Comparative analysis of the immune responses in cancer cells irradiated with X-ray, proton and carbon-ion beams

Carbon ion irradiation mobilizes antitumor immunity: from concept to the clinic

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), a type of particle therapy, is at the forefront of clinical oncology treatments due to its superior physical properties and biological performance. Although CIRT has demonstrated outstanding therapeutic outcomes in clinical settings, the biological mechanisms underpinning its effects, particularly its immunogenic potential and the superiority of its induced antitumor immune response compared to photon radiotherapy, remain areas of active investigation. This review summarizes the latest research progress on the mechanisms of antitumor immune responses triggered by CIRT and discusses preclinical and clinical studies related to combined CIRT and immunotherapy (CCIT). Against the backdrop of extensive research and significant clinical efficacy achieved by combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy, this review provides a theoretical foundation for a better understanding of the superior tumor cell-killing effects of CIRT and the underlying immunological mechanisms. Further insights into the factors affecting the efficacy, toxic effects, and developmental limitations of this combination therapy mode will be instrumental in guiding the conduction of CCIT studies.

Carbon-ion irradiation together with autophagy inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibitors protect against pancreatic cancer development in mouse model

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer remains fatal because of resistance to chemo-, radio-, and immunotherapies. Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been beneficial for patients with pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify the mechanism by which CIRT exerts its anticancer activity, particularly in combination with immunotherapy.

METHODS

We implanted murine pancreatic cancer cells treated with CIRT and autophagy inhibitor HCQ (CIRT+HCQ) into syngeneic mice, followed by the application of a regulatory T (Treg) cell blockade using immune-checkpoint inhibitors. We compared CIRT+HCQ-treated tumors with those implanted without any treatment. Further, we also implanted CIRT+HCQ-treated pancreatic tumors into CD8+ T cell-depleted mice. To characterize immunological alterations, we conducted immunohistology and flow cytometry of implanted tumors.

RESULTS

CIRT+HCQ-treated tumors exhibited reduced growth, higher numbers of CD8+ T cells, and lower numbers of Treg cells compared with control tumors. CD8+ T cell depletion restored growth in CIRT+HCQ-treated tumors. A Treg blockade resulted in greater tumor growth remission and elevated levels of intratumor CD8+ T cells in mice bearing CIRT+HCQ-treated tumors but not in mice bearing control tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Treg cell-targeted therapy exerted an anticancer effect in mice bearing CIRT+HCQ-treated tumors but not in those bearing untreated pancreatic tumors by activating cancer-specific CD8+ T cells.

Immunological Effects of Proton Radiotherapy: New Opportunities and Challenges in Cancer Therapy

Radiation therapy can be categorised by particle type into photon, proton and heavy ion therapies. Proton radiotherapy is highlighted due to its unique physical properties, such as the Bragg peak and minimal exit dose, which offer superior dose distribution. This makes proton radiotherapy especially advantageous for treating tumours near vital organs with complex structures, such as gliomas near the brain, nasopharyngeal carcinoma near the brainstem and mediastinal tumours near the heart. Proton irradiation can induce distant effects through immunogenicity within the target area. The reduced low-dose zone outside the target provides better lymphatic system protection and immune benefits. Additionally, combining proton radiotherapy with immunotherapy may offer further biological advantages. These features make proton radiotherapy a promising option in cancer treatment. This article may aid in the understanding of proton radiotherapy and its immune effects and lead to new effective options for tumour treatment.

Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Macrophage Secretion of ATP and HMGB1 to Enhance Irradiation-Led Immunogenic Cell Death

ATP (adenosine triphosphate) and HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1 protein) are key players in treatments that induce immunogenic cell death (ICD). However, conventional therapies, including radiotherapy, are often insufficient to induce ICD. In this study, we explore a strategy using nanoparticle-loaded macrophages as a source of ATP and HMGB1 to complement radiation-induced intrinsic and adaptive immune responses. To this end, we tested three inorganic particles, namely, iron oxide nanoparticles (ION), aluminum oxide nanoparticles (AON), and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZON), in vitro with bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and then in vivo in syngeneic tumor models. Our results showed that ION was the most effective of the three nanoparticles in promoting the secretion of ATP and HMGB1 from macrophages without negatively affecting macrophage survival. Secretions from ION-loaded macrophages can activate BMDCs. Intratumoral injection of ION-loaded macrophages significantly enhanced tumor infiltration and activation of dendritic cells and cytotoxic T cells. Moreover, exogenous ION macrophages can enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy. In addition, direct injection of ION can also enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy, which is attributed to ION uptake by and stimulation of endogenous macrophages. Instead of directly targeting cancer cells, our strategy targets macrophages and uses them as a secretory source of ATP and HMGB1 to enhance radiation-induced ICD. Our research introduces a new nanoparticle-based immunomodulatory approach that may have applications in radiotherapy and beyond.

