Medication adherence and fracture risk among patients on bisphosphonate therapy in a large United States health plan

Prediction of musculoskeletal pain after the first intravenous zoledronic acid injection in patients with primary osteoporosis: development and evaluation of a new nomogram

OBJECTIVE

To construct a new prediction nomogram to predict the risk of musculoskeletal pain in patients with primary osteoporosis who receive zoledronic acid intravenously for the first time.

METHOD

Clinical data of 368 patients with primary osteoporosis who received the first intravenous injection of zoledronic acid in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 were studied. Patients were divided into a musculoskeletal pain group (n = 258) and a non-musculoskeletal pain group (n = 110) based on the presence or absence of musculoskeletal pain 3 days after injection. Statistically significant predictors were screened by logistic regression analysis and the minimum absolute contraction and selection operator (LASSO) to construct a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the calibration curve, the C-index, and the decision curve analysis (DCA) and verified in a validation cohort.

RESULTS

The independent predictors of the nomogram were age, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, NSAIDs, prior Vitamin D intake, and BMI. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.980 (95% CI, 0.915-0.987), showing excellent predictive performance. The nomogram c index was 0.980, and the nomogram c index for internal verification remained high at 0.979. Moreover, calibration curves show that the nomogram has good consistency. Finally, the DCA showed that the net benefit of the nomogram was 0.20-0.49.

CONCLUSION

Musculoskeletal pain is a common symptom of APR in OP patients treated with intravenous zoledronic acid. Risk factors for musculoskeletal pain after zoledronic acid injection in OP patients were: non-use of NSAIDs, youth (<80 years old), serum 25 (OH) D<30ng /mL, no prior intake of vitamin D, BMI<24 kg /m2. A nomogram constructed from the above predictors can be used to predict musculoskeletal pain after the first zoledronic acid injection.

Impact of Medication Adherence on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review

Osteoporosis is a chronic, prevalent disease marked by decreased bone mass and changes in bone anatomy associated with significant morbidity. The management of osteoporosis necessitates long-term therapy for which patient adherence is of vital importance. In the present review, we aim to collect all potential evidence from relevant studies that reported the impact of medication adherence on bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. We have conducted both electronic and manual search strategies within the potential databases and included articles and reviews to find relevant studies. We have assessed the effects of osteoporotic medication adherence on fracture rates and bone mineral density. The study participants were divided into two groups, adherent and non-adherent. Studies from the year 2010-2023 were included. Final inclusion consisted of 14 studies that showed variation in adherence rates with only three studies reporting optimal adherence followed by two studies with nearly half adherent population while the rest of the studies reported low medication adherence. The highest adherence rate reported was 82% while the lowest was 8%. Among the included studies the fracture rates varied significantly. Decreased rates of fracture were observed in the adherent population however two of the included studies were contrary to these findings. Additionally, only three studies discussed the effect of adherence on bone mineral density. Lack of medication adherence is linked to an increased risk of fracture, and low bone mineral density, further associated with more severe complications as per the evidence from the literature. However, variation in the fracture rates as observed in our findings advocates the need for further research for the generalizability of results.

Divergent Patterns of Antifracture Medication Use Following Fracture on Therapy: A Population-Based Cohort Study

CONTEXT

Fracture on therapy should motivate better antifracture medication adherence.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe osteoporosis medication adherence in women before and following a fracture.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis of antifracture medication possession ratios (MPR) among women in the Manitoba BMD Registry (1996-2013) included menopausal women who started antifracture drug therapy after a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-BMD assessment with follow-up for 5 years during which a nontraumatic fracture occurred at least 1 year after starting treatment. Linked prescription records determined medication adherence (estimated by MPR) in 1-year intervals. The variable of interest was MPR in the year before and after the year in which the fracture occurred, with subgroup analyses according to duration of treatment pre-fracture. We chose an MPR of ≥ 0.50 to indicate minimum adherence needed for drug efficacy.

RESULTS

There were 585 women with fracture on therapy, 193 (33%) had hip or vertebral fracture. Bisphosphonates accounted for 82.2% of therapies. Median MPR the year prior to fracture was 0.89 (IQR, 0.49-1.0) and 0.69 (IQR, 0.07-0.96) the year following the year of fracture (P < 0.0001). The percentage of women with MPR ≥ 0.5 pre-fracture was 73.8%, dropping to 57.3% post-fracture (P < 0.0001); when restricted to hip/vertebral fracture, results were similar (58.2% to 33.3%; P < 0.002). Among those with pre-fracture MPR < 0.5, only 21.7% achieved a post-fracture MPR ≥ 0.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Although fracture on therapy may motivate sustained/improved adherence, MPR remains low or even declines after fracture in many. This could reflect natural decline in MPR with time but is paradoxical to expectations. Fracture on therapy represents an important opportunity for clinicians to reemphasize treatment adherence.

Protocol for the models of primary osteoporosis screening in men (MOPS) cluster randomized trial

Current guidelines recommend primary osteoporosis screening for at-risk men to reduce the morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with osteoporotic fractures. However, analyses in a national Veterans Health Administration cohort of over 4,000,000 men demonstrated that primary osteoporosis screening as it is currently operationalized does not benefit most older Veterans due to inefficient targeting and low subsequent treatment and adherence rates. The overall objective of this study is to determine whether a new model of primary osteoporosis screening reduces fracture risk compared to usual care. We are conducting a pragmatic group randomized trial of 38 primary care teams assigned to usual care or a Bone Health Service (BHS) screening model in which screening and adherence activities are managed by a centralized expert team. The study will: 1) compare the impact of the BHS model on patient-level outcomes strongly associated with fracture rates (eligible proportion screened, proportion meeting treatment criteria who receive osteoporosis medications, medication adherence, and femoral neck bone mineral density); 2) quantify the impact on provider and facility-level outcomes including change in DXA volume, change in metabolic bone disease clinic volume, and PACT provider time and satisfaction; and 3) estimate the impact on health system and policy outcomes using Markov models of screening program cost per quality adjusted life year based from health system and societal perspectives.

Effect of Dosing Interval on Compliance of Osteoporosis Patients on Bisphosphonate Therapy: Observational Study Using Nationwide Insurance Claims Data

Only a few studies are available on the effect of the dosing interval of bisphosphonate on drug compliance. We analyzed the data of patients who were newly prescribed bisphosphonate using a national insurance claims database. Drug compliance was assessed by calculating medication possession ratio (MPR) over a minimum of a 1-year follow-up. This analysis included 281,996 new bisphosphonate users with a mean age of 68.9 years (92% women). The patients were divided into daily, weekly, monthly, 3-monthly, and switch groups (who changed the drug to other dosing intervals). The average MPR was the highest in the switch group (66%), and the longer the dosing interval, the higher the compliance (3-monthly, 56% vs. daily, 37%). “Non-compliant” was defined as an MPR under 80%. Various factors which were possibly associated with “non-compliant” MPR were investigated using multiple regression analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that male patients were more likely to be non-compliant with pharmacotherapy than female patients, with as odds ratio of 1.389. Younger patients had a significantly lower likelihood of being non-compliant than older patients for age 60–69 vs. age 80+. Long dosing intervals were recommended to improve compliance and special attention was given to older and male patients.

Persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the Lille University Hospital Fracture Liaison Service

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION

A Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) was set up at Lille University Hospital in 2016. The purpose of this study was to assess persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the FLS over a period of 1 year, and to determine predictors of discontinuation.

METHODS

The study population comprised adults of both genders, aged 50 or over, admitted to Lille University Hospital between January 2016 and January 2019 for a low-trauma fracture and managed in our FLS. Outcomes included (1) persistence rate at 1 year after treatment initiation, (2) persistence rate at 2 years after treatment initiation, (3) persistence rate at 1 and 2 years after treatment initiation according to type of treatment, (4) predictors of non-persistence, and (5) reasons for discontinuing treatment over 1 year after initiation. Persistence was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In all, 1224 patients (≥50 years old) with a recent history of low-trauma fracture (≤12 months) were identified. Of these, 380 patients - 79.2% female; mean (SD) age 76 (11) years - were seen at the FLS. In those 380 patients, 410 fractures were found and 360 of them (87.8%) were major fractures, breaking down as follows: vertebra (44%), hip (19%), proximal humerus (10%), and pelvis (8%). Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed for 367 (96.6%) patients and 275 of them began the prescribed treatment. The following anti-osteoporosis drugs were prescribed: zoledronic acid (n=150, 54.5%), teriparatide (n=63, 22.9%), and denosumab (n=39, 14.2%). Oral bisphosphonates were prescribed for a few patients (n=23, 8.4%). Persistence with osteoporosis medication (any class) was estimated at 84.1% (95% CI: 79.1% to 88.1%) at 12-month follow-up, and dropped to 70.3% (95% CI: 63.7% to 75.9%) at 24 months. When drug-specific analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, persistence rates at 12 and 24 months were found to be higher with denosumab than with any other treatment. Independent predictors of non-persistence at 12 months were 'follow-up performed by a general practitioner (GP)' - Odds Ratio (OR) for GP vs. FLS = 3.68; 95% CI, 1.52 to 8.90, p=0.004 - and 'treatment with zoledronic acid' - OR for zoledronic acid vs. denosumab = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.21 to 9.50, p=0.019; OR for zoledronic acid vs. teriparatide = 8.86; 95% CI, 1.15 to 68.10, p=0.035.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of the success of our FLS in terms of long-term persistence with osteoporosis treatments. However, osteoporosis treatment initiation still needs to be improved.

