Differentiation ability of Gli1+ cells during orthodontic tooth movement

Localization of α-smooth muscle actin in osteoblast differentiation during periodontal development

α-Smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) is an actin isoform commonly found within vascular smooth muscle cells. Moreover, α-SMA-positive cells are localized in the dental follicle (DF). DF is derived from alveolar bone (AB), cementum, and periodontal ligament (PDL). Therefore, α-SMA-positive cells in the periodontal tissue are speculated to be a marker for mesenchymal stem cells during tooth development. In particular, the mechanism of osteoblast differentiation is not clear. This study demonstrated the fate of α-SMA-positive cells around the tooth germ immunohistochemically. First, α-SMA- and Runx2-positive localization at embryonic days (E) 13, E14, postnatal days (P) 9, and P15 was demonstrated. α-SMA- and Runx2-positive cells were detected in the upper part of the DF at P1. At P9 and P15, α-SMA-positive cells in the PDL were detected in the upper and lower parts. The positive reaction of Runx2 was also localized in the PDL. Then, the distribution of α-SMA-positive cell progeny at P9 and P15 were clarified using α-SMA-CreERT2/ROSA26-loxP-stop-loxP-tdTomato (α-SMA/tomato) mice. It has known that Runx2-positive cells differentiate into osteoblasts. In this study, some Runx2 and α-SMA-positive cells were localized in the DF and PDL. The lineage-tracing analysis demonstrated that the α-SMA/tomato-positive cells expressing Runx2 or Osterix were detected on the AB surface at P15. α-SMA/tomato-positive cells expressing type I collagen were found in the AB matrix. These results indicate that the progeny of the α-SMA-positive cells in the DF could differentiate into osteogenic cells. In conclusion, α-SMA could be a potential marker of progenitor cells that differentiate into osteoblasts.

Inflammation and mechanical force-induced bone remodeling

Periodontitis arises from imbalanced host-microbe interactions, leading to dysbiosis and destructive inflammation. The host's innate and adaptive immune responses produce pro-inflammatory mediators that stimulate destructive events, which cause loss of alveolar bone and connective tissue attachment. There is no consensus on the factors that lead to a conversion from gingivitis to periodontitis, but one possibility is the proximity of the inflammation to the bone, which promotes bone resorption and inhibits subsequent bone formation during coupled bone formation. Conversely, orthodontic tooth movement is triggered by the mechanical force applied to the tooth, resulting in bone resorption on the compression side and new bone formation on the tension side. However, the environment around orthodontic brackets readily retains dental plaque and may contribute to inflammation and bone remodeling. The immune, epithelial, stromal, endothelial and bone cells of the host play an important role in setting the stage for bone remodeling that occurs in both periodontitis and orthodontic tooth movement. Recent advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing have provided new insights into the roles and interactions of different cell types in response to challenges. In this review, we meticulously examine the functions of key cell types such as keratinocytes, leukocytes, stromal cells, osteocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts involved in inflammation- and mechanical force-driven bone remodeling. Moreover, we explore the combined effects of these two conditions: mechanical force-induced bone remodeling combined with periodontal disease (chronic inflammation) and periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (acute transient inflammation). This comprehensive review enhances our understanding of inflammation- and mechanical force-induced bone remodeling.

In vivo dynamics of hard tissue-forming cell origins: Insights from Cre/loxP-based cell lineage tracing studies

