Increased risk of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Results from an international patient-level data meta-analysis

Myositis-Associated Autoantibodies in Patients With Juvenile Myositis Are Associated With Refractory Disease and Mortality

OBJECTIVE

Myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) have been associated with overlap myositis, certain disease manifestations such as interstitial lung disease (ILD), and worse prognosis in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. MAAs overall remain largely uncharacterized in patients with juvenile-onset myositis. Moreover, it is unknown whether the number of MAAs is associated with disease severity.

METHODS

Patients with juvenile myositis in cross-sectional natural history studies who underwent testing for myositis autoantibodies were included. Demographics, myositis autoantibodies, clinical characteristics, medications received, and outcomes of those with and without MAAs were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine whether the number of MAAs detected was associated with severe disease features.

RESULTS

Among 551 patients, 36% had an MAA and 13% had more than one MAA. Among those who were MAA positive, there was a higher frequency of overlap myositis (18% vs 5.9%, P < 0.001). MAA positivity was associated with certain clinical features, including Raynaud phenomenon (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-4.28) and ILD (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.75-6.96), as well as a chronic disease course (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.10-2.72) and mortality (OR 3.76, 95% CI 1.72-8.43). The number of MAAs was also associated with mortality (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.16-2.86).

CONCLUSION

MAAs were prevalent in a large cohort of patients with juvenile myositis. ILD, refractory disease, and mortality were associated with MAA positivity. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether early detection of MAAs may lead to improved outcomes for patients with juvenile myositis.

When anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation becomes difficult: Focus on chronic kidney disease, coagulation disorders, and cancer

Anticoagulation therapy (AT) is fundamental in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment but poses challenges in implementation, especially in AF populations with elevated thromboembolic and bleeding risks. Current guidelines emphasize the need to estimate and balance thrombosis and bleeding risks for all potential candidates of antithrombotic therapy. However, administering oral AT raises concerns in specific populations, such as those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), coagulation disorders, and cancer due to lack of robust data. These groups, excluded from large direct oral anticoagulants trials, rely on observational studies, prompting physicians to adopt individualized management strategies based on case-specific evaluations. The scarcity of evidence and specific guidelines underline the need for a tailored approach, emphasizing regular reassessment of risk factors and anticoagulation drug doses. This narrative review aims to summarize evidence and recommendations for challenging AF clinical scenarios, particularly in the long-term management of AT for patients with CKD, coagulation disorders, and cancer.

Low recurrent thrombosis rates in single positive antiphospholipid syndrome regardless of type of anticoagulation

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is characterized by thrombosis and persistently positive tests for antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Triple-positive APS has the highest risk of recurrent thrombosis, but no studies have focused on recurrent thrombosis in patients with single-positive TAPS. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with single-positive TAPS diagnosed at Lifespan Health System, Rhode Island, to determine the rates and risk factors for recurrent thrombosis. Between January 2001 and April 2022, 128 patients were assessed who had single-positive APS (LAC = 98, aCL = 21, aβ2GPI = 9) and who had been followed for a total of 1453.8 patient-years (median follow-up 3.04 years). The initial antithrombotic regimen was warfarin in 44 %, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in 34 %, enoxaparin in 2 %, and no antithrombotic therapy or antiplatelet therapy only in 20 %. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 16 (12.5 %) with a recurrent thrombosis rate of 3.08 per 100 patient-years. Systemic lupus erythematosus was the only variable significantly associated with recurrent thrombosis in a model adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and type of positive APS test. All 16 patients with recurrent thrombosis were initially treated with warfarin, and, at the time of recurrent thrombosis, 13 patients remained on warfarin and three were off anticoagulation. In conclusion, the recurrent thrombosis rate in single-positive APS is low, and not all patients with a single-positive test may need indefinite anticoagulation with warfarin. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm this finding and establish optimal anticoagulation regimens for low-risk TAPS.

[Geriatric patient with neurological symptoms and prolonged aPTT]

A 73-year-old man with dementia was referred to our clinic with hypernatremia and volume depletion. New-onset neurogenic dysphagia was likely the reason for both. The patient had chronic embolic strokes on the computed tomography (CT) images. Documentation from previous hospitalizations in different hospitals revealed a repeatedly prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT); 5 years prior, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome had already been suspected, but the necessary workup was never completed. We diagnosed the patient with primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and initiated therapy with vitamin K antagonists (phenprocoumon) and aspirin.

Anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism for the general physician

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently encountered across various specialties. The management of VTE has become more nuanced, requiring consideration of several factors when deciding on the choice and duration of anticoagulation. This evidence-based review article summarises the current practice and evidence behind anticoagulation in VTE, incorporating national and international guidelines. Factors influencing decision-making around the choice and duration of anticoagulation, along with special circumstances such as cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome, are discussed. The clinical utility of thrombophilia screening is also addressed.

Challenges in Treating Extensive Deep Vein Thrombosis with Severe Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome-A Follow-up of 2 Years

Thrombocytopenia is one of the most common manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). There is little evidence or definitive guidelines regarding the treatment of APS with thrombocytopenia. We describe a patient with APS and moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia and the challenges of balancing anticoagulation with thrombocytopenia. A 19-year-old male patient presented with right lower limb swelling to the emergency department with a history of gradually worsening right leg swelling for 1 week and was diagnosed with right leg proximal deep vein thrombosis. Ultrasound Doppler of the right lower limb revealed complete venous thrombosis from the level of the popliteal vein to the distal superficial femoral vein. Subsequently, he was found to have triple-positive APS and moderate-to-severe immune thrombocytopenia, with a platelet count nadir of 31 × 10 to the ninth power/L. He was started on anticoagulation with warfarin. The severe thrombocytopenia was not treated with immunosuppressants and the platelets fluctuated in the range of moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia but did not develop any rethrombotic or bleeding events. His platelets varied from 31 × 10 to the ninth power/L to 106 × 10 to the ninth power/L. This case report demonstrates that it may be safe to hold off treatment for thrombocytopenia in APS, even in cases of severe thrombocytopenia. Treatment with immunosuppressants may be instituted only when platelet levels fall below 20 × 10 to the ninth power/L or when there is clinically significant bleeding, as in primary immune thrombocytopenia.

