Unexpected lymph node disease in resections for pulmonary metastases

Role of Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer

Pulmonary metastasectomy serves as the most efficacious local therapeutic option for stage IV colorectal cancer that has spread to the lungs. In order to properly select patients who will benefit most from pulmonary metastasectomy over other therapeutic options, a multidisciplinary approach should be utilized. The ideal technique is parenchymal-sparing, especially given that there is a high recurrence rate with the most common location being the remainder of the lung. While benefits of pulmonary metastatsectomy are well-documented, further studies are warranted to continue to refine patient selection, timing of surgery, and interplay with other treatment modalities.

The Case for Pulmonary Metastasectomy-Clinical Practice Narrative Review and Commentary

Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a well-established procedure for patients with certain types of solid tumors. Patients are usually scheduled for staged lung metastasectomy in case of primary tumor control, the absence of distant non-lung metastases, and when complete resection is achievable. Nodules are removed with precision resection in order to ensure radical resection with minimal margins; this technique permits good oncological results, preserving the surrounding pulmonary parenchyma and causing minimal distortion compared to staplers. When possible, anatomical resections should be avoided since they are not justified by real oncological advantages and, in the majority of cases, sacrifice too much healthy tissue, possibly leading to inoperability in the case of metachronous relapses. Thus, preserving the maximum amount of pulmonary parenchyma is crucial because repeated metastasectomies are possible and frequent, with no theoretical limits to the number of reinterventions. In our multidisciplinary board team, we support the role of pulmonary metastasectomy as a useful curative therapy, with acceptable morbidity and mortality, with indications to be discussed case-by-case.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy

The lung represents the most common site for metastatic spread of extrathoracic primary malignancies. Pulmonary metastatic disease occurs in a wide breadth of cancers with a multitude of histologies, and, historically, has been managed predominantly with systemic therapy. However, in appropriately selected patients, pulmonary metastasectomy can provide extended disease-free intervals, relief from systemic therapy, and prolonged survival. Thus, pulmonary metastasectomy serves a vital role in the armamentarium against a multitude of primary malignancies. Moreover, as systemic agents improve and more patients live longer with stage IV cancer, pulmonary metastasectomy will likely have increasing relevance in the future.

Oncologic Outcome after Pulmonary Metastasectomy as Part of Multidisciplinary Treatment in a Tertiary Oncological Center

(1) Background: Pulmonary metastases are encountered in approximately one-third of patients with malignancies, especially from colorectal, lung, breast, and renal cancers, and sarcomas. Pulmonary metastasectomy is the ablative approach of choice, when possible, as part of the multidisciplinary effort to integrate and personalize the oncological treatment. (2) Methods: The study includes 58 consecutive cases of pulmonary metastasectomies, retrospectively analyzed, performed in 12 consecutive months, in which the pathology reports confirmed lung metastases. (3) Results: Most frequent pathological types of metastases were: 14 of colorectal cancer, 10 breast, 8 lung, and 8 sarcomas. At the time of primary cancer diagnosis, 14 patients (24.14%) were in the metastatic stage. The surgical approach was minimally invasive through uniportal VATS (Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery) in 3/4 of cases (43 patients, 74%). Almost 20% of resections were typical (lobectomy, segmentectomy). Lymphadenectomy was associated in almost 1/2 of patients and lymph node metastases were found in 11.11% of cases. The mortality rate (intraoperative and 90 days postoperative) is zero. The OS after pulmonary metastasectomy is 87% at 18 months, and the estimated OS for cancer is 90% at 5 years. The worst outcome presents the patients with sarcomas and the best outcome-colorectal and lung cancer. The patients with 1 or 2 resected metastases presented 96% survival at 24 months. (4) Conclusions: After pulmonary metastasectomy, survival is favored by the small number of metastases resected (1 or 2), and by the dimension of metastases under 20.5 mm. The non-anatomic (wedge) type of lung resection may present a lower risk of death compared to lobectomy. No statistical significance on survival has the presence of lymphadenectomy, the laterality right/left lung, the upper/lower lobes. In the future, longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are needed for drawing definitive conclusions.

