A meta-analysis of resected metachronous second non-small cell lung cancer

Multidisciplinary expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of multiple lung cancers

The rising incidence of multiple lung cancers (MLCs), encompassing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM), poses two significant clinical challenges. First, distinguishing between MPLC and IPM remains difficult due to insufficiently accurate criteria and ambiguous integration of genetic testing. Second, standardized therapeutic protocols are still lacking. To address these issues, the Lung Cancer Expert Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association (CACA) assembled a multidisciplinary expert panel spanning thoracic surgery, pulmonary medicine, oncology, radiology, and pathology. Following a comprehensive literature review ending on October 23, 2024, the panel engaged in iterative discussions and conducted two rounds of expert voting, culminating in 25 evidence-based recommendations across five key domains: epidemiology, pre-treatment evaluation, definitive diagnostics, surgical treatment, and non-surgical treatment. This consensus provides clinicians with practical guidance to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic decision-making in MLC management while highlighting unmet needs to inform future guideline development.

Distinguishing MPLCs from IPMs using NGS-based molecular algorithms and histological assessment: A systematic review and validation study

Distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers and intrapulmonary metastases is crucial for staging, therapeutic planning, and prognosis. Traditional histological assessment provides a foundation for diagnosis, which can be limited when tumors showed identical or similar histological types. This systematic review and independent validation study aimed to evaluate the performance of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular algorithms alongside histological methods for the classification of multiple lung adenocarcinomas (MLAs). We conducted a literature search to identify relevant studies and selected algorithms for validation using a cohort of patients with MLAs. Our analysis included 27 patients with MLAs and compared histological assessment using Martini and Melamed criteria and comprehensive histologic assessment combined with a low-grade lepidic component (CHA & lepidic) with NGS data. We found a high consistency between CHA & lepidic and NGS-based diagnoses, although some discrepancies remained, particularly in cases with no somatic mutations or distant metastases. NGS-based molecular algorithms offer a high degree of accuracy in determining the origin of MLAs, supporting or challenging histological diagnoses. However, histological methods remain valuable, especially when NGS data are inconclusive. This study underscores the complementary nature of histology and molecular diagnostics in the precise classification of MLAs.

Impact of chemoradiotherapy for first primary lung cancer on the prognosis and re-chemoradiotherapy sensitivity of second primary lung cancer

Background

Despite undergoing surgery and chemoradiotherapy, patients with first primary lung cancer (FPLC) remain at risk for second primary lung cancer (SPLC), which is associated with a poor prognosis. The effects of FPLC chemoradiotherapy on SPLC prognosis and its sensitivity to re-chemoradiotherapy have not been adequately investigated.

Methods

This cohort study analyzed data from 23,827 patients who underwent FPLC surgery during 1973-2021, drawn from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Among these, 5,302 FPLC patients developed SPLC within 5 years of their initial diagnosis. We employed the Fine-Gray competitive risk model, Cox proportional hazards model, and restricted mean survival time analysis to assess the effects of FPLC radiotherapy and chemotherapy on SPLC risk and survival differences.

Results

The competitive risk model indicated that FPLC radiotherapy and chemotherapy did not significantly change the risk of developing SPLC. However, the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that FPLC radiotherapy was associated with decreased overall survival (OS; HR=1.251, P<0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR=1.228, P=0.001) in patients with SPLC. Conversely, FPLC chemotherapy was linked to improved OS (HR=0.881, P=0.012) in this population. Patients with SPLC who received combined chemoradiotherapy for FPLC exhibited significantly reduced survival times (OS: HR=1.157, P=0.030; CSS: HR=1.198, P=0.018), a finding confirmed across multiple models. For SPLC patients with prior FPLC chemoradiotherapy, subsequent SPLC radiotherapy significantly improved prognosis. Notably, this benefit is even more pronounced in patients who have not received prior chemoradiotherapy. While SPLC chemotherapy enhanced OS for patients who did not receive FPLC chemotherapy, it was associated with reduced CSS for those who had.

Conclusions

Overall, FPLC chemoradiotherapy influences SPLC prognosis and influences sensitivity to treatment. Tailoring SPLC management to FPLC treatment regimens may improve survival outcomes.

