Cirrhosis as a Moderator of Outcomes in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Operations: A 12-Year Population-Based Study

Off-Pump Reduces Risk of Coronary Bypass Grafting in Patients with High MELD-XI Score

BACKGROUND

 This study aimed to assess the influence of the model of end-stage liver disease without International Normalized Ratio (INR) (MELD-XI) score on outcomes after elective coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) without (Off-Pump) or with (On-Pump) cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

 We calculated MELD-XI (5.11 × ln serum bilirubin + 11.76 × ln serum creatinine in + 9.44) for 3,535 consecutive patients having undergone elective CABG between 2009 and 2020. A MELD-XI threshold was determined using the Youden Index based on receiver operating characteristics. Propensity score matching and logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for inhospital mortality and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE).

RESULTS

 Patients were 68 ± 10 years old (76% male). Average MELD-XI was 10.9 ± 3.25. The MELD-XI threshold was 11. Patients below this threshold had somewhat lower EuroSCORE II than those above (3.5 ± 4 vs. 4.1 ± 4.7, p < 0.01), but mortality was almost four times higher above the threshold (below 1.5% vs. above 6.2%, p < 0.001). Two-thirds of patients received Off-Pump CABG. There was a trend towards higher risk in Off-Pump patients. Mortality was numerically but not statistically different to On-Pump below the MELD XI threshold (1.3 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.34) and was significantly lower above the threshold (4.9 vs. 8.9%, p < 0.02). Off-Pump above the threshold was also associated with less low-output syndrome and fewer strokes. Equalizing baseline differences by propensity matching verified the significant mortality difference above the threshold. Multivariable regression analysis revealed MELD-XI, On-Pump, atrial fibrillation, and the De Ritis quotient (Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT)/Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT)) as independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSION

 Elective CABG patients with elevated MELD-XI scores are at increased risk for perioperative mortality and morbidity. This risk can be significantly mitigated by performing CABG Off-Pump.

European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and Liver Dysfunction

Background: The importance of liver dysfunction in predicting mortality in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery is an important topic due to the general desire to improve current risk scores such as EUROSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation), with EUROSCORE III being currently under development. The model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score has already proven its utility in predicting outcomes for patients undergoing abdominal, cardiovascular or urological surgery. In the present study, we want to see its usefulness in proving the postoperative mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Methods: This was a retrospective study, and it included 185 patients, with 93 survivors being randomly chosen from a total of 589 surviving patients using age, emergency and the weight of cardiac procedures as criteria to match the 92 deceased patients during hospitalization in the postoperative period who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone or CABG and other concomitant cardiovascular interventions during a 10-year period of time. We calculated for all these patients, at the time of admission, the MELD Score and EUROSCORE II, and we analyzed the predictive performance of the two scores and their constituents. Results: In the multivariable model, patients with a MELD Score ≥ 5.54 had a 2.38-fold increased risk of death (95% C.I.: 1.43-3.96, p = 0.001), while those with a EUROSCORE ≥ 10.37 had a 8.66-fold increased risk of death (95% C.I.: 3.09-24.29, p < 0.001). After combining the two scores, the conditional scenario achieved a high overall accuracy of 84.32% (p < 0.001) in predicting mortality. Conclusions: Patients with a MELD Score ≥ 5.54, had good sensitivity and a very good specificity in terms of mortality prediction, but the conditional scenario, leveraging both risk scores, i.e., the MELD Score and EUROSCORE, offers the highest utility in terms of enhancing mortality prediction regarding these patients.

Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review assesses the outcomes of coronary interventions in patients with liver cirrhosis and coronary artery disease (CAD), focusing on the clinical challenges posed by cirrhosis-related hemodynamic and coagulopathic changes. It highlights essential considerations for managing these patients, who have an increased risk of adverse events during coronary procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing PCI experience significantly higher mortality rates compared to non-cirrhotic patients, particularly in the context of STEMI and NSTEMI. Coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia increase the risk of bleeding and vascular complications during interventions. Radial access has been suggested as a safer alternative to femoral access in these patients due to reduced bleeding complications. Additionally, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a prevalent risk, with cirrhotic patients demonstrating higher rates of acute kidney injury post-PCI. Preventive strategies such as minimizing contrast exposure and utilizing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are recommended. Managing CAD in cirrhotic patients requires careful consideration of their unique pathophysiological state. Higher in-hospital mortality, bleeding risks, and vascular complications necessitate tailored procedural strategies, such as radial access and contrast minimization. The balance between thrombotic and bleeding risks is critical in decision-making, with IVUS and hydration strategies being promising approaches. Further research is required to optimize treatment protocols and improve long-term outcomes for this high-risk population.

