Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy for small-sized stage IA lung cancer

Assessing Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Tumors up to Two Centimeters in Diameter in Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Lung cancer, which accounted for 1.8 million fatalities in 2020, necessitates the investigation of optimal surgical approaches for early-stage cases. Although lobectomy has long been associated with successful results, the growing interest in segmentectomy as an alternative procedure warrants further examination. The primary objective of this study was to compare segmentectomy with lobectomy as a viable treatment option for early-stage lung cancer. Our systematic review of NSCLC studies comparing lobectomy to segmentectomy followed the PRISMA guidelines and used a random-effects model. We extracted the patient characteristics, outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included hazard ratios, risk ratios, sensitivity assessments, and bias evaluations, all of which were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among studies. Twelve studies involving 6049 patients revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS), with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, p = 0.90). At 24 and 60 months, OS rates were RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, p = 0.0001) and RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, p = 0.03), respectively. Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) results were comparable (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19, p = 0.87). DFS at 24 and 60 months demonstrated RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, p = 0.05) and RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, p = 0.02), respectively. The risk of lung cancer recurrence was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30, p = 0.26). Our study revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy had identical oncological outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. Although segmentectomy showed a slightly higher complication rate, further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the importance of additional randomized trials.

Compensatory function change by segment-counting method in predicted postoperative pulmonary function at 1 year after surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to assess the accuracy of the segment-counting method in predicting long-term pulmonary function recovery and investigate compensatory changes following different extents of lung resection.

METHODS

We included studies that measured forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) between 6 and 18 months postoperatively, comparing it to the predicted postoperative FEV1 (ppoFEV1) using the segment-counting method. The extent of lung resection was correlated with the ratio of postoperative FEV1 to ppoFEV1. A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and Web of Science using terms related to 'lung resection' and 'pulmonary function'. The final search was completed on 18 February 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

39 studies comprising 78 observation cohorts met the inclusion criteria. The analysis showed significant differences in pulmonary function in patients with ≥3 resected segments. Meta-regression indicated that the number of resected segments significantly impacted the postoperative FEV1/ppoFEV1 ratio, explaining 57% of the variance (R²=0. 57), with moderate heterogeneity (I²=61. 87%) across studies. Other variables, including patient age, body mass index, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery use and tumour stage, did not show significant effects.

DISCUSSION

Limitations of the review included moderate heterogeneity between studies and potential selection bias related to the stage of cancer and lung volume reduction effects. The findings suggest that the extent of lung resection correlates with better-than-expected pulmonary function, potentially due to compensatory mechanisms.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021293608).

Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and survival outcomes

While recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have suggested superior overall survival (OS) outcomes with segmentectomy over lobectomy, questions remain regarding the comparability of these surgical procedures for treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthetize existing evidence and to compare the survival outcomes observed for stage IA NSCLC following segmentectomy or lobectomy. 40 studies (38 observational, 2 RCTs) encompassing 103,926 patients were analyzed. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrences, harvested lymph nodes, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Risk of bias was assessed using established tools, and evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE. Non-RCTs showed an OS HR of 1.10 (95 % CI: 0.94-1.30, p = 0.24) with low certainty, contrasting with RCTs' HR of 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.66-1.02, p = 0.7) with moderate certainty. Local recurrences exhibited OR 1.40 (95 % CI: 0.94-2.08, p = 0.09) in non-RCTs with low certainty, and RR 1.61 (95 % CI: 1.12-2.31, p = 0.01) in RCTs with low certainty. Non-RCTs showed DFS HR 1.13 (95 % CI: 0.95-1.34, p = 0.18) with low certainty, while RCTs yielded HR 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.85-1.18, p = 0.97) with moderate certainty. Lobectomy resulted in more harvested lymph nodes. Postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly. While definitive evidence for OS, DFS, and postoperative outcomes differences was inconclusive, a potential increase in local recurrences following lobectomy was noted. Further well-designed studies are warranted to enhance evidence and inform clinical practice in stage I lung cancer surgery.

Oncological Outcomes of Sub-Lobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although lobectomy has been the treatment of choice for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sub-lobar resection (i.e., segmentectomy or wedge resection) has emerged as an alternative over time due to its ability to preserve additional lung function. This meta-analysis explores the survival outcomes of sub-lobar resection versus lobectomy in patients with stage I NSCLC (tumor size: ≤2 cm).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception up to July 28, 2023. The hazard ratios and odds ratios for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and mortality were calculated using the random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies, comprising 10,449 patients, were included. Sub-lobar resection demonstrated comparable OS and DFS to that of lobectomy. Similarly, there was no significant risk of mortality associated with any of the groups. However, the subgroup analysis according to patient selection (intentional, compromised, not specified, and both [intentional and compromised]) showed that the patients in the compromised subgroup had a poor DFS with sub-lobar resection as compared to lobectomy (hazard ratio: 1.52, confidence interval: 1.14-2.02, P = 0.004). Additionally, there was no significant difference in OS, DFS, or overall mortality in the results stratified by surgical procedure or patient selection.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with stage I NSCLC who underwent sub-lobar resection showed a significantly worse DFS and OS in the "compromised group." However, there was no overall significant difference in OS, DFS, or mortality in the sub-lobar resection group as compared to lobectomy.

Survival and pulmonary function in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after sublobar resection versus lobectomy: An updated meta-analysis

Traditionally, lobectomy was standard for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent RCTs suggest sublobar resection's comparable outcomes. Our meta-analysis, incorporating 30 studies (including four RCTs), assessed sublobar resection's efficacy. Employing a random-effects model and I2 statistics for heterogeneity, we found sublobar resection reduced DFS (HR 1.31, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 1.27, p < 0.01) overall. However, RCT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.28) or OS (p = 0.62). Sublobar resection is a viable option for well-selected patients.

Survival outcomes of segmentectomy and lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.

METHODS

A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were included, comparing segmentectomy and lobectomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.

RESULTS

The analysis incorporated 17 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 16 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent. Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.8 months after surgery. Over survival (OS): HR = 1.14, 95%CI(0.97,1.32), P = 0.10; disease-free survival (DFS): HR = 1.13, 95%CI(0.91,1.41), P = 0.27; recurrence-free survival (RFS): HR = 0.95, 95%CI(0.81,1.12), P = 0.54.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group. Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.

Limited resection is comparable to lobectomy for tumor size ≤ 2 cm pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has a rare incidence with better prognosis than nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the prognosis between limited resection and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

METHODS

Data were taken from two cohorts: In Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) corhort, we identified 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA who underwent surgery. In the SEER corhort, 480 patients with stage T1 IMA who after surgery were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for SPH corhort, lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for the SEER corhort and overall survival (OS) for both corhort were compared between patients undergoing lobectomy and limited resection by Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

In SPH corhort, patients who underwent limited resection had equivalent prognosis than those underwent lobectomy (5-year RFS: 79.3% versus. 82.6%, p = 0.116; 5-year OS: 86.2% versus. 88.3%, p = 0.235). However, patients with IMA > 2 to 3 cm had worse prognosis than those with IMA ≤ 2 cm (5-year RFS: 73.7% versus. 86.1%, p = 0.007). In the analysis of IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that limited resection was an independent risk factor of RFS (hazard ratio, 2.417; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-5.049; p = 0.019), while OS (p = 0.122) was not significantly different between two groups. For IMA ≤ 2 cm, limited resection was not a risk factor of RFS (p = 0. 953) and OS (p = 0.552). In the SEER corhort, IMA ≤ 2 cm subgroup, limited resection was equivalent prognosis in LCSS (p = 0.703) and OS (p = 0.830).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited resection could be a potential surgical option which comparable to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Effect of segmental versus lobectomy in minimally invasive surgery on postoperative wound complications in lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

