well as the clinical status of the patient. We describe a case of a 46-year-old male who underwent left ventricular assist device placement complicated by pump thrombosis, recurrent infection, and hardware exposure who was successfully treated with a novel method of staged, soft tissue reconstruction.

Pseudoaneurysm rupture presenting as bleeding from the cannulation site in a paediatric patient with dilated cardiomyopathy and congenital skin lesions requiring EXCOR® Paediatric ventricular assist device: a case report

Background

EXCOR^® Paediatric is used worldwide as a bridge-to-transplant treatment. It provides improved patient stability during the waiting period compared with previous ventricular assist device (VAD). However, investigations into complications which may occur among the paediatric population during long waiting periods are still sparse.

Case summary

We describe the case of a 7-year-old girl who presented with severe heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy. She also had a skin lesion which appeared soon after birth. She had received an EXCOR^® implant and was waiting for heart transplant. Her skin lesion worsened after implantation and she suffered recurrent infections. Multiple bleeding episodes from the cannulation site occurred; therefore, surgical exploration of the bleeding was performed. She passed away during the procedure due to massive bleeding caused by rupture of a pseudoaneurysm caused by blood-stream infection.

Discussion

Patients with skin disease may be at increased risk of infection when on a VAD. Infections that occur during VAD therapy may cause serious complications such as pseudoaneurysm. The possibility of pseudoaneurysm should be considered when bleeding occurs in a patient on VAD.

Opportune Time of Tooth Extraction in Individuals Requiring Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Individuals with implantable ventricular assist devices (VADs) are at extremely high risk of bleeding, thromboembolism, and infection after undergoing invasive dental procedures. This study aimed to investigate the systemic and local complications of tooth extraction before and after VAD implantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center. Oral surgical procedures were performed in patients before and/or after left VAD implantation for bridge-to-heart transplantation between April 2013 and December 2017. In this study, the medical charts of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. Data about pre-extraction complete blood count, coagulation profile, biochemical profile, and incidence of local and systemic complications were compared in patients undergoing tooth extraction before VAD implantation (b-VAD group) versus after VAD implantation (a-VAD group).

RESULTS

In total, 28 inpatients underwent 36 oral surgical procedures before and/or after VAD implantation. Moreover, 24 tooth extractions were performed in the b-VAD group, and 12 were performed in the a-VAD group. The incidence of post-extraction bleeding was higher in the a-VAD group (P = .001, Mann-Whitney U test), and a significant difference was observed in terms of activated partial thromboplastin time (P = .010, Mann-Whitney U test). Systemic complications associated with VADs included cerebral infarction (n = 2) and driveline infection (n = 1). Post-extraction bleeding was observed within 90 days after VAD implantation in all patients who underwent tooth extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of bleeding after tooth extraction was higher in the a-VAD group (67%) than in the b-VAD group (13%). In 3 cases, VAD-related systemic complications developed within a short period after tooth extraction. The extraction management in the b-VAD group could be controlled without causing any problem. Hence, the opportune time of tooth extraction is before VAD implantation.

In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era

With the rising prevalence of heart disease in the United States, there is increasing reliance on durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to treat patients with end-stage heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), the most common form of durable MCS, are implanted mechanical pumps that connect to an external power source through a transcutaneous driveline. First-generation LVADs were bulky, pulsatile pumps that were frequently complicated by infection. Second-generation LVADs have an improved design, though infection remains a common and serious complication due to the inherent nature of implanted MCS. Infections can affect any component of the LVAD, with driveline infections being the most common. LVAD infections carry significant morbidity and mortality for LVAD patients. Therefore, it is paramount for the multidisciplinary team of clinicians caring for these patients to be familiar with this complication. We review the epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of LVAD infections.

Nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus is a risk factor for ventricular assist device infection in the first year after implantation: A prospective, single-centre, cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To assess, whether S. aureus nasal colonization is a risk factor for infections in patients with durable ventricular assist device (VAD).

METHODS

Prospective, single-centre, cohort study (i) ascertaining S. aureus nasal colonization status of patients admitted for VAD-implantation and detecting time to first episode of VAD-specific or -related infection according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria during follow-up and (ii) comparing whole genomes of S. aureus from baseline colonization and later infection.

RESULTS

Among 49 patients (17 colonized, 32 non-colonized), S. aureus VAD-infections occurred with long latency after implantation (inter quartile range 76-217 days), but occurred earlier (log-rank test P = 0.006) and were more common (9/17, 52.9% vs. 4/32, 12.5%, P = 0.005; incidence rates 2.81 vs. 0.61/1000 patient days; incidence rate ratio 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.30-20.65, P = 0.009) among those nasally colonized with S. aureus before implantation. We found a similar but less pronounced effect of colonization status when analysing its effect on all types of VAD-infections (10/17, 58.8% vs. 7/32, 21.9%, P = 0.01). These findings remained robust when adjusting for potential confounders and restricting the analysis to 'proven infections'. 75% (6/8) of paired S. aureus samples from colonization and VAD-infection showed concordant whole genomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with durable VAD, S. aureus nasal colonization is a source of endogenous infection, often occurring months after device-implantation and affecting mostly the driveline. Hygiene measures interrupting the endogenous route of transmission in VAD-patients colonized with S. aureus long-term may about half the burden of infections and require clinical scrutiny.

Minimum inhibitory concentration changes in relapsed left ventricular assist device driveline infections

Driveline infection is the most common infectious complication in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes are not well described in relapsed driveline infections. This retrospective descriptive epidemiology study of patients with left ventricular assist device implantation between January 1, 2013, and August 1, 2017, who developed driveline infection with positive cultures aimed to describe minimum inhibitory concentration changes. Of the 330 patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, 30 (9%) met criteria for driveline infection. Median duration of follow-up was 26 months (interquartile range 16, 39) and time to first driveline infection was 171 days (interquartile range 83, 403). There were 74 driveline infections: 40 new and 34 relapsed. Staphylococcus aureus was most common in new and relapsed driveline infection. Thirteen patients comprised the 34 relapsed infections, 9 of which experienced a minimum inhibitory concentration change. Median time to first minimum inhibitory concentration change was 56 days (interquartile range 36-88), and type of minimum inhibitory concentration change was an increase in five cases, decrease in two cases, and both increase and decrease in two cases. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes did not result in resistance in S. aureus but did in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mycobacterium fortuitum relapsed driveline infection. Time to first relapse from initial infection was longer in those who received suppressive therapy, 60 days versus 83 days, p = 0.047. Relapsed driveline infections were most common with S. aureus. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes were quite variable and may not be the major contributor to relapsed infection in gram-positive driveline infection.