Association of liver dysfunction with outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver dysfunction is a known risk factor in the cardiovascular field. It specifically increases perioperative risk in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Since percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the much less invasive procedure for the treatment of coronary artery disease, we aimed to assess the relationship of liver dysfunction with outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

Three libraries were searched (MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library). We performed a meta-analysis of all studies in patients who underwent PCI that provided information on the presence or absence of liver dysfunction. Primary outcome was short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), bleeding and acute kidney injury. Random-effects model was applied.

RESULTS

Five studies were selected and the data from 10,710,317 patients were included in the final analysis. In comparison with the absence of liver dysfunction, patients with liver dysfunction were associated with higher short-term mortality (OR 2.97, 95%CI 1.23-7.18, p = 0.02), higher MACCE (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.08-1.87, p = 0.01), and higher bleeding (OR 2.23, 95%CI 1.65-3.00, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference regarding acute kidney injury (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.50-2.87, p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis suggests that liver dysfunction in patients undergoing PCI is independently associated with higher risk of short-term mortality and increased occurrence of MACCE and bleeding. However, there appears to be no association to acute kidney injury.

Association Between Chronic Liver Disease and Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Undergoing CABG: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Despite a 30% decrease in the rate over the last decade, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains a common major surgical procedure with significant morbidity and mortality. Chronic liver disease (CLD) patients, with increased survival rates because of medical advancements, are now frequently being considered for CABG, bearing higher perioperative risks. This study investigates the association between CLD and in-hospital outcomes in CABG patients using retrospective data from the National Inpatient Sample database (2016 to 2020) including 7,945 CLD patients who underwent CABG that were propensity score-matched with an equivalent number of patients without CLD who underwent CABG. Clinical variables were extracted using corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, and multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to assess in-hospital mortality, complications, and length of stay. The overall mortality rate was 5.5% (8.6% in the CLD group with cirrhosis, 5.9% CLD group without cirrhosis, and 2.8% in the non-CLD group, p <0.001). CLD with cirrhosis was associated with higher odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 4.21, 95% confidence interval 3.61 to 4.94) and length of stay (β = 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.05). CLD patients with cirrhosis demonstrated higher odds of perioperative cardiac complications (cardiac arrest, ventricular arrhythmias, tamponade, and shock), thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel ischemia, acute kidney injury, pneumonia, and sepsis. This study reveals a substantial impact of CLD on adverse outcomes in CABG patients, emphasizing the need for tailored preoperative assessments and postoperative care.

The Impact of Silent Liver Disease on Hospital Length of Stay Following Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Objectives: Risk assessment models for cardiac surgery do not distinguish between degrees of liver dysfunction. We have previously shown that preoperative liver stiffness is associated with hospital length of stay following cardiac surgery. The authors hypothesized that a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥ 9.5 kPa would rule out a short hospital length of stay (LOS < 6 days) following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Methods: A prospective observational study of one hundred sixty-four adult patients undergoing non-emergent isolated CABG surgery at a single university hospital center. Preoperative liver stiffness measured by ultrasound elastography was obtained for each participant. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the adjusted relationship between LSM and a short hospital stay. Results: We performed multivariate logistic regression models using short hospital LOS (<6 days) as the dependent variable. Independent variables included LSM (< 9.5 kPa, ≥ 9.5 kPa), age, sex, STS predicted morbidity and mortality, and baseline hemoglobin. After adjusting for included variables, LSM ≥ 9.5 kPa was associated with lower odds of early discharge as compared to LSM < 9.5 kPa (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06-0.84, p = 0.03). The ROC curve and resulting AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.83) suggest the final multivariate model provides good discriminatory performance when predicting early discharge. Conclusions: A preoperative LSM ≥ 9.5 kPa ruled out a short length of stay in nearly 80% of patients when compared to patients with a LSM < 9.5 kPa. Preoperative liver stiffness may be a useful metric to incorporate into preoperative risk stratification.

