Type 1 diabetes onset at young age is associated with compromised bone quality

Greater Urinary Calcium Excretion Is Associated With Diminished Bone Accrual in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

The adverse skeletal effects of type 1 diabetes (T1D) include deficient bone accrual and lifelong increased fracture risk. The contributors to impaired bone accrual in people with T1D are incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if urinary calcium excretion is associated with impaired bone accrual in youth with T1D and to characterize the contribution of glycemic control and markers of bone mineral metabolism to urinary calcium excretion.

DESIGN

Observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty participants with T1D aged 6 to 20 years completed a 12-month longitudinal study of bone accrual. A second cohort of 99 similarly aged participants with T1D completed cross-sectional 24-hour urine and blood collections.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Whole body less head bone mineral content (WBLH BMC) velocity Z-score and fractional excretion of calcium (FeCa).

RESULTS

Participants in the bone accrual cohort had lower WBLH BMC velocity compared to a healthy reference dataset (Z-score -0.3 ± 1.0, P = .03). FeCa was negatively associated with WBLH BMC velocity Z-score, ρ = -0.47, P = .001. In the urinary calcium excretion cohort, intact PTH (β = -0.4, P = .01), beta c-telopeptide (β = 0.35, P = .007), and either hemoglobin A1c (β = 0.08, P = .03) or urine fractional glucose excretion (β = 0.07, P = .03) were associated with FeCa in multivariable regression models that included known determinants of urinary calcium excretion.

CONCLUSION

Urinary calcium excretion was negatively associated with bone accrual in this cohort of youth with T1D. Mechanistic studies are needed to determine if interventions to reduce urinary calcium excretion could increase bone accrual and reduce skeletal fragility in people with T1D.

The effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone health in chronic kidney disease

Fracture is an under-recognized but common complication of diabetes mellitus, with an incidence approaching twofold in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and up to sevenfold in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) compared with that in the general population. Both T1DM and T2DM induce chronic hyperglycaemia, leading to the accumulation of advanced glycosylation end products that affect osteoblast function, increased collagen crosslinking and a senescence phenotype promoting inflammation. Together with an increased incidence of microvascular disease and an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency, these factors reduce bone quality, thereby increasing bone fragility. In T1DM, reduced anabolic stimuli as well as the presence of autoimmune conditions might also contribute to reduced bone mass and increased fragility. Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of kidney failure, and fracture risk is exacerbated when chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related mineral and bone disorders are superimposed on diabetic changes. Microvascular pathology, cortical thinning and trabecular deterioration are particularly prominent in patients with T1DM and CKD, who suffer more fragility fractures than do other patients with CKD. This Review explores the pathophysiology of bone fragility in patients with diabetes mellitus and CKD and discusses techniques to predict fracture and pharmacotherapy that might reduce fracture risk.

Microvascular disease and early diabetes onset are associated with deficits in femoral neck bone density and structure among older adults with longstanding type 1 diabetes

Adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have increased hip fracture risk, yet no studies have assessed volumetric bone density or structure at the hip in older adults with T1D. Here, we used previously collected 3D CT scans of the proximal femur from older adults with longstanding T1D and non-diabetic controls to identify bone deficits that may contribute to hip fracture in T1D. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 101 adults with T1D and 181 age-, sex-, and race-matched non-diabetic controls (CON) who received abdominal or pelvis CT exams from 2010 to 2020. Among adults with T1D, 33 (33%) had mild-to-moderate nephropathy, 61 (60%) had neuropathy, and 71 (70%) had retinopathy. Within the whole cohort, adults with T1D tended to have lower FN density, though differences did not reach statistical significance. The subset of the T1D group who were diagnosed before age 15 had lower total BMC (-14%, TtBMC), cortical BMC (-19.5%, CtBMC), and smaller Ct cross-sectional area (-12.6, CtCSA) than their matched controls (p<.05 for all). Individuals with T1D who were diagnosed at a later age did not differ from controls in any bone outcome (p>.21). Furthermore, adults with T1D and nephropathy had lower FN aBMD (-10.6%), TtBMC (-17%), CtBMC (-24%), and smaller CtCSA (-15.4%) compared to matched controls (p<.05 for all). Adults with T1D and neuropathy had cortical bone deficits (8.4%-12%, p<.04). In summary, among older adults with T1D, those who were diagnosed before the age of 15 yr, as well as those with nephropathy and neuropathy had unfavorable bone outcomes at the FN, which may contribute to the high risk of hip fractures among patients with T1D. These novel observations highlight the longstanding detrimental impact of T1D when present during bone accrual and skeletal fragility as an additional complication of microvascular disease in individuals with T1D.

Diabetes Risk Factors and Bone Microarchitecture as Assessed by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography in Adults With Long-standing Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether type 1 diabetes and its complications are associated with bone geometry and microarchitecture.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was embedded in a long-term observational study. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) scans of the distal radius and distal and diaphyseal tibia were performed in a subset of 183 participants with type 1 diabetes from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study and 94 control participants without diabetes. HbA1c, skin advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and diabetes-related complications were assessed in EDIC participants with >30 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared with control participants (aged 60 ± 8 years, 65% female), EDIC participants (aged 60 ± 7 years, diabetes duration 38 ± 5 years, 51% female) had lower total bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal radius (-7.9% [95% CI -15.2%, -0.6%]; P = 0.030) and distal tibia (-11.3% [95% CI -18.5%, -4.2%]; P = 0.001); larger total area at all sites (distal radius 4.7% [95% CI 0.5%, 8.8%; P = 0.030]; distal tibia 5.9% [95% CI 2.1%, 9.8%; P = 0.003]; diaphyseal tibia 3.4% [95% CI 0.8%, 6.1%; P = 0.011]); and poorer radius trabecular and cortical microarchitecture. Estimated failure load was similar between the two groups. Among EDIC participants, higher HbA1c, AGE levels, and macroalbuminuria were associated with lower total BMD. Macroalbuminuria was associated with larger total area and lower cortical thickness at the distal radius. Higher HbA1c and AGE levels and lower glomerular filtration rate, peripheral neuropathy, and retinopathy were associated with deficits in trabecular microarchitecture.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 1 diabetes is associated with lower BMD, larger bone area, and poorer trabecular microarchitecture. Among participants with type 1 diabetes, suboptimal glycemic control, AGE accumulation, and microvascular complications are associated with deficits in bone microarchitecture and lower BMD.

