1
|
Al-Tawil M, Friedrich C, Broll A, Salem M, Schoettler J, de Silva N, Kolat P, Schoeneich F, Haneya A. Sex-based disparities in ascending aortic aneurysm surgery outcomes: a comprehensive analysis of 1148 consecutive patients with propensity-score matching. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 19:331. [PMID: 38877532 PMCID: PMC11177366 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02646-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women undergoing cardiac surgery have been historically recognized to carry higher periprocedural mortality risk. We aimed to investigate the influence of sex on clinical presentation, perioperative, and long-term outcomes in patients who undergo surgery for ascending aortic aneurysm. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 1148 consecutive patients (380 [33.1%] female) who underwent thoracic aortic surgery under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest for ascending aortic aneurysms between 2001 and 2021. Baseline and operative characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and survival were compared between male and female patients before and after propensity-score-matched (PSM) analysis. RESULTS Women were significantly older (median age: 69 [IQR: 63-75] vs. 67 [IQR: 58-73]; P < 0.001), while men had a higher prevalence of aortic valve stenosis, bicuspid valve and coronary artery disease at the time of surgery (P < 0.05). After PSM, EuroSCORE II (4.36 [2.68; 6.87] vs. 3.22 [1.85; 5.31]; p < 0.001), and indexed aortic diameter were significantly higher in female patients (2.94 [2.68; 3.30] vs. 2.58 [2.38; 2.81] cm/m2, p < 0.001). In the matched cohort, men were more likely to experience postoperative delirium (18.1% vs. 11.5%; P = 0.002), and postoperative neurological deficits (6.7% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.044),. Female patients were more likely to receive postoperative packed red blood cells (p = 0.036) and fresh frozen plasma (p = 0.049). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was similar between both groups. Long-term survival was comparable between both groups with 88% vs. 88% at 5 years, 76% vs. 71% at 10 years, and 59% vs. 47% at 15 years. CONCLUSION Female patients required more transfusions, while males had a higher incidence of postoperative delirium and neurological deficits. Differences in preoperative age and timing of surgery between the sexes could be attributed to variations in comorbidity profiles and the greater prevalence of concomitant surgery indications in males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Al-Tawil
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Christine Friedrich
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alexandra Broll
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Mohamed Salem
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jan Schoettler
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nora de Silva
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Philipp Kolat
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Felix Schoeneich
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Assad Haneya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kolodziej JH, Spinella PC, Brown JB, Lu L, Josephson CD, Leonard JC, Leeper CM. Patient sex and outcomes in children with life-threatening hemorrhage. Transfusion 2024; 64 Suppl 2:S72-S84. [PMID: 38511654 PMCID: PMC11081818 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent data suggest female sex imparts a survival benefit after trauma in adults. The independent associations between patient sex and age with outcomes have not been examined in children with life-threatening hemorrhage (LTH) from all etiologies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study of children with LTH, Massive Transfusion in Children (MATIC), we analyzed if patient sex and age were associated with differences in severity of illness, therapies, and outcomes. Primary outcomes were 24 hour mortality and weight-adjusted transfusion volume during LTH. Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square testing, and multivariable linear regression were used for adjusted analyses. RESULTS Of 449 children, 45% were females and 55% were males. Females were more commonly younger, white, and with less trauma as the etiology of LTH compared to males. Markers of clinical severity were similar between groups, except injury severity score (ISS) was higher in females in the trauma subgroup. In terms of resuscitative practices, females received greater weight-adjusted total transfusion volumes compared to males (76 (40-150) mL/kg vs. 53 (24-100) mL/kg), as well as increased red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, and platelets compared to males. After adjustment for confounders, female sex and age 0-11 years were independently associated with increased transfusion volume during LTH. There were no differences in mortality or adverse outcomes according to patient sex. CONCLUSION Patient sex and age may impact factors associated with LTH and therapies received. Studies in developmental hemostasis are needed to determine the optimal transfusion strategy for LTH according to patient sex and age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia H. Kolodziej
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Philip C. Spinella
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua B. Brown
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Liling Lu
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cassandra D. Josephson
- Cancer and Blood Disorders Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA
- Departments of Oncology and Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Julie C. Leonard
- Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Christine M. Leeper
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tseng EE. Proximal Aortic Surgery in Women-We Need to Do Better. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 116:1193-1194. [PMID: 35793719 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine E Tseng
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, 500 Parnassus Ave, Ste 405W, Box 0118, San Francisco, CA 94143.