Poor Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells—Definitions, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Outcome of Autologous Transplantation

How to manage poor mobilisers

Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (ASCT) has been used for more than five decades to treat malignant and non-malignant diseases. Successful engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy relies on the ability to collect sufficient CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), typically from peripheral blood after mobilization. Commonly, either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone as a single agent (i.e. steady-state mobilization) or G-CSF after chemotherapy is administered to collect adequate numbers of HPCs (minimum ≥2 × 106 CD34 + cells/kg for one ASCT; optimal up to 5 × 106 CD34 + cells/kg). However, a significant proportion of patients fail successful HPC mobilization, which is commonly defined as a CD34+ cell count below 10-15/µL after at least 4 days of 10 µg/kg b.w. G-CSF alone, or after chemo-mobilization in combination with 5-10 µg/kg b.w. G-CSF. In these situations plerixafor, a chemokine receptor inhibitor (CXCR4) can be used to enhance HPC collection in patients with multiple myeloma and malignant lymphoma whose cells mobilize poorly. Risk factors for poor mobilization have been evaluated and several strategies (e.g. plerixafor to rescue the mobilization approach or pre-emptive use) have been suggested to optimize mobilization, especially in patients at risk. This manuscript discusses the risk factors of poor CD34+ mobilization and summarizes the current strategies to optimize mobilization and HPC collection.

Optimizing autologous stem cell collections for patients with multiple myeloma receiving G-CSF and Plerixafor: A single center project

BACKGROUND

Increasing indications for cellular therapy collections have stressed our healthcare system, with autologous collections having a longer than desired wait time until apheresis collection. This quality improvement initiative was undertaken to accommodate more patients within existing resources.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection from October 2022 to April 2023 were included. Demographic, mobilization, laboratory, and apheresis data were retrospectively collected from the medical record.

RESULTS

This cohort included 120 patients (49.2% male), with a median age of 60 years. All received G-CSF and 95% received pre-emptive Plerixafor approximately 18 hours pre-collection. Most (79%) had collection goals of at least 8 × 106/kg CD34 cells, with 63% over 70 years old having this high collection goal (despite 20 years of institutional data showing <1% over 70 years old have a second transplant). With collection efficiencies of 55.9%, 44% of patients achieved their collection goal in a single day apheresis collection. A platelet count <150 × 103/μL on the day of collection was a predictor for poor mobilization; among 27 patients with a low baseline platelet count, 17 did not achieve the collection goal and 2 failed to collect a transplantable dose.

CONCLUSIONS

With minor collection goal adjustments, 15% of all collection appointments could have been avoided over this 6-month period. Other strategies to accommodate more patients include mobilization modifications (Plerixafor timing or substituting a longer acting drug), utilizing platelet counts to predict mobilization, and modifying apheresis collection volumes or schedule templates.

Poor Mobilization-Associated Factors in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Harvest

Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is an important therapeutic measure for both hematologic and non-hematologic diseases. For PBSCT to be successful, sufficient CD34+ cells need to be mobilized and harvested. Although risk factors associated with poor mobilization in patients with hematologic diseases have been reported, studies of patients with non-hematologic diseases and those receiving plerixafor are rare. To identify factors associated with poor mobilization, data from autologous PBSC harvest (PBSCH) in 491 patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. A multivariate analysis revealed that in patients with a hematologic disease, an age older than 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.655, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.049-2.611, p = 0.008), the use of myelotoxic agents (OR 4.384, 95% CI 2.681-7.168, p < 0.001), and a low platelet count (OR 2.106, 95% CI 1.205-3.682, p = 0.009) were associated with poor mobilization. In patients with non-hematologic diseases, a history of radiation on the pelvis/spine was the sole associated factor (OR 12.200, 95% CI 1.934-76.956, p = 0.008). Among the group of patients who received plerixafor, poor mobilization was observed in 19 patients (19/134, 14.2%) and a difference in the mobilization regimen was noted among the good mobilization group. These results show that the risk factors for poor mobilization in patients with non-hematologic diseases and those receiving plerixafor differ from those in patients with hematologic diseases; as such, non-hematologic patients require special consideration to enable successful PBSCH.

Comparison of two autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies in patients with multiple myeloma: CE plus G-CSF versus G-CSF only: A single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an essential therapeutic keystone. As for the stem cell mobilization procedure, different regimens have been established, usually consisting of a cycle of chemotherapy followed by application of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), although febrile neutropenia is a common complication. Following national guidelines, our institution decided to primarily use G-CSF only mobilization during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimize the patients' risk of infection and to reduce the burden on the health system.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-center analysis, the efficacy and safety of G-CSF only mobilization was evaluated and compared to a historic control cohort undergoing chemotherapy-based mobilization by cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CE) plus G-CSF.

RESULTS

Although G-CSF only was associated with a higher need for plerixafor administration (p < .0001) and a higher number of apheresis sessions per patient (p = .0002), we were able to collect the target dose of hematopoietic stem cells in the majority of our patients. CE mobilization achieved higher hematopoietic stem cell yields (p = .0015) and shorter apheresis sessions (p < .0001) yet was accompanied by an increased risk of febrile neutropenia (p < .0001). There was no difference in engraftment after ASCT.

DISCUSSION

G-CSF only mobilization is a useful option in selected patients with comorbidities and an increased risk of serious infections, especially in the wintertime or in future pandemics.

Insight into the mechanism of CD34+ cell mobilisation impairment in multiple myeloma patients treated with anti-CD38 therapy

Induction therapy followed by CD34+ cell mobilisation and autologous transplantation represents standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM). However, the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab have been associated with mobilisation impairment, yet the mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of three different regimens (dara-VCd, isa-KRd and VTd) on CD34+ cells using flow cytometry and transcriptomics. Decreased CD34+ cell peak concentration and yields, longer collection and delayed engraftment were reproduced after dara-VCd/isa-KRd versus VTd induction in 34 patients in total. Using flow cytometry, we detected major changes in the proportion of apheresis product and bone marrow CD34+ subsets in patients treated with regimens containing anti-CD38 therapy; however, without any decrease in CD38high B-lymphoid progenitors in both materials. RNA-seq of mobilised CD34+ cells from 21 patients showed that adhesion genes are overexpressed in CD34+ cells after dara-VCd/isa-KRd and JCAD, NRP2, MDK, ITGA3 and CLEC3B were identified as potential target genes. Finally, direct in vitro effect of isatuximab in upregulating JCAD and CLEC3B was confirmed by quantitative PCR. These findings suggest that upregulated adhesion-related interactions, rather than killing of CD34+ cells by effector mechanisms, could be leading causes of decreased mobilisation efficacy in MM patients treated with anti-CD38 therapy.

Impact of plerixafor use in the mobilization of blood grafts for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

Plerixafor (PLER), a reversible antagonist of the CXC chemokine receptor type 4, has been in clinical use for mobilization of blood grafts for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for about 15 years. Initially PLER was investigated in placebo-controlled trials with the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) filgrastim. It has also been used in combination with chemotherapy plus G-CSF in patients who had failed a previous mobilization attempt or appeared to mobilize poorly with current mobilization (preemptive use). This review summarizes what is known regarding addition of PLER to standard mobilization regimens. PLER increases mobilization of CD34+ cells, decreases the number of apheresis sessions needed to achieve collection targets and increases the proportion of patients who can proceed to AHCT. It appears also to increase the amount of various lymphocyte subsets in the grafts collected. In general, hematologic recovery after AHCT has been comparable to patients mobilized without PLER, although slower platelet recovery has been observed in some studies of patients who mobilize poorly. In phase III studies, long-term outcome has been comparable to patients mobilized without PLER. This also appears to be the case in patients receiving plerixafor for poor or suboptimal mobilization of CD34+ cells. In practice, PLER is safe and has not been shown to increase tumor cell mobilization.

Stem Cells Collection and Mobilization in Adult Autologous/Allogeneic Transplantation: Critical Points and Future Challenges

Achieving successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) relies on two fundamental pillars: effective mobilization and efficient collection through apheresis to attain the optimal graft dose. These cornerstones pave the way for enhanced patient outcomes. The primary challenges encountered by the clinical unit and collection facility within a transplant program encompass augmenting mobilization efficiency to optimize the harvest of target cell populations, implementing robust monitoring and predictive strategies for mobilization, streamlining the apheresis procedure to minimize collection duration while ensuring adequate yield, prioritizing patient comfort by reducing the overall collection time, guaranteeing the quality and purity of stem cell products to optimize graft function and transplant success, and facilitating seamless coordination between diverse entities involved in the HSCT process. In this review, we aim to address key questions and provide insights into the critical aspects of mobilizing and collecting hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation purposes.

Purging myeloma cell contaminants and simultaneous expansion of peripheral blood-mobilized stem cells

Human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are widely used as a cellular source for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the clinical treatment of hematological malignancies. After transplantation therapy, delays in hematopoietic recovery due to insufficient donor-derived HSCs can lead to increased risks of life-threatening infections and bleeding. Our previous studies developed an efficient ex vivo expansion culture medium (3a medium) for umbilical cord blood-derived HSCs (CBSCs), offering a potential solution to this problem. Nevertheless, the broader applicability of our culture method to alternative cell sources and, of greater significance, its efficacy in eliminating potentially disease-associated contaminated tumor cells, especially in autologous transplantation, raise critical clinical questions. In this study, we modified the 3a medium by incorporating UM729 to replace UM171, adding FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3) ligand, and adjusting the concentrations of butyzamide, 740Y-P, polyvinyl caprolactam-polyvinyl acetate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer (PCL-PVAc-PEG, Soluplus) to create the modified-3a medium. This sophistication allowed the efficient expansion of not only CBSCs but also peripheral blood-mobilized HSCs (PBSCs). Additionally, we successfully removed contaminated myeloma cells by adding bortezomib and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) at appropriate concentrations, although we maintained HSCs through the addition of lenalidomide. Our research findings present the potential for widespread clinical application of the modified-3a medium and suggest a safe ex vivo culture technique for expanding human HSCs within peripheral blood-derived donor grafts used for autologous HSCT.

Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts of the Leukapheresis Product Determined Using Sysmex XN Analyzers Predict a Sufficient Number of CD34+ Stem Cells in a Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvest for Autologous Transplantation

Objective Several institutions outsource CD34+ cell counting of leukapheresis products, limiting rapid measurements, as results are obtained the next day. This problem is compounded with plerixafor use, a stem cell-mobilizing drug that increases leukapheresis efficiency but requires administration the day before leukapheresis. Use of this drug for a second leukapheresis procedure before the first-day leukapheresis CD34+ count results are confirmed causes unnecessary leukapheresis and expensive plerixafor administration. We investigated whether or not measuring hematopoietic progenitor cells in leukapheresis products (AP-HPCs) using a Sysmex XN-series analyzer could resolve this problem. Methods We retrospectively compared the absolute AP-HPC value per body weight with the CD34+ (AP-CD34+) count in 96 first-day leukapheresis product samples obtained between September 2013 and January 2021. Comparisons were also conducted according to regimen: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) monotherapy, chemotherapy plus G-CSF, or plerixafor mobilization. Results AP-CD34+ and AP-HPC counts correlated strongly (rs=0.846) overall and, in particular, under chemotherapy plus G-CSF (rs=0.92) but correlated mildly under G-CSF monotherapy (rs=0.655). AP-HPCs could not completely be dichotomized based on an AP-CD34+ threshold of 2×106/kg for any stimulation procedure. In most cases with AP-HPCs >6×106/kg, the AP-CD34+ count exceeded 2.0×106/kg, but in 5.7% of these cases, the AP-CD34+ count was <2.0×106/kg. A cut-off of AP-HPCs >4.843×106/kg yielded a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 96% for predicting AP-CD34+≥2×106/kg. Conclusion AP-HPCs can identify cases in which sufficient stem cells have been collected.

Synergistic Effect of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor in the Mobilization of HSPCs Improves Overall Survival After PBSCT in a Preclinical Murine Model. Are We Far Enough for Therapy?

Strategies to improve hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization from the bone marrow can have a pivotal role in addressing iatrogenic bone-marrow insufficiency from chemo(radio)therapy and overcoming peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) limitations such as insufficient mobilization. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) represents the standard mobilization strategy for HSPC and has done so for more than three decades since its FDA approval. Its association with non-G-CSF agents is often employed for difficult HSPC mobilization. However, obtaining a synergistic effect between the two classes is limited by different timing and mechanisms of action. Based on our previous in vitro results, we tested the mobilization potential of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), alone and in combination with G-CSF in vivo in a murine study. Our results show an improved mobilization capability of the combination, which seems to act synergistically in stimulating hematopoiesis. With the current understanding of the dynamics of HSPCs and their origins in more primitive cells related to the germline, new strategies to employ the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors using chorionic gonadotropins could soon become clinical practice.

Gata2 noncoding genetic variation as a determinant of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization efficiency

Germline genetic variants alter the coding and enhancer sequences of GATA2, which encodes a master regulator of hematopoiesis. The conserved murine Gata2 enhancer (+9.5) promotes hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) genesis during embryogenesis. Heterozygosity for a single-nucleotide Ets motif variant in the human enhancer creates a bone marrow failure and acute myeloid leukemia predisposition termed GATA2 deficiency syndrome. The homozygous murine variant attenuates chemotherapy- and transplantation-induced hematopoietic regeneration, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) response to inflammation, and HSPC mobilization with the therapeutic mobilizer granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Because a Gata2 +9.5 variant attenuated G-CSF-induced HSPC expansion and mobilization, and HSC transplantation therapies require efficacious mobilization, we tested whether variation affects mechanistically distinct mobilizers or only those operating through select pathways. In addition to affecting G-CSF activity, Gata2 variation compromised IL-8/CXCR2- and VLA-4/VCAM1-induced mobilization. Although the variation did not disrupt HSPC mobilization mediated by plerixafor, which functions through CXCR4/CXCL12, homozygous and heterozygous variation attenuated mobilization efficacy of the clinically used plerixafor/G-CSF combination. The influence of noncoding variation on HSPC mobilization efficacy and function is important clinically because comprehensive noncoding variation is not commonly analyzed in patients. Furthermore, our mobilization-defective system offers unique utility for elucidating fundamental HSPC mechanisms.

The effect of mobilizing large numbers of CD34 + cells (super-mobilizers) on the engraftment and survival in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

With the use of plerixafor in addition to growth factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization, the yield of autologous stem cell harvest has been higher while the length of apheresis days has become shorter. There is still debate whether higher cell collection efficacy in autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) affect outcomes. In this retrospective study, we defined two groups of patients, group 1, super-mobilizers, with more than double the target cell dose collected (n = 15), while group 2 included all other patients (n = 75). Multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients were combined. Patients with chemo-mobilization, those needed more than one day apheresis, or with less than 100 days after ASCT were excluded. Correlations were performed between cell collection efficacy and post thaw CD34 cell viability (by 7AAD flow cytometry method), product HCT, and engraftment of neutrophils and platelets. We performed multiple linear regression using the above variables in addition to age, sex and disease type. We used Kaplan Meier's curves to show effect of cell collection efficacy on 1-year overall survival (OS). Our results show that all super-mobilizers received plerixafor in addition to G-CSF, while 83% did in group 2. Correlations between cell collection efficacy and neutrophil and platelet engraftment in group 1 and 2 was modest and better in group 1 (R=0.449 Vs 0.233 for neutrophils; R=0.464 Vs 0.110 for platelets, respectively). However, multiple linear regression showed statistically significant association between cell collection, as a continuous variable, with disease type (P < 0.001), product HCT (P < 0.001), post thaw viability (P = 0.003), and age (P = 0.013). MM patients were more likely to be super-mobilizers, while the product HCT was higher in the super-mobilizers. No significant effect of cell collection efficacy was found on engraftment of neutrophils or platelets. With relatively short post ASCT follow up, 6 patients in group 2 died of any cause while no deaths were recorded in the super-mobilizers group (P = 0.1892 by log-rank test). In conclusion, stem cell collection efficacy in ASCT is more frequent in MM than lymphoma patients, but is not predictive of faster engraftment. On the other hand, 1-year OS was 100% in the super-mobilizers group versus 93% in the other group.

Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials

BACKGROUND

While quadruplet induction therapies deepen responses in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, their impact on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection remains incompletely understood. This analysis aims to evaluate the effects of prolonged lenalidomide induction and isatuximab- or elotuzumab-containing quadruplet induction therapies on PBSC mobilization and collection.

METHODS

A total of 179 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM treated at a single academic center were included. The patients were evaluated based on PBSC mobilization and collection parameters, including overall collection results, CD34+ cell levels in peripheral blood, leukapheresis (LP) delays, overall number of LP sessions, and the rate of rescue mobilization with plerixafor. The patients underwent four different induction regimens: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd, six 21-day cycles, n = 44), isatuximab-RVd (six 21-day cycles, n = 35), RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 51), or elotuzumab-RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 49).

RESULTS

The patients' characteristics were well balanced across the different groups. Collection failures, defined as the inability to collect three sufficient PBSC transplants, were rare (n = 3, 2%), with no occurrences in the isatuximab-RVd and elotuzumab-RVd groups. Intensified induction with six 21-day cycles of RVd did not negatively impact the overall number of collected PBSCs (9.7 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.331) compared to four 21-day cycles of RVd. Plerixafor usage was more common after six cycles of RVd compared to four cycles (16% versus 8%). Addition of elotuzumab to RVd did not adversely affect overall PBSC collection (10.9 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.915). Patients treated with isatuximab-RVd (six cycles) had lower numbers of collected stem cells compared to those receiving RVd (six cycles) induction (8.8 × 106/kg bw versus 9.7 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.801), without experiencing significant delays in LP or increased numbers of LP sessions in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Plerixafor usage was more common after isatuximab plus RVd compared to RVd alone (34% versus 16%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that stem cell collection is feasible after prolonged induction with isatuximab-RVd without collection failures and might be further explored as induction therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Patients were treated within the randomized phase III clinical trials GMMG-HD6 (NCT02495922, 24/06/2015) and GMMG-HD7 (NCT03617731, 24/07/2018). However, during stem cell mobilization and -collection, no study-specific therapeutic intervention was performed.

Steady-state versus chemotherapy-based hematopoietic cell mobilization after anti-CD38-based induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

The incorporation of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in induction regimens of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been established as a new standard. However, the optimal strategy of stem cell mobilization in this context is not yet clear.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

From May 2020 till September 2022, we retrospectively reviewed patients receiving anti-CD38 mAb-based induction therapy followed by stem cell mobilization either in a steady-state protocol (SSM) using 10 μg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 5 days or in a chemotherapy-based protocol (CM) using 1-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.

RESULTS

Overall, 85 patients (median age 61 years) were included in the analysis. In total, 90 mobilization attempts were performed, 42 with SSM and 48 with CM. There was no significant difference in the median concentration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) prior to apheresis between SSM and CM (61/μL vs. 55.4/μL; p = .60). Cumulative CD34+ yields did not differ between the groups with median of 6.68 and 6.75 × 106 /kg body weight, respectively (p = .35). The target yield (≥4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight) was reached in 88% (CM) and 86% (SSM), with a high proportion even after a single apheresis session (76% vs. 75%). Plerixafor was found to be more frequently used in SSM (52%) than in CM (23%; p < .01). A total of 83 patients underwent autologous transplantation and all were engrafted.

CONCLUSIONS

Stem cell collection in patients undergoing anti-CD38-based induction therapy is feasible with either CM or SSM, although SSM more frequently requires plerixafor.

Impact of Clinical Parameters and Induction Regimens on Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Introduction

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ABSCT) remains the standard consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As a prerequisite, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) must be mobilized and collected by leukapheresis (LP). Many factors can hamper PBSC mobilization/collection. Here, we provide a comprehensive multiparametric assessment of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters in a large cohort.

Methods

In total, 790 MM patients (471 [60%] male, 319 [40%] female) who underwent PBSC mobilization/collection during first-line treatment were included. Evaluated PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters included the prolongation of PBSC mobilization, plerixafor administration, number of LP sessions, and overall PBSC collection goal/result.

Results

741 (94%) patients received cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/dexamethasone (CAD) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization. Plerixafor was administered in 80 (10%) patients. 489 (62%) patients started LP without delay. 530 (67%) patients reached the PBSC collection goal at the first LP session. The mean overall PBSC collection result was 10.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.4) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. In a multiparametric analysis, variables negatively associated with PBSC mobilization/collection outcomes were female gender, age >60 years, an advanced ISS stage, and local radiation pre-/during induction, but not remission status postinduction. Notably, the identified risk factors contributed differently to each PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameter. In this context, compared to all other induction regimens, lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies negatively affected only the number of LP sessions required to reach the collection goal, but no other PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters. In contrast, the probability of reaching a high collection goal of ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight was higher after lenalidomide-based induction compared to VCD/PAD or VAD - taking into account - that a higher G-SCF dosage was given in approximately one-third of patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies.

Conclusion

Considering the identified risk factors in the clinical setting can contribute to optimized PBSC mobilization/collection. Moreover, our study demonstrates the necessity for a differentiated evaluation of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters.

Mobilization and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection in Poor Mobilizing Patients with Lymphoma: Final Results of the German OPTIMOB Study

Introduction

Successful mobilization and collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are necessary for lymphoma patients eligible for myeloablative chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Albeit G-CSF alone or combined with chemotherapy is well-established methods for HSC mobilization, up to 40% of the patients fail to mobilize (poor mobilizer, PM). Plerixafor (PLX) is commonly used in PM patients resulting in increased migration of HSCs into peripheral blood and thus improves the collection outcome.

Methods

The prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-interventional OPTIMOB study assessed mobilization and collection parameter of patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma to get deep insights in the treatment of those patients in clinical routine focusing on PM patients. PM was defined as follows: (1) no achievement of ≥20 CD34+ progenitor cells/µL before first apheresis, (2) PLX administration at any time point during the observational period, (3) reduction of the initially planned CD34+ progenitor cell yield as necessity due to failed mobilization or HSC collection, and (4) no performance of apheresis due to low CD34+ progenitor level. Primary objective of the study was to assess mobilization success by the proportion of PM patients achieving >2 × 106 CD34+ progenitor cells/kg body weight on the first day of apheresis. Here, the data of the lymphoma cohort are presented.

Results

Out of 238 patients with lymphoma documented in the study, 32% were classified as PM. 87% of them received PLX. Demographic data revealed no obvious differences between PM and good mobilizing (GM) patients. All patients were treated highly individualized prior to mobilization. Majority of all PM patients were able to undergo apheresis (95%) and reached their individual requested CD34+ progenitor cell target (72%). 57% of the PM patients achieved >2.0 × 106 CD34+ progenitor cells/kg body weight on day 1 of apheresis and nearby 70% of them underwent ASCT. Median time to engraftment was similar in PM and GM patients of the lymphoma cohort.

Conclusions

Majority of PM patients with lymphoma were successfully mobilized and underwent ASCT. Most of them received PLX during the study.

Efficient manufacturing and engraftment of CCR5 gene-edited HSPCs following busulfan conditioning in nonhuman primates

Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy has been successfully used for a number of genetic diseases and is also being explored for HIV. However, toxicity of the conditioning regimens has been a major concern. Here we compared current conditioning approaches in a clinically relevant nonhuman primate model. We first customized various aspects of the therapeutic approach, including mobilization and cell collection protocols, conditioning regimens that support engraftment with minimal collateral damage, and cell manufacturing and infusing schema that reflect and build on current clinical approaches. Through a series of iterative in vivo experiments in two macaque species, we show that busulfan conditioning significantly spares lymphocytes and maintains a superior immune response to mucosal challenge with simian/human immunodeficiency virus, compared to total body irradiation and melphalan regimens. Comparative mobilization experiments demonstrate higher cell yield relative to our historical standard, primed bone marrow and engraftment of CRISPR-edited hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) after busulfan conditioning. Our findings establish a detailed workflow for preclinical HSPC gene therapy studies in the nonhuman primate model, which in turn will support testing of novel conditioning regimens and more advanced HSPC gene editing techniques tailored to any disease of interest.

Physical biomarkers for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Adhesion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to the bone marrow niche plays critical roles in the maintenance of the most primitive HSPCs. The interactions of HSPC-niche interactions are clinically relevant in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), because (i) leukemia-initiating cells adhered to the marrow niche are protected from the cytotoxic effect by chemotherapy and (ii) mobilization of HSPCs from healthy donors' bone marrow is crucial for the effective stem cell transplantation. However, although many clinical agents have been developed for the HSPC mobilization, the effects caused by the extrinsic molecular cues were traditionally evaluated based on phenomenological observations. This review highlights the recent interdisciplinary challenges of hematologists, biophysicists and cell biologists towards the design of defined in vitro niche models and the development of physical biomarkers for quantitative indexing of differential effects of clinical agents on human HSPCs.

Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: challenges, strategies, and current developments

Among hematological malignancies, multiple myeloma (MM) represents the leading indication of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Auto-HCT is predominantly performed with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), and the mobilization and collection of PBSCs are essential steps for auto-HCT. Despite the improved success of conventional methods with the incorporation of novel agents for PBSC mobilization in MM, mobilization failure is still a concern. The current review comprehensively summarizes various mobilization strategies for mobilizing PBSCs in MM patients and the evolution of these strategies over time. Moreover, existing evidence substantiates that the mobilization regimen used may be an important determinant of graft content. However, limited data are available on the effects of graft characteristics in patient outcomes other than hematopoietic engraftment. In this review, we discussed the effect of graft characteristics on clinical outcomes, mobilization failure, factors predictive of poor mobilization, and potential mobilization regimens for such patients.

Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) for Multiple Myeloma: While New Horizons Emerge, It Is Still Only a Silver Lining for Resource-Constrained Settings

Background Significant hurdles impede the optimal implementation of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Herein, we highlight the challenges faced in LMICs while performing HSCT and report the long-term outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent autologous HSCT (AHSCT) at our center. Besides, we provide a comprehensive review of studies reporting long-term outcomes of AHSCT in MM from the Indian subcontinent. Methodology This study was conducted at the State Cancer Institute, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India. Case records of all patients with MM who received AHSCT from December 2010 to July 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. A non-systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Data regarding clinicopathological parameters and long-term follow-up were extracted from relevant studies and for patients included in our study. Results At our center, 47 patients (median age 52.0 years) with MM underwent AHSCT. Majority of patients had stage III disease (ISS) and median time to transplant was 11.5 months. The five-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Studies from the Indian subcontinent have observed a five-year OS of ~50% to ~85%. However, a greater variability in the five-year PFS has been reported, ranging from ~20% to ~75%. The median time to transplant has ranged from seven to 17 months (indicating time delays) with median CD34 cell counts of 2.7-6.3×106 cells/kg (lower than developed countries). Conclusions Despite significant resource limitations in LMICs, AHSCT is increasingly been performed in MM with encouraging long-term outcomes.

Impact of the number of cryopreserved CD34+ cells in the infused blood grafts on hematologic recovery and survival in myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplantation: Experience from the GOA study

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on the impact of CD34⁺ cell loss during cryopreservation and the amount of cryopreserved CD34⁺ cells infused after high-dose therapy on hematologic recovery and post-transplant outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This post-hoc study aimed to investigate factors associating with CD34⁺ cell loss during cryopreservation and the effects of the infusion of a very low number (<1.0 × 10⁶ /kg, group A), low number (1-1.9 × 10⁶ /kg, group B), and optimal number (≥2 × 10⁶ /kg, group C) of thawed viable CD34⁺ cells on hematologic recovery, progression free survival, and overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation among 127 patients with MM.

RESULTS

In group C, pegfilgrastim use (P = 0.001), plerixafor use (P = 0.039), and older age ≥ 60 years (P = 0.026) were associated with less loss of CD34⁺ cells during cryopreservation. Better mobilization efficacy correlated with greater CD34⁺ cell loss in group B (P = 0.013 and P = 0.001) and in group C (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Early platelet engraftment was slowest in group A (20 d vs 12 d in group B vs 11 d in group C, P = 0.003). The infused viable CD34⁺ cell count <1.0 × 10⁶ /kg seemed not to have influence on PFS (P = 0.322) or OS (P = 0.378) in MM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryopreservation impacts significantly on the CD34⁺ cell loss. A very low number of graft viable CD34⁺ cells did not affect PFS or OS.

The effect of preemptive use of plerixafor on stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the preemptive use of plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma which was administered as a preemptive single dose to the patients who were determined to have a CD34+ cell count of

Poor Mobilizers in Lymphoma but Not Myeloma Patients Had Significantly Poorer Progression-Free Survival after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Large Retrospective, Single-Center Observational Study

In our single-center study, 357 myeloma and lymphoma patients between 2009 and 2019 were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF 7.5 µg/kg bid for four days) plus a fixed dose of 24 mg Plerixafor when indicated (Plerixafor Group, n = 187) or G-CSF alone (G-CSF Group, n = 170). The target CD34 cell yields were ≥2.0 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg in lymphoma and ≥4.0 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg in myeloma patients to enable putative second transplants in the latter. There were no significant differences in engraftment kinetics or transfusion requirements between the Plerixafor Group and the control group in the myeloma cohort, with lymphoma patients not requiring Plerixafor showing significantly faster neutrophil recovery, a trend to faster platelet recovery, and a significantly lower need for platelet transfusions, probably due to the significantly lower number of CD34-positive cells re-transfused. While in myeloma patients the outcome (overall survival, progression-free survival) following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was similar between the Plerixafor Group and the control group, hard to mobilize lymphoma patients had significantly poorer progression-free survival (47% vs. 74% at 36 months after ASCT, p = 0.003) with a trend also to poorer overall survival (71% vs. 84%). In conclusion, while there seem to be no differences in stemness capacity and long-term engraftment efficiency between the Plerixafor and the G-CSF Group in lymphoma as well as myeloma patients, poor mobilizing lymphoma patients per se constitute a high-risk population with a poorer outcome after ASCT. Whether disease characteristics and/or a more intense or stem cell-toxic pre-mobilization chemo-/radiotherapy burden in this cohort are responsible for this observation remains to be shown in future studies.

Day -1 CD34+ Cells and Platelet Count Predict the Number of Apheresis in Poor-Mobilizer Patients Rescued by Plerixafor

Plerixafor is widely used as up-front treatment with G-CSF to enhance peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell output in patients failing previous mobilizations. Less frequently, plerixafor is used to rescue an unsatisfactory mobilization following chemotherapy (CT) and G-CSF. This study investigates if pre-collection factors affect the CD34+ cell harvest in chemotherapy and G-CSF mobilizations rescued by plerixafor. Clinical and hematological data relative to patients, mobilization, and apheresis products were retrospectively examined. The outcome was completing a target cell dose ≥ 2 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg at first apheresis. The effect exerted on the outcome by patient- and disease-related factors was investigated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The analysis included data from 42 patients affected by hematological (39 patients) and non-hematological malignancies (three patients). Twenty-nine patients (69%) attained the target cell dose at first apheresis. Twelve out of the remaining 13 patients received an additional plerixafor administration, and all accomplished the transplant dose at a second apheresis procedure. Day -1 CD34+ PB count (OR1.46, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, p = 0.008) and platelet count (OR1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.0, p = 0.033) predicted the achievement of the target dose at first apheresis, independently of pre-mobilization CT, radiation therapy, and disease status at mobilization. At ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off value predicting the successful collection at first apheresis was 7.5/µL for Day -1 CD34+ cell count (AUC 0.830, 0.69 sensitivity, and 0.92 specificity) and 75 × 10⁹/L for Day -1 platelet count (AUC = 0.736, 0.65 sensitivity and 0.85 specificity). In conclusion, on-demand plerixafor rescue allows a successful stem cell collection, irrespectively of disease type and status, prior CT lines, and radiation exposure. Pre-apheresis CD34+ cells and platelet count predict the need for one or two aphereses.

A Comparison of Four Leukapheresis Methods to Harvest an Optimal Dose of CD34+ Cells: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (Px) as well as high volume (HV) leukapheresis have been shown to reduce hematopoietic stem progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization failure rates. However, no direct comparisons of such methods currently exists.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We compared the HSPC collection yield based on basal peripheral blood CD34+ cell numbers in patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation in a retrospective chart review. The leukapheresis methods used included HV vs. regular volume (RV) with or without Px. There were 116 patients in the study group while the historical control group had 34 patients.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Control group underwent RV leukapheresis without Px. Addition of Px or HV in the study group failed to display significant improvement in CD34+ cell collection yield; however, when basal CD34+ cell numbers were taken into account, both Px+RV and HV without Px increased CD34+ cell collection yield. The collection failure rates of HV without Px group were comparable to Px+RV when the basal CD34+ cell numbers were over 20/μL. Of interest, multivariate linear regression analysis did not detect any significant difference between HV vs Px+RV or other leukapheresis methods in CD34 yields or collection failure rates from a single collection after controlling for other factors (sex, age or underlying disease). In multivariate analysis, pre apheresis CD34+ cell number was significantly and positively associated with the CD34+ cell yields from a single apheresis. In our studies, the majority of patients can be rescued without Px by HV alone as a potential cost saving approach. In summary, trend in our studies reflects that both Px and HV are capable of reducing the mobilization failure rates except the poorest mobilizers which will need to be validated in larger studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Outcomes of poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilizers with multiple myeloma at the first mobilization: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an important therapeutic strategy for multiple myeloma; however, a proportion of patients fail to mobilize a sufficient number of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) to proceed to ASCT. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of poor mobilizers. Clinical data on poorly mobilized patients who underwent PBSC harvest for almost 10 years were retrospectively collected from 44 institutions in the Japanese Society of Myeloma (JSM). Poor mobilizers were defined as patients with less than 2 × 10⁶/kg of CD34⁺ cells harvested at the first mobilization. The proportion of poor mobilization was 15.1%. A sufficient dataset including overall survival (OS) was evaluable in 258 poor mobilizers. Overall, 92 out of 258 (35.7%) poor mobilizers did not subsequently undergo ASCT, mainly due to an insufficient number of PBSCs. Median OS from apheresis was longer for poor mobilizers who underwent ASCT than for those who did not (86.0 vs. 61.9 mon., p = 0.02). OS from the diagnosis of poor mobilizers who underwent ASCT in our cohort was similar to those who underwent ASCT in the JSM database (3y OS rate, 86.8% vs. 85.9%). In this cohort, one‐third of poor mobilizers who did not undergo ASCT had relatively poor survival. In contrast, the OS improved in poor mobilizers who underwent ASCT. However, the OS of extremely poor mobilizers was short irrespective of ASCT.

Analysis of stem cell collections in adult patients with Ewing sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Ewing sarcoma is one of the most frequent soft-tissue tumors in pediatric patients. The current treatment protocols recommend stem cell apheresis (SCA) after completion of the second course of induction therapy with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicine, and etoposide (VIDE). The feasibility of SCA and graft compositions in adult patients with Ewing sarcoma have not been previously analyzed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The authors analyzed 29 stem cell collections of 19 adult patients (9 male, 10 female) at a median age of 27 (range 19-53) years mobilized after VIDE (n = 17), cyclophosphamide/topotecan (n = 1) or vincristine, dactinomycin and ifosfamide (n = 1) chemotherapy. All patients were mobilized with filgrastim 5 μg/kg twice daily from day +7 of chemotherapy. The collections were performed if CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood was >10/μL. The target yields were ≥4×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg body weight.

RESULTS

Median CD34+ cells/μL in peripheral blood before SCA were 45.8 (range 6.7-614.4)/μL. The median cumulative yields were 10.6 (range 1.5-38.8) CD34+ cells/kg body weight and ≥2×10⁶ in all but two patients (89%). CD34, CD3, and CD56 yields in collections after the third VIDE and after later courses did not differ. Four patients underwent high-dose therapy with autologous transplantation, and all were engrafted.

DISCUSSION

Stem cell mobilization is feasible in most Ewing sarcoma patients. Additionally, the present study's data suggest that it is safe to postpone stem cell collection to a later VIDE chemotherapy cycle if medically indicated.

Predictors of Poor Haematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilisation In Patients With Haematological Malignancies at a South African Centre

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is an established consolidation strategy in the treatment of haematological malignancies, however poor mobilisation (PM) can contribute to patient morbidity and high resource utilisation. Identifying the incidence, risk factors for PM and engraftment outcomes are important goals in our resource limited setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with haematological malignancies that consecutively underwent ASCT at Groote Schuur hospital, Cape Town, South Africa from January 2013 to January 2019.

RESULTS

146 patients - majority with multiple myeloma (MM)(41,8%), F:M= 1:2, underwent leukapheresis with median age of 32 years (range, 9 - 66 years). PM occurred in 25/146 (17%), mobilisation failure (MF) in 3/146 (2%) and super mobilisation (SMs) in 99/146 (68%), respectively. Risk factors for PM were: diagnosis of acute leukaemia (RR = 25, 95% CI 3.4 - 183, p = 0.002) and Hodgkin lymphoma (RR = 19, 95% CI 2.6 - 142, p = 0.004); low white cell count (WCC) at harvest (WCC < 9 × 10⁹/L (RR=4.3, 95% CI 2.3 - 8.3, p < 0.0001) and two vs one line of prior therapy (RR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.45 - 6.7, p = 0.0037). Median days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 14 days (95% CI 14-15 days) and 16 days (95% CI 15-16 days) respectively.

CONCLUSION

PM occurred in 17% of a contemporary South African ASCT cohort, albeit with a low MF rate (2%). There was surprisingly high rate (68%) of SMs, possibly reflective of superfluous mobilisation strategy in MM patients. We identified predictive factors for PM that will lead to enhanced cost-effective use of plerixafor.

Impact of mobilization regimen on multiday collection of peripheral blood CD34+ cells by large volume leukapheresis

BACKGROUND

The collection yield of hematopoietic progenitors cell (HPC) by leukapheresis is critical for a successful transplantation, which often requires multiday collections to achieve the collection goal.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Collection procedures of 181 patients who underwent leukapheresis for more than 1 day were reviewed. Patients were separated into six groups based on the mobilization regimen: G-CSF on day 1 (D1) and day 2 (D2) (G-G); G-CSF on D1 and G-CSF and plerixafor on D2 (G-GP); G-CSF and plerixafor on day D1 and D2 (GP-GP); G-CSF and plerixafor on D1 and G-CSF on D2 (GP-G); chemotherapy and G-CSF on D1 and D2 (GC-GC); and chemotherapy, G-CSF, and plerixafor on D1 and D2 (GCP-GCP). Patient's pre-collection CD34 count (pre-CD34) on D1 and D2 were compared in the same individual and among groups.

RESULTS

We found D2 pre-CD34 were significantly decreased in G-G, GP-G, and GP-GP groups and significantly increased in G-GP group (p < .001) using a repeated measures ANOVA analysis. D2 pre-CD34 remained at similar levels as D1 in GC-GC and GCP-GCP groups. A multiple regression analysis showed that the mobilization regimen was the only factor that significantly affected pre-CD34 D2/D1 ratio (p < .001). There was a significant difference in the pre-CD34 D2/D1 ratio (p < .001) among these six groups with the lowest in GP-G group (0.40 ± 0.45), and the highest in G-GP group (2.35 ± 0.36).

DISCUSSION

Mobilization regimen has significant impact on pre-collection CD34 count. Apheresis facilities may change mobilizing drugs accordingly to achieve a specific HPC goal.

High Efficacy of Stem Cell Mobilization With Etoposide+Cytarabine Plus G-CSF in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Background

Efficient mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells plays a vital role in successful autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), especially in cases with high-risk cytogenetic recommended for tandem ASCT. However, the optimal mobilization strategy remains a matter of debate in the era of lenalidomide. The combination of etoposide with Cytarabine plus G-CSF as a novel mobilization regimen in MM has not been reported previously.

Methods

This research retrospectively studied mobilization efficacy and safety using etoposide combined with Cytarabine (etoposide 50–100 mg/m², qd d1–3; AraC 0.5 g/m², q12h d1~3) plus G-CSF (5 µg/kg/day, from d5 until the day of apheresis) in 128 patients with MM. 70(54.7%) patients received lenalidomide-based induction regimens treatment

Results

A median of 27.75×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg was collected in the first apheresis, and 28.23×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg were collected overall. Of the 128 patients, all achieved adequate collection (≥2×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg), 121(94.5%) achieved optimal collection for single ASCT (≥5×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg), and 114(89.1%) harvested optimal collection for tandem ASCT (≥10×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg). In particular, the target yield of optimal collection for tandem ASCT was reached in 82.8% (106/128) by a single apheresis procedure. 14 patients obtained deeper response post mobilization. In multivariate analysis, cycles of prior chemotherapy independently affected the optimal achievement of CD34+ cells (p=0.004, OR 0.695, 95% CI 0.544~0.888). Previous lenalidomide exposure did not significantly impair CD34+ cells collection. Although 68% episodes of antibiotic usage were observed, no severe infection or treatment-related mortality occurred.

Conclusion

Stem cell mobilization with Etoposide + Cytarabine plus G-CSF was highly efficient and safe in patients with MM, which could be considered in high-risk MM patients who were referred for tandem ASCT.

Plerixafor stem cell mobilization in Japanese children: A post-marketing study

BACKGROUND

Plerixafor is approved in Japan for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization prior to autologous transplant, but limited data are available on the use in children. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor in Japanese children aged <15 years.

METHODS

A multicenter, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in Japan to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor in routine clinical practice. This subgroup analysis examined the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor administered as a once-daily, subcutaneous injection in children aged <15 years. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of patients with 2 × 10⁶ cells CD34+ cells/kg collected via apheresis within 4 days.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with solid tumors were included in this analysis; (median age 6.0 years, range, 1-13 years). In addition to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, all patients had received chemotherapy immediately prior to plerixafor administration. The mean (SD) daily dose of plerixafor was 0.24 (0.01) mg/kg. Seven of the 18 patients (38.9%) developed adverse drug reactions (ADRs), all occurring in patients aged ≥6 years and weighing ≥16 kg. The most common ADRs were pyrexia (n = 4), vomiting (n = 3), nausea (n = 2), and abdominal pain (n = 2). Twelve patients (66.7%) achieved a CD34+ cell count ≥2 × 10⁶ cells/kg within 4 days after the start of plerixafor administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide an encouraging sign that plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg may be safe and effective in pediatric patients in routine clinical practice in Japan, but further research in larger studies is needed.

Prophylactic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Extensive Bone-Marrow Infiltration of Neuroendocrine Tumours Prior to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) can be successfully repeated but may eventually be dose-limited. Since ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE dose limitation may come from hematological rather than renal function, hematological peripheral blood stem cell backup might be desirable. Here, we report our initial experience of peripheral blood stem-cell collection (PBSC) in patients with treatment-related cytopenia and therefore high risk of bone-marrow failure. Five patients with diffuse bone-marrow infiltration of NET and relevant myelosuppression (≥grade 2) received PBSC before one PRRT cycle with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (7.6 ± 0.8 GBq/cycle). Standard stem-cell mobilization with Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was applied, and successful PBSC was defined as a collection of >2 × 10⁶/kg CD34+ cells. In case of initial failure, Plerixafor was administered in addition to G-CSF prior to apheresis. PBSC was successfully performed in all patients with no adverse events. Median cumulative activity was 44.8 GBq (range, 21.3-62.4). Three patients had been previously treated with PRRT, two of which needed the addition of Plerixafor for stem-cell mobilization. Only one of five patients required autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation during the median follow up time of 28 months. PBSC collection seems to be feasible in NET with bone-marrow involvement and might be worth considering as a backup strategy prior to PRRT, in order to overcome dose-limiting bone-marrow toxicity.

Prediction of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Patients with Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Objective:

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a significant and potentially curative treatment modality for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. Insufficient mobilization and harvest of peripheral stem cells can be a major obstacle for performing ASCT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that might influence mobilization failure in patients with lymphoma.

Materials and Methods:

Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent stem cell mobilization afterwards at the Hacettepe University Medical School Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, Turkey, between the years of 2000 and 2018 were evaluated.

Results:

A total of 87 patients were included in this study. In 66 of 87 patients (75.9%), the first mobilization trial was successful. Adequate (≥2x106/kg) CD34+ cells were collected in the first apheresis for 66 patients (9.5±8.1). For 21 of 87 (24.1%), the first mobilization trial was unsuccessful. Therefore, a second mobilization trial was performed for these patients with plerixafor (5.5±3.3). The number of CD34+ cells was significantly higher in patients who were successful in the first mobilization (p=0.002).

Conclusion:

The success rate of the first mobilization trial was found to be higher in patients with high platelet counts before mobilization and patients who received chemotherapy-based mobilization protocols. In the patients who had mobilization failure in the first trial, plerixafor was used in a later mobilization, and those patients had an adequate amount of stem cells for ASCT. Parameters predicting mobilization failure would allow for preemptive, more cost-effective use of such agents during the first mobilization attempt; however, risk factors for mobilization failure are still not clear.

Local Radiation Therapy Before and During Induction Delays Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients

In multiple myeloma, local radiation therapy (RT) of osseous lesions before peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization is assumed to impair the PBSC mobilization and collection. However, the results of previously published studies are inconsistent and do not evaluate detailed metrics of RT and PBSC outcome parameters. In total, 352 patients undergoing PBSC mobilizations and RT in first-line treatment were evaluated. Patients were grouped into RT (n = 283) and no RT (n = 69) before PBSC mobilization. Except for the International Staging System score, both groups were homogeneous regarding the first diagnosis characteristics, first-line treatments, and response parameters. RT metrics (RT yes versus no, volume of irradiated hematopoietic bone marrow [BM], biologically equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]) were analyzed for the following PBSC outcome parameters: achievement of the PBSC collection goal, CD34+ cell collection yield, duration of the mobilization phase, and number of leukapheresis (LP) sessions to reach the collection goal. No statistically significant differences in the percentage of collection failures to reach at least 3 sufficient PBSC transplants were identified comparing patients with (n = 32 [11%]) and without RT (n = 4 [6%]) before PBSC mobilization (P = .265). However, patients with RT before PBSC mobilization showed a significant prolongation of the PBSC mobilization (median 1 day, P =.026) and required a higher number of LP sessions to reach the collection goal (median 1 LP, P < .001) compared with patients who received RT after PBSC mobilization. Moreover, patients with RT before PBSC mobilization reached a significantly lower CD34+ cell collection result (mean 8.94 versus 9.81 × 10⁶/kg body weight [bw], P = .002). No correlation was identified between the overall CD34+ cell yield and the volume of irradiated hematopoietic BM or EQD2, respectively. In the RT before PBSC mobilization group, patients who required more than 1 LP session to reach the PBSC collection goal after RT had a significantly higher percentage of radiated hematopoietic BM compared to those who required only 1 LP session (mean 9.7% versus 7.2%, P = .002). Overall, our study indicates a negative impact of RT on PBSC mobilization and collection. Apart from emergency settings, it might be beneficial to postpone RT to a post-PBSC collection time point. © 2021 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Glucose oxidase induces mobilization of long-term repopulating hematopoietic cells in mice

Hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) mobilized to peripheral blood, rather than those remaining in the bone marrow (BM), are commonly used as stem cell source in the clinic. As reactive oxygen species (ROS) are suggested as mediator of HSPC mobilization, we examined the impacts of glucose oxidase (GO) on peripheral mobilization of BM HSPCs and the associated mechanisms. Intravenous injection of GO induced HSPC mobilization even by single treatment, and the GO‐mobilized cells maintained their long‐term reconstituting and differentiating potentials in conditioned recipients. GO‐injected mice lived a normal life without adverse effects such as stem cell senescence, hematopoietic disorders, and blood parameter alteration. The mobilization effect of GO was even evident in animal models showing poor mobilization, such as old, 5‐fluorouracil‐treated, or alendronate‐treated mice. Importantly, combined injection of GO with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) and/or AMD3100 enhanced more greatly HSPC mobilization than did G‐CSF, AMD3100, or both. The GO‐stimulated HSPC mobilization was almost completely attenuated by n‐acetyl‐L‐cysteine treatment. Collectively, our results not only highlight the potential role of GO in HSPC mobilization via ROS signaling, but also provide a GO‐based new strategy to improve HSPC mobilization in poorly mobilizing allogeneic or autologous donors via combination with G‐CSF and/or AMD3100.

Collection and Processing of Mobilized Mouse Peripheral Blood at Lowered Oxygen Tension Yields Enhanced Numbers of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Mobilized peripheral blood (mPB) hematopoietic stem (HSCs) and progenitor (HPCs) cells are primary sources for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Successful HCT requires threshold numbers of high-quality HSCs to reconstitute hematopoiesis long-term. Nevertheless, considerable percentages of patients and healthy donors fail to achieve required thresholds of HSCs with current mobilization regimens. In this present study we demonstrate that similar to mouse bone marrow (BM) and human cord blood, collection and processing of mouse Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)-, AMD3100/Plerixafor- or G-CSF plus AMD3100/Plerixafor-mobilized HSCs in 3% O₂ results in enhanced numbers of rigorously-defined phenotypic and for G-CSF - and G-CSF plus AMD3100/Plerixafor - mPB enhanced functionally-engrafting HSCs. These results may be of potential clinical utility. Graphical Abstract.

A concise review on factors influencing the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation main outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As a curative procedure, hematopoietic stemcell transplantation (HSCT) is an approved treatment for many malignant orbenign hematologic and non-hematologic diseases. There are different outcomes of HSCT, as well as several parameters influencing these outcomes.

METHODS

We had searched scientific sources like Web ofScience and PubMed with a combination of keywords such as HSCT, engraftment,survival, outcomes, etc. Totally, 80 articles were included.

RESULTS

Here we have reviewed the effective factors onmain outcomes of HSCT including engraftment, survival, graft versus hostdisease, and Mobilization. Also, the prediction of hematological reconstitutionand some novel suggestions leading to better outcomes are reviewed.

CONCLUSION

The study will be applicable for improvedmanagement of autologous and allogeneic HSCT process to increase the procedureefficiency.

Filgrastim alone versus cyclophosphamide and filgrastim for mobilization in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard treatment approach in most multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Before ASCT, chemomobilization or only granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization can be preferred in stem cell mobilization. The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect of the two mobilization regimens on hematopoietic engraftment times, CD34+cell counts and number of apheresis required to harvest stem cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of MM patients who applied to our hospital between 2010 and 2020 were analysed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups (Group A: Cyclophosphamide plus filgrastim, Group B: Filgrastim alone) according to the mobilization regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 223 MM patients were included in this study (Group A:153, Group B:70 patients). When the patients in Group A and Group B were compared, the number of collected CD34+ cells were higher in Group A (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, and number of apheresis required to harvest stem cells (p > 0.05). The rate of infection development during mobilization in the patients in group A and the duration of hospitalization of these patients were higher than the patients in group B (p < 0.001). Patients receiving >6 cycles of chemotherapy and immunomodulatory treatment had lower collected CD34+ cells than other patients (p = 0.012 and p = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, filgrastim alone seems to provide a sufficient amount of stem cells in MM patients.

Cost saving, patient centered algorithm for progenitor cell mobilization for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

Administration of plerixafor with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilizes CD34+ cells much more effectively than G-CSF alone, but cost generally limits plerixafor use to patients at high risk of insufficient CD34+ cell collection based on low peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ counts following 4 days of G-CSF. We analyzed costs associated with administering plerixafor to patients with higher day 4 CD34+ cell counts to decrease apheresis days and explored the use of a fixed split dose of plerixafor instead of weight-based dosing. We analyzed 235 patients with plasma cell disorders or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent progenitor cell mobilization and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) between March 2014 and December 2017. Two hundred ten (89%) received G-CSF plus Plerixafor and 25 (11%) received G-CSF alone. Overall, 180 patients (77%) collected in 1 day, 53 (22%) in 2 days and 2 (1%) in 3 days. Based on our data, we present a probabilistic algorithm to identify patients likely to require more than one day of collection using G-CSF alone. CD34+ cell yield, ANC and platelet recovery were not significantly different between fixed and standard dose plerixafor. Plerixafor enabled collection in 1 day and with estimated savings of $5000, compared to patients who did not receive plerixafor and required collection for three days. While collection and processing costs and patient populations vary among institutions, our results suggest re-evaluation of current algorithms.

[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of plerixafor combined with G-CSF in plasma cell disease mobilization]

目的

分析普乐沙福联合G-CSF在浆细胞疾病自体造血干细胞中动员的效果及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月在北京大学人民医院使用普乐沙福联合G-CSF进行自体造血干细胞动员的浆细胞疾病患者的基线临床资料、采集成功率及不良反应。

结果

共纳入49例浆细胞疾病患者，多发性骨髓瘤（MM）39例（79.6%），淀粉样变性8例（16.3%），肾脏意义的单克隆免疫球蛋白沉积病（MGRS）2例（4.1%），肾功能不全16例（32.7%）。其他动员方案既往采集失败患者7例（14.3%）。使用普乐沙福动员后，中位采集次数1（1～3）次，中位采集天数2（1～3）d，一次采集成功47例（95.9%），两次采集累积成功率为100%。在16例肾功能不全的患者中，5例（31.3%）患者第1天采集成功，8例（50%）需要第2天采集，3例（18.8%）需要第3天采集。主要不良反应依次为乏力、失眠、腹痛、腹泻、头晕、关节痛。共37例患者行auto-HSCT，白细胞中位植活时间11（8～13）d，血小板中位植活时间11（9～26）d。

结论

普乐沙福联合G-CSF用于浆细胞疾病患者自体造血干细胞动员成功率高，不良反应少，即使在肾功能不全的患者中也具有较高的动员成功率。

First experience of the use of a generic of plerixafor in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients

Mobilization failure in patients is a major therapeutic concern which makes subsequent ASCT impossible. A new growth factor called Plerixafor (Mozobil®) developed by the pharmaceutical industry (Sanofi-aventis, France), is a chemoreceptor antagonist, CXCR4 type, which disrupts the interaction of SDFI and CXCR4, thereby enhancing the effect of G-CSF mobilization and is especially indicated for mobilization failure. Currently, there is a generic of plerixafor developed by the pharmaceutical industry (Hetero Drugs Ltd, India). The brand name of this medicine is Mozifor®. The objective of this study was to evaluate if generic plerixafor has the same efficacy and safety as originator plerixafor when used with G-CSF in the mobilization of PBSCs for autologous ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma failure patients. The 32 patients received plerixafor were divided in two groups. The first group concerns the 11 consecutive patients prospectively received generic plerixafor (Mozifor®) in the period between January to July 2020. These were compared with a retrospective control cohort (second group n = 21) who had been treated between 2009 and 2019 with originator plerixafor (Mozobil®). For the Mozifor® group, the mean CD34+ was 4.54x10⁶/kg(1.56-6.79), the median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count >0.5 G/L was 13 days (range: 8-21). The median time to self-sustained platelet count >20 G/L was 15 days (range: 8-24). For the Mozobil® group, the mean CD34+ was 3.1x10⁶/kg (0.56-8.91) (p=0.86), the median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count >0.5 G/L was 10 days (range 7-23). The median time to self-sustained platelet count >20 G/L was 13 days (range: 7-29). Our study showed that the generic of plerixafor was practically identical to that of the originator (Mozobil®) with no significant difference (p = 0.52). This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of mobilization PBSC with generic plerixafor in ASCT in MM and lymphoma. Although these outcomes are encouraging, prospective comparison with other traditional auto-HCT regimens used for patients with MM and lymphoma is warranted.

Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients relapsing after previous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter report by the Polish Myeloma Study Group

BACKGROUND

Salvage autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) may be used to treat relapse of multiple myeloma occurring after previous autoHSCT. When insufficient number of hematopoietic stem cells was stored from the initial harvest, remobilization of stem cells is necessary.

PURPOSE

The analysis of stem cell remobilization after previous autoHSCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients, 60% males, median 59 years, were included. Median time interval between autoHSCT and remobilization was 42 months. The first remobilization was performed mostly after chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide (33%), cytarabine (43%), and etoposide (19%).

RESULTS

The first remobilization was successful in 67% patients. About 19% patients required plerixafor rescue, among whom it allowed for successful harvesting in 14%. Use of cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and etoposide allowed for successful remobilization in 53%, 84%, and 55% patients, respectively. Patients treated with cytarabine had the highest yield of CD34+ cells (median 7.5 × 10⁶ /kg vs 5.8 and 2.4 for etoposide and cyclophosphamide, P = .001). Higher percentage of patients was able to collect ≥2 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg during one leukapheresis after cytarabine (76% vs 21% for cyclophosphamide vs 36% for etoposide, P = .001). Cytarabine use was associated with lower risk of remobilization failure OR = 0.217, P = .02. Toxicity comprised mostly hematological toxicity (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia). One patient succumbed to septic shock.

CONCLUSION

Remobilization after previous autoHSCT is feasible only in a proportion of patients. Cytarabine is associated with the highest rate of successful mobilization and the highest yield of mobilized CD34+ cells. The toxicity requires careful surveillance of these patients.

Optimization of repeat plerixafor dosing for autologous peripheral blood stem-cell collection

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral CD34+ cells may be mobilized using filgrastim alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The addition of plerixafor can be efficacious, though guidelines for repeat dosing are lacking.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This quality improvement project was initiated to generate guidelines for repeat plerixafor dosing after retrospective evaluation of data in adult patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection.

RESULTS

Analysis included 195 patients: 119 (61 %) with multiple myeloma and 76 (39 %) with lymphoma. Patients given at least one dose of plerixafor (n = 109) were further divided: Group 1) (A) goal of 3 × 10E6/kg and day 1 peripheral blood CD34+ count < 30 × 10E6/L, vs (B) ≥ 30 × 10 E6/L; Group 2) (A) goal of 6 × 10E6/kg and day 1 peripheral blood CD34+ count < 50 × 10E6/L or < 50 % of collection goal after day 1, vs (B) ≥ 50 % of collection goal after day 1. Ninety five percent of cases in Group 1B and 88 % of cases in Group 2B did not receive additional plerixafor doses and all of them achieved their collection goals. In contrast, those in Groups 1A and 2A required additional plerixafor dosing and some mobilizations/collections were futile.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, with consideration of collection goal, peripheral blood CD34+ count, and CD34+ cell bag count on collection day 1, we have generated institutional guidelines for collection initiation and repeat plerixafor dosing. Long term, we predict these guidelines will optimize pharmacy, apheresis, and stem cell processing resources while improving the patient experience.

CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell dose as a predictor of engraftment and survival in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

Background/aim

High-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is the standard treatment strategy for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are eligible for it. The recommended dose of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) for adequate engraftment is above 2 × 106/kg. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the dose of CD34+ HPCs and survival in MM patients who underwent AHSCT at a tertiary care center.

Materials and methods

Enrolled in this study were 271 MM patients who underwent AHSCT between 2003 and 2019. Clinical characteristics of the patients, disease status pre-AHSCT, reinfused CD34+ cell doses, and neutrophil and platelet engraftment days were recorded, retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the dose of reinfused CD 34+ HPCs was <5 × 106/kg or ≥5 × 106/kg. The groups were compared in terms of engraftment and overall survival (OS) times.

Results

The median age of the patients was 54.8 (33–76) years. The median dose of infused CD34+ HPCs was 5.94 × 106/kg (1.47–59.5 × 106/kg). The median follow-up period was 54 months (4–211). The median OS of the patients was 103 months (11–144). The median neutrophil and platelet engraftment time was 10 (8–24) and 11 (7–40) days. Doses of <5 × 106/kg and ≥5 × 106/kg CD34+ HPC were reinfused in 38.1% and 61.9% of the patients, respectively. There was a negative significant correlation between the reinfused CD34+ cell level and neutrophil/platelet engraftment times (r = –0.32, P < 0.001; r = –0.27, P < 0.001, respectively). The median OS times were observed as 103 months (11–144) and 145 months (123–166) for patients who had been administered <5 × 106/kg and ≥5 × 106/kg of CD34+ HPCs, respectively (P = 0.009).

Conclusion

The increased amount of CD34+ autologous hematopoietic stem cell dose after high dose melphalan chemotherapy in MM patients shortened the platelet and neutrophil engraftment time and increased OS. Early platelet engraftment and administration of a CD34+ HPC count that is ≥5 × 106/kg can be considered as predictors of better survival in patients.

Threshold for optimal administration of plerixafor in autologous peripheral blood stem cell collections through CD34+ cell monitoring based on the experience from two Japanese university hospitals

Plerixafor was introduced to Japan in 2017 as a stem cell mobilization enhancement reagent, but the threshold for its use remains unclear. In this study, we assessed 57 patients treated with plerixafor (33 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and 24 with malignant lymphoma (ML) and 152 patients without plerixafor administration. When CD34+ cell pre-counts were between 5.5 and 20 cells/μL in MM or 6 and 21 cells/μL in ML, the CD34+ cell count increased significantly, attaining the highest yield in response to plerixafor (achievement rate by one leukapheresis is 93.3% and 91.7% in MM and ML, at P < .001 and P = .012, respectively). In case the CD34+ cell pre-count was less than 5.5 cells/μL, an increase of at least 7 cells/μL from baseline by plerixafor was the necessary condition to achieve successful collection through a two-time leukapheresis. Monitoring CD34+ cell numbers might improve the collection efficiency and reduce the cost.

Mobilization characteristics, blood graft composition, and outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation: Results from the prospective multicenter GOA study

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective noninterventional study aimed to evaluate the impact of mobilization characteristics and graft cellular content on hematologic recovery and outcome after auto-SCT among 68 patients with DLBCL.

RESULTS

Better mobilization capacity as manifested by blood CD34⁺ cell count >32 × 10⁶ /L and CD34⁺ cell yield of the first apheresis >2.75 × 10⁶ /kg correlated with faster neutrophil (P = .005 and P = .017) and platelet (P = .002 and P < .001) recovery. A higher number of infused CD34⁺ cells (> 2.65 × 10⁶ /kg) was associated with better 5-year overall survival (OS; 95% vs 67%, P = .012). The graft CD34⁺ CD133⁺ CD38^- cell count >0.07 × 10⁶ /kg was predictive of better 5-year OS (87% vs 63%; P = .008) and higher graft CD3⁺ cell count (>23.1 × 10⁶ /kg) correlated also with better 5-year OS (80% vs 40%, P = .008). In multivariate analysis only disease status of CR I at auto-SCT was associated with better progression-free survival (P = .014) and OS (P = .039).

CONCLUSION

The mobilization capacity of CD34⁺ cells impacted on early hematologic recovery in patients with DLBCL after auto-SCT. Higher graft CD34⁺ cell count and both CD34⁺ CD133⁺ CD38^- and CD3⁺ cells were also associated with better OS. The effect of optimal graft cellular composition on outcome in DLBCL should be evaluated in a randomized study.