Comparison between Upfront Transplantation and different Pretransplant Cytoreductive Treatment Approaches in Patients with High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for MDS-clinical issues, choosing preparative regimens and outcome

Despite the vast heterogeneity of myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS), treatment options are limited and an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative approach. While, subsequently, allo-HSCT is the treatment of choice in fit high-risk MDS patients younger than 70 years, it should only be considered in young and fit low-risk MDS patients who suffer from severe and life threatening cytopenias, and fail all available conservative treatment options. With the increasing use of mismatched or haploidentical donors, the majority of MDS patients will have a suitable donor available, however, matched donors should still be preferred if rapidly available. Strategies to prevent relapse after allo-HSCT are scarce, and include the use of donor lymphocytes or the experimental use of hypomethylating agents in patients with impeding relapse detected by MRD or chimerism evaluation. Here, we summarize current treatment options and factors to consider in the context of allo-HSCT in MDS.

Better pre-transplant treatment options for TP53-mutated MDS: cytoreductive or non-cytoreductive therapy?

Patients with TP53-mutated myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) have unfavorable prognoses; the benefit of cytoreductive treatment before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is debated. We retrospectively analyzed 284 MDS patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT; among which 49 had TP53 mutation, with 38 receiving cytoreduction and 11 treated exclusively with best supportive care (BSC) before transplantation. Regardless of TP53 allelic state, patients with mutated-TP53 had a lower overall survival rate and higher relapse rate than those with wild-type TP53 (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Among the TP53-mutated cohort, the 2-year overall survival rate in the cytoreduction group was comparable to that in the BSC group (34.6% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.53), and no other prognostic benefit was observed as well (all P < 0.05). Moreover, no prognostic difference was found among the chemotherapy subgroup, hypomethylating agent subgroup, and BSC subgroup (all P > 0.05). Patients in the pre-HSCT measurable residual disease (MRD) negative subgroup, pre-HSCT MRD-positive subgroup, and BSC subgroup exhibited similar prognoses (all P > 0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that pre-HSCT cytoreduction was not associated with post-transplant survival (all P > 0.05). In conclusion, TP53-mutated MDS patients have poor post-HSCT outcomes; compared to BSC, pre-HSCT cytoreduction doesn't improve prognosis, even in those with MRD negative before transplantation.

[Place of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for very high risk acute myeloblastic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (SFGM-TC)]

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, these transplants are complicated by a high rate of relapse in very high cytogenetic risk or refractory diseases. The benefit of this therapeutic strategy for these serious malignant hemopathies could therefore be reassessed. As part of the 14th workshop for the harmonization of allograft practices organized by the francophone society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC) (SFGM-TC) in Lille in September 2023, the role of allograft for very high risk or refractory AML and MDS was challenged after analysis of published studies.

Beyond HMAs: Novel Targets and Therapeutic Approaches

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) constitute a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic disorders with extremely variable clinical features and outcomes. Management of MDS is largely based on risk stratification of patients into either lower-risk or higher-risk categories using the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised and, more recently, on the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System. Lower-risk MDS is often managed with the goal of ameliorating cytopenias and improving quality of life, while higher-risk MDS is treated with therapies aimed at extending survival and delaying progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therapeutic strategies in lower-risk MDS patients may consist of erythropoiesis stimulating agents, luspatercept, and lenalidomide for selected patients. Furthermore, imetelstat has recently been added to the FDA-approved therapeutic armamentarium for lower-risk MDS. In higher-risk MDS, monotherapy with hypomethylating agents continues to be the standard of care. While several novel hypomethylating agent combinations have and are being studied in large randomized phase 3 clinical trials, including the combination of azacitidine and venetoclax, no combination to date have improved overall survival to azacitidine monotherapy. Moreover, biomarker-directed therapies as well as immonotherapeutic approaches are currently being evaluated in early phase trials. Despite recent advancements, the lack of therapeutic agents, particularly after the failure of first line therapy in higher risk MDS, continues to be a major hurdle in the management of MDS. In this review, we discuss the current treatment landscape of MDS and provide an overview of novel agents currently in clinical development that have the potential to alter our current treatment paradigms.

Current challenges in conditioning regimens for MDS transplantation

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a very heterogeneous clonal disorder. Patients with "higher-risk" MDS, defined by specific recurrent genetic abnormalities, have a poor prognosis because of a high risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia with low chemosensitivity. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment that offers durable disease control because the donor immune system allows graft-versus-MDS effects. In terms of preparation steps before transplantation, targeting the malignant clone by increasing the conditioning regimen intensity is still a matter of intense debate. MDS is mainly diagnosed in older patients, and high toxicity related to common myeloablative conditioning regimens has been reported. Efforts to include new drugs in the conditioning regimen to achieve the best malignant clone control without increasing toxicity have been made over the past 20 years. We summarized these retrospective and prospective studies and evaluated the limitations of the available evidence to delineate the ideal conditioning regimen.

Advances in the management of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: future prospects

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are defined using a number of prognostic scoring systems that include the degree of cytopenias, percentage of blasts, cytogenetic alterations, and more recently genomic data. HR-MDS encompasses characteristics such as progressive cytopenias, increased bone marrow blasts, unfavorable cytogenetics, and an adverse mutational profile. Survival is generally poor, and patients require therapy to improve outcomes. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine, decitabine, and more recently, oral decitabine/cedazuridine, are the only approved therapies for HR-MDS. These are often continued until loss of response, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Combinations including an HMA plus other drugs have been investigated but have not demonstrated better outcomes compared to single-agent HMA. Moreover, in a disease of high genomic complexity such as HR-MDS, therapy targeting specific genomic abnormalities is of interest. This review will examine the biological underpinnings of HR-MDS, its therapeutic landscape in the frontline and relapsed settings, as well as the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only known curative intervention for this disease.

WT1 gene mutations impact post-transplant relapse in myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts 2 patients

Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations are infrequent in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but MDS with WT1 mutations (WT1mut) is considered high risk for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation. The influence of WT1 mutations in patients with MDS after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of 136 MDS with excess blasts 2 (MDS-EB2) patients with available WT1 status who underwent their first allo-HSCT between 2017 and 2022 in our center. There were 20 (20/136, 15%) cases in the WT1mut group and 116 (116/136, 85%) cases in the WT1 wild-type (WT1wt) group. WT1mut patients had a higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than WT1wt cases (26.2% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.037) after allo-HSCT. Multivariate analysis of relapse showed that WT1 mutations (HR, 6.0; p = 0.002), TP53 mutations (HR, 4.2; p = 0.021), and ≥ 5% blasts in bone marrow (BM) at transplantation (HR, 6.6; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for relapse. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the risk factors. Two-year CIR differed significantly in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups (31.8%, 11.6%, and 0%, respectively). Hence, WT1 mutations may be related to post-transplant relapse in patients with MDS-EB2, which warrants further study.

Management of adult patients with CMML undergoing allo-HCT: recommendations from the EBMT PH&G Committee

ABSTRACT

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous disease presenting with either myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative option, but the inherent toxicity of this procedure makes the decision to proceed to allo-HCT challenging, particularly because patients with CMML are mostly older and comorbid. Therefore, the decision between a nonintensive treatment approach and allo-HCT represents a delicate balance, especially because prospective randomized studies are lacking and retrospective data in the literature are conflicting. International consensus on the selection of patients and the ideal timing of allo-HCT, specifically in CMML, could not be reached in international recommendations published 6 years ago. Since then, new, CMML-specific data have been published. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee assembled a panel of experts in the field to provide the first best practice recommendations on the role of allo-HCT specifically in CMML. Recommendations were based on the results of an international survey, a comprehensive review of the literature, and expert opinions on the subject, after structured discussion and circulation of recommendations. Algorithms for patient selection, timing of allo-HCT during the course of the disease, pretransplant strategies, allo-HCT modality, as well as posttransplant management for patients with CMML were outlined. The keynote message is, that once a patient has been identified as a transplant candidate, upfront transplantation without prior disease-modifying treatment is preferred to maximize chances of reaching allo-HCT whenever possible, irrespective of bone marrow blast counts.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More recently, prognostication and treatment have been determined by cytogenetic and molecular data. Specific genetic abnormalities, such as deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)), TP53 inactivation and SF3B1 mutation, are increasingly associated with disease phenotype and outcome, as reflected in the recently updated fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification 2022 (ICC 2022) classification systems. Treatment of lower-risk MDS is primarily symptom directed to ameliorate cytopenias. Higher-risk disease warrants disease-directed therapy at diagnosis; however, the only possible cure is an allogenic bone marrow transplant. Novel treatments aimed at rational molecular and cellular pathway targets have yielded a number of candidate drugs over recent years; however few new approvals have been granted. With ongoing research, we hope to increasingly offer our MDS patients tailored therapeutic approaches, ultimately decreasing morbidity and mortality.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in MDS patients of older age

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has evolved to an essential treatment in younger and more recently in elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the age group with the highest incidence. Less intense conditioning regimens and improvements in supportive therapy have reduced considerably transplant related mortality and in the same time increased the access to this curative treatment. Timing of HCT in the course of the disease assumes a crucial role. Detection of disease progression, geriatric assessment, comorbidity evaluation, and identification of transplant-specific risks are becoming increasingly important in this context. Novel statistical methods, molecular biomarkers, and quantification of tumor burden pre- and post-HCT will play an essential role in years to come. More effective and less toxic treatments to reduce the tumor burden before and/or after HCT are expected to improve the outcome. In this review article we discuss the current views and what we can expect.

Beyond the horizon: emerging therapeutic approaches in myelodysplastic neoplasms

Management of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) requires a personalized approach, with a focus on improving quality of life and extending lifespan. The International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised and the molecular International Prognostic Scoring System are key tools for risk stratification and management of MDS. They provide a framework for predicting survival and the risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. However, a major challenge in MDS management remains the limited therapeutic options available, especially after the failure of first-line therapies. In lower-risk MDS, the failure of erythropoietin-stimulating agents often leaves few alternatives, although in higher-risk MDS, the prognosis after hypomethylating agent failure is dismal. This highlights the urgent need for novel, more personalized therapeutic approaches. In this review, we discuss emerging novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of MDS. Several new therapeutic targets are currently being evaluated, offering hope for improved management of MDS in the future.

Outcomes of transplant-eligible patients with myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts registered in an observational study: The JALSG-CS11-MDS-SCT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, whether bridging therapy (BRT) including azacitidine (AZA) and combination chemotherapy (CCT) prior to allo-SCT should be performed is unclear. We analyzed BRT and the outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts (MDS-EB) who were ≤ 70 years old at the time of registration for a prospective observational study to clarify the optimal allo-SCT strategy for high-risk MDS. A total of 371 patients were included in this study. Among 188 patients (50.7%) who were considered for allo-SCT, 141 underwent allo-SCT. Among the patients who underwent allo-SCT, 64 received AZA, 29 received CCT, and 26 underwent allo-SCT without BRT as the initial treatment. Multivariate analysis identified BRT as an independent factor influencing overall survival (AZA vs. without BRT, hazard ratio [HR] 3.33, P = 0.005; CCT vs. without BRT, HR 3.82, P = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, BRT was independently associated with progression-free survival (AZA vs. without BRT: HR, 2.23; P = 0.041; CCT vs. without BRT: HR, 2.94; P = 0.010). Transplant-eligible patients with MDS-EB should undergo allo-SCT when clinically acceptable, and upfront allo-SCT without BRT may be superior to AZA or CCT.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes: New Methods of Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are malignant diseases arising from hematopoietic stem cells. Their overall incidence is 4 cases per 100 000 persons per year, and they are usually diagnosed when evaluating cytopenia. The median survival time is three years. Myelodysplastic syndromes take a variable course; one-quarter of patients go on to develop acute leukemia.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature from 2013 to 2022, including relevant guidelines, in the PubMed database. The time period was chosen to reflect developments since the publication of the latest EHA guidelines in 2013.