The prognostic effect of lymph node dissection in secondary lung tumor metastasectomies

Background: In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of lymph node dissection in secondary lung tumor metastasectomies.

Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2015, a total of 201 patients (122 males, 79 females; mean age: of 41.4±19.2 years; range, 3 to 79 years) who had pulmonary metastasectomy due to colorectal carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and soft tissue - skeletal sarcomas were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological features of the patients, overall survival, and complication rates according to the presence of lymph node dissection were evaluated.

Results: The most common histopathological subtype was a sarcoma in 118 (58.7%) patients, followed by colorectal carcinoma in 63 (31.3%) patients, and renal cell carcinoma in 20 (10%) patients. A total of 88 (43.7%) patients underwent systematic lymph node dissection with pulmonary metastasectomy. The mean overall survival of patients with and without lymph node dissection were 49±5.9 (95% confidence interval 37.3-60.6) and 26±4.4 (95% confidence interval 17.2-34.7) months, respectively (p=0.003). The five-year survival rates in colorectal carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma were 52%, 30%, and 23%, respectively (p=0.002). Locoregional recurrences occurred in 15 (35.7%) patients in the lymph node dissection group and in 23 (60.5%) patients in the non-lymph node dissection group (p=0.026). Lymph node dissection did not show a significant relationship regarding to postoperative complications (p=0.09).

Conclusion: Lymph node dissection following pulmonary metastasectomy may improve the overall survival and reduce locoregional recurrence, without any increase in morbidity and mortality.

Lymphadenectomy in pulmonary metastasectomy

Lymph node (LN) removal during pulmonary metastasectomy is a prerequisite to achieve complete resection or at least collect prognostic information, but is not yet generally accepted. On average, the rate of unexpected lymph node involvement (LNI) is less than 10% in sarcoma, 20% in colorectal cancer (CRC) and 30% in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) when radical LN dissection is performed. LNI is a negative prognostic factor and presence of preoperative mediastinal disease usually leads to exclusion of the patient from metastasis surgery. Nonetheless, some authors found excellent prognoses even with mediastinal LNI in colorectal and RCC metastases when radical LN dissection was performed (median survival of 37 and 36 months, respectively). Multiple metastases, central location of the lesion followed by anatomical resections are associated with a higher LNI rate. The real prognostic influence of systematic LN dissection remains unclear. Two positive effects were described after radical lymphadenectomy: a trend for improved survival in RCC patients and a reduction of mediastinal recurrences from 23% to 0% in CRC patients. Unfortunately, there is a great number of studies that do not demonstrate any positive effect of lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy except a pseudo stage migration effect. Future studies should not only focus on survival, but also on local and LN recurrence.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for the treatment of oligometastatic lung disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerance between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgery for the treatment of oligometastatic lung disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed patients treated in two institutions for up to 5 pulmonary metastases with a maximal diameter of 4cm and without associated pleural involvement or thoracic lymphadenopathy. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment outcome, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and pulmonary or local tumor progression rates.

RESULTS

Among 204 patients identified, 78 patients (42 men, 36 women; mean age, 53.3±14.9 [SD]; age range: 15-81 years) were treated surgically, while 126 patients (59 men, 67 women; mean age, 62.2±10.8 [SD]; age range: 33-80 years) were treated by RFA. In the RFA cohort, patients were significantly older (P<0.0001), with more extra-thoracic localisation (P=0.015) and bilateral tumour burden (P=0.0014). In comparison between surgery and RFA cohorts, respectively, the 1- and 3-year OS were 94.8 and 67.2% vs. 94 and 72.1% (P=0.46), the 1- and 3-year PFS were 49.4% and 26.1% vs. 38.9% and 14.8% (P=0.12), the pulmonary progression rates were 39.1% and 56% vs. 41.2% and 65.3% (P>0.99), and the local tumour progression rates were 5.4% and 10.6% vs. 4.8% and 18.6% (P=0.07). Tumour size>2cm was associated with a significantly higher local tumor progression in the RFA group (P=0.010). Hospitalisation stay was significantly shorter in the RFA group (median of 3 days; IQR=2 days; range: 2-12 days) than in the surgery group (median of 9 days; IQR=2 days; range: 6-21 days) (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

RFA should be considered a minimally-invasive alternative with similar OS and PFS to surgery in the treatment of solitary or multiple lung metastases measuring less than 4cm in diameter without associated pleural involvement or thoracic lymphadenopathy.