It is still a matter of debate whether the surgical segmentectomy and lobectomy of lung cancer are comparable in the incidence of perioperative wound complications. An extensive review of the literature through August 2023 was carried out with a critical review of four databases. Following the acceptance and elimination criteria set out in the trial, as well as a qualitative assessment of the literature, this resulted in a review of related research that compared the results of both lobectomy and partial resection in the management of lung cancer. The analysis of the data was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software, and the 95% confidence interval [CI] and odds ratio [OR] were performed with either stationary or random-effect models. It is concluded that the operation time of lobectomy is shorter than that of sectioning in the treatment of segmentectomy (mean difference [MD], -38.62; 95% CI, -41.96, -35.28; p < 0.0001). But the rate of postoperative wound infection (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.18, 2.15; p = 0.45) and intraoperative blood loss (MD, 17.54; 95% CI, -4.19, 39.26; p = 0.11) were not significantly different for them. Thus, for those who have received a pulmonary carcinoma operation, different operative methods might not have an impact on the incidence of postoperative wound infections. The operative procedure appears to have a major impact on the length of the operation in patients.

Prognostic assessment of lung adenocarcinoma patients with early-staging diseases: a nomogram based on coagulation-related factors

OBJECTIVES

Early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) has a great heterogeneity in prognosis that is difficult to evaluate effectively. Thus, we developed and validated an effective nomogram prognostic model based on the clinical and laboratory characteristics of stage I-IIA ADC.

METHODS

We included 1585 patients with pathologically diagnosed stage I-IIA ADC who underwent surgery at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. The nomogram was constructed based on the peripheral blood test and coagulation test indicators and evaluated using Calibration plots, concordance index, decision curve analysis and the X-tile software. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The primary end point of this study was RFS.

RESULTS

Thrombin time and 4 clinical indicators for RFS were integrated into nomograms. A favourable agreement between the nomogram prediction and validation was observed in the calibration curves for RFS probabilities. The concordance index of the nomogram to predict RFS was 0.736 (95% confidence interval, 0.717-0.755). Moreover, significant differences were shown between the high-risk and low-risk groups in RFS and OS (P < 0.001) after effective cut-off values of risk points were found based on the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

We established and validated a prognostic nomogram including thrombin time to predict RFS and OS of stage I-IIA ADC patients. This nomogram provided an effective prediction ability for the prognosis of stage I-IIA ADC patients.

Development and validation of 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics-based nomogram to predict visceral pleural invasion in solid lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to establish a radiomics model based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images to predict visceral pleural invasion (VPI) of solid lung adenocarcinoma preoperatively.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 165 solid lung adenocarcinoma patients confirmed by histopathology with 18F-FDG PET/CT images. Patients were divided into training and validation at a ratio of 0.7. To find significant VPI predictors, we collected clinicopathological information and metabolic parameters measured from PET/CT images. Three-dimensional (3D) radiomics features were extracted from each PET and CT volume of interest (VOI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to determine the performance of the model. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) were calculated. Finally, their performance was evaluated by concordance index (C-index) and decision curve analysis (DCA) in training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

165 patients were divided into training cohort (n = 116) and validation cohort (n = 49). Multivariate analysis showed that histology grade, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), distance from the lesion to the pleura (DLP) and the radiomics features had statistically significant differences between patients with and without VPI (P < 0.05). A nomogram was developed based on the logistic regression method. The accuracy of ROC curve analysis of this model was 75.86% in the training cohort (AUC: 0.867; C-index: 0.867; sensitivity: 0.694; specificity: 0.889) and the accuracy rate in validation cohort was 71.55% (AUC: 0.889; C-index: 0.819; sensitivity: 0.654; specificity: 0.739).

CONCLUSIONS

A PET/CT-based radiomics model was developed with SUVmax, histology grade, DLP, and radiomics features. It can be easily used for individualized VPI prediction.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2023 Expert Consensus Document: Staging and multidisciplinary management of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy drugs have recently been approved for use in patients with surgically resectable lung cancer. Accurate staging, early molecular testing, and knowledge of recent trials are critical to optimize oncologic outcomes in these patients.

Oncological Outcomes of Segmentectomy versus Lobectomy in Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer up to Two Centimeters: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. In recent years, pulmonary segmentectomy has emerged as an alternative to lobectomy for the treatment of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Considering the conflicting results reported in the literature, the oncological effectiveness of segmentectomy remains controversial. To provide new insight into oncological results, we reviewed the literature, including recent randomized trials. Methods. We performed a systematic review for surgical treatment of stage I NSCLC up to 2 cm using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database from 1990 to December 2022. Primary outcomes for pooled analysis were overall and disease-free survival; secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and 30-day mortality. Results. Eleven studies were considered for the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis included 3074 and 2278 patients who received lobectomy and segmentectomy, respectively. The estimated pooled hazard ratio showed a similar hazard for segmentectomy compared to lobectomy in terms of overall and disease-free survival. The restricted mean survival time difference between the two procedures was statistically and clinically not significant for overall and disease-free survival. Nevertheless, the overall survival hazard ratio was time-dependent: segmentectomy was at a disadvantage starting from 40 months after surgery. Six papers reported 30-day mortality: there were no events on 1766 procedures. The overall relative risk showed that the postoperative complication rate was higher in segmentectomy compared to lobectomy, without statistical significance. Conclusions. Our results suggest that segmentectomy might be a useful alternative to lobectomy for stage I NSCLC up to 2 cm. However, this appears to be time-dependent; in fact, the risk ratio for overall mortality becomes unfavorable for segmentectomy starting at 40 months after surgery. This last observation, together with some still undefined questions (solid/non-solid ratio, depth of the lesion, modest functional savings, etc.), leave room for further investigations on the real oncological effectiveness of segmentectomy.

Post-operative and early oncological results of simple and complex full thoracoscopic segmentectomies for non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the treatment of clinical IA non-small-cell lung cancer is not well established. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to evaluate the oncological results of complex and simple video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

METHODS

From 2015 to June 2020, data of n = 163 consecutive patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for solitary pulmonary nodule were analysed. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to estimate, compare survivals and identify risk factors of worse oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

In this period, n = 123 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer: we performed n = 65 simple and n = 58 complex video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy; n = 99 (80.5%) had a solid appearance on computed tomography scan and n = 78 (63.4%) a moderate-to-high [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomographic computed tomography scan avidity. Mortality was 0%, and complications occurred in n = 14 (21.5%) and 9 (15.5%) patients. The median follow-up was 24 (range: 6-60) months and the 5-year overall survival was 96% without difference between video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomies (p = 0.16). Local recurrence developed in n = 2 (3.1%) and n = 3 (5.2%) patients; regional in n = 2 (3.1%) and 1 (1.8%) and distant in 8 (12.3%) and 2 (3.4%), without difference between video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomies (p = 0.51). The overall 5-year disease-free survival rate was 78%. Pathological upstaging was observed in n = 13 patients (nodal in n = 6, tumour in n = 7) and it was the only significant factor for worse disease-free survival at the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.04-8.68, p = 0.049), value confirmed also in the group of intended video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological upstaging after simple or complex video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy is a risk factor for recurrence and then video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy should be considered an appropriate therapeutic option for selected stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Minimally Invasive Anatomical Segmentectomy versus Lobectomy in Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess potential differences in perioperative outcomes and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with pathological stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy or lobectomy.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of EMBASE (through Ovid), MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted. Two researchers independently reviewed each eligible study that included patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy and lobectomy and compared perioperative and/or survival outcomes of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 887 publications were identified. Of these, 10 articles met our eligibility criteria. A significantly higher number of lymph nodes were harvested in lobectomies. The two groups did not significantly differ in postoperative complication rates, DFS, and OS. Patients who underwent segmentectomy had shorter postoperative hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive lobectomy and segmentectomy showed comparable short-term and long-term outcomes in stage IA NSCLC patients. Postoperative complication rates were similar. Minimally invasive lobectomies are associated with a higher number of harvested lymph nodes, although this did not affect the final staging or the survival outcomes.