RESULTS

The gold standard of diagnosis is cytomorphology of the blood and bone marrow, supplemented by banding cytogenetics, histomorphology, and somatic mutation analyses. The new classification proposed by the WHO incorporates the molecular and cytogenetic findings. The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M), which takes somatic mutations into account, is now available as an aid to prognostication. Quality of life evaluation with standardized instruments is helpful in many ways. Low-risk patients are treated supportively with erythrocyte transfusions and iron chelation therapy. Erythropoietin-a can be given to patients whose erythropoietin level is less than 200ng/mL, lenalidomide to those with a 5q deletion, and luspatercept to those with an SF3B1 mutation. High-risk patients should be evaluated as early as possible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent. 5-azacytidine improves outcomes in patients for whom stem cell transplantation is not suitable.

CONCLUSION

Once a precise diagnosis has been established, new prognostic instruments such as the IPSS-M enable risk-adapted treatment based on the biological aspects of the patient's disease as well as his or her age and comorbidities.

Therapeutic approaches for the management of higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes

The heterogeneous nature of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) demands a risk-adapted therapeutic approach, and higher risk MDS, characterized by an increased risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia and inferior survival, is typically defined based on an integrated assessment of cytopenias, bone marrow blast percentage, and cytogenetic findings using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System. Incorporating mutational data could further refine the risk assessment and identify those with higher-than-expected disease risk. The principal therapeutic goal in this disease subset is to modify the natural history and prolong survival. Allogeneic stem cell transplant, the only potentially curative treatment, should be offered to eligible patients. Hypomethylating agents are the only approved treatment with unsatisfactory response rates and duration, and patients who failed prior hypomethylating agents unfortunately have dismal outcomes with urgent need of novel therapeutic agents. In this review, we provide the therapeutic landscape in higher risk MDS based on the current evidence and discuss the investigational treatment options under development.

The effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning on relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Relapse remains high in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB) or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to investigate whether granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and decitabine plus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning reduced relapse compared with busulfan-cyclophosphamide in this population.

METHODS

We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at six hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 14-65 years) had myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and HSCT comorbidity index of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) with no stratification and was implemented through an interactive web-based response system, which was independent of study site staff and investigators. G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised G-CSF 5 μg/kg daily subcutaneously (days -17 to -10), decitabine 20 mg/m² daily intravenously (days -14 to -10), busulfan 3·2 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -7 to -4), and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -3 and -2). Busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised the same dose and duration of busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was 2 year cumulative incidence of relapse. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02744742; the trial is complete.

FINDINGS

Between April 18, 2016, and Sept 30, 2019, 297 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) or busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) conditioning. 123 (61%) participants were male and 79 (31%) were female. Median follow-up was 32·4 months (IQR 10·0-43·0). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 10·9% (95% CI 5·8-17·9) in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 24·8% (16·8-33·5) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group (hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·19-0·79]; p=0·011). Within 100 days after transplantation, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group were infections (34 [34%] and 32 [32%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (30 [30%] and 30 [30%]), and gastrointestinal toxicity (28 [28%] and 29 [29%]). 11 (11%) patients in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 13 (13%) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group died of adverse events. There were no treatment related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning is a better choice than busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic HSCT. This conditioning could be a suitable therapuetic option for this patient population.

FUNDING

None.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms primarily affecting older persons, associated with dysplastic changes of bone marrow cells, peripheral cytopenias, and various risk of leukemic transformation. Although treatment with several drugs has shown improved disease control, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for MDS. The number of patients receiving a transplant, as well as survival, have increased past years because of the use of reduce-intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) as well as the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation. With treatment-related mortality as main limitation, pre-transplant evaluation is essential to assess risks for this older group of patients. In a recent randomized study, allo-HSCT with RIC for patients >50 years old with higher-risk MDS demonstrated superiority in survival compared with hypomethylating agents. Genetic mutations have been shown to significantly impact treatment outcomes including after transplant. Recently, a transplant-specific risk score (which includes age, donor type, performance status, cytogenetic category, recipient's cytomegalovirus status, percentage of blasts, and platelet count) has shown superiority in transplantation outcome prediction, compared with previous scoring systems. Survival remains low for most patients with TP53 mutations and novel treatment strategies are needed, such as administration of natural killer cells post-transplant, as there is no clear evidence that maintenance therapy after transplantation can improve outcomes.

Impact of treatments before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate pre-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) treatment, compare the endpoints related to disease management between pre-HSCT cytoreduction patients and upfront transplantation patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