Timing of anti-osteoporosis medications initiation after a hip fracture affects the risk of subsequent fracture: A nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The optimal time after hip fracture to start prophylactic anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) remains uncertain, especially in real-world practice. Therefore, we investigated how timing of AOMs initiation affects the risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, and what factors influence timing of AOMs prescription.

METHOD

Patients ≥50 years old with diagnostic codes indicating hospitalization for hip fracture (n = 77,930) were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database; 9986 who were prescribed AOMs ≤1 year after a newly-diagnosed hip fracture were grouped into those who started AOMs from: ≤14 days (very early); 15-84 days (early); 85-252 days (late); and 253-365 days (very late). Associations with fracture-related hospitalizations after an index fracture were analyzed using a multivariate, time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model, and between-group differences compared by log-rank testing. Factors influencing timing of AOMs initiation were elucidated using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Compared to AOMs initiation from 15 to 84 days, initiation after 252 days was associated with significantly increased risk of fracture-related hospitalization (HR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.29-2.89). Both sensitivity and pre-specified subgroup analyses yield similar results. Among patients with high adherence to AOMs, the increased risk of subsequent fracture-related hospitalization among very late users was profound (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.41-4.64).

CONCLUSION

Timing of AOMs initiation was significantly associated with age, index year, index hospital length of stay as well as the accreditation level and geographic region of index hospital. After adjusting factors associated with timing of AOMs initiation and patients' adherence, the anti-fracture benefit of AOMs still depends crucially on the timely initiation of AOMs.

Patient Perceptions and Preferences for Osteoporosis Treatment

PURPOSE

Despite the high prevalence, morbidity, and treatment costs for osteoporosis-related fractures, studies have shown that patients infrequently receive the recommended treatment for low bone density (LBD). This study investigated patient perceptions about evaluation, management, and willingness to pursue osteoporosis treatment to further elucidate potential barriers to LBD treatment.

METHODS

A survey was prospectively administered to patients over 50 years old addressing patient history of fragility fractures and osteoporosis evaluation and treatment, medication administration preferences, and willingness to start a new medication to treat or prevent future fragility fractures.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-five patients completed surveys (63.1% women, 36.9% men; mean age, 64.1 years). Patients reported the following: 50.8% had taken supplements or medication for LBD. Patients who had never taken LBD prescription medications were asked about their willingness to take these medications if physician-recommended. The mean response on a 0 to 10 scale was 7.3 ± 3.2, which was not significantly different between fracture or bone density subgroups. Several barriers to taking LBD medications were identified: 85.7% said no medical provider had prescribed them; 14.0% stated they already took too many medications; 10.4% were afraid of potential side effects; 4.3% had conflicting provider recommendations; and 1.8% cited financial concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients held a favorable opinion on taking LBD medications when prescribed. Although 29.8% of patients had an abnormal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) result, 85.7% of all patients reported that no medical provider had prescribed LBD medications. A sizeable gap remains between current practice and optimal osteoporosis education and management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Despite the large reported and increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with upper extremity fragility fractures, the rate of treatment for LBD remains suboptimal.

Development of quality measures for use of self-injectable biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: An integrated specialty pharmacy initiative

PURPOSE

The development of a tool to measure medication safety, therapeutic efficacy, and other quality outcomes in patients receiving self-injectable biologic therapy for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at a health-system specialty pharmacy is described.

SUMMARY

Through a collaborative initiative by pharmacists, gastro-enterologists, and representatives of a pharmacy benefit manager and a pharmaceutical company, a set of clinical and specialty pharmacy quality measures was developed. The clinical measures are intended for use in assessing patient safety, disease status, treatment efficacy, and healthcare resource utilization during 3 assessments (pre-treatment, on-treatment, and longitudinal). The specialty pharmacy measures can be used to assess medication adherence, medication persistence, specialty pharmacy accreditation, and patient satisfaction. The proposed quality measures provide a foundation for evaluating the quality of IBD care and improving patient outcomes within a health-system specialty pharmacy. Future efforts to validate and implement the tool in clinical practice are planned.

CONCLUSION

The proposed quality measures provide a foundation for future inquiry regarding the appropriateness and feasibility of integrating the measures into clinical care. Further work is needed to implement and validate these quality measures and determine their impact in optimizing health outcomes.

Long-term persistence in patients with osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice: 36-month non-interventional, observational study

Persistence rates over 36 months with denosumab in patients diagnosed with osteoporosis in a real-world setting were examined, along with baseline patient characteristics predictive of persistence. This study represents the longest observational period with denosumab persistence and shows higher persistence rates when compared to bisphosphonates.

INTRODUCTION

The study objective was to describe long-term persistence with denosumab among patients treated for osteoporosis in a real-world setting. We also sought to examine patient characteristics predictive of persistence. Lastly, this study attempted to place the results in context by conducting a literature review of published persistence data for denosumab.

METHODS

This retrospective, non-interventional study analyzed 1158 patients from a specialty community private practice to assess patient persistence with denosumab in routine care. Persistence was defined as receiving seven denosumab injections, using an 8-week permissible gap, over 36 months. Non-persistent patients were further investigated retrospectively to identify reasons for discontinuation, when available.

RESULTS

Demographic analysis showed a population of 1158 patients with mean age 68.4 years old and baseline T-score - 2.7; nearly half of which experienced a prior osteoporosis-related fracture. In a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, 36-month persistence overall was 50.7%. Net persistence, as defined by receiving seven injections in the allowable time frame, was 64.2% of the cohort. In a multivariate analysis, prior vertebral fractures and recent osteoporosis therapy were associated with higher persistence; age greater than 75 years was associated with non-persistence. Reasons for discontinuation were available in 91.6% of non-persistent patients and categorized to include the ten most common explanations.

CONCLUSION

This study to our knowledge represents the longest continuous observational period providing data on denosumab persistence in a real-world setting. The total persistence noted is quite robust when compared to bisphosphonates and is within the upper range of prior published studies of denosumab with shorter observation periods.

Hyperkalemia in Real-World Patients Under Continuous Medical Care in Japan

Introduction

An abnormal serum potassium (S-K) level is an important electrolyte disturbance. However, its relation to clinical outcomes in real-world patients, particularly hyperkalemia burden, is not extensively studied.

Methods

An observational retrospective cohort study using a Japanese hospital claims database was done (April 2008–September 2017; N = 1,022,087). Associations between index S-K level and 3-year survival were modeled using cubic spline regression. Cox regression model was applied to estimate the time to death according to different S-K levels. Prevalence, patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and management of patients with hyperkalemia from first episode were assessed.

Results

Hyperkalemia prevalence was 67.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.1–68.8) per 1000 and increased in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (227.9; 95% CI: 224.3–231.5), heart failure (134.0; 95% CI: 131.2–136.8), and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) use (142.2; 95% CI: 139.6–144.7). U-shaped associations between S-K level and 3-year survival were observed with nadir 4.0 mEq/l. The risk of death was increased at S-K 5.1–5.4 mEq with hazard ratio of 7.6 (95% CI: 7.2–8.0). The 3-year mortality rate in patients with CKD stages 3a, 3b, 4, and 5 with normokalemia were 1.51%, 3.93%, 10.86%, and 12.09%, whereas that in patients with CKD stage 3a at S-K 5.1–5.4, 5.5–5.9, and ≥6.0 mEq/l increased to 10.31%, 11.43%, and 22.64%, respectively. Despite treatment with loop diuretics (18.5%) and potassium binders (5.8%), >30% of patients had persistently high S-K (≥5.1 mEq/l).

Conclusion

This study provides real-world insight on hyperkalemia based on a large number of patients with various medical backgrounds.

Changes in bone mineral density (BMD): a longitudinal study of osteoporosis patients in the real-world setting

In clinical practice, the frequency of patients achieving improved T-scores and the expected change in bone mineral density (BMD) according to osteoporosis drugs is unknown. We found that osteoporosis medications infrequently achieve improved femoral neck T-scores over 1.2 years. BMD increases were more often seen with IV bisphosphonates and denosumab.

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency of osteoporosis patients achieving improvement in T-scores and quantify the change in bone mineral density (BMD) over time according to osteoporosis medication use.