Optimizing the NGS-based discrimination of multiple lung cancers from the perspective of evolution

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers a promising approach for differentiating multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM), though panel selection and clonal interpretation remain challenging. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 80 lung cancer samples were utilized to simulate MPLC and IPM, with various sequenced panels constructed through gene subsampling. Two clonal interpretation approaches primarily applied in clinical practice, MoleA (based on shared mutation comparison) and MoleB (based on probability calculation), were subsequently evaluated. ROC analysis highlighted MoleB's superior performance, especially with the NCCNplus panel (AUC = 0.950 ± 0.002) and pancancer MoleA (AUC = 0.792 ± 0.004). In two independent cohorts (WES cohort, N = 42 and non-WES cohort, N = 94), NGS-based methodologies effectively stratified disease-free survival, with NCCNplus MoleB further predicting prognosis. Phylogenetic analysis further revealed evolutionary distinctions between MPLC and IPM, establishing an optimized NGS-based framework for differentiating multiple lung cancers.

Real-World Survival Comparisons Between Radiotherapy and Surgery for Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer and Predictions of Lung Cancer-Specific Outcomes Using Machine Learning: Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) is not that rare but is seldom studied.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to compare real-world survival outcomes between different surgery strategies and radiotherapy for MSPLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data collected from patients with MSPLC between 1988 and 2012 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses and machine learning were performed to compare variables between patients with MSPLC. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 2451 MSPLC patients were categorized into the following treatment groups: 864 (35.3%) received radiotherapy, 759 (31%) underwent surgery, 89 (3.6%) had surgery plus radiotherapy, and 739 (30.2%) had neither treatment. After PSM, 470 pairs each for radiotherapy and surgery were generated. The surgery group had significantly better survival than the radiotherapy group (P<.001) and the untreated group (563 pairs; P<.001). Further analysis revealed that both wedge resection (85 pairs; P=.004) and lobectomy (71 pairs; P=.002) outperformed radiotherapy in overall survival for MSPLC patients. Machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting, random forest classifier, adaptive boosting) demonstrated high predictive performance based on area under the curve (AUC) values. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis identified 9 significant variables impacting cancer-specific survival, emphasizing surgery's consistent influence across 1 year to 10 years. These variables encompassed age at diagnosis, sex, year of diagnosis, radiotherapy of initial primary lung cancer (IPLC), primary site, histology, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy of MPSLC. Competing risk analysis highlighted lower mortality for female MPSLC patients (hazard ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87) and recent IPLC diagnoses (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85), while radiotherapy for IPLC increased mortality (HR=1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.50). Surgery alone had the lowest cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.85), with sublevel resection having the lowest mortality rate among the surgical approaches (HR=0.26, 95% CI 0.21-0.31). The findings provide valuable insights into the factors that influence cumulative cancer-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resections such as wedge resection and lobectomy confer better survival than radiation therapy for MSPLC, but radiation can be a valid alternative for the treatment of MSPLC.

The characteristics and prognosis of different disease patterns of multiple primary lung cancers categorized according to the 8th edition lung cancer staging system

INTRODUCTION

The 8th edition lung cancer staging system was the first to describe the detailed diagnosis and staging of multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC). However, the characteristics and prognosis of MPLC categorized according to the new system have not been evaluated.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed data from surgically treated MPLC patients in a single center from 2011 to 2013 and explored the characteristics and outcomes of different MPLC disease patterns.

RESULTS

In total, 202 surgically treated MPLC patients were identified and classified into different groups according to disease categories and diagnostic time (multifocal ground glass/lepidic (GG/L) nodules: n = 139, second primary lung cancer (SPLC): n = 63, simultaneous MPLC (sMPLC): n = 171, and metachronous MPLC (mMPLC): n = 31). There were significant differences in clinical characteristics between SPLC and GG/L nodule patients and simultaneous and metachronous MPLC patients. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year lung cancer-specific survival rates of MPLC were 97.98%, 90.18%, and 82.81%, respectively. Five-year survival was better in patients with multiple GG/L nodules than in those with SPLC (87.94% vs. 71.29%, P < 0.05). Sex was an independent prognostic factor for sMPLC (5-year survival, female vs. male, 88.0% vs. 69.5%, P < 0.05), and in multiple tumors, the highest tumor stage was an independent prognostic factor for all categories of MPLC.