Maternal diabetes and fracture risk in offspring: a population-based analysis

Factors affecting intrauterine environment exerts influence on skeletal health and fracture risk in later life. Diabetes during pregnancy is known to influence birth weight and is associated with fetal overgrowth. However, the effects of maternal diabetes on fracture risk in offspring is unknown. This study was aimed to evaluate the association between maternal diabetes and fracture risk in offspring. Using population-based administrative health data for Manitoba, Canada, we identified deliveries complicated by gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes between April 1, 1980, and March 31, 2020. The cohort was followed for a median of 15.8 yr. The primary outcome was any incident fracture in offspring. Secondary outcomes were long bone upper extremity fracture, long bone lower extremity fracture, vertebral fracture, and any non-trauma fractures. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate fracture risk in offspring by maternal diabetes status adjusted for relevant covariates. Of the 585 176 deliveries, 26 397 offspring were born to women with diabetes (3.0% gestational diabetes and 1.5% type 2 diabetes), and 558 779 were born to women without diabetes. The adjusted risk for any fracture was 7% (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 2.7-11.5%) higher in the offspring of mothers with diabetes than offspring of mothers without diabetes. Types of fractures were similar between the 2 groups with a predominance of long bone upper extremity fractures. In conclusion, maternal diabetes was associated with a modest increase in fracture risk in offspring. Longitudinal prospective studies are needed to understand intrauterine and postnatal factors that may influence fracture risk in the offspring of mothers with diabetes.

Use of noninvasive imaging to identify causes of skeletal fragility in adults with diabetes: a review

Diabetes, a disease marked by consistent high blood glucose levels, is associated with various complications such as neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular disease. Notably, skeletal fragility has emerged as a significant complication in both type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetic patients. This review examines noninvasive imaging studies that evaluate skeletal outcomes in adults with T1D and T2D, emphasizing distinct skeletal phenotypes linked with each condition and pinpointing gaps in understanding bone health in diabetes. Although traditional DXA-BMD does not fully capture the increased fracture risk in diabetes, recent techniques such as quantitative computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, high-resolution quantitative computed tomography, and MRI provide insights into 3D bone density, microstructure, and strength. Notably, existing studies present heterogeneous results possibly due to variations in design, outcome measures, and potential misclassification between T1D and T2D. Thus, the true nature of diabetic skeletal fragility is yet to be fully understood. As T1D and T2D are diverse conditions with heterogeneous subtypes, future research should delve deeper into skeletal fragility by diabetic phenotypes and focus on longitudinal studies in larger, diverse cohorts to elucidate the complex influence of T1D and T2D on bone health and fracture outcomes.

Trabecular bone score in adults with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with a disproportionately high fracture rate despite a minimal decrease in bone mineral density. Though trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect measure of bone architecture, is lower in adults with T1DM, the modest difference is unlikely to account for the large excess risk and calls for further exploration.

INTRODUCTION

Fracture rates in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are disproportionately high compared to the modestly low bone mineral density (BMD). Distortion of bone microarchitecture compromises bone quality in T1DM and is indirectly measured by trabecular bone score (TBS). TBS could potentially be used as a screening tool for skeletal assessment; however, there are inconsistencies in the studies evaluating TBS in T1DM. We performed this meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science resources (all-year time span) to identify studies relating to TBS in T1DM. Cross-sectional and retrospective studies in adults with T1DM were included. TBS and BMD data were extracted for pooled analysis. Fracture risk could not be analyzed as there were insufficient studies reporting it.

RESULT

Data from six studies were included (T1DM: n = 378 and controls: n = 286). Pooled analysis showed a significantly lower TBS [standardized mean difference (SMD) =  - 0.37, 95% CI - 0.52 to - 0.21; p < 0.00001] in T1DM compared to controls. There was no difference in the lumbar spine BMD (6 studies, SMD - 0.06, 95% CI - 0.22 to 0.09; p = 0.43) and total hip BMD (6 studies, SMD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.35 to 0.01; p = 0.06) in the case and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with T1DM have a lower TBS but similar total hip and lumbar spine BMD compared to controls. The risk attributable to the significant but limited difference in TBS falls short of explaining the large excess propensity to fragility fracture in adults with T1DM. Further studies on clarification of the mechanism and whether TBS is suited to screen for fracture risk in adults with T1DM are necessary.