Bone tissue provides structural support for our bodies, with the inner bone marrow (BM) acting as a hematopoietic organ. Within the BM tissue, two types of stem cells play crucial roles: mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (or skeletal stem cells) and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). These stem cells are intricately connected, where BM-MSCs give rise to bone-forming osteoblasts and serve as essential components in the BM microenvironment for sustaining HSCs. Despite the mid-20th century proposal of BM-MSCs, their in vivo identification remained elusive owing to a lack of tools for analyzing stemness, specifically self-renewal and multipotency. To address this challenge, Cre/loxP-based cell lineage tracing analyses are being employed. This technology facilitated the in vivo labeling of specific cells, enabling the tracking of their lineage, determining their stemness, and providing a deeper understanding of the in vivo dynamics governing stem cell populations responsible for maintaining hard tissues. This review delves into cell lineage tracing studies conducted using commonly employed genetically modified mice expressing Cre under the influence of LepR, Gli1, and Axin2 genes. These studies focus on research fields spanning long bones and oral/maxillofacial hard tissues, offering insights into the in vivo dynamics of stem cell populations crucial for hard tissue homeostasis.

Developing long bones respond to surrounding tissues by trans-pairing of periosteal osteoclasts and endocortical osteoblasts

Developing long bones alter their shape while maintaining uniform cortical thickness via coordinated activity of bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts at periosteal and endosteal surfaces, a process we designate trans-pairing. Two types of trans-pairing shift cortical bone in opposite orientations: peri-forming trans-pairing (peri-t-p) increases bone marrow space and endo-forming trans-pairing (endo-t-p) decreases it, via paired activity of bone resorption and formation across the cortex. Here, we focused on endo-t-p in growing bones. Analysis of endo-t-p activity in the cortex of mouse fibulae revealed osteoclasts under the periosteum compressed by muscles, and expression of RANKL in periosteal cells of the cambium layer. Furthermore, mature osteoblasts were localized on the endosteum, while preosteoblasts were at the periosteum and within cortical canals. X-ray tomographic microscopy revealed the presence of cortical canals more closely associated with endo- than with peri-t-p. Sciatic nerve transection followed by muscle atrophy and unloading induced circumferential endo-t-p with concomitant spread of cortical canals. Such canals likely supply the endosteum with preosteoblasts from the periosteum under endo-t-p, allowing bone shape to change in response to mechanical stress or nerve injury.

Periodontal Ligament Cell Apoptosis Activates Lepr+ Osteoprogenitors in Orthodontics

Alveolar bone (AB) remodeling, including formation and absorption, is the foundation of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). However, the sources and mechanisms underlying new bone formation remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to understand the potential mechanism of bone formation during OTM, focusing on the leptin receptor+ (Lepr+) osteogenitors and periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs). We demonstrated that Lepr+ cells activated by force-induced PDLC apoptosis served as distinct osteoprogenitors during orthodontic bone regeneration. We investigated bone formation both in vivo and in vitro. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis and lineage tracing demonstrated that Lepr represents a subcluster of stem cells that are activated and differentiate into osteoblasts during OTM. Targeted ablation of Lepr+ cells in a mouse model disrupted orthodontic force-guided bone regeneration. Furthermore, apoptosis and sequential fluorescent labeling assays revealed that the apoptosis of PDLCs preceded new bone deposition. We found that PDL stem cell-derived apoptotic vesicles activated Lepr+ cells in vitro. Following apoptosis inhibition, orthodontic force-activated osteoprogenitors and osteogenesis were significantly downregulated. Notably, we found that bone formation occurred on the compression side during OTM; this has been first reported here. To conclude, we found a potential mechanism of bone formation during OTM that may provide new insights into AB regeneration.

Osteoblast differentiation of Gli1⁺ cells via Wnt and BMP signaling pathways during orthodontic tooth movement

OBJECTIVES

Factors that induce bone formation during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) remain unclear. Gli1 was recently identified as a stem cell marker in the periodontal ligament (PDL). Therefore, we evaluated the mechanism of differentiation of Cre/LoxP-mediated Gli1/Tomato+ cells into osteoblasts during OTM.

METHODS

After the final administration of tamoxifen to 8-week-old Gli1-CreERT2/ROSA26-loxP-stop-loxP-tdTomato mice for 2 days, nickel-titanium closed coil springs were attached between the upper anterior alveolar bone and the first molar. Immunohistochemical localizations of β-catenin, Smad4, and Runx2 were observed in the PDL on 2, 5, and 10 days after OTM initiation.