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Preventza O, Akpan-Smart E, Simpson KK, Cornwell LD, Amarasekara H, Green SY, Chatterjee S, LeMaire SA, Coselli JS. The intersection of community socioeconomic factors with gender on outcomes after thoracic aortic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1572-1582.e10. [PMID: 36396474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the relationship among community socioeconomic factors (poverty, income, and education), gender, and outcomes in patients who underwent ascending aortic, root, and arch surgery. METHODS For 2634 consecutive patients, we associated patients' ZIP codes with community socioeconomic factors. The composite adverse outcome comprised death, persistent neurological injury, and renal failure necessitating dialysis at discharge. Multivariable analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used. Men and women from the full cohort and from the elective patients were propensity matched. RESULTS Median follow-up was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 1.2-9.3). Men lived in areas characterized by less poverty (P = .03), higher household income (P = .01), and more education (P = .02) than women; likewise, in the elective cohort, all community socioeconomic factors favored men (P ≤ .009). Female gender predicted composite adverse outcome (P = .006). In the propensity-matched women and men (820 pairs), the composite adverse outcome rates were 14.2% and 11%, respectively (P = .06). In 583 propensity-matched pairs of elective patients, men had less composite adverse outcome (P = .02), operative mortality (P = .04), and renal (P = .02) and respiratory failure (P = .0006). The 5- and 10-year survivals for these men and women were 74.2% versus 71.4% and 50.2% versus 48.2%, respectively (P = .06). All community socioeconomic factors in both propensity-matched groups nonsignificantly favored men. CONCLUSIONS This study is among the first to examine the association among community socioeconomic factors, gender, and outcomes in patients who undergo proximal aortic surgery. Female gender predicted a composite adverse outcome. In the elective patients, most adverse outcomes were significantly less in men. In the propensity-matched patients, all community socioeconomic factors favored men, although not significantly. Larger studies with patient-level socioeconomic information are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ourania Preventza
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, CHI St Luke's Health-Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Tex; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
| | | | - Katherine K Simpson
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Lorraine D Cornwell
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Hiruni Amarasekara
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Susan Y Green
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Subhasis Chatterjee
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, CHI St Luke's Health-Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Scott A LeMaire
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, CHI St Luke's Health-Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Tex; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Joseph S Coselli
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, CHI St Luke's Health-Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Tex; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Kampen A, Haunschild J, von Aspern K, Dietze Z, Misfeld M, Saeed D, Borger MA, Etz CD. Sex-Related Differences After Proximal Aortic Surgery: Outcome Analysis of 1773 Consecutive Patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 116:1186-1193. [PMID: 35697115 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines on the management of aortic aneurysm disease do not account for sex differences regarding surgical procedures on the proximal aorta, although faster aneurysm growth, increased rupture risk, and higher postoperative mortality have been found in women. We therefore analyzed outcome differences between men and women receiving operations on the proximal aorta. METHODS A total of 1773 patients underwent nonemergency surgical procedures on the aortic valve (AV) and proximal aorta at our institution between 2000 and 2018. Of these, 772 patients (21.8% women) received a Bentall procedure, 349 (20.3% women) had AV-sparing root replacement, and 652 (31.1% women) underwent AV and supracommissural ascending aorta replacement. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and midterm survival. RESULTS When assessing sex-related differences within the entire group of patients that received an operation on the proximal aorta, women were found to be older, had a lower body mass index, and were smokers less often. Despite shorter procedural times, median ventilation times and intensive care unit length of stay were longer in women. In-house mortality was also higher in women (3.6% vs 0.9%, P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed age (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3 per 5 years added; P < .001), female sex (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.8; P = .02), and urgent surgery (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.2-7.3; P = .01) as independent risk factors for in-house death. Midterm survival was lower for women in the entire cohort (P = .02) and particularly within the Bentall subgroup (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS Female sex is an independent risk factor for operative mortality in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery but is currently not addressed in guidelines. More research should focus on etiology and prevention of these worse outcomes in female patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia van Kampen
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Josephina Haunschild
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Zara Dietze
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Misfeld
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; The Baird Institute of Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diyar Saeed
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Michael A Borger
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian D Etz
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gökalp AL, Thijssen CGE, Bekkers JA, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bogers AJJC, Geuzebroek GSC, Houterman S, Takkenberg JJM, Mokhles MM. Male-female differences in contemporary elective ascending aortic surgery: insights from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 12:577-587. [PMID: 38090337 PMCID: PMC10711412 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2022-adw-fs-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scientific research regarding male-female differences in ascending aortic surgery is scarce. The objective of this study was to identify male-female differences in presentation, treatment and peri-operative outcome in elective ascending aortic surgery. METHODS Elective ascending aortic surgery procedures that took place in the Netherlands between 01/01/2013-31/12/2017 were identified from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Male-female differences in presentation, treatment characteristics, and in-hospital mortality and morbidity were explored. RESULTS The study population consisted of 887 females (31%) and 1,972 males (69%). Females were older (median age 67 versus 62 years, P<0.001), more often had chronic lung disease (12.3% versus 9.1%, P=0.011), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV (21.5% versus 15.5%, P=0.003), and less often a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (3.2% versus 5.0%, P=0.033). Isolated supracoronary aortic replacement was performed in 47.7% of females versus 30.6% of males (P<0.001), and ascending aorta with root replacement in 40.6% of females versus 56.7% of males (P<0.001). Females more often underwent concomitant interventions of the aortic arch (33.1% versus 20.2%, P<0.001) and the mitral valve (8.2% versus 5.2%, P=0.002), and less often concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (14.4% versus 19.1%, P=0.002). Overall, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in females (5.1% versus 2.7%, P=0.003). In multivariable regression analysis, being female was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.37]. CONCLUSIONS This nation-wide cohort shows clear differences between females and males in patient presentation, procedural characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and risk factors for in-hospital mortality in elective ascending aortic surgery. Further exploration of these differences, and of modifiable within-male and within-female risk factors, may offer great opportunities in improving treatment and thereby outcomes for both males and females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen L. Gökalp