METHODS

A total of 90 higher-risk MDS patients administered allo-HSCT in the Hematology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed, which included 28 patients with upfront transplantation and 62 patients with pre-transplant cytoreduction, including 30 patients received hypomethylating agents (HMA) and 32 patients received hypomethylating agents and induction chemotherapy (HMA+IC). Difference between the two groups regarding hematopoietic reconstruction, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse rate, non-relapse death (NRM), overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences in OS, DFS and NRM were found between the upfront transplantation and pre-transplant cytoreduction groups, and cumulative cGVHD occurrence and relapse rates were 35.7 % and 14.5 % (P = 0.029), and 10.7 % and 12.9 % (p = 0.535), respectively. Survival rates were significantly higher in the upfront transplantation and HMA+IC groups compared with the HMA group (3-year OS: 67.9 %, 68.8 %, 43.3 %, P = 0.039; 3-year RFS: 64.3 %, 62.5 %, 43.3 %, P = 0.107; 3-year NRM: 25.0 %, 21.9 %, 50.0 %, P = 0.025). Compared with the upfront transplantation group, overall response to cytoreductive therapy (OR) and non-response to cytoreductive therapy (NR), 3-year OS were 67.9 %, 73.0 % and 32.0 % (P < 0.001), 3-year RFS were 64.3 %, 73.0 % and 24.0 % (P < 0.001) and 3-year NRM were 25.0 %, 21.6 %, and 56.0 %, respectively (P < 0.001). Upfront transplantation (n = 11) had better OS and RFS compared with the cytoreductive group (n = 10) in patients with ≥ 10 % bone marrow blast cells before transplantation (3-year OS: 63.64 %, 22.22 %, p = 0.010; 3-year DFS: 63.64 %, 20.00 %, p = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The pre-transplant treatment regimen was an independent prognostic factor of OS and NRM. If the donor is suitable, upfront transplantation may provide longer survival in higher-risk MDS patients, which, however, may also increase the incidence of cGVHD. Even in patients with bone marrow blast cells ≥ 10 % before transplantation, upfront transplantation was not worse than transplantation after cytoreductive therapy. While waiting for a transplant, HMA+IC therapy may be a good pre-transplant treatment option.

Clinical and Cytogenetic Characterization of Early and Late Relapses in Patients Allografted for Myeloid Neoplasms with a Myelodysplastic Component

An improved understanding of relapse kinetics is required to optimize detection and treatment strategies for the post-transplant relapse of myeloid neoplasms. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed data from 91 patients allografted for MDS (n = 54), AML-MRC (n = 29) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, n = 8), who relapsed after transplant. Patients with early (<12 months, n = 56) and late relapse (>12 months, n = 35) were compared regarding patient-, disease- and transplant-related factors, including karyotype analyses at diagnosis and relapse. After a median follow-up of 17.4 months after relapse, late relapses showed improved outcomes compared with early relapses (2-yr OS 67% vs. 32%, p = 0.0048). Comparing frequency of distinct patient-, disease- and transplant-related factors among early and late relapses, complex karyotype (p = 0.0004) and unfavorable disease risk at diagnosis (p = 0.0008) as well as clonal evolution at relapse (p = 0.03) were more common in early than in late relapses. Furthermore, patients receiving transplant without prior cytoreduction or in complete remission were more frequently present in the group of late relapses. These data suggest that cytogenetics rather than disease burden at diagnosis and transplant-related factors determine the timepoint of post-transplant relapse and that upfront transplantation may be favored in order to delay relapse.

Myeloablative conditioning with thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine does not improve the outcome of patients transplanted with active leukemia: final results of the GITMO prospective trial GANDALF-01

The outcome of refractory/relapsed (R/R) acute leukemias is still dismal and their treatment represents an unmet clinical need. However, allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only potentially curative approach in this setting. A prospective study (GANDALF-01, NCT01814488; EUDRACT:2012-004008-37) on transplantation with alternative donors had been run by GITMO using a homogeneous myeloablative conditioning regimen with busulfan, thiotepa and fludarabine while GVHD prophylaxis was stratified by donor type. The study enrolled 101 patients; 90 found an alternative donor and 87 ultimately underwent allo-HSCT. Two-year overall survival of the entire and of the transplant population (primary endpoint) were 19% and 22%, without significant differences according to disease, donor type and disease history (relapsed vs refractory patients). Two-year progression-free survival was 19% and 17% respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 49% and 33% at two years. Acute grade II-IV and chronic GVHD occurred in 23 and 10 patients. Dose intensification with a myeloablative two-alkylating regimen as sole strategy for transplanting R/R acute leukemia does seem neither to improve the outcome nor to control disease relapse. A pre-planned relapse prevention should be included in the transplant strategy in this patient population.

Comparative analysis of Decitabine intensified BUCY2 and BUCY2 conditioning regimen for high-risk MDS patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The optimal conditioning regimen for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains elusive. This study aimed to explore the anti-leukemic efficacy and toxicity of Decitabine (Dec, 20 mg/m²/day, day -11 to -7) intensified BUCY2 vs. traditional regimen in high-risk MDS population. We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive high-risk MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT in our institution, comparing discrepancies in clinical characteristics and outcomes between cases using Dec-intensified BUCY2 (n = 52) and traditional BUCY2 regimen (n = 41). Three-year cumulative incidence of relapse after Dec-intensified BUCY2 conditioning was remarkably lower than that of patients using BUCY2 regimen (20.2% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.034). Overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 years for Dec-intensified BUCY2 group were 70.2% and 64.9%, respectively, which were significantly improved when compared with BUCY2 group (51.1% and 43.9%, p = 0.031 and p = 0.027). Furthermore, overall survival and disease-free survival for MDS cases receiving cytoreduction therapy were dramatically better than patients in non-cytoreduction group (p = 0.041, p = 0.047). In summary, the Dec-intensified conditioning regimen could be effective and feasible, providing prominent recurrence control with moderate toxicity for high-risk MDS patients. These patients might also benefit from pre-transplant cytoreductive therapeutic schedules. Larger randomized controlled trials are still needed to further confirm these conclusions.