Current Indications for Pulmonary Metastasectomy

The lung is one of the most common sites of metastatic disease. Assessing patients for pulmonary metastasectomy includes ensuring they are suitable surgical candidates for single-lung ventilation and pulmonary resection. Complete resection of metastases and control of primary tumor and oligometastatic disease are key tenets for metastasectomy. Negative prognostic factors include short disease-free interval, presence of lymphadenopathy, and multiple lesions. Primary tumors are associated with excellent outcomes. With modern high-resolution scans, minimally invasive approaches to metastasectomy are preferred. Consideration of extended resections should take place in a multidisciplinary manner. Nonoperative options include stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation.

Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery sufficient for lymph node dissection in pulmonary metastasectomy?

AIM

We evaluated the results of patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and aimed to investigate postoperative lymph node positivity after lymph node dissection (PM-LND).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection with VATS between March 2015 and March 2020 in our clinic were included in the study.

RESULTS

The mean age of 58 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection with VATS was 56.5. Thirty-four of the patients were female and 24 were male. A total of 61 surgical procedures, 3 of which were bilateral, were performed in 58 patients. The mean number of resected pulmonary metastases was 1.72. The total number of dissected lymph nodes was 191, with an average of 3.1 per surgical procedure. Colon carcinoma (20 patients) and breast carcinoma (16 patients) were the most common primary tumor origin. Others were thyroid, sarcoma, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Unexpected lymph node positivity was present in 9 of 58 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a technique that can be applied in pulmonary metastasectomy with its advantages such as a low complication rate and rapid recovery. In these patients, lymph node dissection, which is one of the determining factors of prognosis, can be performed effectively with VATS. Mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection combined with pulmonary metastasectomy is effective in detecting unexpected lymph node positivity.

Surgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of pulmonary metastases. A systematic review of literature

It is not clear as to which is the best treatment among surgery and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung oligometastases. A systematic review of literature with a priori selection criteria was conducted on articles on the treatment of pulmonary metastases with surgery or SBRT. Only original articles with a population of patients of more than 50 were selected. After final selection, 61 articles on surgical treatment and 18 on SBRT were included. No difference was encountered in short-term survival between pulmonary metastasectomy and SBRT. In the long-term surgery seems to guarantee better survival rates. Mortality and morbidity after treatment are 0–4.7% and 0–23% for surgery, and 0–2% and 4–31% for SBRT. Surgical metastasectomy remains the treatment of choice for pulmonary oligometastases.

Patients with metastatic cancer with a limited number of deposits may benefit from surgical removal or irradiation of tumor nodules in addiction to chemotherapy. Surgical resection has been demonstrated to improve survival and, in some cases, can be curative. Stereotactic radiotherapy is emerging as a less invasive alternative to surgery, but settings and implications of the two treatments are profoundly different. The two techniques show similar results in the short-term, with lower complications rates for radiotherapy, while in the long-term surgery seems to guarantee higher survival rates.

Precision surgery in lung metastasectomy

The value of pulmonary metastasis (PM) resection in the context of controlled primary tumor sites was shown to improve survival of patients if complete resection could be achieved. The surgeon's approach can be modulated by various parameters pertaining to safety margins including local growth properties, size, spread and location of PMs. Lymph node dissection and assessment is recommended although its impact on survival remains unclear. Thoracoscopic surgery combined to thin slice chest CT scans has shown results comparable to thoracotomy in patients with few PMs. The management of PMs should therefore be discussed on an individual, interdisciplinary basis to offer the best possible oncological and surgical results as well as to maximize long term patient survival rates.