Bone Structure and Turnover in Postmenopausal Women With Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes

Compromised bone structural and mechanical properties are implicated in the increased fracture risk in type 1 diabetes (T1D). We investigated bone structure and turnover by histomorphometry in postmenopausal women with T1D and controls without diabetes using tetracycline double-labeled transiliac bone biopsy. After in vivo tetracycline double labeling, postmenopausal women with T1D of at least 10 years and without diabetes underwent transiliac bone biopsy. An expert blinded to the study group performed histomorphometry. Static and dynamic histomorphometry measurements were performed and compared between the two groups. The analysis included 9 postmenopausal women with T1D (mean age 58.4 ± 7.1 years with 37.9 ± 10.9 years of diabetes and HbA1c 7.1% ± 0.4%) and 7 postmenopausal women without diabetes (mean age 60.9 ± 3.3 years and HbA1c 5.4% ± 0.2%). There were no significant differences in serum PTH (38.6 ± 8.1 versus 51.9 ± 23.9 pg/mL), CTX (0.4 ± 0.2 versus 0.51 ± 0.34 ng/mL), or P1NP (64.5 ± 26.2 versus 87.3 ± 45.3 ng/mL). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were higher in T1D than in controls (53.1 ± 20.8 versus 30.9 ± 8.2 ng/mL, p < 0.05). Bone structure metrics (bone volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, and cortical thickness) were similar between the groups. Indices of bone formation (osteoid volume, osteoid surface, and bone formation rate) were 40% lower in T1D and associated with lower activation frequency. However, the differences in bone formation were not statistically significant. Long-standing T1D may affect bone turnover, mainly bone formation, without significantly affecting bone structure. Further research is needed to understand bone turnover and factors affecting bone turnover in people with T1D. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Causal relationship between Type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis and fracture occurrence: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

We used two-sample Mendelian Randomization to reveal causal estimates of type 1 diabetes and bone. Type 1 diabetes was found to be a risk factor for bone metabolic health, although there was no clear evidence to support a genetic association between type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis and fracture risk.

INTRODUCTION

Based on the random assignment of gametes at conception, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis simulates randomized controlled trials in an observational setting. Therefore, we used MR to assess the association causality of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with fractures and osteoporosis.

METHODS

From a genome-wide association meta-analysis, independent single nucleotide polymorphisms closely associated with T1D were selected as instrumental variables. Data on fracture and osteoporosis were obtained from the FinnGen Consortium. We performed a two-sample MR analysis, using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) as the primary analysis method, to assess possible causal associations between T1D and bone risk. The results were verified by MR-Egger regression and median weighted method (WME). MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger intercepts were used to evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy of instrumental variables, and the Q-test and "leave-one-out" methods were used to test the heterogeneity of MR results.

RESULTS

IVW (OR=1.040, 95% CI=0.974-1.109, P=0.238), MR-Egger regression (OR=1.077, 95% CI=0.921-1.260, P=0.372) and WME (OR=1.021, 95% CI=0.935-1.114, P=0.643) all showed that there was no causal relationship between T1D and osteoporosis, but the direction was consistent. The indicative significance of IVW results in T1D and forearm fractures (OR=1.062, 95% CI=1.010-1.117, P=0.020), but the results are not robust enough. There was no causal effect in femur, lumbar and pelvis, or shoulder and upper arm fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

After MR analysis, although T1D may be a risk factor for bone health, we do not have sufficient evidence to support a causal effect of T1D on osteoporosis and fractures at a genetically predicted level. More cases need to be included for analysis.

Onset of type 1 diabetes during bone growth period is associated with increased prevalence of bone fracture: A post-hoc analysis of a cross-sectional study

In this single-center, cross-sectional study, we demonstrated that the prevalence of fracture was significantly higher in patients who onset type 1 diabetes during 0-4 years, and 10-14 years compared with adult-onset type 1 diabetes. We are aware that this study contains a lot of limitations including non-prospective study design and a small number of participants. However, the results of this study, if followed by a larger cohort study, could provide important insights into the increased risk of fracture in patients with type 1 diabetes, and suggest the need for attention and perhaps early intervention for patients with type 1 diabetes who developed during these periods.

Femoral neck structural properties are altered in adults with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To determine differences in hip geometry in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared with healthy adults without diabetes.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 43 adults with T1D (mean age 56 years, 84 % female, 92 % White, mean duration of diabetes of 39 years, A1c of 7.8 %) and 40 adults without diabetes (mean age 60 years, 80 % female, 77 % white) who had hip dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from previous studies were included. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and measures of hip structural properties at the narrow neck, intertrochanteric and femoral shaft regions of the left proximal femur were analyzed between adults with T1D and controls using linear models controlled for age, sex, and body mass index.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in DXA-based aBMD at the hip (0.769 ± 0.132 vs. 0.900 ± 0.139 g/cm2, p = 0.07) or femoral neck (0.722 ± 0.116 vs. 0.849 ± 0.114 g/cm2, p = 0.09) regions between adults with T1D and controls. When controlling for age, sex, and BMI, DXA-based aBMD at the hip (0.880 ± 0.022 vs. 0.943 ± 0.020 g/cm2, p = 0.02) and femoral neck (0.750 ± 0.021 vs. 0.812 ± 0.020 g/cm2, p = 0.02) regions were significantly lower in adults with T1D than controls. Cortical thickness was significantly lower in all three hip regions in adults with T1D than in controls (narrow-neck: 0.169 ± 0.005 vs. 0.186 ± 0.005 cm, p = 0.011; intertrochanteric: 0.388 ± 0.013 vs. 0.425 ± 0.012 cm, p = 0.017; femoral shaft: 0.529 ± 0.017 vs. 0.586 ± 0.016 cm, p = 0.006). Moreover, adults with T1D had a smaller cross-sectional area at the narrow-neck (3.06 ± 0.09 vs. 3.32 ± 0.08 cm2, p = 0.015), a higher femoral shaft endocortical diameter (2.23 ± 0.07 vs. 2.02 ± 0.06 cm, p = 0.011), and higher buckling ratios (an indicator of cortical instability) at the intertrochanteric (9.22 ± 0.34 vs. 8.23 ± 0.32, p = 0.016) and femoral shaft (3.32 ± 0.15 vs. 2.89 ± 0.14, p = 0.016) regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with T1D have several significant differences in proximal femur morphology compared with controls. These morphological differences may adversely affect the mechanical integrity of the proximal femur, thereby contributing to an increased risk of fracture in the event of a fall.

Bone deficits in children and youth with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Deficits in bone mineral and weaker bone structure in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may contribute to a lifelong risk of fracture. However, there is no meta-analysis comparing bone properties beyond density between children with T1D and typically developing children (TDC). This meta-analysis aimed to assess differences and related factors in bone mineral content (BMC), density, area, micro-architecture and estimated strength between children with T1D and TDC. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases, and included 36 in the meta-analysis (2222 children and youth with T1D, 2316 TDC; mean age ≤18 yrs., range 1-24). We estimated standardized mean differences (SMD) using random-effects models and explored the role of age, body size, sex ratio, disease duration, hemoglobin A1c in relation to BMC and areal density (aBMD) SMD using meta-regressions. Children and youth with T1D had lower total body BMC (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.05), aBMD (-0.30, -0.50 to -0.11); lumbar spine BMC (-0.17, -0.28 to -0.06), aBMD (-0.20, -0.32 to -0.08), bone mineral apparent density (-0.30, -0.48 to -0.13); femoral neck aBMD (-0.21, -0.33 to -0.09); distal radius and tibia trabecular density (-0.38, -0.64 to -0.12 and -0.35, -0.51 to -0.18, respectively) and bone volume fraction (-0.33, -0.56 to -0.09 and -0.37, -0.60 to -0.14, respectively); distal tibia trabecular thickness (-0.41, -0.67 to -0.16); and tibia shaft cortical content (-0.33, -0.56 to -0.10). Advanced age was associated with larger SMD in total body BMC (-0.13, -0.21 to -0.04) and aBMD (-0.09; -0.17 to -0.01) and longer disease duration with larger SMD in total body aBMD (-0.14; -0.24 to -0.04). Children and youth with T1D have lower BMC, aBMD and deficits in trabecular density and micro-architecture. Deficits in BMC and aBMD appeared to increase with age and disease duration. Bone deficits may contribute to fracture risk and require attention in diabetes research and care. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020200819).

Insulin resistance and skeletal health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bone fragility is a complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and insulin resistance is suspected to contribute to diabetes-related bone deficits. This article provides an overview of emerging clinical research involving insulin resistance and bone health by summarizing recent publications, identifying existing knowledge gaps, and suggesting 'next steps' for this evolving field of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies in children and adults report greater bone density in people with increased insulin resistance, but these associations are often attenuated when adjusting for body size. Advancements in bone imaging methods allow for assessment of nuanced characteristics of bone quality and strength that extend beyond standard bone mineral density assessment methods. For example, several recent studies focusing on lumbar spine trabecular bone score, a relatively new measure of trabecular bone quality from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, have reported generally consistent inverse associations with insulin resistance. Longitudinal studies using advanced imaging methods capable of evaluating trabecular bone microstructure and strength, such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, are lacking. Studies in younger individuals are sparse, but emerging data suggest that peak bone mass attainment might be threatened by diabetes progression, and increased visceral fat, suppressed muscle-bone unit, advanced glycation end-products, sedentary lifestyle, and poor diet quality might contribute to diabetes effects on bone. Prospective studies during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood are required.

SUMMARY

Insulin resistance is a main feature of T2D, which is suspected to contribute to subclinical diabetes-related threats to bone health. Future clinical studies should focus on the critical years surrounding peak bone mass and peak bone strength attainment using contemporary imaging techniques.

Effects of diabetes on osteocytes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying skeletal dysfunction in the context of diabetes is needed to guide the development of therapeutic interventions to reduce the burden of diabetic fractures. Osteocytes, the 'master regulators' of bone remodeling, have emerged as key culprits in the pathogenesis of diabetes-related skeletal fragility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes cause chronic hyperglycemia that, over time, reduces bone quality and bone formation. In addition to acting as mechanosensors, osteocytes are important regulators of osteoblast and osteoclast activities; however, diabetes leads to osteocyte dysfunction. Indeed, diabetes causes the accumulation of advanced glycation end-products and senescent cells that can affect osteocyte viability and functions via increased receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) signaling or the production of a pro-inflammatory senescence-associated secretory phenotype. These changes may increase osteocyte-derived sclerostin production and decrease the ability of osteocytes to sense mechanical stimuli thereby contributing to poor bone quality in humans with diabetes.

SUMMARY

Osteocyte dysfunction exists at the nexus of diabetic skeletal disease. Therefore, interventions targeting the RAGE signaling pathway, senescent cells, and those that inhibit sclerostin or mechanically stimulate osteocytes may alleviate the deleterious effects of diabetes on osteocytes and bone quality.

Imaging techniques to study diabetic bone disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review article presents the most recent research on bone fragility in individuals with diabetes from a medical imaging perspective.

RECENT FINDINGS

The widespread availability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and trabecular bone score (TBS) software has led to recent assessments of bone fragility with this texture parameter in several studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), but in few of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Although most studies show a trend of reduced TBS values in T2D independent of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the lumbar spine, some studies also show the limitations of TBS in both T2D and T1D. Given the limitations of DXA to assess bone strength and investigate the etiology of bone fragility in diabetes, more investigators are incorporating three-dimensional (3D) medical imaging techniques in their studies. Recent use of 3D medical imaging to assess bone fragility in the setting of diabetes has been mostly limited to a few cross-sectional studies predominantly incorporating high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Although HR-pQCT studies indicate higher tibial cortical porosity in subjects with T2D, results are inconsistent in T1D due to differences in study designs, sample sizes, and subject characteristics, among other factors. With respect to central CT, recent studies support a previous finding in the literature indicating femoral neck geometrical impairments in subjects with T2D and provide encouraging results for the incorporation of finite element analysis (FEA) to assess bone strength in studies of T2D. In the recent literature, there are no studies assessing bone fragility in T1D with QCT, and only two studies used pQCT reporting tibial and radial impairments in young women and children with T1D, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been recently used in diabetic studies of bone fragility.