Current status and prospect of particle therapy for esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is among the top causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and the main treatment modality for locally advanced esophageal cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The current photon-based radiotherapy modalities and procedures have increased the incidence of treatment-related cardiac and pulmonary complications. Additionally, anatomical changes in the esophagus resulting from diaphragmatic movement, weight loss, and tumor progression present challenges for radiotherapy. These challenges have spurred interest in particle therapies, such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and heavy-ion therapy, for esophageal cancer. This paper comprehensively reviews the dosimetric advantages, clinical efficacy, and limitations of PBT and heavy-ion therapy for esophageal cancer and discusses their prospects. This highlights the unique dosimetric benefits of these therapies, particularly their ability to deliver high-dose radiation precisely to the tumor while sparing the surrounding normal organs and tissues. Although PBT and heavy-ion therapy demonstrate superior clinical efficacy compared to photon therapy, they are not without limitations. Multiple studies are needed to further validate and supplement the existing clinical and preclinical data to better exploit the benefits of PBT and thereby provide improved survival advantages to these patients.

Harnessing the cGAS-STING pathway to potentiate radiation therapy: current approaches and future directions

In this review, we cover the current understanding of how radiation therapy, which uses ionizing radiation to kill cancer cells, mediates an anti-tumor immune response through the cGAS-STING pathway, and how STING agonists might potentiate this. We examine how cGAS-STING signaling mediates the release of inflammatory cytokines in response to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA entering the cytoplasm. The significance of this in the context of cancer is explored, such as in response to cell-damaging therapies and genomic instability. The contribution of the immune and non-immune cells in the tumor microenvironment is considered. This review also discusses the burgeoning understanding of STING signaling that is independent of inflammatory cytokine release and the various mechanisms by which cancer cells can evade STING signaling. We review the available data on how ionizing radiation stimulates cGAS-STING signaling as well as how STING agonists may potentiate the anti-tumor immune response induced by ionizing radiation. There is also discussion of how novel radiation modalities may affect cGAS-STING signaling. We conclude with a discussion of ongoing and planned clinical trials combining radiation therapy with STING agonists, and provide insights to consider when planning future clinical trials combining these treatments.

Carbon Ion Irradiation Activates Anti-Cancer Immunity

Carbon ion beams have the unique property of higher linear energy transfer, which causes clustered damage of DNA, impacting the cell repair system. This sometimes triggers apoptosis and the release in the cytoplasm of damaged DNA, leading to type I interferon (IFN) secretion via the activation of the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes pathway. Dendritic cells phagocytize dead cancer cells and damaged DNA derived from injured cancer cells, which together activate dendritic cells to present cancer-derived antigens to antigen-specific T cells in the lymph nodes. Thus, carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) activates anti-cancer immunity. However, cancer is protected by the tumor microenvironment (TME), which consists of pro-cancerous immune cells, such as regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor-associated macrophages. The TME is too robust to be destroyed by the CIRT-mediated anti-cancer immunity. Various modalities targeting regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor-associated macrophages have been developed. Preclinical studies have shown that CIRT-mediated anti-cancer immunity exerts its effects in the presence of these modalities. In this review article, we provide an overview of CIRT-mediated anti-cancer immunity, with a particular focus on recently identified means of targeting the TME.

Proton Treatment Suppresses Exosome Production in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Proton therapy (PT) is emerging as an effective and less toxic alternative to conventional X-ray-based photon therapy (XRT) for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) owing to its clustered dose deposition dosimetric characteristics. For optimal efficacy, cancer therapies, including PT, must elicit a robust anti-tumor response by effector and cytotoxic immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). While tumor-derived exosomes contribute to immune cell suppression in the TME, information on the effects of PT on exosomes and anti-tumor immune responses in HNSCC is not known. In this study, we generated primary HNSCC cells from tumors resected from HNSCC patients, irradiated them with 5 Gy PT or XRT, and isolated exosomes from cell culture supernatants. HNSCC cells exposed to PT produced 75% fewer exosomes than XRT- and non-irradiated HNSCC cells. This effect persisted in proton-irradiated cells for up to five days. Furthermore, we observed that exosomes from proton-irradiated cells were identical in morphology and immunosuppressive effects (suppression of IFN-γ release by peripheral blood mononuclear cells) to those of photon-irradiated cells. Our results suggest that PT limits the suppressive effect of exosomes on cancer immune surveillance by reducing the production of exosomes that can inhibit immune cell function.

A protocol for a randomized trial evaluating the role of carbon-ion radiation therapy plus camrelizumab for patients with locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Management of locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LR NPC) is difficult. Although carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) could substantially improve the overall survival (OS) of those patients, around 40% of the patients may still develop local failure. Further improvement of the disease control is necessary. Immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) becomes a promising antitumor treatment. The role of ICIs was proved in head and neck cancers including recurrent/metastatic NPC. Preclinical studies indicated potential synergistic effects between radiation therapy and ICIs. Therefore, we conduct a randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, along with CIRT in patients with LR NPC.

METHODS

Patients will be randomly assigned at 1:1 to receive either standard CIRT with 63 Gy (relatively biological effectiveness, [RBE]) in 21 fractions, or standard CIRT plus concurrent camrelizumab. Camrelizumab will be administered intravenously with a dose of 200 mg, every 2 week, for a maximum of 1 year. We estimate addition of camrelizumab will improve the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) from 45% to 60%. A total of 146 patients (with a 5% lost to follow-up rate) is required to yield a type I error of 0.2, and a power of 0.8.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The results of the trial may shed insights on the combined therapy with ICIs and CIRT.

Carbon ion irradiation exerts antitumor activity by inducing cGAS-STING activation and immune response in prostate cancer-bearing mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

As an advanced radiotherapy technique, carbon ion radiotherapy has demonstrated good efficacy and low toxicity for prostate cancer patients, but the radiobiological mechanism of killing tumor cells has not been fully elucidated. This study aims to explore the antitumor effects of carbon ion irradiation (CIR) through investigating the immune response induced by CIR in prostate cancer-bearing mice and the underlying molecular mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We established subcutaneous transplantation tumor models of prostate cancer to evaluate the tumor inhibition effect of CIR. Investigation of immunophenotype alterations were assessed by flow cytometry. Immunofluorescence, western blot, and real-time quantitative PCR was employed to analyze the activation of cGAS-STING pathway.

RESULTS

CIR showed more powerful tumor growth control than photon irradiation in immunocompetent syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. CIR exerts antitumor effect by triggering immune response, characterized by increased CD4+ T cells and macrophages in tumor, enhanced CD8+ T cells and T effector memory cells in spleen, improved IFN-γ production of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and reduced exhausted T cells in tumor and spleen. Additionally, production of cytoplasmic double-stranded DNA, protein levels of p-TBK1 and p-IRF3 in the cGAS-STING pathway, and gene expression levels of downstream interferon-stimulated genes were significantly increased after CIR in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment of RM1 tumor-bearing mice with the STING inhibitor C-176 impaired the antitumor effect of CIR.

CONCLUSION

The excellent antitumor activity of CIR in immunocompetent prostate cancer-bearing C57BL/6 mice may be attributed to stronger induction of antitumor immune response and higher activation of cGAS-STING pathway.

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors after proton beam therapy in head and neck mucosal melanoma: a case series

Proton beam therapy (PBT) has shown promising efficacy in treating locally advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma despite its poor prognosis. Although PBT may improve the efficacy of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the safety of ICIs in patients who have previously received PBT has not been established. Hence, this study evaluated the safety of ICIs in patients who had recurrent mucosal melanoma after PBT. Between April 2013 and June 2022, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Seven patients were treated with ICIs after their head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) recurred after PBT. Four of the seven patients experienced grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to irAE in the irradiation field, two patients had grade 3 hypopituitarism. Other grade 3 or higher irAEs included an increase in serum alanine aminotransferase in two patients and gastritis in one, and two patients discontinued ICI due to the irAEs. All irAEs were resolved with appropriate management. Although administering ICIs after PBT may increase the risk of irAEs, especially in the irradiation field, they appear manageable. These findings could help in the development of a treatment strategy for locally advanced HNMM that includes PBT and subsequent ICIs.