METHODS

The study included all patients receiving clinical care at United Osteoporosis Centers, Gainesville, GA, 1995-2015, who had at least two measures of femoral neck BMD (N = 1232). We evaluated successive pairs of BMD tests to describe the distribution of transitions between T-score categories. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate %BMD change between successive pairs of BMD tests according to osteoporosis medication, adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, baseline BMD, previous fracture, and follow-up time.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) age was 68 (±10) years, and 90% of patients were women. Mean baseline T-score was - 2.04 (± 0.85). In total, 1232 patients had 4918 pairs of successive BMD tests, with a mean 1.2 years (± 0.9) between assessments. Frequency of transition to an improved T-score category was 41% when prior T-score ≤ - 3.5, and 15% when prior T-score - 1.99 to - 1.50. Most individuals (69%) remained in the same T-score category. BMD increased 0.54% (95% CI 0.23-0.85%) with IV bisphosphonates and 1.23% (95% CI 0.56-1.90%) with denosumab, whereas no significant change was seen with oral bisphosphonates, teriparatide, or raloxifene.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis patients are unlikely to improve femoral neck T-scores over 1.2 years. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal time to repeat BMD testing while receiving osteoporosis treatment and to determine whether fracture risk is reduced in patients who achieve target T-scores.

Impact of bisphosphonate compliance on the risk of osteoporotic fracture in France

Limited information is available on the impact of bisphosphonate compliance levels on fracture risk in osteoporosis patients in France. The results of this nested case-control, retrospective study suggest that fracture risk did not significantly change with bisphosphonate compliance levels, except for highly compliant patients.

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION

This was the first study conducted in France to evaluate the impact of compliance levels for bisphosphonates, the most frequently prescribed first-line anti-osteoporotic treatment, on fracture risk.

METHODS

This retrospective nested case-control study included patients ≥ 50 years old, who were recorded in a random sample of French claims data, did not die between 2006 and 2013, and received ≥ 1 reimbursement for anti-osteoporotic treatment between 2007 and 2013. Cases (patients hospitalised for osteoporosis-related fractures) were matched to 1-3 controls (patients hospitalised for other reasons). Patients hospitalised for fractures within 12 months preceding the first delivery of anti-osteoporotic treatment or during the first 24 months of follow-up were excluded. Bisphosphonate compliance during the 24 months preceding hospitalisation was calculated by the Continuous measure of Medication Acquisition version 7 (CMA7). We evaluated the impact of bisphosphonate compliance (CMA7 ≥ 80%) and very good compliance levels (CMA7 > 90%) on fracture risk.

RESULTS

In the main analysis, the mean CMA7 values during the 24 months preceding hospitalisation were 48.4% for the 434 cases and 51.3% for the 1123 age-matched controls. An adjusted conditional logistic regression showed no significant impact (odds ratio: 0.851 [95% confidence interval: 0.668, 1.084]) of bisphosphonate compliance on fracture occurrence. In the sensitivity analysis, including one randomly selected control per case and only controls with CMA7 values > 90%, occurrence of fractures was lower (odds ratio: 0.741 [95% confidence interval: 0.608, 0.903]) among the 119 controls.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study suggested that very high levels of compliance with bisphosphonates are necessary to induce significant decreases in fracture risk.

The impact of GI events on persistence and adherence to osteoporosis treatment: 3-, 6-, and 12-month findings in the MUSIC-OS study

The goal of this multinational, prospective, observational study was to examine the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) events and self-reported levels of medication adherence and persistence in postmenopausal women. A total of 73.9% of patients remained on their osteoporosis (OP) therapy at month 12, although the presence of a GI event at baseline, month 3, and month 6 significantly reduced month 12 persistence among new users. The odds of a month-12 ADEOS score ≥ 20 were significantly lower among patients who experienced a GI event between baseline and month 6. The occurrence of GI events was observed to be associated with a lower likelihood of patient adherence and persistence to OP medication.

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) events and self-reported adherence and persistence with initial osteoporosis (OP) therapy over the course of the first 12 months of treatment.

METHODS

The Medication Use Patterns, Treatment Satisfaction, and Inadequate Control of Osteoporosis Study was a multinational, prospective, observational study examining the impact of GI events on OP management in postmenopausal women. Information regarding GI events was collected at the time of enrollment and at months 3, 6, and 12 of follow-up. Patients reported GI events and medication persistence and completed the 12-item Adherence Evaluation of Osteoporosis treatment (ADEOS) questionnaire. Multivariate logistic and general linear models examined the association between GI events at various time points and persistence and adherence at month 12.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 2943 women; 22.8% were classified as new users of OP therapy and the remainder were considered experienced users. Across all patients, 68.1% reported GI events at baseline; by month 12, over 80% of subjects who completed follow-up reported at least one GI problem. The majority of patients (86.7%) were treated only with bisphosphonates at baseline. At month 12, 73.9% of patients remained on therapy; logistic regression revealed that those with GI problems by month 6 were significantly less likely to persist with treatment, after adjusting for other factors. The odds of a month 12 ADEOS score ≥ 20 (considered predictive of adherence) were significantly lower among patients who experienced a GI event between baseline and month 6.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of GI events was associated with a lower likelihood of patient adherence to and persistence with OP medication.

Defining an Optimal Adherence Threshold for Patients Taking Subcutaneous Anti-TNFs for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

OBJECTIVES

In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using biological therapy, non-adherence leads to anti-drug antibody formation and reduced effectiveness. Little is known about the optimal level of adherence in IBD patients on biologic therapy. We aimed to identify the association between adherence and disease flare and determine an optimal level of adherence.

METHODS

We analyzed claims data for IBD patients prescribed adalimumab (ADA) and certolizumab (CZP) from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database from 2009 to 2013. Adherence was calculated using the medication possession ratio (MPR) from initiation until flare occurrence. A disease flare was defined as any hospitalization or new steroid prescription>90-days after drug initiation. The optimal MPR was determined using log-rank testing. The association between the optimal MPR and flare was assessed using multivariable Cox-Proportional hazards ratio.

RESULTS

There were 6,048 patients who were prescribed ADA (n=5,325) or CZP (n=723) for IBD. The average age was 41 years (±15) and 54% were female. The optimal MPR identified was 0.86 for ADA and 0.87 for CZP; 24% of the patients were below this level. Adjusting for age, gender, and concomitant medications at initiation, patients who were adherent above these levels had a 25% lower risk of flare for ADA (HR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.67-0.83, P<0.01) and 41% lower risk for CZP (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.46-0.76, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who delay refills >2 days on average every 2 weeks of their subcutaneous biologics have significantly increased risk of flare. Further studies to improve adherence among those patients who consistently delay medication use are necessary.

Bone loss after oophorectomy among high-risk women: an NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVE

Women undergoing premenopausal oophorectomy for a variety of reasons, including to reduce ovarian or breast cancer risk were evaluated for accelerated bone loss.

METHODS

The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-0215 randomized phase-II trial of zoledronic acid was initiated to determine if postoophorectomy bisphosphonate therapy could prevent this bone loss. The study was closed after slow accrual prevented evaluation of the primary study endpoint. We analyzed changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among the 80 women randomized to the observation arm of this study, as measured 3, 9, and 18 months postenrollment.

RESULTS

The mean change in BMD from baseline to 18 months was -0.09 (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.07), -0.05 (95% CI, -0.07 to -0.03), and -0.06 (95% CI, -0.07 to -0.05) g/cm across the lumbar spine, right hip, and left hip, respectively. This represents a BMD decrease of -8.5% for the lumbar spine and -5.7% for both the right and left hips from baseline to 18 months' observation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that premenopausal women undergoing oophorectomy clearly experience bone loss, an adverse effect of oophorectomy, which requires attention and active management. BMD should be monitored postoophorectomy, and treated per standard practice guidelines. Future studies will be required to determine if early treatment can mitigate fracture risk, and to test promising therapeutic interventions and novel prevention strategies, such as increased physical activity or alternative medications, in randomized trials.

Two-year persistence and compliance with osteoporosis therapies among postmenopausal women in a commercially insured population in the United States

This retrospective, observational study assessed 2-year persistence and compliance by treatment, route of administration, and dosing frequency in postmenopausal women initiating a new osteoporosis therapy. Two-year persistence and compliance rates were higher in women receiving injectables compared with oral agents.

PURPOSE

This study extends previous studies limited to 1-year follow-up by examining persistence with osteoporosis therapies over a 2-year period and compares short- and long-term trends in persistence and compliance among postmenopausal women with commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance in the USA.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study enrolled women ≥50 years newly initiating osteoporosis therapy between January 1 and December 31, 2012 (i.e., the index date), with continuous enrollment ≥14 months before and ≥24 months after their index date. Persistence (continuous therapy without a >60-day gap) and compliance with the index therapy were evaluated at 2 years of follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the odds of persistence and compliance across treatment and dosing regimens.

RESULTS

This study included 43,543 patients with mean (standard deviation) age 65 (10) years. At 2 years of follow-up, persistence and compliance were higher for patients treated with injectable agents (ranging from 34 to 41%, excluding an every-3-month injection) than those treated with oral agents (ranging from 20 to 31%). Additionally, patients initiating oral bisphosphonates (except risedronate once daily), raloxifene (daily), or zoledronic acid (annually) had significantly lower odds of persistence compared with denosumab (every 6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initiating injectable therapies had greater persistence and compliance at 2 years than those initiating oral therapies. Patients initiating an every-6-month injection had significantly higher persistence compared with those initiating more frequently dosed (e.g., daily and weekly) oral or injectable agents.