CONCLUSIONS

The different disease patterns of MPLC have significantly different characteristics and prognoses. Clinicians should place treatment emphasis on the tumor with the highest stage as it is the main contributor to the prognosis of all categories of MPLC patients.

Enhanced Survival with Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lymphadenectomy is a cornerstone in the surgical management of resectable primary lung cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) remains poorly understood. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in these patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER Database for patients surgically treated for stage I MSPLC between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score-matching was employed to create comparable cohorts, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after lymphadenectomy compared to non-lymphadenectomy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Among 920 identified patients with MSPLC, 574 (62.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Propensity score-matching yielded 255 patients in both the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Over a median follow-up of 38 months, the 5-year overall survival probability after a diagnosis of MSPLC was 58.7% in the lymphadenectomy group and 43.9% in the non-lymphadenectomy group (HR: 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.90; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, lymphadenectomy is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with stage I MSPLC. These findings suggest the potential benefit of incorporating lymphadenectomy into the surgical management of MSPLC, providing valuable guidance for thoracic surgeons in clinical decision-making.

Favourable surgical outcomes for either second primary lung cancer or intrapulmonary metastasis after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Metachronous lung cancer arising after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is either a second primary lung cancer (SPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) of the initial lung cancer; however, differential diagnosis is difficult. We evaluated the surgical outcomes of metachronous lung cancer in a combined population of patients with SPLC and IPM.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 3534 consecutive patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer between 1992 and 2016 was conducted at 4 institutions.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (66 males; median age, 70 years) who underwent a second pulmonary resection for metachronous lung cancer were included. Most patients (81%) underwent sublobar resection, and there was no 30-day mortality. All metachronous lung cancers were cN0, 5 were pN1-2. The postoperative comprehensive histologic assessment revealed SPLC (n = 77) and IPM (n = 28). The 5-year overall survival rate after the second resection was 70.6% (median follow-up: 69.7 months). A multivariable analysis showed that age >70 years at the second resection (P = 0.013), male sex (P = 0.003), lymph node involvement in metachronous cancer (P < 0.001), pathological invasive size of metachronous cancer >15 mm (P < 0.001) and overlapping squamous cell carcinoma histology of the initial and metachronous cancers (P = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors for poor survival after the second resection, whereas histological IPM was not (P = 0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for cN0 metachronous lung cancer is safe and shows good outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the SPLC and IPM results. Caution should be exercised when operating on patients with overlapping squamous cell carcinoma.

Restrictive Ventilatory Impairment as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients Who Undergo Surgical Resection for Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic impact of restrictive ventilatory impairment in patients who undergo pulmonary resection of metachronous second primary lung cancer.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of 70 patients with metachronous second primary lung cancer were analyzed.

RESULTS

The surgical procedures consisted of wedge resection in 40 patients, segmentectomy in 17, lobectomy in 12, and completion pneumonectomy in one. Patients who underwent ipsilateral pulmonary resection developed more perioperative complications (p = 0.0339). Three-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 78.2% and 69.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, sex, restrictive ventilatory impairment, and histology of second primary lung cancer were significantly poor prognostic factors (all p <0.05). Multivariate analysis identified restrictive ventilatory impairment to be an independent predictor of a poor prognosis (p = 0.0193). In the 22 patients who died, the cause of death was lung cancer in 11 and other diseases, including pneumonia and respiratory failure, in 11. Death from another disease was significantly more common in patients with restrictive ventilatory impairment (p = 0.0216).

CONCLUSION

Restrictive ventilatory impairment was an independent predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with a second primary lung cancer. Restrictive ventilatory impairment as a result of repeated thoracic surgery may increase the likelihood of death from another disease.