SUMMARY

As bone fragility in diabetes is not explained by DXA-derived aBMD and given the limitations of cross-sectional studies, it is imperative to use 3D imaging techniques for longitudinal assessments of the density, quality, and microenvironment of bone to improve our understanding of the effects of diabetes on bone and reduce the risk of fracture in this large and vulnerable population of subjects with diabetes.

Exogenous melatonin prevents type 1 diabetes mellitus-induced bone loss, probably by inhibiting senescence

Exogenous melatonin inhibited the senescence of preosteoblast cells in type 1 diabetic (T1D) mice and those cultured in high glucose (HG) by multiple regulations. Exogenous melatonin had a protective effect on diabetic osteoporosis, which may depend on the inhibition of senescence.

INTRODUCTION

Senescence is thought to play an important role in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying diabetic bone loss. Increasing evidence has shown that melatonin exerts anti-senescence effects. In this study, we investigated whether melatonin can inhibit senescence and prevent diabetic bone loss.

METHODS

C57BL/6 mice received a single intraperitoneal injection of 160 mg/kg streptozotocin, followed by the oral administration of melatonin or vehicle for 2 months. Then, tissues were harvested and subsequently examined. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured under HG conditions for 7 days and then treated with melatonin or not for 24 h. Sirt1-specific siRNAs and MT1- or MT2-specific shRNA plasmids were transfected into MC3T3-E1 cells for mechanistic study.

RESULTS

The total protein extracted from mouse femurs revealed that melatonin prevented senescence in T1D mice. The micro-CT results indicated that melatonin prevented bone loss in T1D mice. Cellular experiments indicated that melatonin administration prevented HG-induced senescence, whereas knockdown of the melatonin receptors MT1 or MT2 abolished these effects. Sirt1 expression was upregulated by melatonin administration but significantly reduced after MT1 or MT2 was knocked down. Knockdown of Sirt1 blocked the anti-senescence effects of melatonin. Additionally, melatonin promoted the expression of CDK2, CDK4, and CyclinD1, while knockdown of MT1 or MT2 abolished these effects. Furthermore, melatonin increased the expression of the polycomb repressive complex (PRC), but knockdown of MT1 or MT2 abolished these effects. Furthermore, melatonin increased the protein levels of Sirt1, PRC1/2 complex-, and cell cycle-related proteins.

CONCLUSION

This work shows that melatonin protects against T1D-induced bone loss, probably by inhibiting senescence. Targeting senescence in the investigation of diabetic osteoporosis may lead to novel discoveries.

Bone accrual in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: current knowledge and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Skeletal fragility is now recognized as a significant complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Many patients with T1D develop the disease in childhood and prior to the attainment of peak bone mass and strength. This manuscript will review recent studies investigating the effects of T1D on skeletal development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mild-to-moderate deficits in bone density, structure, and mineral accrual were reported early in the course of T1D in some but not all studies. Childhood-onset disease was associated with a more severe skeletal phenotype in some adult studies. Lower than expected bone mass for muscle size was been described. Hemoglobin A1c was negatively associated with bone density and structure in several studies, though the mechanism was not clear.

SUMMARY

The use of advanced imaging techniques has shown that the adverse effects of T1D on the developing skeleton extend beyond bone density to include abnormalities in bone size, shape, microarchitecture, and strength. Despite these gains, a uniform understanding of the pathophysiology underlying skeletal fragility in this disorder remains elusive. Longitudinal studies, especially in association with interventions to reduce hyperglycemia or improve muscle strength, are needed to inform bone healthcare in T1D.

Are diabetes microvascular complications risk factors for fragility fracture?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We describe relationships between microvascular complications and bone fragility fracture in the context of diabetes. We highlight gaps in knowledge and suggest areas of further study.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence in type 1 diabetes (T1D) demonstrates that low bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with microvascular complications and linked to increased fracture risk. Of note, the low BMD does not solely explain bone fragility. Microvascular disease also has been linked to compromised bone microarchitecture and poorer bone quality. Moreover, microvascular complications may indirectly increase the rate of fragility fracture through increasing fall propensity; however, to date no conclusive studies have assessed microvascular disease and fracture risk independent of falls.In the other hand, individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have increased fracture risk despite high BMD. Data suggest microvascular disease mediates microarchitectural changes by increasing cortical porosity and is associated with lower bone turnover. There is no direct evidence linking microangiopathy to fracture incidence.

SUMMARY

Taken together present evidence suggests associations between diabetic bone disease, fragility fracture, and microvascular disease. Data are more convincing for T1D than T2D. Further studies are required to confirm whether microvascular disease is itself causative of fracture or merely a contributory factor to fragility fracture for persons with diabetes.

Bone and body characteristics of freestyle and nonfreestyle skiers

BACKGROUND

Freestyle skiers must optimize their aerial performance by maintaining the strength and coordination to propel themselves in the air and adapt to landings and take-offs on uneven surfaces. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and body composition in freestyle skiers and nonfreestyle skiing controls.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the unique demands and summation of forces experienced by freestyle athletes would manifest as greater femoral neck aBMD, lower percent body fat, and lower BMI than nonfreestyle skiing controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Retrospective Cohort Study.