Predicting Adherence and Persistence with Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System

BACKGROUND

Examining drug exposure is essential to pharmacovigilance, especially for bisphosphonate (BP) therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in 4 measures of oral BP exposure: treatment discontinuation, adherence, persistence, and nonpersistence.

METHODS

Among women aged ≥ 50 years who initiated oral BP therapy during 2002-2007 with at least 3 years of health plan membership follow-up, discontinuation was defined by evidence of no further treatment during the study observation period. Among those with at least 2 filled BP prescriptions during the study period, adherence was calculated for each year of follow-up using the (modified) proportion of days covered (mPDC) metric that allows for stockpiling of prescription/refills overlap ≤ 30 days supply. Persistence was quantified by treatment duration, allowing a gap of up to 60 days between prescription/refill days covered. Nonpersistence was quantified by the periods without drugs outside this allowable gap. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare age and race groups and the relationships of early adherence (adherence during the first year) with subsequent adherence.

RESULTS

Among 48,390 women initiating oral BP therapy and followed for 3 years, 26.7% discontinued in year 1, and 14.7% of the remaining 35,456 women discontinued in year 2. Discontinuation rates were slightly higher (29.4%, P < 0.001) for women aged ≥ 75 years and somewhat lower (21.1%, P < 0.001) for Asian women. During the first year, 60.4% of the women achieved an mPDC of ≥ 75%, with demographic differences in adherence similar to that seen for treatment discontinuation. Over the 3 years, the median mPDC levels for BP therapy were 86%, 84%, and 85% in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively, for those receiving treatment. Cumulative persistence was 2.3 years (median, IQR = 1.0-3.0) overall and slightly greater for Asian versus white women and lower for older women. There were 18,174 (42.9%) women with at least 1 period of nonpersistence during 3 years follow-up in excess of the 60-day allowable gap between prescription/refills (median cumulative nonpersistence = 0.65, IQR = 0.30-1.25 years). Women with mPDC ≥ 75% during the first year had a 12-fold and 6-fold increased odds of mPDC ≥ 75% during year 2 and year 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BP discontinuation rates are highest for women during the first year. Among those continuing treatment in subsequent years, adherence rates were relatively stable. Persistence and adherence varied slightly by age and was somewhat higher in Asians, contributing to differences in cumulative BP exposure. We also found evidence that optimal adherence in the first year was highly predictive of optimal adherence in the subsequent 1-2 years. Hence, subgroups of patients receiving oral BP drugs may require different levels of support and monitoring to maximize treatment benefit, especially based on early patterns of use.

DISCLOSURES

This study was supported by grants from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Benefit Program and the National Institutes of Health, 1R01AG047230-01A1. The opinions expressed in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of Kaiser Permanente or the National Institutes of Health. Hui, Yi, and Chandra have received past research funding from Amgen not related to the current study. Adams has received research funding from Amgen, Merck, and Otsuka not related to the current study. Niu has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb not related to the current study. Ettinger has received past legal fees in litigation involving Fosamax. Lo has received past research funding from Amgen and current research funding from Sanofi not related to the current study. The data from this study were presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 19-22, 2016; San Francisco, California. Study concept and design were contributed primarily by Hui and Lo, along with Adams, Niu, Yi, and Ettinger. Hui took the lead in data collection, along with Chandra, and data interpretation was performed by Niu, Yi, and Lo, along with the other authors. The manuscript was written by Hui, Adams, and Lo, along with Niu, Yi, and Ettinger, and revised by Ettinger, Hui, Lo, and Niu, along with the other authors.

Bisphosphonate Use and the Risk of Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoporotic Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The use of bisphosphonates has been reported to have potential beneficial effects on knee osteoarthritis, but existing studies have limitations. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of bisphosphonate use with the risk of undergoing total knee arthroplasty and with the consumption of pain medication among osteoporotic patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We identified patients who were newly diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis among a cohort of patients with osteoporosis from 2009 to 2012 in the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We further categorized these patients into 2 groups: those who were treated with bisphosphonates (bisphosphonate users) and those who were not treated with any anti-osteoporosis drug (nonusers). Bisphosphonate treatment adherence was calculated by the medication possession ratio (MPR) as the proportion of days of bisphosphonate treatment within a fixed duration; an MPR of ≥80% was considered high adherence. The primary and secondary outcomes of interest were undergoing total knee arthroplasty and the use of pain medication, respectively. Analyses using Cox proportional hazard models with propensity-score adjustment were performed to estimate the association between bisphosphonate use and the risk of undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The incremental change in the mean accumulated defined daily doses of pain medications among both bisphosphonate users and nonusers was calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 16,276 bisphosphonate users and 123,791 nonusers of any anti-osteoporosis drug among the patients with osteoporosis who were newly diagnosed with osteoarthritis. Bisphosphonate use was significantly associated with a decreased risk of total knee arthroplasty (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.83; p < 0.001). In patients with a follow-up period of ≥24 months and an MPR of ≥80%, the effect size was significantly greater (adjusted HR, 0.66; p = 0.048). Over the 5 years of follow-up, we found a significantly greater decrease in the use of pain medication among bisphosphonate users than among nonusers (p < 0.001; Chow test).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, bisphosphonate use was associated with a significantly lower risk of total knee arthroplasty, especially in patients with high adherence and longer treatment duration. A lower consumption of pain medication was also found for bisphosphonate users among the patients with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of single-dose dexamethasone on acute phase response following zoledronic acid: a randomized controlled trial

Zoledronic acid provokes an inflammatory reaction, or acute phase response, in some individuals. We examined whether treatment with dexamethasone could prevent this response. A single dose of dexamethasone 4 mg, given at the time of zoledronic acid infusion, did not influence the incidence or severity of the acute phase response.

INTRODUCTION

The potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZOL) is used to treat osteoporosis, Paget's disease, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. This medication can provoke an inflammatory reaction, known as the acute phase response (APR). We examined whether glucocorticoid treatment at the time of first exposure to ZOL prevents the development of APR.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, controlled trial assessed 40 adults receiving ZOL 5 mg intravenously for the first time. Participants received oral dexamethasone 4 mg (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) at the time of ZOL infusion. Oral temperature was measured at baseline and three times a day for 3 days following infusion. Symptoms of APR were assessed via questionnaire at baseline then daily for 3 days and again at day 15 post-infusion. Use of rescue medications (paracetamol or ibuprofen) in the 3 days following infusion was evaluated. Primary outcome was between-group difference in temperature change from baseline.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in temperature change (p = 0.95) or symptom score (p = 0.42) in the 3 days following ZOL between dexamethasone and placebo recipients. Eleven (55%) in the dexamethasone group and 10 (50%) placebo recipients experienced a temperature increase of ≥1 °C (p = 0.99). Seven (35%) in the dexamethasone group and 9 (45%) in the placebo group experienced an increase in symptom score of ≥3 points (p = 0.75). Thirteen (65%) dexamethasone recipients and 12 (60%) in the placebo group required rescue medications (p = 0.99). Dexamethasone was well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of dexamethasone 4 mg does not influence the incidence or severity of APR following first exposure to ZOL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12615000794505.

Factors associated with high 24-month persistence with denosumab: results of a real-world, non-interventional study of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is vital for fracture prevention. This non-interventional study of postmenopausal women receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium found that persistence with denosumab remains consistently high after 24 months in patients at high risk of fracture.

PURPOSE

Continued persistence with osteoporosis therapy is vital for fracture prevention. This non-interventional study of clinical practice evaluated medication-taking behavior of postmenopausal women receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium and factors influencing persistence.

METHODS

Subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) was assigned according to prescribing information and local guidelines before and independently of enrollment; outcomes were recorded during routine practice for up to 24 months. Persistence was defined as receiving the subsequent injection within 6 months + 8 weeks of the previous injection and adherence as administration of subsequent injections within 6 months ± 4 weeks of the previous injection. Medication coverage ratio (MCR) was calculated as the proportion of time a patient was covered by denosumab. Associations between pre-specified baseline covariates and 24-month persistence were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The 24-month analyses included 1479 women (mean age 66.3-72.5 years) from 140 sites; persistence with denosumab was 75.1-86.0%, adherence 62.9-70.1%, and mean MCR 87.4-92.4%. No covariate had a significant effect on persistence across all four countries. For three countries, a recent fall decreased persistence; patients were generally older with chronic medical conditions. In some countries, other covariates (e.g., older age, comorbidity, immobility, and prescribing reasons) decreased persistence. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 2.3-6.9% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four-month persistence with denosumab is consistently high among postmenopausal women in Europe and may be influenced by patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to identify determinants of low persistence.

Persistence with denosumab and zoledronic acid among older women: a population-based cohort study

Persistence to denosumab or zoledronic acid was increased compared to oral bisphosphonates.

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab and zoledronic acid are alternative therapies to oral bisphosphonates. Few studies have assessed persistence of those agents.

METHODS

Incident users of denosumab and zoledronic acid were identified using healthcare databases of public drug insurance plan of Quebec province, Canada. Patients initiating therapy between October 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013, and aged 50 years and over were eligible. A persistence rate was assessed over a 2-year period. We assess the proportion of patients receiving the second, third, and fourth injections within a specific delay of predicted time of renewal of both agents. The predictors of non-persistence were analyzed using a Cox regression model only among women.

RESULTS

Among 12,689 incident users, 97.2 % were women. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a slow decline of persistence after initiating zoledronic acid compared to denosumab therapy, dropping to 81.6 and 63.3 % after 1 and 2 years of follow-up using the permissive gaps of 56 days, in contrast to zoledronic acid, where persistence rate still stays at 74.8 % after 2 years of follow-up using the permissive gap of 112 days. The likelihood of non-persistence was significantly higher among new users of denosumab and zoledronic acid among older patients and year of initiation; but depression and diabetes are only predictors of non-persistence among the zoledronic group. Concomitant use of calcium and vitamin D supplements was at low level which may compromise the clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The persistence rate to denosumab and zoledronic acid was higher to the published data of oral bisphosphonates. The second intention of treatment seems to target more severe patients which may more likely to be compliant.

High rate of non-treatment among osteoporotic women enrolled in a US Medicare plan

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the rate of non-treatment among elderly women with osteoporosis (OP) and to examine the association between patient characteristics and receiving treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study utilized patient information and claims from the Humana database to identify Medicare covered women aged ≥65 years old and continuously enrolled with evidence of either an OP diagnosis or an OP-related fracture during 2007-2011. The main outcome was receipt of pharmacological treatment of OP during 2012 (follow-up). The percentage of non-treatment was calculated and a stepwise selection logistic regression model was employed to estimate the association between baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and receiving treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 109,829 patients were included. Mean age was 75.7 years and 79.4% were identified with OP through OP diagnosis codes and did not have evidence of a prior fracture. Approximately one-third (32%) of patients had used OP medications during the baseline period, and 39% had experienced at least one gastro-intestinal event during baseline. Among all patients, 71.4% did not receive OP therapy during follow-up. The strongest factor associated with receiving treatment was prior use of OP therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 31.3; p < .001). Among the subgroup of patients with baseline fractures, 75.9% did not receive OP therapy during follow-up and the strongest factor associated with receiving treatment remained prior use of OP therapy (OR = 20.4; p < .001). Those with high comorbidity burden were less likely to receive treatment in both the overall cohort and within the subgroup with baseline fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Medicare-eligible women aged ≥65 identified with OP between 2007 and 2011, 71.4% did not receive OP treatment during 2012, including 75.9% of the subgroup of patients with a prior fracture. The use of diagnosis and procedures codes to identify patients with osteoporosis is subject to variation in coding.

GRAND-4: the German retrospective analysis of long-term persistence in women with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates or denosumab

This retrospective database study assessed 2-year persistence with bisphosphonates or denosumab in a large German cohort of women with a first-time prescription for osteoporosis treatment. Compared with intravenous or oral bisphosphonates, 2-year persistence was 1.5-2 times higher and risk of discontinuation was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) with denosumab.

INTRODUCTION

Persistence with osteoporosis therapies is critical for fracture risk reduction. Detailed data on long-term persistence (≥2 years) with bisphosphonates and denosumab are sparse.

METHODS

From the German IMS® database, we included women aged 40 years or older with a first-time prescription for bisphosphonates or denosumab between July 2010 and August 2014; patients were followed up until December 2014. The main outcome was treatment discontinuation, with a 60-day permissible gap between filled prescriptions. Two-year persistence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with treatment discontinuation as the failure event. Denosumab was compared with intravenous (i.v.) and oral bisphosphonates separately. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) for the 2-year risk of discontinuation were calculated, with adjustment for age, physician specialty, health insurance status, and previous medication use.

RESULTS

Two-year persistence with denosumab was significantly higher than with i.v. or oral bisphosphonates (39.8 % [n = 21,154] vs 20.9 % [i.v. ibandronate; n = 20,472] and 24.8 % [i.v. zoledronic acid; n = 3966] and 16.7-17.5 % [oral bisphosphonates; n = 114,401]; all P < 0.001). Patients receiving i.v. ibandronate, i.v. zoledronic acid, or oral bisphosphonates had a significantly increased risk of treatment discontinuation than did those receiving denosumab (HR = 1.65, 1.28, and 1.96-2.02, respectively; all P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year persistence with denosumab was 1.5-2 times higher than with i.v. or oral bisphosphonates, and risk of discontinuation was significantly lower with denosumab than with bisphosphonates. A more detailed understanding of factors affecting medication-taking behavior may improve persistence and thereby reduce rates of fracture.

Persistance and Compliance with Osteroporosis Therapies Among Women in a Commercially Insured Population in the United States

BACKGROUND

Prior research has shown that rates of persistence and compliance with osteoporosis therapies are associated with significantly fewer vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. A number of studies have examined medication-taking behavior with oral bisphosphonates and teriparatide, and these 1-year persistence rates have ranged from 39.9% to 56.7%. Limited real-world data are available regarding persistence and compliance rates with newer therapies such as denosumab, a RANK ligand inhibitor administered every 6 months as a subcutaneous injection. 

OBJECTIVE

To assess persistence and compliance rates over 1 year with newly initiated osteoporosis therapies, including denosumab, alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, raloxifene, and teriparatide, within a cohort of commercially insured women. 

METHODS

Health insurance claims data derived from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits databases (2010-2013) were used to conduct this retrospective cohort study. Adult females aged 18 years and older newly initiated on denosumab, raloxifene, teriparatide, or oral bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, or risedronate) between January 1, 2012, and March 31, 2012, were identified for inclusion. The date of the first qualifying osteoporosis prescription claim was defined as the index date. Patients were required to have at least 24 months of pre-index and at least 12 months of post-index continuous enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefits. Outcomes of patients initiating zoledronic acid (administered intravenously once yearly) were not assessed because a 12-month follow-up period would be insufficient for tracking persistence and compliance for this medication. Patients with Paget's disease of the bone, osteogenesis imperfecta, hypercalcemia, malignant cancer and metastasis, human immunodeficiency virus, and patients receiving preventive treatment for risk of breast cancer or denosumab in the pre-index period were excluded from the study. A subcohort of women aged 50 years and older at high risk for fracture (indicated by 1 or more of the following: aged ≥ 70 years, a pre-index fracture, or pre-index use of osteoporosis therapy that was discontinued at least 3 months prior to index) was analyzed separately. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Persistence, indicated by continuous use of the index therapy without a gap of 60 days or more; medication coverage ratio (MCR), the proportion of days covered by the index therapy; and compliance, defined as an MCR ≥ 0.80, were assessed during the 12-month follow-up. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of persistence and compliance for the treatment groups of interest.

RESULTS

10,863 female patients newly initiating osteoporosis medications (mean [SD] age: 66.2 [11.5] years) were identified. In the pre-index period, 35.8% of patients had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, while 11.5% had a diagnosis of osteopenia. Pre-index osteoporosis treatment was identified in 29.1% of patients, and 13.6% had an osteoporosis-related fracture in the pre-index period. Propensity score weight-adjusted 12-month persistence with the index medication varied from 28.9% to 35.1% for oral bisphosphonate users, 42.0% for raloxifene users, 59.1% for teriparatide users, and 68.3% for denosumab users (P  less than  0.0001). The adjusted mean [SD] MCR was highest among patients treated with denosumab (0.83 [0.21]), followed by teriparatide (0.67 [0.31]), raloxifene, (0.57 [0.34]), ibandronate (0.54 [0.32]), alendronate (0.51 [0.33]), and risedronate (0.46 [0.33]; P  less than  0.0001). The odds of being persistent and compliant across treatments favored denosumab (OR = 1.59 to 5.56, P  less than  0.05 for persistence; OR =  2.44 to 7.69, P  less than  0.0001 for compliance). Results were similar in the subcohort of women aged 50 years and older at high risk for fracture (n = 6,187; mean [SD] age: 71.9 [10.9] years). The odds of being persistent and compliant across treatments also favored denosumab (OR = 1.62 to 5.75, P  less than  0.0001 for persistence; OR = 2.36 to 7.25, P  less than  0.0001 for compliance).

CONCLUSIONS

In a U.S. setting, rates of persistence and compliance over 12 months were higher among women initiating denosumab compared with those initiating other osteoporosis therapies.

Rates and reasons for lack of persistence with anti-osteoporotic drugs: analysis of the Campania region database

Subjects with chronic diseases are more likely to be nonpersistent to pharmacological treatment. Lack of persistence is common among subjects using oral anti-osteoporotic drugs, and leads to increased risk of fragility fracture. The aim of our retrospective study is to analyze the rates and reasons for discontinuation of anti-osteoporotic drugs in the Campania Region. Subjects aged over 40 years were included if they had received at least one prescription for any anti-osteoporotic drugs. Data were obtained from an administrative database of regional data on outpatient drug prescriptions reimbursed by the National Health Service. Patients were followed until the discontinuation of anti-osteoporotic therapy or until the end of the observation period. A total of 30,048 were incident users of anti-osteoporotic drugs: 28,317 (94.2%) females. The mean age of the cohort was 69.0±10.0 years. Weekly bis-phosphonates (51.1%) were the most commonly prescribed drugs. In the overall population, persistence rates were 34.8% after 6 months and 13.4% at one year. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that daily regimen (HR 1.9) treatments remained at higher risk of early discontinuation compared to weekly regimen therapies. Our data showed that the persistence to osteoporosis therapy is significantly worse than reported in literature.

The Association Between Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use and the Risk of Fracture Among Women Aged 50 or Older with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a prevalent disease, and bisphosphonates can effectively reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, the association between the length of the medication treatment and the risk of fractures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between long-term bisphosphonate use (treatment duration ≥5 years) and the risk of fractures among women with osteoporosis aged 50 or older.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study by using the 2001-2011 National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We included women who were 50 years or older, who had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, and who were newly initiating oral bisphosphonates between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003. The index date was the date of the first dispensing of oral bisphosphonate during the enrollment period. Women were considered to be using bisphosphonates until they had a gap in supply of more than 3 months. We classified bisphosphonate use as long term (≥5 years) and regular (<5 years) based on its length of use. The dependent variable was the time to the first observed clinical fracture. Cox-proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the association between long-term bisphosphonate use and the risk of fractures.

RESULTS

The study included 1342 women with a mean age of 71 years. Of them, 83 (6.2%) were long-term bisphosphonate users. A total of 185 (13.8%) had a fracture. After adjustments, long-term bisphosphonate use was not associated with a lower risk of fractures than was regular bisphosphonate use (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.91-2.45).

CONCLUSION

This study found no evidence of a lower risk of fractures to be associated with long-term bisphosphonate use among women aged 50 or older with osteoporosis in Taiwan. Orthopedists as well as other healthcare providers should be aware of the limited benefits of long-term bisphosphonate use.

Non-adherence with bisphosphonates among patients with osteoporosis: impact on fracture risk and healthcare cost‏

Osteoporosis-related fractures at the spine and hip have a substantial impact on mortality, morbidity, and quality of life in older adults worldwide. Adherence to bisphosphonates is essential for effective treatment and fracture prevention. Nevertheless, numerous studies from various populations and study designs clearly indicated that adherence and persistence are poor with more than 50% of patients discontinuing therapy within one year. This is primarily explained by mild adverse effects, dosing regimens, and costs. Studies have also shown that good adherence is associated with reduced osteoporosis-related and non-related healthcare costs as soon as 2 years from therapy initiation. Nonetheless, we found only little improvement in adherence rates over the years. In light of the importance of medication adherence and the limited success of previous programs, other than reducing dosing frequency, new directions should be explored to engage patients and care givers in order to improve adherence and prevent fractures.

Gastrointestinal symptoms and association with medication use patterns, adherence, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, and resource use in osteoporosis: baseline results of the MUSIC-OS study

SUMMARY

The Medication Use Patterns, Treatment Satisfaction, and Inadequate Control of Osteoporosis Study (MUSIC-OS) is a prospective, observational study of women with osteoporosis in Europe and Canada. At baseline, patients with gastrointestinal symptoms reported lower adherence to osteoporosis treatment, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life, than those without gastrointestinal symptoms.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to examine gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and the association between GI symptoms and treatment adherence, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among osteoporotic women in Europe and Canada.

METHODS

Baseline results are reported here for a prospective study which enrolled postmenopausal, osteoporotic women who were initiating (new users) or continuing (experienced users) osteoporosis treatment at study entry (baseline). A patient survey was administered at baseline and included the occurrence of GI symptoms during 6-month pre-enrolment, treatment adherence (adherence evaluation of osteoporosis (ADEOS), score 0-22), treatment satisfaction (Osteoporosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications (OPSAT-Q), score 0-100) and HRQoL (EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) utility, score 0-1; OPAQ-SV, score 0-100). The association between GI symptoms and ADEOS (experienced users), OPSAT-Q (experienced users), and HRQoL (new and experienced users) was assessed by general linear models adjusted for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 2959 patients (2275 experienced and 684 new users) were included. Overall, 68.1% of patients experienced GI symptoms in the past 6 months. Compared with patients without GI symptoms, patients with GI symptoms had lower mean baseline scores on most measures. The mean adjusted differences were ADEOS, -0.43; OPSAT-Q, -5.68; EQ-5D, -0.04 (new users) and -0.06 (experienced users), all P < 0.01. GI symptoms were also associated with lower OPAQ-SV domain scores: physical function, -4.17 (experienced users); emotional status, -4.28 (new users) and -5.68 (experienced users); back pain, -5.82 (new users) and -11.33 (experienced users), all P < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GI symptoms have lower treatment adherence and treatment satisfaction and worse HRQoL than patients without GI symptoms.

Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis

The objectives of this study were to estimate persistence with denosumab and put these results in context by conducting a review of persistence with oral bisphosphonates. Persistence with denosumab was found to be higher than with oral bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

This study had two objectives: to analyse persistence in Swedish women initiating denosumab for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and to put these findings in context by conducting a literature review and meta-analysis of persistence data for oral bisphosphonates.

METHODS

The study used the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and included women aged at least 50 years initiating denosumab between May 2010 and July 2012. One injection of denosumab was defined as 6-month persistence. Women were considered persistent for another 6 months if they filled their next prescription within 6 months + 56 days and survival analysis applied to the data. A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify retrospective studies of persistence with oral bisphosphonates and pooled persistence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The study identified 2,315 women who were incident denosumab users. Mean age was 74 years and 61% had been previously treated for PMO. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with denosumab was 83% (95% CI, 81-84%) and 62% (95% CI, 60-65%), respectively. The literature search identified 40 articles for inclusion in the meta-analysis. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with oral bisphosphonates ranged from 10% to 78% and from 16% to 46%, with pooled estimates of 45% and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and literature review suggest that persistence was higher with denosumab than with oral bisphosphonates.

Association between gastrointestinal events and persistence with osteoporosis therapy: analysis of administrative claims of a U.S. managed care population

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of patients do not persist with osteoporosis (OP) therapy. Gastrointestinal (GI) events (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux disease and nausea/vomiting) are common among OP patients receiving OP therapy and may impact persistence with treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of GI events and persistence with OP therapy.

METHODS

Using a large U.S. administrative claims database, we studied women aged ≥ 55 years who received oral bisphosphonate (BIS) as their first OP therapy from 2002-2009. The index date was the first pharmacy claim date recorded for oral BIS therapy; the baseline period was 12 months pre-index, and follow-up was 12 months post-index. Patients were considered persistent with therapy if they had continuous refills of the index drug class without additional drug therapy from a different drug class from the index date until the end of the follow-up period with no gaps in supply greater than 45 days. Discontinuation was defined as the first gap greater than 45 days during which there was no evidence of refills of OP medication. The association between post-treatment GI events and the risk of discontinuation or switching was modeled with Cox regression stratified by presence of baseline GI events and adjusted for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 75,593 women who met eligibility criteria, 59.9% discontinued BIS; 39.3% were persistent; and 0.5% switched to non-BIS. GI events were diagnosed in 20,073 patients (26.6%) during baseline and in 21,142 (28.0%) in the post-treatment period (12-month follow-up post-index). Patients with post-treatment GI diagnosis were 35.6% more likely to discontinue or switch treatment (HR = 1.356, 95% CI = 1.318-1.396) during the 12-month follow-up compared with those without post-treatment GI diagnosis. GI events that occurred closer to treatment discontinuation or switching were associated with a greater risk of discontinuation or switching: 37.9% (HR = 1.379, 95% CI = 1.338-1.421) for GI events within 6 months of discontinuation or switching and 45.6% (HR = 1.456, 95% CI = 1.408-1.505) for GI events within 3 months of discontinuation or switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women aged 55 years or older in a U.S. managed care population, post-treatment GI events were associated with a higher risk of discontinuation of oral BIS or switching to non-BIS.

Cost and consequences of noncompliance with osteoporosis treatment among women initiating therapy

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate compliance with osteoporosis (OP) treatments and determine the fracture and healthcare burden associated with noncompliance.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of a US claims database identified women initiating an OP medication from 1 January 2002 to 30 June 2009. Patients were ≥55 years and had ≥1 pharmacy claim for a bisphosphonate or non-bisphosphonate (raloxifene, calcitonin, teriparatide); the index date was the first pharmacy claim. There were three study periods: baseline (12 months pre-index); compliance period (0-12 months post-index); and follow-up period (12-24 months post-index). Medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated during the compliance period to differentiate two cohorts: compliant (MPR ≥ 80%) and noncompliant (MPR < 80%). Outcomes during follow-up were modeled by logistic regression (presence of fracture), Poisson regression (healthcare utilization incidence rate) and gamma regression (healthcare costs), all adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 685,505 women initiating OP therapy were identified and 57,913 (8.4%) met the inclusion criteria: only 23,430 (40.5%) were compliant and 34,483 (59.5%) were noncompliant. Mean age was 64 years. Noncompliance was associated with a 20% higher risk of any fracture (odds ratio: 1.20, 95% CI = 1.07-1.35), a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for inpatient utilization (IRR: 1.26, 95% CI = 1.19-1.34) and a lower rate of outpatient utilization (IRR: 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.98). Noncompliant patients had 13% higher medical costs (cost ratio: 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06-1.21) than compliant patients.