Treatments and whole exon sequencing of a case with multiple primary lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The number of patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) has increased recently. However, diagnosing and selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for this type of disease is not simple.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report presented a case of sMPLC with lymph node metastasis. With no smoking and cancer history, this patient had seven nodules in the right lung and underwent single-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). In addition, she received four cycles of chemotherapy after the operation. Whole exon sequencing (WES) was performed in five resected tissue samples (four tumors and one lymph node). We conducted genomic profiling and clone evolution analysis of the five samples. Gene detection helped to confirm that the metastasis lymph node was transferred from one nodule. There was apparent heterogeneity of gene mutations among the five samples of the patient, with only one shared "neurofilament heavy polypeptide" (NEFH) mutation. A dominant substitution of C > T/G > A was found in all the samples. Pyclone model was used to calculate all tissues' cellular prevalence (CP) values, and NEFH mutations were thought to be the ancestral clones. During the follow-up period, residual lesions showed no apparent changes and limited response to chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This report showed an essential role in genomic detection and selecting the appropriate treatment of sMPLC. Surgery remains the primary treatment strategy for this type of disease, and the occurrence and development of sMPLC need more in-depth research.

Multiple primary lung cancer: Updates of clinical management and genomic features

In recent decades, multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasingly prevalent in clinical practice. However, many details about MPLC have not been completely settled, such as understanding the driving force, clinical management, pathological mechanisms, and genomic architectures of this disease. From the perspective of diagnosis and treatment, distinguishing MPLC from lung cancer intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) has been a clinical hotpot for years. Besides, compared to patients with single lung lesion, the treatment for MPLC patients is more individualized, and non-operative therapies, such as ablation and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), are prevailing. The emergence of next-generation sequencing has fueled a wave of research about the molecular features of MPLC and advanced the NCCN guidelines. In this review, we generalized the latest updates on MPLC from definition, etiology and epidemiology, clinical management, and genomic updates. We summarized the different perspectives and aimed to offer novel insights into the management of MPLC.

Prognostic Nomogram and Therapeutic Option of Cancer-Specific Death in the Patients with Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer

With the increase of long-term primary lung cancer survivors, studies focused on metachronous second primary lung cancer (SPLC) have become very urgent. This study aimed to develop a prognostic nomogram and determine therapeutic options of cancer-specific death for patients with metachronous SPLC with and without the competing risk of other-specific death. Study population came from the SEER-18 database between 2006 and 2016. According to the clinical practice guideline of SPLC, the interval time of IPLC and metachronous SPLC was set to 4 years. We constructed nomograms with Lasso + Cox regression model and competing risk model to predict the prognosis and identify therapeutic options of metachronous SPLC patients with the assessment of model performance by the C-index, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. In addition, two subgroup analyses stratified by histology and tumor size were used to better select therapeutic options for a certain population. 1300 patients with metachronous SPLC were incorporated in this study with 50.1% of the 5-year cumulative incidence in cancer-specific death. Compared with Lasso + Cox regression analysis, competing risk analysis harbored a higher C-index (0.811 vs. 0.76) and better net benefit in predicting cancer-specific death of metachronous SPLC. Two statistical analyses suggested that surgery alone was a preferentially therapeutic option of metachronous SPLC, whereas the effect of surgery + radiation in treating metachronous SPLC was similar to radiation alone. Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with metachronous SPLC were considered receiving different therapeutic options in different histology and tumor size but preferred to receive surgical treatment as the first choice. For primary lung cancer survivors, aggressive surgical treatment was the first-line selection of metachronous SPLC, followed by radiation alone, surgery + radiation, and no surgery + radiation.

Clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal metastases from lung cancer: systematic review of the case reports in the Japanese literature

Since colorectal metastases from primary lung cancer are rare, the location of metastatic lesion and prognostic factors have not been well evaluated. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of Japanese patients with colorectal metastasis from lung cancer. We searched the Ichushi-Web database from January 1964 to December 2020. We found 59 colorectal metastases in 52 cases for this meta-analysis. Small cell carcinoma was shown to have significantly more metastases to the appendix than non-small cell carcinoma. However, there was no significant correlation between location and histology when classified into right and left colons (P = 0.247). The median overall survival after diagnosis was 6 months. Univariate analysis showed that adenocarcinoma (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.383, P = 0.024), simultaneous metastasis (HR 0.325, P = 0.046), and chemotherapy group (HR 0.482, P = 0.044) were good prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that chemotherapy (HR 0.38, P = 0.02) was an independent good prognostic factor for overall survival. In conclusion, although there was no statistical difference, right colon metastases were more frequent than left colon metastases. Chemotherapy may be effective for colorectal metastases from lung cancer.