Celiac trunk thrombosis in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome induced by median arcuate ligament compression: a case presentation and literature review

Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a rare disorder caused by the compression of the celiac axis by the fibrous structure of the diaphragm called the median arcuate ligament. Patients with MALS are usually undiagnosed unless characteristic symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, postprandial pain, and weight loss are presented. We report a case of a 29-year-old patient diagnosed with MALS and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) that developed celiac trunk, common hepatic artery and splenic artery thrombosis. There is not enough information on MALS as a trigger of thrombosis in predisposed patients such as those with APS. However, the case gives rise to suspicion and highlights the diagnostic processes, especially for patients with APS presenting postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss. This review likewise aims at the importance of Doppler ultrasonography as a screening tool and computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) both in the angiography variant, especially to diagnose confirmation and underlying treatment options.

Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome misclassification in an academic health system

PURPOSE

Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS) is a complex autoimmune disorder that includes a combination of laboratory criteria and clinical events (thrombosis, pregnancy complications). Accurate classification is essential, as APS patients may have limited oral anticoagulant options and requires indefinite anticoagulation. The prevalence of inaccurate APS misclassification is unknown. This study sought to determine the proportion of patients in an academic health-system who formally met APS criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included any patient within the University of Utah Health system who had an International Classification of Diseases-10 code for APS, between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2020. Manual chart review was performed to assess the appropriateness of the APS classification by laboratory and clinical criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 184 patients identified, 59 (32.1 %) formally met APS criteria, while 69 (37.5 %) did not meet criteria. The remaining 56 (30.4 %) patients lacked enough information in their medical records to decide on appropriateness of APS classification. The most prevalent reason for inappropriate APS classification in the 69 patients identified was incorrect interpretation of lab values as positive (62; 89.9 %), followed by lack of repeat confirmation testing (32; 46.4 %).

CONCLUSION

The results of this single-center study indicate that only one-third of patients with presumed APS met classification criteria. This was predominantly due to incorrect collection or interpretation of APS laboratory data. One-third had insufficient medical record data to determine APS classification, which impairs clinical decision-making. This suggests more education or implementation of anticoagulation stewardship is needed to ensure accurate APS classification and proper management of anticoagulation therapy.

Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Unmet Needs and Review of the Literature

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) require long-term anticoagulation due to the high-thrombotic recurrence risk. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been traditionally considered the standard of care in thrombotic APS. Nevertheless, the risk of recurrence persists with VKA. There are publications considering different intensities of anticoagulation with VKA; however, the standard-intensity anticoagulation (international normalized ratio between 2.0 and 3.0) is the most recommended. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the role of antiplatelet treatment in thrombotic APS. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as an alternative to VKA for many indications. There are, however, discrepancies regarding the management with NOACs in thrombotic APS. In this review, we update the different clinical trials with NOACs in venous, arterial, and microvascular thrombosis and suggest how these patients should be managed in agreement with the expert panels. Although scarce data are published regarding the current role of NOACs in thrombotic APS, the clinical trials failed to demonstrate noninferiority of NOACs compared with VKA, especially in patients with triple antiphospholipid antibodies positivity and/or arterial thrombosis. Single or double antiphospholipid positivity should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. In addition, we focus on different areas of uncertainty that still remain in thrombotic APS and NOACs. To summarize, emerging clinical trials are needed to provide robust data on the management of thrombotic APS.

Diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis: a summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN)

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most frequent serious manifestation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Up to 60% of SLE patients develop LN, which has a significant impact on their quality of life and prognosis. Recent advances have improved the diagnostic approach to LN, and new drugs that block specific pathways and kidney damage progression have been developed. Several randomized and well-powered clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of these agents in terms of proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function in the medium and long term, with an acceptable safety profile and good tolerance. The combination of different therapies allows for reduction of the dose and duration of corticosteroids and other potentially toxic therapies and leads to an increase in the number of patients achieving complete remission of the disease. This consensus document carried out by the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) provides practical and updated recommendations, based on the best available evidence and clinical expertise of participating nephrologists.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: State of the Art of Clinical Management

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder clinically characterized by recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Currently, treatment is mainly focused on anticoagulation, but therapies targeting mechanisms involved in APS autoimmune pathogenesis could play an important role in specific settings. An evidence-based therapeutic approach is limited by the broad clinical spectrum of the syndrome and the nature of a "rare disease" that makes it difficult to carry out well-designed prospective studies. Vitamin K antagonists (AVK), notably warfarin, are the standard treatment for preventing recurrent venous thrombosis and perhaps also arterial thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not recommended at least in patients with triple positivity APS. Treatment options for the prevention of pregnancy complications in obstetric APS, as combined use of aspirin and heparin, low-dose prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), may improve pregnancy outcome. The catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is the most severe form of APS with acute multiple organ involvement and small vessel thrombosis. Glucocorticoids, heparin, plasma exchange or IVIG, rituximab, or eculizumab must be added to concurrent treatment of precipitating factors (e.g. infections) as rescue therapies. Finally, it has been observed that SARS COV2 infection may produce vascular complications mimicking the clinical and pathophysiological features of APS and particularly of CAPS. From this point of view, attention has been focused on the "protective" role of anticoagulant therapy in preventing thrombotic complication when these clinical conditions coexist.

A Patient with Recurrent Strokes: Approach to Coagulopathy

Despite anticoagulation recommendations, patients may present with recurrent events. While medication adherence is always a concern, assessment of anticoagulation failure demands a systematic approach, taking into account the potential limitations of anticoagulants and a review of differential diagnoses for comorbidities. We illustrate our approach in a case presentation.

Antithrombotic therapy in antiphospholipid syndrome with arterial thrombosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Introduction

The optimal secondary thromboprophylactic strategies for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and arterial thrombosis remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of various antithrombotic strategies in APS with arterial thrombosis.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from inception until 30 September 2022, with no language restrictions. The inclusion criteria for eligible studies were as follows: inclusion of APS patients with arterial thrombosis, treatment with either antiplatelet agents, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), or a combination of these therapies, and reporting of recurrent thrombotic events.

Results

We conducted a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) involving 13 studies with a total of 719 participants, comprising six randomized and seven non-randomized studies. In comparison to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), the combined use of antiplatelet and warfarin demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent overall thrombosis, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.41 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.85). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) showed a lower risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis compared to SAPT although the difference did not reach statistical significance, with an RR of 0.29 (95% CI 0.08 to 1.07). DOAC was associated with a significant increase in the risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis, with an RR of 4.06 (95% CI 1.33 to 12.40) when compared to SAPT. There was no significant difference in major bleeding among various antithrombotic strategies.