RESULTS

In the untreated tooth, few Gli1/Tomato+ cells were detected in the PDL. Two days after OTM initiation, the number of Gli1/Tomato+ cells increased in the PDL on the tension side. On this side, 49.3 ± 7.0% of β-catenin+ and 48.7 ± 5.7% of Smad4+ cells were found in the PDL, and Runx2 expression was detected in some Gli1/Tomato+ cells apart from the alveolar bone. The number of positive cells in the PDL reached a maximum on day 5. In contrast, on the compression side, β-catenin and Smad4 exhibited less immunoreactivity. On day 10, Gli1/Tomato+ cells were aligned on the alveolar bone on the tension side, with some expressing Runx2.

CONCLUSIONS

Gli1+ cells in the PDL differentiated into osteoblasts during OTM. Wnt and bone morphogenetic proteins signaling pathways may be involved in this differentiation.

The Role of Gli1+ Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Osteogenesis of Craniofacial Bone

Glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (Gli1) is a transcriptional activator of hedgehog (Hh) signaling that regulates target gene expression and several cellular biological processes. Cell lineage tracing techniques have highlighted Gli1 as an ideal marker for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vivo. Gli1+ MSCs are critical for the osteogenesis of the craniofacial bone; however, the regulatory mechanism by which Gli1+ MSCs mediate the bone development and tissue regeneration of craniofacial bone has not been systematically outlined. This review comprehensively elucidates the specific roles of Gli1+ MSCs in craniofacial bone osteogenesis. In addition to governing craniofacial bone development, Gli1+ MSCs are associated with the tissue repair of craniofacial bone under pathological conditions. Gli1+ MSCs promote intramembranous and endochondral ossification of the craniofacial bones, and assist the osteogenesis of the craniofacial bone by improving angiopoiesis. This review summarizes the novel role of Gli1+ MSCs in bone development and tissue repair in craniofacial bones, which offers new insights into bone regeneration therapy.

Bone formation ability of Gli1+ cells in the periodontal ligament after tooth extraction

During the process of socket healing after tooth extraction, osteoblasts appear in the tooth socket and form alveolar bone; however, the source of these osteoblasts is still uncertain. Recently, it has been demonstrated that cells expressing Gli1, a downstream factor of sonic hedgehog signaling, exhibit stem cell properties in the periodontal ligament (PDL). Therefore, in the present study, the differentiation ability of Gli1⁺-PDL cells after tooth extraction was analyzed using Gli1-Cre^ERT2/ROSA26-loxP-stop-loxP-tdTomato (iGli1/Tomato) mice. After the final administration of tamoxifen to iGli1/Tomato mice, Gli1/Tomato⁺ cells were rarely detected in the PDL. One day after the tooth extraction, although inflammatory cells appeared in the tooth socket, Periostin⁺ PDL-like tissues having a few Gli1/Tomato⁺ cells remained near the alveolar bone. Three days after the extraction, the number of Gli1/Tomato⁺ cells increased as evidenced by numerous PCNA⁺ cells in the socket. Some of these Gli1/Tomato⁺ cells expressed BMP4 and Phosphorylated (P)-Smad1/5/8. After seven days, the Osteopontin⁺ bone matrix was formed in the tooth socket apart from the alveolar bone. Many Gli1/Tomato⁺ osteoblasts that were positive for Runx2⁺ were arranged on the surface of the newly formed bone matrix. In the absence of Gli1⁺-PDL cells in Gli1-Cre^ERT2/Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP-tdDTA (iGli1/DTA) mice, the amount of newly formed bone matrix was significantly reduced in the tooth socket. Therefore, these results collectively suggest that Gli1⁺-PDL cells differentiate into osteoblasts to form the bone matrix in the tooth socket; thus, this differentiation might be regulated, at least in part, by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling.