Closing the translation gap: AI applications in digital pathology

Bridging the Clinical-Computational Transparency Gap in Digital Pathology

CONTEXT.—

Computational pathology combines clinical pathology with computational analysis, aiming to enhance diagnostic capabilities and improve clinical productivity. However, communication barriers between pathologists and developers often hinder the full realization of this potential.

OBJECTIVE.—

To propose a standardized framework that improves mutual understanding of clinical objectives and computational methodologies. The goal is to enhance the development and application of computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) tools.

DESIGN.—

This article suggests pivotal roles for pathologists and computer scientists in the CAD development process. It calls for increased understanding of computational terminologies, processes, and limitations among pathologists. Similarly, it argues that computer scientists should better comprehend the true use cases of the developed algorithms to avoid clinically meaningless metrics.

RESULTS.—

CAD tools improve pathology practice significantly. Some tools have even received US Food and Drug Administration approval. However, improved understanding of machine learning models among pathologists is essential to prevent misuse and misinterpretation. There is also a need for a more accurate representation of the algorithms' performance compared to that of pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

A comprehensive understanding of computational and clinical paradigms is crucial for overcoming the translational gap in computational pathology. This mutual comprehension will improve patient care through more accurate and efficient disease diagnosis.

Making Pathologists Ready for the New Artificial Intelligence Era: Changes in Required Competencies

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in developing and using artificial intelligence (AI) models in pathology. Although pathologists generally have a positive attitude toward AI, they report a lack of knowledge and skills regarding how to use it in practice. Furthermore, it remains unclear what skills pathologists would require to use AI adequately and responsibly. However, adequate training of (future) pathologists is essential for successful AI use in pathology. In this paper, we assess which entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and associated competencies pathologists should acquire in order to use AI in their daily practice. We make use of the available academic literature, including literature in radiology, another image-based discipline, which is currently more advanced in terms of AI development and implementation. Although microscopy evaluation and reporting could be transferrable to AI in the future, most of the current pathologist EPAs and competencies will likely remain relevant when using AI techniques and interpreting and communicating results for individual patient cases. In addition, new competencies related to technology evaluation and implementation will likely be necessary, along with knowing one's own strengths and limitations in human-AI interactions. Because current EPAs do not sufficiently address the need to train pathologists in developing expertise related to technology evaluation and implementation, we propose a new EPA to enable pathology training programs to make pathologists fit for the new AI era "using AI in diagnostic pathology practice" and outline its associated competencies.

A deep learning approach to case prioritisation of colorectal biopsies

AIMS

To create and validate a weakly supervised artificial intelligence (AI) model for detection of abnormal colorectal histology, including dysplasia and cancer, and prioritise biopsies according to clinical significance (severity of diagnosis).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Triagnexia Colorectal, a weakly supervised deep learning model, was developed for the classification of colorectal samples from haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images. The model was trained on 24 983 digitised images and assessed by multiple pathologists in a simulated digital pathology environment. The AI application was implemented as part of a point and click graphical user interface to streamline decision-making. Pathologists assessed the accuracy of the AI tool, its value, ease of use and integration into the digital pathology workflow.

RESULTS

Validation of the model was conducted on two cohorts: the first, on 100 single-slide cases, achieved micro-average model specificity of 0.984, micro-average model sensitivity of 0.949 and micro-average model F1 score of 0.949 across all classes. A secondary multi-institutional validation cohort, of 101 single-slide cases, achieved micro-average model specificity of 0.978, micro-average model sensitivity of 0.931 and micro-average model F1 score of 0.931 across all classes. Pathologists reflected their positive impressions on the overall accuracy of the AI in detecting colorectal pathology abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a high-performing colorectal biopsy AI triage model that can be integrated into a routine digital pathology workflow to assist pathologists in prioritising cases and identifying cases with dysplasia/cancer versus non-neoplastic biopsies.

Publicly available datasets of breast histopathology H&E whole-slide images: A scoping review

Advancements in digital pathology and computing resources have made a significant impact in the field of computational pathology for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, access to high-quality labeled histopathological images of breast cancer is a big challenge that limits the development of accurate and robust deep learning models. In this scoping review, we identified the publicly available datasets of breast H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) that can be used to develop deep learning algorithms. We systematically searched 9 scientific literature databases and 9 research data repositories and found 17 publicly available datasets containing 10 385 H&E WSIs of breast cancer. Moreover, we reported image metadata and characteristics for each dataset to assist researchers in selecting proper datasets for specific tasks in breast cancer computational pathology. In addition, we compiled 2 lists of breast H&E patches and private datasets as supplementary resources for researchers. Notably, only 28% of the included articles utilized multiple datasets, and only 14% used an external validation set, suggesting that the performance of other developed models may be susceptible to overestimation. The TCGA-BRCA was used in 52% of the selected studies. This dataset has a considerable selection bias that can impact the robustness and generalizability of the trained algorithms. There is also a lack of consistent metadata reporting of breast WSI datasets that can be an issue in developing accurate deep learning models, indicating the necessity of establishing explicit guidelines for documenting breast WSI dataset characteristics and metadata.

Applications of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for a positive outcome. The integration of artificial intelligence in the pathology field is increasingly widespread, including histopathological images analysis. In recent years, the application of digital pathology technology emerged as a potential solution to enhance the understanding and management of gastric cancer. Through sophisticated image analysis algorithms, artificial intelligence technologies facilitate the accuracy and sensitivity of gastric cancer diagnosis and treatment and personalized therapeutic strategies. This review aims to evaluate the current landscape and future potential of artificial intelligence in transforming gastric cancer pathology, so as to provide ideas for future research.

Clinical implementation of artificial-intelligence-assisted detection of breast cancer metastases in sentinel lymph nodes: the CONFIDENT-B single-center, non-randomized clinical trial

Pathologists' assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) for breast cancer (BC) metastases is a treatment-guiding yet labor-intensive and costly task because of the performance of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in morphologically negative cases. This non-randomized, single-center clinical trial (International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number:14323711) assessed the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted workflow for detecting BC metastases in SNs while maintaining diagnostic safety standards. From September 2022 to May 2023, 190 SN specimens were consecutively enrolled and allocated biweekly to the intervention arm (n = 100) or control arm (n = 90). In both arms, digital whole-slide images of hematoxylin-eosin sections of SN specimens were assessed by an expert pathologist, who was assisted by the 'Metastasis Detection' app (Visiopharm) in the intervention arm. Our primary endpoint showed a significantly reduced adjusted relative risk of IHC use (0.680, 95% confidence interval: 0.347-0.878) for AI-assisted pathologists, with subsequent cost savings of ~3,000 €. Secondary endpoints showed significant time reductions and up to 30% improved sensitivity for AI-assisted pathologists. This trial demonstrates the safety and potential for cost and time savings of AI assistance.

Pros and cons of artificial intelligence implementation in diagnostic pathology

The rapid introduction of digital pathology has greatly facilitated development of artificial intelligence (AI) models in pathology that have shown great promise in assisting morphological diagnostics and quantitation of therapeutic targets. We are now at a tipping point where companies have started to bring algorithms to the market, and questions arise whether the pathology community is ready to implement AI in routine workflow. However, concerns also arise about the use of AI in pathology. This article reviews the pros and cons of introducing AI in diagnostic pathology.

Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology

Machine learning (ML) models are poised to transform surgical pathology practice. The most successful use attention mechanisms to examine whole slides, identify which areas of tissue are diagnostic, and use them to guide diagnosis. Tissue contaminants, such as floaters, represent unexpected tissue. Although human pathologists are extensively trained to consider and detect tissue contaminants, we examined their impact on ML models. We trained 4 whole-slide models. Three operate in placenta for the following functions: (1) detection of decidual arteriopathy, (2) estimation of gestational age, and (3) classification of macroscopic placental lesions. We also developed a model to detect prostate cancer in needle biopsies. We designed experiments wherein patches of contaminant tissue are randomly sampled from known slides and digitally added to patient slides and measured model performance. We measured the proportion of attention given to contaminants and examined the impact of contaminants in the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding feature space. Every model showed performance degradation in response to one or more tissue contaminants. Decidual arteriopathy detection--balanced accuracy decreased from 0.74 to 0.69 ± 0.01 with addition of 1 patch of prostate tissue for every 100 patches of placenta (1% contaminant). Bladder, added at 10% contaminant, raised the mean absolute error in estimating gestational age from 1.626 weeks to 2.371 ± 0.003 weeks. Blood, incorporated into placental sections, induced false-negative diagnoses of intervillous thrombi. Addition of bladder to prostate cancer needle biopsies induced false positives, a selection of high-attention patches, representing 0.033 mm2, and resulted in a 97% false-positive rate when added to needle biopsies. Contaminant patches received attention at or above the rate of the average patch of patient tissue. Tissue contaminants induce errors in modern ML models. The high level of attention given to contaminants indicates a failure to encode biological phenomena. Practitioners should move to quantify and ameliorate this problem.

Algorithm-assisted diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease - evaluation of robustness and comparative image analysis on data from various labs and slide scanners

BACKGROUND

Differences in the preparation, staining and scanning of digital pathology slides create significant pre-analytic variability. Algorithm-assisted tools must be able to contend with this variability in order to be applicable in clinical practice. In a previous study, a decision support algorithm was developed to assist in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. In the current study, we tested the robustness of this algorithm while assessing for pre-analytic factors which may affect its performance.

METHODS

The decision support algorithm was used on digital pathology slides obtained from four different medical centers (A-D) and scanned by three different scanner models (by Philips, Hamamatsu and 3DHISTECH). A total of 192 cases and 1782 slides were used in this study. RGB histograms were constructed to compare images from the various medical centers and scanner models and highlight the differences in color and contrast.

RESULTS

The algorithm was able to correctly identify ganglion cells in 99.2% of cases, from all medical centers (All scanned by the Philips slide scanner) as well as 95.5% and 100% of the slides scanned by the 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu brand slide scanners, respectively. The total error rate for center D was lower than the other medical centers (3.9% vs 7.1%, 10.8% and 6% for centers A-C, respectively), the vast majority of errors being false positives (3.45% vs 0.45% false negatives). The other medical centers showed a higher rate of false negatives in relation to false positives (6.81% vs 0.29%, 9.8% vs 1.2% and 5.37% vs 0.63% for centers A-C, respectively). The total error rates for the Philips, Hamamatsu and 3DHISTECH brand scanners were 3.9%, 3.2% and 9.8%, respectively. RGB histograms demonstrated significant differences in pixel value distribution between the four medical centers, as well as between the 3DHISTECH brand scanner when compared to the Philips and Hamamatsu brand scanners.

CONCLUSIONS

The results reported in this paper suggest that the algorithm-based decision support system has sufficient robustness to be applicable for clinical practice. In addition, the novel method used in its development - Hierarchial-Contexual Analysis (HCA) may be applicable to the development of algorithm-assisted tools in other diseases, for which available datasets are limited. Validation of any given algorithm-assisted support system should nonetheless include data from as many medical centers and scanner models as possible.

Digitization of Pathology Labs: A Review of Lessons Learned

Pathology laboratories are increasingly using digital workflows. This has the potential of increasing laboratory efficiency, but the digitization process also involves major challenges. Several reports have been published describing the individual experiences of specific laboratories with the digitization process. However, a comprehensive overview of the lessons learned is still lacking. We provide an overview of the lessons learned for different aspects of the digitization process, including digital case management, digital slide reading, and computer-aided slide reading. We also cover metrics used for monitoring performance and pitfalls and corresponding values observed in practice. The overview is intended to help pathologists, information technology decision makers, and administrators to benefit from the experiences of others and to implement the digitization process in an optimal way to make their own laboratory future-proof.

Leveraging Attention-Based Convolutional Neural Networks for Meningioma Classification in Computational Histopathology

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are becoming increasingly valuable tools for advanced computational histopathology, promoting precision medicine through exceptional visual decoding abilities. Meningiomas, the most prevalent primary intracranial tumors, necessitate accurate grading and classification for informed clinical decision-making. Recently, DNA methylation-based molecular classification of meningiomas has proven to be more effective in predicting tumor recurrence than traditional histopathological methods. However, DNA methylation profiling is expensive, labor-intensive, and not widely accessible. Consequently, a digital histology-based prediction of DNA methylation classes would be advantageous, complementing molecular classification. In this study, we developed and rigorously assessed an attention-based multiple-instance deep neural network for predicting meningioma methylation classes using tumor methylome data from 142 (+51) patients and corresponding hematoxylin-eosin-stained histological sections. Pairwise analysis of sample cohorts from three meningioma methylation classes demonstrated high accuracy in two combinations. The performance of our approach was validated using an independent set of 51 meningioma patient samples. Importantly, attention map visualization revealed that the algorithm primarily focuses on tumor regions deemed significant by neuropathologists, offering insights into the decision-making process of the CNN. Our findings highlight the capacity of CNNs to effectively harness phenotypic information from histological sections through computerized images for precision medicine. Notably, this study is the first demonstration of predicting clinically relevant DNA methylome information using computer vision applied to standard histopathology. The introduced AI framework holds great potential in supporting, augmenting, and expediting meningioma classification in the future.

Pathologists' first opinions on barriers and facilitators of computational pathology adoption in oncological pathology: an international study

Computational pathology (CPath) algorithms detect, segment or classify cancer in whole slide images, approaching or even exceeding the accuracy of pathologists. Challenges have to be overcome before these algorithms can be used in practice. We therefore aim to explore international perspectives on the future role of CPath in oncological pathology by focusing on opinions and first experiences regarding barriers and facilitators. We conducted an international explorative eSurvey and semi-structured interviews with pathologists utilizing an implementation framework to classify potential influencing factors. The eSurvey results showed remarkable variation in opinions regarding attitude, understandability and validation of CPath. Interview results showed that barriers focused on the quality of available evidence, while most facilitators concerned strengths of CPath. A lack of consensus was present for multiple factors, such as the determination of sufficient validation using CPath, the preferred function of CPath within the digital workflow and the timing of CPath introduction in pathology education. The diversity in opinions illustrates variety in influencing factors in CPath adoption. A next step would be to quantitatively determine important factors for adoption and initiate validation studies. Both should include clear case descriptions and be conducted among a more homogenous panel of pathologists based on sub specialization.

Unleashing the potential of AI for pathology: challenges and recommendations

Computational pathology is currently witnessing a surge in the development of AI techniques, offering promise for achieving breakthroughs and significantly impacting the practices of pathology and oncology. These AI methods bring with them the potential to revolutionize diagnostic pipelines as well as treatment planning and overall patient care. Numerous peer-reviewed studies reporting remarkable performance across diverse tasks serve as a testimony to the potential of AI in the field. However, widespread adoption of these methods in clinical and pre-clinical settings still remains a challenge. In this review article, we present a detailed analysis of the major obstacles encountered during the development of effective models and their deployment in practice. We aim to provide readers with an overview of the latest developments, assist them with insights into identifying some specific challenges that may require resolution, and suggest recommendations and potential future research directions. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Perception of Pathologists in Poland of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Medical Diagnosis-A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

In the past vicennium, several artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models have been developed to assist in medical diagnosis, decision making, and design of treatment protocols. The number of active pathologists in Poland is low, prolonging tumor patients' diagnosis and treatment journey. Hence, applying AI and ML may aid in this process. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the knowledge of using AI and ML methods in the clinical field in pathologists in Poland. To our knowledge, no similar study has been conducted.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting pathologists in Poland from June to July 2022. The questionnaire included self-reported information on AI or ML knowledge, experience, specialization, personal thoughts, and level of agreement with different aspects of AI and ML in medical diagnosis. Data were analyzed using IBM^® SPSS^® Statistics v.26, PQStat Software v.1.8.2.238, and RStudio Build 351.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 pathologists in Poland participated in our study. Their average age and years of experience were 38.92 ± 8.88 and 12.78 ± 9.48 years, respectively. Approximately 42% used AI or ML methods, which showed a significant difference in the knowledge gap between those who never used it (OR = 17.9, 95% CI = 3.57-89.79, p < 0.001). Additionally, users of AI had higher odds of reporting satisfaction with the speed of AI in the medical diagnosis process (OR = 4.66, 95% CI = 1.05-20.78, p = 0.043). Finally, significant differences (p = 0.003) were observed in determining the liability for legal issues used by AI and ML methods.

CONCLUSION

Most pathologists in this study did not use AI or ML models, highlighting the importance of increasing awareness and educational programs regarding applying AI and ML in medical diagnosis.

CONFIDENT-trial protocol: a pragmatic template for clinical implementation of artificial intelligence assistance in pathology

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been on the rise in the field of pathology. Despite promising results in retrospective studies, and several CE-IVD certified algorithms on the market, prospective clinical implementation studies of AI have yet to be performed, to the best of our knowledge. In this trial, we will explore the benefits of an AI-assisted pathology workflow, while maintaining diagnostic safety standards.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence compliant single-centre, controlled clinical trial, in a fully digital academic pathology laboratory. We will prospectively include prostate cancer patients who undergo prostate needle biopsies (CONFIDENT-P) and breast cancer patients who undergo a sentinel node procedure (CONFIDENT-B) in the University Medical Centre Utrecht. For both the CONFIDENT-B and CONFIDENT-P trials, the specific pathology specimens will be pseudo-randomised to be assessed by a pathologist with or without AI assistance in a pragmatic (bi-)weekly sequential design. In the intervention group, pathologists will assess whole slide images (WSI) of the standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections assisted by the output of the algorithm. In the control group, pathologists will assess H&E WSI according to the current clinical workflow. If no tumour cells are identified or when the pathologist is in doubt, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining will be performed. At least 80 patients in the CONFIDENT-P and 180 patients in the CONFIDENT-B trial will need to be enrolled to detect superiority, allocated as 1:1. Primary endpoint for both trials is the number of saved resources of IHC staining procedures for detecting tumour cells, since this will clarify tangible cost savings that will support the business case for AI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ethics committee (MREC NedMec) waived the need of official ethical approval, since participants are not subjected to procedures nor are they required to follow rules. Results of both trials (CONFIDENT-B and CONFIDENT-P) will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.

Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology

Machine learning (ML) models are poised to transform surgical pathology practice. The most successful use attention mechanisms to examine whole slides, identify which areas of tissue are diagnostic, and use them to guide diagnosis. Tissue contaminants, such as floaters, represent unexpected tissue. While human pathologists are extensively trained to consider and detect tissue contaminants, we examined their impact on ML models. We trained 4 whole slide models. Three operate in placenta for 1) detection of decidual arteriopathy (DA), 2) estimation of gestational age (GA), and 3) classification of macroscopic placental lesions. We also developed a model to detect prostate cancer in needle biopsies. We designed experiments wherein patches of contaminant tissue are randomly sampled from known slides and digitally added to patient slides and measured model performance. We measured the proportion of attention given to contaminants and examined the impact of contaminants in T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE) feature space. Every model showed performance degradation in response to one or more tissue contaminants. DA detection balanced accuracy decreased from 0.74 to 0.69 +/- 0.01 with addition of 1 patch of prostate tissue for every 100 patches of placenta (1% contaminant). Bladder, added at 10% contaminant raised the mean absolute error in estimating gestation age from 1.626 weeks to 2.371 +/ 0.003 weeks. Blood, incorporated into placental sections, induced false negative diagnoses of intervillous thrombi. Addition of bladder to prostate cancer needle biopsies induced false positives, a selection of high-attention patches, representing 0.033mm2, resulted in a 97% false positive rate when added to needle biopsies. Contaminant patches received attention at or above the rate of the average patch of patient tissue. Tissue contaminants induce errors in modern ML models. The high level of attention given to contaminants indicates a failure to encode biological phenomena. Practitioners should move to quantify and ameliorate this problem.

Computational pathology in 2030: a Delphi study forecasting the role of AI in pathology within the next decade

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly fuelling a fundamental transformation in the practice of pathology. However, clinical integration remains challenging, with no AI algorithms to date in routine adoption within typical anatomic pathology (AP) laboratories. This survey gathered current expert perspectives and expectations regarding the role of AI in AP from those with first-hand computational pathology and AI experience.

METHODS

Perspectives were solicited using the Delphi method from 24 subject matter experts between December 2020 and February 2021 regarding the anticipated role of AI in pathology by the year 2030. The study consisted of three consecutive rounds: 1) an open-ended, free response questionnaire generating a list of survey items; 2) a Likert-scale survey scored by experts and analysed for consensus; and 3) a repeat survey of items not reaching consensus to obtain further expert consensus.

FINDINGS

Consensus opinions were reached on 141 of 180 survey items (78.3%). Experts agreed that AI would be routinely and impactfully used within AP laboratory and pathologist clinical workflows by 2030. High consensus was reached on 100 items across nine categories encompassing the impact of AI on (1) pathology key performance indicators (KPIs) and (2) the pathology workforce and specific tasks performed by (3) pathologists and (4) AP lab technicians, as well as (5) specific AI applications and their likelihood of routine use by 2030, (6) AI's role in integrated diagnostics, (7) pathology tasks likely to be fully automated using AI, and (8) regulatory/legal and (9) ethical aspects of AI integration in pathology.

INTERPRETATION

This systematic consensus study details the expected short-to-mid-term impact of AI on pathology practice. These findings provide timely and relevant information regarding future care delivery in pathology and raise key practical, ethical, and legal challenges that must be addressed prior to AI's successful clinical implementation.

FUNDING

No specific funding was provided for this study.

Natural Language Processing in Pathology: Current Trends and Future Insights

Natural language processing (NLP) plays a key role in advancing health care, being key to extracting structured information from electronic health reports. In the last decade, several advances in the field of pathology have been derived from the application of NLP to pathology reports. Herein, a comprehensive review of the most used NLP methods for extracting, coding, and organizing information from pathology reports is presented, including how the development of tools is used to improve workflow. In addition, this article discusses, from a practical point of view, the steps necessary to extract data and encode natural language information for its analytical processing, ranging from preprocessing of text to its inclusion in complex algorithms. Finally, the potential of NLP-based automatic solutions for improving workflow in pathology and their further applications in the near future is highlighted.

Automatische Bildanalyse und künstliche Intelligenz in der Nephropathologie

Hintergrund

Fragestellung

Material und Methoden

Ergebnisse

Diskussion

Pilot study to evaluate tools to collect pathologist annotations for validating machine learning algorithms