Failure to reach hematopoietic allogenic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes planned for transplantation: a population-based study

The only potential cure for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). However, a proportion of patients who are HCT candidates do not finally get transplanted. This population-based study aimed to characterize HCT candidates were attempting to reach HCT fail and to identify causes and risk factors for failure. Data were collected from (1) the national Swedish registry, enrolling 291 transplant candidates between 2009-2018, and (2) Karolinska University Hospital, enrolling 131 transplantation candidates between 2000 and 2018. Twenty-five % (nation-wide) and 22% (Karolinska) failed to reach HCT. Reasons for failure to reach HCT were progressive and refractory disease (47%), no donor identified (22%), identification of comorbidity (18%), and infectious complications (14%). Factors associated with failure to reach HCT were IPSS-R cytogenetic risk-group very poor, mixed MDS/MPN disease, low blast count (0-4.9%), and low hemoglobin levels (≤7.9 g/dL). Transplanted patients had a longer overall survival (OS) compared to patients who failed to reach transplantation (83 months versus 14 months; p < 0.001). The survival advantage was seen for the IPSS-R risk groups intermediate, high, and very high. This study demonstrated that a high proportion of HCT-candidates fail to reach HCT and underlines the difficulties associated with bridging MDS patients to HCT.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 3.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) provide recommendations for the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of patients with MDS based on a review of clinical evidence that has led to important advances in treatment or has yielded new information on biologic factors that may have prognostic significance in MDS. The multidisciplinary panel of MDS experts meets on an annual basis to update the recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on some of the updates for the 2022 version of the NCCN Guidelines, which include treatment recommendations both for lower-risk and higher-risk MDS, emerging therapies, supportive care recommendations, and genetic familial high-risk assessment for hereditary myeloid malignancy predisposition syndromes.

Current status of pretransplant intensive chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents for myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndrome is a heterogeneous disease with survival probabilities ranging from a few months to several years. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curative treatment. Although access (up to 75 years) and outcome of HCT have improved steadily in recent years, high relapse rates and, to a lower extent, treatment related mortalities are a persisting problem. Reduction of tumor burden before HCT has been shown to decrease relapse incidence and often overall survival (OS) in hematological malignancies but the role of pretransplant therapy in MDS remains controversial. We reviewed the role of pretransplant therapy on outcome in MDS patients. No prospective randomized trial addressed this issue so far. Retrospective studies have shown that pretransplant therapy reduces the risk of relapse, but does not improve survival. In addition, registry studies from diagnosis with standard protocols are proposed in order to exclude patient selection. With the availability of new, more effective and low-toxicity therapies, it may be possible to achieve a significant improvement of OS in the future.

Meta-analysis of the benefit of hypomethylating agents before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndromes

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are effective therapies in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only way to cure MDS. According to the current literature, it is difficult to confirm whether HMAs bridging therapy is beneficial for MDS patients receiving allo-HSCT. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the effect of HMAs on long-term survival of the MDS patients. Databases, including PubMed, Embase Ovid, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies published up to January 10, 2021. Patients who accepted HMAs bridging to allo-HSCT were defined as experimental group, while patients who received the best supportive care (BSC) before allo-HSCT were control group. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. Seven studies were included in the final analysis. The final results showed no OS differences between patients accepted HMAs before allo-HSCT and those received BSC (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64-1.15, p = 0.32), indicating that MDS patients' long-term survival did not benefit from HMAs bridging therapy before allo-HSCT. This conclusion needs to be further verified by a large number of prospective randomized controlled trials, which have guiding significance for the treatment of MDS patients.

Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation Reveal the Effects of Chidamide Combined With Aspirin on Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Myelodysplastic Syndrome Cells Through PI3K/AKT Pathway

Chidamide (CDM), a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, is currently used for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Aspirin (ASA), an anti-inflammatory drug, has been shown to exert anticancer activity. Herein, we investigated the effect of CDM combined with ASA on myelodysplastic syndromes-derived acute myeloid leukemia (AML-MDS) cells and explored the underlying mechanism. The putative targets of CDM and ASA were predicted by network pharmacology approach. GO functional and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed by DAVID. Furthermore, experimental validation was conducted by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, Flow cytometry and Western blotting. Network pharmacology analysis revealed 36 AML-MDS-related overlapping genes that were targets of CDM and ASA, while 10 hub genes were identified by the plug-in cytoHubba in Cytoscape. Pathway enrichment analysis indicated CDM and ASA significantly affected PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Functional experiments demonstrated that the combination of CDM and ASA had a remarkable synergistic anti-proliferative effect by blocking the cell cycle in G0/G1 phase and inducing apoptosis. Mechanistically, the combination treatment significantly down-regulated the phosphorylation levels of PI3K and AKT. In addition, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), an activator of PI3K/AKT pathway, reversed the effects of the combination treatment. Our findings suggested that CDM combined with ASA exerted a synergetic inhibitory effect on cell growth by inactivating PI3K/AKT pathway, which might pave the way for effective treatments of AML-MDS.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation may overcome the adverse impact of myelofibrosis on the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome

Purpose

Myelofibrosis (MF) may serve as a poor prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This study explored the impact of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on the outcome of MDS patients with MF.

Patients and Methods

Three hundred and sixteen MDS patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Based on the degree of MF, we divided the patients into 2 groups: grade 0–1 (MF-0/1) and grade 2–3 (MF-2/3) groups. The clinical features, treatments, and prognosis in MDS patients with MF were analyzed.

Results

Forty-three (13.6%) patients were diagnosed as MF-2/3. Complex karyotypes were more common in the MF-2/3 compared to MF-0/1 groups (P = 0.002). The overall response rate (ORR) of cytoreduction was 49.0%, along with 53.3% in the MF-0/1 and 16.7% in MF-2/3 groups (P = 0.017). In total, 141 patients underwent allo-HSCT, including 121 in the MF-0/1 and 20 in MF-2/3 groups. The median time to neutrophil reconstruction was 12 (range: 7–34) and 14 (range: 10–45) days (P = 0.005), and platelet reconstruction was 14 (range: 8–68) and 18 (range: 8–65) days (P = 0.045) in the MF-0/1 and MF-2/3 groups, respectively. However, the cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment achieved at day + 30 was not different between the two groups (P = 0.107, P = 0.303, respectively). Non-relapse mortality, relapse, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Among patients with allo-HSCT, the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 68.5% (95% CI: 60.1–76.9%) and 68.4% (95% CI: 47.4–89.4%) in the MF-0/1 and MF-2/3 groups, respectively, (P = 0.636). Among patients without allo-HSCT, the 2-year OS was 49.9% (95% CI: 40.7–59.1%) and 19.2% (95% CI: 0–39.6%) in the MF-0/1 and MF-2/3 groups, respectively, (P = 0.002). In multivariate cox analysis, complex karyotype was an unfavorable factor for relapse (HR, 4.16; P = 0.006), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 2.16; P = 0.020), and OS (HR, 2.47; P = 0.009) post-transplantation.