Sublobectomy for stage IA1-2 invasive lung adenocarcinoma with consolidation tumor ratio ≤ 0.25

BACKGROUND

Sublobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a matter of debate. This study aimed to discuss the feasibility of sublobectomy in patients with pathological-stage IA1-2 confirmed as pathologically invasive but radiologically noninvasive adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2019, we screened clinical stage IA1-IA2 lung cancer patients who underwent surgery at the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH). Inclusion criteria were maximum tumor diameter of 2.0 cm or less, consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤ 0.25, and pathologically confirmed invasive adenocarcinoma. Sublobectomy (segmentectomy and wedge resection) and lobectomy groups were created, and propensity scores were computed. The primary endpoints were lung cancer-specific overall survival (LCSS) and LCS- relapse-free survival (LCS-RFS) after adjusting propensity scores.

RESULTS

A total of 1731 patients were screened, and 100 patients were enrolled. The lobectomy group had 51 patients and the limited resection group had 49. No cases relapsed, and two patients died from nontumor causes. For the entire cohort, the 5-year LCSS and 5-year LCS-RFS were 100% in the lobectomy and limited resection groups. When propensity scores matched, there were no differences in LCSS and LCS-RFS between the two groups (LCSS:100%, LCS-RFS 100% in lobectomy and limited resection, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Sublobectomy may be curative for pathologically invasive but radiologically noninvasive adenocarcinoma at pathological stage IA1-2.

Surgical strategies for patients with second primary non-small cell lung cancer lesions 2 cm or less in diameter

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The wide application of low-dose computed tomography (CT) has led to an increase in the detection of small lung cancer lesions. Moreover, surgical recommendations for second primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions ≤ 2 cm are obscure. This study compares the efficacy of wedge resection, lobectomy, and segmentectomy for small second primary NSCLC lesions.

METHODS

The cohort was established based on the SEER database. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) values were applied to identify prognostic factors. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to plot the survival curves of the different subgroups according to propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to then compare the therapeutic efficacy of the surgical procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 568 patients were enrolled in this study. Age, sex, grade, and lymph node ratio were selected as independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in survival probabilities among the groups of patients who underwent segmentectomy, wedge resection, or lobectomy (p > 0.05). We also established a nomogram model based on the four prognostic factors to guide clinical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of our study, segmentectomy was more appropriate than lobectomy for patients with a second primary NSCLC lesion ≤ 2 cm in diameter. The evidence to support other recommendations is insufficient.

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy: A propensity score–matched analysis

Objectives

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative complications, perioperative course, and survival among patients from the multicentric Spanish Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Group database who received video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy.

Methods

From December 2016 to March 2018, a total of 2250 patients were collected from 33 centers. Overall analysis (video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy = 2070; video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy = 180) and propensity score–matched adjusted analysis (video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy = 97; video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy = 97) were performed to compare postoperative results. Kaplan–Meier and competing risks method were used to compare survival.

Results

In the overall analysis, video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy showed a lower incidence of respiratory complications (relative risk, 0.56; confidence interval, 0.37-0.83; P = .002), lower postoperative prolonged air leak (relative risk, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.78; P = .003), and shorter median postoperative stay (4.8 vs 6.2 days; P = .004) than video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. After propensity score–matched analysis, prolonged air leak remained significantly lower in video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy (relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.89; P = .02). Kaplan–Meier and competing risk curves showed no differences during the 3-year follow-up (median follow-up in months: 24.4; interquartile range, 20.8-28.3) in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.7; P = .2), tumor progression–related mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-1.57; P = .2), and disease-free survival (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-1.51; P = .4) between groups.

Conclusions

Video-assisted thoracic surgery segmentectomy showed results similar to lobectomy in terms of postoperative outcomes and midterm survival. In addition, a lower incidence of prolonged air leak was found in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery anatomic segmentectomy.

Comparison Between Wedge Resection and Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surgery has become an accepted method for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this Bayesian meta-analysis was to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) between wedge resection and lobectomy/segmentectomy for treatment of early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible studies were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, and WanFang up to July 2021 and screened based on established selection criteria. The Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with the combination of the reported survival outcomes of the individual studies using a random-effect model. The OS, DFS, and RFS of the wedge resection group was compared with the lobectomy/segmentectomy group. The hazard ratio (HR) and standard error were extracted or calculated for each study using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

This study was registered with PROSPERO (INPLASY202080090).The pooled OS hazard ratio between segmentectomy and lobectomy was 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.4], the pooled HR between lobectomy and wedge resection was 0.71 [95% CI 0.52-0.96], and the pooled HR between segmentectomy and wedge was 0.80 [95% CI 0.56-1.10]. The pooled HR of DFS or RFS was not statistically significant among the three surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early-stage NSCLC received lobectomy had the lowest hazard ratio of OS than patients received wedge resection, indicating that the overall survival of patients received lobectomy was higher than patients received wedge resection. However, regarding DFS and RFS, the three surgical approaches showed no significant difference.

Comparison of operative and postoperative characteristics and outcomes between thoracoscopic segmentectomy and lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study from the Italian VATS Group Registry

OBJECTIVES

Only few studies compared the surgical morbidity and mortality of thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer, in particular, by relating the segmental resections with the corresponding anatomical lobes.

METHODS

We enrolled a total of 7487 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy (7269) or segmentectomy (218) from January 2014 to July 2019. A propensity score matching approach was used to account for potential confounding factors between the 2 groups. After matching, 349 lobectomies and 208 segmentectomies were included in the analysis. We analysed the operative and postoperative outcomes of video-assisted anatomical segmentectomy compared with video-assisted lobectomy and, in details, the results of segmentectomy with its corresponding lobectomy in a large cohort of patients from the Italian VATS Group Registry.