Discussion

Based on this NMA, the combination of warfarin and antiplatelet therapy appears to be an effective approach in preventing recurrent overall thrombosis in APS patients with a history of arterial thrombosis. While DAPT may also show promise in preventing recurrent arterial thrombosis, further studies are needed to confirm its efficacy. Conversely, the use of DOACs was found to significantly increase the risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review

The objective of the systematic review is to analyze the efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in the prophylaxis of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We searched for clinical trials, cohort studies and meta-analyses published from January 1, 2012 to September 30, 2022. Articles that analyzed the efficacy of DOAC in the prevention of thrombosis recurrence, with or without comparison with antivitamin K (VKA) drugs, were selected. DOACs, specifically rivaroxaban and apixaban, were significantly less effective than VKAs in preventing recurrence of thrombosis in patients with APS and prior arterial thrombosis or the concomitant presence of two or three different antiphospholipid antibodies. The proportion of patients with severe bleeding as side effect are similar in those treated with DOAC and with VKA. The results argue against the use of DOAC in the treatment of patients with thrombotic APS.

Hallux Partial Necrosis Associated with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Importance of Early Accurate Diagnosis

This study highlights the importance of having a high clinical suspicion of hypercoagulopathy such as antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in podiatric patients with normal foot pulses and normal standard coagulation tests. APS is an autoimmune disease that is characterized by inflammatory thrombosis in the arteries and veins and obstetric complications such as pregnancy loss. APS usually affects vessels of the lower extremities. We report herein the case of a 46-year-old woman with previous episodes of pre-eclampsia who suffered from partial ischemic necrosis of the hallux of the left foot. After several ischemic episodes of the hallux, with increased risk of toe amputation, the patient was finally diagnosed with APS and treated with specific anticoagulant medication. The patient's symptoms subsided, and toe amputation was prevented. Early accurate diagnosis and appropriate clinical management are critical to providing optimal outcomes and reducing the risk of amputation.

A Review of Systemic Hematological Manifestations and Stent Thrombosis

Stent thrombosis (ST) has significant morbidity and mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). ST is uncommon making the identification of nonprocedural predictors challenging. Numerous case reports of ST in both benign and malignant hematological conditions exist. Given ST could be a Herald event of an undiagnosed condition and condition-specific treatment may be available, it is important to consider specialist testing in an unexplained ST. This review included a case presentation of ST in previously undiagnosed paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and a literature review of ST in other acquired thrombophilias including myeloproliferative disorders (MPNs), antiphospholipid syndrome, hematological malignancies, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Inherited thrombophilias and common pitfalls in thrombophilia and coagulation testing are also discussed. The cardiac-hematology landscape is becoming increasingly complex and there is a paucity of how to best manage ST in these patients. There is clear variability in practice and the use of multidisciplinary input between cardiologists and hematologists is essential.

Consensus document of the Spanish Group for the Study of the Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) for the diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis

A significant number of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (between 20% and 60% according to different reported series) develop lupus nephritis in the course of its evolution, which directly influences their quality of life and vital prognosis. In recent years, the greater knowledge about the pathogenesis of systemic lupus and lupus nephritis has allowed relevant advances in the diagnostic approach and treatment of these patients, achieving the development of drugs specifically aimed at blocking key pathogenic pathways of the disease. Encouragingly, these immunomodulatory agents have shown in well-powered, randomized clinical trials good clinical efficacy in the medium-term, defined as proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function, with an acceptable safety profile and good patient tolerability. All this has made it possible to reduce the use of corticosteroids and other potentially more toxic therapies, as well as to increase the use of combined therapies. The present consensus document carried out by the Glomerular Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (GLOSEN), collects in a practical and summarized, but rigorous way, the best currently available evidence about the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of lupus nephritis patients, including cases of special situations, with the main objective of providing updated information and well-founded clinical recommendations to treating physicians, to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to our patients.

Cilioretinal artery occlusion in antiphospholipid syndrome and the decision to anticoagulate

A patient in her late 50s with antiphospholipid syndrome presented to general ophthalmology clinic for annual hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening. She had taken 400 mg hydroxychloroquine daily for over a decade. She denied any visual changes and visual acuity was 20/20. Her examination and fundus photos were normal, but macular optical coherence tomography of the right eye demonstrated inner retinal atrophy and visual field tests revealed a corresponding paracentral scotoma, consistent with a prior cilioretinal artery occlusion. Prior testing from visits with other ophthalmologists revealed that this occlusion had occurred previously, but she had only been informed of not having hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. The possibility of vision loss prompted her to reconsider her prior decision to discontinue anticoagulation. This case demonstrates how anchoring bias may lead clinicians astray, and how the risk of blindness is a strong motivator for patients regarding anticoagulation.

Research trends and frontiers on antiphospholipid syndrome: A 10-year bibliometric analysis (2012-2021)

Objectives: A growing body of studies related to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been published in recent years. Nevertheless, there is a lack of visualized and systematic analysis in the literature on APS. Hence, this study sought to conduct a bibliometric analysis to identify research status and discover frontiers in the field. Methods: Articles and reviews concerning APS were acquired from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. CiteSpace, VOSviewer and a bibliometric online analysis platform were employed to conduct a visualization and knowledge-map analysis. Results: A total of 1,390 publications regarding APS were identified. Globally, Italy contributed the most publications. The University of Padua was the most productive institution. Lupus ranked first in both the most published and most co-cited journals. Savino Sciascia and Spiros Miyakis were the most prolific and most co-cited authors, respectively. "Vitamin K antagonists (VKA)" and "immunoglobulin A (IgA)" were current research foci. Burst analysis of keywords suggested that "neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)," "direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)," "open label," "outcome," "hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)," and "arterial thrombosis (AT)" were significant future research frontiers. Conclusion: The scientific literature on APS has increased steadily in the past 10 years. The clinical studies on the treatment and mechanism research of APS are recognized as promising research hotspots in the domain of APS. The research status and trends of APS publications from the bibliometric perspective can provide a practical guide and important reference for subsequent studies by researchers and physicians in the domain.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus Vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thromboprophylaxis is the cornerstone strategy for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Data comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in APS patients remain contentious. We aim to review and analyse literature on the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs in treating patients with APS. A literature search was performed from inception to 31 December 2021. Subgroups were analysed based on the risk stratification of APS profiles and different DOAC types. A total of nine studies with 1131 patients were included in the meta-analysis. High-risk APS patients (triple positive APS) who used DOACs displayed an increased risk of recurrent thrombosis [risk ratio = 3.65, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-8.93; I2  = 29%, P  = 0.005] compared with those taking VKAs. Similar risk of recurrent thrombosis or major bleeding was noted in low-risk APS patients (single or double antibody-positive) upon administering DOACs or VKAs. The utilization of Rivaroxaban was associated with a high risk of recurrent thromboses (RR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.56-4.42; I2  = 0, P  = 0.0003), particularly recurrent arterial thromboses (RR = 4.52; 95% CI: 1.99-10.29; I2  = 0, P  = 0.18) in overall APS patients. Comparisons of the rate of recurrent thrombosis events and major bleeding events when using dabigatran or apixaban versus VKAs yielded no statistical differences. In the absence of contraindications, this meta-analysis suggests that VKAs remain the first-choice treatment for high-risk APS patients, with DOACs a more appropriate option for low-risk APS patients. Different DOACs may exhibit different levels of efficacy and safety for thromboprophylaxis in APS patients and require further exploration.