[Rationale of thoracic lymph node dissection in pulmonary metastasectomy]

The goal of metastasectomy is a R0 resection. Depending of the tumor entity the prevalence of lymph node metastases in pulmonary metastasectomy can be up to 45%; however, systematic lymph node dissection is not yet established as a fixed component of metastasectomy. Although there is a high prevalence of lymph node metastases and the increase in the prevalence with a higher number of lung metastases, it remains unclear if a systematic lymph node dissection should be part of pulmonary metastasectomy. For this reason, the goal of this review was to evaluate the rationale of systematic lymph node dissection in pulmonary metastasectomy based on the currently available literature. Furthermore, it was investigated whether patients with additional thoracic lymph node metastases should be excluded per se from pulmonary metastasectomy, even though positive lymph node metastases might be associated with a lower but nevertheless good long-term survival after resection.

Long-term Outcome After Resection of Isolated Thoracic Lymph Node Metastases of Renal Cell Cancer

BACKGROUND

Isolated thoracic lymph node metastases (ITLNMs) without any lung metastases of renal cell cancer are rare. Other than a few case reports and one study, there is no further literature on ITLNMs. For this reason, the goal of this study was to analyze our experiences, the long-term survival outcomes, and recurrence-free survival outcomes after the resection of ITLNMs.

METHODS

We analyzed our database of 15 patients with ITLNMs who underwent metastasectomy by systematic lymph node dissection from 2003 to 2017. The long-term outcomes and survival curves were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median disease-free interval between primary cancer and ITLNM was 40 months (range, 0-171 months). The R0 resection rate was 93.3% (n = 14). There was one R2 resection, which was due to a tracheal and left main bronchial infiltration. The postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 13.3% and 0%, respectively. Altogether, 14 patients were included in the long-term follow-up with a median follow-up time of 35.5 months (range, 2-108 months). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 93%, 73%, and 73%, respectively. The median overall progression-free survival after metastasectomy was 18 months (95% confidence interval, 8.6-27.4 months), and the 5-year local recurrence-free rate was 65%.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the long disease-free interval between primary cancer and ITLNM, a long oncologic follow-up that includes chest images should be mandatory. Altogether, metastasectomy of ITLNMs is feasible with low morbidity and mortality rates and might be associated with promising survival rates. Early detection and resection of ITLNMs may avoid severe complications.

Lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy: Impact on survival and recurrence

Background and Objectives: Lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is widely carried out. We assessed the potential benefit on patient survival and tumor recurrence of this practice.

Methods: One hundred eighty‐one patients undergoing a first PM were studied. Eighty‐six patients (47.5%) underwent lymphadenectomy (L+ group) whereas 95 (52.5%) did not undergo nodal harvesting (L−group). Main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS). Median follow‐up was 25 months (interquartile range [IQR], 13‐49).

Results: At follow‐up 84 patients (46.4%) died, whereas 97 (53.6%) were still alive with recurrence in 78 patients (43%). There was no difference in 5‐year survival (L+ 30.0% vs L− 43.2%; P = .87) or in the 5‐year cumulative incidence of recurrence (L + 63.2% vs L−80%; P = .07) between the two groups. Multivariable analysis indicated that disease‐free interval (DFI) less than 29 months (P < .001) and lung comorbidities (P = .003) were significant predictors of death. Metastases from non‐small–cell lung cancer increased the risk of lung comorbidities by a factor of 19.8, whereas the risk of DFI less than 29 months was increased nearly 11‐fold. Competing risk regression identified multiple metastases (P = .004), head/neck primary tumor (P = .009), and age less than 67 years (P = .024) as independent risk factors for recurrence.

Conclusion: Associated lymphadenectomy showed not to give any additional advantage in terms of survival and recurrence after PM.