METHODS

18 freestyle skiers (14M 4F, [27.56 ± 5.22 years]) and 15 controls (7M 8F, [26.93 ± 3.54 years]) were measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to determine total body composition, hip and lumbar spine aBMD, and bone mineral composition (BMC). Height and weight were measured with an in-office stadiometer and scale. Questionnaires were used to determine physical activity and pertinent medical history. Between-group variations were analyzed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and stratified by sex.

RESULTS

Percent body fat, hip and lumbar spine aBMD, BMC, and area were all similar between freeski and nonfreeski athletes (p<0.05 for all). BMI was significantly lower in male freeski athletes (23.97kg/m2, 95% CI [22.75-25.18]) compared to nonfreestyle skiing controls (26.64kg/m2, 95% CI [24.43-28.86]) (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Freestyle skiers have a lower BMI than nonfreestyle skiers. All skiers in this study has similar percent body fat, aBMD, and BMC. This pilot study supports that there are unique musculoskeletal adaptations based on type of skiing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Skiers endure a variety of intense physical forces yet remain understudied despite high orthopedic injury rates. This study serves to broaden the current sports health literature and explore the physical demands and subsequent physiology of freestyle skiers.

Fracture risk assessment (FRAX) without BMD and risk of major osteoporotic fractures in adults with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) and risk for major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) in type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Subjects with type 1 diabetes and without diabetes from the 'Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes' study were included. Risk for MOF was calculated using FRAX-based clinical risk factors and without BMD at visit 3 (2006-2008). Incident fractures were defined as fractures that occurred between visit 3 and visit 4 (2013-2017). Survival models were used to study the predictability of new MOF by diabetes status.

RESULTS

346 type 1 diabetes (mean age 43.3 ± 9, BMI 26.4 ± 5, diabetes duration 29.4 ± 8.6 years, A1c 7.8 ± 1.1) and 411 controls (mean age 46.9 ± 9 years, BMI 26.3 ± 5 kg/m², A1c 5.5 ± 0.4) were analyzed in this study. In unadjusted survival analysis, the FRAX score without BMD was significantly associated with MOF (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13, p < 0.0001), and remained significantly associated after adjustment for age and sex (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.15, p = 0.0007) and type 1 diabetes (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12, p = 0.0002). In the fully adjusted model (adjusted for age, sex and type 1 diabetes), the FRAX score without BMD was the only variable significantly associated with risk of MOF (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Clinical use of FRAX without BMD is useful tool in identifying adults with type 1 diabetes at higher risk for MOF risk and may help clinicians to guide therapeutic decision-making in this high fracture risk population.

Comparison of differences in bone microarchitecture in adult- versus juvenile-onset type 1 diabetes Asian males versus non-diabetes males: an observational cross-sectional pilot study

PURPOSE

Evidence about bone microarchitecture in Asian type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients is lacking. We assessed the bone microarchitecture in T1D patients versus controls and compare the differences between juvenile-onset and adult-onset T1D patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited 32 Asian males with T1D and 32 age-, sex-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) for ultradistal nondominant radius and tibia were performed. The data were analyzed using Student's t test and analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 15 had juvenile-onset T1D, with a median disease duration of 11 years, and 17 had adult-onset T1D, with a median disease duration of 7 years. At the radius, adult-onset and juvenile-onset T1D patients had lower total volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), trabecular vBMD, trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) (p < 0.05) than the control subjects. After adjusting for BMI, disease duration, and insulin dose, juvenile-onset patients tended to have lower trabecular vBMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, and intracortical porosity (Ct.Po) than adult-onset patients. At the tibia, adult-onset patients displayed lower total vBMD, lower Ct. vBMD, and higher Ct.Po (p < 0.05), while juvenile-onset patients had lower Tb.Th and standard deviation of trabecular number (1/Tb.N.SD) (p < 0.05) than control subjects. After adjustment for covariates, adult-onset patients tended to have higher cortical pore diameter (Ct.Po.Dm) than juvenile-onset patients.

CONCLUSIONS

T1D patients were associated with compromised bone microarchitecture, adult-onset and juvenile-onset T1D patients demonstrated some differences in cortical and trabecular microarchitecture.

Altered cortical bone strength and lean mass in young women with long-duration (19 years) type 1 diabetes

To investigate bone health and body composition in young women with long-duration type 1 diabetes (T1D) in relation to matched controls. Twenty-three Swedish women, age 19.2-27.9 years, with a T1D duration of 10 years or more were recruited from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry (NDR). An age-, gender- and geography-matched control group was recruited. Bone mass and body composition were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Data was retrieved from the NDR and SWEDIABKIDS registries. T1D individuals had a mean diabetes duration of 19 years. T1D individuals had reduced lean mass (40.0 ± 6.1 kg vs. 43.9 ± 4.9 kg) and were shorter (1.66 ± 0.06 m vs. 1.71 ± 0.06 m) although comparable BMI. Subjects with T1D had lower muscle area (P = 0.0045). No differences were observed for fractures; physical activity; total, lumbar spine or femur areal bone mineral density. The cortical bone strength strain index was lower for TD1 patients (1875 ± 399 mm³ vs. 2277 ± 332 mm³). In conclusion, young women with long-term diabetes duration showed reduced cortical bone strength, decreased periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and altered body composition. These factors contribute to the health burden of TD1, which warrants further attention for advancing bone health in women with T1D.

Hip Structural Analysis Reveals Impaired Hip Geometry in Girls With Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), the risk of hip fracture is up to 6-fold greater than that of the general population. However, the cause of this skeletal fragility remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in hip geometry and imaging-based estimates of bone strength between youth with and without T1D using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based hip structural analysis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparison.

PARTICIPANTS

Girls ages 10 to 16 years, including n = 62 with T1D and n = 61 controls.