Gold-Nanoparticles-Enhanced Production of Reactive Oxygen Species in Cells at Spread-Out Bragg Peak under Proton Beam Radiation

This study investigates the radiobiological effects of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) as radiosensitizers for proton beam therapy (PBT). Specifically, we explore the enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in GNP-loaded tumor cells irradiated by a 230 MeV proton beam in a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) zone obtained by a passive scattering system. Our findings indicate that the radiosensitization enhancement factor is 1.24 at 30% cell survival fraction, 8 days after 6 Gy proton beam irradiation. Since protons deposit the majority of their energy at the SOBP region and interact with GNPs to induce more ejected electrons from the high-Z GNPs, these ejected electrons then react with water molecules to produce excessive ROS that can damage cellular organelles. Laser scanning confocal microscopy reveals the excessive ROS induced inside the GNP-loaded cells immediately after proton irradiation. Furthermore, the damage to cytoskeletons and mitochondrial dysfunction in GNP-loaded cells caused by the induced ROS becomes significantly severe, 48 h after proton irradiation. Our biological evidence suggests that the cytotoxicity of GNP-enhanced ROS production has the potential to increase the tumoricidal efficacy of PBT.

Radiotherapy, PARP Inhibition, and Immune-Checkpoint Blockade: A Triad to Overcome the Double-Edged Effects of Each Single Player

Radiotherapy and, more recently, PARP inhibitors (PARPis) and immune-checkpoint inhibitors represent effective tools in cancer therapy. Radiotherapy exerts its effects not only by damaging DNA and inducing tumor cell death, but also stimulating anti-tumor immune responses. PARPis are known to exert their therapeutic effects by inhibiting DNA repair, and they may be used in combination with radiotherapy. Both radiotherapy and PARPis modulate inflammatory signals and stimulate type I IFN (IFN-I)-dependent immune activation. However, they can also support the development of an immunosuppressive tumor environment and upregulate PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. When provided as monotherapy, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (mainly antibodies to CTLA-4 and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis) result particularly effective only in immunogenic tumors. Combinations of immunotherapy with therapies that favor priming of the immune response to tumor-associated antigens are, therefore, suitable strategies. The widely explored association of radiotherapy and immunotherapy has confirmed this benefit for several cancers. Association with PARPis has also been investigated in clinical trials. Immunotherapy counteracts the immunosuppressive effects of radiotherapy and/or PARPis and synergies with their immunological effects, promoting and unleashing immune responses toward primary and metastatic lesions (abscopal effect). Here, we discuss the beneficial and counterproductive effects of each therapy and how they can synergize to overcome single-therapy limitations.

The 'stealth-bomber' paradigm for deciphering the tumour response to carbon-ion irradiation

Numerous studies have demonstrated the higher biological efficacy of carbon-ion irradiation (C-ions) and their ballistic precision compared with photons. At the nanometre scale, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by radiation and responsible for the indirect effects are differentially distributed according to the type of radiation. Photon irradiation induces a homogeneous ROS distribution, whereas ROS remain condensed in clusters in the C-ions tracks. Based on this linear energy transfer-dependent differential nanometric ROS distribution, we propose that the higher biological efficacy and specificities of the molecular response to C-ions rely on a 'stealth-bomber' effect. When biological targets are on the trajectories of the particles, the clustered radicals in the tracks are responsible for a 'bomber' effect. Furthermore, the low proportion of ROS outside the tracks is not able to trigger the cellular mechanisms of defence and proliferation. The ability of C-ions to deceive the cellular defence of the cancer cells is then categorised as a 'stealth' effect. This review aims to classify the biological arguments supporting the paradigm of the 'stealth-bomber' as responsible for the biological superiority of C-ions compared with photons. It also explains how and why C-ions will always be more efficient for treating patients with radioresistant cancers than conventional radiotherapy.

Are charged particles a good match for combination with immunotherapy? Current knowledge and perspectives

Charged particle radiotherapy, mainly using protons and carbon ions, provides physical characteristics allowing for a volume conformal irradiation and a reduction of the integral dose to normal tissue. Carbon ion therapy additionally features an increased biological effectiveness resulting in peculiar molecular effects. Immunotherapy, mostly performed with immune checkpoint inhibitors, is nowadays considered a pillar in cancer therapy. Based on the advantageous features of charged particle radiotherapy, we review pre-clinical evidence revealing a strong potential of its combination with immunotherapy. We argue that the combination therapy deserves further investigation with the aim of translation in clinics, where a few studies have been set up already.

Particle Therapy: Clinical Applications and Biological Effects

Particle therapy is a developing area of radiotherapy, mostly involving the use of protons, neutrons and carbon ions for cancer treatment. The reduction of side effects on healthy tissues in the peritumoral area is an important advantage of particle therapy. In this review, we analyze state-of-the-art particle therapy, as compared to conventional photon therapy, to identify clinical benefits and specify the mechanisms of action on tumor cells. Systematization of published data on particle therapy confirms its successful application in a wide range of cancers and reveals a variety of biological effects which manifest at the molecular level and produce the particle therapy-specific molecular signatures. Given the rapid progress in the field, the use of particle therapy holds great promise for the near future.