RESULTS

The overall conversion rate to thoracotomy was not statistically different between the groups (27 patients 8% vs 7 patients 3%, P = 0.1). The lobectomy group had a greater number of resected lymph nodes (median 11 vs 8, P = 0.006). No significant differences were detected in 30-day mortality (1.4%, 5 patients vs 0.9%, 2 patients), overall complications (18%, 62 patients vs 14%, 29 patients) and prolonged air leakage (31 patients, 9% vs 12 patients, 6%) between lobectomy and segmentectomy, respectively. No statistical differences were found regarding the median duration of drainage (3.2 days, P = 1) and the overall median length of hospital stay (6.4 days, P = 0.1) between the 2 groups. In the context of segmentectomy versus corresponding lobectomy, the right upper lobectomy compared with right upper segmentectomy showed a higher number of resected lymph nodes (P = 0.027). No statistical differences were reported in terms of conversion rate and postoperative complication and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy could be considered a safe procedure without significant differences compared to thoracoscopic lobectomy in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Cryobiopsy as a reliable technique for the preoperative identification of micropapillary/solid components in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Micropapillary (MIP) and solid (SOL) subtypes of early-stage lung adenocarcinomas are associated with lymph node metastasis and local recurrence after limited resection. Preoperative identification of these components may influence the decisions of treatment strategy, additional lymph node evaluation, indication for limited resection, and extent of lymph node dissection. However, conventional biopsy specimens are insufficient for identifying these subtypes, especially MIP components. Cryobiopsy can collect larger tissue samples with fewer crush artifacts than conventional forceps biopsy, which would be helpful for detecting MIP/SOL components. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the feasibility of using cryobiopsy for MIP/SOL subtype detection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent surgery for clinical IA lung cancer following a preoperative diagnosis of adenocarcinoma by cryobiopsy at our institution between October 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively examined. The concordance rate of MIP/SOL subtypes between the specimens obtained by cryobiopsy and surgery was investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 115 patients were evaluated. There were 26 (22.6%) and 14 (12.2%) patients with MIP and SOL subtypes, respectively. For concordance of MIP/SOL subtypes, the sensitivity was 65.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.7-65.7%). For the primary or secondary predominant patterns, a more satisfactory concordance rate of 72.2% (95% CI: 52.6-86.2%) was obtained. On assessing each subtype, high sensitivity was noted in SOL-predominant patterns (85.7%, 95% CI: 56.5%-96.0%) and MIP-secondary predominant patterns (83.3%, 95% CI: 45.8-97.0%). However, SOL-secondary predominant patterns revealed low sensitivity (0%, 95% CI, 0-38.2%). Overall, the MIP subtypes had higher sensitivity than the SOL subtypes (65.4% vs. 50.0%).

CONCLUSION

Cryobiopsy could be reliable for identifying MIP/SOL components, especially the MIP component, in clinical stage IA adenocarcinomas.

Pulmonary function changes after thoracoscopic lobectomy versus intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is increasingly used in the surgical treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, it remains unclear whether pulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection is in direct proportion to the number of resected segments, and thus intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy has the function-preserving advantage over thoracoscopic lobectomy.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, spirometry tests were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The observed functional loss was compared with the expected loss estimated by the segment counting method. Resection extent index was introduced as the number of resected segments to total number of segments in the corresponding lobe. Spirometry changes after thoracoscopic lobectomy and intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy were compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

There were 338 thoracoscopic lobectomies and 321 thoracoscopic segmentectomies. Overall, the observed pulmonary function loss after segmentectomy was significantly less than after lobectomy. But the observed functional loss was significantly greater than the expected loss after segmentectomy. And pulmonary function loss per segment resected was almost doubled after segmentectomy comparing to lobectomy. For segmentectomies with a resection extent index less than 0.5, especially single segmentectomies, pulmonary function loss was significantly less than after corresponding lobectomies. Otherwise, no significant differences in spirometry changes between lobectomies and segmentectomies were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection cannot be accurately evaluated by the number of resected segments. According to the resection extent index, intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy may help preserve more pulmonary function than thoracoscopic lobectomy only when less than half of the corresponding lobe are resected.

Propensity-matched Comparison of VATS Left Upper Tri-segmentectomy and Lobectomy

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the oncological outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) left upper tri-segmentectomy (LTS) versus left upper lobectomy (LUL) for patients presenting with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis identified 1543 consecutive patients presenting to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital with NSCLC for VATS-LTS or LUL from 2013-2017. After propensity-score matching for patient demographics and tumor characteristics, 273 pairs were identified. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 51.5 months. There were no significant differences in operative duration (2.11±0.64 versus 2.49±5.96 h, p=0.30), total blood loss (106.19±170.83 versus 97.07±149.34 mL, p=0.51) and operation complications (10% versus 8%, p=0.37) between LUL and LTS. Patients undergoing LUL had longer postoperative hospital stay (5.55±3.00 versus 4.87±2.33 days, p=0.003), greater tumor margin distance (3.3±1.2 versus 3.1±0.9 cm, p＜.001) and greater number of lymph nodes harvested (8.0±3.2 versus 6.8±3.3, p＜.001) than LTS, but the margin/tumor ratio was not statistically different (2.5±1.6 versus 2.3±1.1, p=0.11). Median DFS (49.5 versus 54.3 months, p=0.77) and OS (49.5 versus 55.0 months, p=0.88) were not significantly different between patients undergoing LTS and LUL, and similar outcomes were noted across subgroups of patients stratified by tumor stages, pathological type, and radiographic manifestations.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS-LTS and LUL had comparable oncological outcomes for stage I NSCLC, regardless of tumor pathological types and radiological findings, as long as negative margins were confirmed.

Benefit of three-dimensional image simulation in surgical resection of early stage lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The present study investigated the oncological outcomes of clinical stage IA2 non-small cell lung cancer that was treated using preoperative simulation and surgical resection.

METHODS

The data of patients who underwent surgical resection for clinical stage IA2 non-small cell lung cancer between January 2002 and June 2018 were reviewed. Preoperative simulations were indicated for patients with centrally located tumors who can undergo anatomic resection. The clinical features, imaging characteristics of the tumors, surgical approaches and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 1086 identified patients, 281 patients with clinical stage IA2 non-small cell lung were enrolled and categorized into 2 groups, with and without preoperative simulation. The tumor location, maximum standard uptake value, histological grade, disease-free survival and disease recurrence were significantly different between the 2 groups. For the group with preoperative simulations, 70.7% of the patients underwent anatomic resection, and 79.7% of the patients without preoperative simulations underwent anatomic resection (P <0.001). Patients with preoperative simulations had fewer relapses (2%) than patients without preoperative simulations (11.5%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative simulation confirmed the relationship between the tumor and surrounding blood vessels and bronchus and ensured an oncological safety margin. 3D simulations are a useful and feasible tool for planar operative procedures, satisfy the requirements for early-stage NSCLC. These results are promising but preliminary and more extended follow-up is needed.

Survival Outcomes of Lobectomy Versus Segmentectomy in Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The gold standard surgical therapy for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Meanwhile, segmentectomy has emerged as an alternative choice with the advantage of fewer postoperative complications. The acceptance of this procedure remains controversial, and conflicting results exist in the retrospective trials.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the survival outcomes of lobectomy versus segmentectomy in clinical stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

A computerized literature search was done on published trials in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to June 2019 to identify clinical trials. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were measured as outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed in the Meta-analysis Revman 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A systematic literature search was conducted including seven studies. In this meta-analysis, the LCSS and OS in the lobectomy group were linked to a markedly lower trend in comparison to the segmentectomy group without significant statistical difference (P > 0.05), indicating that lobectomy confers an equivalent survival outcome compared with segmentectomy.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in survival outcomes between lobectomy and segmentectomy. Further large-scale, prospective, randomized trials are needed to explore reasonable surgical treatments for early-stage lung cancer.

Application of Mimics Medical 21.0 software in thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy

BACKGROUND

The anatomical structure of pulmonary segments is complex, and there are many anatomical variations, making the operation more difficult, so we used Mimics Medical 21.0 software for three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA), carefully formulated the surgical plan and on this basis completed the video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy.

METHODS

A total of 38 patients with pulmonary nodules were selected and received video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical sublobectomy after using Mimics Medica 21.0 software for 3D-CTBA.

RESULTS

The mean operative duration was 158.42±20.21 minutes, and the operative hemorrhage was 97.66±22.37 mL. In pathological diagnoses, there were 5 benign cases (13.2%), 9 cases with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (23.7%), 12 cases with adenocarcinoma in situ (31.6%), 11 cases with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (28.9%) and 1 case with invasive adenocarcinoma (2.6%); 8.29±0.98 lymph nodes sampled had no metastasis. The chest tube drainage duration and postoperative hospitalstay were 2.47±0.73 days and 5.47±0.73 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Mimics Medical 21.0 software can quickly and accurately complete 3D-CTBA, which is beneficial to formulate a personalized anatomical sublobectomy surgical plan.