[Influence of primary lymph node status of colorectal cancer on the development of pulmonary metastases and thoracic lymph node metastases]

BACKGROUND

The lungs are the second most common organ site for metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Lymph node metastasis of CRC represents a prognostic factor for survival.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the influence of CRC lymph node metastasis on lung metastasis, in particular thoracic lymph node metastasis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 88 patients (n = 56 male) with curative resection of lung metastases of CRC was performed. Primary endpoint: influence of lymph node status of CRC on lung metastases. Secondary endpoints: disease-free survival and overall survival. Statistical evaluation was carried out with SPSS.

RESULTS

In 48 patients a positive lymph node status of CRC and in 9 patients an N+ status of lung metastases were determined. The lymph node status of the CRC significantly affected the incidence of synchronous metastases (p = 0.03), disease-free interval until formation of metachronous lung metastases (p = 0.012) and the overall survival of patients with CRC (p = 0.048). The 5‑year survival rate for CRC patients with lung metastases was 48.7% after pulmonary metastasectomy. Thoracic lymph node involvement also significantly affected survival (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Screening for pulmonary metastases should be included in the staging and follow-up of all patients with CRC, especially in patients with a positive lymph node status of the CRC.

Surgical management of lung metastases

Management of pulmonary metastases has evolved considerably over the last few decades but is still controversial. The surgical management of lung metastases is outlined, discussing the preoperative management, indications for surgery, the surgical approach and outcomes according to the primary histology.

The predictive accuracy of sentinel nodes mapping in the setting of pulmonary metastasectomy

This is the first study to evaluate the feasibility of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) based on sentinel lymph node (SLN) status during pulmonary metastasectomy. A total of 22 patients (16 men, 6 women; age 63.3 ± 7.01 years) who were candidates for metastasectomy through segmentectomy or lobectomy with MLND owing to cancers metastatic to the lung were enrolled in this study. Radiotracer was administered at the peritumoral region before surgery or soon after initiating surgery. During the operation, the radioactivity of the lymph nodes (ex vivo) was counted with a handheld gamma probe after MLND. Lobectomy was performed in 17 patients, and segmentectomy, in 5 patients. The number of dissected lymph nodes per patient was 14.4 ± 8.69 (range, 5–36). In all patients, the SLN could be detected, and the number of SLNs identified was 2.0 ± 1.15 (range, 1–5) per patient. Lymph node metastasis was identified in 3 of the 22 patients (13.6%), and none of the 3 patients with N1 or N2 disease had false-negative SLNs. SLN identification might be an indicator of whether or not MLND should be performed during pulmonary metastasectomy. However, further large-volume and multi-institutional studies are needed.

Surgery of colorectal cancer lung metastases: analysis of survival, recurrence and re-surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgery is considered an effective therapeutic option for patients with lung metastasis (MTS) of colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of the study was to evaluate efficacy and feasibility of lung metastasectomy in CRC patients and to explore factors of prognostic relevance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients operated for lung MTS of CRC from 2004 to 2012 in a single Institution. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) in resection status R0 and OS in in patients submitted to re-resections. In order to evaluate prognostic factors, a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was performed.

RESULTS

One-hundred eighty-eight consecutive patients were included in the final analysis. The median follow-up (FU) was 45 months. The 5-year OS and PFS were 53% (95% CI: 44-60%) and 33% (95% CI: 25-42%), respectively. Two- and 5-year survival after re-resection were 79% (95% CI: 63-89%) and 49% (95% CI: 31-65%), respectively. Multivariate adjusted analysis showed that primary CRC pathological TNM stages (P=0.019), number of resected MTS ≥5 (P=0.009) and lymph nodal involvement (P<0.0001) are independent predictors of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients operated and re-operated for lung MTS from CRC cancers showed encouraging survival rates. Our results indicated that primary CRC stage, number of MTS and lymph nodal involvement are strong predictive factors. Prognosis after surgery remained comforting up to four resected MTS. Adjuvant chemotherapy seems to have a benefit on survival in patients affected by multiple metastases. Finally, according to the high rate of unidentified lymph node involvement in pre-operative setting, lymph node sampling should be advisable for a correct staging.