The Impact of Metabolic Health and Obesity on Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients

Poor metabolic health and obesity have significant impacts on the outcomes of patients suffering from chronic liver disease, particularly those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Patients with such comorbidities who require liver transplant evaluation for advancing liver disease or liver failure require special consideration due to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, sarcopenic obesity, and cancer. Those who have had a history of prior bariatric surgery pose specific anatomical constraints and may also be at increased risk of alcohol use disorder. Pre-operative risk assessment as well as strict control of metabolic risk factors are essential to reduce intra-operative and post-liver transplant complications. As immunosuppressive therapy exacerbates metabolic dysfunction and risk for cancer, post-liver transplant care must focus on balancing the need to prevent rejection and the impact of progressive metabolic dysfunction in this unique, but growing, patient population.

Perioperative proximal splenic artery embolization in cirrhotic patients with splenomegaly

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of proximal splenic artery embolization (SAE) in cirrhotic patients with splenomegaly who underwent surgical laparotomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 8 cirrhotic patients with splenomegaly. They underwent proximal SAE before- (n = 6) or after (n = 2) laparotomy. Vascular plugs or coils were placed in the proximal splenic artery. The diameter of the portal vein and the splenic volume were recorded. Clinical outcome assessments included platelet counts, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and complications.

RESULTS

After embolization, the portal venous diameter was significantly smaller (pre: 13.6 ± 2.7 mm, post: 12.5 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.023), the splenic volume was significantly decreased (pre: 463.2 ± 145.7 ml, post: 373.3 ± 108.5 ml, p = 0.008) and the platelet count was significantly higher (pre: 69.6 ± 30.8 × 103/μl, post: 86.8 ± 27.7 × 103/μl, p = 0.035). Before embolization, the median MELD score was 12; after embolization, it was 11 (p = 0.026). No patient developed post-treatment complications after embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction of hypersplenism by perioperative proximal SAE may be safe and reduce the surgical risk in cirrhotic patients with splenomegaly.

Risk stratification for isolated tricuspid valve surgery assisted using the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score

OBJECTIVE

Isolated tricuspid valve surgery is perceived as high-risk. This perception is nurtured by patients who often present with substantial liver dysfunction, which is inappropriately reflected in current surgical risk scores (eg, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] score has no specific tricuspid model). The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has was developed as a measure for the severity of liver dysfunction. We report scores and outcomes for our patient population.

METHODS

We calculated STS, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II (ESII), and MELD scores for all of our patients who received isolated tricuspid valve surgery between 2011 and 2020 (n = 157). We determined the MELD score, stratified patients into 3 groups (MELD <10: low, n = 53; 10 to <20: intermediate, n = 78; ≥20: high, n = 26) and describe associated outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients were 72 ± 10 years old and 43% were male. Mean STS score was 4.9 ± 3.5% and ESII was 7.2 ± 6.6%. Mortality was 8.9% at 30 days and 65% at latest follow-up (95% CI, 51%-76%). Median follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 0-9.7 years). Although ESII and STS score accurately predicted 30-day mortality at low MELD scores (observed to expected [O/E] for ESII score = 0.8 and O/E for STS score = 1.0) and intermediate MELD (O/E for ESII score = 0.7, O/E for STS score = 1.0), mortality was underestimated at high MELD (O/E for ESII score = 3.0, O/E for STS score = 4.7). This subgroup also had higher incidence of new-onset hemodialysis. Besides MELD category, recent congestive heart failure, endocarditis, and hemodialysis were also associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

For isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation, classic surgical risk stratification with STS or ESII scores failed to predict perioperative mortality if there was evidence of severe liver dysfunction. Preoperative MELD assessment might be useful to assist in proper risk assessment for isolated tricuspid valve surgery.