Segmentectomy or lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The role of segmentectomy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a matter of debate. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the oncological outcomes following segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I, stage IA only and stage IA <2 cm only.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature for articles reporting on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratios (HRs) were retrieved and pooled using an inverse variance-weighted approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in the analysis. In stage I, segmentectomy was found to be inferior to lobectomy for all 3 outcomes with HR: 1.25 (P = 0.01) for OS, 1.59 (P = 0.02) for CSS and 1.40 (P < 0.001) for RFS. In stage IA, the differences were significant for OS and CSS, though not for RFS with HR: 1.31 (P = 0.04), 1.56 (P = 0.02) and 1.22 (P = 0.11), respectively. In stage IA <2 cm, no significant differences were found between segmentectomy and lobectomy with HR: 1.13 (P = 0.37) for OS, 1.02 (P = 0.95) for CSS and 1.24 (P = 0.11) for RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

For stages I and IA, lobectomy showed superior results whereas for tumours <2 cm, our study did not find significant differences in oncological outcomes between both groups. These results suggest that segmentectomy might be a valuable alternative to lobectomy for NSCLC in tumours <2 cm.

Lobectomy vs. sublobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Although lobectomy is widely regarded as the treatment of choice for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sublobectomy (segmentectomy and wedge resection) has emerged as an alternative modality over the years. Only a handful of studies has compared the treatment effects of these two surgical interventions. This study aimed to analyze the treatment effects between lobectomy and sublobectomy on the survival outcomes of patients with stage I NSCLC systematically.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception up to February 2019 for studies that compared the survival outcomes of lobectomy and sublobectomy. Studies that reported the diagnosis of stage I NSCLC by imaging or pathophysiology, lobectomy as intervention, sublobectomy as control, and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as outcomes were included. The mean OS and DFS rates were calculated using the fixed-effects model.

Results

A total of 12 studies that included 4,373 patients with stage I NSCLC were included in the meta-analysis. The patients who underwent lobectomy showed a significant improvement in OS than those who underwent sublobectomy (P=0.025). These results differed when stratified by publication year (before 2010 and after 2010), study design (prospective and retrospective), country (Eastern and Western), control (segmentectomy and wedge), and study quality (high and low), but no significant differences were observed in DFS. These results were not altered in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Conclusions

Stage I NSCLC patients who undergo sublobectomy display poor OS, whereas the DFS is similar for both methods.

A bibliometric analysis of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer research (1992-2019)

BACKGROUND

This study intends to create a series of scientific maps to quantitatively estimate hot spots and emerging trends in segmentectomy versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) research with bibliometric methods.

METHODS

Articles published on segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Extracted information was analyzed quantitatively using bibliometric analysis by CiteSpace to find hot spots and frontiers in this research area.

RESULTS

A total of 362 scientific articles on segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC were collected, and the annual publication rate increased over time from 1992 to 2019. The leading country and the leading institution were the United States and University of Pittsburgh, respectively. Furthermore, the most prolific researchers were, namely, James D. Luketich, Rodney J. Landreneau, Matthew J. Schuchert, Morihito Okada, and David O. Wilson. The analysis of keywords pointed out that carcinoma, bronchogenic carcinoma, limited resection, segmental resection, and morbidity are hot spots and lymph node dissection, minimally invasive surgery, impact, epidemiology, and high risk are research frontiers in this field.

CONCLUSION

Publications related to segmentectomy versus lobectomy for NSCLC have made great achievements based on bibliometric analysis in recent years. However, further research and global collaboration are still required. Finally, we find that segmentectomy for the treatment of NSCLC is receiving much more attention from researchers globally compared with lobectomy in this research area.

Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and bronchography combined with three-dimensional printing for thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Compared with lobectomy, the anatomical structure of the lung segment is relatively complex and easy to occur variation, thus it increases the difficulty and risk of precise segmentectomy. The application of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) combined with a three-dimensional printing (3D printing) model can ensure the safety of operation and simplify the surgical procedure to a certain extent. We aimed to estimate the value of 3D-CTBA and 3D printing in thoracoscopic precise pulmonary segmentectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 65 patients who underwent anatomical segmentectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University from January 2019 to August 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: a 3D-CTBA combined with 3D printing group (30 patients) and a general group (35 patients). The perioperative data of the two groups were compared.

Results

Compared with the general segmentectomy group at the same period in our center, the surgery time of the group guided by 3D-CTBA and 3D printing was significantly shorter. Intraoperative blood loss in the 3D-CTBA and 3D printing group was also apparently lower than in the general group. Hospital stay and postoperative chest tube duration showed no significant differences between the two groups, and neither did postoperative complications such as pneumonia, hemoptysis, arrhythmia, and pulmonary air leakage.

Conclusions

3D-CTBA combined with 3D printing clearly identifies the precise pulmonary segmental structures, avoids intraoperative accidental injury, reduces intraoperative blood loss, shortens the operation time and improves the safety of thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Segmentectomy or Wedge Resection in Stage IA Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma?

Objectives: We performed this study to compare survival outcomes of segmentectomy (SG) and wedge resection (WR) in stage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) and lung adenocarcinoma (AD). Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (SEER), we identified 1529 and 4070 patients with stage IA SQCC and AD, respectively, who had complete clinical information between 2004 and 2015. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine the propensity score for patients with limited resection based on the preoperative characteristics of patients. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared in patients treated with WR and SG after adjusting, stratifying, or matching lung cancer patients according to propensity score. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that there was a statistically significant difference in survival curves (log rank P=0.01) for patients with stage IA SQCC between SG and WR. But there was no statistically significant difference in survival curves (log rank P>0.05) in patients with stage IA AD between the two limited resections. Compared with the WR, The hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of SG were 0.689 (0.519-0.914) and 0.896 (0.752-1.067) in patients with stage IA SQCC and AD, respectively. Conclusion: This study suggests that SG can yield superior survival outcome compared with WR in patients with stage IA SQCC. However, the survival outcomes of SG and WR are generally equivalent in patients with stage IA AD.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Undergo Pulmonary Segmentectomy

This study retrospectively investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of the non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent segmentectomy as either intentional or passive limited surgery. The subjects included in this study comprised 72 patients who underwent segmentectomy at our hospital. There were 23 patients who underwent intentional segmentectomy. The histologic type was adenocarcinoma in all of these patients. Regarding the tumor size, 9 tumors were 1 cm or less in diameter, 13 were 1.1 to 2 cm, and 1 was 2.5 cm. All patients who underwent intentional segmentectomy were alive without any recurrence as of the last follow-up examination. A passive segmentectomy was performed for 49 patients. The reasons for passive segmentectomy were due to the presence of metachronous multiple lung cancer in 14 patients, synchronous multiple lung cancer in 9 patients, age above 80 years in 12 patients, reduced pulmonary function in 8 patients, and moderate to severe cardiovascular disease in 4 patients; another 2 patients were receiving treatment for another primary cancer. The 5-year survival rate of the patients who underwent passive segmentectomy was 69.8%. There was no postoperative mortality in either of the groups. This study showed that all of the patients who underwent intentional segmentectomy were alive without any recurrence, thus suggesting that the procedure is associated with sufficient oncologic efficacy, along with preservation of the lung function. The passive segmentectomy was a feasible procedure and was an alternative procedure with an acceptable overall survival rate in high-risk patients with underlying medical comorbidities.