Purpose: Validation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in digital pathology with a reference standard is necessary before widespread clinical use, but few examples focus on creating a reference standard based on pathologist annotations. This work assesses the results of a pilot study that collects density estimates of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer biopsy specimens. This work will inform the creation of a validation dataset for the evaluation of AI algorithms fit for a regulatory purpose. Approach: Collaborators and crowdsourced pathologists contributed glass slides, digital images, and annotations. Here, "annotations" refer to any marks, segmentations, measurements, or labels a pathologist adds to a report, image, region of interest (ROI), or biological feature. Pathologists estimated sTILs density in 640 ROIs from hematoxylin and eosin stained slides of 64 patients via two modalities: an optical light microscope and two digital image viewing platforms. Results: The pilot study generated 7373 sTILs density estimates from 29 pathologists. Analysis of annotations found the variability of density estimates per ROI increases with the mean; the root mean square differences were 4.46, 14.25, and 26.25 as the mean density ranged from 0% to 10%, 11% to 40%, and 41% to 100%, respectively. The pilot study informs three areas of improvement for future work: technical workflows, annotation platforms, and agreement analysis methods. Upgrades to the workflows and platforms will improve operability and increase annotation speed and consistency. Conclusions: Exploratory data analysis demonstrates the need to develop new statistical approaches for agreement. The pilot study dataset and analysis methods are publicly available to allow community feedback. The development and results of the validation dataset will be publicly available to serve as an instructive tool that can be replicated by developers and researchers.

General Roadmap and Core Steps for the Development of AI Tools in Digital Pathology

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the tissue diagnostic workflow will benefit the pathologist and, ultimately, the patient. The generation of such AI tools has two parallel yet interconnected processes, namely the definition of the pathologist’s task to be delivered in silico, and the software development requirements. In this review paper, we demystify this process, from a viewpoint that joins experienced pathologists and data scientists, by proposing a general pathway and describing the core steps to build an AI digital pathology tool. In doing so, we highlight the importance of the collaboration between AI scientists and pathologists, from the initial formulation of the hypothesis to the final, ready-to-use product.

Can artificial intelligence improve cancer treatments?

Artificial intelligence (AI) powered by the accumulating clinical and molecular data about cancer has fueled the expectation that a transformation in cancer treatments towards significant improvement of patient outcomes is at hand. However, such transformation has been so far elusive. The opacity of AI algorithms and the lack of quality annotated data being available at population scale are among the challenges to the application of AI in oncology. Fundamentally however, the heterogeneity of cancer and its evolutionary dynamics make every tumor response to therapy sufficiently different from the population, machine-learned statistical models, challenging hence the capacity of these models to yield reliable inferences about treatment recommendations that can improve patient outcomes. This article reviews the nominal elements of clinical decision-making for precision oncology and frames the utility of AI to cancer treatment improvements in light of cancer unique challenges.

Stratification by Tumor Grade Groups in a Holistic Evaluation of Machine Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation

Accurate and consistent segmentation plays an important role in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of both High Grade Glioma (HGG), including Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), and Low Grade Glioma (LGG). Accuracy of segmentation can be affected by the imaging presentation of glioma, which greatly varies between the two tumor grade groups. In recent years, researchers have used Machine Learning (ML) to segment tumor rapidly and consistently, as compared to manual segmentation. However, existing ML validation relies heavily on computing summary statistics and rarely tests the generalizability of an algorithm on clinically heterogeneous data. In this work, our goal is to investigate how to holistically evaluate the performance of ML algorithms on a brain tumor segmentation task. We address the need for rigorous evaluation of ML algorithms and present four axes of model evaluation-diagnostic performance, model confidence, robustness, and data quality. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of a glioma segmentation ML algorithm by stratifying data by specific tumor grade groups (GBM and LGG) and evaluate these algorithms on each of the four axes. The main takeaways of our work are-(1) ML algorithms need to be evaluated on out-of-distribution data to assess generalizability, reflective of tumor heterogeneity. (2) Segmentation metrics alone are limited to evaluate the errors made by ML algorithms and their describe their consequences. (3) Adoption of tools in other domains such as robustness (adversarial attacks) and model uncertainty (prediction intervals) lead to a more comprehensive performance evaluation. Such a holistic evaluation framework could shed light on an algorithm's clinical utility and help it evolve into a more clinically valuable tool.