Guiding Principles in the Management of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Multiple lung cancers can be found simultaneously, with incidence ranging from 1% to 8%. Documentation of more than 1 pulmonary lesion can be challenging, because these solid, ground-glass, or mixed-density tumors may represent multicentric malignant disease or intrapulmonary metastases. If mediastinal nodal and distant deposits are excluded, surgery should be contemplated. After surgical treatment of lung cancer, patients should be followed closely for an undetermined period of time. Good clinical judgment is of outmost importance in deciding which individuals will benefit from those surgical interventions and which are candidates for alternate therapies. Every case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Second pulmonary resection for a second primary lung cancer: analysis of morbidity and survival

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating morbidity and survival of patients operated on for a second primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Retrospective collection of data from patients operated on for a second NSCLC between 2009 and 2018.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. At the time of second pulmonary resection, the median time between the 2 surgeries was 25 months (5-44.5 months). Patients' median age was 65 years (61-68 years). Median tumour size was 16 mm (10-22 mm). Thoracoscopy was used in 75% of cases. The resection was a pneumonectomy (n = 1), bilobectomy (n = 1), lobectomy (n = 15), segmentectomy (n = 32) or wedge resection (n = 3). The length of stay was 7 days (5-9 days). Mortality was null and morbidity was 36.5%, mainly from grade I-II complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The median follow-up was 28 months (13-50 months). The median overall survival was 67 months (95% confidence interval 60.8-73.1 months). Survival at 5 years and specific survival were 71.1% and 67.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A second surgical resection of either synchronous or metachronous NSCLC has a morbidity that is not superior to the morbidity of the first operation. The new tumour is usually diagnosed at an early stage. An anatomical sublobar resection is most likely the best compromise. It might also be considered for the first operation when there is a suspicious synchronous lesion that may require surgery at a later stage.

Anatomic resection has superior long-term survival compared with wedge resection for second primary lung cancer after prior lobectomy

OBJECTIVES

The extent of surgical resection for early-stage second primary lung cancer (SPLC) in patients with a previous lobectomy is unclear. We sought to compare anatomic lung resections (lobectomy and segmentectomy) and wedge resections for small peripheral SPLC using a population-based database.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was queried for all patients with ≤2 cm peripheral SPLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who underwent prior lobectomy for the first primary and surgical resection only for the SPLC. American College of Chest Physicians guidelines were used to classify SPLC. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression were used to compare overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients met the inclusion criteria with 203 (57%) treated with wedge resection and 153 (43%) treated with anatomic resection. Significantly better median survival was observed with anatomic resection than with wedge resection using a Kaplan-Meier analysis (124 vs 63 months; P < 0.001). With multivariable Cox regression, improved long-term survival was observed for anatomic resection (hazard ratio: 0.44, confidence interval: 0.27-0.70; P = 0.001). Improvement in survival was demonstrated with wedge resection when lymph node sampling was done. Lastly, we calculated the average treatment effect on the treated with inverse probability weighting for a subgroup of patients and found that those with wedge resection and lymph node sampling had shorter long-term survival times.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic resections may provide better long-term survival than wedge resections for patients with early-stage peripheral SPLC after prior lobectomy. Significant improvement in survival was observed with wedge resection for SPLC when adequate lymph node dissection was performed.

Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies

Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of modern lung cancer treatment alongside surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Advances in radiotherapy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of radiation delivery, which has contributed to the evolution of radiation therapy into a guideline-recommended treatment in both early-stage and locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Furthermore, although radiotherapy has long been used for palliation of disease in advanced lung cancer, it is increasingly having a role as a locally ablative treatment in patients with oligometastatic disease.This review provides an overview of recent developments in radiation techniques, particularly for non-radiation oncologists who are involved in the care of lung cancer patients. Technical advances are discussed, and findings of recent clinical trials are highlighted, all of which have led to a changing perception of the role of radiation therapy in multidisciplinary care.

Using Liposomes to Alleviate the Toxicity of Chelerythrine, a Natural PKC Inhibitor, in Treating Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aim of the Study

CHE can inhibit the proliferation of lung cancer cells and induce apoptosis. However, despite having in vivo toxicity, CHE has not been thoroughly investigated in term of its in vivo antitumor effect. The present study evaluated the antitumor effect of CHE on non-small cell lung cancer cell line HCC827.