Conclusion

Patients with MF-2/3 have more complex karyotypes and lower ORR of cytoreduction in MDS. Among patients without allo-HSCT, patients with MF-2/3 have a worse prognosis than those with MF-0/1. However, the adverse impact of MF on prognosis may be overcome by allo-HSCT.

Current challenges and unmet medical needs in myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms that are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, variable cytopenias, and a risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Most patients with MDS are affected by anemia and anemia-related symptoms, which negatively impact their quality of life. While many patients with MDS have lower-risk disease and are managed by existing treatments, there currently is no clear standard of care for many patients. For patients with higher-risk disease, the treatment priority is changing the natural history of the disease by delaying disease progression to acute myeloid leukemia and improving overall survival. However, existing treatments for MDS are generally not curative and many patients experience relapse or resistance to first-line treatment. Thus, there remains an unmet need for new, more effective but tolerable strategies to manage MDS. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of MDS, and it is becoming clear that the diverse nature of genetic abnormalities that drive MDS demands a complex and personalized treatment approach. This review will discuss some of the challenges related to the current MDS treatment landscape, as well as new approaches currently in development.

Comparison Between 5-Azacytidine Treatment and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients With Advanced MDS According to Donor Availability (VidazaAllo Study)

PURPOSE

In contrast to 5-azacytidine (5-aza), allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a curative treatment strategy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but therapy-related mortality (TRM) limits its broader use in elderly patients with MDS. The present prospective multicenter study compared HSCT following 5-aza pretreatment with continuous 5-aza treatment in patients with higher-risk MDS age 55-70 years.

METHODS

One hundred ninety patients with a median age of 63 years were enrolled. Patients received 4-6 cycles of 5-aza followed by HLA-compatible HSCT after reduced-intensity conditioning or by continuous 5-aza if no donor was identified.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients did not fulfill inclusion criteria (n = 20), died (n = 2) withdrew informed consent (n = 5), or were excluded for an unknown reason (n = 1). 5-aza induction started in 162 patients, but only 108 (67%) were eligible for subsequent allocation to HSCT (n = 81) or continuation of 5-aza (n = 27) because of disease progression (n = 26), death (n = 12), or other reasons (n = 16). Seven percent died during 5-aza before treatment allocation. The cumulative incidence of TRM after HSCT at 1 year was 19%. The event-free survival and overall survival after 5-aza pretreatment and treatment allocation at 3 years were 34% (95% CI, 22 to 47) and 50% (95% CI, 39 to 61) after allograft and 0% and 32% (95% CI, 14 to 52) after continuous 5-aza treatment (P < .0001 and P = .12), respectively. Fourteen patients progressing after continuous 5-aza received a salvage allograft from an alternative donor, and 43% were alive at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In older patients with MDS, reduced-intensity conditioning HSCT resulted in a significantly improved event-free survival in comparison with continuous 5-aza therapy. Bridging with 5-aza to HSCT before is associated with a considerable rate of dropouts because of progression, mortality, and adverse events.

Pre-transplant therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the effects of cytoreduction before transplantation.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Chinese databases were searched to identify studies comparing post-transplant outcomes in MDS patients receiving different pre-transplant therapy. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighteen reports were included. Post-transplant outcomes were similar for MDS patients receiving pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy and upfront transplantation in terms of overall survival (OS: HR, 0.92; 95 % CI, 0.79-1.07), relapse-free survival (RFS: HR, 1.18; 95 % CI, 0.94-1.47), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR: HR, 1.08; 95 % CI, 0.88-1.33), and non-relapse mortality (NRM: HR, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.74-1.18). Pre-transplant hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and chemotherapy were not different regarding post-transplant OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM. Achieving complete remission (CR) before transplantation was associated with increased RFS (HR, 0.80; 95 %CI, 0.63-1.00) and decreased NRM (HR, 0.53; 95 % CI, 0.32-0.90) when compared with upfront transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely transplantation is of great value for MDS patients. Suitable pre-transplant cytoreduction could be used during the search for donors.

Upfront transplantation may have better outcomes than pretransplant cytoreductive therapy for treating patients with MDS-EB-1 or MDS-EB-2

Whether patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) benefit from pretransplant cytoreductive therapy remains controversial. Our study compared the outcomes of upfront transplantation with those of pretransplant cytoreductive therapy in the patients who received transplantation and those who dropped out due to cytoreductive therapy-related adverse effects. Patients with MDS-EB-1 or MDS-EB-2 were enrolled and divided into three groups based on therapy pretransplantation: upfront transplantation (upfront, n = 54), induction chemotherapy (CT, n = 66) and hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 37) alone. One hundred fifty-seven patients were enrolled and 124 received allo-HSCT, with 5.6%, 28.8% and 29.7% of drop-out rate of transplantation in upfront, CT and HMA groups (P = .030), respectively. Overall therapy-related mortality (TRM), cytoreductive therapy and transplant-related mortality was 13.0%, 32.4% and 28.4% (P = .028), and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 73.6%, 43.4% and 46.9% (P = .033). Multivariate analysis showed that CT and HMA were risk factors for TRM and OS, and transplantation was a protective factor for OS. In transplant patients, 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 10.6%, 20.4% and 20.3% (P = .033), 5-year TRM was 14.5%, 20.0% and 17.6% (P = .651), OS was 77.3%, 64.3% and 68.8% (P = .047) and DFS was 74.0%, 63.0% and 65.8% (P = .042). Multivariate analysis showed that CT was a risk factor for DFS, while CT, HMA and poor karyotype were risk factors for relapse. Results suggested that pretransplant cytoreductive therapy was not associated with better outcomes in the patients who had undergone transplantation. Therefore, upfront transplantation may be preferable for MDS patients.