Antiphospholipid syndrome with renal and splenic infarction after blunt trauma: A case report

BACKGROUND

In trauma patients, bleeding is an immediate major concern. At the same time, there are few cases of acute vascular occlusion after blunt trauma, and it is unclear what assessment and diagnosis should be considered for these cases. Herein, we describe a patient diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome after a hypercoagulable workup for acute renal and splenic vascular occlusion due to blunt trauma.

CASE SUMMARY

A 20-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain after hitting a tree while riding a sled 10 h ago. He had no medical history. Radiological investigations revealed occlusion of the left renal artery with global infarction of the left kidney and occlusion of branches of the splenic artery with infarction of the central portion of the spleen. Attempted revascularization of the left renal artery occlusion through percutaneous transluminal angioplasty failed due to difficulty in passing the wire through the total occlusion. Considering the presence of acute multivascular occlusions in a young man with low cardiovascular risk, additional laboratory tests were performed to evaluate hypercoagulability. The results suggested a high possibility of antiphospholipid syndrome. Treatment with a subcutaneous injection of enoxaparin was started and changed to oral warfarin after two weeks. The diagnosis was confirmed, and he continued to visit the rheumatology outpatient clinic while taking warfarin.

CONCLUSION

A hypercoagulable workup can be considered in trauma patients with acute multivascular occlusion, especially in young patients with low cardiovascular risk.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with single antibody-positive anti-phospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) remains unclear. Warfarin has been shown to be superior to DOACs among high-risk APLS patients (particularly those with triple-positive APLS). However, it remains unknown whether DOACs may be appropriate for lower-risk patients such as those with single-positive APLS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study comparing the risk of recurrent thrombosis among single-positive APLS patients treated with DOACs (apixaban or rivaroxaban), and those treated with warfarin.

RESULTS

One-hundred-forty-three single-positive APLS patients, newly started on anticoagulation following a first thrombotic event, were included. Median follow-up was 54 months (IQR 29-73 months). Ninety-one patients (64%) received warfarin and 52 patients (36%) received a DOAC. Six patients (6.6%) who received warfarin experienced a recurrent thrombotic event compared with 3 of 52 (5.8%) patients who received a DOAC (p = .845). There was no difference in event-free survival between groups (HR DOAC:Warfarin = 0.952, 95% CI 0.232 - 3.908). Major bleeding was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that DOACs may be a safe and effective option for patients with single-positive APLS. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Patterns of Recurrent Thrombosis in Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Multicenter, Real-Life Long-Term Follow-Up

Background

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired hypercoagulable condition associated with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) presence. Data on re-thrombosis following APS-diagnosis are limited.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of new thrombotic events among primary APS (pAPS) patients followed for up to 15 years in three medical centers in Israel.

Results

Among 312 primary-APS patients, 143 (46%) had new thrombotic event classified to three patterns: (1) Arterial—associated with heart valve disease (OR 7.24, 95% C.I. 2.26–24.6), hypertension (OR 3, 95% C.I. 1.44–6.25), elevated anti-B2-GPI IgM (OR 1.04, 95% C.I. 0.996–1.08), arterial thrombosis at presentation (OR 1.74 95% C.I. 0.992–3.26), and older age (41 vs. 34 years, p < 0.001). (2) Venous—linked with venous thrombosis at presentation (OR 12.9, 95% C.I. 5.27–31.6, p < 0.001), heart valve disease (OR 9.81 95% C.I. 1.82–52.9, p = 0.018), aGAPSS (OR 1.15 95% C.I. 1.02–1.29), and younger age (31 vs. 36.5 years, p = 0.001); and (3) Combined pattern—associated with heart valve disease (OR 40.5 95% C.I. 7.7–212) and pulmonary embolism (OR 7.47 95% C.I. 1.96–28.5). A 4th variant “the Breakthrough pattern” defined by re-thrombosis despite prophylactic therapy was observed in 100/143 (70%) patients and linked with heart valve disease (OR 8. 95% C.I. 2.43–26.3), venous thrombosis at presentation (OR 2.61 95% C.I. 1.47–4.66), leg ulcers (OR 12.2, 95% C.I. 1.4–107), hypertension (OR 1.99, 95% C.I. 0.92–4.34), and higher aGAPSS (OR 1.08, 95% C.I. 0.99–1.18).

Conclusion

In this real-life observation, re-thrombosis was common among pAPS patients including in those recommended to receive prophylactic therapy. Different patterns of recurrence were identified and linked with presenting symptoms, specific serological markers, APS manifestations, and comorbidities. Studies that will address interventions to prevent recurrences of APS-related events are needed.

Recurrent strokes and memory loss in a patient with triple-positive antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome may cause recurrent thromboembolic events of the microvasculature, arteries and veins. It is also characterised by a range of neurological and psychiatric dysfunctions, as well as complications during pregnancy. Patients with triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome have persistently elevated levels of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I (B2GPI) and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). These patients also have a higher risk of initial or recurrent thrombosis.We report the case of a 36-year-old man who was presented with progressive memory loss and recurrent stroke. He had persistently elevated antiphospholipid antibody titres (LA, aCL-immunoglobulin G and B2GPI antibodies). These features persisted while the patient was receiving low-dose aspirin (LDA), 81mg daily. Vitamin K antagonist (VKA); warfarin, with the international normalised ratio (INR) maintained at 2-3 was then added to his treatment regimen. The VKA dose was maintained at - a higher therapeutic INR while LDA administration was continued to achieve resolution of the patient's symptoms.