Methods

The antitumor effect of CHE on HCC827 was evaluated, and its potential work mechanism was investigated. CHE long circulation liposomes (CHELPs) modified with polyethylene glycol have been optimized and characterized by in vivo pharmacokinetic studies. A HCC827 xenograft model was developed on BALB/c nude mice for the assessment of the effects of CHE and CHELP.

Results

CHE might inhibit HCC827 growth through the ROS/PKC-ϵ/caspase 3 pathway and glycolysis. The optimized CHELP remained stable after storage for 10 days at 4°C and exhibited sustained drug release, showing approximately one-fifteenth of the in vivo clearance rate and 86 times the absorption concentration of free drug. While increasing the bioavailability of CHE, CHELP showed a good therapeutic effect on HCC827 tumor-bearing nude mice and reduced the toxicity of the free drug, improving the safety of CHE.

Conclusions

CHE is a candidate drug for NSCLC, and liposomes are effective in alleviating the toxicity of CHE.

Role of chemotherapy for survival in patients with second primary non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The therapeutic effect of chemotherapy is still unclear for clinical usage among second primary non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this study was to verify the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy and identify the prognostic factors among patients who had received chemotherapy for second primary NSCLC.

Methods

A retrospective cohort was constructed based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, univariate Cox and multivariate Cox regression, we identified the prognostic factors among clinicopathological features. Propensity score matching analysis was used to verify the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy. Survival curves were plotted among the subgroups of the selected factors. We further selected clinicopathological features that would affect the prognosis among patients who had received chemotherapy through a similar process.

Results

A total of 769 patients were enrolled to verify the therapeutic value of chemotherapy for second primary lung cancer. Significant differences were observed between the chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy group for cancer‐specific survival. 215 patients who had received chemotherapy were analyzed to identify the factors that might influence outcome on the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy. Age, tumor size, histology and treatment were selected as significant factors.

Conclusions

The therapeutic effect of chemotherapy for second primary NSCLC was found to be significant. Age, tumor size and histology were significant prognostic factors among patients who had received chemotherapy for second primary NSCLC.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

A significant therapeutic effect of chemotherapy for second primary non‐small cell lung cancer was proven through univariate Cox regression and propensity score matching analysis.

Prognostic factors for second primary non‐small cell lung cancer patients who had received chemotherapy.

What this study adds

Chemotherapy could be applied in clinical practice as an additional therapeutic method for second primary non‐small cell lung cancer patients.

We selected prognostic factors for patients who had received chemotherapy to identify patients who were appropriate for chemotherapy.

Comparison of sublobar resection and lobectomy for patients with small (≤2cm) second primary non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate whether sublobar resection (SR) is equivalent to lobectomy for small (≤ 2 cm) second primary lung cancer (SPLC).

METHODS

We identified 834 patients with T1aN0M0 SPLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2000-2016. Overall survival (OS) was compared between lobectomy and SR after propensity-score matching. A total of 228 patients with SPLC were identified from three institutions in China as the validation set.

RESULTS

SR was an independent risk factor for patients with 1 to 2 cm SPLC (SR vs Lob: hazard ratio [HR], 1.593; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.186-2.141; P = .002) but not for patients with SPLC ≤ 1 cm (SR vs Lob: HR, 1.206; 95% CI, 0.790-1.841; P = .385). Subgroup analysis on the SEER data indicated that OS favored lobectomy compared with SR for contralateral SPLC ≤ 2 cm but not for ipsilateral ones (ipsilateral: P = .692; contralateral: P = .030). Our multi-institutional data also revealed that SR was equivalent to lobectomy for patients with ≤2 cm ipsilateral SPLC.

CONCLUSIONS

SR is equivalent to lobectomy for SPLC ≤ 1 cm but not for SPLC > 1 to 2 cm. SR might be recommended for patients with ipsilateral small SPLC considering the difficulty in reoperations.