Prognostic impact of pretransplant measurable residual disease assessed by peripheral blood WT1-mRNA expression in patients with AML and MDS

OBJECTIVE

As peripheral blood (PB) Wilm's Tumor 1 (WT1)-mRNA expression is established as MRD-marker during conventional AML chemotherapy, impact of pretransplant WT1 expression remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to assess prognostic impact of pretransplant WT1 expression on post-transplant outcome in patients with AML/MDS.

METHODS

In 64 AML/MDS patients, pretransplant WT1 expression was retrospectively analyzed using a standardized assay offering high sensitivity, specificity, and a validated cut-off. Patients were divided into three groups determined by pretransplant remission and WT1 expression. Post-transplant outcome of these groups was compared regarding cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free (RFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Pretransplant forty-six patients (72%) showed hematologic remission, including 21 (46%) MRD-negative and 25 (54%) MRD-positive patients indicated by WT1 expression, while 18 refractory patients (28%) showed active disease. Two-year estimates of post-transplant CIR, RFS, and OS were similar in MRD-positive (61%, 37%, 54%) and refractory patients (70%, 26%, 56%), but significantly inferior compared with MRD-negative patients (10%, 89%, 90%). After multivariable adjustment, pretransplant MRD negativity measured by WT1 expression retained its prognostic impact on CIR (P = .008), RFS (P = .005), and OS (P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

PB WT1 expression represents a useful method to estimate pretransplant MRD, which is highly predictable for post-transplant outcome and may help improving peri-transplant management in AML/MDS patients.

Erythroid nuclear dysplasia is associated with inferior outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Disease burden prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is difficult to assess in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), particularly in patients without excess blasts. We assessed whether morphologic dysplasia at the time of transplant can be a metric of disease burden that is associated with post-transplant outcomes in MDS patients. We identified 84 MDS patients undergoing allogeneic HCT at our institution between 2010 and 2017 who received a bone marrow evaluation immediately prior to HCT. Dysplasia was independently determined by two hematopathologists blinded to existing pathology reports. Erythroid nuclear dysplasia, but not megakaryocytic or myeloid, was associated with post-HCT outcomes. Presence compared to absence of erythroid nuclear dysplasia was associated with lower 2-year progression-free survival (PFS; 34 % vs 62 %, p = 0.0495) and 2-year overall survival (OS; 34 % vs 62 %, p = 0.042). In a multivariate analysis including age, IPSS-R at the time of transplant, pre-HCT therapy, and donor type as covariates, erythroid nuclear dysplasia remained associated with lower PFS (HR 2.6, p = 0.036) and OS (HR 2.7, p = 0.028). Dysplasia assessment prior to transplant may serve as an estimate of disease burden in MDS and identify high-risk patients who merit additional therapies pre- or post-transplant.

Comparison of Upfront Transplantation and Pretransplant Cytoreductive Therapy for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative therapy for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the value of pretransplant cytoreduction remains debatable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of upfront transplantation and pretransplant cytoreduction. Of 69 patients, 39 received upfront allo-HSCT and 30 received pretransplant cytoreduction, including chemotherapy (n = 16), hypomethylating agents (HMAs, n = 6), and HMAs with chemotherapy (n = 8).

RESULTS

The upfront group achieved similar overall survival (OS) and a trend of better progression-free survival (PFS) from diagnosis compared with the cytoreduction group (3-year PFS, 64.0% vs. 44.4%, P = .076). Posttransplant outcomes were comparable between the two groups in terms of OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In patients with ≥2 mutations, the upfront group achieved better OS and PFS (3-year OS, 100.0% vs. 68.6%, P = .044; 3-year PFS: 92.3% vs. 43.9%, P = .016) than the cytoreduction group. Patients achieving remission in the cytoreduction group had outcomes similar to the upfront group, but those without remission before transplantation had a significantly worse posttransplant OS (3-year OS, 46.7% vs. 75.7%, P = .038). Patients with pretransplant HMAs had better PFS than those with chemotherapy or HMAs plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with pretransplant cytoreduction, upfront allo-HSCT might provide more benefit to some patients with advanced MDS if there are suitable donors. HMAs would be a good alternative during the donor search.

A systematic review of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes clinical trials to determine the benchmark of azacitidine and explore alternative endpoints for overall survival

The hypomethylating agent azacitidine can prolong overall survival (OS) in patients with higher risk-myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) compared to conventional regimens. However, outcomes differ largely between studies, making it challenging to determine the contribution of novel therapies added to azacitidine. Further, a discrepancy is seen between complete (CR) or partial (PR) response rates and OS improvement with azacitidine, making it challenging to rely on earlier endpoints than OS. We conducted a systematic literature search and study-level systematic review of 237 clinical studies to better understand outcomes for HR-MDS patients treated with azacitidine. Pooled marrow CR was 9% (N = 2654; 95% CI: 6-13 %), CR rate was 17 % (N = 6943; 95% CI: 15-20 %), and median OS (mOS) was 18.6 months (N = 2820; 95% CI: 15.3-21.9). A weak correlation to mOS was detected with CR rate (207 patient cohorts, Pearson's r = 0.315; P < 0.0005), and a much stronger correlation with median progression-free survival (mPFS) (r=0.88, P = 3 × 10^-14). Six-months progression-free survival rates correlated with 1-year OS rates but were only infrequently reported (N = 41 patient cohorts) therefore not allowing a robust recommendation for a surrogate to the established OS endpoint. Larger patient numbers and patient-level data appear necessary, especially for designing future clinical trials using azacitidine combinations.