CoaguChek® XS versus standard laboratory prothrombin time for anticoagulant monitoring in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Prothrombin time, and its corresponding international normalized ratio (INR), is the laboratory test routinely performed to assess anticoagulation. Self-management of VKA therapy using point-of-care (POC) devices seems to be an attractive option.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of a POC device (CoaguChek XS) in APS patients by comparing it with venous laboratory INR. Furthermore, we analyzed whether other clinical and laboratory features could interfere with the CoaguChek XS results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a single-center cross-sectional study with 94 APS patients from a tertiary rheumatology clinic performed from August 2014 to March 2015. The comparison between CoaguChek XS and venous laboratory INR results was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (r) followed by the Bland-Altman test. A paired t-test was also applied. A difference of up to ±0.5 INR unit between the two systems was considered clinically acceptable.

RESULTS

The mean CoaguChek-INR was 2.94 ± 1.41 and venous laboratory INR was 2.43±0.86, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.95. Categorizing INR values in ranges (INR <2, INR 2-3, INR 3-4, and INR >4), we found that the INR >4 group presented a lower correlation (r = 0.64) compared to the other ranges (p < 0.05). Although both methods were highly correlated, CoaguChek XS showed higher values than the venous laboratory INR, with an increased average of 0.42 ± 0.54. Therefore, we proposed a simple linear regression model to predict the venous laboratory INR values, using results obtained from CoaguChek XS. A difference ≤0.5 INR unit between the two systems was observed in 57.4% of patients, and the aPL profile did not influence the results.

CONCLUSION

Although CoaguChek XS and venous laboratory INR demonstrated a good linear correlation in the group of INR ≤4, extra caution should be taken in APS patients, since a reasonable proportion of patients can present differences in INR results that are not acceptable. We do not recommend routine POC in APS patients.

Practical Considerations for Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Children

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide an attractive alternative for the management and prevention of thrombosis in pediatric patients. With multiple ongoing and published pediatric trials and recent regulatory approval of dabigatran and rivaroxaban, the landscape of pediatric anticoagulation is rapidly changing. However, as pediatricians gain experience with these drugs, it is important to be mindful of pediatric-specific considerations that may limit the use of DOACs in certain children and adolescents. While there is increasing adult data and experience, there is a paucity of real-world evidence to guide the use of these drugs in children who would not have met clinical trial inclusion criteria. In this mini review, we summarize pediatric specific data, areas for future research, and practical considerations for the use of DOACs in children and adolescents.

Managing Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Current and Future Prospects

Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare acquired multisystem autoimmune thromboinflammatory condition characterized by thrombotic and non-thrombotic clinical manifestations. APS in children and adolescents typically presents with large-vessel thrombosis, thrombotic microangiopathy, and, rarely, obstetric morbidity. Non-thrombotic clinical manifestations are frequently seen in pediatric APS and may be present even before the vascular thrombotic events occur. We review insights into the pathogenesis of APS and discuss potential targets for therapy. The identification of multiple immunologic abnormalities in patients with APS reveals molecular targets for current or future treatment. Management strategies, especially for APS in adolescents, require screening for additional prothrombotic risk factors and consideration of counseling regarding contraceptive strategies, lifestyle recommendations, treatment adherence, and mental health issues associated with this autoimmune thrombophilia. The main goal of therapy in pediatric APS is the prevention of thrombosis. The management of acute thrombosis events in children and adolescents is the same as for primary APS, which involves isolated occurrences, and secondary APS, which is seen in association with another autoimmune disease, e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus. A pediatric hematologist should be consulted so other differential thrombophilic conditions can be eliminated. Therapy includes unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists. Treatment of catastrophic APS involves triple therapy (anticoagulation, intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy, and plasma exchange) and may include intravenous immunoglobulin for children and adolescents with this condition. New drugs such as eculizumab and sirolimus seem to be promising drugs for APS.

Evaluation of Apixaban in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Series and Review of Literature

Several guidelines endorsed the indefinite use warfarin or heparin-containing products for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and secondary prevention and discouraged the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, adequate anticoagulation despite warfarin therapy remains a challenge in APS patients. Using DOACs in APS patients is seen in clinical practice, despite the lack of evidence to support their use in this population. In this case series, we aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apixaban use in nine patients with primary or secondary APS at King Abdulaziz Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). All patients presented with APS and received apixaban with or without concomitant antiplatelet. Three patients had double positivity, and two patients had triple positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Some patients tolerated apixaban during the follow-up period, but recurrent VTE and stroke were reported in some of them. Bleeding complications were evident in some cases as well. In conclusion, warfarin remains the best choice to prevent VTE recurrence in patients with APS. On the other side, apixaban use in patients with APS may have some safety and effectiveness concerns evidenced by VTE recurrence and bleeding complications. The safety and effectiveness of utilizing apixaban in APS patients need to be assessed in well-controlled randomized trials.

The digestive system involvement of antiphospholipid syndrome: pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment strategies

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease mainly characterised by vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. APS has broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. The digestive system involvement of antiphospholipid syndrome is a critical but under-recognised condition. Digestive system involvement may be the result of direct (autoimmune-mediated) or indirect (thrombotic) mechanisms. Liver is the most commonly involved organ, followed by intestines, oesophagus, stomach, pancreas and spleen. This review describes possible digestive system manifestations in APS patients, and illustrates the epidemiology and possible pathophysiology of APS. The role of different treatment strategies in the management of digestive system manifestations of APS were also discussed.Key messagesAntiphospholipid syndrome is a multi-organ, multi-system disease and its clinical manifestation spectrum is gradually expanding. Since the first diagnosis of APS, the clinical manifestations of digestive system have been reported successively. This narrative review describes the major digestive system manifestations of APS and illustrates the epidemiology, pathophysiology and the role of therapeutic strategies of these patients.

Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulation Agents as Thromboprophylaxis in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder that causes venous, arterial and small-vessel thrombosis, pregnancy loss, and premature birth. Cardiac valvular disease, renal thrombotic microangiopathy, thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and cognitive impairment are some of its other clinical symptoms. Antiphospholipid antibodies cause endothelial cells, monocytes, and platelets to become activated, as well as an increase in tissue factor and thromboxane A2. Complement activation might play a key function in pathogenesis. Long-term oral anticoagulation is used to treat thrombosis, and individuals having arterial episodes should be treated quickly. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), as well as those with solely obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome, should get primary thromboprophylaxis. Obstetric care is based on a combination of medical and obstetric high-risk management, as well as aspirin and heparin therapy. Possible supplementary therapy for this condition is hydroxychloroquine. Statins, rituximab, and novel anticoagulant medicines are all potential future treatments for non-pregnant individuals with antiphospholipid syndrome. We aim to review the role of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as thromboprophylactic drugs in the treatment of APS in this article. The treatment of venous thromboembolism has been transformed by a new class of DOACs. These drugs, such as rivaroxaban, function by inhibiting factor Xa directly. Not only do they have known anticoagulant actions, but they also obviate the need for dosage monitoring and modification, in contrast to warfarin. We conducted an exhaustive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar Indexes using the keywords "Antiphospholipid syndrome," "thromboprophylaxis," and "oral anticoagulants" up to September 2021. We found that DOACs have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin in a variety of anticoagulation situations in a number of high-powered clinical studies. In many hypercoagulable conditions such as APS, DOACs are quickly establishing themselves as first-line therapy. This article is focused on comprehensively reviewing the mechanism of action of DOACs, their role as thromboprophylactic drugs, risks and complications of DOACs, and comparing their efficacy with the standard treatment protocol and warfarin.

Management of stroke in patients on antithrombotic therapy: Practical issues in the era of direct oral anticoagulants

Antithrombotic drugs (ADs) are the mainstay of secondary prevention of thrombotic vascular diseases. Management of patients under long-term treatment with ADs admitted for acute cerebrovascular disease, either ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), has become a frequent situation that might influence decision-making processes from diagnosis to therapeutic strategies. The aim of this review is to summarize current data from the literature to help clinicians in their decisions for stroke care in patients taking ADs. While a large body of data have made it possible to codify the management of patients presenting IS or ICH under antiplatelet drugs and vitamin K antagonists, the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) and future development of new antiplatelet drugs raise new problems. Development of rapid assessment tools measuring specific biological activity and reversion agents dedicated to each class of DOAs should make it possible to optimize individual therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the main steps of IS and ICH management from early identification of ADs, and use of dedicated biological assays, to the stepwise strategy to apply revascularization or reversal therapies and finally the resumption of ADs with a focus on individual clinical and radiological characteristics for more personalized care.

Effectiveness and safety of the direct oral anticoagulants in non-triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome without prior arterial thromboembolism

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is an autoimmune disorder that manifests with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and/or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Recent trials have failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists as anticoagulation in TAPS, but there is a subgroup of non-triple positive patients without prior ATE in who only limited data exists. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in non-triple positive TAPS without prior ATE. We conducted a retrospective review of all non-triple positive TAPS patients without prior ATE who were anticoagulated with a DOAC at two tertiary care hospitals from January 2010 to July 2020. We assessed outcomes of VTE, ATE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). 50 patients were included in the analysis, encompassing 157.2 years of patient follow-up. There were no recurrent VTE, but one patient had a possible arterial thrombosis (0.64 events per 100 patient-years [95% confidence interval (CI 0.16-35.49)] as a transient ischemic attack (TIA) which occurred on reduced dose DOAC. There were no major bleeding events, but two patients had CRNMB (1.27 events per 100 patient-years [95% CI 1.5-46.0]), both as menorrhagia. DOACs were effective and safe as anticoagulation in non-triple positive TAPS patients without prior ATE with a low rate of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding. Larger, prospective controlled studies are required to confirm these findings prior to routine use of DOACs in this subgroup.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite vitamin K antagonists (VKA) being the gold standard in the prevention of thromboembolic events in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants/direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used off-label.

Objective

We aimed to perform a systematic review comparing DOACs to VKA regarding prevention of thromboembolic events, occurrence of bleeding events and mortality in patients with APS.

Methods

An electronic database search was performed through MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science. After data extraction, we pooled the results using risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I². The outcomes considered were all thromboembolic events as primary, and major bleeding, all bleeding events and mortality as secondary. Evidence confidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.

Results

We included 7 studies and a total of 835 patients for analyses. Thromboembolic events were significantly increased in DOACs arm, compared with VKA—RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.62, I²—24%, n=719, 6 studies. In studies using exclusively rivaroxaban, which was the most representative drug in all included studies, the thromboembolic risk was increased threefold (RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.53 to 7.37). The risks of major bleeding, all bleeding events and mortality were not significantly different from control arm. The grade of certainty of our results is very low.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests DOACs use, particularly rivaroxaban, among patients with APS, is less effective than VKA since it is associated with 69% increased risk of thromboembolic events.

Trial registration number

CRD42020216178.

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the International Guidelines

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) requires long-term anticoagulation to prevent recurrent thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used in APS patients, but contradictory guidelines recommendations on their use do exist. We performed a systematic review of literature including studies investigating the role of DOACs in APS patients. At this aim, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 14 studies which investigated the use of DOACs in patients with APS, of which 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 1 post-hoc analysis of 3 RCTs, 7 case series and 3 cohort studies (2 prospective and 1 retrospective). Among DOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used (n = 531), followed by dabigatran (n = 90) and apixaban (n = 46). Regarding guidelines indications, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines recommend against the use of DOACs in all APS patients. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), British Society for Haematology (BSH), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidance provided more detailed indications stating that warfarin should be the first-choice treatment but DOACs may be considered in patients (1) already on a stable anticoagulation with a DOAC, (2) with low-quality anticoagulation by warfarin, (3) unwilling/unable to undergo INR monitoring, (4) with contraindications or serious adverse events under warfarin. Patients with arterial APS or triple positivity should be treated with warfarin while venous APS with single or double positivity may be candidate to DOACs, but high-quality studies are needed.

[Actual use of direct oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease]

Direct oral anticoagulants recently became the first-line choice for anticoagulation in venous thromboembolic disease. Many studies have shown its non-inferiority regarding the risk of thromboembolic recurrence compared to anti-vitamin K without increasing the risk of bleeding in the general population. However, specific populations such as patients with cancer, patients with kidney failure, patients with constitutional thrombophilia, elderly patients, or patients with extreme weight are at risk of intolerance to the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Precautions in use may be necessary as discussed in recently published guidelines about antiphospholipid syndrome. This review aims to list the main clinical trials investigating direct oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease in the general population and populations at risk, as well as to provide an update on current international and French guidelines.