LIMITATIONS

Inclusion in this study required 36 months of continuous healthcare coverage. Thus, the results are primarily applicable to a stable, managed care population and may not be generalizable to other populations.

CONCLUSION

Noncompliance with OP therapy was associated with a higher risk of fracture, higher all-cause medical costs and a higher frequency of inpatient service utilization. Additional research is needed to identify barriers to compliance with OP therapy.

Osteoporotic fracture rate among women with at least 1 year of adherence to osteoporosis treatment

PURPOSE

In clinical trials, bisphosphonate therapy reduces but does not eliminate the risk of fracture. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to examine fracture rates among women who were adherent to bisphosphonate therapy for at least 1 year.

METHODS

We studied outcomes for women ≥50 years old who received their first osteoporosis therapy as an oral bisphosphonate during 2002-2008 and were enrolled in a large claims database for ≥3 consecutive years, including a baseline year before and 2 years after the index prescription (thus, the full study period was 2001-2010). Adherence during the first year of therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% (total number of days' supply/365 days × 100%).

RESULTS

Of the 62,446 women who met the eligibility criteria, 26,852 (43%) had an MPR ≥80% for osteoporosis therapy during year 1. In year 2, the fracture rate was 52/1000 patient-years. Fragility fractures were recorded for 1292 patients (4.8%) during the baseline year (before initiating therapy); for 1051 patients (3.9%) during year 1 (adherence year); and for 871 patients (3.2%) during year 2. Significant predictors of fracture in year 2 were older age, higher comorbidity score, comorbid inflammatory joint disease, and prior fragility fracture during the baseline year or first year of treatment. The primary limitation of these results is the scope of the claims database, which did not provide information on bone mineral density, supplemental use of calcium or vitamin D, or reasons for initiating oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being adherent to bisphosphonate treatment for 1 year, 3.2% of women experienced a fracture in the subsequent year. These results suggest an unmet need in patients with osteoporosis and an opportunity for newer therapies to help address this need.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese versions of self-efficacy and outcome expectations for osteoporosis medication adherence scales in Chinese immigrants

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the psychometric properties of Chinese versions self-efficacy and outcome expectations on osteoporosis medication adherence (SEOMA-C and OEOMA-C) scales.

METHODS

Back-translated tools were assessed by internal consistency and R2 by structured equation modeling, confirmatory factor analyses, hypothesis testing, and criterion-related validity among 110 (81 females, 29 males) Mandarin-speaking immigrants (mean age = 63.44, SD = 9.63).

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha for SEOMA-C and OEOMA-C is .904 and .937, respectively. There was fair and good fit of the measurement model to the data. Previous bone mineral density (BMD) testing, calcaneus BMD, self-efficacy for exercise, and osteoporosis medication adherence were positively related to SEOMA-C scores.

CONCLUSION

These scales constitute some preliminary validity and reliability. Further refined and cultural sensitive items could be explored and added.

Persistence at 12 months with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: interim results from a prospective observational study

To determine persistence with subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months in women being treated for osteoporosis, we conducted a single-arm prospective, observational study in the United States and Canada. Among 935 patients enrolled, 12-month persistence was 82%, with 66 patients (7%) reporting serious adverse events and 19 patients (2%) reporting fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Increased persistence with osteoporosis therapy is associated with reduced fracture risk. Denosumab reduced fracture risk in clinical trials; persistence in community settings is undetermined. This study evaluates persistence with denosumab in community practice in the United States (US) and Canada.

METHODS

In a 24-month multicenter, prospective, single-arm, observational study, women being treated for osteoporosis were enrolled ≤4 weeks after the first subcutaneous injection of denosumab. For this 12-month prespecified interim analysis, endpoints include persistence (one injection at study entry and another within 6 months + 8 weeks), attributes associated with persistence (univariate analysis), and serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

Among 935 patients (mean age 71 years), mean baseline T-scores were -2.18 (femoral neck) and -2.00 (lumbar spine); 50% of patients had experienced osteoporotic fracture(s). At 12 months, 82 % of patients were persistent with denosumab. Baseline factors significantly (p < 0.05) associated with higher persistence included use of osteoporosis medications >5 years previously, lumbar spine T-score > -2.5, and treatment by female physicians (US). Lower persistence was associated (p < 0.05) with psychiatric diagnoses including depression, southern US residence, being divorced, separated, or widowed (US), and prior hip fracture (Canada). SAEs were reported in 66 patients (7%); no SAEs of osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical femoral fracture, fracture healing complications, hypocalcemia, eczema, or hypersensitivity were reported. Nineteen patients (2%) reported osteoporotic fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-month persistence observed in this single-arm open-label study of US and Canadian community practice extends the evidence regarding denosumab's potential role in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Long-term persistence and switching patterns among women using osteoporosis therapies: 24- and 36-month results from POSSIBLE US™

Persistence with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) medications is not well characterized beyond 12 months. Of 3,011 postmenopausal women treated in primary care, 36.8 % continued baseline PMO medication during 36 months of follow-up. Many factors were associated with nonpersistence, including newly initiating or switching therapy, and reporting moderate to severe side effects.

INTRODUCTION

Persistence with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) medications is not well characterized beyond 12 months. We describe 24- and 36-month persistence using patient-reported data from women with different PMO treatment histories in the US primary care setting.

METHODS

Data from 3,011 participants of the Prospective Observational Scientific Study Investigating Bone Loss Experience (POSSIBLE US™, 10/2005-12/2008) and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the probability of persisting (i.e., not discontinuing or switching PMO agents) with baseline PMO medication and hazard ratios for predictors of nonpersistence 24 and 36 months after study entry.

RESULTS

The probability of persisting with the baseline medication was 46.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 44.2-48.1 %) during 24 months of follow-up and 36.8 % (95 % CI 34.7-38.9 %) during 36 months of follow-up. In adjusted analyses, newly initiating therapy or switching to a new agent, reporting moderate to severe side effects, having lower disease-specific quality of life scores, smoking, and residing in the South or West USA (all measured at study entry) were independent predictors of nonpersistence in both time periods. The majority of participants who discontinued therapy and had the opportunity to reinitiate (i.e., discontinued ≥4 months before the end of follow-up) restarted therapy (24 months 69 %; 36 months 75 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In this primary care cohort, a minority of women continued their baseline PMO therapy during a 24- to 36-month follow-up. Supporting patients during the initiation of a new therapy or if side effects occur may improve persistence and increase the therapeutic benefit of PMO medications.

A systematic review of osteoporosis medication adherence and osteoporosis-related fracture costs in men

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Male osteoporosis is an increasingly important public health concern. Although several medications are approved for the treatment of osteoporosis, medication non-adherence and the associated consequences are not well documented in male populations. Our objective was to identify and summarize the current knowledge related to osteoporotic medication adherence, the potential implications of non-adherence to the medication, and the cost of osteoporosis-related fractures and health-resource utilization in men.

METHODS

Two separate systematic searches were conducted concurrently: one to identify literature reporting male-specific adherence to anti-osteoporotic medication and the clinical consequence of non-adherence in men, and the other to identify literature reporting the cost and resource burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in men. The PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched using a date range of 1 January 1998 to 30 June 2012, and citations were screened based on pre-defined criteria.

RESULTS

The percentage of males adherent to bisphosphonates [medication possession ratio (MPR) >0.8] over a 1-year period ranged from 32% to 64%. The data imply worse clinical outcomes with treatment non-adherence. Costs and resource use associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in men are high, with hip fractures generating the most cost.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third to two-thirds of men are not adherent to bisphosphonates. Non-adherence is associated with increased fracture risk. Estimates of direct and indirect osteoporosis-related fracture costs are also substantial in men, and may even be more costly than in women. More robust data would better inform disease management initiatives that could improve adherence to medication and outcomes in men with osteoporosis.

Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study

The response rate to the invitation to the fracture liaison service and reasons for non-response were evaluated in 2,207 fragility fracture patients. Fifty-one percent responded; non-responders were most often not interested (38 %) or were hip fracture patients. After 1 year of treatment, 88 % was still persistent and 2 % had a new fracture.

INTRODUCTION

To increase the percentage of elderly fracture patients undergoing a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement, and to investigate why some patients did not respond to invitation to our fracture liaison service (FLS).