Impact of cardiac and noncardiac cirrhosis on coronary revascularization outcomes from the National Inpatient Sample, 2016 to 2018

Data on coronary revascularization in patients with cirrhosis are scarce because it is often deferred in the setting of significant comorbidities and coagulopathies. It is unknown whether patients with cardiac cirrhosis have a worse prognosis. The National Inpatient Sample was surveyed to identify patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from 2016 to 2018. Those with and without liver cirrhosis were propensity score-matched and compared within the PCI and CABG cohorts. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Patients with cirrhosis were further classified into cardiac and noncardiac cirrhosis and their in-hospital mortalities were compared. A total of 1,069,730 PCIs and 273,715 CABGs were performed for ACS, of which 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, were performed in patients with cirrhosis. In both the PCI cohort (odds ratio = 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.25; P = 0.01) and the CABG cohort (odds ratio = 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-4.62; P = 0.01), cirrhosis was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality was greatest in cardiac cirrhosis (8.4% and 7.1%), followed by noncardiac cirrhosis (5.5% and 5.0%) and no cirrhosis (2.6% and 2.3%) in PCI and CABG cohorts, respectively. Higher in-hospital mortality and periprocedural morbidities should be considered when performing coronary revascularization in patients with cirrhosis.

Association of liver dysfunction with outcomes after cardiac surgery-a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of studies reporting outcomes in patients with liver dysfunction addressed by the model of end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify contemporary studies reporting short- and long-term outcomes in patients with liver dysfunction compared to patients with no or mild liver dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery (stratified in high and low score group based on the study cut-offs). Primary outcome was perioperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were perioperative neurological events, prolonged ventilation, sepsis, bleeding and/or need for transfusion, acute kidney injury and long-term mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies with 48 891 patients were included. Compared with the low score group, being in the high score group was associated with significantly higher risk of perioperative mortality [odds ratio (OR) 3.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.75-5.03, P < 0.001]. High score group was also associated with a significantly higher rate of perioperative neurological events (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71, P < 0.001), prolonged ventilation (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.94-3.09, P < 0.001), sepsis (OR 3.88, 95% CI 2.07-7.26, P < 0.001), bleeding and/or need for transfusion (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.43-2.64, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.12-6.98, P < 0.001) and long-term mortality (incidence risk ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.46, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis suggests that liver dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is independently associated with higher risk of short and long-term mortality and also with an increased occurrence of various perioperative adverse events.

Approach to the patient with decompensated cirrhosis and aortic stenosis during liver transplantation evaluation

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease and is reported to be present in 2%-7% of people over the age of 65. Risk factors for aortic stenosis and NASH overlap; thus, as the population ages, there is an increased likelihood that patients undergoing liver transplantation evaluation may have severe aortic stenosis. There is a high mortality rate associated with cardiac surgeries in patients with cirrhosis. Further, there are no guidelines that assist in the decision making process for patients with cirrhosis and AS. In this review, we highlight key studies that compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with cirrhosis. We propose an algorithm as to how to approach the patient with aortic stenosis and considerations unique to patients with cirrhosis (i.e., anticoagulation, EGD for variceal assessment; need to determine timing after TAVI before listing).

CABG in patients with liver cirrhosis: to pump or not to pump?

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with established liver cirrhosis is generally associated with poor outcomes. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in these patients has not demonstrated any advantage over the use of CPB. We review the current available literature that compared the outcome of both on-pump (ONCABG) and off-pump (OPCAB) techniques in cirrhotic patients in terms of morbidity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in January 2021. Articles that reported outcomes of OPCAB and/or ONCABG in cirrhotic patients with no concomitant surgical procedures were included. 829 unique abstracts were retrieved with title and abstract screening completed independently by two reviewers. Two case studies and six retrospective cohort studies were included. The largest study comprised more than 98% of the total population, showing some survival benefit for OPCAB over ONCABG. However, it was population-based and did not report the severity of liver. The remaining studies reported no clear difference in outcome between the two techniques.

EXPERT OPINION

: Surgical myocardial revascularisation carries high peri-operative risk in patients with liver cirrhosis irrespective of the surgical technique. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that avoiding CPB in these patients may be beneficial.

Predictive value of aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio for contrast-associated acute kidney injury in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Pre-procedure liver insufficiency has been demonstrated as a poor prognostic factor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent research discovered that the aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (De-Ritis ratio) reflects the severity of liver insufficiency and was associated with adverse outcomes. We aim to evaluate the predictive value of the De-Ritis ratio for contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) and long-term mortality in patients undergoing elective PCI.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 5780 consenting patients undergoing elective PCI between January 2012 and December 2018. CA-AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dl or ≥50% within 48 h after the administration of contrast media.

RESULTS

The incidence of CA-AKI was 6.3% (n = 363). The De-Ritis ratio >1.30 was identified as the best cut-off value for CA-AKI prediction. The De-Ritis ratio showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.636 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.605-0.667] in predicting CA-AKI, which was significantly greater than alanine aminotransferase (p<0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.012) alone. Furthermore, compared to currently recognized liver function assessment tools, the predictive value of the De-Ritis ratio on CA-AKI was similar to the MELD score (AUC: 0.636 vs 0.626, p = 0.631) and higher than the MELD-XI score (AUC: 0.636 vs 0.561, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the De-Ritis ratio >1.30 was independently associated with CA-AKI (odds ratio=1.551, 95% CI: 1.185-2.030, p = 0.001). The addition of the De-Ritis ratio to the fully adjusted logistic regression model has significant incremental effects on the risk prediction for CA-AKI with a continuous net reclassification improvement of 0.395 (p<0.001) and an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.005 (p = 0.018). Additionally, the De-Ritis ratio >1.30 was significantly associated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio=1.285, 95% CI: 1.007-1.641, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The De-Ritis ratio was an independent risk factor for CA-AKI and long-term mortality in patients undergoing elective PCI.

Outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with liver cirrhosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used for life support in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). However, there have been no studies evaluating the outcome of ECMO support in patients with LC.

METHODS

Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) database, we retrospectively evaluated patients with LC who received veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2013. The outcomes included ECMO-related complications, in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality and long-term outcomes in patients with and without LC.

RESULTS

A total of 7003 patients who received ECMO, of whom 233 (3.3%) had LC, were eligible for analysis. The LC patients who received ECMO support had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality than the non-LC group (76.4% vs 60.7%; odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.70). The LC group also had a higher risk of complications, including de novo dialysis and massive blood transfusion with >10 units of red blood cells. Patients ≥65 years of age, patients with respiratory disease, patients with hypoalbuminaemia and liver transplant patients had higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality. The mortality rates for patients with 2 or more risk factors were 90.3% and 95.8%, respectively. LC was associated with a higher incidence of all-cause mortality and liver-related outcomes during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings raise questions regarding the utility of ECMO for LC patients, especially when >2 risk factors have been identified. ECMO support for LC patients should be used with caution and with careful patient selection.

Successful Radical Pericardiectomy for Porcelain Constrictive Pericarditis

We report the case of a patient with severely calcified constrictive pericarditis and liver cirrhosis who underwent successful off-pump radical pericardiectomy. The cardiac parameters significantly improved without severe complications. We demonstrate the usefulness of off-pump surgical treatment for constrictive pericarditis with liver cirrhosis. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Effect of medications after cardiac surgery on long-term outcomes in patients with cirrhosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) after cardiac surgery in the liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2001 to 2013. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and liver and renal outcomes. Among 1470 LC patients, 35.6% (n = 524) received beta-blockers and 33.4% (n = 491) were prescribed ACEIs and/or ARBs after cardiac surgery. The risk of negative liver outcomes was significantly lower in the ARB group compared with the ACEI group (9.6% vs 22.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.83). Furthermore, the risk of MACCE (44.2% vs 54.7%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96), all-cause mortality (35.3% vs 46.4%, HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.92), composite liver outcomes (9.6% vs 16.5%, HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.85) and hepatic encephalopathy (2.7% vs 5.7%, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.94) were lower in the ARB group than the control group. Our study demonstrated that ARBs provide a greater protective effect than ACEIs in regard to long-term outcomes following cardiac surgery in patients with LC.

Perioperative Evaluation and Management of Patients With Cirrhosis: Risk Assessment, Surgical Outcomes, and Future Directions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. We provide a narrative review of the available data regarding perioperative morbidity and mortality, risk assessment, and management of patients with cirrhosis undergoing non-hepatic surgical procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature from 1998-2018 and identified 87 studies reporting perioperative outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. We extracted elements of study design and perioperative mortality by surgical procedure, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reported in these 87 studies to support our narrative review.

RESULTS

Overall, perioperative mortality is 2-10 times higher in patients with cirrhosis compared to patients without cirrhosis, depending on the severity of liver dysfunction. For elective procedures, patients with compensated cirrhosis (CTP class A, or MELD <10) have minimal increase in operative mortality. CTP class C patients (or MELD >15) are at high risk for mortality; liver transplantation or alternatives to surgery should be considered. Very little data exist to guide perioperative management of patients with cirrhosis, so most recommendations are based on case series and expert opinion. Existing risk calculators are inadequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of liver dysfunction, medical comorbidities and the type and complexity of surgery, including whether it is elective versus emergent, are all determinants of perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients with cirrhosis. There are major limitations to the existing clinical research on risk assessment and perioperative management that warrant further investigation.

Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis (CASTER) Study: Early and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) undergoing cardiac surgery (CS) face perioperative high mortality and morbidity, but extensive studies on this topic are lacking.

METHODS

All adult patients with LC undergoing a CS procedure between 2000 and 2017 at 10 Italian Institutions were included in this retrospective cohort study. LC was classified according to preoperative Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Early-term and medium-term outcomes analysis was performed in the overall population and according to CTP classes.

RESULTS

The study population included 144 patients (mean age 66 ± 9 years, 69% male). Ninety-eight, 20, and 26 patients were in CTP class A, in early CTP class B (MELD score <12), or advanced CTP class B (MELD score >12), respectively. The main LC etiologies were viral (43%) and alcoholic (36%). Liver-related clinical presentation (ascites, esophageal varices, and encephalopathy) and laboratory values (estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum albumin, and bilirubin, platelet count) significantly worsened across the CTP classes (P = .001). Coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery (87% bioprosthesis) were performed in 36% and 50%, respectively. Postoperative complications (especially acute kidney injury, liver complication, and length of stay) significantly worsened in advanced CTP class B (P = .001). Notably, observed mortality was 3-fold or 4-fold higher than the EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) II-predicted mortality, in the overall population, and in the subgroups. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year and 5-year cumulative survival in the overall population was 82% ± 3% and 77% ± 4%, respectively. The 5-year survival in CTP class A, early CTP class B, and advanced CTP class B was 72% ± 5%, 68% ± 11%, and 61% ± 10%, respectively (P = .238).

CONCLUSIONS

CS outcomes in patients with LC are significantly affected in relation to the extent of preoperative liver dysfunction, but in early CTP classes, medium-term survival is acceptable. Further analysis are needed to better estimate the preoperative risk stratification of these patients.

Preoperative Evaluation and Anesthetic Management of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Preoperative evaluation and anesthetic management of patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing cardiac surgery remain a clinical challenge because of its high risk for perioperative complications. This narrative review article summarizes the pathophysiology and anesthetic implication of liver cirrhosis on each organ system. It will help physicians to evaluate surgical candidates, to optimize intraoperative management, and to anticipate complications in liver cirrhosis patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Morbidity typically results from bleeding, sepsis, multisystem organ failure, or hepatic insufficiency. These complications occur as a result of the presence of coagulopathy, poor nutritional status, immune dysfunction, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, and renal and pulmonary dysfunction that occur with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, liver cirrhosis should not be seen as a single disease, but one that manifests with multiorgan dysfunction. Cardiac surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis increases the risk of perioperative complications, and it presents a particular challenge to the anesthesiologist in that nearly every aspect of normally functioning physiology may be jeopardized in a unique way. Accurately classifying the extent of liver disease, preoperative optimization, and surgical risk communication with the patient are crucial. In addition, all teams involved in the surgery should communicate openly and coordinate in order to ensure optimal care. To reduce perioperative complications, consider using off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass techniques and optimal perfusion modalities to mimic current physiologic conditions.

The impact of cirrhosis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective observational cohort study

PURPOSE

Patients with cirrhosis and concomitant coronary/valvular heart disease present a clinical dilemma. The therapeutic outcome of major cardiac surgery is significantly poorer in patients with cirrhosis compared with patients without cirrhosis. To address this, we aimed to identify associations between the severity of cirrhosis and post-cardiac surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A historical cohort analysis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the University of Alberta Hospital from January 2004 to December 2014 was used to identify and propensity score-match 60 patients with cirrhosis to 310 patients without cirrhosis. The relationships between cirrhosis and i) mortality, ii) postoperative complications, and iii) requirement of healthcare resources were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten-year mortality was significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared with propensity score-matched non-cirrhotic patients (40% vs 20%; relative risk [RR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 2.9; P = 0.001). Cirrhotic patients had more complications (63% vs 48%; RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.7; P = 0.02), longer median [interquartile range (IQR)] intensive care unit stays (5 [3-11] vs 2 [1-4] days; P < 0.001), time on mechanical ventilation (median [IQR] 2 [1-5] vs 1 [0.5-1.2] days; P < 0.001) and more frequently required renal replacement therapy (15% vs 6%; RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2; P = 0.02) postoperatively. After adjusting for other covariates, presence of cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.1) and intraoperative transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.3) were independently associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Despite having low median model for end-stage liver disease scores, this small series of cirrhotic patients undergoing cardiac surgery had significantly higher mortality rates and required more organ support postoperatively than propensity score-matched non-cirrhotic patients. Impact de la cirrhose chez les patients subissant une chirurgie cardiaque : une étude de cohorte observationnelle et rétrospective.