Lymphadenectomy During Pulmonary Metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy continues to be an effective approach to prolong survival in appropriately selected patients. The incidence of lymphatic spread is more common than previously recognized, with an estimate of 20% to 25% across multiple tumor types. The presence of metastatically involved lymph nodes adversely affects survival. What remains unclear is whether N1 vs N2, or the number of stations involved affects survival differently. The role of surgery for pulmonary metastasectomy in the patient with nodal metastases will likely expand with ongoing improvements in targeted and immunotherapies.

[Surgery for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: Predictive factors for survival]

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is the 3rd commonest cause of death from cancer: 5% of patients will develop lung metastases. The management of oligometastatic disease is based on the objective of optimal local control.

STATE OF THE ART

To date, no results from randomized control trials support the resection of pulmonary metastases in oligometastastic colorectal cancer patients. However, numerous series, mainly retrospective, report long-term survival for highly selected patients, with 5-year survival ranging from 45 to 65% in the most recent series. The consensual predictive factors of a good prognosis are: a disease free-interval>36 months, a number of metastases≤3, a normal level of carcino-embryonic antigen and the absence of hilar or mediastinal lymph node involvement.

PERSPECTIVES

Around 20 to 40% of patients will develop recurrence, probably linked to the presence of undetectable micrometastases. Therefore, experimental work is being undertaken to develop new treatment techniques such as isolated lung perfusion, radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Highly selected patients suffering from colorectal cancer lung metastases could benefit from resection with improved survival and disease-control.

Increased lymphangiogenesis in lung metastases from colorectal cancer is associated with early lymph node recurrence and decreased overall survival

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is an accepted treatment modality in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with pulmonary tumor spread. Positive intrathoracic lymph nodes at the time of PM are associated with a poor prognosis and 5-year survival rates of <20 %. Increased lymphangiogenesis in pulmonary metastases might represent an initial step for a subsequent lymphangiogenic spreading. We aimed to evaluate the presence of lymphangiogenesis in clinically lymph node negative patients undergoing PM and its impact on outcome parameters. 71 patients who underwent PM for CRC metastases were included in this dual-center study. Tissue specimens of pulmonary metastases and available corresponding primary tumors were assessed by immunohistochemistry for lymphatic microvessel density (LMVD) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Results were correlated with clinical outcome parameters. LMVD was 13.9 ± 8.1 and 13.3 ± 8.5 microvessels/field (mean ± SD) in metastases and corresponding primary CRC; LVI was evident in 46.5 and 58.6 % of metastases and corresponding primary CRC, respectively. Samples with high LMVD had a higher likelihood of LVI. LVI was associated with early tumor recurrence in intrathoracic lymph nodes and a decreased overall survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.029). Herein, we present first evidence in a well-defined patient collective that increased lymphangiogenesis is already present in a subtype of pulmonary metastases of patients staged as N0 at the time of PM. This lymphangiogenic phenotype has a strong impact on patients' prognosis. Our findings may have impact on the post-surgical therapeutic management of CRC patients with pulmonary spreading.

Pulmonary metastasectomy: outcomes and issues according to the type of surgical resection

According to a recent report by the Committee for Scientific Affairs of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, pulmonary metastasectomy accounted for as many as 10.2 % of all entry cases of general thoracic surgery, and its use is increasing year by year. Accordingly, many studies have examined the surgical procedures used during pulmonary metastasectomy for metastases from primary tumors affecting various organs as well as the outcomes of and indications for such procedures, but some problems remain. In this article, the following questions related to the surgical approach and the type of resection used during pulmonary metastasectomy are reviewed: (1) Wedge resection--what is a safe margin for preventing local recurrence? (2) What is the clinical significance of node sampling/dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy? and (3) When is segmentectomy necessary? In addition, we discuss: (4) open thoracotomy vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), (5) repeated metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases, (6) the surgical approach for bilateral pulmonary metastasectomy, (7) pneumonectomy, and (8) pulmonary metastasectomy combined with resection of the neighboring organs.