RESULTS

The groups had similar age, bone age, pubertal stage, height, lean mass, and physical activity. Bone mineral density at the femoral neck and total hip did not differ in univariate comparisons but was lower at the femoral neck in T1D after adjusting for bone age, height, and lean mass. Subjects with T1D had significantly lower cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, section modulus, and cortical thickness at the narrow neck, with deficits of 5.7% to 10.3%. Cross-sectional area was also lower at the intertrochanteric region in girls with T1D. Among those T1D subjects with HbA1c greater than the cohort median of 8.5%, deficits in hip geometry and strength estimates were more pronounced.

CONCLUSIONS

DXA-based hip structural analysis revealed that girls with T1D have unfavorable geometry and lower estimates of bone strength at the hip, which may contribute to skeletal fragility and excess hip fracture risk in adulthood. Higher average glycemia may exacerbate effects of T1D on hip geometry.

Acute Hyperinsulinemia Alters Bone Turnover in Women and Men With Type 1 Diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) increases fracture risk across the lifespan. The low bone turnover associated with T1D is thought to be related to glycemic control, but it is unclear whether peripheral hyperinsulinemia due to dependence on exogenous insulin has an independent effect on suppressing bone turnover. The purpose of this study was to test the bone turnover marker (BTM) response to acute hyperinsulinemia. Fifty‐eight adults aged 18 to 65 years with T1D over 2 years were enrolled at seven T1D Exchange Clinic Network sites. Participants had T1D diagnosis between age 6 months to 45 years. Participants were stratified based on their residual endogenous insulin secretion measured as peak C‐peptide response to a mixed meal tolerance test. BTMs (CTX, P1NP, sclerostin [SCL], osteonectin [ON], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], osteocalcin [OCN], osteoprotegerin [OPG], osteopontin [OPN], and IGF‐1) were assessed before and at the end of a 2‐hour hyperinsulinemic‐euglycemic clamp (HEC). Baseline ON (r = −0.30, p = .022) and OCN (r = −0.41, p = .002) were negatively correlated with age at T1D diagnosis, but baseline BTMs were not associated with HbA1c. During the HEC, P1NP decreased significantly (−14.5 ± 44.3%; p = .020) from baseline. OCN, ON, and IGF‐1 all significantly increased (16.0 ± 13.1%, 29.7 ± 31.7%, 34.1 ± 71.2%, respectively; all p < .001) during the clamp. The increase in SCL was not significant (7.3 ± 32.9%, p = .098), but the decrease in CTX (−12.4 ± 48.9, p = .058) neared significance. ALP and OPG were not changed from baseline (p = .23 and p = .77, respectively). Baseline ON and SCL were higher in men, but OPG was higher in women (all p ≤ .029). SCL was the only BTM that changed differently in women than men. There were no differences in baseline BTMs or change in BTMs between C‐peptide groups. Exogenous hyperinsulinemia acutely alters bone turnover, suggesting a need to determine whether strategies to promote healthy remodeling may protect bone quality in T1D. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Trabecular bone score and transilial bone trabecular histomorphometry in type 1 diabetes and healthy controls

Patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) have an increased risk of fracture. Little is known about the microarchitecture of trabecular bone in T1DM, which may account for some of the increased risk. We report here a secondary analysis comparing Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) derived from DXA to 2-D histomorphometric and 3-D micro-computerized tomography (CT) variables obtained from iliac biopsies in 83 subjects (29 T1DM and 54 controls). The transilial bone biopsy specimens were fixed, embedded and scanned using a desktop micro-CT at 16 μm resolution. They were then sectioned and quantitative histomorphometry was performed. TBS of the anterior/posterior (AP) spine was obtained by re-analysis of AP lumbar spine DXA images. Overall, there were no differences in TBS, histomorphometry or micro-CT measurements between T1DM and controls. There was a significant association between TBS and 2-D BV/TV using multivariable linear regression after adjusting for group, age and gender. For every 1 unit increase in 2-D BV/TV, TBS increases by 0.0036 units after adjusting for group, gender and age. In conclusion, T1DM does not result in abnormal TBS, histomorphometric or micro-CT variables in young T1DM patients in the absence of diabetic complications. TBS is a good surrogate measure for trabecular microarchitecture.

Update on the Acute Effects of Glucose, Insulin, and Incretins on Bone Turnover In Vivo

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on the acute effects of glucose, insulin, and incretins on markers of bone turnover in those with and without diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Bone resorption is suppressed acutely in response to glucose and insulin challenges in both healthy subjects and patients with diabetes. The suppression is stronger with oral glucose compared with intravenous delivery. Stronger responses with oral glucose may be related to incretin effects on insulin secretion or from a direct effect on bone turnover. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) infusion acutely suppresses bone resorption without much effect on bone formation. The bone turnover response to a metabolic challenge may be attenuated in type 2 diabetes, but this is an understudied area. A knowledge gap exists regarding bone turnover responses to a metabolic challenge in type 1 diabetes. The gut-pancreas-bone link is potentially an endocrine axis. This linkage is disrupted in diabetes, but the mechanism and progression of this disruption are not understood.

The risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis update

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is associated with increased fracture risk but we do not know what affects this risk. We investigated the risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures in diabetes and whether this risk was affected by age, gender, body mass index, diabetes type and duration, insulin use and diabetic complications.

METHODS

We selected a previously published review to be updated. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 2020. We included observational studies with age and gender-adjusted risk of fractures in adults with diabetes compared to adults without diabetes. We extracted data from published reports that we summarised using random effects model.