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jos A. Bekkers
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ad J. J. C. Bogers
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Johanna J. M. Takkenberg
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mostafa M. Mokhles
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Schuyler Jones W, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Ross EG, Schermerhorn ML, Singleton Times S, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ, Faxon DP, Upchurch GR, Aday AW, Azizzadeh A, Boisen M, Hawkins B, Kramer CM, Luc JGY, MacGillivray TE, Malaisrie SC, Osteen K, Patel HJ, Patel PJ, Popescu WM, Rodriguez E, Sorber R, Tsao PS, Santos Volgman A, Beckman JA, Otto CM, O'Gara PT, Armbruster A, Birtcher KK, de Las Fuentes L, Deswal A, Dixon DL, Gorenek B, Haynes N, Hernandez AF, Joglar JA, Jones WS, Mark D, Mukherjee D, Palaniappan L, Piano MR, Rab T, Spatz ES, Tamis-Holland JE, Woo YJ. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:e182-e331. [PMID: 37389507 PMCID: PMC10784847 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. STRUCTURE Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
Collapse
|
8
|
Crousillat D, Briller J, Aggarwal N, Cho L, Coutinho T, Harrington C, Isselbacher E, Lindley K, Ouzounian M, Preventza O, Sharma J, Sweis R, Russo M, Scott N, Narula N. Sex Differences in Thoracic Aortic Disease and Dissection: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82:817-827. [PMID: 37612014 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite its higher prevalence among men, women with thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) have lower rates of treatment and surgical intervention and often have worse outcomes. A growing number of women with TAAD also desire pregnancy, which can be associated with an increased risk of aortic complications. Understanding sex-specific differences in TAAD has the potential to improve care delivery, reduce disparities in treatment, and optimize outcomes for women with TAAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Crousillat
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
| | - Joan Briller
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Niti Aggarwal
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Leslie Cho
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Thais Coutinho
- Division of Cardiology, Division of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, Canadian Women's Heart Health Center, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colleen Harrington
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric Isselbacher
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn Lindley
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Maral Ouzounian
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ourania Preventza
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA; Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jyoti Sharma
- Piedmont Heart Institute, Department of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ranya Sweis
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Melissa Russo
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Nandita Scott
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nupoor Narula
- Division of Cardiology and Weill Cornell Women's Heart Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Schuyler Jones W, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Gyang Ross E, Schermerhorn ML, Singleton Times S, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022; 146:e334-e482. [PMID: 36322642 PMCID: PMC9876736 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 461] [Impact Index Per Article: 230.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AIM The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruce E Bray
- AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Data Standards liaison
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Y Joseph Woo
- AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines liaison
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black Iii J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Jones WS, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Ross EG, Schermerhorn ML, Times SS, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80:e223-e393. [PMID: 36334952 PMCID: PMC9860464 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AIM The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. STRUCTURE Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
Collapse
|
11
|
Chikwe J. Editor's Choice: Critical Times for Coronary Revascularization Guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 113:1061-1064. [PMID: 35346446 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Chikwe
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cho L, Kibbe MR, Bakaeen F, Aggarwal NR, Davis MB, Karmalou T, Lawton JS, Ouzounian M, Preventza O, Russo AM, Shroyer ALW, Zwischenberger BA, Lindley KJ. Cardiac Surgery in Women in the Current Era: What Are the Gaps in Care? Circulation 2021; 144:1172-1185. [PMID: 34606298 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.056025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for women in United States and worldwide. One in 3 women dies from cardiovascular disease, and 45% of women >20 years old have some form of CVD. Historically, women have had higher morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Sex influences pathogenesis, pathophysiology, presentation, postoperative complications, surgical outcomes, and survival. This review summarizes current cardiovascular surgery outcomes as they pertain to women. Specifically, this article seeks to address whether sex disparities in research, surgical referral, and outcomes still exist and to provide strategies to close these gaps. In addition, with the growing population of women of reproductive age with cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors, indications for cardiac surgery arise in pregnant women. The current review will also address the unique issues associated with this special population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Cho
- Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Ohio (L.C., F.B.,T.K.)
| | - Melina R Kibbe
- University of North Caroline Medical School, Chapel Hill (M.R.K.)
| | - Faisal Bakaeen
- Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Ohio (L.C., F.B.,T.K.)
| | | | | | - Tara Karmalou
- Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Ohio (L.C., F.B.,T.K.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|