Repeated anatomical pulmonary resection for metachronous ipsilateral second non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the surgical outcomes of repeated pulmonary resection for metachronous ipsilateral second non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 104 (3.6%) patients who underwent surgical resection for ipsilateral metachronous second NSCLC. Repeated anatomical (reanatomical) resection was defined as a metachronous anatomical surgery for secondary NSCLC after ipsilateral primary major lung resection for NSCLC. Operative morbidity or other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by a multivariable model. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven (74%) patients were diagnosed as second primary cases. The 3-year OS after metachronous surgery for ipsilateral second NSCLC was 80.1%, and that of reanatomical resection was equivalent to the other procedures (reanatomical: 81.8%, others: 78.2%, P = .816), whereas reanatomical resection (n = 56) was a significant predictor of postoperative severe morbidity after ipsilateral second pulmonary resection (P = .036) that was found in 23 (41%) patients. When this procedure was classified into 2 groups, ie, completion pneumonectomy (CP; n = 26) and other reanatomical resection to avoid CP (non-CP; n = 32), non-CP was significant on the right side (P = .011), whereas intrapericardial procedure was employed frequently for both (CP: 85%, non-CP: 47%). In contrast, the oncologic outcome (3-year OS; 75.8% vs 87.1%, P = .881) and several surgical outcomes including morbidities were similar between CP and non-CP.

CONCLUSIONS

Reanatomical pulmonary resection showed acceptable oncologic outcomes for metachronous ipsilateral second NSCLC. The non-CP procedure was technically challenging; however, both oncologic and surgical results were feasible compared with the CP. This procedure might be a promising novel strategy for properly selected ipsilateral second NSCLC.

Surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy for metachronous primary lung cancer? A propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

We compared outcomes after surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) among patients with metachronous primary lung cancer (MPLC).

METHODS

Patients with MPLC were treated with either surgery (2008-2018) or SBRT (2010-2018). We used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias from various clinicopathological factors. MPLC was defined by the Martini and Melamed criteria.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients, 51 underwent surgery and 26 received SBRT. Most median clinicopathological characteristics did not significantly differ between the surgery and SBRT groups (male sex: 67% vs 65%; age: 73 vs 77 years; time after first surgery: 6.2 vs 4.7 years; lobectomy as first procedure: 82% vs 85%; second tumor size: 11 vs 12 mm; clinical stage I: 96% vs 100%; CEA: 2.9 vs 3.0 ng/ml). However, the surgery group had significantly more ipsilateral second tumors (n = 71, 58%, P = 0.003), better performance status (P = 0.03), and preserved lung function (P = 0.02). Surgery, thus, tended to be selected for patients with good physical function and for the MPLC in the contralateral side. Five-year overall survival did not significantly differ between the surgery and SBRT groups, either before PSM (86.5% vs 65.8%, P = 0.24, log-rank) or after PSM (100% vs 84.4%, P = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery and SBRT for MPLC patients are safe and feasible treatments with similar outcomes. However, this finding should be verified by a random controlled trial with a larger study cohort.

Surgical treatment to multiple primary lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As there is no consensus on the optimal surgery strategy for multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC), we conducted this study to address this issue by comparing the prognosis of MPLC patients underwent different surgical strategies including sublobar resection and the standard resection through a systemic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Relevant literature was obtained from three databases including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set for the screening of articles to be selected for further conduction of systemic review and meta-analysis. The HRs of OS of the sublobar group compared with standard resection group were extracted directly or calculated indirectly from included researches.

RESULTS

Ten researches published from 2000 to 2017 were included in this study, with 468 and 445 MPLC cases for the standard resection group and sublobar resection group respectively. The result suggested that OS of MPLC patients underwent sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection for at least one lesion) was comparable with those underwent standard resection approach (lobectomy or pneumonectomy for all lesions), with HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.67-1.71, p = 0.784. Further analysis found no difference in subgroups of synchronous and metachronous (from second metachronous lesion), different population region and dominant sex type.

CONCLUSIONS

This study may reveal that sublobar resection is acceptable for patients with MPLC at an early stage, because of the equivalent prognosis to the standard resection and better pulmonary function preservation. Further research is needed to validate these findings.

Clinical outcomes of patients with metachronous second primary lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinomas as multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) is increasing. How to determine the treatment strategies of MPLCs, especially second primary lung adenocarcinomas (SPLACs), and the prognostic factors associated with it are unclear.