FINDINGS

From the 3140 records identified, 49 were included, 42 in the hip fracture analysis, reporting data from 17,571,738 participants with 319,652 fractures and 17 in the non-vertebral fracture review, reporting data from 2,978,487 participants with 181,228 fractures. We found an increase in the risk of fracture in diabetes both for hip (RR 4.93, 3.06-7.95, in type 1 diabetes and RR1.33, 1.19-1.49, in type 2 diabetes) and for non-vertebral fractures (RR 1.92, 0.92-3.99, in type 1 and RR 1.19, 1,11-1.28 in type 2). At the hip, the risk was higher in the younger population in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In those with type 2 diabetes, longer diabetes duration and insulin use was associated with an increased risk. We did not investigate the effect of bone density, falls, anti-diabetic drugs and hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes is associated with an increase in both hip and non-vertebral fracture risk.

Lower estimated bone strength and impaired bone microarchitecture in children with type 1 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with type 1 diabetes has an increased risk of fracture. We wished to evaluate estimated bone strength in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and assess peripheral bone geometry, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and microarchitecture.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) was performed of the radius and tibia in 84 children with type 1 diabetes and 55 healthy sibling controls. Estimated bone strength was assessed using a microfinite element analysis solver. Multivariate regression analyses were performed adjusting for age, sex, height and body mass index.

RESULTS

The median age was 13.0 years in the diabetes group vs 11.5 years in healthy sibling controls. The median (range) diabetes duration was 4.2 (0.4-15.9) years; median (range) latest year Hb1Ac was 7.8 (5.9-11.8) % (61.8 (41-106) mmol/mol). In adjusted analyses, patients with type 1 diabetes had reduced estimated bone strength in both radius, β -390.6 (-621.2 to -159.9) N, p=0.001, and tibia, β -891.9 (-1321 to -462.9) N, p<0.001. In the radius and tibia, children with type 1 diabetes had reduced cortical area, trabecular vBMD, trabecular number and trabecular bone volume fraction and increased trabecular inhomogeneity, adjusted p<0.05 for all. Latest year HbA1c was negatively correlated with bone microarchitecture (radius and tibia), trabecular vBMD and estimated bone strength (tibia).

CONCLUSION

Children with type 1 diabetes had reduced estimated bone strength. This reduced bone strength could partly be explained by reduced trabecular bone mineral density, adverse microarchitecture and reduced cortical area. We also found increasing latest year HbA1c to be associated with several adverse changes in bone parameters. HR-pQCT holds potential to identify early adverse bone changes and to explain the increased fracture risk in young patients with type 1 diabetes.

Bone Mineral Density across the Lifespan in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Fracture risk in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is higher than their peers without diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare bone mineral density (BMD) across the lifespan in individuals with T1D and age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Subjects (5-71 years) with T1D and matched controls from ongoing research studies at Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Participants with lumbar spine BMD by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were divided into 2 groups: children ≤20 years and adults >20 years.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison of BMD by diabetes status across age groups and sex using a linear least squares model adjusted for age and body mass index (body mass index (BMI) for adults; and BMI z-score in children).

RESULTS

Lumbar spine BMD from 194 patients with T1D and 156 controls were analyzed. There was no difference in age- and BMI-adjusted lumbar spine BMD between patients with T1D and controls: among male children (least squares mean ± standard error of the mean [LSM ± SEM]; 0.80 ± 0.01 vs 0.80 ± 0.02 g/cm2, P = .98) or adults (1.01 ± 0.03 vs 1.01 ± 0.03 g/cm2, P = .95), and female children (0.78 ± 0.02 vs 0.81 ± 0.02 g/cm2, P = .23) or adults (0.98 ± 0.02 vs 1.01 ± 0.02 g/cm2, P = .19). Lumbar spine (0.98 ± 0.02 vs 1.04 ± 0.02 g/cm2, P = .05), femoral neck (0.71 ± 0.02 vs 0.79 ± 0.02 g/cm2, P = .003), and total hip (0.84 ± 0.02 vs 0.91 ± 0.02, P = .005) BMD was lower among postmenopausal women with T1D than postmenopausal women without diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Across age groups, lumbar spine BMD was similar in patients with T1D compared with age- and sex-matched participants without diabetes, except postmenopausal females with T1D had lower lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD.

Peripheral Neuropathy as a Component of Skeletal Disease in Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to explore clinical associations between peripheral neuropathy and diabetic bone disease and to discuss how nerve dysfunction may contribute to dysregulation of bone metabolism, reduced bone quality, and fracture risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diabetic neuropathy can decrease peripheral sensation (sensory neuropathy), impair motor coordination (motor neuropathy), and increase postural hypotension (autonomic neuropathy). Together, this can impair overall balance and increase the risk for falls and fractures. In addition, the peripheral nervous system has the potential to regulate bone metabolism directly through the action of local neurotransmitters on bone cells and indirectly through neuroregulation of the skeletal vascular supply. This review critically evaluates existing evidence for diabetic peripheral neuropathy as a risk factor or direct actor on bone disease. In addition, we address therapeutic and experimental considerations to guide patient care and future research evaluating the emerging relationship between diabetic neuropathy and bone health.

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Bone Health

Long-term exposure to a diabetic environment leads to changes in bone metabolism and impaired bone micro-architecture through a variety of mechanisms on molecular and structural levels. These changes predispose the bone to an increased fracture risk and impaired osseus healing. In a clinical practice, adequate control of diabetes mellitus is essential for preventing detrimental effects on bone health. Alternative fracture risk assessment tools may be needed to accurately determine fracture risk in patients living with diabetes mellitus. Currently, there is no conclusive model explaining the mechanism of action of diabetes mellitus on bone health, particularly in view of progenitor cells. In this review, the best available literature on the impact of diabetes mellitus on bone health in vitro and in vivo is summarised with an emphasis on future translational research opportunities in this field.