METHODS

In four Dutch hospitals, fracture patients ≥ 50 years were invited through a written or personal invitation at the surgical outpatient department, for a DXA measurement and visit to our FLS. Patients who did not respond were contacted by telephone. In patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, treatment was started. Patients were contacted every 3 months during 1 year to assess drug persistence and the occurrence of subsequent fractures.

RESULTS

Of the 2,207 patients who were invited, 50.6 % responded. Most frequent reasons for not responding included: not interested (38 %), already screened/under treatment for osteoporosis (15.7 %), physically unable to attend the clinic (11.5 %), and death (5.2 %). Hip fracture patients responded less frequently (29 %) while patients with a wrist (60 %) or ankle fracture (65.2 %) were more likely to visit the clinic. In 337 responding patients, osteoporosis was diagnosed and treatment was initiated. After 12 months of follow-up, 88 % of the patients were still persistent with anti-osteoporosis therapy and only 2 % suffered a subsequent clinical fracture.

CONCLUSION

In elderly fracture patients, the use of a FLS leads to an increased response rate, a high persistence to drug treatment, and a low rate of subsequent clinical fractures. Additional programs for hip fracture patients are required, as these patients have a low response rate.

Substantial under-treatment among women diagnosed with osteoporosis in a US managed-care population: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple therapies are approved for the treatment of osteoporosis (OP), but many patients with osteoporosis may not initiate treatment upon osteoporosis diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize initiation of pharmacologic OP treatment among women within 1 year of OP diagnosis in a US managed care population.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The retrospective cohort study included women aged ≥55 years with a claims-documented diagnosis of OP who were naïve to OP medications prior to OP diagnosis (index date) during 2001-2010. Continuous enrollment for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date was required. Patients who received OP medications but did not have an OP diagnosis were excluded. Differences in baseline characteristics between the treated and untreated cohorts were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum (continuous variables) and chi-square tests (categorical variables).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

During the follow-up period, the percentages of patients treated with bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid) and non-bisphosphonates (calcitonin, raloxifene, teriparatide) were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 65,344 patients, mean age 65.7 years, met study inclusion exclusion criteria. During the follow-up period, 42,033 patients (64.3%) received no OP medication and 23,311 patients (35.7%) received OP treatment. A total of 20,200 patients (30.9% of total study population) received bisphosphonates and 3111 (4.8% of total) patients received non-bisphosphonates as their index medication. At baseline, untreated patients were slightly older and had higher rates of hypertension, chronic inflammatory joint disease, diabetes mellitus, and gastrointestinal events (p ≤ 0.01) compared with treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women aged ≥55 years in a US managed-care population, 64.3% received no pharmacologic treatment within 1 year after being diagnosed with OP. The authors were not able to determine if untreated patients did not receive or did not fill a prescription. Further research is needed to understand the barriers to OP treatment and reasons for non-treatment.

Osteoporosis drugs in real-world clinical practice: an analysis of persistence

The aim of our retrospective cohort study is to analyze the persistence rates in relation to antiosteoporotic drugs using administrative databases in the Campania Region. Patients, aged ≥40 years, were included if at least one prescription for any antiosteoporotic drugs had been filled in between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009. Overall, 37,594 patients were incident users of antiosteoporotic drugs. Among them, 15,978 patients had undergone spot-therapies. A total of 2,618 (14.1%) were classified as switchers. Switching rates were highest for patients taking Alendronate 18.9 or Strontium Ranelate 15.0 and lower for patients taking Ibandronate 12.8 or Risedronate 10.8. In the overall population, 33.5% of subjects were still on therapy after 6 months. At 1 year, persistence rates were: Ibandronate 21.6%, Risedronate 15.8%, Alendronate + Vitamin D 15.7%, Raloxifene 14.3%, Alendronate 12.6% and Strontium Ranelate 5.0%.

Premenopausal women with a distal radial fracture have deteriorated trabecular bone density and morphology compared with controls without a fracture

BACKGROUND

Measurement of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry combined with clinical risk factors is currently the gold standard in diagnosing osteoporosis. Advanced imaging has shown that older patients with fragility fractures have poor bone microarchitecture, often independent of low bone mineral density. We hypothesized that premenopausal women with a fracture of the distal end of the radius have similar bone mineral density but altered bone microarchitecture compared with control subjects without a fracture.

METHODS

Forty premenopausal women with a recent distal radial fracture were prospectively recruited and matched with eighty control subjects without a fracture. Primary outcome variables included trabecular and cortical microarchitecture at the distal end of the radius and tibia by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone mineral density at the wrist, hip, and lumbar spine was also measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

The fracture and control groups did not differ with regard to age, race, or body mass index. Bone mineral density was similar at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and distal one-third of the radius, but tended to be lower in the fracture group at the hip and ultradistal part of the radius (p = 0.06). Trabecular microarchitecture was deteriorated in the fracture group compared with the control group at both the distal end of the radius and distal end of the tibia. At the distal end of the radius, the fracture group had lower total density and lower trabecular density, number, and thickness compared with the control group (-6% to -14%; p < 0.05 for all). At the distal end of the tibia, total density, trabecular density, trabecular thickness, and cortical thickness were lower in the fracture group than in the control group (-7% to -14%; p < 0.01). Conditional logistic regression showed that trabecular density, thickness, separation, and distribution of trabecular separation remained significantly associated with fracture after adjustment for age and ultradistal radial bone mineral density (adjusted odds ratios [OR]: 2.01 to 2.98; p < 0.05). At the tibia, total density, trabecular density, thickness, cortical area, and cortical thickness remained significantly associated with fracture after adjustment for age and femoral neck bone mineral density (adjusted OR:1.62 to 2.40; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar bone mineral density values by dual x-ray absorptiometry, premenopausal women with a distal radial fracture have significantly poorer bone microarchitecture at the distal end of the radius and tibia compared with control subjects without a fracture. Early identification of women with poor bone health offers opportunities for interventions aimed at preventing further deterioration and reducing fracture risk.

Are changes in bone mineral density different between groups of early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated according to a tight control strategy with or without prednisone if osteoporosis prophylaxis is applied?

Addition of 10 mg prednisone daily to a methotrexate-based tight control strategy does not lead to bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving preventive treatment for osteoporosis. A small increase in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) during the first year of treatment was recorded, regardless of use of glucocorticoids.

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to describe effects on BMD of treatment according to EULAR guidelines with a methotrexate-based tight control strategy including 10 mg prednisone daily versus the same strategy without prednisone in early RA patients who received preventive therapy for osteoporosis.

METHODS

Early RA patients were included in the CAMERA-II trial: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 2-year trial, in which effects of addition of 10 mg prednisone daily to a methotrexate-based tight control strategy were studied. All patients received calcium, vitamin D and bisphosphonates. Disease activity was assessed every 4 weeks. Radiographs of hands and feet and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar spine and left hip were performed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of treatment.

RESULTS

BMD increased significantly over time in both treatment groups at the lumbar spine with a mean of 2.6% during the first year (p<0.001), but not at the hip; at none of the time points did BMD differ significantly between the prednisone and placebo group. Higher age and lower weight at baseline and higher disease activity scores during the trial, but not glucocorticoid therapy, were associated with lower BMD at both the lumbar spine and the hip in mixed-model analyses.

CONCLUSION

Addition of 10 mg prednisone daily to a methotrexate-based tight control strategy does not lead to bone loss in early RA patients on bisphosphonates. A small increase in lumbar BMD during the first year of treatment was found, regardless of use of glucocorticoids.

Revisiting the medication possession ratio threshold for adherence in lipid management

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the relationship between different levels of medication possession ratio (MPR) attained and achievement of clinically meaningful reductions in lipid levels.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 4691 new statin users from the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). Subjects were required to be eligible for VA medical and pharmacy services throughout the 1 year study period from index date and to have complete data for exposure, outcome, and adjustment variables. MPR was defined as number of days supplied with prescription medication divided by days of observation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Achieving 25% or greater reduction from baseline in lipid levels for three lipid outcomes: non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and total cholesterol (TC).

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant trend of an increasing proportion of study subjects achieving a 25% reduction or more for all three lipid outcomes (p-values <0.001 for each of the three outcomes using the Cochran-Armitage trend test). Using multiple logistic regression, odds ratios (ORs) for each of the three outcomes were at a maximum for the 0.9-1.0 MPR category with ORs of 12.90 (95% confidence interval (CI), 9.60, 17.35) for the non-HDL cholesterol outcome; 11.29 (95% CI, 8.61, 14.80) for the LDL cholesterol outcome; and 9.11 (95% CI, 6.62, 12.53) for the TC outcome. Direct comparison of the 0.9-1.0 MPR category versus the 0.8-0.89 MPR category demonstrated an increase in odds of achieving 25% or more reduction for all three lipid outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that significant improvements in outcomes are achieved with higher MPR thresholds than commonly targeted. The authors propose consideration of an MPR-adherence threshold of 0.9 MPR. Limitations include the possible modification of study findings in non-VA settings. MPR is a secondary adherence measure based on refill frequency.