Surgical procedure of segmentectomy as a possible cause of postoperative cerebral embolism: a case report

Background

Cerebral embolism after lobectomy is a life-threatening complication during the early postoperative period. However, it is unclear if cerebral embolism can develop after segmentectomy.

Case presentation

We experienced a case of a 37-year-old man who demonstrated early symptom of acute ischemic stroke in early postoperative period after right upper posterior segmentectomy and performed intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy (IAMT) successfully.

Conclusions

Long and irregular pulmonary vein stump (PVS) and endothelial injury caused by surgical procedure may lead to cerebral embolism after segmentectomy. We believe that doing preoperative pulmonary vascular assessment and using appropriate surgical procedure may reduce the rate of cerebral embolism.

Prognosis of segmentectomy in the treatment of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

With improvements in detection technology, increasing numbers of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are being diagnosed at an early stage. In order to treat the illness with minimal invasion and preserve lung function to the greatest possible extent, there has been an increasing tendency towards treating early-stage NSCLC by segmentectomy. However, questions remain regarding whether patients may benefit from this procedure considering the surgical and oncological outcomes. Whether adequate margin distance and lymph node dissection may be achieved is one of the most important issues associated with this procedure. The present study reviews the prognosis of segmentectomy in the treatment of stage IA NSCLC.

Uniportal versus Multiportal Thoracoscopic Complex Segmentectomy: Propensity Matching Analysis

Purpose: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) complex segmentectomy has been challenging for thoracic surgeons. This study was designed to compare the perioperative outcomes between uniportal and multiportal VATS complex segmentectomy.

Methods: Data on a total of 122 uniportal and 57 multiportal VATS complex segmentectomies were assessed. Propensity score (PS) matching yielded 56 patients in each group. A crude comparison and PS matching analyses, incorporating preoperative variables, were conducted to elucidate the short-term outcomes between uniportal and multiportal VATS complex segmentectomies.

Results: The uniportal group had a significantly shorter operation time (173 min vs. 195 min, p = 0.004), pleural drainage duration (2.5 d vs. 3.5 d, p <0.001), and postoperative hospital stay (4.2 d vs. 5.3 d, p <0.001) before matching, and a significant difference was also observed after matching for pleural drainage duration (2.5 d vs. 3.6 d, p <0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (4.5 d vs. 5.2 d, p = 0.001). The numbers of dissected lymph nodes in N1 and N2 stations, the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between these two groups.

Conclusions: The uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy was not inferior to multiportal VATS in terms of perioperative outcomes and therefore should be considered as a viable surgical approach for treatment.

Prediction of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer on CT: deep learning model achieves a radiologist-level performance with adaptive sensitivity and specificity to clinical needs

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a preoperative CT-based deep learning model for the prediction of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) in early-stage lung cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, dataset 1 (for training, tuning, and internal validation) included 676 patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinomas resected between 2009 and 2015. Dataset 2 (for temporal validation) included 141 patients with clinical stage I adenocarcinomas resected between 2017 and 2018. A CT-based deep learning model was developed for the prediction of VPI and validated in terms of discrimination and calibration. An observer performance study and a multivariable regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the model was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.84), which was comparable to those of board-certified radiologists (AUC, 0.73-0.79; all p > 0.05). The model had a higher standardized partial AUC for a specificity range of 90 to 100% than the radiologists (all p < 0.05). The high sensitivity cutoff (0.245) yielded a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 31.2%, and the high specificity cutoff (0.448) resulted in a sensitivity of 47.9% and a specificity of 86.0%. Two of the three radiologists provided highly sensitive (93.8% and 97.9%) but not specific (48.4% and 40.9%) diagnoses. The model showed good calibration (p > 0.05), and its output was an independent predictor for VPI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The deep learning model demonstrated a radiologist-level performance. The model could achieve either highly sensitive or highly specific diagnoses depending on clinical needs.

KEY POINTS

• The preoperative CT-based deep learning model demonstrated an expert-level diagnostic performance for the presence of visceral pleural invasion in early-stage lung cancer. • Radiologists had a tendency toward highly sensitive, but not specific diagnoses for the visceral pleural invasion.

The Application of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomical Segmentectomy for Lung Resection: A Retrospective Clinical Study

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a new area of exploration and evolution in thoracic minimal invasive surgery. The uniportal VATS approach has become popular during lung resection for small nodules and ground glass lesions. Our objective is to investigate the efficacy, availability and safety of uniportal VATS anatomical segmentectomy compared with conventional VATS in patients for lung resection.

METHODS

Surgical patients of perioperative period who admitted and underwent uniportal, two-port and conventional three-port VATS segmentectomy were analyzed and compared retrospectively during the year 2017 to 2018.

RESULTS

During the research period, of 111 patients who had VATS anatomical segmentectomy, 38 underwent uniportal, 43 underwent two-port, and 30 underwent three-port VATS. Four patients underwent conversion to thoracotomy. There were no postoperative mortalities, and there were no significant differences among the three groups in surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, conversions to thoracotomy, drainage time and volume, lymph node dissection, postoperative complications and hospital stay. The pain scores of visual analog scale (VAS) significantly decreased in uniportal group when operation is finished (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that uniportal VATS anatomical segmentectomy is a quite safe surgical technology, as well as feasible, which can cause reduced postoperative pain and less surgical trauma compared to conventional VATS. More experiences and observations of large samples are on the way.

Meta-analysis of association between CT-based features and tumor spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma

Objective

Spread through air space (STAS) is a novel invasive pattern of lung adenocarcinoma and is also a risk factor for recurrence and worse prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection. The aims of this study are to evaluate the association between computed tomography (CT)-based features and STAS for preoperative prediction of STAS in lung adenocarcinoma, eventually, which could help us choose appropriate surgical type.

Methods

Systematic research was conducted to search for studies published before September 1, 2019. The association between CT-based features of radiological tumor size>2 cm、pure solid nodule、 part-solid nodule or Percentage of solid component (PSC)>50% and STAS was evaluated. According to rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight studies including 2385 patients published between 2015 and 2018 were finally enrolled in our meta-analysis.

Results

Our results clearly depicted that there is no significant relationship between radiological tumor size>2 cm and STAS with the combined OR of 1.47(95% CI:0.86–2.51). Meta-analysis of 3 studies showed that pure solid nodule in CT image were more likely to spread through air spaces with pooled OR of 3.10(95%CI2.17–4.43). Meta-analysis of 5 studies revealed the part-solid nodule in CT image may be more likely to appear STAS in adenocarcinoma (ADC) (combined OR:3.10,95%CI:2.17–4.43). PSC>50% in CT image was a significant independent predictor in the diagnosis of STAS in ADC from our meta-analysis with combined OR of 2.95(95%CI:1.88–4.63).

Conclusion

In conclusion, The CT-based features of pure solid nodule、part-solid nodule、PSC>50% are promising imaging biomarkers for predicting STAS in ADC and may substantially influence the choice of surgical type. In future, more studies with well-designed and large-scale are needed to confirm the conclusion.

Stapled video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy preserves as much lung volume as nonstapled video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy

BACKGROUND

Two different techniques of performing segmentectomy have been reported in the era of video-assisted thoracosopic surgery (VATS), including stapled segmentectomy (SS) and non-stapled segmentectomy (NSS). Some surgeons favor stapled segmentectomy for better pneumostatic control, while others prefer non-stapled segmentectomy to avoid compromising adjacent pulmonary parenchyma. In this study, we used multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and spirometry to evaluate lung volume preservation of different segmentectomy techniques.