Pre-transplantation cytoreduction does not benefit advanced myelodysplastic syndrome patients after myeloablative transplantation with grafts from family donors

BACKGROUND

The role of pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) cytoreduction with either induction chemotherapy (IC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in treating advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains debatable. We aimed to evaluate pre-HSCT strategies by comparing the endpoints related to disease control between advanced MDS patients with pre-HSCT cytoreduction and those with best supportive care.

METHODS

We described 228 consecutive advanced MDS patients who received HSCT from a haploidentical donor (HID, n = 162) or matched related donor (MSD, n = 66) with uniform myeloablative conditioning regimens between January 2015 and December 2018. Of these 228 patients, 131 (57.5%) were treated exclusively with pre-HSCT best supportive care (BSC), 49 (22.5%) were given HMA, and 48 (21.1%) received both IC and HMA. Propensity score-matching analysis, multivariate analyses, and subgroup analyses were performed to elucidate the impact of pre-HSCT strategies on transplant outcomes.

RESULTS

The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 78.2% and 70.0% for the BSC and cytoreduction cohorts (P = 0.189) and were 78.2%, 66.7%, and 73.2% for the BSC, HMA, and HMA+IC groups, respectively (P = 0.269). A propensity score-matching analysis confirmed that the 3-year RFS rates were 81.9%, 87.5%, and 66.9% for BSC, cytoreduction complete remission (CR), and cytoreduction non-CR groups, respectively (P = 0.051). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that pre-HSCT cytoreduction, older patient age, monosomal karyotype, and interval between diagnosis and HSCT were poor prognostic factors for RFS. In the subgroup analyses, BSC was associated with longer RFS compared to cytoreduction among the younger patients, those with international prognostic scoring system intermediate-2/high risk at diagnosis, and those with intermediate/poor cytogenetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Different pre-HSCT therapies did not yield discrepant post-HSCT outcomes. No benefit in terms of post-HSCT outcomes were correlated with pre-HSCT cytoreduction in advanced MDS even for cytoreduction CR patients. Early referral to HSCT is essential for advanced MDS patients.

How to select older patients with acute myeloid leukemia fit for intensive treatment?

Outcomes of the treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are unsatisfactory due to a higher incidence of negative patient- and disease-related risk factors connected with aging. Prediction of poor tolerance to aggressive treatment and low response to standard intensive chemotherapy are the main root causes why the treatment decision is challenging. For a long time, negative prognostic factors for treatment outcomes, overall survival, and early death such as the age itself, low-performance status, high-comorbidity burden, adverse cytogenetics, and secondary AML have been known, and they are routinely taken into account during therapeutic balance. In consideration of the risk factors and specific laboratory results, prognostic models have been created. Despite the abovementioned facts, the survival of older patients with AML remains very poor, that holds true even for the intensive therapy. For that reason, there is an increased effort to find a better approach how to select patients who would benefit from intensive treatment without decreasing their quality of life through severe complications with risk of high treatment-related mortality. Based on the results of clinical studies, the geriatric assessment could be the missing step which would help select older patients who are really fit for intensive treatment and who will benefit from it the most. This review focuses on the risk factors that should be taken under advisement when the decision about the treatment is made. With reference to the published information, we propose an algorithm how to identify fit, vulnerable, and frail patients.

Prediction of Response and Survival Following Treatment with Azacitidine for Relapse of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

To provide long-term outcome data and predictors for response and survival, we retrospectively analyzed all 151 patients with relapse of myeloid neoplasms after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) who were uniformly treated with first-line azacitidine (Aza) salvage therapy at our center. Patients were treated for molecular (39%) or hematologic relapse (61%), with a median of 5 cycles of Aza and at least one donor lymphocyte infusion in 70% of patients. Overall response was 46%, with 41% achieving complete (CR) and 5% achieving partial remission. CR was achieved after a median of 4 cycles and lasted for a median of 11 months (range 0.9 to 120 months). With a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 1 to 122 months), the 2-year survival rate was 38% ± 9%, including 17 patients with ongoing remission for >5 years. Based on results from multivariate analyses, molecular relapse and time to relapse were integrated into a score, clearly dividing patients into 3 subgroups with CR rates of 71%, 39%, and 29%; and 2-year survival rates of 64%, 38%, and 27%, respectively. In the subgroup of MDS and secondary AML, receiving upfront transplantation was associated with superior response and survival, and therefore pretransplant strategy was integrated together with relapse type into a MDS–sAML-specific score. Overall, Aza enables meaningful responses and long-term survival, which is a predictable with a simple-to-use scoring system.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: moving towards personalized management

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) share their origin in the hematopoietic stem cell but have otherwise very heterogeneous biological and genetic characteristics. Clinical features are dominated by cytopenia and a substantial risk for progression to acute myeloid leukemia. According to the World Health Organization, MDS is defined by cytopenia, bone marrow dysplasia and certain karyotypic abnormalities. The understanding of disease pathogenesis has undergone major development with the implementation of next-generation sequencing and a closer integration of morphology, cytogenetics and molecular genetics is currently paving the way for improved classification and prognostication. True precision medicine is still in the future for MDS and the development of novel therapeutic compounds with a propensity to markedly change patients' outcome lags behind that for many other blood cancers. Treatment of higher-risk MDS is dominated by monotherapy with hypomethylating agents but novel combinations are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Agents that stimulate erythropoiesis continue to be first-line treatment for the anemia of lower-risk MDS but luspatercept has shown promise as second-line therapy for sideroblastic MDS and lenalidomide is an established second-line treatment for del(5q) lower-risk MDS. The only potentially curative option for MDS is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, until recently associated with a relatively high risk of transplant-related mortality and relapse. However, recent studies show increased cure rates due to better tools to target the malignant clone with less toxicity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of the clinical evaluation, biology and therapeutic interventions for this spectrum of disorders.