METHODS

The clinical records of patients undergoing surgery for second adenocarcinomas based on Martini-Melamed criteria between 2001 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients with SPLACs were identified based on Martini-Melamed criteria. With respect to the second resections, three subgroups with low- (adenocarcinoma in situ, n=6; minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, n=19), intermediate- (lepidic, n=9; acinar, n=40; papillary, n=23), and high-grades (solid, n=9; micropapillary, n=2; invasive mucinous, n=7) were assigned. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates from the time of the first and the second resections were 86.5% and 69.5%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis identified computed tomography (CT) morphology of SPLACs (ground glass opacity predominant versus solid predominant; hazard ratio [HR]=0.42; P=0.036), histologic classification (same/similar vs different; HR=0.06; P<0.001), pathologic stage of the primary (stage I vs II; HR=0.20; P=0.015) and second tumors (stage I vs IIIa; HR=0.21; P=0.002), and histologic grade of SPLACs (low- vs high-grade, HR=0.05, P=0.016; intermediate- vs high-grade, HR=0.37, P=0.027) as significantly favorable prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

In addition to pathologic stage of the initial tumors and histologic classification, pathologic stage and CT morphology of SPLACs were identified as predictors of survival. The histologic grade of SPLACs based on the new adenocarcinoma classification could provide additional prognostic information.

Metachronous Lung Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Surgical Treatment

The occurrence of a second lung tumor after surgical removal of lung cancer usually indicates a lung cancer metastasis, but sometimes a new lesion proves to be a new primary lung cancer, i.e., metachronous lung cancer. The goal of the present study was to conduct a clinical evaluation of patients with metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metastasis, and to compare the early and distant outcomes of surgical treatment in both cancer types. There were 26 age-matched patients with lung cancer metastases and 23 patients with metachronous lung cancers, who underwent a second lung cancer resection. We evaluated the histological type of a resected cancer, the extent of thoracosurgery, the frequency of early postoperative complications, and the probability of 5-year survival after the second operation. The findings were that metachronous lung cancer was adenocarcinoma in 52% of patients, with a different histopathological pattern from that of the primary lung cancer in 74% of patients. In both cancer groups, mechanical resections were the most common surgery type (76% of all cases), with anatomical resections such as segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumectomy being much rarer conducted. The incidence of early postoperative complications in metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metastasis (30% vs. 31%, respectively) and the probability of 5-year survival after resection of either cancer tumor (60.7% vs. 50.9%, respectively) were comparable. In conclusion, patients undergoing primary lung cancer surgery require a long-term follow-up due to the risk of metastatic or metachronous lung cancer. The likelihood of metachronous lung cancer and pulmonary lung cancer metastases, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the probability of 5-year survival after resection of metachronous lung cancer or lung cancer metastasis are similar.

Recurrence and Survival After Segmentectomy in Patients With Prior Lung Resection for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy is the standard of care for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the treatment of choice for patients with prior lung resection and a second primary NSCLC has not been established. We compared rates and patterns of recurrence and survival in patients with and without prior lung resection treated by segmentectomy and determined predictors of recurrence.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 90 patients who underwent 91 consecutive segmentectomies for early-stage NSCLC between April 2004 and December 2014. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of recurrence, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine survival.

RESULTS

Of the 91 segmentectomies, 21 (23%) had a prior lung cancer resection and 70 (77%) were primary resections. There were 18 recurrences (20%): 9 of 21 (43%) in those with prior lung resection and 9 of 70 (13%) in those without. The 90-day mortality was 0%. The recurrence-free survival and 5-year survival were 61% and 55% in those with prior lung resection (p = 0.09) and 84% and 65% in those without (p = 0.4). Close parenchymal margin and number of lymph nodes examined were significant modifiable predictors of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy is a reasonable option for patients with early-stage NSCLC who have had a prior lung resection. It results in similar survival but trends toward lower recurrence-free survival compared with patients undergoing primary resection.

Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer

In this chapter, we discuss the preoperative evaluation that is necessary prior to surgical resection, stage-specific surgical management of lung cancer, and the procedural steps as well as the indications to a variety of surgical approaches to lung resection.