METHODS

A total of 269 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy between October 2013 and September 2016 in a single institution were reviewed. Perioperative outcomes, the cost of hospital admission, the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (ΔFEV1 and ΔFEV1%), and residual ipsilateral volume ratios (RiVR) were compared.

RESULTS

The final study population consisted of 107 patients: 30 patients underwent NSS, and 77 patients underwent SS. The NSS group had significantly longer operative time, more blood loss, longer duration of chest tube placement and postoperative hospitalization than the SS group. The follow-up of RiVR (at 6 months, 12 months, 24 months), ΔFEV1(L), and ΔFEV1(%) demonstrated no significant difference between NSS and SS group.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that postoperative residual lung volume was not influenced by different segmentectomy techniques.

Survival Following Segmentectomy or Lobectomy in Patients With Stage IB Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Background: Lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection has always been recognized as the standardized treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the feasibility of segmentectomy performed in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains controversial. The present study aims to investigate whether the outcome of stage IB NSCLC patients undergoing segmentectomy was comparable to those who underwent lobectomy.

Method: We retrospectively collected data of 11,010 patients with primary stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were assessed among patients who were performed lobectomy or segmentectomy. To further assess the impact of the surgical procedures on patients with different tumor sizes, subgroups stratified by tumor size were analyzed.

Results: A total of 11,010 patients who were pathologically confirmed to be stage IB were included, of whom 10,453 received lobectomy and 557 received segmentectomy. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the patients receiving lobectomy had better OS [hazards ratio (HR) = 1.197, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.066, 1.343), P < 0.001] than those receiving segmentectomy. However, multivariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in LCSS between lobectomy and segmentectomy [HR = 1.172, 95% CI (0.963, 1.427), P = 0.114]. Meanwhile, subgroup analyses showed that lobectomy rather than segmentectomy was associated with better OS [HR = 1.278, 95% CI (1.075, 1.520) P = 0.006] and LCSS [HR = 1.118, 95% CI (1.005, 1.280), P = 0.047] for patients with a tumor size (TS) of ≤ 40 and >30 mm, while for patients with a TS of ≤ 30 mm, lobectomy yielded similar OS [TS ≤ 20 mm: HR = 1.068, 95% CI (0.853, 1.336), P = 0.566; TS > 20 mm and ≤ 30 mm: HR = 1.195, 95% CI (0.961, 1.487), P = 0.109] and LCSS [TS ≤ 20 mm: HR = 1.029, 95% CI: (0.682, 1.552), P = 0.893; TS > 20 and ≤ 30 mm: HR = 1.144, 95% CI (0.795, 1.645), P = 0.469] to that of segmentectomy.

Conclusion: Segmentectomy achieved equivalent OS and LCSS in stage IB NSCLC patients with TS ≤ 30 mm compared with lobectomy. Lobectomy showed better OS and LCSS than segmentectomy for patients with a TS of >30 and ≤ 40 mm. Segmentectomy may be acceptable in patients with an older age and a smaller TS.

Oncologic outcomes of lobectomy vs. segmentectomy in non-small cell lung cancer with clinical T1N0M0 stage: a literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Lobectomy has long been regarded as the standard treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies suggested that segmentectomy could achieve a good prognosis for early-stage NSCLC and might be an alternative to lobectomy in this cohort. Until now, on the issue of comparison between lobectomy and segmentectomy, there remains no published randomized controlled trial (RCT), and all existing evidence is low. Recently, a categorization of lower-level evidence has been proposed, namely, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the oncologic outcome between lobectomy and segmentectomy in NSCLC with the clinical T1N0M0 stage according to the GRADE system.

Methods

PubMed, the PMC database, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched prior to May 2019 to identify studies that compared the prognosis between lobectomy and segmentectomy for clinical T1N0M0 NSCLC. The evidence level of the included studies was assessed according to the GRADE system, including level IIA, probably not confounded nonrandomized comparison; level IIB, possibly confounded nonrandomized comparison; and level IIC, probably confounded nonrandomized comparison. The predefined outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

Twelve nonrandomized studies involving 8,072 participants were included. Of these studies, two were classified as IIA level (16.7%), six as IIB level (50.0%), and four as IIC level (33.3%). When crude HRs were included, compared with lobectomy, segmentectomy was associated with shorter OS but comparable DFS in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.45, 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.67; DFS, pooled HR =1.03, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.82) and in patients with nodules ≤2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.55, 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.80; DFS, pooled HR =0.98, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.77). When adjusted HRs were included, the impact of segmentectomy on OS and DFS was comparable to that of lobectomy in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.39, 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.10; DFS, pooled HR =0.83, 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03) and in patients with nodules ≤2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.61, 95% CI, 0.87 to 3.00; DFS, pooled HR =0.90, 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27).

Conclusions

Based on our results, although shorter OS is observed in patients received segmentectomy, it is necessary to wait for more results from RCT to draw a valid conclusion.

Uniportal VATS approach to sub-lobar anatomic resections: literature review and personal experience

Surgical scientific literature contains relatively little information regarding the surgical outcomes of anatomic sublobar resections performed with the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) technique. This paper attempts to evaluate the role of U-VATS segmentectomies in the landscape of a minimally invasive approach to the treatment of early stage non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Operative outcomes and long-term survival of robotic-assisted segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy

Background

Robotic anatomic segmentectomy (RATS) for early-stage lung cancer is being increasingly performed in spite of limited published evidence. To evaluate its safety and oncologic efficacy, we compared the outcomes of both RATS and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) segmentectomy in patients with small-sized (<2 cm) peripheral stage IA lung cancer.

Methods

From November 2011 to January 2018, a total of 130 patients with resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent RATS (n=50) and VATS (n=80) pulmonary segmentectomy were included. Clinicopathologic data, recurrence rate, and survival were recorded.

Results

The demographics, pulmonary function, comorbidity, and tumor size were similar between RATS segmentectomy and VATS segmentectomy. The surgery time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and blood loss were reduced in the RATS group compared to the VATS group. The number of totally dissected lymph nodes and postoperative complications were similar between the 2 groups. There was no operative mortality. The intensity of narcotic use during hospital stay and the time to return to routine daily activities were also reduced in the RATS group. There was no recurrence observed in the RATS group during the median 38-month follow-up period; meanwhile, during a median 85-month follow-up period in the VATS group, local recurrence and distant recurrence was observed in 2 patients (2.5%) and 3 patients (3.75%) respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year recurrence-free survival between the RATS and VATS groups (100% vs. 93.75%; P>0.05).

Conclusions

RATS can be performed safely and effectively in patients with early-stage NSCLC. The reduced narcotic use and earlier return to routine daily activities of RATS patients might reflect its less traumatic nature as compared to VATS. For stage IA disease with small tumors (<2 cm), segmentectomy performed by RATS has better oncologic efficacy when compared to VATS, although in this study, this difference did not reach statistical difference.

Equivalent Survival Between Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The oncologic efficacy of segmentectomy is controversial. We compared long-term survival in clinical stage IA (T1N0) Medicare patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was linked to Medicare data in 14,286 lung cancer patients who underwent segmentectomy (n = 1654) or lobectomy (n = 12,632) for clinical stage IA disease from 2002 to 2015. Cox regression was used to create a long-term survival model. Patients were then propensity matched on demographic and clinical variables to derive matched pairs.