Arterial Thrombosis in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review and Meta-Analysis

There is a scarcity of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antithrombotic regimens for secondary prevention of arterial thrombosis (AT) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We reviewed different antithrombotic regimens used for this purpose. We searched for studies on management of AT in APS on PubMed and Web of Science. Eleven studies (5 RCTs, 3 prospective, and 3 retrospective cohort studies) comparing different regimens and reporting outcomes specifically for patients with index AT events were identified. Treatments were vitamin K antagonists (VKA; 9 studies), non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC; 3 studies), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT; 7 studies), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; 2 studies), and VKA combined with SAPT (4 studies). We performed a meta-analysis for the outcomes: recurrent AT, any (arterial or venous) recurrent thromboembolism, and major bleeding. Recurrent AT was reduced with VKA plus SAPT versus VKA (risk ratio [RR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.85) and with DAPT versus SAPT (RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.99). Any recurrent thromboembolism was reduced with VKA plus SAPT versus VKA alone (RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24-0.69) and versus SAPT alone (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.13-0.96). There were no significant differences between other treatments for thromboembolism and for none of the comparisons regarding major bleeding. In a sensitivity analysis, excluding low-quality studies, VKA was more effective than NOAC to prevent recurrent AT (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07-0.93). Combined antithrombotic therapy might be more effective than single agents as secondary prophylaxis in APS with AT, and does not seem to compromise with safety, but the quality of evidence is generally low. NOACs should be avoided for patients with APS and AT.

Massive thrombosis and phlegmasia cerulea dolens while taking rivaroxaban: case report and review

Our study describes a fatal case of phlegmasia cerulea dolens and massive venous thrombosis in a patient taking rivaroxaban regularly to treat cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Blood tests samples were positive for lupus anticoagulant. The unique evolution of the case, as well as the positivity for lupus anticoagulant, raises the possibility of an acquired hypercoagulation syndrome. We highlight the fact that the test recommended as the first line for lupus anticoagulant diagnosis (dilute Russell viper venom time) is the most affected by rivaroxaban, leading to a high prevalence of false-positive results. We also discuss potential diagnoses for the current case and review the current state-of-the-art of use of the novel oral anticoagulation agents in this unusual situation. So far, there are no recommendations to use such agents as first options in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or in hypercoagulation syndromes.

Ischemic Stroke in the Young

The purpose of this article is to address several challenging questions in the management of young patients (those age 60 and under) who present with ischemic stroke. Do genetic thrombophilic states, strongly associated with venous thrombosis, independently cause arterial events in adults? Should cases of patent foramen ovale be closed with mechanical devices in patients with cryptogenic stroke? What are the optimal treatments for cerebral vein thrombosis, carotid artery dissection, and antiphospholipid syndrome and are DOACs acceptable treatment for these indications? What is the mechanism underlying large vessel stroke in patients with COVID-19? This is a narrative review. We searched PubMed and Embase and American College of physicians Journal club database for English language articles since 2000 looking mainly at randomized clinical trials, Meta analyses, Cochran reviews as well as some research articles viewed to be cutting edge regarding anticoagulation and cerebrovascular disease. Searches were done entering cerebral vein thrombosis, carotid dissection, anticoagulation therapy and stroke, antiphospholipid antibody and stroke, stroke in young adults, cryptogenic stroke and anticoagulation, patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke, COVID-19 and stroke.

Gastrointestinal symptoms as the first manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome

Background

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired pre-thrombotic autoimmune condition, which produces autoantibodies called antiphospholipid antibodies (APL) against phospholipid-binding plasma proteins. The diagnosis of APS requires at least one of Sapporo standard clinical manifestations and one laboratory criteria (persistently medium/high titer anticardiolipin antibodies, and/or medium/high titer anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, and/or a positive lupus anticoagulant test). Gastrointestinal lesions are rarely reported in APS patients. APS cases with recurrent abdominal pain as the first clinical manifestation are even rarer.

Case presentation

This report describes an APS case with recurrent abdominal pain as the first clinical manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome. The patient has a history of two miscarriages. Computed tomography of the abdomen confirmed mesenteric thrombosis and intestinal obstruction while laboratory tests for serum antiphospholipid and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies were positive. This led to the diagnosis of APS.

Conclusions

This paper provides useful information on gastrointestinal manifestations and APS, also including a brief literature review about possible gastrointestinal symptoms of APS.

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: A review

The neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is a challenge for clinicians, both at a diagnostic and therapeutic level. Although in 1999 the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) proposed a set of definitions for 19 NPSLE syndromes, with the intention of homogenizing the terminology for research purposes and clinical practice, the prevalence of NPSLE varies widely according to different series and is estimated to be between 37 and 95%. This is due to multiple factors such as the unalike definitions used, the diverse design of the studies, type of population, race, type and severity of symptoms, and follow-up of the different cohorts of patients with SLE. In recent years, some authors have tried excluding minor neuropsychiatric manifestations in order to try to reduce this wide variation in the prevalence of NPSLE since they are very prevalent in the general population; others authors have developed various models for the attribution of neuropsychiatric events to SLE that can assist clinicians in this diagnostic process, and finally, some authors developed and validated in 2014 a new algorithm based on the definitions of the ACR that includes the evaluation of the patient's lupus activity together with imaging techniques and the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with the aim of trying to differentiate the true neuropsychiatric manifestations attributable to SLE. In 2010, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) developed recommendations for the management of NPSLE. We found abundant literature published later where, in addition to the recommendations for the management of the 19 NPSLE syndromes defined by the ACR, additional recommendations are given for other neurological and/or psychiatric syndromes, conditions, and complications that have been associated to SLE in recent years. We review below the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the different entities.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a retrospective study in a real-life patient cohort

The current mainstay for the treatment of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is under debate. We aimed to assess whether DOACs would be safe in APS patients presenting to the thrombosis clinic. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. All patients presenting to our thrombosis clinic between 2010 and 2017 with a diagnosis of APS taking either VKAs or DOACs were included. APS diagnosis was based on the revised Sapporo criteria. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the electronic and physical patient files. Out of 200 patients, 81 received VKAs, and 119 DOACs. The two cohorts did not differ with regard to their initial clinical manifestation or additional prothrombotic risk factors. Only a small minority of patients was antiphospholipid antibody triple positive (VKA, 7.0% vs. DOAC, 4.2%). Number of on-treatment events was low (3 vs. 2). The hazard ratio for any thromboembolic event for patients taking DOACs was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-5.19). Treatment with DOACs was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent thromboembolism in comparison with VKAs in this retrospective study. Our observation supports the assumption that in nontriple positive (low risk) APS patients, DOACs might be safe. Prospective data are urgently needed.

Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome (TRAPS): Two-year outcomes after the study closure

BACKGROUND

Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome was a prospective randomized, open-label, noninferiority study conducted in 14 centers in Italy. Rivaroxaban was compared with warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in high-risk, triple-positive patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to report the events during the 2-year follow-up after the study closure.

METHODS

On January 28, 2018, the trial was prematurely stopped by adjudication and safety committee for an excess of events in the rivaroxaban group. Randomized patients were advised on trial results and those randomized to rivaroxaban were solicited to switch to warfarin. All 14 participating centers were asked and accepted to follow their patients for clinical events. This report describes the rate of events that occurred between January 28, 2018, and January 28, 2020.

RESULTS

Of 120 randomized patients, 115 were available for follow-up. Outcome events were two in six (33.3%) patients who remained on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and six in 109 (5.7%) patients on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-34.5, P = .018). The two patients on DOACs (one taking dabigatran and one taking rivaroxaban) suffered from thromboembolic events, whereas of the six patients with composite outcomes on warfarin, three had thromboembolic events (HR for thrombosis 13.3; 95% CI 2.2-79.9, P = .005).

CONCLUSION

These data further support the use of warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: A practical guide to diagnosis and management

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterised by venous, arterial and/or small vessel thrombosis in the context of persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The diagnosis and management of thrombotic APS continues to prove challenging for clinicians. We provide a practical guide to the diagnosis of APS including who to test for aPL and which tests to do. We also consider clinical practice points on the management of venous, arterial and small vessel thrombosis, in the context of first and recurrent thrombotic events. Non-criteria manifestations of APS are reviewed. An approach to recurrent thrombosis and anticoagulant-refractory APS is discussed, with options including increasing the anticoagulation intensity of vitamin K antagonists, switching to low-molecular-weight-heparin, the use of fondaparinux and/or the addition of antiplatelet treatment. Adjunctive options such as vitamin D, hydroxychloroquine and statins are also addressed.

Off-label Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin for Left Ventricular Thrombi

Importance

Left ventricular (LV) thrombi can arise in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Anticoagulation is thought to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), but there are no high-quality data on the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for this indication.

Objective

To compare the outcomes associated with DOAC use and warfarin use for the treatment of LV thrombi.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A cohort study was performed at 3 tertiary care academic medical centers among 514 eligible patients with echocardiographically diagnosed LV thrombi between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019. Follow-up was performed through the end of the study period.

Exposures

Type and duration of anticoagulant use.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Clinically apparent SSE.

Results

A total of 514 patients (379 men; mean [SD] age, 58.4 [14.8] years) with LV thrombi were identified, including 300 who received warfarin and 185 who received a DOAC (64 patients switched treatment between these groups). The median follow-up across the patient cohort was 351 days (interquartile range, 51-866 days). On unadjusted analysis, DOAC treatment vs warfarin use (hazard ratio [HR], 2.71; 95% CI, 1.31-5.57; P = .01) and prior SSE (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.22-3.72; P = .01) were associated with SSE. On multivariable analysis, anticoagulation with DOAC vs warfarin (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.28-5.43; P = .01) and prior SSE (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.17-3.66; P = .01) remained significantly associated with SSE.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this multicenter cohort study of anticoagulation strategies for LV thrombi, DOAC treatment was associated with a higher risk of SSE compared with warfarin use, even after adjustment for other factors. These results challenge the assumption of DOAC equivalence with warfarin for LV thrombi and highlight the need for prospective randomized clinical trials to determine the most effective treatment strategies for LV thrombi.

Self-perceived quality of life of primary antiphospholipid syndrome patients using vitamin K antagonist

PURPOSE

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder clinically characterized by thromboembolic events or obstetric complications. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is the treatment of choice for PAPS patients with thrombosis. However, the efficacy of VKA therapy depends on laboratory monitoring, dose adjustment, adequate lifestyle and adherence to treatment. Difficulties with VKA therapy can affect patients' self-perceived health related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aims to evaluate PAPS patients' HRQOL, therapy adherence and knowledge of treatment.

METHODS

A general Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) were used to access APS-patients self-perceived HRQOL. Treatment adherence was measured by the Treatment Measure Adhesion (TMA) - oral anticoagulant version instrument, and knowledge of VKA treatment was measured using the MedTake test.

RESULTS

66 PAPS patients using VKA were assessed. 63% of them were female; the mean age was 41.9 years old, approximately 60% had unprovoked venous thrombosis and one third of the patients had recurrent thrombotic events. The most impacted domain of DASS was "psychological impacts" and the factors associated to anticoagulation related poor HRQOL were: female sex, presence of arterial thrombosis and INR lability. Using the SF-36 instrument, PAPS-patients self-perceived HRQOL was poorer than that of the general Brazilian population and was associated with female sex and presence of cardiovascular risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high adherence to treatment and knowledge of VKA therapy, self-perceived HRQOL is poor in patients with PAPS and is mainly affected by VKA therapy. Searching for better treatment options is warranted.

Treatment of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome in adults and children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), more common than once believed, is an autoimmune disease best known for its high risk of incident and recurrent thrombotic events. The approach to treatment potentially differs from treatment of thrombosis in the general population, and this article endeavors to review the latest updates on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

The epidemiology of APS is being increasingly elucidated by large population-based studies, with APS perhaps affecting as many as 1 in 2000 individuals. Vitamin K antagonists, aspirin, and heparinoids continue to have obvious roles in the management of patients with APS. There has recently been intensive study of direct oral anticoagulants in APS, with the most recent randomized studies raising concerns about their inferiority to vitamin K antagonists, at least in some subgroups. Other approaches to treating APS beyond anticoagulants and antiaggregants are also receiving increased attention in mechanistic and preclinical studies with an eye toward future roles in patients with refractory and/or microvascular disease. Pediatric APS is identified as an area in desperate need of additional prospective research.

SUMMARY

Progress continues to be made in pursuit of improving the lives of individuals afflicted with APS. The most important future directions would seem to involve leveraging modern molecular technologies in order to improve subphenotyping of antiphospholipid antibody-positive individuals. This will help personalize risk profiles and ideally define the optimal approach to therapy based on future risk, rather than past morbid events.