Does liver cirrhosis lead to inferior outcomes following cardiac surgery?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: Do patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing cardiac surgery have inferior clinical outcomes? Altogether, 1627 papers were found using the reported search, of which 8 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that these studies demonstrate that cirrhotic patients have significantly poorer clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery than would be predicted by conventional risk scoring systems. This includes both in-hospital mortality and rates of major complications (bleeding, cardiac, infective, renal and respiratory), which would likely lead to an increased hospital length of stay and, therefore, an associated cost. Evidence supports that the Model for End-stage Liver Disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh cirrhosis severity scoring systems can be used to stratify risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing cardiac surgery and should be considered for inclusion in future cardiac surgery risk scoring systems.

Frequency of Complications Including Death from Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis

Advanced liver disease is a risk factor for cardiac surgery. However, liver dysfunction is not included in cardiac risk assessment models. We sought to identify trends in utilization, complications, and outcomes of patients with cirrhosis who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients with cirrhosis who underwent CABG from 2002 to 2014. Propensity-score matching was used to identify differences in in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in cirrhosis and noncirrhosis patients. We identified a total of 698,799 CABG admissions of which 2,231 (0.3%) had cirrhosis (mean age 63.6 ± 9.6 years, 74% men, 63% white, mean Charlson co-morbidity index 3.3 ± 1.8). Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 71% of patients. Mean length of stay was 13.7 ± 11.4 days and hospitalization cost $67,744.6 ± 58,320.4. One or more complications occurred in 44% of cases. After propensity-score matching, patients with cirrhosis had a higher rate of complications (43.9% vs 38.93%; p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (7.2% vs 4.07%; p < 0.001) than noncirrhosis patients. On multivariate analysis, cirrhosis and ascites were associated with increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.87; 95% confidence intervals 2.37 to 3.48) and postoperative complications (odds ratio 5.11; 95% confidence intervals 3.88 to 6.72). In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis constitute a small portion of patients who underwent CABG in the United States but have a higher rate of complications and in-hospital mortality compared with noncirrhosis patients. In-hospital mortality remains high for this subset of patients but has decreased in recent years.

A population-based analysis of endovascular aortic stent graft therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are effective and minimally invasive treatments for high-risk surgical candidates. However, information about the management of EVAR and TEVAR in liver cirrhosis (LC) is lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate outcomes after EVAR and TEVAR in patients with LC.

METHODS

Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent EVAR and TEVAR therapy between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients with LC and 730 matched patients without LC were eligible for analysis after propensity score matching. In-hospital mortality and perioperative complications were not statistically significantly different between the two cohorts, although the LC group had an increased volume of blood transfusion and a trend toward a lower survival rate (P of stratified Cox = .092). However, patients with LC had a higher adjusted hazard ratio for death (1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.12; P < .001) in the sensitivity analysis by traditional multivariable adjustment. The LC cohort had a higher risk of liver-related death (4.1% vs 0.7%; P = .001) and liver-related readmission (6.2% vs 0.3%; P < .001). As expected, the advanced LC group had a higher mortality rate than the early LC group (P = .022). The risk for reintervention, redo open aortic surgery (P = .859), and redo stent graft therapy (P = .179) was not statistically significantly different between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term results after EVAR and TEVAR are promising in patients with LC, despite poor long-term outcomes, because of the nature of LC. Innovations in endovascular therapy for aortic disease have improved surgical outcomes, even in high-risk patients with LC.

Impact of Cirrhosis in Patients Who Underwent Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Cirrhosis is known to adversely affect cardiac surgery outcomes. Our objective was to quantify the morbidity, mortality, and cost that cirrhosis adds to surgical aortic valve replacement. From 1998 to 2011, 423,789 patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Healthcare Cost Utilization Project underwent isolated aortic valve replacement; 2,769 (0.7%) had cirrhosis. Multivariable linear regression and 1:1 propensity matching were used to determine the effect of cirrhosis on postsurgical outcomes. The number of patients with cirrhosis who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement per year more than tripled during the 13-year study period. Patients with cirrhosis were more likely to be younger (p <0.0001), insured by Medicaid (p <0.0001), and operated on at an academic or high-volume hospital (p <0.05). Risk-adjusted mortality for patients with cirrhosis was 16%, compared with 5% for patients without cirrhosis. Risk factors for death included congestive heart failure, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, pulmonary circulation disorders, and weight loss. Among propensity-matched pairs, patients with cirrhosis had a higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.6), risk of any complication [OR 1.5], and acute renal failure (OR 2.2). There was no increased risk of stroke, wound infection, blood transfusion, or pneumonia. The risk-adjusted length of stay (15 vs 12 days) and cost ($68,000 vs 56,000) were higher in patients with cirrhosis. In conclusion, the presence of cirrhosis poses a significant risk of death in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. When performed, the cost and length of stay are increased compared with those without cirrhosis.

Impact of prior coronary stenting on the outcome of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

The percentage of patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) who have previously undergone percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) is increasing. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who had received coronary stenting before CABG, and to examine the validity of a mortality risk stratification system in this patient group.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2012, 439 patients who underwent isolated CABG at our medical center were reviewed. The patients were divided into two study groups: those who had previously received coronary artery stenting (97 patients, 24.7%), and those who had not (342 patients, 75.3%). The patients who received balloon angioplasty were excluded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The prior stenting group had a lower risk of mortality, although the difference was not significant. The prior stenting group had fewer graft anastomoses (p = 0.005), and hence a significantly shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.045) and shorter aortic cross-clamping time. Surgical mortality was similar between the two groups. The durations of intensive care unit stay and hospitalization were also similar. The discriminatory power of the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) was lower in both group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior coronary stenting does not affect short-term mortality in patients subsequently undergoing CABG surgery. The EuroSCORE does not predict perioperative mortality well for the patients who undergo coronary stenting before CABG.

Long-Term Outcome of Cardiac Surgery in 1,040 Liver Cirrhosis Patient - Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) have a higher risk for cardiac surgery, but population-based long-term follow-up studies are lacking. The aim of this study was therefore to validate the long-term outcome of cardiac surgery in patients with LC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were obtained from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database, 1997-2011. This study included 1,040 LC patients and 1,040 matched controls without LC. The actuarial survival rate at 1, 5 and 10 years in the LC cohort was 68%, 50% and 41%: significantly lower than that of the control cohort at 81%, 68% and 62% at 1, 5 and 10 years after cardiac surgery. Compared with the matched control cohort, the LC group had a higher risk of liver and heart failure readmission (P<0.001) during the follow-up period. In addition, the LC cohort had a higher risk of liver causes of death than did the control cohort (12.6% vs. 1.2%). In the LC cohort, 51% of deaths were due to hepatocellular carcinoma. And in the LC group, those with valve surgery and advanced cirrhosis had a lower survival rate (P=0.002, P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Even after successful cardiac surgery, long-term outcome is unsatisfactory in LC patients because of the progressive deterioration of liver function.

Current Expectations for Cardiac Transplantation in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

Congenital heart disease accounts for 40% of pediatric heart transplants and presents unique challenges to the transplant team. Suitability for transplantation is defined in part by degree of sensitization, pulmonary vascular resistance, and hepatic reserves. The incremental transplant risk for patients with congenital heart disease occurs within the first 3 months, after which survival is equivalent to transplantation for cardiomyopathy. Single ventricle with prior palliation, and especially the failing Fontan, carry the highest risk for transplantation and are least amenable to bridging with mechanical circulatory support. More effective bridging to transplant with mechanical circulatory support will require improvements in the adverse event profile of available pumps and the introduction of miniaturized continuous flow technology. The major barriers to routine long-term survival are chronic allograft failure and allograft vasculopathy. Despite these many challenges, continuing improvements in the care of pediatric heart transplant patients have pushed the median posttransplant survival past 15 years for children and to 20 years for infants.