RESULTS

In Cox modeling segmentectomy was associated with survival similar to lobectomy in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.20; P = .64) and in the matched subcohort. A subanalysis restricted to the 2009 to 2015 population (n = 11,811), when T1a tumors were specified and positron emission tomography results and mediastinal staging procedures were accurately recorded in the database, also showed that segmentectomy and lobectomy continue to have similar survival (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.16). Subanalysis of the pathologic N0 patients demonstrated the same results.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy and segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer are equally effective treatments with similar survival. Surgeons from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database appear to be selecting patients appropriately for sublobar procedures.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy provide similar perioperative and oncological outcomes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of 12 studies comparing outcomes after VATS lobectomy and VATS segmentectomy for stage I NSCLC. Data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Disease-free survival (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.33, P = 0.39), overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.38, P = 0.36), postoperative complications (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.75, P = 0.7), intraoperative blood loss (MD = 3.87, 95% CI - 10.21 to 17.94, P = 0.59), operative time (MD = 10.89, 95% CI - 13.04 to 34.82, P = 0.37), air leak > 5 days (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.17, P = 0.55), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 0.39 to 7.16, P = 0.49) were comparable between the groups. Postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 0.69, 95% CI - 1.19 to - 0.19, P = 0.007) and number of dissected lymph nodes (MD = - 6.44, 95%CI - 9.49 to - 3.40, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in VATS segmentectomy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy provide similar oncological and perioperative outcomes for stage I NSCLC patients. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO and can be accessed at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID = CRD42019133398.

Three-dimensional printing in the preoperative planning of thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy

Background

The purpose of this study is to explore whether 3D printing has a better clinical value for making a preoperative plan than three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) in thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy.

Methods

We collected a total of 124 patients' clinical data who underwent thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy from October 2017 to August 2018. According to the preoperative examination, the patients were divided into three groups: general group, 3D-CT group, and 3D printing group. The clinical data of each group were analyzed and compared.

Results

Compared with the general group, intraoperative blood loss in 3D-CT group and 3D printing group decreased significantly (P<0.05). Operation time in 3D-CT group and 3D printing group was significantly shorter than in the general group (P<0.05). Between 3D-CT group and 3D printing group intraoperative blood loss and operation time had no significant differences (P>0.05). Postoperative chest tube duration and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between each group P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative hemoptysis in the general group occurred higher than in the 3D-CT group and 3D printing group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Postoperative complications of pneumonia, atelectasis, and pulmonary air leakage (>6 d) had no significant differences between each group (P>0.05).

Conclusions

3D printing and 3D-CT for making a preoperative plan have an equivalent effect in thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy for experienced surgeons. Preoperative simulations using 3D printing for the assessment of pulmonary vessel and bronchi branching patterns is beneficial for the safe and efficient performance of thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy.

Comparison of postoperative complications between segmentectomy and lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Compared to lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), segmentectomy by VATS has a potential higher risk of postoperative atelectasis and air leakage. We compared postoperative complications between these two procedures, and analyzed their risk factors.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resections by VATS from January 2014 to March 2018 in two Swiss university hospitals. All complications were reported. A logistic regression model was used to compare the risks of complications for the two interventions. Adjustment for patient characteristics was performed using a propensity score, and by including risk factors separately.

RESULTS

Among 690 patients reviewed, the major indication for lung resection was primary lung cancer (86.4%) followed by metastasis resection (5.8%), benign lesion (3.9%), infection (3.2%) and emphysema (0.7%). Postoperatively, there were 80 instances (33.3%) of complications in 240 segmentectomies, and 171 instances (38.0%) of complications in 450 lobectomies (P = 0.73). After adjustment for the patient's propensity to be treated by segmentectomy rather than lobectomy, the risks of a complication remained comparable for the two techniques (odds ratio for segmentectomy 0.91 (0.61-1.30), p = 0.59). Length of hospital stay and drainage duration were shorter after segmentectomy. On multivariate analysis, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score above 2 and a forced expiratory volume in one second below 80% of predicted value were significantly associated with the occurrence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of complications and their grade were similar between segmentectomy and lobectomy by VATS.

Use of Autofluorescence to Intraoperatively Diagnose Visceral Pleural Invasion From Frozen Sections in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma 2 cm or Less

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively investigate the accuracy of frozen sections for diagnosing visceral pleural invasion (VPI) by autofluorescence and evaluated its usefulness in sublobar resection.

METHODS

We included patients with lung adenocarcinoma 2 cm or less to evaluate the diagnostic performance of autofluorescence for VPI in frozen sections via a fluorescence microscope. Furthermore, the impact of VPI on patients treated with sublobar resection was assessed in another cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were enrolled. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of autofluorescence for VPI diagnosis was 95.5%, 86.8%, and 100%, respectively. Sublobar resection was an independent risk factor for recurrence in patients with lung adenocarcinomas 2 cm or less with VPI positivity (hazard ratio, 3.30; P = .023), whereas it was not in those with VPI negativity.

CONCLUSIONS

Using autofluorescence in frozen sections appears to be an accurate method for diagnosing VPI, which is helpful for surgical decision making.

The B1 defective type of bifurcated right upper lobe bronchus

Background

As the more application of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), a great number of ground glass opacity (GGO) is identified. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy is technically more difficult than lobectomy because of the anatomical complexity. Three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography angiography (3D-CTBA) is a powerful tool for thoracic surgeons to analyze pulmonary anatomy, allowing a better understanding of the pulmonary anatomy in each patient. Here we encountered seven cases of bifurcated right upper bronchus (B1 defective). The variation in vascular pattern of these patients is analyzed.

Methods

Between October 2018 and December 2018, a consecutive 162 patients with pulmonary lesions were admitted and underwent 3D-CTB prior to surgery. A total of seven cases of bifurcated right upper bronchus (B1 Defective) were identified. Then 3D-CTBA reconstruction was performed by Syngo MultiModality Workplace (Software: Syngo MMWP, Version: VF40A). Radiology colleagues processed all 3D images and thoracic surgeons confirmed the validity of all reconstructions.

Results

The mean age of the seven patients (3 females and 4 males) is 54 years. According to the branches of artery, they are divided into two types: "Tr. sup + A. asc" (2/7, 28.6%) and "Tr. sup + Tr. inf + A. asc" (5/7, 71.4%). According to the branches of A2 asc, another two types can be divided: type A, two branches of A2a asc + A2b asc (4/7, 57.1%) and type B, only one branch of A2b asc (3/7, 42.9%). Types can also be divided according to the branches of A2 rec: A, no A2 rec (4/7, 57.1%); B, one branch of A2a rec (2/7, 28.6%); C, two branches of A2a rec + A2b rec (1/7, 14.3%). According to the origins of A3, three types can be divided: A, A3 origins from Tr. inf (1/7, 14.3%); B, A3 origins from Tr. sup (2/7, 28.6%); C, A3 origins from both Tr. sup and Tr. inf (4/7, 57.1%).

Conclusions

The "defective B1" type of bifurcated right upper lobe (RUL) bronchus is relatively rare. A pre-operative understanding of its anatomical features, especially the vascular variation patterns, may be helpful for completing a satisfactory segmentectomy. 3D-CTBA is a powerful tool, allowing a better understanding of the pulmonary anatomy in each patient before and during surgical procedures.

[A Review on Comparison of Lobectomy and Segmentectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is a worldwide malignancy with high morbidity and mortality in the world. With the application of low-dose spiral computed tomography in the screening and diagnosis of lung cancer, more lung cancers are detected at an early stage and cured by surgical treatment. Anatomical lobectomy has long been the standard procedure for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, whether intentional segmentectomy can be more used remains controversial. And this paper focuses on the question.
.